Home Blog Page 3361

‘We expect a four-fold increase in sales of our hybrids’

Mr. Cruz — PHOTO FROM TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES

TMP First Vice-President for Vehicle Sales Operations Danny Cruz anticipates healthy demand, and supply

Interview by Kap Maceda Aguila

Mr. Cruz — PHOTO FROM TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES

VELOCITY: What’s TMP’s projection for Yaris Cross sales?

DANNY CRUZ: We are expecting to sell it in volume — 900 units a month. Within the grade lineup, we’re expecting the 1.5 S HEV to account for 400 units. With the increasing demand for hybrids, we’re confident that when our customers go to the dealerships, they can get the units that they want. The supply is there.

Can Indonesia (where the Yaris Cross is made) supply these numbers?

Yes, we’ve confirmed that.

This also means that the Yaris Cross, if your numbers are right, will be the top-selling hybrid for Toyota, right?

It will definitely be, since it also becomes our most affordable hybrid yet. It should be able to capture volume.

What makes you confident about the demand for this hybrid?

We are already seeing an increase in the customer demand for hybrids. It’s trending upward, and I believe it’s also fueled by the support of the government as well through, for instance, the EVIDA Law. Actually, the whole industry is already engaged in educating customers about electrified vehicles — and what hybrids are all about and their benefits. For Toyota, we expect to increase sales of our hybrid vehicles by four times this year versus 2022.

What other segments are you seeing as growth areas, aside from TMP’s electrified vehicles?

Looking at our own introductions, we’ve released the Wigo for the entry-level segment, the Zenix MPV, and the Yaris Cross compact SUV. The increase can come from multiple segments — of course, driven by the country’s economy. We’re anticipating 15% to 20% industry-wide growth this year. We (TMP) don’t have a number that we can announce, but the vehicle supply is coming, and the market is there. We’re confident.

Quorum International eyeing to open four branches within next year

SPORTING GOODS retailer Quorum International, Inc. is planning to open four new branches of its brands as part of the expansion of its store network across the country.

Quorum International Chairman Roberto S. Claudio, Sr. said the company is eyeing to open one store in Mindanao, two stores in Northern Luzon, and one in Visayas under its expansion plans. However, he did not name the specific locations of the planned stores.

“We have four stores coming up within the next year. The planned stores are a mix of Toby’s Sports and Urban Athletics,” Mr. Claudio told reporters at the sidelines of the 29th National Retail Conference & Expo in Pasay City last week.

Quorum International currently has 75 stores, with 51 located in Metro Manila, he said.

“We’re saturated in Metro Manila since we already have 51 stores. We opened two new stores over the last two months, like the one in Tuguegarao. Our focus is more on the provinces,” Mr. Claudio said.

The company is seeing higher sales amid the health-conscious mindset adopted by consumers following the coronavirus pandemic, he said.

“People are more conscious about their health, especially after the pandemic. Plus, the concept of people working from home (WFH) boosted the demand for fitness equipment. People would buy treadmills and exercise bikes…” Mr. Claudio said.

He added that equipment and apparel sales have also increased as more people have “dressed down.”

“Our growth drivers are both equipment and apparel. Because of the pandemic and WFH, people are dressing down. They’re no longer dressing up. People going to work are now wearing jogging pants, shirts, and shorts,” Mr. Claudio said.

“It’s a phenomenon. People are dressing down because of the pandemic…With that dressed down, the demand for athleisure wear has really increased,” he added.

The company’s sales are still dominated by in-store purchases, while online sales accounted for 25% of the total, up from 2% pre-pandemic, he said. — Revin Mikhael D. Ochave

World Breastfeeding Day: Why breast is best

LUCAS MENDES-UNSPLASH

Aug. 7 is World Breastfeeding Day. It celebrates the 1990 Innocenti Declaration, a gathering representing 30 countries that decided on a global action plan to promote and protect breastfeeding.

Breastfeeding is a bond, a symbol of love, a source of health.

“There is no substitute for mother’s milk.” This statement has been a repeated phrase, an advocacy if you may, shared by both my parents, Alessandro and Efrelyn Iellamo. My father has been working as a breastfeeding consultant for quite some time and my mother has been practicing maternal and childcare in the academe. Needless to say, breastfeeding was a main subject matter during dinners.

My parents were very vocal about the importance of breastfeeding for nutrition and immunity of the baby. With books and journals lying around our home, I took my time to read and understand breastfeeding’s advantages. At the age of five, I remember supporting my mother and younger sister when they joined a mom and baby breastfeeding award contest. They won.

On the other hand, I was a very sickly kid and would have the flu three to four times a year and daily allergy attacks. My mother would often compare my immune system to my sister’s as she would only get sick once a year and it would only last for a day. In her words, “Breastfed baby si Graziella (my younger sister) kaya ganyan.” Though my mother did breastfeed me for three months, she switched to formula milk. This was due to lack of education and awareness at that time. My mom eventually realized that there is no substitute for mother’s milk. Hence my younger sister was breastfed until she was two years old.

To further my understanding, I read studies on infant formula milk. Milk formula companies promise that a child who takes formula is a smart and gifted child, a child protected from sickness. But data and evidence show the contrary. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), formula milk companies make false claims.

These false claims include the following: Formula products with added ingredients improve brain development and immunity. Formula products are needed after 12 months of age. Breast milk is inadequate for the nutrition of older infants and children. Formula milk keeps babies fuller for a longer time and therefore helps them sleep. And the quality of breast milk declines with time.

According to the National Library of Medicine, infants not being breastfed is associated with an increased incidence of infectious morbidity, including otitis media, gastroenteritis, and pneumonia as well as elevated risks of childhood obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, leukemia, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Among premature infants, not receiving breast milk is associated with an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). For mothers, failure to breastfeed is associated with an increased incidence of premenopausal breast cancer, ovarian cancer, retained gestational weight gain, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.

My father, Alessandro Iellamo, wrote in “Breastfeeding knowledge of mothers in protracted crisis” (2021): “Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months and continuing breastfeeding for two years or beyond may prevent under-five deaths, primarily from infections resulting in diarrhea, pneumonia, and neonatal sepsis. Beyond the first years of life, breastfeeding has been found to improve children’s quality of life by preventing various diseases such as leukemia, asthma, ear infections, allergies, and diabetes.”

Moreover, the economic burden associated with sub-optimal breastfeeding is huge. In the global setting, the economic burden was estimated at $240.6 million in 2015. This burden includes healthcare costs and the forgone workforce resulting from child mortality.

From a broad development perspective, the WHO says that breastfeeding is critical for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Breastfeeding improves nutrition (SDG2), prevents child mortality, decreases the risk of non-communicable diseases (SDG3), and supports cognitive development and education (SDG4). Breastfeeding also enables ending poverty, promoting economic growth, and reducing inequalities.

For all the reasons above, government health agencies of all countries, medical societies, and international organizations such as the WHO and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) have given importance to breastfeeding advocacy. They and other stakeholders have pursued awareness programs and strategies to protect and promote a healthier community through breastfeeding.

The urgency for governments to emphasize breastfeeding was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) Philippines called on medical agencies to continue the efforts for breastfeeding education because exclusive breastfeeding is a vital measure for Infection Prevention and Control (IPC). With proper IPC, protection from infection becomes stronger, especially in challenging circumstances and in emergencies. Breastfeeding is associated with immunizing babies from COVID-19.

Breastfeeding is a public health responsibility and a health promotion strategy, says my mother, Efrelyn Iellamo, an Assistant Professor at the University of the Philippines. Governments must establish an enabling environment so that women are able to start breastfeeding right after birth and continue while at home and while working.

But the enabling environment for breastfeeding faces challenges, including the self-serving interference of the formula milk industry. A possible emerging policy, which still can be stopped, is the bill titled Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Act, recently passed on third reading in the House of Representatives.

According to the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA), this CSR bill provides a legal and public relations cover for companies in highly regulated industries such as tobacco manufacturing and commercial infant formula to conduct public health interference, If passed, this will bypass the Philippine Milk Code of 1986, which regulates the marketing of breast milk substitutes for children 0 to 36 months (0-3 years of age) and restricts the inappropriate marketing of breast milk substitutes.

Humanitarian response groups are concerned over the bill’s provision that may have the effect of displacing breastfeeding and thus worsening public health. A section of the CSR bill states: “All business organizations are allowed to donate products and services under their CSR-related activities for disaster relief and assistance, in accordance with the regulations to be issued by the appropriate government agency. All existing laws and regulations restricting or prohibiting the right of local government units under a state of calamity and/or during a national emergency to solicit or accept any donation of products and services under the CSR-related activities for disaster relief and assistance of a business organization are hereby amended.”

The controversial CSR bill also benefits the tobacco industry. Currently, there is a Civil Service Commission (CSC)-Department of Health (DoH) Joint Memorandum Circular that protects the bureaucracy from tobacco industry interference. The Circular limits interactions with the tobacco industry to those that strictly cater to necessary regulations and control. However, the CSR bill includes a repealing clause that will overturn all laws inconsistent with it.

The Philippine government’s duty is to promote and support breastfeeding programs, make available quality breastfeeding support services for all women and their children, and ensure effective compliance with the Philippine Milk Code. The CSR bill should reject any provision that allows industries like tobacco and formula milk to promote and, worse, donate products and services that are inimical to health or to public interest.

 

Emmanuella Iellamo is a health policy researcher of Action for Economic Reforms.

Clothiers bet on ‘cooling’ fabrics as global temps rise

COLUMBIA’S Men’s PFG Zero Rules Ice Hoodie which is described as a ‘sun-safe hoodie built with maximum cooling technology, UPF 50 sun protection, and advanced sweat-wicking.’

NEW YORK — Retailers such as Macy’s and Columbia Sportswear are expanding their use of “breathable” and “cooling” fabrics in a bid to boost sales as record-high temperatures drive demand for clothing that can help consumers beat the heat.

Other major companies, including VF Corp. and Permira-owned Reformation, are also touting warm-weather styles made with Tencel, a lyocell fiber that textile manufacturer Lenzing says is more absorbent than cotton.

The push comes as clothing retailers, whose sales dipped as inflation-weary consumers prioritized essentials over discretionary purchases, amp up their marketing of “cooling” garments as heat waves batter at least three continents.

Apparel manufacturers and sellers are banking on lightweight materials and performance fabrics aimed at offering more relief than traditional cotton and polyester knits, as well as high-tech fibers they say offer wearers “active” cooling.

Many such textiles have been used for years, especially in athletic clothing from brands such as Lululemon, according to Jess Ramirez, an analyst for Jane Hali & Associates. But with rising temperatures, more retailers are promoting them for hot weather and expanding into year-round styles as winters grow warmer.

Macy’s officials told Reuters its newest line includes a $150 trench coat made with lyocell and $24.50 T-shirts made with modal — two silky fibers produced from wood pulp that textile experts say are lightweight and breathable.

The department store chain is expanding such inventory and will market some of those items as “breathable” and “cooling,” Macy’s Senior Vice-President of Private Brand Strategy Emily Erusha-Hilleque said. Macy’s conducts quality tests to back the claims, she added, but the company declined to offer details.

Women’s brand Reformation in June began selling new skirts, bottoms and dresses with Tencel, which the company calls “foundational” to its products.

Few retail market firms track specific sales of “cooling” clothes, but related fabric manufacturing is rising.

Tencel-maker Lenzing expanded production with a Thailand facility last year, its senior business development manager Sharon Perez said, citing growing demand from brands including Patagonia and VF’s North Face despite costs of up to $0.10 more per pound than other materials.

Overall, global production of cellulose-based fibers including lyocell, modal, and cupro grew more than 10% to 7.2 million tons in 2022, according to the nonprofit Textile Exchange.

PT Golden Tekstil, an Indonesian mill whose clients include Macy’s, PVH, and Ralph Lauren’s Polo brand, boosted its “performance” fabric production by 20% to 30% in recent years, its US design director Beth Carter Schlack told Reuters.

Still, it also remains unclear whether materials marketed as cooling can lower body temperature or simply help wearers feel more comfortable.

Textile industry groups have developed tests to assess cooling, mostly by measuring a fabric’s ability to distribute moisture and dry out quickly as a proxy, according to the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists.

But no specific tests are required before companies can make cooling claims, and not all lab findings necessarily translate to actual use, said Roger Barker, who studies textiles at North Carolina State University.

ACTIVE COOLING
Companies are also producing more garments with performance fabrics such as Lycra’s COOLMAX, a polyester yarn designed to wick sweat away to evaporate.

Fast Retailing’s Uniqlo has expanded its AIRism line using super-fine, smooth fibers made from polyester and cupro, which is made from cotton waste, that it says dry quickly and feel cool.

Kirsty Wilson, a materials consultant who has worked with major retailers, told Reuters more brands are using “performance yarns” such as COOLMAX that dry more quickly than cotton.

J. Crew and H&M are among the retailers using COOLMAX, which is also used in bedding, sleeping bags, and other products geared toward warm, humid weather.

Hotter temperatures are also driving more advanced “active cooling” fiber technology by embedding materials that trap and release heat rather than the passive cooling offered by most materials to-date.

While sweat-wicking clothes can speed up the evaporation of sweat from the body, which is how humans naturally stay cool, there is a limit to how much relief such passive cooling provides, said Barker, who heads North Carolina’s Textile Protection and Comfort Center.

This summer, Columbia Sportswear released a new sweatshirt with its updated Omni-Freeze Zero Ice fabric, combining “active” technology with wicking properties and a print it says absorbs sweat.

Creating new styles for hot environments will “remain an area of focus,” Haskhell Beckham, the company’s vice-president for innovation, told Reuters.

Other retailers have turned to similar fabrics, including those from Atlanta-based textile manufacturer brrr that embed cooling minerals.

Brrr works with 47 brands — including Adidas, which launched golf polo shirts using its material in March — and has at least doubled production since 2018, according to its Vice-President of Sales Julie Brown.

While many garments with brrr fabrics target hot summers, there’s growing demand for modified base layers and cold-weather clothing as more shoppers experience unseasonably warm winters, Ms. Brown added.

“If you’re out walking or hiking or skiing, a lot of people want that cooling effect, even in wintertime,” she said. — Reuters

Gov’t debt yields climb on PHL, US data

YIELDS on government securities (GS) traded in the secondary market rose last week, driven by US inflation data, Moody’s Investors Service’s downgrade of the credit ratings of some US banks, as well as the Philippine economy’s weaker-than-expected performance in the second quarter.

Bond yields, which move opposite to prices, went up by 4.76 basis points (bps) on average week on week, based on PHP Bloomberg Valuation Service Reference Rates as of Aug. 11 published on the Philippine Dealing System’s website.

Rates increased across all tenors last week. The 91-, 182- and 364-day Treasury bills (T-bills) climbed by 15.6 bps, 13.17 bps, and 7.82 bps to fetch 5.8575%, 6.0551%, and 6.2757%, respectively.

The belly of the curve also went up as yields on the two-, three-, four-, five-, and seven-year Treasury bonds (T-bonds) rose by 4.72 bps (6.2985%), 2.9 bps (6.3221%), 2.03 bps (6.3424%), 2.23 bps (6.3717%), and 2.28 bps (6.4595%), respectively.

Likewise, at the long end, the rates of the 10-, 20-, and 25-year debt papers inched up by 0.15 bp (6.5648%), 0.16 bp (6.6993%) and 1.34 bps (6.7045%), respectively.

Total GS volume traded amounted to P4.65 billion on Friday, lower than the P10.77 billion seen on Aug. 4.

“Local yields moved higher due to the lingering impact of the US sovereign credit downgrade and the possibility of a BSP (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas) rate hike from the recent depreciation of the peso,” a bond trader said in an e-mail.

The bond trader also attributed last week’s yield movements to data showing slower-than-expected Philippine gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the second quarter that dampened investor sentiment.

“On the international front, moderate US inflation reports have likewise dragged bond yields,” the bond trader added.

The market was mostly muted last week, even as investors reacted to key economic data releases, said Alessandra P. Araullo, chief investment officer at ATRAM Trust Corp.

“Overall, volume traded has been lackluster as the recent volatility of the peso, upcoming bond supply, and the overall uncertainty of monetary policy direction continue to be the key drivers to cause markets to remain on the sideline,” Ms. Araullo said.

The Philippine economy grew at its slowest pace in the second quarter, dampened by elevated inflation, lingering impact of rising borrowing costs, and a decline in government spending.

In the April-to-June period, GDP expanded to 4.3% year on year, decelerating from the 6.4% expansion in the first quarter, and the 7.5% print a year earlier, the Philippine Statistics Authority reported last week.

The latest figure was lower than the median estimate of 6% by 21 economists conducted in a BusinessWorld poll.

For the first semester, GDP growth averaged 5.3%, below the government’s 6-7% target.

Meanwhile, US consumer prices increased moderately in July amid lower costs for goods, including used motor vehicles, a trend that could persuade the US Federal Reserve to leave interest rates unchanged next month, Reuters reported.

The consumer price index (CPI) rose 0.2% last month, matching the gain in June, the Labor department said on Thursday. Though the increase in the annual CPI rate picked up for the first time in 13 months, that was because it was calculated from a lower base after prices subsided last July following a jump that had boosted inflation to a pace not seen in more than 40 years.

The CPI advanced 3.2% in the 12 months through July. That followed a 3.0% rise in June, which was the smallest year-on-year gain since March 2021.

Annual consumer prices have come down from a peak of 9.1% in June 2022. The Fed has a 2% inflation target.

On the other hand, Moody’s cut credit ratings of several small to mid-sized US banks on Monday and said it may downgrade some of the nation’s biggest lenders, warning that the sector’s credit strength will likely be tested by funding risks and weaker profitability.

For this week, Ms. Araullo said investors will look to gradually lock in rates at these higher levels while awaiting clarity on market direction in the near term.

“We expect (local) monetary policy to hinge on local inflation expectation path and overall direction of global and local growth,” she said.

For the bond trader, local yields are expected to move with an upward bias this week.

“[This], amid the fringe possibilities of a BSP rate hike due to the recent weakening of the peso and potential hawkish signals from the Federal Reserve policy minutes,” the bond trader said.

BSP Governor Eli M. Remolona, Jr. earlier warned against “sudden reversals” of monetary policy as inflation risks persist.

The Monetary Board’s next policy meeting will be held on Aug. 17. — Abigail Marie P. Yraola with Reuters

LANDBANK approves loans worth over P8B for hog repopulation as of end-June

REUTERS

LAND BANK of the Philippines (LANDBANK) said it approved loans for hog repopulation worth P8.05 billion in the six months to June.

In a statement on Sunday, the bank said 36 borrowers took out loans from its Special Window and Interim Support to Nurture Hog Enterprises (SWINE) Lending Program.

The projects to be financed include the purchase of hogs and feed, construction and expansion of piggeries. Some of the loans were also for working capital.

The bank said commercial hog farmers registered as cooperatives or farmer’s associations, small and medium enterprises, and large enterprises or corporations may borrow up to 80% of the project cost.

Working capital loans are payable in a year, while permanent working capital financing may be repaid over five years, the bank said.

“Loans for fixed assets and construction of facilities are payable based on project cash flow (over) its economic useful life,” it added.

The SWINE Lending Program is a partnership with the Department of Agriculture.

LANDBANK said AJ Piggery Farm, which is among the beneficiaries of the program, was able to borrow P24 million for its startup commercial farm.

The loan covers construction of three piggery buildings, support facilities, a manure lagoon, wastewater treatment facilities, and the acquisition of young female hogs for breeding. — Sheldeen Joy Talavera

‘The five-seater subcompact SUV segment is an emerging one’

Mr. Bravante — PHOTO FROM TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES

TMP Vice-President for Product Planning Nico Bravante says the Yaris Cross is a perfect option for category browsers

Interview by Kap Maceda Aguila

Mr. Bravante — PHOTO FROM TOYOTA MOTOR PHILIPPINES

VELOCITY: How is the Yaris Cross a fit for the Philippine market?

NICO BRAVANTE: The subcompact SUV segment is one of the fastest-growing segments in the country, and those looking in this segment are also looking for a balance between affordability and high specifications. This makes the Yaris Cross a perfect fit. The five-seater subcompact SUV segment is an emerging one where Toyota did not previously have a model in.

What are its unique value propositions in its price point versus competitors?

We believe that the Yaris Cross is the most affordable hybrid with advanced and safety specs in the subcompact segment. Its strong hybrid system can run the vehicle using either gasoline or battery (or both) depending on driving conditions. At the very least, its specifications are on par with its main competitors, and it comes with a suite of both active and passive safety features including the full Toyota Safety Sense package. The hybrid variant can muster up to 27.8kpl (combined city and highway driving), while the gas models are still quite fuel-efficient at up to 18.2kpl.

The Yaris Cross is also going to be the hero model in TMP’s multi pathway to carbon neutrality. Please explain how this fits the bill, and how it expresses the company’s vision.

The multi pathway of Toyota means providing several electrified types depending on customer requirements and needs. The hybrid electric vehicle is one of them. We believe that the hybrid is the most practical solution, and we want to make the Toyota Hybrid System more accessible to everyone. How would you describe the appetite or readiness of the market now with respect to hybrids?

The Philippine market is a lot more accepting of hybrids as shown by our sales. This technology is reinforced by an eight-year warranty to ease customer concerns. This increase in acceptance can also be attributed to non-fiscal incentives like number-coding exemption.

How does the Yaris Cross compare to the Corolla Cross?

The Yaris Cross belongs to the B-SUV segment, while the Corolla Cross is in the C-SUV segment. They attempt to capture their respective customers by offering unique product packages, specific to that market’s needs. This introduction is for us to be able to capture B-SUV customers, while also providing the practicality of a value-for-money offering, especially for everyday driving. Customers who prefer a larger vehicle body, comfort, and better engine performance would be more likely to choose Corolla Cross over the Yaris Cross.

Analysts’ expectations on policy rates (August 2023)

THE PHILIPPINE central bank will likely keep its benchmark policy rates steady at 6.25% for a third straight meeting on Thursday, amid easing inflation and slowing economic growth. Read the full story.

Torre Lorenzo still looking to conduct IPO

TORRE Lorenzo Development Corp. (TLDC) is still looking to conduct an initial public offering (IPO) as it continues to grow its property portfolio, an official said on Friday.

“I think right now what we want to do is really build our organization and make it IPO-ready,” TLDC Chief Operations Officer Cathy Casares-Ko told reporters on the sidelines of a launch event.

“When you go for an IPO, you have to have a really good story. So, [this] contributes to the story, we are building it… but it is still on the table. We want the growth to be steadier before we go to the market,” Ms. Casares-Ko added.

In 2018, the company said that it was looking at capital-raising activities as it wants to grow as fast as other property firms in the market and is eyeing a listing between 2020 and 2023.

In 2020, the company also said it is eyeing a real estate investment trust for its property portfolio.

On Friday, the company announced that it is set to develop the west tower of its Torre Lorenzo Loyola property, a short distance from the 36-storey Torre Lorenzo Loyola east tower in Loyola Heights, Quezon City.

The new project is set to have up to 500 units within the new residential tower. It will also house upscale amenities for residents.

Meanwhile, the company said it has sold and turned over about 90% of the property’s P1.9-billion east tower development.

The project has a total of 654 units, with studio types spanning 21 to 28 square meters (sq.m.) and one-bedroom units spanning 38.3 sq.m. to 47.5 sq.m.

The company also announced its plan to expand its integrated development in Tierra Davao by adding a residential property, the Crown Residences, and an office and commercial center.

The developer is carrying out expansion activities within its Dusit Thani Lubi Plantation Resort in Davao de Oro.

During the first half, the company more than doubled its reservation sales from the same period last year. This represents 71% of its target for the year. — A.H. Halili

Interest rates on loans hit 790% in Latin America’s big fintech shakeout

THE NUMBERS sound almost implausible. As Brazilian consumers fall behind on debts and rattle a slew of financial-technology (fintech) startups in Latin America’s largest economy, one venture keeps notching ever higher.

Nu Holdings Ltd. now has reeled in enough customers — more than 85 million and counting — to rank among Latin America’s largest financial firms. The online bank and credit-card issuer, with early backers including Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., has watched its stock soar more than 90% this year, for a market value 200 times greater than its most recent 12-month reported profits. And to protect earnings, the firm has boosted rates on its cards — in some cases touching 790%.

Welcome to Latin America’s fintech shakeout, where economic turmoil is threatening to upend thousands of startups across the continent and leaving relatively few to dominate. It’s a swift turn in a decade-long rush by venture capitalists into the region, speeding up the process of deciding winners and losers.

Nubank is among a handful of platforms, such as Mercado Pago, the fintech arm of e-commerce giant MercadoLibre, Inc., that have managed to reach critical mass and stay ahead of the economic quakes. Others are merging to strengthen their position in the market. Many more are cutting workers, shelving ambitions or in some cases selling assets, going dormant or shutting down.

In one of the starkest signs yet of the shakeout, a report to be published by data provider Distrito later this month shows the number of fintechs being launched has plummeted in Latin America to just a half-dozen this year — down from a peak of 290 in 2018.

“When there is less capital available there are fewer fintechs born,” said Distrito Chief Executive Officer Gustavo Araujo. “Before, with interest rates close to zero, investors wanted growth at any cost. Now, with higher rates, investors are seeking healthy companies capable of expanding in a sustainable way.”

Even then, there are mounting questions among analysts over whether the biggest fintechs can maintain their eye-popping profitability and continue to expand.

Startups that got going by catering to poor people are likely to run into stiffer competition as they try to woo middle-class customers away from traditional banks. In other major markets, such as Mexico and Colombia, there are now ample competitors and tighter credit spreads.

And in Brazil almost 72 million people were late on debt payments at the end of June. Lenders have compensated for that by boosting interest they levy on loans. By the middle of that month, average rates on revolving credit-card lines reached almost 350% at Nubank and 560% at Mercado Pago, according to the central bank. Rates for individual borrowers can vary widely, and in some cases are hundreds of percentage points higher.

That’s fueling a political debate.

Card rates are “stratospheric,” Finance Minister Fernando Haddad complained earlier this year, floating the possibility of imposing a cap. Nubank and traditional banking rivals were initially able to quell that discussion, saying it’s the only way lenders can keep credit available in the current environment. But last week Mr. Haddad brought up the issue again, calling the charges “shameful” and promising to take measures.

The conundrum, central bank chief Roberto Campos Neto added Thursday, is that if rates are capped, lenders will close card accounts, potentially slowing spending. “It’s something you know how it starts but not how it ends,” he said.

The reality, according to Nubank Chief Executive Officer (CEO) David Velez, is that fintechs are forcing banks to lower their fees. He estimates his firm has saved customers 39 billion reais ($8 billion) in what they would have paid otherwise.

When his firm was founded in 2013, “financial services were a market outside the ‘realm’ of entrepreneurs, a market hitherto dominated by the largest companies in Latin America,” Mr. Velez said in a statement. “We broke the glass ceiling and allowed other entrepreneurs to enter this market, in different verticals. In a way, we were leaders of this revolution in the industry, and we are very proud of it.”

SOFTBANK’S BILLIONS
Venture capitalists flocked to Latin America after watching the meteoric rise of fintechs in Asia, where WeChat and Alipay became global behemoths by signing up China’s unbanked masses. Hoping for a similar feat in Latin America, backers pumped capital to legions of startups, especially in Brazil, aiming to capitalize on improvements in digital infrastructure in areas long ignored by banks.

SoftBank Group Corp., making the biggest bet, set up a $5-billion fund dedicated to the region in 2019 and 30 months later announced a second with $3 billion. Capital and financing came from Brazilian billionaires Jorge Paulo Lemann, Marcel Telles and Carlos Sicupira, as well as stalwarts of Silicon Valley and US finance, such as Sequoia Capital, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Visa, Inc.

Nubank was among the first to get its footing. The firm targeted young, poor, unbanked clients. Its big lure was a digital credit card without fees.

Its well-connected co-founders — CEO Velez had been a partner at Sequoia, Cristina Junqueira a card executive at Itau Unibanco Holding SA and Edward Wible a software engineer at Boston Consulting Group —quickly found backers. By early 2016, Goldman began pumping in hundreds of millions of dollars in finance to help Nubank ramp up lending.

When the pandemic arrived in 2020, online commerce got a boost and digital banking and payments took off. The next year, venture capital investments in Latin American fintechs reached a record of $6.16 billion, according to the LAVCA association for private equity investments in the region. That December, Nubank raised $2.8 billion in an initial public offering valuing the firm at $45 billion — more than any bank in Latin America at the time.

Many other fintechs were planning to announce their own public offerings, but everything changed when interest rates climbed in the US, Europe and Latin America. As bonds offered juicier returns, the appetite for risk that drove many venture-capital bets began to wane.

The fading investment frenzy left behind some 2,595 startups offering credit, cryptocurrencies, payments or general financial infrastructure services born in Latin America, according to Distrito’s report, which drew on support from SoftBank and Upload Ventures. That includes 403 in Mexico and 1,476 in Brazil.

Their combined share of outstanding credit in Brazil — about 4% — shows that many lending platforms have yet to gain momentum.

In an era of higher interest rates, legions of small ventures will struggle to get the additional capital they need to grow.

That gives an advantage to larger fintechs that have established funding sources, deposits from clients and the ability to adjust what they charge borrowers.

“The sheer magnitude of local interest rates tends to compensate for higher delinquency through the cycle and positions credit as one of the most valuable businesses for startups in Latin America,” said Pedro Pereira, head of technology investment banking for the region at Bank of America Corp.

Nubank, which pays savers about 11% for deposits, generated $815 million in net interest income in this year’s first quarter, more than double a year earlier.

Smaller fintechs that want to succeed in a world with less capital available will need a product “a thousand times superior to what already exists on the market,” and will probably have to cut costs and abandon projects that aren’t central to their strategy, Nubank CEO Velez said.

The shakeout also offers another big lesson: For a fintech to survive in Latin America it may need to act a bit like a traditional bank. Indeed, Nubank is emulating some aspects of the incumbents it once sought to challenge. Back then, it chided traditional lenders for offering interest rates that were about 50% higher.

“Something is really, really broken here,” Mr. Velez told Bloomberg in an interview in 2015, referring to rates as high as 500% on cards issued by big banks. “In a competitive market, you wouldn’t see those.”

‘NOT ALL WILL SURVIVE’
The arrival of fintechs set off an oversupply of credit in the region. Some previously unbanked consumers signed up for as many as six cards.

By the end of last year, almost half of nonbanks’ Brazilian credit-card customers had low incomes, compared with about a quarter at the big banks, according to a report from Fitch Ratings. A sharp rise in the nation’s benchmark interest rate to almost 14% from 2% in just 15 months hit those borrowers especially hard. Last week, the central bank started easing, cutting rates by 50 basis points to 13.25%.

Big lenders can adjust and weather the storm, said Pedro Carvalho, a Fitch analyst.

“Most at risk are the smallest fintechs,” he said. “One thing is certain: Not all will survive.”

Mercado Pago — offering loans, credit cards and a popular payments platform — accounted for about 44% of retailer MercadoLibre’s revenue in the second quarter, up from 31% a year earlier. Its $3.3-billion credit portfolio compares with Nubank’s $12.8 billion.

But Mercado Pago’s new lending is expected to decelerate in 2023’s more challenging environment, higher funding costs and increasing household indebtedness in Brazil. On Thursday MercadoLibre announced Chief Financial Officer  Pedro Arnt is leaving after two decades to pursue new opportunities. He will be replaced by Martin De Los Santos, a senior executive in its credit division.

Nubank wants to expand into the middle class, where competition with big banks is stronger, and in secured lending, such as payroll lending and credit with collateral, where delinquency rates are lower. Fintechs such as General Atlantic-backed Neon Pagamentos, a Brazilian unicorn that received a capital injection from Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria of $300 million last year, are also growing and competing for the same clients.

EXPANDING ABROAD
Other markets look tough, too.

Nubank, which generates 90% of its revenue in Brazil, faces risks with its effort to expand into Mexico. There, incumbent banks have already set up digital platforms to compete with fintechs, in some cases allowing them to operate more independently and enter strategic alliances, said Alejandro Tapia, another Fitch analyst. 

Banorte, Mexico’s second-biggest bank by loan portfolio, for example, partnered with ecommerce and Bogota-based delivery-service firm Rappi on a credit card. Argentine fintech Uala got regulatory approval to acquire Mexico’s ABC Capital Bank and expand operations in the country, launching a high-yield savings account. 

Mexico’s economy is more informal with credit-card transactions amounting to only 20% of the volume in Brazil, according to a report by Citigroup Inc. And its credit spreads are also much tighter, making it more difficult to compensate for loan losses. Four non-bank lenders defaulted over the past two years.

“Mexico is a country with great potential,” Nubank’s Velez said. “The opportunities are enormous, as service penetration is much lower – an estimated 60% of Mexicans are unbanked. But, as always, we have expanded our operation attentively and cautiously.”

FIRING THOUSANDS
Amid such challenges, many Latin American fintechs are adjusting course. They have fired more than 2,000 staff in the past 12 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That includes PagSeguro Digital Ltd., a provider of credit-card machines for small and midsize companies that eliminated about 500 positions, or 7% of its workforce.

One of the pioneers in unsecured loans to individuals in Brazil, Open Co., backed by SoftBank and LTS Investments, the family office of billionaires Lemann, Telles and Sicupira, recently announced a merger with BizCapital, which provides credit for small firms. Open Co. itself was already the result of a merger between Geru and Rebel.

Some banks are reintegrating their digital platforms or closing them. At Bradesco, digital bank Next was reincorporated into the bank and clients of its digital credit-card portfolio Bitz were invited to instead open an account at its other fintech, Digio. Banco Safra SA, Brazil’s eighth-biggest bank, integrated clients from its fintech AgZero to an internal digital account named Safra One.

Meanwhile, lower-income Brazilians who piled on too much debt are falling further behind, struggling to pay bills or rents, and in some cases opening credit lines with even higher interest rates as they try to make ends meet. Once interest payments get compounded their debt snowballs even further.

The political situation is now so intense that President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva recently announced a 50 billion-real fiscal stimulus to help lenders renegotiate unpaid debts. Banks that agree to forgive a portion of qualifying customers’ outstanding debts can get a tax credit of an equal amount.

Now, “when you see the data from the central bank, you realize that many fintechs charge clients with interest rates that are even bigger than banks,” said Isaac Sidney, president of Febraban, an association representing the big banks. “That’s no longer a trophy they can call theirs.” — Bloomberg

Does size matter?

GIORGIO TROVATO-UNSPLASH

Philippines Market Capitalization accounted for $309.985 billion in July 2023, compared with $300.014 billion in the previous month. It accounted for 75.2% of its Nominal GDP in December 2022, compared with a percentage of 93.2% in the previous year.

A comparison of the size of market capitalization of elected countries, which accompanies this column, is from www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/philippines/market-capitalization.

Does size matter? At the Ayala-FINEX Finance Summit “Reigniting the Philippine Capital Market towards a Sustainable Future” on Aug. 10, that was the bothersome question — why is the Philippines, which first opened its stock exchange in 1927, now so much smaller in the capital markets than its ASEAN neighbors Singapore, Indonesia, and Thailand?

A capital market is a financial market in which long-term debt (over a year) or equity-backed securities are bought and sold, in contrast to a money market where short-term debt is bought and sold. According to the Financial Times (FT), capital markets overtook bank lending as the leading source of long-term finance in 2009, reflecting the risk aversion and the tightening of bank regulation in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Proceeding from this observation by the FT, perhaps the same disenchantment with depository banks gave rise to investment banks and even regular banks who tailored their services to meet the re-directed needs of investors or borrowers for an underwriter or lead bank to organize a network of brokers to sell bonds or shares.

 

When raising long-term finance, Government will sell bonds in the capital markets, under the same protocols it had ordered for underwriting and syndication or brokerage. Companies choose between issuing bonds or shares to raise capital. In this situation, “from an investor’s point of view, shares offer the potential for higher returns and capital gains if the company does well. Conversely, bonds are safer if the company does poorly, as they are less prone to severe falls in price, and in the event of bankruptcy, bond owners may be paid something, while shareholders will receive nothing,” one analyst pointed out.

At the Ayala-FINEX conference, Pol de Win, Head of Global Sales and Origination of the Singapore Exchange (SGX), spoke on Asia’s most international, multi-asset exchange, and its operating environment that had fostered its successes in the capital markets. He pointed out that the government and the private sector plan and work together to achieve macro objectives prioritized over the micro goals of businesses. “Everybody gets to work together,” he said, and that is political will exercised in solidarity, to ensure sustainability. At the Q&A, Mr. De Win clarified that companies do not all go to the market for liquidity. Same for generational transitions (estate planning) — as market forces and opportunities maximize the best “deal” for the common All. Liquidity has costs — trading costs, but not taxes.

Francis Ed. Lim, Chairman of the FINEX Academy and Past FINEX President, spoke about the Philippine capital markets and the delayed, much-studied plans for its development. Mr. Lim was President, Chief Executive Office, and Director at Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc. and President and CEO of Securities Clearing Corp. of the Philippines (a subsidiary of the Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc.). He deplored that the Philippine capital market has not advanced since 2005 when the Capital Market Development Council was set up amid high hopes that the Philippines would zoom together with its ASEAN neighbors to take prominence as active leaders and movers of the global financial markets. It has been 20 years in the to-and-fro of recommendations and “Roadmaps” on the capital markets, and we have not moved forward. There is no political will. We have been overtaken by Thailand, Mr. Lim said.

And yet Vietnam has performed spectacularly, even if its market size is smaller than the Philippines’, Mr. De Win commented. “It is a controlled market in Vietnam; everything is controlled in Vietnam,” he said. But perhaps the secret for this small economy is its domestic focus. Contrary to the usual global financial competitive stance, Vietnam has a domestic focus that is micro-driven. “Companies must get something from investing in another,” Mr. De Win emphasized. With its prioritizing of its domestic markets, Vietnam has accelerated its growth by strengthening from the inside.

At the conference, Jaime Alfonso Zobel de Ayala spoke on the “Ayala Corp. investment opportunities and sustainable future.” “The Philippines has the lowest market turnover in Asia,” he said. “We might seem OK in general, but from a much lower base. We must grow and sustain that growth.” It might have been in response that Erwin Sta. Ana, Deputy Treasurer of the Bureau of the Treasury offered yet another “Philippine Capital Markets Roadmap” which outlined general fiscal and monetary plans of government in the post-COVID recovery.

On Feb. 7, the Philippine government raised an initial P162.180 billion in an auction of retail Treasury bonds (RTBs), the second under the Marcos administration. Tenders at the rate-setting auction hit P196.109 billion, or more than six times the P30 billion on offer at the BTr’s first retail bond offer this year. The five-and-a-half-year RTBs fetched a coupon rate of 6.125%, 37.5 basis points (bps) higher than the 5.75% set for the previous RTB offering in August 2022 (BusinessWorld, Feb. 8, 2023).

The government may launch a retail dollar bond offering in the third quarter of 2023, National Treasurer Rosalia V. de Leon said. The offer size will be around $2 billion (up from $1.5 billion earlier announced to be in May), surpassing its previous retail dollar bond issuance. The Philippines’ last retail dollar bond sale was in 2021, when it raised almost $1.6 billion or P80.91 billion. “We are looking for a more comfortable exchange rate. It’s a moving target, we’re now looking at the third quarter. We are planning this carefully, because otherwise we’ll be adding more debt,” she said. (BusinessWorld, May 15, 2023).

At the FINEX conference, hushed discussions at the lunch tables worried about “adding more debt” amidst the inflation and sticky prices still choking the economy. The peso-dollar exchange rate has not gone down from the P55.5+ per US dollar level, strangling debt repayments and massive imports. Are we to be excited with the government about the expanded opportunities to borrow and/or solicit investments in the global capital markets, when we know we have to attend to pressing issues and needs here first?

The example of Vietnam focusing first on its micro concerns and domestic urgencies seems a good suggestion. Vietnam has chosen to go slow and think out the more prudent and practical plans for its people. This was the way Singapore designed its spectacular rise as an independent and self-sufficient nation since it was expelled from Malaysia and became an independent republic on Aug. 9, 1965. Now tiny city-state Singapore is ranked No. 34 of the major economies and acknowledged to be the most competitive country in the world.

Size does not matter.

 

Amelia H. C. Ylagan is a doctor of Business Administration from the University of the Philippines.

ahcylagan@yahoo.com

Unconventional luxury brand collaborations are everywhere. What is the appeal?

AN OUTFIT from the Doraemon x Gucci collection. — GUCCI.COM

In 2017, Louis Vuitton caused a stir in the luxury industry by partnering with the New York skateboarding brand Supreme.

This collaboration became a milestone in the luxury industry, showcasing the potential of unexpected partnerships between luxury brands and an unconventional partner seemingly at the opposite end of the design spectrum, a street wear brand.

The iconic brand raised interest again when, in 2019, it partnered with the video game franchise League of Legends.

It may appear odd for a renowned French luxury design house and a game developer to team up. After all, their audiences are quite different. Whereas anyone with an internet connection can jump into a “free-to-play” game, few can afford a luxury brand.

So why are luxury brands collaborating with street brands, cartoons, and video games? Part of the reason is their success with young Asian consumers, who are driving demand for luxury consumer goods.

Given their growing importance for the luxury industry, we conducted a study of unconventional luxury brand collaborations. We wanted to investigate why this strategy appeals to Chinese luxury consumers of the post-1990s generation.

The study reveals potential opportunities for Australian brands, for instance, through partnerships with old-world luxury brands.

Luxury typically brings to mind ultra-expensive products such as yachts and private jets that are not within most people’s reach. However, there is another kind of luxury in which products that are not inherently expensive, like cosmetics, perfume, or even chocolate, can be luxurious through their brand’s prestige.

Business managers call this approach the luxury strategy. It has specific rules that luxury managers must follow. One of them is that luxury brands must remain above controversy, using aesthetics and tradition to signal exclusivity. Luxury brands are timeless because they resist the whims of fashion and don’t date.

New ways to convey exclusivity and uniqueness in digital and experiential contexts are emerging. For example, consumption experiences can feel like “a moment of luxury” if they convey a pleasurable escape from day-to-day routines.

As a result, new forms of luxury consumption, like second-hand luxury markets, are popping up.

While luxury brands are known to collaborate with artists, they have been pushing the boundaries of the luxury strategy by teaming up with unexpected non-luxury partners. One early example was between the Swedish fast-fashion retail outlet H&M and designer Karl Lagerfeld in 2004.

A partnership between a designer house and a fast-fashion retailer builds upon each other’s strengths, brand prestige, and mass distribution. However, luxury brands are growing more creative with their partnerships.

There are renowned luxury pairings like Fendi x Versace but also pairings with streetwear brands including Adidas x Gucci, with celebrities such as Kanye West x Louis Vuitton, animé characters like Doraemon x Gucci, and now video game franchises like Fortnite x Balenciaga.

These collaborations are becoming increasingly popular, especially with Chinese consumers.

Australian designers and producers of high-end goods must keep young adult Chinese consumers top of mind given the growing importance of Asian consumers in the luxury industry.

Reports by consulting agencies Bain & Company and McKinsey predicted that, by 2025, East Asia can become the world’s largest personal luxury goods market. China alone will consume about half the global market value of luxury goods.

In 2019, McKinsey reported that “Chinese consumers are now the engine of worldwide growth in luxury spending,” driven in part by consumers “born between 1980 and 2015 [who] are reshaping global luxury.”

Our study focused on the generational divide that is a uniquely Chinese phenomenon.

The 1990s economic reforms and China’s one-child policy shaped the generation. In 1979, a government program restricted (most) Chinese families to having one child each. The policy was updated to two children per family in 2016 and three in 2021.

During the 1990s, the media called lone children “little emperors” because they became the sole recipient of the family’s attention and financial support.

Analysts often subdivide the cohort into an affluent post-1980s generation consolidating their careers and a post-1990s generation characterized by urban lifestyle and social media savviness.

The post-1990s cohort of Chinese young adults, now in their 20s or early 30s, is characterized by their economic prowess, always-online presence, international mobility, and taste for luxury brands.

We find that Chinese luxury consumers of the post-1990s generation appreciate when luxury brands collaborate with non-luxury partners seemingly at the opposite spectrum of design, image and values. These collaborations are exciting when they are ephemeral, trendy, and playful.

Ephemeral collaborations are transitory, existing only for a limited time, and will not reappear. Trendy collaborations help consumers navigate the ebbs and flows of social media to capture novelty and hype. Playful collaborations appeal to a youthful audience by mocking traditions and not being too serious.

In the words of one of our respondents, “Most of my friends in China like these collaborations […] Sometimes they are like: ‘Oh! Wow, your limited edition! Where? How did you get this? Oh my gosh! You must have connections.”

Collaborations are instantly recognizable in social media. When asked why purchase a collaboration, a respondent said: “Selfies (giggles). I mean, I am going to take a selfie with it. You must post it! (giggles). Others will see it and ask me how I got it.”

The popularity of unconventional luxury brand collaborations among young adult Chinese consumers opens timely strategic opportunities for Australian designers and producers of high-end goods.

The young adult Chinese segment remains important in Australia because of its purchasing power and influence in redefining luxury. By seeking collaborations that are ephemeral, trendy and playful, Australian brands can meet this segment’s preferences and adapt to the changing rules of luxury.

Australian brands can also position themselves as attractive partners for fresh collaborations. As global luxury brands seek partners who, in the words of one of our study participants, “bring something new to break through old-fashioned limits,” Aussie brands can offer just that.

Upcoming Australian designers are known for their effortless elegance, down-to-earth aesthetics, and their values of sustainability and ethics, making them great potential partners for luxury brands.

Aussie brands and consumers are intrepid innovators in outdoor gear and adventure activities, like water sports, offering hype, trendiness, and authenticity.

This sets Aussie brands up well to enter the coveted luxury market, gaining a foothold in the fast-growing Chinese market and opening opportunities worldwide. — The Conversation via Reuters Connect

 

Carlos Diaz Ruiz is an Assistant Professor at the Hanken School of Economics while Angela Cruz is a Senior Lecturer in Marketing, Monash University.