Home Blog Page 5657

Long season for Nets

If there’s anything that the Nets’ current situation shows, it’s that timing can make or break any potential deal. Back in June, they were all too ready to deal mercurial star Kyrie Irving, but at the right price — with the operative word “right” evidently not carrying a common meaning to them and to prospective partners. For instance, they appeared willing to get a deal done with the Lakers had the latter been willing to part with two first-round draft choices along with former Most Valuable Player awardee Russell Westbrook. Because the purple and gold balked at the second pick, however, any possible arrangement was scuttled. Now, it seems they’re bent on keeping him, and to the point of telling it to all and sundry.

No doubt, the Nets’ decision to keep things the way they are stems from their inability to move all-world Kevin Durant at their desired price. Regardless of the source of the news, they’re asking for the moon, the stars, and the sun in exchange for their franchise player — never mind that he’s an old 34 who already went under the knife due to an Achilles’ tendon injury. True, he has retained the capacity to put up big numbers. On the other hand, the question isn’t his skill set; it’s whether he will be able to take to the court with the consistency would-be employers require of him.

And therein lies the rub. Because Durant’s projected exit has hit a snag, Irving’s own takes a back seat. At this point, it’s clear that the Nets would rather keep them both rather than accept pennies to the dollar for them. That said, they’re taking an enormous risk in so doing. It’s bad enough that they’re latching on to two erstwhile vital cogs who want nothing more than to leave them. The message it sends is that they’re desperate. After all, there is also the danger of settling for the status quo — of accepting less-than-stellar effort from their supposed stalwarts.

Indeed, it’s hard to blame the Nets for trying to make the most out of a mess that was not of their own doing. Then again, they need to be cognizant of diminishing returns; with both Durant and Irving wanting out, the market is effectively depressed. Also, who would want disgruntled leaders? In other words, they’re in for a long season no matter what  they do; the only difference is how much faster they’ll be able to move on.

 

Anthony L. Cuaycong has been writing Courtside since BusinessWorld introduced a Sports section in 1994. He is a consultant on strategic planning, operations and Human Resources management, corporate communications, and business development.

Recession almost certain in Europe

A SHOPPER carries shopping bags as she walks on a street in Paris, France, June 10, 2022. — REUTERS/SARAH MEYSSONNIER/FILE PHOTO

FRANKFURT — It was meant to be Europe’s stellar year.

A post-pandemic spending euphoria, supported by copious government spending was set to drive the economy and help fatigued households regain a sense of normality after two dreadful years.

But all that changed on Feb. 24 with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Normality is gone and crisis has become permanent.

A recession is now almost certain, inflation is nearing double digits and a winter with looming energy shortages is fast approaching.

Though bleak, this outlook is still likely to get worse before any significant improvement well into 2023.

“Crisis is the new normal,” says the Alexandre Bompard, the Chief Executive of retailer Carrefour. “What we have been used to in the last decades — low inflation, international trade — it’s over,” he told investors.

The change is dramatic. A year ago, most forecasters predicted 2022 economic growth to be near 5%. Now a winter recession is becoming the base case.

Households and businesses are both suffering as the fallout of the war — high food and energy prices — is now exacerbated by a devastating drought and low river levels that constrain transport.

At 9%, inflation in the euro area is at levels not seen in a half a century and it is sapping purchasing power with spare cash used up on petrol, natural gas and staple food.

Retail sales are already plunging, months before the heating season starts and shoppers are scaling down their purchases. In June, retail sales volumes were down nearly 4% from a year earlier, led by a 9% drop recorded in Germany.

Consumers turn to discount chains and give up high end products, switching to discount brands. They have also started to skip certain purchases.

“Life is becoming more expensive and consumers are reluctant to consume,” Robert Gentz, the co-CEO of German retailer Zalando, told reporters.

Businesses have so far coped well thanks to superb pricing power due to persistent supply constraints. But energy intensive sectors are already suffering.

Close to half of Europe’s aluminum and zinc smelting capacity is already offline while much of fertilizer production, which relies on natural gas, has been shut.

Tourism has been the rare bright spot with people looking to spend some of accumulated savings and enjoy their first care-free summer since 2019.

But even the travel sector is hamstrung by capacity and labour shortages as workers laid off during the pandemic were reluctant to return.

Key airports, such as Frankfurt and London Heathrow were forced to cap flights simply because they lacked the staff to process passengers. At Amsterdam’s Schiphol, waiting times could stretch to four or five hours this summer.

Airlines also could not cope. Germany’s Lufthansa LHAG.DE had to publish an apology to customers for the chaos, admitting that it was unlikely to ease anytime soon.

RECESSION LOOMS
That pain is likely to intensify, especially if Russia cuts gas exports further.

“The gas shock today is much greater; it is almost double the shock that we had back in the 70s with oil,” Caroline Bain at Capital Economics said. “We’ve seen a 10 to 11 fold increase in the spot price of natural gas in Europe over the last two years.”

While the EU has unveiled plans to accelerate its transition to renewable energy and wean the bloc off Russian gas by 2027, making it more resilient in the long run, supply shortages are forcing it seek a 15% cut in gas consumption this year.

But energy independence comes at a cost.

For ordinary people it will mean colder homes and offices in the short run. Germany for instance wants public spaces heated only to 19 degrees Celsius this winter compared with around 22 degrees previously.

Further out, it will mean higher energy costs and thus inflation as the bloc must give up its biggest and cheapest energy supplies.

For businesses, it will mean lower production, which eats further into growth, particularly in industry.

Wholesale gas prices in Germany, the bloc’s biggest economy, are up five-fold in a year but consumers are protected by long term contracts, so the impact so far has been far smaller.

Still, they will have to pay a government mandated levy and once contracts roll over, prices will soar, suggesting the impact will just come with a delay, putting persistent upward pressure on inflation.

That is why many if not most economists see Germany and Italy, Europe’s no. 1 and no. 4 economies with heavy reliance on gas, entering a recession soon.

While a recession in the United States is also likely, its origin will be quite different.

SILVER LINING
Struggling with a red-hot labor market and rapid wage growth, the US Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates quickly and has made clear it is willing to risk even a recession to tame price growth.

By contrast, the European Central Bank (ECB) has only increased rates once, back to zero, and will move only cautiously, mindful that raising the borrowing cost of highly indebted euro zone nations, such as Italy, Spain and Greece could fuel worries about their ability to keep paying their debts.

But Europe will go into a recession with some strengths.

Employment is record high and firms have struggled with growing labor scarcity for years.

This suggests that companies will be keen to hang onto workers, especially since they head for the downturn with relatively healthy margins.

This could then sustain purchasing power, pointing to a relatively shallow recession with only a modest uptick in what is now a record low jobless rate.

“We see continued acute shortages of labor, historically low unemployment and a high number of vacancies,” ECB board member Isabel Schnabel told Reuters earlier. “This probably implies that even if we enter a downturn, firms may be quite reluctant to shed workers on a broad scale.” — Reuters

Russia accuses Ukraine of killing nationalist’s daughter

Russian President Vladimir Putin

RUSSIA’s Federal Security Service accused Ukraine’s secret services on Monday of killing Darya Dugina, the daughter of an ultra-nationalist, in a car bomb attack near Moscow that President Vladimir Putin called “evil”.

Ms. Dugina, whose father Alexander Dugin is a prominent ideologue, was killed on Saturday when a bomb blew up the Toyota Land Cruiser she was driving, Russian investigators said.

Ukraine, defending itself from what it says is an imperial-style war of conquest waged by Russia, denied involvement in the attack, with Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak calling the accusation “propaganda”.

Mr. Putin on Monday posthumously granted Ms. Dugina the Order of Courage, a prestigious state award, “for courage and selflessness shown in the performance of professional duty,” the Kremlin said.

Ms. Dugina, a regular commentator on state TV, strongly backed Russia’s actions in Ukraine, which Moscow calls a “special military operation”.

Alexander Dugin, 60, has long advocated violence to achieve the unification of Russian-speaking and other territories.

In his first public statement on the bombing, he said Darya had been savagely killed before his own eyes by Ukraine.

“Our hearts are not simply thirsting for revenge or retribution,” Mr. Dugin wrote. “We only need our victory (against Ukraine). My daughter has sacrificed her young life on the altar of victory. So please win!”

Russia’s FSB security service said the attack was carried out by a Ukrainian woman born in 1979, whom it named and whose picture and information appeared on Russian news websites.

They linked her to Ukraine’s security services and accused her of being a member of the Azov battalion, a unit of Ukraine’s army that Russia has designated a terrorist group.

In response, Azov said the woman had never been a member of the unit and accused Russia of concocting a lie.

The FSB said the woman had arrived in Russia in July and spent a month preparing the attack. She had fled to Estonia afterwards, it said.

Russian law enforcement agencies had placed the woman on the country’s wanted list, TASS news agency reported, with Moscow seeking her extradition.

Estonia’s interior ministry and police and border guard service said in separate statements they could share information on individuals entering and leaving Estonia “only in cases prescribed by law,” adding the FSB allegation did not meet that requirement.

Mr. Putin paid tribute to Ms. Dugina as a patriot, calling her murder “evil and cruel,” while Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of the Kremlin-backed RT media organization, suggested agents could track the woman down.

“Estonia, of course will not hand them over,” Ms. Simonyan wrote on Telegram.

A memorial service for Dugina will be held on Tuesday at Moscow’s TV center, her father said.

On Monday, residents of Moscow laid flowers and lit candles at a makeshift memorial.

“She was a unique person, and this loss is absolutely irreplaceable,” said Sergei Sidorov.

Some Russian opposition figures were skeptical about the speed at which the FSB appeared to have solved the case and suggested alternative versions.

Ilya Ponomaryov, a former lawmaker turned Ukraine-based Kremlin critic, said a previously unknown group of Russian militants called the National Republican Army was responsible.

His assertion and the group’s existence could not be independently verified by Reuters.

Russia’s Investigative Committee did not respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Ponomaryov was the only member of the State Duma, the lower house of parliament, to vote against the annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region in 2014 and later left Russia.

Mr. Ponomaryov, who runs an online TV station designed to challenge the Kremlin’s narrative of the war, read out a manifesto he said the group had sent him.

It said the group was committed to overthrowing Putin and building a new Russia. Such statements are illegal inside Russia and those who make them face long jail terms.

His assertion adds to a list of possible theories about who killed Ms. Dugina.

Some people believe her father was the target. — Reuters

Singaporean bargain hunters jam roads after currency boost

REUTERS

SINGAPORE’s surging currency is contributing to massive traffic jams on the road to Malaysia.

Keen to take advantage of a record high exchange rate, Singaporean bargain hunters are streaming into the neighboring nation to snap up goods and take advantage of more reasonably priced entertainment and services like health care.

The result is snarl-ups of up to four hours at border checkpoints between the city-state and Malaysia’s southern state of Johor. In normal circumstances, the journey takes only 20 minutes.

It’s gotten so bad that Singapore’s Immigration & Checkpoints Authority issues regular congestion updates on the radio and advised people to cancel travel plans during recent holidays. Frustrated travelers have taken to social media, recording road rage incidents — including a woman pulling off another car’s license plate — while others are making Tiktok videos about the wait at immigration.

Still, Susan Lim, a 68-year-old homemaker, was more than willing to put up with these inconveniences when she needed wisdom tooth surgery. She chose a dentist in Johor and paid 700 Malaysian ringgit ($157) rather than the more than S$400 ($290) it would have cost in Singapore.

“I treat it as a short getaway from the city-state, with great food and services like a haircut at a much affordable price,” she said.

Singapore is a 280 square mile (725 square kilometers) island trading hub located off the southern tip of Malaysia. Many residents in the heavily-urbanized city-state make frequent trips across the border to Johor, where attractions include laid-back cafes and reasonably-priced restaurants, Desaru’s beaches, village resorts and theme parks like Legoland.

Singaporeans are well versed at hopping over to Malaysia to take advantage of cheaper goods and services — in 2015 demand was so great that money changers at times ran out of ringgit. Fueling the current craze for all things Malaysian, is the strength of the Singapore dollar, which has risen more than 5% against the Malaysian ringgit this year, closing at a record 3.2473 ringgit on Aug. 11. The previous record was 3.1681 in March 2017.

The Singapore dollar is benefitting from the differing monetary policies the two nations are using to counter inflation. Singapore’s central bank, which uses foreign exchange as its main policy tool, has focused on efforts to strengthen its currency. In comparison, its palm-oil rich neighbor has kept its policy accommodative.

Malaysia is not alone in seeing its weak currency act as a draw for tourists — Buenos Aires in Argentina last year designed a campaign to lure visitors with its favorable exchange rates, while American travelers have this summer taken advantage of the dollar’s strength making trips abroad more affordable.

TRAFFIC JAM
Singapore’s strong exchange rate has coincided with a post-COVID travel boom — spending on foreign travel from residents in the city-state rose 240% in the second quarter year on year — and grinding infrastructure problems. The combination has caused one big traffic jam.

The Singapore-Malaysia border checkpoints are among the busiest land crossings in the world, with about 200,000 travelers departing daily before the pandemic. Since borders reopened in April, the traffic flow has been gradually increasing, with the number of travelers peaking at 290,000 per day over the last weekend in July.

The volume of people has put pressure on the two nations to alleviate the problems on the road. Currently, there is just one train service connecting Malaysia’s Johor Bahru Sentral station and Woodlands station in Singapore.

A high-speed rail project — the Johor Bahru-Singapore Rapid Transit System — is under construction and should absorb 35% of the congestion. But the train line, which was temporarily suspended in 2019 due to cost concerns, won’t be completed until 2026 at the earliest — two years later than planned.

Aggravating the traffic problems is lengthy upgrade work being carried out on arrival immigration car booths at the Malaysia border.

TIGHT CONTROL
The gridlock and chaos at the border are in stark contrast to the steely control Singapore’s government exerts over traffic in the city. In an attempt to stem congestion and pollution, the government restricts the number of cars with a limited quota of permits, making its autos among the most expensive in the world. Pent-up consumer demand and a growing appetite for electric vehicles pushed the price of permits for large cars to a record high in August.

This means, despite packing 5 million people onto an island half the size of London, Singapore ranked 96 out of 416 cities globally in the TomTom traffic congestion index in 2019. Last year, it was 88th out of 404.

The big winners from the increased traffic from Singapore are shops and businesses in Malaysia. The Johor Premium Outlet, one of the Malaysia’s most popular shopping destination due to its proximity to Singapore, has seen a steady flow of Singaporean visitors. And it’s not just shops — cross-border taxi services, bridal pre-wedding photo shoots, car washes, hotels, medical services and beauty and massage parlors are experiencing a boom.

“The number of Singaporeans seeking services has reached pre-Covid levels with a spike in the recent weeks,” a spokesperson from Regency Specialist Hospital said. — Bloomberg

Fauci, face of US COVID response, to step down from government posts

REUTERS

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI, the top US infectious disease official who became the face of America’s COVID-19 pandemic response under Presidents Donald Trump and Joseph R. Biden, announced on Monday he is stepping down in December after 54 years of public service.

Mr. Fauci, whose efforts to fight the pandemic were applauded by many public health experts even as he was vilified by Mr. Trump and many Republicans, will leave his posts as chief medical adviser to Mr. Biden and director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Fauci, 81, has headed NIAID since 1984.

The veteran immunologist has served as an adviser to seven US presidents beginning with Republican Ronald Reagan, focusing on newly emerging and re-emerging infectious disease dangers including HIV/AIDS, Ebola, Zika, monkeypox and COVID-19.

Mr. Fauci endured criticism from Mr. Trump and various conservatives and even death threats against him and his family from people who objected to safeguards such as vaccination, social distancing and masking that he advocated to try to limit the lethality of the COVID-19 pandemic. After defeating Mr. Trump in the 2020 election, Mr. Biden made Mr. Fauci his chief medical adviser.

“I definitely feel it was worth staying as long as I have. It is unfortunate, but it is a fact of life that we are living in a very, very divisive society right now,” Mr. Fauci told Reuters on Monday.

Mr. Fauci said he never considered resigning due to the threats against him.

“I don’t like the idea that I have to have armed federal agents with me. That’s not a happy feeling. It’s reality. And you’ve got to deal with reality,” Mr. Fauci said.

Republican lawmakers including fierce critic Rand Paul, with whom Mr. Fauci tangled during Senate hearings, vowed on Monday to investigate him if they gain control of either the House of Representatives or Senate in November’s congressional elections.

“As he leaves his position in the US Government, I know the American people and the entire world will continue to benefit from Dr. Fauci’s expertise in whatever he does next,” Mr. Biden said in a statement. “The United States of America is stronger, more resilient and healthier because of him.”

Mr. Fauci signaled his impending departure last month, telling Reuters he would retire by the end of Mr. Biden’s first term, which runs to January 2025, and possibly earlier.

The United States leads the world in recorded COVID-19 deaths with more than one million. In the first months of the pandemic in 2020, Mr. Fauci helped lead scientific efforts to develop and test COVID-19 vaccines in record time and took part in regular televised White House briefings alongside Mr. Trump.

Mr. Fauci became a popular and trusted figure among many Americans as the United States faced lockdowns and rising numbers of COVID-19 deaths, even inspiring the sale of cookies and bobblehead dolls featuring his likeness.

However, Mr. Fauci drew the ire of Mr. Trump and many Republicans for cautioning against reopening the US economy too quickly and risking increased infections and for opposing the use of unproven treatments such as the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine.

‘A DISASTER’
Democrats accused Mr. Trump of presiding over a disjointed response to the pandemic and of disregarding advice from public health experts including Mr. Fauci. Mr. Trump in October 2020, weeks before his re-election loss, called Mr. Fauci “a disaster” and complained that Americans were tired of hearing about the pandemic. Mr. Trump even made fun of Mr. Fauci’s off-target ceremonial first pitch at a Washington Nationals baseball game.

Mr. Fauci sometimes publicly contradicted Mr. Trump’s statements about the pandemic. Mr. Fauci said on Monday that while he respects the office of the presidency, he felt he had to speak out “when things were said that were outright untrue and quite misleading.” “I didn’t take any great pleasure in that,” Mr. Fauci said.

Mr. Paul frequently attacked Mr. Fauci during Senate hearings on the pandemic.

Mr. Fauci has accused Mr. Paul of spreading misinformation. Mr. Paul on his website has accused Mr. Fauci of “lying about everything from masks to the contagiousness of the virus.” Mr. Fauci during one hearing noted that Mr. Paul placed fundraising appeals on his website next to a call to have him fired.

Fauci said staying on until December allows for a search for a new director of NIAID, an institute with an annual budget exceeding $6 billion, and the appointment of an acting chief. Fauci also said he wanted to remain to help address an expected autumn upswing in COVID-19 infections.

Fauci made clear that while he will be leaving government service, he will not be retiring. He said in the future he hopes to use his expertise to help inspire a new generation of doctors to pursue careers in public health, medicine and science. — Reuters

China says COVID has exacerbated decline in births, marriages

REUTERS

HONG KONG — China’s National Health Commission said COVID-19 has contributed to the decline in the country’s marriage and birth rates that has accelerated in recent years due to the high costs of education and child-rearing.

Many women are continuing to delay their plans to marry or have children, it said, adding that rapid economic and social developments have led to “profound changes”.

Young people relocating to urban areas, more time spent on education and high-pressure working environments have also played their part, it added.

Demographers have also said that China’s uncompromising “zero-COVID” policy of promptly stamping out any outbreaks with strict controls on people’s lives may have caused profound, lasting damage on their desire to have children.

“The coronavirus has also had a clear impact on the marriage and childbirth arrangements of some people,” the commission said.

The comments were sent to Reuters via fax late on Monday in response to questions on the topic.

New births in China are set to fall to record lows this year, demographers say, with forecasts calling for a drop below 10 million compared to last year’s 10.6 million babies — a level 11.5% lower than in 2020.

China had a fertility rate of 1.16 in 2021, one of the lowest rates in the world and below the 2.1 rate the OECD sees as necessary for a stable population. Having imposed a one-child policy from 1980 to 2015, China has acknowledged its population is on brink of shrinking — a potential crisis that will test its ability to pay and care for its elderly.

To counter the problem, authorities at national and provincial levels have over the past year introduced measures such as tax breaks, longer maternity leave, enhanced medical insurance, housing subsidies and extra money for a third child. — Reuters

Addressing the challenge of agricultural development

BRUCE WARRINGTON-UNSPLASH

(Part 1)

As if to dare President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. to exert even greater effort in meeting his greatest challenge, which is that of improving the productivity of the agricultural sector, agricultural output contracted further during the quarter in which he was sworn in as President and in which he designated himself as the Secretary of Agriculture.

Data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) showed that the value of production in agriculture and fisheries at constant 2018 prices declined 0.6% in the April to June 2022 period, worsening from the 0.3% contraction in the first quarter. The President knows that increasing agricultural productivity is not going to be a walk in the park. That is why one of the very first advisory groups from the private sector that he convoked was in food security, composed of some of the most experienced entrepreneurs in the field of agribusiness gathered by his private sector adviser, Sabine Aboitiz.

The President is fortunate that the outgoing Secretary of Agriculture, William Dar, led a group of experts from his own Department and from outside experts (some of them former Secretaries of Agriculture) to come out with a Transition Report filled with recommendations and specific policy targets and solutions towards long-term visions of food security and food sovereignty, while at the same time emphasizing urgent action points, especially in the context of a looming food crisis worldwide brought about by the Russia-Ukraine war. This document should be closely studied, not only by the members of the Cabinet of the present Administration but also by all those in government, business, and civil society who want to make their contribution to solving the problem of agricultural underdevelopment. To do something about the low productivity of farmers and fisherfolks is to directly address the problem of mass poverty since three-fourths of those who fall below the poverty line in the Philippines (now estimated at 18.1% of the total population of about 112 million) are in the rural areas.

As every effort to address an economic problem should, the Report starts with a situational analysis. Over the period 2001 to 2021 (one generation), the average growth of the Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (AFF) sector was a measly 2.5%, compared to the Industry and Service sectors’ average growth rates of 4.5% and 5.5%, respectively. AFF’s contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) at constant 2018 prices declined by 37.5%, or from 15.4% in 2001 to 9.5% in 2021—with an average share of 12.8% from 2001 to 2021. It follows then that of the three major sectors of the economy, AFF’s contribution to the country’s economic growth was the smallest. Out of the 4.8% average GDP annual growth within the generation studied, the AFF sector contributed only 0.3%. For the same period, the share of the Industry and Service sectors to GDP growth were 1.4 and 3.1 percentage points, respectively.

Reflecting the very low labor productivity in the agricultural sector is the fact that, while it contributes only 10% of GDP, its contribution to the labor force is 24% of the total. It used to be much higher at 37% in 2000. Labor in agriculture grew from 2000 to 2011 by 20.5%, which was equivalent to around 2 million workers. The number of agricultural workers, however, continuously decreased since 2011, during which approximately 2.3 million agricultural workers migrated to the other two sectors from 2011 to 2018. This translates to around 284,000 workers per year leaving the sector during that period, which coincided with the Philippine economy shedding its notoriety as the sick man of Asia. This period saw Philippine GDP growing at an average of 6% to 7%, one of the most rapid in East Asia. The contraction in agriculture’s employment share significantly accelerated starting 2011. From 2011 to 2018, the employment share of agriculture shrank by 10 percentage points in 2011, or from 33% in 2011 to 24% in 2018. This trend, if continued during the present Administration of President Marcos Jr., may actually favor the increased mechanization of farming, leading to an improvement of agricultural productivity. For this to happen, efforts in agrarian reform should shift from further fragmentation of land to consolidation of small farms into larger units through farmers’ cooperatives or the nucleus estate system perfected by the Malaysians in palm oil and rubber plantations.

Considering the slow growth of the AFF sector and its modest share in GDP, coupled with its relatively high contribution to total employment, its development significantly lagged behind the other sectors as measured by labor productivity. AFF’s output per work was consistently the lowest among the major sectors from 2000 to 2018, the real golden age of the Philippine economy shared by the two Presidents, i.e., Benigno Aquino III and Rodrigo Duterte. The highest productivity was seen in the manufacturing sector in which the industry’s output share was approximately 30%, despite accounting only for 16% of the total employment.

Two obvious means of increasing labor productivity in agriculture are the introduction of more capital investments and the upskilling and retooling of farmers, especially among the younger ones. The average age of a Filipino farmer is already close to 60 years. There must be a way of attracting the young, whether or not children of farmers themselves, to the vocation of a farmer and eventually the whole sector of agribusiness, which comprises not only farming but the whole value chain, from post-harvest, to storage and warehousing, processing, wholesale and retail.

It was not only in labor productivity that the Philippine AFF sector fared very poorly in comparison to its Southeast Asian peers. The sector was weak in terms of productivity, per capita volume, and high costs (low returns) compared to neighboring countries in the ASEAN. The Philippine total factor productivity growth in AFF, which is a measure of productive efficiency, was the lowest in 2010 to 2014. Subsequently, average farm yield in the Philippines was 9% and 67% lower than in Malaysia and Vietnam in 2014, respectively. This low productivity of the Philippine AFF sector in great contrast with Vietnam is one major explanation why Vietnam surpassed us in per capita income in 2020. What Vietnam has accomplished in reaching high levels of productivity in rice, coffee, and aquaculture should be emulated by the Administration of President Marcos Jr.

Philippine manufacturing, both for the domestic and foreign markets, can be given a big boost if we can improve the forward linkages of the AFF sector. Unfortunately, these linkages are weak in comparison also to our ASEAN neighbors, especially Thailand that is considered the agribusiness behemoth of Southeast Asia. The forward linkages of the Philippine AFF sector to manufacturing grew marginally by only 10% from 1994 to 2012. In contrast, the contribution of food and beverage (the likes of San Miguel Corp., Robina, Century Canning, Monde Nissin, etc.), which largely depend on agricultural or aquacultural products for inputs, to total gross value added (GVA) of manufacturing grew very rapidly during the 2000 to 2021 period. The share of food and beverage manufacturing to total GVA of the manufacturing sector (one of the major components of industry) rose from 36% in 2001 to a whopping 55% in 2021.

Given the meager forward linkage of the AFF sector, this implies that the food and beverage manufacturing subsector relies heavily on imports for its inputs. It stood to reason that agri-food exports of the Philippines were, on average, around three times and six times less than Vietnam and Thailand, respectively from 2001 to 2020. Philippine agricultural trade deficits were likewise widening. International trade economist Ramon Clarete estimated that the Philippines incurred large potential export income losses of approximately $230 million in 2018 alone.

Needless to say, the low productivity and the diminishing competitive advantage of the Philippine AFF sector have two primary negative impacts on sustainable and inclusive growth: low wages resulting in high poverty incidence among agricultural workers, and soaring domestic prices, which were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. Given the relatively low productivity of labor in agriculture, wages in the sector are expected to be lower than those in industry and services. True enough, the average daily basic pay in agriculture, at constant 2006 prices, was approximately 55% and 46% lower than in services and manufacturing, respectively, in 2016.

The most tragic consequence of the low productivity of the AFF sector is mass poverty in the rural areas, where three-fourths of Filipinos falling below the poverty line are. Agricultural households had poverty incidence approximately four times higher than non-agricultural households from 2003 to 2015. On the other hand, although visibly underemployed workers accounted only for 12% of total workers, the rate of poverty among visibly underemployed in workers in general was at 34.2% while poverty incidence of visibly underemployed agricultural workers was at 44% in 2015.

Finally, the backwardness of the AFF sector resulted in high domestic food prices, contributing to malnutrition and ultimately to lesser and/or slower human development of poor households.

The average share of food and non-alcoholic beverage to headline inflation was significant at 43% from 2000 to 2021, with 57% being accounted for by the other 10 major commodity groups. Given that the poorest of the poor households spend approximately 60% of their total income on food items, rising food prices inevitably lead to higher incidence of malnutrition. This was exacerbated during the pandemic. Malnutrition is significantly higher in the Philippines compared with its ASEAN peers. In 2018, malnutrition in the Philippines, especially among children, is nine times, 20 times, and a whopping 287 times compared with that of Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam, respectively. This state of affairs in the area of food security has very tragic consequences on the quality of our human resources.

(To be continued.)

 

Bernardo M. Villegas has a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard, is professor emeritus at the University of Asia and the Pacific, and a visiting professor at the IESE Business School in Barcelona, Spain. He was a member of the 1986 Constitutional Commission.

bernardo.villegas@uap.asia

Continuing responsive health services for rare disease patients

OLGA KONONENKO-UNSPLASH

Rare diseases are a group of disorders which individually affect a few patients. These diseases are often considered chronic, progressive, degenerative, and life-threatening. Often, they are termed as “orphan diseases” due to the neglect from the medical community.

Patients living with rare diseases (PLWRDs) are unceasingly confronted with several challenges, the most predominant of which is the requirement of lifetime medical management.

Imagine experiencing a similar condition. Perhaps one cannot fathom the quality of life of these patients. Consider the lives of their families, beset with significant social and economic burdens as they struggle to make ends meet for their loved ones.

The start of this year provided some relief and hope for PLWRDs, their carers and families when funding worth P104.9 million was included in the General Appropriation Act of 2022, specifically for the implementation of the Rare Disease Law or Republic Act 10747.

Passed in 2016, the said Law aims to improve access of PLWRD or patients suspected of having a rare disease, to comprehensive medical care. This includes access to available medicines and other health technologies that will treat or otherwise help them cope with their condition.

On Aug. 15,  the Stratbase ADR Institute, in partnership with the Philippine Society for Orphan Disorders (PSOD) and UHCWatch, held a hybrid town hall discussion (THD) entitled “The State of Rare Disease Law: Continuing Implementation and the Delivery of Responsive Health Services to the Affected Population.”

The THD, which is actually a continuation of an initial discussion held last January, brought together different stakeholders from the academe, government agencies, civil society/patient organizations, and private sectors. It showcased milestones and updates, continuing challenges and a possible way forward that will support the progressive implementation of the Law.

Prof. Dindo Manhit, President of Stratbase ADR Institute, mentioned in his opening remarks: “continuous support and advocacy is needed to sustain a responsive healthcare system and that adequate resources is vital to constantly respond with the public needs, including those patients living with rare diseases.”

Dr. Carmencita Padilla, Chancellor of the University of the Philippines-Manila and Founding Chairman of PSOD, said that “it’s not a societal commitment. It is a commitment of the world to make sure that it is inclusive, that all patients will be able to benefit from the policy.”

According to Dr. Razel Nikka Hao, Director IV of the Disease Prevention and Control Bureau of the Department of Health, “a recently approved five-year strategic plan for the integrated management of [rare disease] condition… is rooted in the five guiding principles of access, integrated comprehensive care, evidence-based policies, inclusive communication and enhanced collaboration.”

“A total 159 rare diseases made it into the initial list that was submitted to the Department of Health,” noted Dr. Eva Maria C. Cutiongco-dela Paz, Executive Director of the UP-National Institutes of Health. “Additionally, a checklist provided assistance in deciding which rare diseases are the most important to be included in the list that will be covered by the Law.”

Dr. Durhane Wong-Reiger of the Asia Pacific Alliance of Rare Disease Organizations, who joined the discussion virtually from Canada, said that “there is a need to address the health of the most vulnerable for an inclusive society.” PLWRD are counted as among the most vulnerable and marginalized populations.

“Only 5% of rare diseases have an approved orphan drug,” Daisy Cembrano of the Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association of the Philippines pointed out. She reiterated the pharma industry’s commitment to advocate for policy reforms based on four principles, namely, 1.) rare diseases as a public health priority, 2.) empowering patients and their communities, 3.) promoting continued research and development, and, 4.) ensuring sustainable patient access to diagnosis and care.

Senator Sonny Angara, in his message, asserted that “funding is a challenge, but hopefully the Legislature can provide more, as well as the National Expenditure Program provided by the Executive.” He expressed gratitude to the private sector for their help and encouraged people to partner with the government in helping make progress against rare diseases.

The senator also assured the public of continued support and motivated them to continue the dialogue to keep the attention on rare diseases.

Among those who also shared their insights in the event were Chris Muñoz of the Philippine Alliance of Patient Organizations, Cynthia Magdaraog of the PSOD, and Dr. Lizette Kristine Lopez of the Health Technology Assessment Council.

As the one who was tasked to moderate the said event, I would like to send my sincere appreciation to the PLWRDs who personally attended the event. Indeed, you are an inspiration to all patients. I hope that someday we will no longer use the term “orphan disorders” to describe your diseases, as all will have corresponding treatment.

 

Alvin Manalansan is the health and nutrition fellow at Stratbase ADR Institute and a co-convenor of UHC Watch.

CREATE-ing Business Opportunities?

ADAM NIR-UNSPLASH

A closer look at the 2022 SIPP and the incentives concerns of foreign investors

The Angara Abello Concepcion Regala Cruz Law Offices or ACCRALAW recently concluded a seminar on the latest laws geared to promote foreign investments. It was part of a year-long celebration of ACCRALAW’s golden anniversary and a way of giving back to its valued clients. The presenters provided insights on what prompted the government to pass these legislations, considering the challenges of foreign clients and their costs for doing business in the country.

As one of the speakers, I naturally highlighted the government’s industrial strategy reflected in the 2022 Strategic Investment Priority Plan (SIPP). This is an important component of the country’s incentives system, which CREATE (RA 11534 or the Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises Act) overhauled early last year. The extent of incentives depends on the SIPP, which differentiates export and domestic market activities. The special corporate income tax and zero-rated purchase incentives are only granted to registered export entities.

The 2022 SIPP identifies the government target activities for the next three years. They are classified into tiers, and not into mere pioneer and non-pioneer categories.

The 2020 and 2021 priority activities are generally carried over as Tier 1 activities. They focus on job and value creation, and support for strategic or emerging industries. Export- and BPO- related activities, major infrastructure, and telecommunications projects (specifically the establishment of connectivity facilities for broadband services) fall under Tier 1 category.

Foreign investors may now fully participate in construction activities (PCAB v. Manila Water Co., Inc., 2021). With the recent Public Service Act (PSA) amendment, they may operate, manage, or control major infrastructure and telecommunications projects. Safeguards are in place when foreign investors own strategic industries. Foreign government investments in public utilities and critical infrastructures are prohibited on a prospective basis.

Tier 2 activities cover environment, health, food security, industrial value-chain, and defense-related activities. Those not specifically listed may fall under Tier 1. They have been government’s priority except for defense-related activities. Electric Vehicle (EV) assembly and related support activities, renewable energy (RE), energy efficiency, conservation, and storage technology-related projects enjoy Tier 2 incentives.

The incentives on EV-related projects align with the PSA’s clarificatory amendment. EVs are not considered as PUVs (public utility vehicles). Foreign investors may now engage in the public transport business, especially using EVs.

The more generous RE law incentives are still in place. CREATE did not remove and instead complemented them. RE developers may enjoy a longer income tax holiday (or net operating loss carry-over privilege, as applicable), reduced corporate income tax, and VAT zero-rating treatment of local sales. They may apply for duty- and VAT-free importation under CREATE and just not for a limited period under the RE law.

Crude oil refining is a Tier 2 activity. Oil storage and distribution may continue to enjoy the Oil Industry Deregulation Act fiscal incentives but as Tier 1 activities.

Government endorsed defense-related activities are now considered priority projects. The Foreign Investments Act amendment removed substantial export requirements, which in the past foreign investors had to meet to undertake such projects.

Tier 3 activities are the truly pioneer activities. They focus on innovation and R&D. Their extensive incentives complement the 2019 innovation legislations, and the recent FIA amendment liberalizing the ownership and capital requirements for startups and startup enablers. The aim is to attract venture capital (VC) investors and establish a Silicon Valley-type hub in the country.

There is concern about the certainty of the rules. Fortunately, the Supreme Court has clarified some issues.

The focus of the incentives is on the registered activity and not on the location of activity (CIR v. JP Morgan, 2018). It follows that the unregistered activities of an entity registered with an Investment Promotions Agency (IPA) may be subject to a default taxation regime even if such activities are carried out inside the IPA administered special zone. The government has yet to clarify the extent of local government units’ (LGUs) authority over unregistered activities inside the special zones. LGUs are required to issue a resolution of concurrence in the creation and special administration by the concerned IPAs of these special zones.

Direct costs should be broadly understood (CIR v. East Asia Utilities, 2020). CREATE’s implementing rules describe them. Judgment is required and East Asia clarification is relevant in their application.

The government may not impose a specific cost allocation methodology (DoF v. AUB, 2021). ACCRALAW successfully litigated this theory for the banks. It has utility when an IPA-registered enterprise adopts a reasonable costs allocation methodology for its numerous (registered and unregistered) activities.

Recent legislation and the 2022 SIPP will create business opportunities. The government must only ensure its implementing issuances enlighten — instead of confuse — investors and other stakeholders.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. This article is for general information and educational purposes, and is not offered as, and does not constitute, legal advice or legal opinion.

 

Eric R. Recalde is a partner and the head of the Tax department of the Angara Abello Concepcion Regal Cruz Law Offices.

errecalde@accralaw.com

02-8830-8000

Europe’s drought could have a long afterlife

REDCHARLIE-UNSPLASH

EUROPE has been burning. As a brutal drought and record-breaking heat gripped the continent this summer, crops withered and forest fires raged. Thunderstorms have been cooling things off but are not expected to end the drought and may even create new problems of their own: flash flooding and falling trees.

The apocalyptic weather is not without precedent, as the reemergence of centuries-old “hunger stones” in the continent’s river beds attest. But as climate change makes such crises more frequent, it’s worth remembering an important point: Historical episodes of meteorological mayhem have sown chaos, fueling everything from social unrest to pandemics.

Consider the drought that hit central Europe in AD 69. The Roman historian Tacitus remains our best source on this disaster. He wrote that the legions sent to deal with the restive German tribes that year were in a “bad temper” because “the Rhine [was] scarcely navigable by reason of a drought unprecedented in that climate.” This explained the soldiers’ other grievances: “want of pay and food.”

Tacitus reported that the superstitious Germans “construed the scarcity of water” as evidence that “the very rivers, those ancient safeguards of the Empire, were deserting us” on account of “the anger of the Rhine God” toward the Romans.

And judging from what went down in Rome in AD 69, the Rhine God was angry indeed. That was the infamous “Year of the Four Emperors,” when ill-fed legions joined a civil war between the different factions vying for supremacy in Rome. The soldiers in Germania threw their lot with a portly contender named Vitellius, who was eventually overthrown after a bloody battle. Vitellius ended up dead, as did tens of thousands of civilians and soldiers alike.

The relationship between bad weather and mutinous soldiers was not restricted to this particular episode. In 2018, an economic historian compared data on weather in ancient Rome with the assassination of Roman emperors. He found a strong statistical correlation between droughts in northern frontier provinces and assassinations of emperors back in Rome. Caveat imperator!

Other studies of climate in ancient Rome have suggested tantalizing, if speculative, links between drought-induced famine and subsequent outbreaks of disease, such as the Plague of Justinian. Bad weather may have sowed the seeds of famine, leaving behind a population vulnerable to the predations of a novel pathogen.

The hypothesis that extreme weather can pave the way for pandemics has also been invoked to explain the severity of the Black Death. In the 1330s, anomalous weather events left Europe devastated and malnourished. Different groups of researchers have argued that the resulting poor harvests left the region’s population especially vulnerable to Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that ravaged the region beginning in 1341.

A little more than a century later, another bout of extreme weather generated entirely different problems. After several years of brutal heat in the early 1470s — what one Belgian chronicler referred to as “an unprecedented and anomalous drought [that] afflicted the whole world” — rivers dried up, crops failed, and many people went, well, crazy. In Spain, political leaders blamed the “conversos” — Jews who had converted to Christianity — for the bad weather and burned them at the stake. It was neither the first nor last time that bad weather begat antisemitism.

What was arguably the worst “megadrought” of the past millennium played out the following century in the summer of 1540. Rivers, springs, and wells dried up. Lake Constance, one of Europe’s deepest and largest lakes, lost so much water that people walked to former islands.

Temperatures must have been excruciating. In France, townspeople huddled in cellars not long after sunrise, hoping to escape the heat. One French chronicler noted that the wine grapes were “roasted and the leaves of the vines had fallen to the ground like after a severe frost.”* Throughout the continent, forest fires erupted, much as they have now. A Swiss account from late July 1540 reported that it was “unbearably hot [with] everybody complaining of water shortages. Forests were burning everywhere around.”

Buildings burst into flames as well. Thanks to the meticulous record-keeping of the Germans, we know that 1540 enjoys the dubious distinction of witnessing more fires in towns than any other peacetime year since 1000 AD. Judging from the anecdotal evidence in other countries, Germany was hardly alone.

The fires lent the sky a ghoulish glow, with many observers reporting that both the sun and moon were wreathed in a blood-red aura. Though many centuries had passed since the time of Tacitus, the Germans and other Europeans greeted these signs with similar superstition, viewing them as portents of evil. Many people soon became convinced that hordes of murderous arsonists — “Mordenbrunner” — were setting the fires.

A search for suspects followed. In some places, Protestants fingered Catholics, suspecting papal intrigue in deadly conflagrations. Elsewhere, local authorities arrested more conventional scapegoats: vagrants and beggars and outsiders — basically, anyone who didn’t belong. In classic late-medieval style, authorities tortured suspects to secure “confessions” of perfidy.

Nonstop fires, blood-red skies, scorching heat, failed harvests and collective paranoia all conspired to make peasants terribly peevish. Mercifully, similarly brutal conditions did not return until 1921.

Climate change has ushered in a new era. Beginning in 2003, Europe has sustained a number of crushing heat waves and droughts, with 2022 arguably the worst on record. The historical record would tell us to watch out: Extreme weather, whatever the cause, leaves chaos in its wake. That’s cold comfort indeed.

BLOOMBERG OPINION

*There were some upsides. When winemakers pressed the desiccated fruit, they ended up with a potent beverage closer to sherry than regular wine. It apparently got people drunk quickly. There was much rejoicing.

Kantar breaks down PHL spending habits, food gets bulk of budget

AllDay Supermarket’s smart carts are easy to use, and allows for even more customer autonomy in-store.

CHANGES in budgeting for food will continue to shape how Filipinos shop, according to a study by marketing data and analytics company Kantar.

Due to tighter budgets, households allocated around half of their income to utilities, transportation, and food — with the latter accounting for the bulk of the money spent per month. Combined, this trio of expenses accounted for 46% of the expenditure share of Filipino homes in 2022, a decrease from 57% in 2020, according to the pilot release of Kantar’s Shopperscope study. 

The expenses of Filipino families have increased at a faster rate compared to the money they are earning, said Laurice Obana, shopper and consumer insight director for Kantar in the Philippines, in an Aug. 23 release sharing the study’s results. 

“While local households still prioritize basic needs and utilities on their monthly expenses, they have also developed five habits that will continue to impact and shape how they spend in the future, especially in the post-COVID era,” the study said. 

 Kantar broke down the five spending habits of 2,000 Filipinos and highlighted the changes between 2018 and 2022: 

  • Food budgeting

Filipinos spent 31% of their budget on fresh and packaged food this year, down from 37% when the pandemic began in 2020.  

The drop is due to Filipinos choosing to eat out again as quarantine restrictions are loosened, according to Kantar.  

  • Healthcare and coping

In 2022, Filipinos made sure to allocate part of their monthly budget on healthcare, which includes hospitalization, consultation, curative and maintenance medicines, and vitamins and supplements.   

However, families also spend to cope with the pandemic stress. Data shows that Filipinos turned to pets, seen in the increase in pet-care expenses, and to de-stressing items like alcohol and tobacco, which had a 4% rise in annual spending.  

  • Insurance

Kantar found that the pandemic also pushed Filipinos to increase their insurance, savings, and investments.   

Ms. Obana said that the intention to save may have been a direct result of quarantine restrictions, with less things or activities to spend on during the height of lockdowns, and uncertainties in employment.  

This was short-lived, though with the resumption of pre-COVID activities and the rising cost of goods, the company said in the study.  

  • Recreation

Recreation and outdoor celebrations have returned to pre-pandemic levels due to mobility, Kantar said.  

From almost zero travel spend in 2020, Filipinos in 2022 are now budgeting for vacations and other celebrations, resulting in a small increase in outdoor clothing and footwear purchases.  

  • Beauty products

A striking decrease was seen when it came to cosmetics and beauty products. It was only in 2022 that beauty and personal care brands regained momentum. 

Kantar also specified that Filipinos are considering buying products for a more “natural look” or those made from organic and natural ingredients. — Brontë H. Lacsamana

BusinessWorld One-on-One: “New Drivers of Growth for the Automotive Industry”

In line with BusinessWorld’s 35th anniversary celebration this year with the theme “Forward Faster”, the country’s most trusted business newspaper and multimedia content provider will be holding a BusinessWorld One-on-One series featuring some of the country’s topnotch thought leaders who will share with BusinessWorld Editor-in-Chief Wilfredo G. Reyes their expert insights about “Innovations Reshaping the Future of Key Industries”.

Watch Jose Maria M. Atienza, senior vice-president and division head for marketing new mobility and vehicle logistics of Toyota Motor Philippines, talk about “New Drivers of Growth for the Automotive Industry” on #BUSINESSWORLDONEONONE this August 22 at 11 a.m. on BusinessWorld’s and The Philippine STAR’s Facebook pages.

#BUSINESSWORLDONEONONE is supported by Asia Society – Philippines, British Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, Bank Marketing Association of the Philippines, European Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, Financial Executive Institute of the Philippines, Management Association of the Philippines, Makati Business Club, Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Philippine Franchise Association, People Management Association of the Philippines, and The Philippine STAR.