Home Blog Page 5580

Beermen, Tropang Giga collide in explosive Game 3

BEERMEN eye back-to-back victory against TNT. — PBA MEDIA

Game today
(MOA Arena)
5:45 p.m. — SMB vs TNT
*Series tied, 1-1

BACK-to-back or fightback?

San Miguel Beer (SMB) and titleholder TNT wage a fierce battle for the upperhand tonight in a deadlocked PBA Philippine Cup title duel that’s been true to form in terms of intensity and competitiveness through two matches.

The Tropang Giga rallied from 15 points down to wrest the opener, 86-84, leaning on Jayson Castro’s jumper at the death to pull through last Sunday. Then the former All-Filipino royalty Beermen, unleashing a strong finishing kick, countered with a 109-100 victory last Wednesday.

This makes the 5:45 p.m. Game 3 at the MOA Arena an explosive dispute for the driver’s seat in a series that’s been transformed into a virtual race-to-three affair from hereon.

“TNT is really a strong team. Well-oiled sila, well-coached, they know how to run their plays because they’ve been playing together for so long, including the national team,” said Beermen coach Leo Austria.

TNT tries to rebound and regain control in time for coach Chot Reyes’ return from his Lebanon trip with Gilas Pilipinas.

“The team’s mindset is to learn from the Game 2 loss and make our own adjustments and get ready for a tough Game 3,” said assistant coach Sandy Arespacochaga, who is manning the fort together with Yuri Escueta for the second straight game without Mr. Reyes.

One big source of concern for the Tropang Giga, though, is the condition of gunner Mikey Williams, who hurt his leg in the first quarter of Wednesday’s game and limped with seven points.

“Hopefully, Mikey (Williams) will be good to go. We still don’t know as of now,” said Mr. Arespacochaga.

Banged-up and all, Mr. Williams is determined to plunge into action.

“I’ll be ready for Game 3,” he said after the second game. “I will do whatever I have to do. If it’s a cryo chamber or an ice batch, I’ll figure out a way to get better.”

RR Pogoy has been on fire for TNT with Mr. Williams the primary target of SMB’s offense. The Cebuano sniper averages 27 markers in the series.

For San Miguel, June Mar Fajardo has been a rock. And if backup bigs Vic Manuel and Mo Tautuaa get in the mix just like in Game 2, that makes for an almost unstoppable force inside for the Beermen.

Messrs. Manuel and Tautuaa combined for 31 points and eight boards and sparked SMB’s breakaway at the start of the fourth.

Then there’s SMB’s veteran guard Chris Ross, who dished out 10 assists and grabbed seven rebounds to go with his four-point outing in their series-tying win.

“Chris Ross is distributing the ball very well,” said Mr. Austria. — Olmin Leyba

2022 US Open readies for tennis great Serena Williams’ retirement party

SERENA Williams will take her final bow on tennis’ biggest stage at Flushing Meadows but the US Open is unlikely to provide a fairytale finish for one of sport’s most fascinating figures.

Tennis has been preparing for this moment for a while, watching as Ms. Williams transitioned from champion, to mother, wife, entrepreneur and finally tennis part-timer but in some ways her decision seemed to catch everyone off guard. Even Ms. Williams herself.

Williams signaled her intention to retire in a Vogue article in early August, saying she was “evolving away from tennis” but never confirming the US Open as her final event.

The tennis world, however, is preparing a massive retirement party at Flushing Meadows.

Certainly there could be no more fitting place to bring the curtain down on one of tennis’ great careers in a city that has been in her corner from the very beginning, fuelling runs to six US Open crowns.

It is the place where Williams won the first of 23 singles Grand Slam titles in 1999 and if Hollywood were writing the script, it would also be where she would win her last, an elusive 24th major that would pull her level with Margaret Court at the top of the all-time list.

But even the most hardcore Williams supporters will find it difficult to believe the 40-year-old can conjure up that kind of magic.

“Emotions can only carry you so far, I don’t see a Cinderella happy ending where she wins the tournament,” Martina Navratilova, winner of 18 Grand Slam singles titles and the world’s top ranked player for 332 weeks, told Reuters.

“The way she has looked, it doesn’t look like she is going to make a miraculous comeback and win the tournament.”

As farewell tours go Ms. Williams’ has been more melancholy than joyful.

World number one for 319 weeks, Ms. Williams will arrive at the US Open ranked below 600 and unseeded. — Reuters

Brooklyn Nets

Make no mistake. General manager Sean Marks may have been the source of the press release that announced the desire of the Nets to collectively approach the 2022-23 season with the goal of claiming a championship together, but top dog Kevin Durant gave his imprimatur on the content. Outside of having the logo of his Thirty Five Ventures, his media and entertainment firm, on the statement, he had to first agree to drop his demand to be traded. If nothing else, it was no small feat for him to do so after having held his ground for the better part of two months. Imagine getting ready to bolt, only to take a 18-degree turn and stay put following a single meeting with personalities he hitherto couldn’t wait to be rid of.

“We have agreed to move forward with our partnership. We are focusing on basketball, with one collective goal in mind: build a lasting franchise to bring a championship to Brooklyn.” So said the release, which gave the impression that all is now well. In truth, it signals the beginning to what promises to be a tumultuous campaign for the hardware. The task is not impossible, of course, not with Durant slated to burn rubber with Kyrie Irving and Ben Simmons, and backstopped by such notables as Seth Curry, Joe Harris, and Patty Mills; on paper, the Nets have the skill set to go all the way.

On the other hand, there’s a reason the path to the Larry O’Brien Trophy is fraught with obstacles. Success isn’t as simple as getting together talents and then pointing out the direction they should take. There is a need for them to develop a sense of togetherness and esprit de corps, perhaps the most difficult ingredients to acquire even with the best brain trust on board. And, to be sure, the black and white do not have the latter; if Durant and Irving couldn’t wait to pack their bags, it’s in large measure because head coach Steve Nash looked decidedly overmatched in the hot seat.

In all likelihood, the Nets managed to achieve détente because there was simply no other choice. Durant may still be one of the best of the best in the National Basketball Association, but his $198-million price tag does not come with the certainty his four-year contract is supposed to bring with it. His sensitive nature and reluctance to underscore his leadership position vocally make him susceptible to sudden, seemingly whimsical, changes in mindset.

Winning cures everything, of course, and Durant and Company, even as currently constituted, have the wherewithal to rake in the wins. Not for nothing are the odds low, however; even assuming he puts his nose to the grindstone, the Nets cannot be as sure with Irving (who’s even more mercurial), Simmons (who’s a full year removed from action due to physical and mental issues), and Harris (who’s recovering from an ankle injury).

In other words, the Nets are a crapshoot, and Durant knows it. He does have control over his future, though: The situation is what it is, and he can either run from it or learn from it. And if he’s serious about his legacy, he would do well to frame it positively. Three years ago, he left the Warriors to be the definitive mover of his destiny. To argue that he’s overdue would be an understatement.

 

Anthony L. Cuaycong has been writing Courtside since BusinessWorld introduced a Sports section in 1994. He is a consultant on strategic planning, operations and Human Resources management, corporate communications, and business development.

Mahathir says Najib will likely get royal pardon

REUTERS

KUALA LUMPUR — Malaysia’s veteran politician Mahathir Mohamad said on Thursday that the disgraced former premier Najib Razak, who he helped bring down, was likely to receive a royal pardon and be released from a 12-year jail sentence for graft that he began this week.

Mr. Mahathir, whose historic election victory in 2018 triggered Mr. Najib’s downfall, said delays in various trials related to the multi-billion-dollar corruption scandal at state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) would result in justice being denied.

Mr. Najib was first convicted in 2020 but he appealed to higher courts. On Tuesday, the country’s top court rejected his final appeal and upheld his 12-year jail sentence and a 210 million ringgit ($46.88 million) fine for illegally receiving $10 million from a unit of 1MDB.

“For Najib, it is highly likely that he will be pardoned after being imprisoned,” the 97-year-old said in a statement.

He did not elaborate.

The palace of King Al-Sultan Abdullah, which received a petition for a pardon from Najib loyalists a day earlier, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr. Mahathir’s remark.

Mr. Najib is believed to be close to some of Malaysia’s royals, and in May, Mr. Najib’s social media posts showed him attending Eid celebrations with the king.

But, there has been no indication so far on how the palace would respond to any pardon application by Mr. Najib, who held power for nine years until 2018.

Nor has there been any sign yet of how Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob would regard a pardon for his old party leader, as he seeks to rehabilitate the image of the ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO).

Having been sent to jail on Tuesday after losing his final appeal in one of the smaller cases related to the siphoning off of money from the state fund he co-founded in 2009, Mr. Najib was back in court on Thursday for a hearing in the largest case.

He was brought from the Kajang prison complex southeast of the capital to the Kuala Lumpur high court in a black police car under heavy security and was taken to the courtroom through a private entrance.

Mr. Najib was seated in the dock, wearing a dark suit and tie, as the hearing commenced.

The charges laid against him in this case include 21 counts of money laundering and four counts of abuse of power for allegedly receiving illegal transfers of at least 2.3 billion ringgit ($512.93 million) between 2011 and 2014.

Mr. Najib also faces three other cases, and they all carry jail terms and heavy financial penalties.

Malaysian and US investigators say $4.5 billion was stolen from 1MDB, in a scandal that has implicated financial institutions and high-ranking officials worldwide. Over $1 billion was traced to Mr. Najib’s bank accounts.

The former prime minister also faces bankruptcy, which cannot be pardoned and which would prevent him from running for elections.

Najib has denied any wrongdoing, and has painted himself as the victim of a political vendetta by his former mentor.

Mr. Mahathir was already Malaysia’s longest serving prime minister when he first retired in 2003 after 22 years at the helm. He campaigned for Mr. Najib and UMNO during the 2013 election but turned against his former protege as the scale of corruption at 1MDB began to emerge.

Leading an opposition alliance of unlikely bedfellows, the nonagenarian Mahathir defeated the UMNO-led coalition, removing it from power for the first time since the formation of Malaysia six decades earlier.

Reinstalled as prime minister, Mr. Mahathir reopened probes into 1MDB that led to Mr. Najib facing a total of 42 charges. Mr. Mahathir subsequently resigned amid political turmoil as his alliance fell apart. — Reuters

Taiwan proposes large rise in defense spending amid China tensions

REUTERS

TAIPEI — Taiwan proposed $19 billion in defense spending for next year on Thursday, a double-digit increase on 2022 that includes funds for new fighter jets, weeks after China staged large-scale war games around the island it views as its sovereign territory.

China carried out its largest-ever military exercises around the democratically governed island after a visit this month by US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The trip infuriated Beijing, which saw it as an attempt by Washington to interfere in China’s internal affairs.

The overall proposed defense budget by President Tsai Ing-wen’s Cabinet sets a 13.9% year-on-year increase to a record T$586.3 billion ($19.41 billion).

That includes an additional T$108.3 billion in spending for fighter jets and other equipment, as well as other “special funds” for the defense ministry. A statement from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics did not provide a break down specifics on where the money would go.

The planned defense spending, which is a record high and must be approved by parliament, marks the island’s sixth consecutive year of growth in defense spending since 2017.

The double-digit rise on 2022 marks a sharp increase compared with the island’s defense spending growth in recent years; yearly growth has been below 4% since 2017.

Statistics department minister Chu Tzer-ming said the increase in defense spending will mainly go to operational costs.

“We always give safety and national security the top priority… that’s why (the budget for) operational costs rise greatly,” Mr. Chu said, pointing to costs such as fuel and maintenance for aircraft and ships dispatched to counter Chinese military activities near Taiwan.

Excluding the extra budget for military equipment and funds, proposed defense spending represents a 12.9% year-on-year increase, compared with a 20.8% increase in the overall government budget proposed for next year.

That proposed spending accounts for 14.6% of the government’s total spending for next year and is the fourth-largest spending segment, after social welfare and combined spending on education, science and culture, and economic development.

The island last year announced an extra defense budget of $8.69 billion by 2026, which came on top of its yearly military spending, mostly on naval weapons, including missiles and warships.

In March, China said it would spend 7.1% more on defense this year, setting the spending figure at 1.45 trillion yuan ($211.62 billion), though many experts suspect that is not the true figure, an assertion the government disputes.

China has been continuing its military activities near Taiwan, though on a reduced scale.

Live-fire drills will take place in a coastal part of China’s Fujian province on Friday and Saturday, just north of the tiny Taiwan-controlled Wuchiu islands in the Taiwan Strait, Fujian authorities said on Wednesday, announcing a no-sail zone.

Ms. Tsai has made modernizing the armed forces — well-armed but dwarfed by China’s — a priority.

China is spending on advanced equipment, including stealthy fighters and aircraft carriers, which Taiwan is trying to counter by putting more effort into weapons such as missiles that can strike far into its giant neighbor’s territory.

China has not ruled out using force to bring the island under its control. Taiwan rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims, saying that the People’s Republic of China has never ruled the island and that only Taiwan’s people can decide their future.

Meeting visiting Japanese academics at her office on Thursday, Ms. Tsai reiterated that the determination to protect their sovereignty, freedom and democracy would not change “due to pressure or threats”.

“At the same time, as a responsible member of the international community, Taiwan will not provoke incidents nor escalate conflicts,” Ms. Tsai said, in comments made live on her social media pages. — Reuters

Canada on track to exceed lofty 2022 immigration target

A PERSON stands in front of a Canadian flag in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Sept. 20, 2022. — REUTERS

CANADA is on track to exceed its immigration goal of granting permanent residency to more than 430,000 people in 2022, Immigration Minister Sean Fraser said on Wednesday.

Fraser, speaking to reporters in Vancouver, also announced a plan to hire up to 1,250 workers to tackle a record high number of immigration applicants.

Canada, which depends on immigration to drive its economy and support an aging population, has been ramping up annual immigration and has a goal of adding 451,000 permanent residents in 2024.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has relied on immigration to boost the Canadian economy since coming to power in 2015, setting an annual target of about 1% of the country’s population.

Official data released earlier this year showed Canada’s population rose to 37 million people in 2021, up 5.2% from 2016, driven mostly by immigration.

By end of July this year, Canada had added more than 275,000 permanent residents, Mr. Fraser said on Wednesday.

“This puts us well on track to exceed our goal of 431,000 permanent residents over the course of this year,” Mr. Fraser said.

With tighter border measures due to the coronavirus pandemic last year, Canada focused efforts on temporary residents already in the country to achieve a target of granting 401,000 foreigners’ permanent residency.

Canada had also processed some 3.73 million temporary residency applications by July, compared with 2.97 million applications during the same period a year ago.

“What we’re seeing right now is a record number of cases come in for applications and record productivity. But still the demand is exceeding our processing capacity for the time being,” Mr. Fraser said.

Mr. Fraser said about 54% of applications were considered in backlog, and the new hires would help to process them and reduce wait times for fresh applicants. — Reuters

As Ukraine war drags on, Russia is a tale of two economies

A GIRL WALKS on the square near the Moscow International Business Center, with a Soviet-era skyscraper seen in the background, in Moscow, Russia, Aug. 12. — REUTERS

IZHEVSK, Russia — Russia’s record employment signals a surprisingly smooth decoupling from the West. Its rapid replacement of McDonald’s and Starbucks says business as usual. Yet pressures are building inside its economic machine.

Six months into the Ukraine conflict, the strategies and struggles of Russia’s biggest automaker offers an insight into the contrasting fortunes of a country striving to withstand what Vladimir Putin calls an economic “blitzkrieg” by the West.

Avtovaz restarted production of its Lada brand this summer after it was halted in March in the face of Western sanctions, supply shortages and the loss of its French partner Renault. It has not formally laid off any of its 42,000 workers.

Nonetheless, the company’s feeling the heat, and it’s shrinking.

The bulk of the 3,200 workers at its factory in the industrial city of Izhevsk — where car production has not resumed — have been furloughed since March, with the company paying two-thirds of their wages, although some staff have been given temporary work around the factory on reduced hours.

This month, the automaker offered all Izhevsk workers one-off payments to quit as it looks to focus more production on its primary plant in Togliatti, 600 km away.

“It’s a choice between bad and terrible,” said Alexander Knyazev, referring to the dilemma over whether to take a 200,000 ruble ($3,400) severance payment or stay in his job in the Izhevsk’s stamped body parts workshop.

Last week he chose to walk away from the factory, which had paid him over 45,000 rubles per month.

“They don’t need so many technicians anymore.”

Asked how many workers had chosen to accept the severance, Avtovaz told Reuters it would disclose the final number after this month, adding that those workers on reduced hours would go back to a five-day week at the plant from Aug. 29.

The company did not elaborate on its plans for Izhevsk, though it said earlier this month it remained committed to the plant, which it said would be retooled to make the first Russian-made electric car, the Lada e-Largus, and would retain service and support functions.

“In the current situation of sanctions pressure and a growing number of variables, we are taking comprehensive measures to maintain employment,” Avtovaz President Maxim Sokolov said at the time.

Ruben Enkipolov, a professor of economics at Moscow’s New Economic School, said the auto sector’s struggles were being masked by “hidden unemployment”, where workers were not laid off but instead placed on indefinite furlough.

He said he expected unemployment to rise towards the end of the year, when he said it would likely become clear that sanctions were unlikely to be lifted in the near future.

“In Russia, economic crises don’t tend to produce mass unemployment because of the specifics of the Russian labor market like the furlough practice,” Enkipolov said.

The Russian economy ministry declined to comment for this article. This month, Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov dismissed any talk of a dramatic rise in joblessness, which official data pegged at a record low of 3.9% in June.

“I think that in autumn, we will move away from these record low numbers but let’s not over dramatize, the situation is under control,” he told a conference in Yekaterinburg.

In another sign of official optimism, amid high oil prices and popular policies to cushion the impact of inflation, latest government forecasts indicate the depth of Russia’s economic contraction will be less severe than previously feared this year.

SYMBOL OF SUCCESS
Autos is not the only Russian industry taking a hit from the showdown with the West.

In total, 236,000 Russian workers were either on furlough or reduced hours as of the end of July, according to Deputy Prime Minister Tatiana Golikova. They are not part of officially 3 million people registered as unemployed in Russia.

About half of all air traffic controllers, or 14,000 people, have been furloughed or put on part-time work, for example. Several foreign companies leaving Russia, from Swedish furniture giant Ikea to Spanish fashion chain Zara, have also furloughed staff.

Yet the auto sector has suffered more than most, with passenger car output dropping 62% in the first half of the year versus the same stretch in 2021, according to the state statistics agency.

Global carmakers including Volkswagen, Nissan, Hyundai Stellantis, Mitusubshi and Volvo, suspended their Russian operations and furloughed workers on the statutory two-thirds pay after Moscow launched its military campaign in Ukraine on Feb. 24.

That foreign exodus put more than 14,000 Russian auto workers on leave, according to a Reuters review of the industry.

The future of many of these workers is looking precarious as the conflict continues, a steep reversal for an industry that’s been a symbol of Russian success for decades, attracting foreign players and becoming one of the country’s largest employers.

An auto slump could have far-reaching economic consequences; the industry employed around 400,000 people in 2020, with around 10 times as many workers depending indirectly on the sector, according to government data.

JOBS AT KALASHNIKOV
Avtovaz has sought to adapt since Western sanctions severed Russia from many global supply chains and export markets, launching a series of simplified models with fewer hard-to-source foreign components.

In June, the company began production of a new, stripped-down Lada Granta, which comes without features such as remote keyless control or air conditioning, which rely on imported components.

Nevertheless, sales volumes have fallen by 63% in the first seven months of the year, to 85,000 vehicles, with production of the Lada Vesta, Lada X-Ray and Lada Largus models halted altogether, according to Avtovaz data.

In some places such as Izhevsk, other sectors may be picking up the slack.

Knyazev, who quit Avtovaz in Izhevsk, hopes to get a job at gunmaker Kalashnikov’s factory in the city, the capital of the Udmurtia region, about 1,300 km east of Moscow. Though even then, he said, he would likely be paid a lower wage than at the carmaker.

More than 100 former Avtovaz employees have already been hired by Kalashnikov, according to Tatyana Churakova, deputy prime minister of Udmurtia.

“We are working to do everything possible to arrange for all the employees who may leave the car plant to transfer to our other plants,” Churakova told Reuters.

‘NO ONE KNOWS ANYTHING’
Despite such efforts, half a year after launched its Russia’s “special military operation”, many people in this industrial city are contemplating an uncertain economic future.

Sergei, 58, a manager at the Avtovaz Izhevsk plant who declined to provide his last name, said he himself had decided not to take the severance payment.

“They don’t kick anyone out, whoever wants to stay stays. Many do want to stay,” he said at the factory’s exit gate. “No one knows anything at the moment. No big decisions have been made yet. Everyone is waiting.”

Avtovaz has said it plans to restart production of the Lada Vesta – halted at Izhevsk – at its main assembly plant in Togliatti in spring next year. It did not specify how it plans to secure supplies of parts currently unavailable from abroad due to the sanctions. — Reuters

Bryant widow awarded $16M over crash pics

ALEXANDRA WALT -FLKICKER

LOS ANGELES — The widow of the late basketball star Kobe Bryant was awarded $16 million by a jury on Wednesday over the sharing of photos of human remains at the helicopter crash site where her husband, their 13-year-old daughter Gianna and seven others were killed in 2020, according to multiple media reports.

Vanessa Bryant had sued Los Angeles County, alleging invasion of privacy, after accusing members of the Los Angeles County sheriff’s and fire departments of sharing gruesome images of the crash in unofficial settings, including to patrons in a bar.

Chris Chester, whose wife Sarah, 45, and daughter, Payton, 13, were among those killed in the crash and who joined Bryant’s lawsuit, was awarded $15 million, bringing the total jury award to $31 million.

Ms. Bryant, who was in the Los Angeles federal courtroom when the verdict was read out after an 11-day trial, clasped her face in her hands and wept. She and her attorney declined to speak to reporters as they left the courthouse.

Kobe Bryant, his daughter Gianna and seven other people died in the crash in Calabasas, Calif., on Jan. 26, 2020.

Vanessa Bryant has also filed lawsuits against the helicopter charter company and the deceased pilot’s estate.

The county already agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle a similar case brought by families of others who died in the crash.

Kobe Bryant was 41 when he died. The Los Angeles Lakers great and 18-time All-Star won five NBA championships and was elected to the Hall of Fame in 2020. — Reuters

Franchising platform sees signs of ‘revenge business’ among OFWs 

EASYFRANCHISE.COM

There are signs of “revenge business” on Easy Franchise, an online franchising platform. “We’re seeing a resurgence of people getting franchises,” said cofounder Rene “RJ” A. Ledesma, Jr.  

“A lot of OFWs (overseas Filipino workers) are investing and putting up franchises in their home provinces because many of them have contracts they know will expire in the future,” he told BusinessWorld in an Aug. 23 email. OFWs are reinvesting now so that their businesses will be operational by the time they get back home, he added.   

Essential services like water refilling stations and laundromats received the most interest. 

Easy Franchise is hosting a franchise sale on Aug. 28. Similar to double-digit sales days such as 10/10, 11/11, and 12/12, the event offers promos and discounts exclusive to the platform 

“Promos are already up to give people time to make a decision,” he said.  

Participating brands include Mister Donut, Cha Tuk Chak, H20 MineralPlus, Samgyup Express, Cycle House, and Lavada. 

Prior to the pandemic, the franchising industry contributed 7.8% to the country’s gross domestic product, according to the Philippine Franchise Association. — Patricia B. Mirasol

A coup of their own

FILIP ANDREJEVIC-UNSPLASH

The Philippines has had enough of the political crises triggered by the half-a-dozen attempted coup d’états against the Corazon Aquino administration (1986-1992) to last a lifetime.

But the next coup that should worry pro-democracy Filipinos will not be in this country — at least not yet. Some commentators are saying it is already happening — and in a most unlikely place: in the United States of America, which over the past 76 years has engineered “regime change” and instigated coups of its own against a number of governments in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

None of the foreign groups the US despises so much but a home-grown one is the source of the threat. No longer the same party of which Abraham Lincoln, who abolished slavery in 1865, was a leading member, the Republican Party (GOP — shorthand for Grand Old Party) of former President Donald Trump, said Washington Post columnist George Will, is “an insurgency,” and a “neo-fascist” organization, according to Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Emeritus Professor Noam Chomsky. It is in the middle of a campaign to seize total power by 2024, when Trump is likely to run for a second term.

Social critic Chomsky has described the campaign Trump and his allies are orchestrating as “a soft coup” intent on a Trump victory in 2024 regardless of whether he gets the necessary number of votes or not. The conspirators are concentrating on winning this year’s Nov. 8 midterm elections for Congresspersons and governors who would then appoint state officials who can be relied on to disenfranchise likely anti-Trump voters and manipulate the numbers so Trump can again be President.

They are making sure that their candidates in November do not only believe that the 2020 elections Trump lost to Joseph Biden were fraudulent, but are also diehard Trumpists. Trump endorsed for the GOP primary elections (which decide who will be its candidates in the midterm elections) only those party members who fit that category, while fulminating against the few Republicans who have dared challenge his claim that he won the 2020 Presidential elections.

One of the most prominent of the latter is Wyoming Representative Liz Cheney, the daughter of Richard Cheney, who was US Vice-President from 2001 to 2009. A conservative like her father, Cheney has a voting record in the House of Representatives of supporting Trump, but was among the 10 Republicans who voted with the Democrats to impeach him a few days before the end of his term in January 2021 for “inciting an insurrection” to prevent the official declaration of Joseph Biden as the 46th President of the United States. She is also the Vice-Chair of the bipartisan January 6th House Committee investigating the violent attempt on that date to keep Trump in power.

Her refusal to support Trump’s claims that he won a second term in 2020 and her constant warning to the US public of the threat to democracy posed by Trump and his fact-resistant, neo-fascist, and white supremacist supporters cost her seat in Congress. She is still the lone Wyoming Representative, but only until the end of the year, because she lost the GOP primary elections last week to a supporter of Trump’s “big lie” about the 2020 elections.

In testimony to the continuing hold of Trump on the GOP, most of those he supported won or are likely to win the party’s primaries. They will face Democratic Party candidates in the midterm elections, which are likely to result in the GOP’s regaining control of Congress, or at least the House of Representatives. Trump’s base among non-college graduate white workers is still intact, while Biden’s approval rating is at an abysmally low 41%. A GOP win this November would help Trump recapture the White House in 2024.

The January 6th 2021 attack by an armed mob of Trump supporters on the US Congress, in which the lives of its members and that of Vice-President Mike Pence were imperiled, and some police officers killed and injured, was encouraged by Trump.

It was a coup attempt that tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power, say analysts, and if it had succeeded it would have undermined the rule of law and the US Constitution. Some observers have gone even farther: they look at that incident as an attack on US democracy, which they say is “hanging by a thread” because of Trump and company’s continuing efforts to return to power at whatever cost.

Trump is facing a veritable legion of legal problems, ranging from allegations of tax fraud to unlawfully keeping in his Florida home classified documents vital to US national security. But those cases are likely to take some time to resolve, and could very well be dismissed should he succeed — through fair means or foul — in getting a second term, because the President is immune from suits arising from the performance of their official duties. Hence Trump’s focus on laying the groundwork now to assure his victory in 2024.

Whatever happens in the US will eventually have an impact on much of the world including the Philippines. But whether it is the Democrats or the Republicans who are in power does not make much of a difference in US foreign policy. That policy is primarily focused on preventing the rise of any other power that could challenge its global hegemony, part of which demands that countries such as the Philippines remain in its sphere of influence.

Despite the Democrats’ supposedly more enlightened perspectives, in furtherance of US strategic interests another Congressional delegation visited Taiwan only 17 days after the visit there of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Both contradict the “One China” principle enshrined in the 1972 Zhou Enlai/ Richard Nixon Shanghai Communique. Contrary to the supposed centrality of human rights in his foreign policy, Biden himself visited Saudi Arabia a month ago despite the apparent involvement of some of its highest officials in the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Kashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.

But as starkly demonstrative of the arrogance of power as those acts are, so can it be claimed that the seizure of power by a blatantly authoritarian, anti-immigrant, and racist regime could lead to, say, even harsher restrictions on immigration to the US as well as the further encouragement of hate crimes against people of color.

An even more aggressive US policy that could lead to a devastating war with China over the Taiwan question and/or the West Philippine Sea issue is also possible under such a regime. So is diminished support for global initiatives to address climate change — Trump and his minions think global warming is a hoax— as well as even less attention to the human rights record of authoritarian regimes while increasing military aid for them as long as they support the US against its Russian and Chinese rivals.

Like any coup in the less developed countries of the Third World, a coup in the US, even a “soft” one, would also be solely focused on advancing and defending the interests of its instigators and of the wing of the power elite it installs in power. The rest of the world would hardly matter.

But what is happening in the domestic politics of the United States has been largely unremarked in these isles and elsewhere. The next two years may prove that parochial indifference problematic, even catastrophic, for the Philippines and for much of the globe.

 

Luis V. Teodoro is on Facebook and Twitter (@luisteodoro).

www.luisteodoro.com

Najib: a case of being first

Najib Razak — WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM/WIKIPEDIA

I got a close look at Dato’ Sri Haji Mohammad Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak, Malaysia’s 6th prime minister, in one of those official functions of Malaysia’s government led by then Prime Minister (PM) Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, its 4th and then 7th head of state. From 1992-94, we served as research head of the Southeast Asian Central Banks (Seacen) Research and Training Center based in Kuala Lumpur. We could only be impressed by what we thought was a very orderly succession of leaders in Malaysia.

From the first PM, Tunku Abdul Rahman, to the 4th PM, Mahathir, the succession was straightforward. The successors were their deputies who were appointed to various ministries for well-rounded exposure to state governance. Being under a parliamentary system, the legislators were responsible for the execution of the national vision.

At that time, the fast-rising Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim, then finance minister and deputy PM, was widely considered Mahathir’s heir apparent.

But Mahathir and Anwar fell out on political succession, a shock to the otherwise sedate politics in this charming monarchial country of 13 states and three federal territories. Mahathir stripped Anwar of all his posts in 1998 and in the following year he was jailed for alleged sodomy and corruption. Emerging as the opposition leader, he was released five years later when his conviction was reversed by the High Court. Anwar was imprisoned again, and while detained rejoined Mahathir’s new coalition and helped in Mahathir’s 2018 victory. He received a royal pardon, his ticket to run again for Parliament.

What motivated Mahathir’s return to politics was his successors in Tun Abdullah bin Ahmad Badawi and Najib as Malaysia’s 5th and 6th leaders. Badawi was a loyal Mahathir follower but his leadership was tainted with alleged corruption, cronyism and poor performance in curbing it. Mass support of the ruling party was dwindling. In addition, he was openly biased towards Malaysia as an Islamic state. Chinese and Indian Malaysians believe that the country is a secular state that transcends religion.

In the case of Najib, he served as minister of defense twice, education minister during the Asian Financial Crisis, and finance minister during the Global Financial Crisis. As Badawi’s deputy, Najib succeeded him as the 6th PM from 2009-2018. His paternal provenance is unquestionable. The son of Abdul Razak, Malaysia’s 2nd PM, founding father of ruling coalition Barisian Nasional and pioneer of the Malaysian New Economic Policy, Najib had what it takes to succeed and continue his father’s legacy of integrity and leadership.

But Najib blew it.

In 2018, Malaysian police raided Najib and his wife Rosmah’s homes as part of the investigation of Malaysia’s sovereign wealth fund 1Malaysian Development Berhad’s (1MDB) financial scandal. They recovered 284 boxes containing luxury handbags and 72 bags overflowing with jewelry, cash, watches, and other valuables. Najib was subsequently convicted in July 2020 on seven counts converging on the transfer of public funds to his own private bank account. He was sentenced to serve 12 years and fined nearly $47 million. Najib appealed to delay serving his sentence.

But justice in Malaysia is fast and furious. A few days ago, after just two years, the High Court finally denied Najib’s appeal as he continued to deny any wrongdoing. It was obvious the Court did not give weight to, one, his defense that the fund transfer came from the Saudi royal family’s donation, and, two, he was misled by alleged fugitive financier Jho Low. The Court ruled that Najib’s appeal as “devoid of any merits,” claiming that the defense was internally inconsistent and failed to raise reasonable doubt.

The tell-tale signs have been undeniable.

Najib co-founded 1MDB in 2009 after assuming the PM post. Aside from those found in his homes, Najib was also reported to have acquired a Picasso painting, a jet, a superyacht, and hotels. The US lawsuit also claimed that 1MDB funds were used to finance a 2013 Hollywood film The Wolf of Wall Street.

Thus, as early as 2015, six years into his leadership of Malaysia, Najib was already reported in social media as a multibillionaire in ringgit. He became one of Forbes’ 50 richest in Malaysia.

Tracing bank transfers from various sources, including a private Swiss bank in Singapore and a finance corporation based in the British Virgin Islands, The Wall Street Journal and Sarawak Report documented them with actual bank account numbers. The trouble was that these fund transfers ended up allegedly in Najib’s own account at a private bank in Kuala Lumpur.

And yes, the ultimate source: 1MDB! Originally formed to “drive strategic initiatives for long-term economic development” of Malaysia, it is a public limited company engaged in energy, tourism, real estate, and agri-business. Beyond that, 1MDB was exposed to big-ticket, high-profile projects.

At the same time that those funds were allegedly funneled into Najib’s account, 1MDB had raised suspicion that it was also engaged in money laundering, fraud, and theft. No less than the US Justice department claimed that some $3.5 billion was stolen from the state-owned fund, later escalated to $4.5 billion.

What is intriguing is that 1MDB must have covered these fund transfers also from loans reaching $7.8 billion, later adjusted to $12 billion. This is one of the problems with a state-owned wealth fund. It is normally authorized to receive capital infusion from the government and to borrow to beef up its funds. It cuts both ways: it sucks money from the budget and bloats the state’s liabilities for private gains.

But even without a wealth fund, the same malfeasance could be committed. The government undertakes big infrastructure projects funded from the budget, and more often than not, these are supplemented by large borrowing. If bribery, kickbacks, or commissions are involved, the proceeds could ultimately accumulate in the bank accounts of the public official.

People in the know suspected that the 1MDB scandal could not have happened without the collusion of some international investment banks. As BBC reported three years ago, Goldman Sachs “helped raise $6.5 billion for the Malaysian development fund, advising on three bond offerings in 2012 and 2013.”

Malaysian prosecutors also alleged the embezzlement of some $2.7 billion for bribery and purchase of luxury goods. This was later confirmed when the Goldman lead banker pleaded guilty in US court of participating in bribery and money laundering. This was the basis for Malaysia’s attorney general to charge the investment bank with dishonest appropriation of the sovereign wealth fund.

This specific case is just one of Najib’s first five trials. There are other charges that he would have to face involving the disposition of 1MDB funds as well as allegations of audit tampering. Prosecution of these cases would take time because Najib has pleaded not guilty.

To answer the question in the minds of many, the prospects for a reversal of the conviction are almost impossible, Anwar commented in a recent CNBC interview. He must know because his own previous conviction never stood a chance. Anwar also suggested a possible clemency from the Malaysian king, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. But this route must be ruled out because the “financial impact of the 1MDB scandal” is just too consequential.

With his conviction, Najib chalks up a couple of firsts in the political history of Malaysia. He is the first PM to have been convicted and jailed for a criminal offense namely, corruption, abuse of power and money laundering. Political connections in Malaysia may still work but in this prominent case, Anwar warned that Najib should be prepared. “Prison … is tough, particularly compared to Najib’s lifestyle of seven-star hotels.”

Najib, as a convicted offender, is also the first PM to be prohibited from running for public office again. He is definitely disqualified as a candidate for Malaysia’s next general election in September next year. No one could argue that his four decades as a member of Parliament should count for something. He should have added to the illustrious legacy of his father as a public servant, rather than tarnishing it.

Through all the drama, the Philippines is challenged by the Malaysian justice system by proving its independence from politics, that Malaysia adheres to the rule of law. Based on media reports, many Malaysians “really wanted Najib to go to jail.” One can therefore claim that the biggest winner is the Malaysian people.

Writing a footnote about Najib’s “firsts” experience will be tricky. It will depend on those whom he will be leaving behind as he serves time in Kajang prison. As someone said, in life we pursue not conclusions but beginnings.

 

Diwa C. Guinigundo is the former deputy governor for the Monetary and Economics Sector, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). He served the BSP for 41 years. In 2001-2003, he was alternate executive director at the International Monetary Fund in Washington, DC. He is the senior pastor of the Fullness of Christ International Ministries in Mandaluyong.

People need to get back to the office

PETR MAGERA-UNSPLASH

Writer Malcolm Gladwell found himself an outlier when he commented on the need for people to get back to working in the office. Of course, in today’s world of the easily offended, such incredibly ordinary, commonsensical statement generated a ton of outrage.

Speaking to Steven Bartlett, host of the podcast Diary of a CEO, Gladwell pointed out that while “it’s a hassle to come into the office, but if you’re just sitting in your pajamas in your bedroom, is that the work life you want to live? Don’t you want to feel part of something?”

The problem is that “people in positions of leadership [are failing] to explain this effectively to their employees.” Hence, Gladwell laments, “as we face the battle that all organizations are facing now in getting people back into the office, it’s really hard to explain this core psychological truth, which is we want you to have a feeling of belonging and to feel necessary.”

Of course, it didn’t help that Gladwell has publicly professed his preference for working at home and his aversion to office desks. In a 2020 article for the Wall Street Journal, he admitted that most of his writing was done in coffee shops.

But that is neither here nor there: Gladwell is a writer and writing is oftentimes a solitary business. For most people, however, working in an office is just simply the better way.

Professional business consultant Liz Campbell wrote of “Four reasons why the office environment is still key to employees” (July 2021):

1. You can benefit from the culture of your organization — It is also much easier to create a culture of support and personal development when you have employees of all levels in the same space. An office space is often at the heart of your business culture.

2. It helps to maintain a healthy work-life balance — Even if you love your job, it’s not healthy to feel like you’re working during every waking hour.

3. The quality of your workplace is assured — For many, the office also offers an escape from distractions. Home-based working can often mean having to contend with spontaneous interruptions, whether that’s pets, children, or deliveries arriving at your door.

4. It’s easier to build relationships — Being in the office allows employees to connect with people they may not interact with daily. These spontaneous conversations over coffee or while passing in a corridor are hugely valuable. These moments can provide people with context about the business, sounding board advice, new ideas, collaboration opportunities.

Another important benefit of working in the office, according to workplace consultant Ashley Skinner (“Why your people still need the office,” February 2022), is that mentoring becomes much more effective: “In the office, managers can more easily spot the visual cues for when an employee needs that little bit of extra support. Bringing employees together in the workplace is also key to creating something called ‘osmosis learning.’ The 70-20-10 rule posits that 70% of learning happens through experience, 20% comes from observing colleagues and friends, and only the final 10% is down to formal training.

“Our survey throws weight behind these findings. When asked to rank the reasons they’d like to return to the office, ‘learning from others’ and ‘career progression’ were two of the top three answers. Exposure to senior staff is undoubtedly a key factor in supporting career development.”

The Gensler Research Institute’s 2020 US Work From Home Survey found employees feeling a deeper sense of isolation when working from home. Asked what are the top reasons workers want to come to the office: “Three out of four respondents said the people. When asked to rank the most important factors for wanting to come into the office, meetings with colleagues, socializing with people, and impromptu face-to-face interaction were the top three answers.”

Finally, and this reason may be the least popular but undoubtedly the most significant, is that people shouldn’t let themselves be too comfortable. Columbia law professor Tim Wu writes of “The tyranny of convenience” (February 2018): “We err in presuming convenience is always good, for it has a complex relationship with other ideals that we hold dear. Though understood and promoted as an instrument of liberation, convenience has a dark side. With its promise of smooth, effortless efficiency, it threatens to erase the sort of struggles and challenges that help give meaning to life. Created to free us, it can become a constraint on what we are willing to do, and thus in a subtle way it can enslave us.”

Doubtless rising transportation costs presents a problem but an even bigger problem is complete loss of income when one’s employment is closed due to lessened productivity. The simple fact is: working from home is not a viable long-term arrangement.

Like students that clearly need to go back to the classroom, those working need to go back to the office.

 

Jemy Gatdula is a senior fellow of the Philippine Council for Foreign Relations and a Philippine Judicial Academy law lecturer for constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence

www.facebook.com/jigatdula/

Twitter @jemygatdula