Pop star Taylor Swift backs Harris in boost to campaign

PHILADELPHIA — Democratic candidate Kamala Harris put her Republican rival Donald Trump on the defensive in a combative presidential debate on Tuesday with a stream of attacks on his fitness for office, his support of abortion restrictions and his myriad legal woes.

A former prosecutor, Ms. Harris, 59, controlled the debate from the start, getting under her rival’s skin repeatedly and prompting a visibly angry Mr. Trump, 78, to deliver a series of falsehood-filled retorts.

At one point, she goaded the former president by saying that people often leave his campaign rallies early “out of exhaustion and boredom.”

Mr. Trump, who has been frustrated by the size of Ms. Harris’ own crowds, said, “My rallies, we have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics.”

He then pivoted to a false claim about immigrants eating pets in Springfield, Ohio, that has circulated on social media and was amplified by Mr. Trump’s vice-presidential candidate, Senator JD Vance.

“They’re eating the dogs!” he said, as Ms. Harris laughed in disbelief. “The people that came in, they’re eating the cats! They’re eating the pets of the people that live there.”

“Talk about extreme,” Ms. Harris replied.

With eight weeks to go before the election, and days until early voting starts in some states, the debate — the only one scheduled — offered a rare opportunity for both candidates to make their case for a television audience of tens of millions of voters.

The candidates clashed over immigration, foreign policy and healthcare, but the debate was light on specific policy details.

Instead, Ms. Harris’ forceful approach succeeded in putting the focus on Mr. Trump, leaving her allies jubilant and some Republicans acknowledging Mr. Trump’s struggles.

Mr. Trump repeated his false claim that his 2020 election defeat was due to fraud, called Ms. Harris a “Marxist” and asserted falsely that migrants have caused a violent crime spree.

“Trump missed an opportunity to stay focused prosecuting the case against Biden-Harris on the economy and border, and instead took her bait and chased down rabbit holes on election denialism and immigrants eating our pets,” said Marc Short, who served as chief of staff for Mr. Trump’s former Vice-President Mike Pence.

SWIFT ENDORSEMENT
In a boost to the Harris campaign, pop megastar Taylor Swift told her 283 million followers on Instagram immediately following the debate that she would back Vice-President Harris and her running mate Tim Walz in the Nov. 5 election.

She signed it “childless cat lady,” a reference to controversial remarks made by Mr. Vance.

Online prediction market PredictIt’s 2024 presidential general election market showed Mr. Trump’s likelihood of victory declining during the debate, to 47% from 52%. Ms. Harris’ odds improved to 55% from 53%.

In a sign of confidence in the debate’s outcome, Ms. Harris’ campaign challenged Mr. Trump to a second round in October.

Mr. Trump afterwards took the rare step of going into the nearby “spin room,” a job usually left to supporters, where he told reporters, “This was my best debate.”

Asked about the Harris campaign seeking a second debate, Mr. Trump told Fox News: “She wants it because she lost.”

“I have to think about it, but if you won the debate, I sort of think maybe I shouldn’t do it. Why should I do another debate?” he said.

Mr. Trump, who has spent weeks launching personal attacks on Ms. Harris including racist and sexist insults, largely avoided that pattern during the debate’s early moments but quickly became agitated under Ms. Harris’ offensive.

Mr. Trump was asked by the moderators about one of those attacks, when he told an event with Black journalists in July that Ms. Harris had recently “become a Black person.”

“I couldn’t care less,” he said. “Whatever she wants to be is OK with me.”

Ms. Harris, who has both Black and South Asian heritage, responded, “I think it’s a tragedy that we have someone who wants to be president who has consistently over the course of his career attempted to use race to divide the American people.”

She criticized Mr. Trump over his criminal conviction for covering up hush money payments to a porn star as well as his other indictments and a civil judgment finding him liable for sexual assault. Trump has denied wrongdoing and again accused Ms. Harris and the Democrats of orchestrating all of the cases without evidence.

The debate got under way at 9 p.m. ET (0100 GMT on Wednesday) with a surprise handshake between the two opponents, who had never met before. Ms. Harris approached Mr. Trump at his lectern, introducing herself by name, in what was the first handshake at a presidential debate since 2016.

The encounter was particularly important for Ms. Harris, with opinion polls showing that more than a quarter of likely voters feel they do not know enough about her. Harris entered the race only seven weeks ago after President Joseph Biden’s exit.

Ms. Harris delivered a lengthy attack on abortion limits, speaking passionately about women denied emergency care and victims of incest unable to terminate their pregnancies due to statewide bans that have proliferated since the US Supreme Court eliminated a nationwide right in 2022. Three Trump appointees were in the majority of that ruling.

She also claimed Mr. Trump would support a national ban. Mr. Trump called that assertion untrue but declined to say explicitly that he would veto such a law.

Mr. Trump, who has sometimes struggled with messaging on abortion, said falsely that Ms. Harris and Democrats support infanticide, which — as ABC News moderator Linsey Davis noted — is illegal in every state.

Ms. Harris also sought to tie Mr. Trump to Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint that proposes expanding executive power, eliminating environmental regulations and making it illegal to ship abortion pills across state lines, among other right-wing goals.

Mr. Trump retorted that he has “nothing to do” with Project 2025, though some of his advisers were involved in its creation.

Ron Bonjean, a Republican strategist, said Mr. Trump “didn’t do himself any favors” but added that it remains unclear whether Ms. Harris’ performance will change the race’s dynamics. Polls show a vast majority of Americans have made up their minds, leaving a small sliver of undecided voters up for grabs.

CLASHES ON ECONOMY, FOREIGN POLICY
The candidates opened the debate by focusing on the economy, an issue that opinion polls show favors Mr. Trump.

Ms. Harris attacked Mr. Trump’s intention to impose high tariffs on foreign goods — a proposal she has likened to a sales tax on the middle class — while touting her plan to offer tax benefits to families and small businesses.

Mr. Trump criticized Ms. Harris for the persistent inflation during the Biden administration’s term, though he overstated the level of price increases. Inflation, he said, “has been a disaster for people, for the middle class, for every class.”

The candidates also exchanged barbs over the Israel-Gaza war and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, though neither offered specifics on how they would seek to end each conflict.

Ms. Harris accused Mr. Trump of being willing to abandon US support for Ukraine to curry favor with Russian President Vladimir Putin, calling Mr. Trump a “disgrace,” while Mr. Trump claimed Ms. Harris “hates” Israel — an assertion she rejected.

Presidential debates do not necessarily change voters’ minds, but they can be deeply consequential. Mr. Biden’s poor performance against Mr. Trump in June led him to abandon his campaign on July 21.

In a contest that could again come down to tens of thousands of votes in a handful of states, even a small shift in public opinion could alter the outcome. The two candidates are effectively tied in the seven battleground states likely to decide the election, according to polling averages compiled by the New York Times. — Reuters

RIIHIMAKI, Finland — This autumn, pupils in the Finnish town of Riihimaki headed back to school with backpacks full of books after a decade of state-backed promotion of laptops and other digital devices in the classroom.

Finland’s public education system has gained global renown for its good results in recent decades and its readiness to try new teaching techniques. Until recently, many schools gave laptops for free to all pupils from as early as age 11.

But Finnish parents and teachers, as elsewhere, have become increasingly concerned over the impact of screens on children.

So Riihimaki, a town of some 30,000 inhabitants 70 km (44 mi) north of Helsinki which since 2018 had stopped using most books in middle schools, is trying something different for the start of this academic year: going back to pen and paper.

“Young people are using phones and digital devices so much these days that we didn’t want school to be one of the places where children are only staring at screens,” said Maija Kaunonen, an English teacher at Pohjolanrinne middle school.

The constant distractions that come with the use of digital devices make many children restless and too flighty to focus.

“Most students just did the exercises as quick as they could so they could then move on to playing games and chatting on social media,” she told Reuters during a break in class.

“And it took them no time at all to change tabs in the browser. So when the teacher came round to them, they could say: ‘Yes, I was doing this exercise’.”

Across Finland, children’s learning results have been slowly eroding in recent years, prompting the government to plan new legislation to ban the use of personal devices, such as phones, during school hours to cut back on children’s screen time.

IMPROVED CONCENTRATION
One of Kaunonen’s pupils, Elle Sokka, 14, said she did not always focus on the school subjects when learning digitally.

“Sometimes I would drift off to different websites,” she said.

Eighth graders Miko Mantila and Inka Warro, both 14, said their concentration has improved since books came back.

“Reading, for one, is much easier and I can read much faster from books,” Mantila said, though he added that writing was easier on a digital device.

“And if you have to do homework late at night, it’s easier to go to sleep when you haven’t just been looking at a device,” Warro said.

Minna Peltopuro, a clinical neuropsychologist working with the town on the change, said the total screen time should be cut to a minimum — Finnish teenagers currently stare at screen for up to six hours per day on average — as excessive digital use comes with both physical and mental risks, such as eye problems and growing anxiety.

“Another one is multi-tasking,” she said. “The brain is very vulnerable to multi-tasking and especially at a young age one cannot manage it well.” — Reuters

DUBLIN — A European Union (EU) court order that Apple pay Ireland 13 billion euros ($14.4 billion) in back taxes triggered mixed feelings in Dublin on Tuesday as the government assessed possible reputational damage and rebuffed opposition calls for the cash to be spent quickly.

Ireland had fought the EU back-tax bill alongside Apple since 2016, seeking to defend its position as the location of choice for U.S. multinationals in Europe — and the billions of euros in direct and indirect taxes they bring in each year.

The government played down the finding by the Court of Justice of the European Union that it granted the iPhone maker unlawful aid through its tax treatment as an issue “of historical relevance only” due to changes in tax rules since.

But it reluctantly accepted that it must now take the back taxes held in an escrow fund estimated at 13.8 billion euros.

Finance Minister Jack Chambers said ministers would “carefully consider” in the coming weeks how best to use the money but that it would not be added to next month’s budget pot.

Opposition parties, who have criticized the government’s decision in 2016 to join Apple in appealing the ruling, repeated calls for the windfall to be used quickly to fix a housing crisis and help fund stretched services like healthcare.

“If they (the government) had their way, the taxpayer would be down more than 13 billion euros… The mind boggles,” Mary Lou McDonald, leader of the main opposition Sinn Fein party, told reporters.

The government has already set out plans to cut taxes and hike spending in an 8.3 billion euro pre-election Oct. 1 budget, to the extent that it will break its own fiscal rule, meant to cap spending growth at 5%.

Ireland is already taking in more tax than it can spend — primarily due to surging corporate tax receipts paid by foreign companies like Apple — and has set up a new sovereign wealth fund it hopes to grow to 100 billion euros by 2035.

It expects to take in 24.5 billion euros in corporate tax this year, mainly from big foreign multinationals, and had collected significantly more than expected by the end of August.

Spending Minister Paschal Donohoe said increasing spending any further now risked stoking inflation again just as it has stabilized at around 1%.

Other EU countries might also lay claim to part of the funds following Tuesday’s final ruling in the antitrust case, although Chambers said it was not yet possible to comment on whether they would do so.

REPUTATIONAL DAMAGE
Foreign multinationals, attracted in large part due to low tax rates, make up around 11% of the entire labour market in Ireland — twice the workforce they had when the Apple controversy broke in 2013.

Peter Vale, tax partner at Grant Thornton, said Tuesday’s ruling might do temporary damage to Ireland’s reputation but was unlikely to impact foreign direct investment.

“While it does relate to a bygone era, even last week, (ex-US President Donald) Trump accused Ireland of being a tax haven,” Vale said. “We’ll vigorously defend that, but it only adds further fuel to the fire to those sort of assertions.”

Since the EU order in 2016, Ireland has made a number of changes to its corporate tax code and did the once unthinkable by dropping opposition to giving up its prized 12.5% corporate tax rate as part of an overhaul of global tax rules. — Reuters