Facebook Instagram Linkedin X Youtube
Home Blog Page 1781

Monde Nissin allots P7.55-B capex

PHILIPPINE STAR/ MIGUEL DE GUZMAN

LISTED food and beverage producer Monde Nissin Corp. has earmarked P7.55 billion in capital expenditure (capex) for 2025, the bulk of which will be used for a new plant in Northern Luzon.

“We had supply constraints that prevented us from shipping even more,” Monde Nissin Chief Financial Officer Jesse C. Teo told a virtual news briefing last week. “We will try to address this quickly by building a new plant in Northern Luzon for our biscuit business.”

He said P6.6 billion will go to Monde Nissin’s Asia-Pacific business, while P976 million will go to its meat alternative business.

“The bulk of the P6.6 billion that we will be spending for capex in Asia-Pacific will go towards that,” he said, referring to the biscuit plant that he expects would widen their distribution network.

The company’s 2025 capex is 55% higher than a year earlier.

Monde Nissin expects the plant to generate more than P10 billion in sales once fully finished.

“However, we will be phasing it,” Mr. Teo said. “We need both capacity for Graham and SkyFlakes immediately, both for domestic and for international business, so we will prioritize that.”

Mr. Teo said Monde Nissin would also allot capex to cut losses in the company’s meat alternative business.

“We are thinking of infusing cash in order to bring down the borrowing at the meat alternative level to reduce the loss there and to help also the valuation,” he said.

Monde Nissin seeks to hit mid-single digit revenue growth for its Asia-Pacific business, while the profit margin would be “broadly in line” with last year, Monde Nissin Chief Executive Officer Henry Soesanto told the same briefing.

“For our meat alternative, we expect mid-single-digit core earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization in [million British pounds] for the year,” he added.

Monde Nissin swung to profitability with a P450-million net income last year from a P626.58-million net loss a year earlier as consolidated revenue rose 3.7% to P83.1 billion.

Sales of its Asia-Pacific business increased 5.4% to P69.5 billion, while revenue of its meat alternative segment dropped 4.5% to P13.59 billion.

Monde Nissin shares closed a centavo lower at P7 each on March 28. — Revin Mikhael D. Ochave

Driven to succeed

The Aeolus Mage and Dongfeng Nammi flank a parked small plane. — PHOTO BY DYLAN AFUANG

Dongfeng Motor Philippines reveals its market aspirations

By Dylan Afuang

UNDER THE DISTRIBUTORSHIP of Legado Motors, Inc. (LMI), Dongfeng Motor Philippines revealed its achievements and plans — detailing the rationale behind its “Drive Your Friend” marketing tagline in a recent media drive.

“We are using (Dongfeng’s) global tagline ‘Drive Your Dreams’ and ‘Drive Your Friend,’” LMI Sales Director Leah Avante shared to the media. “But in the Philippines, we (mostly) use ‘Drive Your Friend’ because we know that you use your vehicles (for) whatever trip that may be.”

Indeed, drive the media and content creators covering the automotive industry did, behind the wheel of the China-headquartered company’s offerings — enjoying attractions in Subic Bay, which included a luxury beach and golf club, and an airport. These vehicles are the Aeolus Huge Hybrid and Aeolus Mage Turbo crossovers, the Forthing Friday and Nammi battery electric vehicles, the Forthing U-Tour seven-seater, and Rich 7 pickup truck.

This event came after LMI, which began distributing the brand in late 2023, sold 300 Dongfeng cars in 2024, with the company planning to grow this figure to 2,000 units this year, the sales director said. More Dongfeng dealerships and models are eyed to be opened and launched to achieve that target, other LMI executives confirmed.

A majority of last year’s sales was accounted for by the Nanobox hatchback, Ms. Avante said. Priced at just P888,000, the Nanobox battery electric vehicle (BEV) is designed for urban use with its small size, maneuverability, and zero emissions. Sold alongside the EX-1 Pro (P838,000), these serve as the brand’s entry-level models.

“Aside from the target that was given to us by China (headquarters), we are confident with the product lineup that we have now,” Ms. Avante said. “Our three product lines are BEV and HEV (hybrid electric vehicle), but with our ICE (internal combustion engine) models and adding more dealers, we might push that number.”

The Aeolus Mage and Huge, and Forthing U-Tour are also eyed to boost sales, the executive revealed.

Three more dealerships to complement Dongfeng Motor Philippines’ current network of nine dealerships are planned to be operational within the year, LMI President and CEO Wilbert A. Lim continued. These prospective outlets are set to bolster the brand’s presence outside Metro Manila, he added.

The nine local Dongfeng dealerships are currently located in Alabang, Muntinlupa; Caloocan; Marcos Highway; Marikina City; Pasig City; Bacoor, Cavite; Pampanga; Tarlac; and Davao, a release from LMI said.

After partnering with a community mall chain operator, LMI will also improve its after-sales service by establishing service centers on the mall chain operator’s property, according to LMI VP for Sales and Operations Giovanni Frias. The mall chain would soon have at least five service centers open, he claimed.

Dongfeng Motors Philippines plans to introduce to the market a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) in the third quarter of 2025, the sales VP announced.

Established in 1969 and headquartered in Wuhan, China, Dongfeng Motor Corp. features a product portfolio that encompasses commercial vehicles like trucks and buses, alongside passenger cars including sedans and SUVs. The company features sub-brands under the Aeolus, Forthing, and Voyah marques.

Since its establishment, “Dongfeng has partnered with (foreign car makers) so they can expand their skills in making vehicles,” Mr. Frias boasted. The brand has entered “strategic joint ventures” with Japanese makers Honda, Infiniti, and Nissan, and French marques Citroën, Renault, and Peugeot, an LMI release specified.

“The engineers and designers come from overseas, and we are proud to announce that one of the Dongfeng designers came from Mercedes-Benz,” the LMI VP divulged. “That’s why our (cars’) design and build quality are similar to what you can see from more expensive vehicles,” he concluded.

PLDT shares drop despite good news

STOCK PHOTO | Image by terimakasih0 from Pixabay

PLDT, Inc. shares fell 1.3% week on week to P1,284 each on Friday, as investors priced in expectations about a company plan to boost its customer base by distributing free subscriber identity module (SIM) cards in the countryside.

The stock fall was in line with the Philippine Stock Exchange Index’s (PSEi) 1.3% decline to 6,147.44 points on March 28 from a week earlier. The share has declined 0.8% this year.

The PLDT stock was the 13th most traded share on the stock exchange last week, with value turnover hitting P485.7 million covering 376,450 stocks.

The company last week said it would provide through its mobile arm Smart Communications, Inc. half-a-million free SIM cards to remote areas in the Philippines in support of a government initiative to boost mobile connectivity.

“PLDT’s initiative on SIM cards somehow brought optimism about an increase in its users, which offset the worries regarding industry competition,” Jeconiah S. Nicolas, a research analyst at First Resources Management and Securities, said in a Viber message.

“But the announcement by Converge ICT Solutions, Inc. of their partnership with Elon Musk’s Starlink has raised concerns about tightening competition in the telecommunication industry,” he added.

Converge said it estimates a 5% to 10% increase in enterprise revenue through its collaboration with Elon Musk’s Starlink. On Tuesday, the listed fiber-optic network operator announced its tie-up with Starlink to extend broadband access to remote areas, strengthening enterprise connectivity nationwide.

PLDT’s net income increased 21.4% to P32.3 billion in 2024 from a year earlier, while revenue rose 2.8% to P216.83 billion.

“For the first-quarter revenue, we expect PLDT to post P61.07 billion, and for the whole year, we expect it to record P227.9 billion,” Mr. Nicolas said.

He put the support level for the PLDT stock at P1,255 and resistance at P1,400.

Hastings Holdings, Inc., a unit of PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund subsidiary MediaQuest Holdings, Inc., has a majority stake in BusinessWorld through the Philippine Star Group, which it controls. — LOP

Analysts: US launcher transfer to boost Philippine defense, irk China

US DEFENSE SECRETARY PETE HEGSETH — REUTERS

By Adrian H. Halili, Reporter

THE DEPLOYMENT of the United States’ Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS) in the Philippines could improve military modernization efforts but may also provoke a military response from China, analysts said at the weekend.

US Defense Secretary Peter Brian Hegseth, who was in Manila last week, said that US armed forces would deploy NMESIS missile systems during the annual Balikatan (shoulder-to-shoulder) joint military exercises in April.

“This is a big leap in the AFP’s (Armed Forces of the Philippines) modernization efforts through military aid with the US,” Chester B. Cabalza, founding president of Manila-based think tank International Development and Security Cooperation, said in a Facebook Messenger chat.

The US will also deploy an anti-ship missile system and highly capable unmanned surface vehicles, which Mr. Hegseth said that the weapon systems will allow US and Philippine forces “to train together using advanced capabilities to defend the Philippines’ sovereignty.”

Mr. Cabalza likewise expects the system to boost the country’s land warfare and naval warfare capabilities.

The US Defense chief visited the Philippines on March 28 and 29, reaffirming the US’ commitment to uphold its defense treaties in a meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. and Defense Secretary Gilberto C. Teodoro, Jr.

The meeting also followed the start of the Salaknib joint military exercises that focus on territorial defense and commanding large-scale deployment of forces, which will run from March 24 to April 11.

About 5,000 soldiers from the Philippine Army and US Army Pacific will take part in warfighting and exchange of expertise in the first phase of this year’s Exercise Salaknib. A second phase is scheduled for later this year.

Rommel C. Banlaoi, president of the Philippine Society for International Security Studies, however, said that the deployment of the weapon systems will only deepen Manila’s reliance on the US defense.

“The deployment of NMESIS class missiles and Unmanned Surface Vessels to the Philippines can support US defense operations in Asia with the Philippines, as a military ally, joyriding on American defense. But it does not actually enhance the development of autonomous Philippine defense capabilities as those missiles remain under the control of the US,” Mr. Banloi said in a Viber message. According to Mr. Banlaoi the stationing of the missile system and unmanned naval vessels in the Philippines will only draw the ire of the Chinese government.

“The deployment would not deter but rather provoke China to harden its military activities in the South China Sea,” he added. “China has developed a counter-deterrence capability to deal with US military presence in the Philippines.”

Raphael J. Cortez, who teaches diplomacy at De La Salle-College of St. Benilde said the weapon’s deployment will be a catalyst for China to undertake more aggressive actions.

“With such deployment, we can expect that China’s strategies will be more robust and there’s a possibility that the counterpart of these missiles for them will also be deployed so as to deter both parties from actually utilizing it,” Mr. Cortez said via Facebook chat.

Manila and Beijing have repeatedly clashed in the South China Sea, with both sides accusing each other of raising tensions.

China claims more than 80% of the waterway. This was voided by a United Nations-backed tribunal based in The Hague in 2016 for being illegal.

The South China Sea is a vital waterway that sees more than $3 trillion worth of annual ship-borne commerce. Countries like Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam also claim parts of the sea.

Amid the increasing tensions with Beijing in the South China Sea, the Philippines has been seeking more foreign defense deals with countries like the US, Australia, Japan, and Canada.

Last year, the US extended $500 million in aid for the modernization of the AFP and Philippine Coast Guard. The US government had also exempted security assistance to the Philippines worth $336 million from its foreign aid freeze.

Agri trading center opens in Rosales, Pangasinan

ROSALES TOURISM FACEBOOK PAGE

THE Department of Agriculture (DA) has opened a P60-million agriculture trading center in Rosales, Pangasinan that will further integrate farmers into the supply chain for the government’s network of subsidized stores.

The Rosales Agricultural Trading Center, funded through the Enhanced KADIWA Inclusive Food Supply Chain Program, will also feature a training facility designed to introduce farmers to new technologies and agricultural entrepreneurship.

“This initiative will not only boost farmers’ productivity but also create new income opportunities and foster job creation throughout the supply chain in Rosales and surrounding areas,” Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel, Jr. said in a statement.

The trading center is built on an 8,000-square-meter lot donated by Rep. Robert Raymund Estrella. The project started in November 2023 and was developed in cooperation with the Rosales municipal government.

The trading hub will serve as a pilot for similar facilities that the Department of Agriculture plans to establish in other parts of Pangasinan.

Meanwhile, the DA said it also plans to build a solar-powered cold storage facility next to the Rosales trading hub, with the intent of extending the shelf life of fresh produce, particularly high-value crops.

There are also plans to construct a rice drying facility in Rosales, it added.

The DA said a mobile soil laboratory will be deployed to Pangasinan in July to test soil conditions.

“This initiative aims to determine the best use of the land and identify the necessary inputs to optimize farm yields and boost farmers’ incomes,” it said.

Farmers in the area are reporting challenges like access to credit, cost of farm inputs, and low selling prices, according to the DA.

“In addition, traders exploit the lack of an efficient marketing system, inadequate infrastructure, financial limitations, and inconsistent policies,” it noted.

Pangasinan is among the top 10 in rice production. — Kyle Aristophere T. Atienza

Congress puts DoF in a bind and having to dip into PhilHealth and GOCCs: The case of PDIC

(Part 1)

The well-publicized and livestreamed hearings in the Philippine Supreme Court about the constitutionality or legality of the Department of Finance (DoF) taking out P89 billion from the funds of PhilHealth (Philippine Health Insurance Corp.) put a spotlight on the special provision in the General Appropriations Act (GAA) of 2024 and the corresponding DoF Circular 003-2024. It was this “rider” in the GAA that Finance Secretary Ralph Recto invoked in saying that the DoF was just “following the law,” in contravention of explicit provisions of the Universal Health Care Act (R.A. 11223), especially Section 11, and the sin tax laws (R.A. 10351 and R.A. 11346).

This article discusses how a similar DoF action in taking out “excess funds” from GOCCs — in this case a much bigger amount, P107 billion, from the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of the PDIC (Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp.) — has a striking parallel to the PhilHealth case, and in my view followed a logic that appears to be just as indefensible.

PDIC charter RA 10846 mandates it to provide deposit insurance and ensure the stability and safety of the banking system.

The PDIC issue boils down to several key questions:

1. What level of deposit insurance fund is considered adequate and prudent? Part 1 of this article covers this question.

2. If the DIF is deemed more than adequate, does the National Government have a basis to take money from the DIF, over and above the dividends? Part 2 covers this question and the next question.

3. What is the money from the “excess funds” to be used for?

To answer the first question, a good framework is the research paper made by the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI) “Deposit Insurance Fund Target Ratio” published in July 2018.

The paper showed a survey of various jurisdictions, how they differ in their approaches to targeting an appropriate ratio of DIF to insurable deposits considering factors such as financial system structure and characteristics, the prudential regulation regime, legal framework, macroeconomic conditions, and availability of emergency funding and the state of accounting and disclosures. Table 1 shows the wide range of deposit insurance ratios (whether set by law or by the deposit insurance agency):

The Philippine ratio of insurance fund to insurable deposits of 5.5% to 8% is somewhere in between the highs of 10% for Montenegro, 8-10% for Jamaica and 8-9% for Kosovo to as low as 0.25% for Hong Kong, and 0.3% for Singapore which are both developed city jurisdictions.

The rest of our Asian neighbors appear to be on the low side with 0.5% for Brunei, 2% for Chinese-Taipei, 2.5% for Indonesia, a range of 0.6% to 0.9% for Malaysia, and 4% for Mongolia.

Is the Philippines banking system “overinsured”? At first glance, it is tempting to conclude from Table 1 that the Philippine deposit system has “overprovided” and therefore there is an excess. While the cross-country comparisons are informative, each DIA considered their respective macroeconomic conditions, financial system structures, and other relevant factors.

The bottom-line is that in the course of performing its mandate, PDIC clearly:

1. Adopted a deposit insurance ratio target which it considered appropriate.

2. Adopted a range target instead of a single point target.

As of year-end 2023 (PDIC 2023 annual report page 66), PDIC continued to adopt a fund target ratio of 5.5% to 8% as a measure of the capital adequacy of the DIF in relation to the estimated insured deposits in the banking system. The Deposit Insurance Target Ratio framework was drawn up by an expert engaged through the World Bank (source: PDIC annual report).

The ratio represents PDIC’s ability to cover risk and promptly respond to insurance calls to maintain depositor confidence. The lower limit of 5.5% covers the PDIC’s anticipated risks and unanticipated risks under normal circumstances. On the other hand, the upper limit of 8% covers the anticipated and unanticipated risks with consideration for any possible repercussion of contagion (systemic risks) in the banking system.

Key Point: From 2014 to 2023, the amount of insurance payments by PDIC has declined substantially from between P1 billion and P2 billion, to well below P1 billion from 2020 to 2023. The figures in Column G of Table 2 were provided by PDIC management, filling in the data gaps from annual reports. These numbers seem to suggest that the Reserve for Insurance Fund was more than adequate. It would be interesting to see if the PDIC has a board resolution that officially made that determination.

As Table 2 shows (using data from 2014 to 2023 annual reports), the PDIC committed to build up the ratio of Deposit Insurance Fund to Estimated Insurable Deposits (DIF/EID) from 5.3% in 2014 to 8.8% in 2023. The DIF has three components: a permanent insurance fund (constant amount of P3 million), reserves for insurance losses which constitute the bulk of the DIF, and retained earnings of PDIC. In sum, the DIF is also the total equity of PDIC.

The DIF/EID ratio of 5.5% to 8% is subject to periodic review after three years. A logical process would have started with such a review, which would have determined whether changing the target ratio is in order. There was no indication in the PDIC annual reports that such a review has taken place.

The transfer of P107 billion from PDIC represents a reduction in the DIF/EID ratio from 8.8% to the 5.5% ratio or where it was 10 years ago. This means three things:

1. There was a sudden realization (epiphany?) at the PDIC board (for a long time headed by the Secretary of Finance, but starting 2022 chaired by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor) that the extra buffer to cover for systemic or contagion risks — which was painstakingly built up over 10 years — is no longer needed. This seems counterintuitive to the perception that the global environment is becoming more complex and characterized by VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity). This reasoning also sounds very much like a post hoc rationalization of a fait accompli that the National Government/DoF simply needs the money.

2. The National Government took out much more than the usual dividends it previously received from PDIC. Prior to this large-scale transfer of P107 billion, the National Government simply received dividends from PDIC (Column M, Table 2) which actually exceeded 100% of net income during the Duterte years (Column N). To be fair, the dividend to net income ratio was below 100% during the Marcos Jr. years 2022 and 2023.

3. It cut down PDIC equity by one-third, from P310 billion to P203 billion. This is similar to the reduction in capital of Land Bank and Development Bank of the Philippines as a result of their equity contributions to Maharlika Fund.

(To be continued.)

 

Alexander C. Escucha is the president of the Institute for Development and Econometric Analysis, Inc., and chairman of the UP Visayas Foundation, Inc. He is a fellow of the Foundation for Economic Freedom and a past president of the Philippine Economic Society. He is an international resource director of The Asian Banker (Singapore).

alex.escucha@gmail.com

Batt wait, there’s more

Lexus RZ BEVs top off their batteries at Shell Recharge. — PHOTO BY KAP MACEDA AGUILA

Evolving considerations from the ICE age to BEV ascendancy

THERE WAS a time when the question, “What mileage do you get on your car?” would get you a reply of “xx kilometers per liter” or “xx miles per gallon.” These days, the answer could very well be 400 or even a thousand kilometers. That is because the growing interest in electrified vehicles (xEVs) is shifting the conversation from efficiency to range.

In the glory days of the internal combustion engine (ICE), terms such as “gas guzzler” or “gas miser” were common labels attached to vehicles. High-performance cars would normally be categorized in the former and smaller cars in the latter. Big-sized engines with more than the usual four cylinders were known to guzzle fuel and, conversely, small-displacement motors were miserly in their consumption of gasoline.

Driving habits were also associated with how much or how little your fuel consumption would be. The lead-footed drivers — those who often stepped on the gas pedal with much gusto — would empty their fuel tanks much faster than their feather-footed brethren. Drivers would learn to “free-wheel” (the act of shifting to neutral and letting the car’s inertia propel itself) even for a few meters to save a little on gasoline. Some drivers would even turn the engine off to avoid idling — and the consumption of gas — while waiting for the light to turn green.

Yes, those were my days. They were about consuming less gas — or diesel — in order to save money at the pump and, for the early generation of green warriors, reduce the environmental impact of vehicles. The opposite, of course, was that you stepped on the throttle more vigorously to get more driving thrills and feels. I recall that getting 10kpl or better was already some kind of badge of honor, with most cars averaging in the mid-to-high single digits.

Fast-forward to today where electrified vehicles are upending conventional wisdom about what matters in a car. These days, it’s not how much gasoline you consume but what powers your vehicle that counts more. Are you running on fossil fuel, battery, or a combination thereof? Petrol is increasingly being taken out of the equation — and the conversation. It’s getting less about what fuels your car and more about what powers it. Nickel-hydride batteries? Lithium batteries? Solid-state batteries? Fuel cells? Hydrogen? Batteries are the new propellants.

And, by the way, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) no longer have fuel tanks and engines; they have motors, inverters and, of course, batteries — the three essential components of a BEV. Has the car now truly transformed into an appliance? It used to be that ICE cars were issued fuel efficiency ratings that were displayed on vehicles to inform buyers. Perhaps, these will be replaced soon by energy-efficiency ratings like those found on air-conditioners or refrigerators.

Conversations involving EVs inevitably revolve around range. How far can one go on a fully charged battery? What’s the fuel consumption of a particular ICE car? Occasionally, you might get asked, “How big is your fuel tank?” The answer, multiplied by efficiency, will give you range. In BEVs, I guess, the equivalent question would be, “How big is your battery capacity?” The bigger your battery and the fuller it is charged means you can cover more miles. This is the crux of ambivalence among car buyers, when mulling over remaining with an ICE vehicle or making the switch to a BEV.

For one, BEVs still give potential buyers range anxiety. They worry over running out of power while on the road. I would liken this to the “low batt” syndrome that mobile phone users dread. That’s why many carry their phone charger, a power bank, or a spare battery with them. I suppose this could be done for BEVs as well, but it would bring many times more the inconvenience that mobile phone users have to deal with. In fact, I would be so bold to say that most of the range apprehensions for BEVs stem from people’s personal mobile phone experience.

Range is such a critical consideration because the recharging infrastructure for EVs is still in its infancy. Thanks to private-sector proponents like the Ayala Group, the number of charging stations is growing at a rapid clip — albeit mostly in the metro area as yet. If the charging network becomes as vast as that of petrol stations, concerns about range anxiety would be rendered moot, as in the case of ICE cars. In fact, I remember a time when some off-roaders would carry a spare container of fuel in case they run out of gas before they could get a refill. That is why it is just as important for BEV users to map out through mobile apps where the closest or next charging station is located.

In order to go farther on a tank of gas, you have to drive efficiently — shifting gears properly, accelerating smoothly, braking gently, and attacking curves efficiently. In BEVs, going farther on a fully charged battery depends on, quite literally, the amount of electric power you consume as you drive. Braking a lot, would you believe, is a good thing because it creates regenerative power that helps charge batteries as you drive. And, by the way, no power is consumed while idling. On the other hand, how hard you accelerate still increases consumption. So do topography and ambient conditions. However, BEVs are particularly sensitive to inclines and extreme temperatures.

Other growing pains for xEVs — particularly BEVs — are getting car financing, as well as insurance, for these vehicles. At the heart of the matter is that there is not enough experience or data yet in the Philippines to determine the residual value (in the case of financing) and the claims cost (in the case of insurance) for them. Surely, this is an evolving situation that will solve itself over time.

Whatever you decide, the important thing is that your car delivers on your needs. In terms of your use, it should get you to places reliably, and it should allow you to have fun getting there. Of course, it should also make your ownership experience seamless and painless. It used to be that the onomatopoeic “vroom-vroom” would immediately evoke a thrilling drive. With BEVs being as quiet as they are, what could possibly characterize their appeal?

Miss Universe designs furniture line

CATRIONA GRAY poses with the Mayon chair and one of the Beh and She tables.

MISS UNIVERSE 2018 Catriona Gray, whose roots are in both the Philippines and Australia, has designed a furniture line in collaboration with local brand Genteelhome.

In a press conference on March 21 at the brand’s branch in the Podium in the Ortigas Center (it has three: that one, one in La Union, then its home branch in Pampanga), the brand showed off Ms. Gray’s collection, named “Payak” (“simple” in Filipino).

There are five pieces in the collection: the Mayon Lounge Chair, the Pinay Accent Chair, the Balik Tanaw Side Table, the Beh and She Side Tables, and the Kapit-Bisig shelf. They are made of teak wood, while the ropes used are made of lampakanay (cattail), as well as a fabric meant for outdoor furniture. While the pieces can be used indoors, they are tough enough to be used outside.

The Mayon chair in pink and orange is inspired by the Mayon Volcano, while its curved shape recalls the flow of lava. Ms. Gray won the Miss Universe pageant in 2018 wearing a gown centered around the same themes — that, and her mother hails from Bicol where the volcano is found.

The Pinay accent chair, meanwhile, takes inspiration from the baro’t saya traditional dress. The Balik Tanaw side table appears like a frame, recalling a swatch of inabel* fabric a gift she received from National Living Treasure Magdalena Gamayo, that Ms. Gray wanted framed.

The Beh and She tables (say the name together and you get beshie, slang for “best friend”), according to Ms. Gray, have bangles attached to them due to her own fondness for the bangles worn by the T’boli people.

Finally, the Kapit-Bisig shelf integrates colored abaca weaving as a nod to generations of Filipina weavers.

“Furniture naman (this time). It really makes sense,” she said, mentioning that she had a hand in designing the jewelry she wore during her Miss Universe win. “Every detail has intention behind it.”

“The whole collection is payak, but for me, it represents slow living — slowing down, having intentional time, with intentional pieces,” she said during the press conference.

“I hope these pieces find a way to help express your most authentic and relaxed self at home,” she added.

According to her, a portion of the proceeds from this collaboration will go to her favorite charities (Ms. Gray has been involved with causes relating to children, as well as HIV or human immunodeficiency virus awareness). “I will be giving some of the proceeds to my charity of choice — still finalizing which one that will be. It’s important for me to give back. This effort, all this collaboration wasn’t about earning. For me, it’s really an expression of my creativity,” she said.

“I have pride in my heart knowing that these pieces are really benefitting the livelihood of Capampangans who are making this lovingly by hand,” she added.

Speaking about what home means for her, she said: “I feel like a home for anyone should be an escape from the hustle and bustle of the world. It should be a space where you can come back and feel just like yourself… you can just be you.”

For more information about the collection, visit www.genteelhome.ph. — Joseph L. Garcia

*Inabel is a handwoven cotton fabric from the Ilocos region.

PT&T may return to stock market this year

PTT.COM.PH

PT&T CORP. is about to complete the requirements for its return to trading at the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) this year, according to its top official.

“We are on track,” PT&T President and Chief Executive Officer James G. Velasquez told reporters on the sidelines of an event last week. “The plan is to be able to do that within the year. So, hopefully within the first half is our objective.”

Toby Allan C. Arce, head of sales trading at Globalinks Securities and Stocks, Inc., said the company’s plan to resume trading at the PSE aligns with market trends.

“If the broader economic and stock market conditions in 2025 improve, it could create a conducive environment for PT&T’s reentry,” he said in a Viber message on Sunday. “However, uncertainty due to global economic headwinds remains a risk.”

Mr. Velasquez said the company is in the process of meeting the requirements and regulatory approvals for the plan.

“There are still a few things that we need to complete,” he said. “But I would say 90% of what we need to do has been completed. So we’re at the tail end of that.”

Mr. Arce said PT&T’s reentry this year is strategic given the digital transformation and expansion of telecommunications and broadband services.

“This is assuming the industry’s robust growth continues,” he said. “Meeting all Philippine Stock Exchange requirements will likely boost investor confidence in the company’s governance and compliance standards.”

Increasing demand for high-speed internet and digital connectivity especially in underserved areas might position PT&T as a key player, Mr. Arce said.

“Supportive government initiatives for digital infrastructure could catalyze growth for PT&T,” he said. “The company’s ability to communicate its turnaround story effectively will be critical in influencing market reception.”

Incorporated in 1962, PT&T is a diversified company that caters to corporate, small and medium businesses and residential segments.

The company was listed in 1990 but requested a voluntary trading suspension in December 2004 after failing to meet the local bourse’s reportorial requirements and as the company faced financial challenges.

Last year, PT&T said it was actively pursuing its return to the market after recording strong performance in 2023.

The Securities and Exchange Commission in November 2023 approved an increase in PT&T’s authorized capital stock to P12.6 billion from P3.8 billion, allowing it to facilitate a debt-to-equity conversion of P8.9 billion, according to its website.

Last week, SecureLink Networks, Inc., the joint venture between PT&T and Australia’s Netlinkz Ltd., announced its plan to establish a multimillion-dollar tech facility in the Philippines to enhance the country’s connectivity and cybersecurity. — Ashley Erika O. Jose

India offers US tariff cuts on farm imports

REUTERS

NEW DELHI — India has offered tariff cuts on imports of US farm products like almonds and cranberries as a further concession to the US, two government sources said, hoping to avert President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs set for next week.

Unlike China, Canada and the European Union, India is actively seeking to appease the Trump administration and is open to cutting tariffs on over half of US imports worth $23 billion, Reuters reported earlier this week.

In a series of meeting in New Delhi with Brendan Lynch, the assistant US trade representative for South and Central Asia, India agreed to cut tariffs on bourbon whiskey and agricultural products such as almonds, walnuts, cranberries, pistachios and lentils, one of the sources familiar with discussions said.

Trade talks are “progressing well” and the bilateral trade pact, still in progress, will benefit both nations, Indian Trade Minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday.

“Securing a favorable deal is a priority for Indian negotiators,” a second government source said, adding that India has aligned its offers with US priorities, particularly in the agriculture industry and some other sectors.

Both sources spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks.

India’s trade ministry didn’t respond to e-mail request for comment, while the US embassy spokesperson in New Delhi said: “We don’t have anything to share on private diplomatic discussions.”

India lowered duties for bourbon whiskey to 100% from 150% last month. Import duties range from 30% to 100% on agricultural products like cranberries, almonds, walnuts, and around 10% on lentils.

However, there is still resistance in government circles to lowering tariffs for dairy products, rice, wheat and maize, the source said, adding India is seeking greater market access for shipments of fruits like pomegranates and grapes to the US market.

The negotiators are expected to agree on the framework for the broad contours of the first phase of the bilateral deal, expected to be signed by fall 2025, the sources said.

In 2024, exports of US agriculture and allied products to India totaled nearly $2 billion, including $452 million in alcoholic beverages and $1.3 billion in fruits and vegetables while India’s exports to the US stood at about $5.5 billion. — Reuters

T-bill, bond rates may end mixed before inflation data

BW FILE PHOTO

RATES of the Treasury bills (T-bills) and Treasury bonds (T-bonds) to be auctioned off this week could track secondary market yields before the release of March inflation data, which could affect the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ (BSP) policy decision next month.

The Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) will auction off P25 billion in T-bills on Monday, or P8 billion each in 91- and 182-day papers and P9 billion in 364-day papers.

On Wednesday, the government will offer P30 billion in reissued seven-year T-bonds with a remaining life of five years and three months. This week’s T-bond auction was moved from the usual Tuesday schedule due to the Eid’l Fitr holiday.

Rates of the government securities on offer this week could mirror the mixed yield movements at the secondary market last week, Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. Chief Economist Michael L. Ricafort said in a Viber message.

At the secondary market on Friday, the 91-, 182-, and 364-day T-bills rose by 12.09 basis points (bps), 9.05 bps, and 8.86 bps week on week to end at 5.2978%, 5.6163% and 5.7763%, respectively, based on PHP Bloomberg Valuation Service Reference Rates data as of March 28 published on the Philippine Dealing System’s website.

Meanwhile, the seven-year bond’s rate went down by 6.3 bps week on week to close at 6.0353%. The five-year debt, the benchmark tenor closest to the remaining life of the papers on offer on Wednesday, also declined by 6.3 bps week on week to yield 5.9001%.

Yields at the secondary market ended mixed amid expectations of a BSP rate cut as early as next month, Mr. Ricafort said.

The market is awaiting the release of the March inflation report as this could dictate the central bank’s next move, he added.

BSP Governor Eli M. Remolona, Jr. last week said that there is a “good chance” that the Monetary Board will cut rates by 25 bps at their April 10 meeting, Bloomberg reported.

Mr. Remolona said the BSP remains on an easing cycle and could reduce borrowing costs by as much as 75 bps this year depending on data.

The central bank has brought down benchmark interest rates by a total of 75 bps since it began its rate-cut cycle in August last year, with its policy rate currently at 5.75%.

The Monetary Board in February unexpectedly kept rates unchanged amid uncertainties stemming from the Trump administration’s policies.

The Philippine Statistics Authority will release March consumer price index (CPI) data on April 4 (Friday).

Headline inflation may have eased slightly in March amid lower prices, analysts said. A BusinessWorld poll of 18 analysts yielded a median estimate of 2% for the March CPI.

If realized, this would be a tad slower than the 2.1% in February and the 3.7% clip in the same month a year ago. This would also be the lowest monthly inflation in six months or since the 1.9% print in September.

Mr. Ricafort added that secondary market yields last week were also affected by the latest cut in banks’ reserve requirement ratios, which took effect on Friday and infused about P330 billion into the financial system. Traders said the excess liquidity was mostly placed in debt instruments at the front end of the curve.

Last week, the BTr raised P28 billion from the T-bills it auctioned off, higher than the original P22-billion plan, as total bids reached P67.88 billion, more than twice as much as the amount on offer.

Broken down, the Treasury borrowed P7 billion as planned via the 91-day T-bills as tenders for the tenor reached P18.825 billion. The three-month paper was quoted at an average rate of 5.157%, rising by 3.9 bps from the previous auction. Tenders accepted by the BTr carried yields of 5.14% to 5.179%.

Meanwhile, the government made a P9.8-billion award of the 182-day securities, above the P7-billion program, as bids for the paper amounted to P19.925 billion. The average rate of the six-month T-bill was at 5.554%, 5.8 bps higher than the previous week, with accepted rates ranging from 5.488% to 5.599%.

Lastly, the Treasury raised P11.2 billion via the 364-day debt papers, more than the P8 billion placed on the auction block, as demand for the tenor totaled P29.13 billion. The average rate of the one-year debt inched down by 1.6 bps to 5.681%, with bids accepted having yields of 5.673% to 5.697%.

Meanwhile, the T-bonds on offer on Wednesday were last auctioned off on March 4, where the government raised P30 billion as planned at an average rate of 6.019%, lower than the 6.375% coupon.

The Treasury is looking to raise P245 billion from the domestic market this month, or P125 billion via T-bills and P120 billion through T-bonds.

The government borrows from local and foreign sources to help fund its budget deficit, which is capped at P1.54 trillion or 5.3% of gross domestic product this year. — A.M.C. Sy

Honoring Enrico P. Villanueva

CEM.UPLB.EDU.PH

It was Feb. 25, the second day of the Supreme Court (SC) oral arguments for the petitions against the PhilHealth fund transfer, when Rico Villanueva left this earth for good.

It is almost poetic — tragic, even — that on a day meant for defending the Filipino people’s right to health, we lost someone who stood for what is right and championed the cause of protecting PhilHealth (Philippine Health Insurance Corp.) funds from predation.

Rico, a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Economics of the University of the Philippines Los Baños (DE-UPLB), was among the voices of dissent against the PhilHealth fund transfer. He became an important figure in igniting the discourse on the fiscal and actuarial aspects of the issue. He shared his well-founded criticisms and financial analysis of the issue on social media (X and Facebook) where he had amassed influence as a respected monetary and fiscal expert.

The first time that civil society advocates consulted him about the PhilHealth issue, we were at his office in UPLB, and he was clearly exhausted from a long day of lectures. Despite this, Rico was accommodating and generous in sharing his insights into PhilHealth’s financial position. He even shared his frustration that no one seemed to point out the true financial situation of PhilHealth — one that stands in stark contrast to the claims of the state health insurer having “excess” funds.

On Oct. 29, 2024, we formally visited the Department of Economics in UPLB. It was a few days after Tropical Storm Kristine ravaged Luzon, and the campus was still bearing signs of the aftermath. Trees had been uprooted and branches piled along the roadside. Despite the chaos, the DE–UPLB warmly welcomed us as we sought help to understand the financial situation of PhilHealth.

During this visit, Rico explained the true financial situation of PhilHealth, noting that the claims of the Department of Finance Secretary Ralph Recto overestimated (or exaggerated) the state health insurer’s funds, and ignored its outstanding obligations to all its members of P1.163 trillion in insurance contract liabilities (ICL). Given this obligation, PhilHealth faces a deficit of P644 billion — a dire fiscal situation that was further exacerbated by the government’s order of transferring P89.9 billion of PhilHealth funds to the National Treasury.

Of this amount, P60 billion was already transferred before a temporary restraining order was released by the Supreme Court on that very same day, Oct. 29, about two hours after our meeting with Rico.

In a small open space beside the DE function room where we held our meeting, stacks of bond paper were spread out on the thin grass, left to dry under the sun. It was sort of a reminder that something the storm tried to drench and damage can still be reclaimed; we just have to expose it to the light.

And so we did.

After that meeting, efforts to enlighten the public about the true financial situation of PhilHealth began. Rico wrote a pivotal piece for AER’s Yellow Pad entitled “State of the PhilHealth fund: Claimed excess ignores reserve deficit and service gaps.” (See BusinessWorld, Nov. 4, 2024.). The article was widely shared. It debunked claims of “excess funds,” helping the public better understand the real financial state of PhilHealth and fueling wider opposition to the transfer of PhilHealth funds.

Rico also created a short video to explain the issue in a simpler, less technical way.

Now, the public is very aware of the issue. The public rejects the actions of the National Government of taking away PhilHealth funds, which is contrary to law. This issue is highlighted in the oral arguments at the Supreme Court. Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier emphasized that the state health insurer is essentially on the brink of bankruptcy, given that for the past three years, its reserve funds have been significantly lower than actuarial estimates. The PhilHealth reserve fund, which Secretary Recto claims to be more than sufficient to provide benefit packages to members and their dependents, was found to be critically short of covering the insurer’s total obligations.

Rico taught us, and his students, to make use of and critically analyze government reports. “Actually, I’m just using PhilHealth data,” Rico told us about his findings. He keenly analyzed data and made technical and complex economic and financial topics easy to understand for the public.

Even with the gap in the provision of ICL out of the picture, the figures cited by Secretary Recto and President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos, Jr. in their statements on the funds available at PhilHealth’s disposal will not be sufficient to sustain the complete rollout of crucial PhilHealth benefit packages for all Filipinos. For one, based on our calculation, the outpatient Konsulta package alone will cost at least P194 billion per year to cover the entire population, not to mention the infrastructure that needs to be in place to effectively implement this package, including health information technology. In addition, the 2023 benefit payments of PhilHealth revealed its failure to sufficiently fund the full-service coverage of benefits that contribute to the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For instance, PhilHealth covered only half of the benefits for pregnant women and a small proportion of TB patients.

Rico also lambasted the role of the DoF in the fund transfer. The DoF created a circular to implement the special provision of the 2024 General Appropriations Act calling for collection of government-owned and -controlled corporation (GOCC) funds in excess of reserves. Wrote Rico in his Yellow Pad article, “the DoF appointed itself via circular as the calculator of reserve funds, which is a case of conflict of interest. The DoF cannot be both the arbiter of excess reserves and beneficiary of collected funds. The calculation of reserves is the job of the Actuary who ideally should be independent.”

Rico was an influencer, a leader, and a mentor. His memorial service was attended by diverse sectors — bankers, professors, students, triathletes, and others — sharing stories of how Rico had touched their lives. Sorrow quietly turned into a celebration as those who loved him found comfort in knowing that, despite his abrupt passing, Rico lived a full life.

Among his many roles, we at AER remember Rico as an intellectual with unwavering commitment to serving the people. His legacy is using his expertise in finance and economics to champion controversial causes that truly matter to Philippine society — an embodiment of honor, excellence, and service to the people.

We look back at a post he shared on his X account regarding the PhilHealth case: “I hope accountants, actuaries, and health economists will speak up. Please amplify the truth.”

We at AER sincerely hope and pray that Rico’s pursuit of the truth will prevail. While he may not witness the SC’s decision on the case, the impact of his contributions to the discourse and the young minds he has influenced is a victory in itself.

 

Rosheic Sims and Dhelyn Dela Cruz are researchers for Action for Economic Reforms’ health and fiscal policy team.

1...1,7801,7811,782...14,236Page 1,781 of 14,236
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 BusinessWorld Publishing.
All rights reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines
Facebook Instagram Linkedin X Youtube