Business groups weigh in on charter change
By Minde Nyl R. dela Cruz
THE SENATE is looking to invite business groups Makati Business Club (MBC), Management Association of the Philippines (MAP), and the Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines (FINEX) in its next hearing on charter change following a joint statement recommending a focus on amending the economic provisions of the 1987 Constitution.
“We welcome their inputs, especially on [separate voting and constitutional convention]. The Senate committee on constitutional amendments would invite them in the next hearings,” Senator Francis N. Pangilinan, chair of the Senate committee on constitutional amendments and revision of codes, said in a text message to the BusinessWorld.
In a joint statement issued on Sunday, Jan. 21, the business groups called for separate voting of the two chambers of Congress as being “more democratic.” They also urged the holding of a constitutional convention as “the appropriate body to amend the Constitution.”
The business groups also expressed “strong support” for Resolution of Both Houses (RBH) No. 2, as filed by former House Speaker and Quezon City Representative Feliciano R. Belmonte, Jr. That resolution, from way back the 16th Congress, proposes the lifting of economic restrictions by inserting the phrase “unless otherwise provided by law” in the 1987 Constitution.
RBH No. 2, however, is also adopted by the much more recent House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) No. 9 which the House of Representatives approved last Tuesday, Jan. 16. HCR No. 9 calls on Congress to be convened into a constituent assembly, ahead of provisions being crafted on the watch of the House committee on constitutional amendments that aim to overhaul the present system of government into a federal structure.
The business groups, for their part, noted that amending the economic provisions “would allow Congress to pass future laws to change the current Constitutional restrictions.”
“The Philippines’ population has more than doubled since 1987. Government should maximize the amount of foreign investment generated as a means to drive down unemployment and underemployment levels. While there has been a very significant increase in FDI since 2010, amounting to over $8 billion in 2016 and the same level forecasted in 2017, this represents only 8% of total FDI in ASEAN, which is small, considering that the Philippines accounts for 16% of the population of ASEAN,” the joint statement in part reads.
The businessmen added that removal of the economic restrictions “would mean a fresh infusion of financial resources for our undercapitalized sectors, the introduction of new technologies to spur greater innovation and efficiency in our industries, and the promotion of healthy competition that will drive businesses to operate more efficiently, leading to better-quality and more competitively priced products and services for the people.”
MBC, MAP, and FINEX said “there is no better time than now to begin the process of updating the outdated economic restrictions in our Constitution,” and stressed that “it will be unfortunate if the Philippines fails to take advantage of this golden opportunity.”
The businessmen further stated that a separate voting of the two chambers of Congress will “avoid diluting the voice of our Senators in this critical process,” and added that a Con-con will “offer a more diverse, independent, and prospective approach.”
“While such mode would entail greater costs to implement and probably more time, it should be seen as a justifiable investment that will result (in) significant social returns in the long run,” the group stated.
House Speaker Pantaleon D. Alvarez has been pushing for joint voting in amending the Charter by the Senate and the House as a constituent assembly. The Senate, on the other hand, maintains its position on separate voting, and thus the matter of Congress convening as a constituent assembly has reached a deadlock.
BUDGET REFORM
For his part, Senator Panfilo M. Lacson said he plans to revive a bill he filed in 2016 called the “Budget Reform Advocacy for Village Empowerment (BRAVE).”
“Now I’m thinking of reviving it and reporting it out on the floor so that we can have an alternative in case, for example, disagreements continue regarding discussions on (charter change) paving the way for federalism. This is the best alternative method or means to spread out development in many areas of our country,” Mr. Lacson said in Filipino in a radio interview Sunday.
This would, in part, address the matter of local government leaders flocking to Congress during budget deliberations to ask funds for their projects, he added.
“The proposal aims to assign funds to all provinces, municipalities, cities, and barangays from the national budget. It would allocate P5 million per barangay, P100 million per municipality, and P1 billion each for all the 81 provinces. But these funds would only be used for development, livelihood and infrastructure, and not for MOOE (Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses) because it might be abused. Development will then spread,” Mr. Lacson also said.
The senator said he had presented this proposal to Cabinet Secretary Leoncio B. Evasco, Jr.
“He (Mr. Evasco) said after my presentation, ‘If the President sees this, he will forget federalism because this is his goal,’” Mr. Lacson said.
The senator also noted that his budget reform bill does not yet have a counterpart bill in the House of Representatives. — with Camille A. Aguinaldo