Home Blog Page 9858

Flexible offices to help workers deal with housework

A GOVERNMENT think tank is recommending flexible work arrangements, including a four-day work week, in part to help couples better deal with their housework obligations.

The Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) said in a policy note published Wednesday that “a large percentage” of both men and women who are 25-59 years old consider housework to be a main reason for not seeking work, with more females, both single and married, giving this answer more than their male counterparts.

Citing a separate study, PIDS said around 82% of women reported having to interrupt work because of housework between 2003 and 2009, “adversely” impacting a woman’s position in the labor force.

“A clear understanding of the effects of care work and unpaid work on the interruptions in market work can help in strengthening programs for labor market re-entrants and in strengthening policies for work-family life balance,” it said.

It said valuing unpaid work does not necessarily require compensation which is considered a “fleeting solution” since market work or jobs outside the home are inevitable once children grow and housework needs levels off. Paying compensation for housework may also result in possible leakages, unintended consequences, and strains on public funds.

Instead, PIDS recommended policies to “accommodate the realities of unpaid work,” including the use of digital labor platforms to enable workers to carry out service jobs online.

“Meanwhile, training can be provided so that skills required for these opportunities are developed,” it said.

According to the study, “a four-day work week in the public sector is a good starting point” for the government to experiment with, as more legislation is needed to institutionalize flexible time (flexi-time) for companies.

Another option for the government is an incentive scheme for working couples with preschool children who fall under a determined income bracket.

“An example of an incentive scheme that can be explored is by making a portion of child care receipts (e.g., day-care services, payment of nanny wages) deductible from the income of couples in the lowest taxable income bracket or by providing subsidies to tax-exempt workers,” it said.

PIDS said the government should also improve child-care services operating within the eight-hour office period to encourage mothers to go back to work after giving birth, as well as a system for elderly care to address the ageing population.

“Fast and reliable mass transportation is also a key to reducing the burden of unpaid work while fast, cheap, and reliable Internet can help men and women work from home,” it added.

The study argued for valuing unpaid work since it has positive consequences, particularly as stay-home parents, particularly mothers, “play a big role in fostering a good learning environment especially during the children’s early years in life when all types of development take place.”

Housework or “unpaid work” includes caregiving for young and old people as well as cooking, washing and cleaning.

While some choose unpaid work at home as they find fulfillment in raising their children, PIDS said others, however, “do not have the luxury of choice.”

“Unpaid work for them is a life’s task assigned by gender roles so when push comes to shove, they opt out of the labor market. The society then misses out on their contribution and this is a compelling reason for recognizing the value of unpaid work.” — Beatrice M. Laforga

China paralysis seen affecting PHL tech sector — S&P Global

THE RECOVERY of the technology sector after the US-China trade war “hangs in the balance” as the coronavirus outbreak threatens manufacturing hubs in China, S&P Global said in a report.

In its “Coronavirus: A Wide-Ranging Ill For Tech Supply Chain” report, S&P Global said that the effect of the outbreak on the sector could be extensive as factories shut down and underutilization lowers global output of tech components, sub-assemblies, and finished goods.

Notebook manufacturers were considering moving their manufacturing and assembly capacities from China to Southeast Asia following US-China tensions.

“However, we do not believe this has taken place quick enough for notebook OEMs (original-equipment manufacturers) such as Dell Technologies, Inc. and HP, Inc. to absolve them from potential supply chain disruptions from the outbreak,” according to the report.

S&P expects a slowdown in notebook sales, but characterizes the situation as representing delayed rather than lost sales.

The report said that the impact of the epidemic on hardware companies in Asia depends on their exposure to the hardware supply chain, as electronics component companies face labor and logistics challenges.

The semiconductor sector is seeing less disruption, the report said, adding that the Chinese government is expected to assist the tech sector to normalize operations.

“However, bottlenecks throughout the supply chain will inevitably affect near-term shipments and revenue.”

The S&P report said the virus could trim 30 basis points (bps) from global GDP (gross domestic product) this year, along with a decline of 70 bps in China’s GDP growth.

Under the assumption that the effects of the virus stabilizes by March 2020, S&P expects the peak effect on China’s economy to take place in the first quarter, with a rebound in the third quarter before lost output is largely recovered by the end of 2021.

Philippine exporters recently said factory closures in China will heavily impact trade, with Semiconductor and Electronics Industries in the Philippines, Inc. (SEIPI) president Danilo C. Lachica saying that the outbreak lowered the industry’s 2020 export growth projection to 3% from 5%.

Trade Secretary Ramon M. Lopez has said the effects on exporters can be minimized by finding alternative sources of supply.

He said exports to Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, represent 0.5% of Philippine exports to China. Imports from the province make up around 1.2% of the total. Total trade with Hubei comprises 0.9% of trade with China. — Jenina P. Ibañez

Bill to make business permit approval conditional on 13th month salary payment

LEGISLATORS filed a bill making business permit approval conditional on complying with the legal requirement to pay 13th month salaries.

ACT-CIS Party List representatives Jocelyn P. Tulfo, Eric G. Yap and Rowena Niña O. Taduran filed House Bill 6272 Wednesday, citing a need to improve 13th month pay compliance.

“In HB 6272 the Department of Labor regional offices are mandated to review the 13th month pay compliance report. If deficiencies are found, the applicant is given five business days to rectify. Non-payment of 13th month pay becomes cause for cancellation of the business permit,” Ms. Tulfo said in a statement Thursday.

Ms. Tulfo said that businesses that do not provide 13th month pay to their employees will have their permits cancelled.

Pinapaganda natin ang sistema. Kapag ‘di nagbabayad ng 13th month pay, kanselado ang business permit. May kopya ang DoLE ng compliance report kaya malalaman nila kung sino ang masunurin sa batas at sino ang hindi (We’re trying to improve the system. Non-payment of 13th month pay will mean cancellation of the business permit. DoLE will have a copy of the compliance report so we will know who is following the law and who is not),” Ms. Tulfo said, adding that “financially distressed” employers will be exempted from the rule.

The bill “codifies the necessary rules on the payment of 13th month pay and provides for a deterrent effect to those employers who willfully or negligently fail in their obligation to pay the mandatory benefit,” according to the bill’s explanatory note.

Those entitled to 13th month pay are all rank-and-file employees or domestic workers who have worked for at least one month during the calendar year.

The measure also provides that 13th month pay “not be credited as part of the regular wage of the employees for purposes of determining overtime and premium pay, fringe benefits, as well as premium contributions to the social security system, health insurance contribution, or any private welfare and retirement plans.” — Charmaine A. Tadalan

In the coronavirus era, ‘We don’t know’ is defensible

By Daniel Moss

CENTRAL BANKERS from Sydney to Washington are confessing they don’t know how big the economic dent from the coronavirus will be. This is more encouraging than you might think.

In the post-Great Recession era of forward guidance, quarterly forecasts and inflation targets, investors demanded clarity and have grown used to getting it. It’s understandably jarring to hear senior officials say they are taking things day-by-day or changing tack abruptly.

On Tuesday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told a congressional committee that the virus will “very likely” have some effect on the US, and he’s waiting to see whether it leads to a “material reassessment of the outlook.” Just two weeks earlier, when the Fed kept rates on hold, its statement made no mention of the outbreak. At a subsequent press conference, Powell said it was among “uncertainties” in the forecast.

In Australia, Alexandra Heath, head of economic analysis at the Reserve Bank, said Wednesday that the virus probably isn’t just a passing shock before “everything goes back to normal.” She added: “Something that we don’t have in here, and is a very serious downside risk to the forecasts, is that we haven’t really taken into account that China sits in the middle of a lot of supply chains.”

Beyond the bewildering admission that the RBA failed to consider China’s role in the web of global trade, the statement stands in stark contrast to comments last week when the central bank kept rates unchanged. In its review of the global economy, the RBA said that while the coronavirus will have a big effect on China, it’s too soon to gauge how long that will last.

Three days later, RBA Governor Philip Lowe told legislators that the risks are probably greater than the 2003 outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. If the rate of infection slows, he said, “there are reasonable prospects of a quick bounce back.” It’s worth noting that Australia is one the developed world’s most China-dependent nations; a famous three-decade expansion is partly explained by mainland demand for the country’s raw materials.

It’s tempting to see these comments as flip-flops, but let’s cut the Fed and the RBA some slack. Is there anyone, anywhere who can say with conviction how the epidemic will evolve or how it will affect the economies of China and its commercial partners? As the virus spreads, society will inevitably look to central bankers and health experts for certitude. Yet with a rapidly evolving outbreak, a 24-hour news cycle and the ferocious metabolism of social media, it’s impossible to get things right all the time. Better, then, to simply be honest: We just don’t know.

I’m not advocating obfuscation or, on the other end of the spectrum, WeChat messages prefaced by “DISPEL RUMOR” with an emoji of a fist, as the People’s Bank of China has been known to post. As long as officials tell us they’re aware of the gravity, they’re on the case and trying to get a handle on events before responding, that should be acceptable — for a while. The times when central bankers need to maintain the visage of the all-wise and all-knowing have passed: Nimbleness of thought and word should become the new benchmark. What’s counterproductive is acknowledging there will be economic damage and then sounding sanguine, as I wrote last week.

We’re already starting to see the benefits of tracking thoughts in real time. Officials contemplating rate cuts appear to be edging toward doing so. Powell’s comments linking the virus fallout to the question of a “material reassessment” are significant. They suggest the outbreak doesn’t have to actually hurt the US economy for the Fed to take action, it just needs to alter the prognosis. Historically, that phrase has been used sparingly.

Let’s give the RBA’s Heath, a respected senior staffer, some time to calibrate and points for candor. Both she and Powell could have been smoother. But, in their own ways, they’ve given us a taste of the future. This is one of those times when it’s fine to be a little bit human.

 

BLOOMBERG OPINION

More lethal than COVID-19

He has made the police his security guards and the military his private army, while both remain cogs in the killing machine that keeps him and his ilk in power and things the way they are and have always been. He controls both houses of Congress and has the Supreme Court majority for accomplices. Unscrupulous judges and even worse lawyers have surrendered their independence to speak for him and do his bidding.

His word is law to a corrupt civilian bureaucracy whose interests he has carefully nurtured to ensure their unquestioning support. He often sings paeans to independence and national sovereignty. But in addition to his own, he has made the political, economic, and strategic interests of his patrons in imperialist China as dominant in this country as those of the ruling circles of the United States.

He has unleashed on this country an unprecedented level of unchecked and unaccountable State violence as the simplistic “solution” to its most complex problems. With hardly anyone objecting, he has appropriated for himself, his family, and his cronies, and at the expense of the health, education, and welfare of the poor, the predator’s share of the national budget that’s sourced from the people’s taxes.

A de facto, populist dictatorship already rules these isles of fear and uncertainty. But if human rights defenders and other advocacy groups are correct, the worst is yet to come.

A report on the 2019 human rights situation in the Philippines quotes the Bangkok-based research and advocacy group Focus on the Global South’s warning that the Duterte regime is intent on expanding its already vast powers, purportedly so President Rodrigo Duterte “may effectively address corruption and all other problems born out of it.”

That message, says the Philippine Human Rights Information Center’s report, “The Killing State,” was implicit in Mr. Duterte’s 2019 State of the Nation Address (SONA), in which he admitted that his administration had failed to eradicate corruption. He declared in the same speech that his powers to do so are limited. In response, his cronies have proposed that he assume emergency powers to cope with corruption and even Manila’s traffic problems.

Mr. Duterte has since blamed the persistence of corruption on due process and the country’s democratic institutions, implying thereby that corruption could be eradicated only when State agencies ignore and dispense with such legal niceties as the right to a fair trial. But as the entire planet knows by now, the Duterte regime has been doing exactly that in its sham campaign against illegal drugs. That “war” has extrajudicially killed tens of thousands of the poor. It has also left behind it countless widows and orphans whose limited chances of survival have created a humanitarian crisis the regime doesn’t even care to acknowledge.

There are other indicators of Mr. Duterte’s obsession with absolute power, notes the report. Among them is his drive to restore the death penalty despite the Philippines’ ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in 2007. Several bills that would do that have been filed by his agents and henchmen in both houses of Congress even if the restoration of the death penalty will be in violation of the ICCPR, which requires signatory states to respect the fundamental human right to life.

In the context of the far-from-perfect Philippine justice system, in which wealth and power often decide who is guilty or innocent, the restoration of the death penalty is also likely to be one more instrument against the poor and powerless as well as regime critics, to silence whom, as the regime has demonstrated in many instances, a legion of outlandish charges can be manufactured.

As if this were not enough, the report also points out that amendments to the already oppressive and misnamed Human Security Act — whose definition of “terrorism” includes any act hampering the operations of public utilities — will further strengthen the primacy of State power over human rights by, among others, permitting the detention without charges of suspected “terrorists” for 14 days. Sponsored by the most vocal advocates of the police state, a bill that precisely mandates that is also pending and likely to pass.

But these are only the more flagrant but misleading indicators of the continuing drive to dictatorship. Despite the likelihood of their approval by the supposedly independent Congress, they can be misconstrued and dismissed as aberrations sponsored solely by Mr. Duterte’s more fanatical partisans rather than as part of a plot to complete the return to authoritarian rule.

What has been mostly unremarked is the unrelenting conspiracy to amend or change the Charter altogether, despite public opposition to it, so as to endow with constitutional legitimacy such other regressive, anti-human rights, self-serving and treacherous proposals as the savaging of the Bill of Rights and the abolition of the anti-dynasty provisions of the 1987 Constitution. Equally under threat are those articles in the same basic document prohibiting foreign ownership of the mass media, and which prevent foreign professionals from practicing in the Philippines.

To these threats to life, liberty, human rights, and the national patrimony, the majority of Filipinos shrug their shoulders in indifference. Some even support tyranny and the march to strongman rule. They welcome the impending return of the death penalty, and join the chorus of hate against human rights defenders, the political opposition, and progressive churchmen and women. Mr. Duterte’s repeated threats to kill, kill, kill the perceived enemies of his regime, whether businessmen, bishops, or political activists, they applaud with shouts of glee.

They despise civility, intelligence, logic, and reason. Whether misinformed, blissfully and unknowingly ignorant, or misled by the heralds of those interests that seek a repetition of the country’s descent into an authoritarian outrage worse than the Marcos kleptocracy, the poorest as well as the presumptively educated think democracy a failure and those who espouse and defend it their enemies. They disparage reformists and critics of the incompetent and corrupt rule of the bureaucrat capitalists who use political power to enrich themselves, and celebrate those traitors as the country’s saviors.

The result of this cluelessness and indifference to the common good is the country’s continuing underdevelopment and millions of Filipinos’ rapid descent into the bottomless pit of poverty, hunger, injustice, and mass misery. An information crisis abetted by the regime’s “fake news” hucksters is among the forces behind it all. But there is as well the unwillingness and refusal by too many of the men and women who care only for themselves to heed the facts and to learn from the past. In its place is a version of reality and history drawn from the colonial and feudal traditions and fomented by the self-aggrandizing dynasties that rule them today as brutally and as uncaringly as the Spanish conquistadores did.

It explains why, despite the facts, eyewitness accounts, and the mountain of evidence to the contrary, even supposedly educated Filipinos hail the Marcos dictatorship as a golden age, despite its denying their forebears their right to govern themselves — which they prefer over the sovereign duty of assuming the responsibilities of democratic rule.

Driven by their contempt for what they think is democracy in this country of illusions, the preference for authoritarian rule is a virus that has long been resident in the brains of generations. Hence the continuing threat, and now the awful reality, of a national contagion of despotism far more lethal than any coronavirus. Against it only a free people’s unity and resistance can prevail. But there’s the rub, for there is so very, very little evidence of either.

 

Luis V. Teodoro is on Facebook and Twitter (@luisteodoro).

www.luisteodoro.com

An attitude or vice?

In literature and history, the heroes Othello and Antony were noble, brave, and ingenious. However, their virtues were the cause of envy among their colleagues. In modern times, the outstanding individuals who excel in the fields of science, art, business, law, academe, and public service trigger pinpricks or gnawing pangs of jealousy.

The seven sins are Pride, Greed, Sloth, Lust, Anger, Hate, and Envy.

Hate has always been considered the opposite of the virtue Love. However, Envy is worse. “Whenever a friend succeeds, a little something in me dies,” Gore Vidal wrote.

Successful, beautiful, popular, accomplished, noble and multi-awarded persons often provoke envy — mild or vicious. The degree varies in the spectrum according to the extent of recognition.

The famous individual is a target of envy. It is, in fact, celebrity’s only contingency. It is the means of definition, especially now that talent is no longer a requirement. What would be the point — if not to induce “Gore Vidal-levels of hatred” in his peers?

The defensive reaction could be, “You’re nobody until somebody hates you.” (Or so the envied person likes to think.)

Hate is corrosive, violent and destructive. It is also righteous at times. One can say that he hates injustice or cruelty. It is justified in this context.

In real life, a conceited narcissist likes to fantasize that someone he/she has envied, has in fact, been envious of him/her.

The monster has had a long masculine heritage. But could it be that Envy might be a “woman thing?”

The vice is non-gender specific. It afflicts many people, especially those who are insecure and have personality conflicts and low self-esteem.

Envious friends can be weeded out and should be replaced. The safer alternative would be to reach a level of envy-management. It is wise to have relationships wherein feelings of envy can be diplomatically exchanged rather than hoarded by one person.

To illustrate, among friends, there are subtle comments on status opposites. A child vs. an adult. Talent vs. will. Material success vs. psychic fulfillment. Fame vs. privacy.

In modern society, the old sins are no longer vices. Everything is relative. Some things are called archaic. Pride is often considered a virtue. Anger is justifiable or contingent on the situation. Sloth, lust, and gluttony are tendencies that may not be necessarily “vile.”

Greed is so common that it barely troubles the conscience. It is kept conveniently under the category, “It’s a Free Market Democratic Society.”

“Where love (in its ideal form) seeks out the good for its own sake, envy not only refuses the good but resents it, attempts to destroy it… It cannot conceive of a good that exists external to its own desires,” a wise counselor observed.

The only things worth envying are the things that cannot be possessed: Natural talent, natural beauty, and goodness.

A social scientist once met an extraordinary singer with the such wonderful qualities. Her own feeling of resentment — that anyone could sound and look so great, overwhelmed her. But she also felt a sudden admiration of the singer and what could be described as “a moment of love.”

One of ethical challenges of adulthood is to learn how to handle “envy-management.”

Famous individuals are perceived to have everything. There are friends who seem to do everything perfectly. Without meaning to stir the atmosphere, they cause ripples or waves. They are natural magnets who attract both admiration and envy.

Celebrity and fame provoke intrigue, controversy, and other effects. Being in the limelight has its glory but it has a downside. It draws out the sharp claws, sharp tongues, and caustic comments.

What is more difficult to understand is how some “well-meaning friends” can appear concerned. They give “helpful” advice that is actually hurtful. Deep inside, they nurse secret resentments that fester like raw sores that never heal.

Occasionally, when a good friend achieves a cherished goal or a well-deserved reward — big or small — the nastiness can suddenly erupt in the other friend. It could be in the form of a left-handed or insincere compliment. It is a curve ball that is cleverly disguised to sting. It may be so subtle that one realizes the damage only much later. Such behavior bursts the illusion of camaraderie and it exposes the concealed real and raw feelings.

Envy undermines and erodes many friendships. In the end, it diminishes the envious person.

Iris Murdoch defined ideal love as “the proper recognition that other people actually exist.”

When we love, we are given a glimpse of a universe that does not revolve around the self. We are able to understand and accept that other people are not merely props on our own great stage.

 

Maria Victoria Rufino is an artist, writer and businesswoman. She is president and executive producer of Maverick Productions.

mavrufino@gmail.com

When love was seductive

Today, of course, is Valentine’s Day. Unfortunately, this year, it fell on a Friday, which by some sad coincidence is also payday. Hopefully, Carmaggedon won’t rear its ugly head.

As it happens, the film version of The Sound of Music is celebrating its 55th anniversary this year. The movie contains many marvelous sequences, from the “Lonely Goatherd” to “Do-Re-Mi.” However, in today’s hook-up culture, cynicism, disdain for masculinity, and #MeToo into an oppressive fascistic silencing tool, “16 Going on 17” seems specially touching and yearnful.

The iconic segment actually starts not with the song but with this exchange:

Rolfe: Dear Liesl [narrating an imaginary telegram] “I would like to tell you how I feel about you STOP Unfortunately, this wire is already too expensive Sincerely, Rolfe.”

Liesl: [Offended] “Sincerely?”

Rolfe: “Cordially?”

Liesl: [Turns away] “Cordially?”

Rolfe: “Affectionately?”

At that answer, Liesl (played by Charmian Carre) embraces Rolfe (Daniel Truhitte). They go on to talk of other things. Then Liesl says something that makes Rolfe tease her: “You’re such a baby!”

Liesl, of course, protests, but Rolfe continues:

“You wait, little girl, on an empty stage

For fate to turn the light on

Your life, little girl, is an empty page

That men will want to write on.”

It’s easy to dismiss the song as mere musical “mansplaining,” of Rolfe lecturing about life to a “naÏve” Liesl, and how she needs him to survive. But the song’s composers, Richard Rogers and Oscar Hammerstein were not — thankfully — of this era.

Rogers and Hammerstein knew sexual politics, understood relationships, the ages, and — despite the sappiness and saccharine which the Sound of Music has been accused of — had a clear-eyed view of men and women.

That they conveyed the realism of the relationship between women and men in such an elegantly subtle manner is both the Sound of Music’s greatness and curse: ethereally hopeful but oftentimes impenetrable for today’s audiences.

There is no toxic cisgender masculinity here predatorily hunting a woman. If there was a “hunter” in “16 Going On 17” it was not definitely not Rolfe. Neither was it Liesl.

It was both of them.

On equal footing, each doing their part in a dance in accord with who they are: as woman and man.

One sees this in Liesl’s response to Rolfe’s condescension: “To write on…,” Liesl coos seductively at Rolfe. The latter backs off, disguising obvious nervousness by resorting to his supposed seniority. Naivety is indeed revealed but clearly it is not with Liesl.

Rolfe may have the years and physical strength on his side, but maturity is with Liesl.

And they knew what they were doing: both moving to an even more secluded and private gazebo to continue their courtship.

Rolfe was never in charge. It only seems so. For every childishly proud declaration by Rolfe, Liesl would lead him back to do the right thing — sometimes subtly with her demureness but overtly if needed.

One sees that in the dance’s latter part, Liesl standing on the benches looking down on Rolfe, the latter happily looking up at her. Adoring her.

There would be a part where Liesl brushes Rolfe’s hair and Rolfe loses himself in her. He was — literally — in Liesl’s hands.

The sequence would end with Liesl, her hand held by Rolfe, dancing carefreely around the gazebo’s benches, until finally, something interesting happens: they both find themselves standing on level ground, staring at each other. Drawn together, they come close face to face. They pull away but then end right back together. This happens a couple of times.

Then he kisses her.

But that’s the thing: it was the one act in the entire sequence where Rolfe actually took the lead. And he took the lead because Liesl wanted him to.

This is important because it establishes a point that whole millennia of women and men inherently understood but today’s generations seemingly can’t comprehend: there are women and men, that women and men are equal but different, and their differences are complementary to each other.

The song “16 Going On 17” dramatizes that perfectly: there are no victims, no oppressor: Liesl and Rolf were simultaneously leading each other and are being led by each other. That they can do so and it works because they were doing it as a man and woman.

If indeed one has to be finicky about it, the one showing that touch of frailty was Rolfe: unable to contain his emotion at the immensity of what just happened, their first kiss, he runs off grinning. Liesl stands put, looking after him, and also smiling. Both are happy.

In the end, we know that Liesl and Rolfe would be separated. Politics getting in the way.

But perhaps that’s another lesson: take the politics out and let men be men and women be women. And let the dance end as it should: of men and women completing each other.

 

Jemy Gatdula is a Senior Fellow of the Philippine Council for Foreign Relations and a Philippine Judicial Academy law lecturer for constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence.

https://www.facebook.com/jigatdula/

Twitter @jemygatdula

Being in the picture

By Tony Samson

PICTURES, now increasingly digital and posted in social media, record an event and who were there (if they did not leave the event too early). Being in a photo proves that one was at the event, not necessarily to lead it or even to influence what happened. The inclusion in the group shot is an opportunity to brag about connections — is this why these are called photo opportunities (or photo ops)?

Photos publicize otherwise mundane events like the ground-breaking for a new condo building (personalities with hard hats on heads, and in their hands, shovels with ribbons in the pretend act of digging into a prescribed square of ground), donations to worthy causes (shaking hands in front of a billboard-sized check to specify the donation’s amount), and a group caucus on the dangers of racial profiling in connection with epidemics.

With smart phones, the photo ops have logarithmically intensified. The selfie has become a genre of photo moments where the photographer is also in the frame, usually with a celebrity accosted for the purpose — she was just shopping in the mall, with a face mask.

The old “firing squad” photo of a wedding couple with their entourage at the altar steps is giving way to poses of unrestrained glee. The now routine poses involve flung arms, sly looks at the shutter, and generally gravity-defying poses which can be held for five seconds. The implied message proclaims: we are not a boring couple and our friends are even nuttier.

Is it time to introduce this same sense of frolic for photo moments in business settings? After all, annual reports which will be coming out in waves in the coming weeks already allow group pictures in unlikely settings like the CEO and his team inside large pipes for infra projects and mountain climbing in a team-building exercise for the board.

Visibility is now one of the leadership attributes as once enshrined in the iconic (but perhaps now a bit dated) book In Search of Excellence (1982) by Tom Peters and Robert Waterman, Jr. which tracked 43 excellent companies. A few of these, like Atari, Texas Instruments, and Hewlett Packard, have since disappeared from the corporate scene.

The prescription for management by walking around (MBWA) required managers to walk randomly around the office to show visible leadership (or an annoying pestering of people trying to work). So, executives making the rounds and dropping in for coffee with the staff may be a new photo op — I brought some doughnuts.

Visible leadership in the handling of border closures, quarantines, and the handing out of face masks are part of the epidemic’s news coverage of leaders — is he cowering in the palace afraid of contagion?

A visible political leadership in disaster relief, terrorist attack (afterwards), and even the inauguration of a plant to project a friendliness to business investors in the country are part of the job description. These ceremonial events become visible commitments to the common welfare.

A photo release in media later can be accompanied by an article on the event as well as the caption on the people in the photo (including an unidentified guest — second from left). The release may record an event that happened some time back, so no longer significant for its news value. It only matters that someone was in the picture.

Photo ops are no longer limited to people. Lately, houses of non-celebrities (somewhere in Alabang) are popping up. These shots of colorful sofas and paintings of well-known artists against white walls are unadorned by people. Still, they provide a cache’ for the classier set. Magazines that feature architecture and décor are bought in commercial quantities and casually left on top of the coffee table — the same one in the photo, My Dear.

Anticipating the not-too-distant national elections, photo ops are sought by potential candidates and their handlers. The best ones require no caption to track the busy schedule and good health of a leader visiting his constituency and showing up for speaking engagements, after a good nap. What about billboards along the busy highway featuring a mayor in denims? Everything is fair game for the visibility index to rise.

Unlike video (with sound) the photo op does not carry invectives and unprovoked attacks on absent targets. Pictures without words only show what the leader appears to be doing or at least where he’s been… even for a few minutes.

 

Tony Samson is Chairman and CEO, TOUCH xda.

ar.samson@yahoo.com

Parasite Oscars say a lot about South Korea

By Noah Smith

ON SUNDAY NIGHT, there was widespread rejoicing when the South Korean film Parasite received the Academy Award for best picture along with several other awards. Not only was this the first such win for a movie in a language other than English, but to many it represented a long-sought victory for Korean popular culture.

It’s not the first such victory. In the past decade, Korean music and TV shows have exploded in global popularity. The Korean band BTS is the first since the Beatles to release three Billboard No. 1 albums in a single year. Their US concerts are wildly popular, and their fandom transcends both region and ethnicity. China is crazy for K-pop, too. And Korean drama programs, already hugely popular across East Asia, are making inroads around the world.

But the Korean wave isn’t just a global cultural fad; it’s the capstone of a unique and remarkable national growth story.

Many countries that are rich and industrialized today once possessed colonial empires from which they extracted vast amounts of natural resources. A handful of others are European states, such as Switzerland, that avoided being colonized themselves. But Korea never had an empire, and it was a Japanese colony from 1910 until 1945. Shortly after the end of that period of subjugation, the entire peninsula was devastated by the Korean War. In 1960, South Korea’s per capita gross domestic product was about $1,000 in today’s dollars — about the same as modern-day Ethiopia.

At first it seemed as if North Korea would outshine its more capitalist neighbor to the south. It recovered faster after the war, and in 1964 economist Joan Robinson was gushing with praise for what she called the North Korean “miracle.” But about that same time, South Korea’s fortunes turned around after military dictator Park Chung-hee took power in a 1961 coup.

Many dictators loot their countries for themselves and their cronies. But Park was different. Although politically repressive, he focused his efforts on turning South Korea into a technologically advanced, economically powerful country. Park established effective bureaucracies, such as the Economic Planning Board and the Ministry of Trade and Industry, to direct the country’s economy.

Park didn’t care whether a policy was capitalist or socialist as long as it served his industrial policy goals. Believing that a domestic steel industry was important for development, he created a state-owned steel company called POSCO. He nationalized banks. Though he allowed business conglomerates called chaebol to grow large and powerful, Park constantly reminded business leaders that they were subordinate to the government, requiring executives to report to him personally and even tossing some in jail for corruption.

Above all, Park sought to increase exports. Companies that sold goods overseas were rewarded with cheap credit and various subsidies. As author Joe Studwell and others have documented, this export focus forced South Korean companies out of the cozy domestic market and into the hypercompetitive global arena, where they faced off against top industrial powers such as Japan and the US. Becoming internationally competitive required Korean companies to copy foreign technologies, and it brought in teams of overseas experts or hired retired engineers from overseas.

Park’s strategy wasn’t without its limitations and failures. Slowing growth and Park’s repressive governance led to discontent in the 1970s, and Park was assassinated in 1979. But the country turned out not to depend so much on the vision of one man. Growth powered ahead, and the country became a democracy in 1987 after a wave of protests. Ten years later, the International Monetary Fund began to classify South Korea as an “advanced nation.”

As of today, South Korea is indisputably a prosperous nation. In addition to its growing cultural clout, it is technologically advanced, boasting (among other things) the world’s most successful electronics company and one of the top automakers. That excellence looks likely to continue, as South Korea spends more of its economic output on research than its most advanced rivals.

Three generations after its decolonization, 67 years after being devastated by war, this resource-poor country now has living standards that almost rival that of the UK, whose empire once covered more than a quarter of the planet.

South Korea still has many challenges: A few big companies dominate the economy, and it’s too dependent on China as a market and as a production base. Women too often are excluded from corporate and political power, its social safety net needs strengthening and its population is rapidly aging.

Yet South Korea’s rise has demonstrated something absolutely astounding: that the dead hand of colonialism need no longer rule the destiny of a modern nation. Going from poverty to riches wasn’t easy; some of the countries hoping to follow in South Korea’s footsteps, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh and Ethiopia, will inevitably stumble in that quest. But South Korea is proof of the concept — a singular success, serving as a beacon of hope and ideas to the fast-growing nations of tomorrow.

And providing some entertaining movies and music, too.

 

BLOOMBERG OPINION

Philippines to face Indonesia in men’s quarterfinals of Badminton Asia tourney

MOMENTS after Chinese Taipei took down Singapore in the men’s side, the draw for the quarterfinals phase of Badminton Asia Team Championships happened on Thursday at the VIP Lounge of Rizal Memorial Coliseum.

First-time qualifier and host Philippines drew top-seed and Southeast Asian rival Indonesia.

The Philippines ended as Group C runner-up, while Indonesia emerged as Group A winner after a 4-1 rout of Korea.

Group C winner Chinese Taipei will battle Group D second-placer Japan, while Korea will take on Malaysia, which took the Group B two-tie sweep. India, Group B runner-up, and Thailand wrap up the men’s pairings.

On the women’s side, reigning champion Japan (Group W winner) will face Indonesia, the Group Y runner-up, in the last eight, while Group X top-seed Korea got another Southeast Asian country in Singapore.

The other pairings put Group Z winner Chinese Taipei against Malaysia, and Group Y sweeper Thailand getting Kazakhstan.

The women’s ties are scheduled at 10 a.m., while the men’s matches will start at 4 p.m. in this tournament backed by Smart Communications, Inc., MVP Sports Foundation, Leisure and Resorts World Corporation, Cignal, and TV5.

Jazz defeat Heat, run winning streak to four

SALT LAKE CITY — Donovan Mitchell scored a game-high 26 points, and Bojan Bogdanovic added 22 points, leading the Utah Jazz to a 116-101 win over the Miami Heat on Wednesday night in Salt Lake City.

Jordan Clarkson had 21 points off the bench for the Jazz, who have won four straight games. The Jazz improved to 20-5 at home, including 9-0 against Eastern Conference teams.

Jazz center Rudy Gobert, a two-time NBA Defensive Player of the Year, added 16 points, two blocks and a game-high 20 rebounds. Gobert and Mitchell, both first-time All-Stars this year, were honored before the game by the Jazz.

Miami, which finished a 1-4 road trip, was led by Jimmy Butler’s 25 points.

Duncan Robinson scored all 18 of his points by making six 3-pointers in 13 attempts. He became the first player in Heat history to make at least five three-pointers in four consecutive games.

Miami’s Jae Crowder, who played 107 games for the Jazz from 2017 to 2019, got a big ovation from Utah’s fans when he entered the game in the third quarter. Crowder finished with 15 points.

Miami was without two members of its rotation due to ankle injuries: starter Meyers Leonard and rookie reserve Tyler Herro. Together, they average 19.2 points, including 13.1 by Herro.

Utah was without starting point guard Mike Conley, who missed his second straight game due to an illness. He is averaging 13.5 points.

However, the Jazz improved to 17-5 without Conley, a testament to their depth.

Miami led 28-25 after the first quarter, closing the period on a 10-2 run. The Heat stretched their advantage to 52-47 at halftime.

Utah, thanks to eight points from Mitchell and seven from Bogdanovic, surged on top in the third, taking a 79-74 lead by the end of the quarter.

The Jazz took their largest lead of the game up to that point on a Clarkson 3-pointer that put them up 96-85 with 8:10 left in the fourth. Utah cruised from there.

The Jazz shot 48.2 percent from the floor, including 14-of-36 on three-pointers (38.9%).

Miami shot 43.2 percent from the floor, including 13-of-39 on 3-pointers (33.3%).

JAMES’ TRIPLE-DOUBLE HELPS LAKERS EDGE NUGGETS IN OT
LeBron James had 32 points, 14 assists and 12 rebounds, Anthony Davis finished with 33 points and 10 rebounds, and the visiting Los Angeles Lakers beat the Denver Nuggets 120-116 in overtime on Wednesday night.

It was the 12th triple-double of the season for James, tying him with the Dallas Mavericks’ Luka Doncic for the NBA lead.

Dwight Howard had 14 points and 11 rebounds, and Alex Caruso and Avery Bradley scored 10 points each for the Lakers, who have won 17 straight road games against Western Conference opponents. Los Angeles is 5-1 in its past six games overall.

Jamal Murray had 32 points and 10 assists, Nikola Jokic scored 22 and added 11 rebounds, and Jerami Grant had 15 points for Denver. The Nuggets had their four-game win streak snapped.

Gary Harris scored 13 points and Monte Morris added 12 for Denver, which lost both home games to Los Angeles this season.

Davis scored seven points in overtime, including a 3-pointer to put the Lakers ahead 119-116 with 2:41 left. The Nuggets missed their last five shots and had a turnover in the final three minutes of the extra period.

Los Angeles led 97-94 after a James dunk, but Grant hit a short jumper, Harris had a pair of free throws and Murray drained a 3-pointer and Harris sank a shot during a 9-0 run put the Nuggets up 103-97 with 4:16 left in regulation.

The Lakers scored six straight to tie it and took a 109-105 lead when James fed Caruso for a layup with 1:43 left.

Jokic hit two free throws and passed to Grant for a layup to get Denver within 111-109, and Harris hit a layup with 23.9 seconds left to tie it again. James missed a jumper in the final seconds to send the game to overtime.

The Lakers ended the first half on a 25-6 run to take a 61-55 lead at the intermission. Los Angeles then scored the first five points of the second half for its biggest lead of the night.

Denver came right back with 11 straight points, tying it on a 3-pointer by Jokic. Later in the period, the Nuggets scored seven straight to go up 85-80, and the hosts took an 87-84 lead into the fourth.

GORDON HELPS MAGIC GET PAST PISTONS IN OT
Aaron Gordon had 25 points, nine rebounds and nine assists, and Nikola Vucevic hit the go-ahead shot in overtime as the Orlando Magic held off the visiting Detroit Pistons 116-112 on Wednesday.

Markelle Fultz supplied 22 points and 10 assists, while Vucevic contributed 19 points, 11 rebounds and seven assists. Evan Fournier added 19 points for the Magic.

Christian Wood led the Pistons with 26 points and 12 rebounds. Thon Maker had 18 points, Markieff Morris scored 14, Reggie Jackson added 12 and Langston Galloway chipped in 11 for the Pistons, who have lost four straight. — Reuters

Kaya FC keeps winning start of PHL clubs at AFC Cup 2020

By Michael Angelo S. Murillo
Senior Reporter

KAYA FC-Iloilo kept the winning start of Philippine clubs seeing action at the AFC Cup 2020 with a hard-earned 2-0 victory over Shan United FC in an away Group H match on Wednesday in Myanmar.

Stayed the course despite its early struggles in the contest held at the Thuwunna Stadium, Kaya held on to book win number one in the tournament.

The win was in follow-up to that of fellow Philippine club Ceres-Negros FC, which also opened its AFC Cup campaign in Group G of the tournament with a win here at home on Tuesday.

It was a grind-it-out game for much of the time between Kaya and Shan United until veteran Jovin Bedic broke the nil-nil count at the 74th minute.

The teams slugged it out after but the Kaya would create further separation, 2-0, care of second-half substitute Eric Giganto in the 85th minute.

Shan United tried to rally back but Kaya held steady and went for the closeout the rest of the way.

“The first half we struggled a little bit, but we turned things around in the second half,” said Kaya head coach Oliver Colina.

“We got what we came for. It doesn’t matter if it’s two-nil, one-nil, or whatever. We got the three points, and that was our objective coming here,” he added.

Heading into this year’s AFC Cup, Kaya went on a recalibration of its roster, bringing in new players and coaches, including Mr. Colina.

“We’re a strong team also. We just played our game, got our chance and we took it,” said Mr. Colina of the mindset they had throughout the match.

For man of the match Giganto, he said hopefully the win inspires the whole team to continue improving as the tournament progresses.

“The feeling is great, especially to score here in Myanmar. They’re a good team. We saw them play before in the Philippines. Credit to my teammates, they worked so hard over the 90 minutes. Me, I was just in the right place at the right time and I scored,” said Mr. Giganto after the game.

Next for Kaya, in its third appearance at the AFC Cup, is a home match at the Rizal Memorial Stadium against Tampines Rovers of Singapore on Feb. 26.

Tampines was a 2-1 winner also on Wednesday over Indonesia’s PSM Makassar in their Group H match in Kailang.