Home Blog Page 5318

Sotto named Australia NBL Fans Most Valuable Player

KAI SOTTO voted Australia NBL Fans MVP. — ADELAIDE 36ERS FACEBOOK PAGE

KAI Sotto is not leaving Adelaide without another feather in his cap.

The 7-foot-3 Filipino sensation has been named the Australia National Basketball League (NBL) Fans Most Valuable Player (MVP) for the second straight season before his departure to the Japan B. League.

Mr. Sotto personally received his award in the ceremony late Tuesday night as the NBL recognized his impact in and outside Australia, especially with the passionate Filipino fans worldwide rallying behind him all throughout.

It’s a fitting swan song for Mr. Sotto after a two-year stint with the 36ers, who was the first international pro team to trust the then Pinoy wunderkind from Ateneo.

The 20-year-old giant earlier this week announced his goodbye from Adelaide and the NBL as he opted to take his talents next in the Japan B. League with the Hiroshima Dragonflies.

Mr. Sotto only signed a short contract for the rest of the ongoing B. League regular season, setting the stage for another attempt in the NBA midway through the year. He’s dreaming to become the first Filipino homegrown player as his ultimate goal down the road.

In Japan, Mr. Sotto is expected to show a glimpse of his ceiling and boost that NBA bid after a limited but still developmental action in the NBL with averages of 6.98 points and 4.48 rebounds on 51-percent clip in over 13 minutes across 56 games.

Hiroshima, at fourth place with a 27-9 card, considers Mr. Sotto as one of the best Asian players today along with NBA stalwarts and Japanese national team members Rui Hachimura (LA Lakers) and Yuta Watanabe (Brooklyn Nets).

Mr. Sotto is also anticipated to fulfill his national team duty with Gilas Pilipinas soon being a member of the 24-man pool for the sixth and final window of the 2023 FIBA World Cup Asian Qualifiers on Feb. 24-27 against Jordan and Lebanon. — John Bryan Ulanday

Creamline battles Cignal; Choco Mucho collides with Petro Gazz

CREAMLINE Cool Smashers eye solo PVL lead. — PVL

Games Today
(Filoil EcoOil Center)
4 p.m. — Creamline vs Cignal
6 p.m. — Petro Gazz vs Choco Mucho

SIBLING rivals Creamline and Choco Mucho would like to head into their highly anticipated Valentines Day showdown at the Smart Araneta Coliseum with their guns ablaze.

It would be made more memorable though if they could play for something bigger than pride — the solo lead.

This, the Cool Smashers and the Flying Titans would like to achieve as they battle the Cignal HD Spikers and Petro Gazz Angels, respectively, today in the Premier Volleyball League (PVL) All-Filipino Conference at the Filoil EcoOil Center.

Creamline, the defending champion, routed old rival Petro Gazz, 25-18, 25-20, 25-22, while Choco Mucho was as lethal and merciless in turning back Akari, 25-15, 25-20, 25-20, in the league’s season-opener last Saturday at the Big Dome.

Both the Jonathan Ng-owned franchises showed balanced attacks and rock-solid defenses in overpowering their respective foes.

For Creamline, it was Michele Gumabao, Ced Domingo, Tots Carlos and Jeanette Panaga who took turns with 13, 13, 11 and 10 points, respectively, while Choco Mucho drew strength from Maddie Madayag, Kat Tolentino, skipper Bea de Leon and Isa Molde, who had 11, 11, 11 and 10 hits, respectively.

Choco Mucho’s triumph, however, proved more special for new coach Dante Alinsunurin and Ms. Madayag, who played her first full game since injuring her knee two years ago in Bacarra, Ilocos Norte.

“I’m happy that we win on my first game for Choco Mucho in PVL,” said Mr. Alinsunurin, who made his way into the pros after steering the national men’s team to a historic silver in the 2019 Southeast Asian Games in Manila.

“I’m so thankful to the coaching staff for giving me confidence,” said Ms. Madayag, who was adjudged Player of the Game.

Creamline and Choco Mucho share the lead with F2 Logistics, which edged PLDT, 25-22, 25-21, 14-25, 20-25, 16-14, and Chery Tiggo, a 27-25, 25-19, 25-22 winner over Cignal Tuesday at the PhilSports Arena.

But if they keep their winning ways, expect the Cool Smashers and the Flying Titans to generate more buzz and possibly break, if not match, the league-record of 19,000-plus the two set when they last faced each other in November a year ago at the MOA Arena. — Joey Villar

Fil-Spanish hurdler leads PHL team in Kazakhstan Asian Indoor Athletics

FIL-SPANISH hurdler John Cabang Tolentino spearheads the six-member Philippine team seeing action in the Asian Indoor Athletics Championships slated Feb. 10 to 12 in Astana, Kazakhstan with high hopes of making the national team.

The 21-year-old Mr. Tolentino will be joined by Southeast Asian Games gold medalist Eric Cray, whom the former could hope to succeed if and when the 34-year-old Fil-Am decides to call it career in the future.

Mr. Tolentino emailed the Philippine Athletics Track and Field Association and flew to the country in the Weekly Relay Finals in November last year to make his intention of running for the country and flag known.

He, in fact, will fund his own Astana trip, and show to the country that he truly means business.

And the nation could have a potential winner in its hands as Mr. Tolentino boasts of a personal best in the 110-meter hurdles of 13.74 seconds, which is faster than the national record of 13.78 set by Clinton Bautista in copping last year’s Hanoi SEA Games gold.

Apart from the two, long jumper Janry Ubas, heptathlete Sarah Dequinan, triple jumper Harry Diones and high jumper Leonard Grospe and coach Dario de Rosas are joining the squad.

The composition of the team was actually pruned down from the original 17 members that included World Championships pole-vault bronze winner EJ Obiena and SEA Games sprint gold medalist Kristina Knott due to budgetary constraints. — Joey Villar

Qatari investors set to bid for Manchester United

QATARI investors are planning to make a huge bid to buy Premier League club Manchester United, the Daily Mail newspaper reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed sources.

The report described the investors as “a group of private, high-wealth individuals” from Qatar, which hosted the 2022 World Cup.

Reuters has contacted Manchester United for comment.

Jim Ratcliffe’s company INEOS formally entered the bidding process to buy United last month after the club’s US owners, the Glazer family, said in November they had begun looking at options including new investment or a potential sale.

Bloomberg News reported last month that Qatar Sports Investments (QSI), which owns Paris St Germain, was considering either a total takeover or a stake in Manchester United or their rivals Liverpool.

United fans have been clamoring for a change of ownership and the Glazers have been the target of intense criticism as the team last won silverware back in 2017, lifting the Europa League and League Cup trophies.

In April, thousands protested outside Old Trafford, lighting flares and singing songs demanding the Glazers “get out of the club”.

United’s net debt, another bone of contention among fans, had grown to £515 million ($620.42 million) by September.

The team, managed by Erik ten Hag, are third in the league on 42 points after 21 games, three points behind Manchester City but eight adrift of leaders Arsenal, who have played a game less. — Reuters

PhilCare, Unilab subsidiary team up to make health services accessible

PhilCare President and CEO Jaeger Tanco with RelianceUnited President David San Pedro

Maestro Holdings, Inc. of the Tanco group of companies and RelianceUnited, a subsidiary of pharmaceutical company United Laboratories (Unilab), recently signed a partnership deal aimed at making healthcare services more accessible to their clients.

The partnership would give members of Maestro Holdings’ health maintenance organization PhilCare access to RelianceUnited’s full-service HealthFirst Clinic, PhilCare said in a statement.

The initiative “reflects our commitment to not just provide quality and smarter healthcare to our members, but to also make it more accessible in terms of costs and location,” PhilCare President and Chief Executive Officer Jaeger L. Tanco said.

“This is just the beginning of our wonderful journey as partners united in the mission to be a reliable healthcare provider to Filipinos,” he added.

Half of Filipinos do not have access to a nearby primary care facility — one that patients can reach in 30 minutes, according to the Department of Health.   

RelianceUnited said it hopes to provide “simpler and better” corporate healthcare to Filipino employees through its network of healthcare facilities and automated processes.

Under the partnership, PhilCare members can get consultations and laboratory diagnostic tests at HealthFirst Clinic branches in Metro Manila and Cebu. 

HealthFirst Clinic has branches in Mandaluyong, Cubao, Cebu, Alabang, and Eastwood. Another branch is set to open in Bonifacio Global City this year. 

“Through the partnership, we get to further live out our mission to deliver quality, personalized care in a cost-effective way to Filipinos,” RelianceUnited president David Y. San Pedro said.

“With our pursuit aligned, I believe PhilCare and HealthFirst will achieve more in the near future.”  

At the same time, PhilCare said the partnership gives members a special co-branded area in HealthFirst Clinic branches to avoid long queues.

It will also allow members to easily schedule annual medical exams and see lab results online. — Patricia B. Mirasol

It is about time

PRESIDENT Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. with DoH OIC Dr. Maria Rosario Vergeire during the PinasLakas vaccination program at the Pasig Sports Complex on Aug. 1, 2022. — PHILIPPINE STAR/KRIZ JOHN ROSALES

Why won’t the President make permanent, after almost seven months, the appointment of Maria Rosario Clarissa Dumandan Singh-Vergeire as Secretary of the Department of Health? Ms. Vergeire herself already made public recently her willingness to assume the position as a permanent appointee, subject to approval by the Commission on Appointments. What gives?

I don’t know Ms. Vergeire personally. I have not met her, and became aware of her only during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. I believe she is a career official, and will lose her status as such if she agrees to a presidential appointment to the Cabinet. Perhaps this was why she opted for “acting” status since July — just to warm the seat for someone else.

But at this point in her career, why still stop at sub-cabinet level? Isn’t it every bureaucrat’s dream to eventually lead one’s department, make one’s contribution, and then retire after reaching the peak of one’s government career? I guess this is why after “trying” the seat for six months, Ms. Vergeire is now ready to take the next step.

But how come the President doesn’t seem to be inclined? From where I sit, Ms. Vergeire seems to be doing okay. She has been acting secretary since July 2022, or for over six months now. I think this should suffice as her “probationary” period. If, by now, she still doesn’t enjoy the trust and confidence of the President, then maybe she should be replaced already?

Prior to becoming Acting Secretary of the Department of Health (DoH), Ms. Vergeire had been undersecretary as well as DoH spokesperson since 2015 under the Aquino II and Duterte administrations. She joined DoH in 2007 as a medical officer in the Health Policy Development and Planning Bureau. Before DoH, she was with the Marikina City Health Office for 11 years. While at DoH, she also had served as Officer-in-Charge Deputy Director General for Field Regulatory Operations at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Ms. Vergeire holds a bachelor’s degree in zoology from the University of Santo Tomas, a Doctor of Medicine degree from De La Salle College of Medicine, and a Master of Public Health degree from the University of the Philippines Manila. Incidentally, her father was a barangay chairman in Marikina, her mother practiced law, and her sister Maria Filomena Singh has been an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court since 2022.

This background, in my opinion, gives Ms. Vergeire an edge over other possible candidates for the DoH post. After all, as Cabinet secretary, her decisions will always have political and legal implications. And, perhaps she has her family to “consult” regarding these things over Sunday lunches. Moreover, Ms. Vergeire is a career official, one who rose from the ranks.

But, more important, having served first with the Marikina City Health Office — under a local government unit — prior to joining the national office gives her experience and understanding of how the Philippine health system works. Since the devolution of health services to LGUs in 1992, the Philippine health system has been somewhat confusing. But she has first-hand understanding of how the system can work better.

Also, her experience with the FDA gave her a glimpse of the inner workings particularly of the pharmaceutical industry, medicine production and licensing, and perhaps the operations of pharmacies. Then her involvement with the DoH policy office gave her broader perspective on necessary reforms in the health system.

Ms. Vergeire’s direct involvement in DoH operations during the height of the pandemic also gave the public a clearer view of her ability to deal with medical crises. Her experience of having gone through something like that, and being at the center of daily operations, is a major plus factor for her. Continuity and consistency prompt her permanent appointment while the public health emergency remains.

And last but not least, even after her permanent appointment, if she fails to perform, or loses the trust and confidence of the President, there is always the Malacañang option to ask her to step down and give way to someone else. In short, a permanent appointment is not the end-game for the Marcos administration. So, why not give her the chance?

As I wrote in a previous column, I believe the Philippine government should already be planning on when to end the national public health emergency. And while the global pandemic is still far from over, the Philippines is surely doing better now than in 2020 and 2021, also to the credit of Ms. Vergeire and her colleagues at DoH from 2020 to 2022.

Even the World Health Organization (WHO) noted that the pandemic may be already at a “transition point,” although it remains a “public health emergency of international concern.” But while this may be the case, Ms. Vergeire has told the public that the government was unlikely to revive COVID restrictions at this point, also noting that the Philippines no longer maintained an “official monitoring system” for COVID.

She had told a press briefing, “Our cases are already manageable. Our citizens have adopted good behavior of wearing masks. Our vaccination, although we have low booster rate, we are at 94% in our primary doses… We are better prepared than before. We can say that our cases here are manageable,” noting that certain health protocols could already be dropped.

“Our COVID-19 responses are already institutionalized. These include our surveillance efforts, genome sequencing, and case monitoring. We don’t need a public emergency or state of calamity declared for that,” Ms. Vergeire added, further boosting the argument that perhaps it is already time for the government to withdraw the declaration of a public health emergency.

What has not been “institutionalized,” however, is the leadership at DoH. Most everything is already in place for the country to veer away from emergency status and to stand down. In this line, I believe the next crucial step is the appointment of a permanent DoH secretary. Ms. Vergeire seems ready.

 

Marvin Tort is a former managing editor of BusinessWorld, and a former chairman of the Philippine Press Council

matort@yahoo.com

Innovation insights: Energy transformation accelerates

SHARON §PITTAWAY-UNSPLASH
SHARON §PITTAWAY-UNSPLASH

2022 was a very eventful year. Inflation, the continued spread of COVID-19 — which led to divergent government reopening responses — and a land war in the breadbasket of Europe were all new things many of us have not seen in our lifetimes. As we look ahead, we still believe we are in the initial stages of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, we still believe innova-tion is accelerating, and we still believe in the value of active management, particularly when investing in innovation. 2022 and 2023 will be remembered as the period when developed markets, specifically Western Europe and America, increased their focus on and investment in energy transformation from fossil fuels to renewables. The war between Russia and Ukraine was the spark. The resulting legislation from the US in the form of the Inflation Reduction Act and the expected matching legislation from the EU provide the economic incentive.

SHOCKS ARE ACCELERATING THE ENERGY TRANSFORMATION
When making predictions as an investor, we think it is best to invest and make predictions where one has the highest confidence. Over the past several years, we have framed our views on innovation around five distinct platforms: Disruptive Commerce, Genomic Advancements, Intelligent Machines, New Finance, and Exponential Data. These platforms were never meant to be static; they are intended to change and rise and fall in importance as new themes emerge, evolve and dissolve.

For example, 20 years ago, our platforms may have reflected expectations for growth in personal computers, client-server software, and biotechnology. Today, we see New Finance dissolving into two already existing platforms: Exponential Data, as data generated and blockchain technology lead to further pricing efficiencies in capital and lending, and Disruptive Commerce, as payments have become a major piece of e-commerce infrastructure.

Innovation is everywhere. As one platform is dissolved, another platform emerges: Energy Transformation. This is not a new idea; addressing climate change and lowering carbon emissions has been a goal for industrialized economies for decades. However, as we wrote early last year,1 external shocks can accelerate growth. We believe the Russia-Ukraine war coupled with — not coincidentally but, in part as a response to the war — the passing of the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) encourages new types of energy generation in the United States. Taken together, this represents a turning point that should lead to materially higher implementation of new innovations in the energy space.

Transforming our energy sources from fossil fuels will be one of the largest capital expendi-tures in history. Historically it has taken 50 to 60 years to transition an economy to a new energy source.2 It will require increased production from multiple sources including solar, wind, hydrogen, nuclear, water, geothermal and new forms of energy.3 Each of these production methods will likely receive more funding, which we believe will lead to more innovation and new solutions.

In addition to production innovation, the increased complexity of the grid4, 5 will lead to more investment in the distribution of energy, not only on a commercial scale as intermittency will become more frequent and will make energy more complex to route, but also on a residential scale, as resilience against power outages encourages more individual homeowners to choose to generate their own energy or backup power.

Finally, we believe energy consumption patterns will change, with a focus on optimization through energy efficiency, electrification (when feasible), data-driven feedback to improve processes, and distributed solutions to provide flexibility at smaller scales. Energy is the lynchpin to an industrialized economy, and economies with structurally lower energy prices — those with a resilience to shocks — have an embedded cost advantage. As the world becomes more multi-polar, energy security will rise in importance and be more critical for economic competitiveness.

We therefore recognize the innovative potential of Energy Transformation technologies to seize this moment and believe active management is necessary to navigate the hype cycles and find the profit pools. n

1 Moberg, Matthew, Rogal, Kelly, “Innovation insights: War, pandemic & inflation — do shocks accelerate innovation? We think so,” Franklin Templeton Insights, June 22, 2022.

2 Vaclav, Smil, “A Global Transition to Renewable Energy Will Take Many Decades,” Scientific American, Jan. 1, 2014.

3 “Annual Energy Outlook 2022: with projections to 2050,” US Energy Information Administration, 2022.

4 “The Future of Electric Power in the United States,” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2021.

5 “How to increase grid resilience through targeted investments,” McKinsey & Company, Dec. 20, 2021.

 

Matt Moberg is a portfolio manager at the Franklin Equity Group.

The robots coming for our jobs will also help fire us

BRETT JORDAN-UNSPLASH

FOR THOSE who take a sadistic pleasure in looking for evidence that we are creeping closer to a dystopian future where humans are ruled by their robot overlords, consider this possible nightmare scenario: Artificial intelligence (AI) is not only coming for your job but will have a hand in laying you off, too.

AI has already infiltrated multiple parts of the human resources process, from hiring to onboarding to training to evaluating. It’s not a huge stretch to think that in an efficiency-obsessed sector like technology, tools designed to streamline decision-making are now making their way into layoffs. The conditions here are ripe for it: Tech’s nearly 42,000 job cuts last month were the second highest on record for the sector, according to data from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

One of the reasons we know there’s a movement toward automating parts of so-called “workforce reduction” is because human resources executives have admitted to it: A report last month from Capterra, an arm of tech industry research firm Gartner, Inc., found that 98% of the HR leaders it surveyed said they would at least somewhat rely on software and algorithms to reduce labor costs in a 2023 recession.

For hourly workers, management by algorithm is nothing new. In 2021, for example, Bloomberg News reported that Amazon.com, Inc. was tracking every move of its Flex delivery drivers, some of whom were fired by automated e-mail when the company’s algorithms decided the workers were falling down on the job. The information deluge that Amazon collects on these independent contractors is what makes it possible for algorithms to evaluate performance, but the volume of data also makes it easier for proponents of AI to argue that these tools are necessary; it’s far too many inputs for a human to possibly interpret.

Office workers have until recently escaped such intense scrutiny, in large part because the data to track them in the same way hasn’t existed. But that’s changing with the increasing popularity of the workforce productivity score, and the growing inclination and ability to closely monitor not just whether employees are in front of their keyboards but their every keystroke and mouse click.

To be clear, I’m not suggesting HR managers will simply push a button and out will pop a pile of pink slips (and along with that a whole bunch of legal and reputational issues), although it’s almost guaranteed someone will try. The greater likelihood is that AI helps narrow the pool and provides a first pass before a human gets involved — akin to what happens in the hiring process now.

This might seem like the holy grail for HR managers, a chance to remove the emotion from layoffs, and shift the blame and bad feelings from humans to machines. But we know that’s not how AI works. As the edict goes, bad data in, bad data out. And there’s plenty of evidence that the data companies already rely on for employee evaluations is far from perfect.

Capterra analyst Brian Westfall told me that while 70% of HR leaders say they would use performance metrics in layoff decisions, a higher percentage report that they are considering changing performance evaluations because they think the process is flawed. Even the HR leaders in the Capterra study who said they would rely on software and algorithms to cut labor costs in a 2023 recession were wary of the technology. Only half said they are completely confident that these tools will produce unbiased recommendations, while 47% reported being completely comfortable making layoff decisions based on these recommendations.

Rather than remove bias from a round of messy and uncomfortable layoffs, AI has the potential to encode it. Several experts pointed me to another Amazon example, in which the tech giant tried to build an automated tool to narrow down a pool of job applicants. Its engineers trained the system to look at the historical data on people who had submitted resumes in the past. But because tech is a male-dominated industry and most past candidates were men, women who applied for technical jobs were penalized by the algorithm. (Reuters reported that Amazon abandoned the program, with the company saying it never used the tool to evaluate candidates.)

It’s yet another case study of how AI has the potential to make us forget that human resources is about, well, humans. We are steadily marching toward a robotic apathy now, with reports of some tech employees being told by e-mail that they had lost their jobs rather than by an actual person. Today we readily acknowledge that a layoff can be one of life’s most traumatic events. Somehow that doesn’t seem to square with turning such a devastating decision over to algorithms — especially when we readily acknowledge that we don’t really trust them.

BLOOMBERG OPINION

News is just another game to watch

ASHNI-UNSPLASH

EVEN ON OUR PHONES, the news pops up as headlines that can be tracked to the source for the details. The ubiquitous goings-on around the world keep us attached to situations in other time zones. These include the progress (or lack thereof) of the invasion of Ukraine, the ups and downs of discovered documents in the US, the fall of governments in countries nearby.

With news so accessible, we know what’s going on in other parts of the world, especially in its media capital which is the USA. Maybe if we spoke French or German beyond “where is the nearest subway?” we would also tune in on Davos.

Because of the limitation on language and maybe common interests, our attention (maybe even obsession) focuses on America making us faux experts on what is happening there. Our knowledge is filtered by the biases and political leanings of the media outlets that we track. Might we feel ready to be talking heads and instant resource persons ourselves spouting second-hand knowledge and analysis, at least around the dining table?

Following the news has become a spectator sport, just another game to watch. You don’t like that raspy heavily accented voice in the local news? Switch to the other team led by someone with a more interesting hairdo. As in sports there are in the news villains and heroes, unforced errors (Did you need to make another trip?), and cheering squads, as well as victory over visiting teams.

It is not mere curiosity that engages us to follow events around the world like meteorologists tracking typhoons and their expected landfall. We excuse this trivial pursuit by telling ourselves that what happens in the world somehow has an impact on us. This helps us feel engaged in what’s going on in Vietnam too. It makes our appreciation of noodles more meaningful.

Here are some similarities between news and our favorite spectator sports like that box-office breaking seventh game recently.

The referees — news editors and talking heads — don’t always catch the infractions and the players get away with a charging foul and even get to make a bonus free throw. Is this biased officiating? Not always, but often enough.

Unforced errors by newsmakers can shift the narrative from a story of economic recovery to noted absences in local crisis like the price of onions and the manhandling of an airline crew. Just like an unguarded basketball player bringing down the ball from the backcourt, being too slow to cross the mid-court and get called for a six-second violation, lack of focus can throw the game away.

Like all sports spectators, we sometimes feel like experts and discuss where the coaching went awry.

The news medium’s penchant for sound bites simplifies, if not distort, complicated issues. (Aren’t all world issues complicated?) This is no different from acquiring literary appreciation from watching movie versions of books without needing to read the original. Okay, maybe Lolita in the movies may be more interesting than reading Nabokov’s tale of a middle-aged man’s fascination with a girl with slipped sunglasses licking a lollipop. (It’s sugar-free.)

International news channels occasionally include unimportant countries like ours to justify their world coverage, and Asia-wide reach. Globally, our role as a worthy news topic involves mayhem events such as an airport crisis and typhoon victims. Still, with our OFWs spread all over the world, maybe local news has a global following.

We always get back to local news as we struggle with more recognizable situations like an icing-rubbing incident on a waiter or the release of a noontime host on bail. What about the still-jailed senator and the quickly absolved dope runner?

Even with the appointment of a communications officer for the seat of power, not much news on the palace leaks out. It’s as if the office has been instructed to avoid feeding the media. And that seems to be working. There are no confirmations or denials, just nobody there. Don’t you miss the fat guy with elaborate denials on the leader’s medical condition?

Citizens with single passports like most of us are exposed to real life as news. Local events are seen in one’s neighborhood and through one’s car windows when stuck in traffic. News is what is happening around us, unedited, with the sound turned up…and with no commercial breaks.

 

Tony Samson is chairman and CEO of TOUCH xda

ar.samson@yahoo.com

In State of the Union speech, Biden challenges Republicans on debt and economy

PRESIDENT Joseph R. Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the US Capitol, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2023, in Washington, as Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of Calif., applaud. — JACQUELYN MARTIN/POOL VIA REUTERS

WASHINGTON — President Joseph R. Biden challenged Republicans to lift the US debt ceiling and support tax policies that were friendlier to middle class Americans on Tuesday in a State of the Union speech that served as a blueprint for his 2024 re-election campaign.

Assailing oil companies for making high profits and corporate America for taking advantage of consumers, Mr. Biden used his primetime speech to outline progressive priorities of his Democratic Party that are anathema to many Republican lawmakers.

Making his first address to a joint session of Congress since Republicans took control of the House of Representatives in January, Mr. Biden pledged to work with opposition lawmakers even as he sparred with them in the chamber.

“To my Republican friends, if we could work together in the last Congress, there is no reason we can’t work together and find consensus on important things in this Congress as well,” he said.

Some Republicans heckled and jeered him at times during a speech that lasted some 73 minutes.

Mr. Biden took them on, challenging Republicans to raise the $31.4 trillion debt ceiling, which must be lifted in the coming months to avoid a default. The White House has said Mr. Biden will not negotiate over that necessity; Republicans want spending cuts in exchange for their support.

“Some of my Republican friends want to take the economy hostage — I get it — unless I agree to their economic plans. All of you at home should know what those plans are. Instead of making the wealthy pay their fair share, some Republicans … want Medicare and Social Security to sunset,” he said, drawing boos.

He then urged lawmakers to stand up for senior citizens, which they did, prompting Mr. Biden to claim victory. “I enjoy conversion,” he quipped, suggesting such cuts to the social safety net programs popular with voters were now off the table.

The back-and-forth underscored Mr. Biden’s apparent comfort in Congress, where he engaged in debates as a US senator for 36 years.

“Joe Biden sparring with the crowd and winning wasn’t something I expected,” said former Representative Adam Kinzinger, a Republican, on Twitter.

The president called for reforms in policing after Tyre Nichols, a Black man, died last month after being beaten by officers in Memphis, Tennessee. Mr. Nichols’ mother and stepfather were among the guests at the speech.

Highlighting topics that could feature prominently in a re-election campaign, Mr. Biden said the economy was benefiting from 12 million new jobs, COVID-19 no longer controls American lives, and US democracy remains intact despite facing its biggest threat since the Civil War.

“Today, though bruised, our democracy remains unbowed and unbroken,” he said.

As a candidate in 2020 and at his inauguration in 2021, shortly after the Jan. 6 attack on the US Capitol, Mr. Biden said he wanted to unify the country. And he stuck to that theme, highlighting a massive infrastructure bill and ribbing Republican lawmakers who opposed it.

“I want to thank my Republican friends who voted for the law,” he said. “My Republican friends who voted against it … I still get asked to fund the projects in those districts as well, but don’t worry, I promised I’d be a president for all Americans.”

POLL PROBLEMS
Despite his efforts, Mr. Biden remains unpopular.

His public approval rating edged one percentage point higher to 41% in a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll that closed on Sunday. That is close to the lowest level of his presidency, with 65% of Americans saying they believe the country is on the wrong track, compared to 58% a year earlier.

Similarly, in the autumn of 2020, when Donald Trump was president, 65% of registered voters believed the country was on the wrong track, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling.

Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who once served as press secretary for Mr. Trump, rejected Mr. Biden’s upbeat vision of the country in her Republican response to his address.

“In the radical left’s America, Washington taxes you and lights your hard-earned money on fire. But you get crushed with high gas prices, empty grocery shelves, and our children are taught to hate one another on account of their race,” Ms. Sanders said in her televised remarks.

Mr. Biden aides see the speech as a milestone ahead of the second presidential campaign he is expected to launch in coming weeks.

Mr. Biden turned 80 in November and, if re-elected, would be 82 at the start of a second term, a fact that concerns many Democratic voters, recent polls show. 

DIVIDED REPUBLICANS
Mr. Biden faced a splintered gathering of Republican lawmakers, eager to put their conservative mark on US policy following four years of Democratic control of the House.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a Republican who has faced challenges unifying lawmakers from his party, sat behind Mr. Biden during the address for the first time. “Mr. Speaker, I don’t want to ruin your reputation, but I look forward to working with you,” Mr. Biden said, drawing laughs.

Mr. McCarthy and Vice President Kamala Harris smiled and chatted from the dais before Mr. Biden’s arrival.

I respect the other side,” Mr. McCarthy said earlier on Tuesday in a video. “I can disagree on policy. But I want to make sure this country is stronger, economically sound, energy independent, secure and accountable.”

Some House Republican lawmakers have questioned Mr. Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential race against Mr. Trump, vowing to investigate his Cabinet and family.

Mr. Biden hailed the resilience and strength of the US economy, with unemployment having dropped to a nearly 54-year low in January.

He hammered corporations for profiteering from the pandemic and ran through a wish list of economic proposals, many of which are unlikely to be passed by Congress. They included a minimum tax for billionaires and a quadrupling of the tax on corporate stock buybacks.

Mr. Biden was especially critical of oil companies’ profits. “I think it’s outrageous,” he said. He said the United States would need oil for at least another decade, drawing laughter from some in the chamber. — Reuters

Grocery costs expected to rise further in 2023

CORPORATE.WALMART.COM

LONDON — Shoppers around the world will pay even more for groceries this year than they did in 2022, according to retailers, consumer goods firms and investors, unless commodity costs decline or the shift to cheaper store-brand products accelerates.

Retailers and consumer goods producers have been stuck in tough price negotiations for more than a year now, with friction beginning in 2021 over COVID-related supply chain logjams.

This has since ballooned into fights over the high cost of raw materials and energy in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, with rising prices of basic foodstuffs from bread to milk and meat exacerbating a cost-of-living crisis in Europe.

Britons paid a record 16.7% more for food in the four weeks to Jan. 22 compared to the same period last year, according to research firm Kantar. The US food index, including meals eaten at home and in cafes and restaurants, increased 10.4% for the year ended in December.

Mark Schneider, CEO of the world’s biggest food group Nestle, last week told a German newspaper it would have to raise prices of its food products further this year to offset higher production costs that it has yet to fully pass on to consumers.

“Investors will pay a premium for companies that exhibit pricing power in their portfolio without adversely impacting volumes and market share,” Jack Martin, a fund manager at Oberon Investments, said.

Big, packaged-goods companies’ margins have been squeezed by higher input costs for over a year as the price of ingredients like wheat and sunflower oil have skyrocketed since the Ukraine war began last February.

Unilever, which is due to report full-year results on Thursday, said in October that its underlying price growth — an indicator of pricing — rose to a record 12.5% in the third quarter. Nestle and dairy giant Danone are due to report results later this month.

Tineke Frikkee, a portfolio manager at Waverton Investment Management, expects Unilever to hike prices in 2023, though selectively.

“The last time we heard from Unilever, it was made clear that they prefer to sell fewer products at higher prices, to keep prices below peers and gain market share,” Ms. Frikkee said.

RETAILER PUSHBACK
Consumer goods manufacturers — will continue to raise prices until they recover their profitability, said Bernstein analyst Bruno Monteyne.

“The only thing that can stop this is…consumers starting to trade down to private-label products at a more rapid pace … (and) if commodities keep declining, then there may be no need for more price increases.”

In December, the CEO of Walmart, the world’s biggest retailer, warned that some “packaged goods suppliers are still pointing us towards more inflation next year on top of the mid-double digits this year”.

“Dry grocery and consumables have double-digit to mid-double-digit inflation that feels stubborn to us,” Doug McMillon said, adding that suppliers were being encouraged to focus on “the longer term with us”.

European retailers are also pushing back.

“With the big suppliers, we do insist on long-term contracts that do not have to be renegotiated,” Belgian discount retailer Colruyt told Reuters.

Britain’s biggest supermarket group Tesco and Kraft Heinz last year could not agree on prices for some brands, resulting in several products disappearing from shelves. This month, Unilever’s Hellmann’s mayonnaise was discontinued in South African stores due to cost inflation.

Tesco CEO Ken Murphy said last month he was hopeful inflation would peak by mid-2023 and then start to ebb.

Barclays analyst Warren Ackerman said although food commodity prices on average were down 20% from March peaks, it will take time for this to reflect in companies’ costs. — Reuters

Rescuers in Turkey expect death toll to rise

SAMAR AL BRADAN-UNSPLASH

KAHRAMANMARAS/ANTAKYA, Turkey — Families in southern Turkey and Syria spent a second night in the freezing cold on Wednesday as overwhelmed rescuers raced to pull people from the rubble two days after a massive earthquake that killed more than 9,600 people.

In Turkey, dozens of bodies, some covered in blankets and sheets and others in body bags, were lined up on the ground outside a hospital in Hatay province.

Many in the disaster zone had slept their cars or in the streets under blankets, fearful of going back into buildings shaken by the 7.8 magnitude tremor — already Turkey’s deadliest since 1999 — that hit in the early hours of Monday.

Rescuers there and in neighboring Syria warned that the death toll would keep rising as some survivors said help had yet to arrive.

“Where are the tents, where are food trucks?” said Melek, 64, in the southern Turkish city of Antakya, adding that she had not seen any rescue teams.

“We haven’t seen any food distribution here, unlike previous disasters in our country. We survived the earthquake, but we will die here due to hunger or cold here.”

With the scale of the disaster becoming ever more apparent, the death toll rose above 7,100 in Turkey. In Syria, already devastated by 11 years of war, the confirmed toll climbed to more than 2,500 overnight, according to the Syrian government and a rescue service operating in the rebel-held northwest.

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan has declared a state of emergency in 10 provinces. But residents in several damaged Turkish cities have voiced anger and despair at what they said was a slow and inadequate response by the authorities.

Mr. Erdogan, facing a close-fought election in May, is expected to visit some of the affected areas on Wednesday.

The initial quake, followed hours later by a second one almost as powerful, struck just after 4 a.m. on Monday, giving the sleeping population little chance to react.

It toppled thousands of buildings including hospitals, schools and apartment blocks, injured tens of thousands, and left countless people homeless in Turkey and northern Syria.

Turkish authorities say some 13.5 million people were affected in an area spanning roughly 450 km (280 miles) from Adana in the west to Diyarbakir in the east — broader than the distance between Boston and Philadelphia, or Amsterdam and Paris.

In Syria, it killed people as far south as Hama, some 100km from the epicenter.

Turkey’s disaster management agency said the number of injured was above 38,000.

‘UNDER THE RUBBLE’
In the town of Jandaris in northern Syria, rescue workers and residents said dozens of buildings had collapsed.

Standing around the wreckage of what had been a 32-apartment building, relatives of people who had lived there said they had seen no one removed alive. A lack of heavy equipment to remove large concrete slabs was impeding rescue efforts.

Rescue workers have struggled to reach some of the worst-hit areas, held back by destroyed roads, poor weather and a lack of resources and heavy equipment. Some areas are without fuel and electricity.

Aid officials voiced particular concern about the situation in Syria, where humanitarian needs were already greater than at any point since the eruption of a conflict that has partitioned the nation and is complicating relief efforts.

The head of the World Health Organization has said the rescue efforts face a race against time, with the chances of finding survivors alive slipping away with every minute and hour.

In Syria, a rescue service operating in the insurgent-held northwest said the number of dead had climbed to more than 1,280 and more than 2,600 were injured.

“The number is expected to rise significantly due to the presence of hundreds of families under the rubble, more than 50 hours after the earthquake,” the rescue service said on Twitter.

Overnight, the Syrian health minister said the number of dead in government-held areas rose to 1,250, the state-run al-Ikhbariya news outlet reported on its Telegram feed. The number of wounded was 2,054, he said.

Turkey’s deadliest earthquake in a generation has handed Mr. Erdogan a huge rescue and reconstruction challenge, which will overshadow the run-up to the May elections already set to be the toughest of his two decades in power.

The vote, too close to call according to polls before the quake, will determine how Turkey is governed, where its economy is headed and what role the regional power and NATO member may play to ease conflict in Ukraine and the Middle East. — Reuters

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT