Home Blog Page 5814

67% of Baguio’s lodging businesses still closed 

@BAGUIOTOURISM

MAJORITY of accommodation establishments in Baguio have yet to resume operations despite the city’s recent reopening to tourists. 

Tourism Operations Officer Aloysius C. Mapalo, in a press release Monday, said more than 800 lodgings, or about 67% of the 1,200 total registered pre-pandemic, are still closed as leisure travelers allowed to enter the city remains limited.   

He said most of these businesses are small-scale accommodations.   

“With the recent re-opening of the city to tourists… the local government is hopeful that the accommodation establishments that are not yet operational will be able to gradually and safely resume their operations with the expected influx of visitors even if the number of travelers to the city is currently being limited to around 2,000 daily,” Mr. Mapalo said.  

Those planning to go to Baguio must pre-register through visita.baguio.gov.ph. Fully-vaccinated guests are no longer required to submit a negative coronavirus test result.   

All visitors are still required to go through the central triage area at the Baguio Convention Center for checking of documents.  

Mr. Mapalo said three hotels — Baguio Country Club, Camp John Hay Manor, and Forest Lodge — have also been accredited by the local government to conduct triaging for their respective guests.  

Senate approves bill providing protection to judiciary officials, members 

THE SENATE on Monday passed on third and final reading a bill that will create a security force that will protect judiciary officials and other members.  

Senator Richard J. Gordon, Sr., primary sponsor of the bill, cited in a statement that 157 lawyers, judges, and court personnel were killed from 2016 to July 2021 under the administration of President Rodrigo R. Duterte.  

Senate Bill 1947 or An Act Creating the Office of the Judiciary Marshals was passed with 21 affirmative votes and one abstention from Senator Ronald M. Dela Rosa.   

The former police officer previously cited possible constitutional issues on the overlapping of functions between and among law enforcement agencies, as the proposed measure grants investigative powers to the office. In response, Mr. Gordon assured that the scope of investigations will be confined to the order of the High Court.  

Under the proposed measure, the judiciary marshals will be primarily responsible for the security, safety, and protection of the members, officials, personnel, and property of the judicial branch, including the integrity of the courts and their proceedings.  

An initial funding of P50 million will be needed for the enactment of the proposed law. The counterpart bill in the House of Representatives was passed on third reading in June. — Alyssa Nicole O. Tan 

Ex-cop revives drug link allegation vs former Duterte adviser 

FORMER POLICE officer Eduardo P. Acierto, who has been in hiding for three years, has challenged a Senate panel to act on his earlier intelligence report linking President Rodrigo R. Duterte’s former economic adviser Michael Yang to the country’s illegal drug trade.  

In a 10-minute video posted on Facebook, Mr. Acierto appealed to the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee to make him a witness as it investigates Mr. Yang, who was implicated in the Budget department’s procurement of allegedly overpriced medical supplies.   

“The real drug lords are Michael Yang and Allan Lim, along with their protectors,” Mr. Acierto said in Filipino, decrying his persecution after he moved to investigate these two personalities.   

The former anti-drug cop said the Senate panel would not be investigating the government’s deals with Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corp. if it had acted on his first report in 2018.  

Mr. Yang has been linked to Pharmally, the government’s seemingly most favored pandemic supplier that got a bulk of government contracts. Pharmally’s executives have identified Mr. Yang as their financier and guarantor to suppliers operating in China.  

Mr. Yang has dismissed claims that he and Mr. Lim had transactional relationships. The latter’s wife, however, had told senators earlier this month that the two were business partners.  

In March 2019, Mr. Acierto accused the President and his former police chief, now Senator Ronald M. Dela Rosa, of blocking a potential investigation into Mr. Yang’s involvement in the illegal drug trade. He also questioned the Senate panel for failing to act on his intelligence report, which linked Mr. Yang to a drug lab that his team raided in Davao City.   

Mr. Gordon said in a media statement then that “all he was saying had no evidence.”    

In the same month, the Presidential Palace announced that Mr. Yang was no longer economic adviser of the President since his contract expired in Dec. 2018.  

AFFIDAVIT
On Monday, Mr. Gordon said in a statement issued after Mr. Acierto’s video circulated online that, “No report or testimony was ever blocked from being displayed to the public.”  

Given the Senate panel’s previous experience with Mr. Acierto, the senator’s office said they strongly suggest “that the former police officer execute and submit an affidavit for further scrutiny before a grant of his request to appear in this or in another investigation is given due consideration.”  

Before the release of a committee report in Dec. 2018, Mr. Gordon’s office said Mr. Acierto privately showed some photocopies of documents linking Mr. Yang to illegal drug operations.   

“Senator Gordon asked Acierto to present his documents and subject them to cross-examination. Acierto, however, did not appear and went incommunicado then,” it said. 

“We nonetheless confirm that Acierto, through an emissary in the Senate, is now ‘more than willing’ to testify on Yang’s alleged drug involvement in the course of the current investigation on the alleged anomalous transactions on the use of the pandemic funds.” — Kyle Aristophere T. Atienza 

Moms’ go-to health app offers big savings on telemedicine

Get 3 doctor video consultations for only P249

Just three months after its launch, Metro Pacific Investments Corporation (PSE: MPI)’s mWell PH has become the go-to app of moms for their health and wellness needs. The app delivers dependable telemedicine services and expert advice straight to the palm of your hands.

This holiday season, we’re giving you more reasons to love this app! Introducing mWell PH’s latest treat – Gift of mWellness. Don’t miss out on the mWellness Subscription Package with 3 doctor video consultations for only P249 – that’s P1500 in savings. Avail now until December 31 with no booking fee. Want to upgrade to 10 doctor video consultations? Choose the P549 package and save us much as P5400 (until November 15 only) – valid for 3 months.

Discover for yourself the top reasons why moms love the mWell PH app:

  • Discovering the mWell PH app was such a relief! It’s an all-in-one app where you can find everything from doctor consultations, healthy recipes, fitness programs and more! It’s an app that moms can depend on. – Sunshine Cruz, Actress, Singer
  • From doctor consultations to fitness programs, mWell is complete. With the mWellness Package, we get 3 doctor video consultations for only P249. Super big savings! — Ara Mina, Actress, Entrepreneur
  • The top feature that I like is being able to book doctor appointments anytime with the option to see a doctor right away. Very convenient! — Gwen Zamora, Actress, Entrepreneur, Fitness enthusiast
  • COVID isn’t the only disease out there. I’m so thankful that I discovered mWell PH app to teleconsult with doctors in just one tap–Roxanne Montealegre, Actress, Host, Designer
  • Being a single working mom is extra challenging especially with the pandemic. That’s why I make sure that I am healthy — physically, mentally, and emotionally so I can take care of my baby girl so much better. I can avail of doctor consultations and wellness tips for my baby and me anytime. —Geneva Cruz, Singer
  • These days, hindi natin maiiwasan ang magka-anxiety lalo na sa mga moms na busy na sa work pero kailangan pa din mag attend ng needs ng kids and family. I’m glad na there’s already an app for online consultation with trusted doctors including pediatricians for our kids. — Empress Schuck, Actress, Fashion Designer
  • The pandemic has caused fear especially for us Moms who worry so much about our family’s health and safety. The mWell PH app has helped me reach doctors who can address my questions and understand what I’m going through. — Nikki Valdez, Actress, Baker
  • Nowadays, health is the topmost priority for our families. We all need a dependable partner like mWell PH that can connect us to doctors and give us nutrition guides and expert fitness programs in one click. —Divine Lee Go, Entrepreneur, Blogger
  • Nakaka-anxious magpunta sa hospitals. Add to that, the demands of caring for a newborn and a toddler at the same time. Good thing I found mWell PH app for doctor consultations and even wellness tips. – Miriam Quiambao, Beauty Queen
  • I’m a COVID survivor, a mom and a doctor so I know very well that going in and out of the hospital is traumatic. Having the mWell PH app can put my mind at ease and helps address medical concerns to avoid self-medication. Xzy Shane Domingo, Dermatologist
  • As parents, we naturally worry about our kids’ health and well-being lalo na ngayon. Many of us have not seen our doctors and missed regular check-ups. mWell PH is the all-in-one app that features 24/7 video consult with any doctor, anytime. – Nina Corpuz, Media Practitioner
  • The partnership between mWell and Glam-o-Mamas couldn’t have come at a more perfect season. In a time when our children are restricted to move around and moms are highly anxious about giving the best care for their family, mWell has provided our community some ease and comfort with their easy-to-use mobile app that allows moms to do online consultations with health professionals. – Trix Clasara, Digital Marketing Head and Community Manager of Glam-O-Mamas, a social media mom community and support group

With mWell, moms can easily reach primary care and specialized doctors including pediatricians. Among them is Dr. Catherine Onghangseng. Doc Cae, as she is fondly called, says “Moms know the importance of regular check-up for kids. Through the mWell PH app, I can easily offer medical advice to moms who can’t bring their kids to the clinic.”

mWell’s growing line-up of partner-doctors includes those from top hospitals such as Makati Medical Center, Cardinal Santos, Asian Hospital and Medical Center De Los Santos Medical Center, Manila Doctors Hospital and Marikina Valley Medical Center.

As a mom, Chaye Cabal-Revilla, Chief Finance & Sustainability Officer of Metro Pacific Investments Corporation, recognizes the need for convenient healthcare for the family. Cabal-Revilla says, “I want to provide the best possible future for my daughter. As part of mWell, I am able to help moms like me receive the healthcare they deserve.”

MPIC Group is committed to work towards the achievement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being. It also supports the MVP Group’s Gabay Kalusugan advocacy focusing on quality and affordable healthcare.

MPIC Chairman, Manny V. Pangilinan says, “MPIC group’s newest foray in digital healthcare brings healthcare closer to every Filipino.” He added that mWell is committed to providing innovative healthcare solutions through a wide and sustainable network of medical experts and services. Beyond telemedicine, Joey Lim, MPIC’s President and CEO said “mWell will be a partner in every stage of the wellness journey.”

In partnership with active8me and Aktivo, mWell offers calorie-controlled recipes developed by nutritionists and workout plans by Olympians and exercise physiologists. Soon it shall enable users to generate their mWellness Score, tracking their physical activities towards a healthier lifestyle. The app’s constantly evolving ecosystem is supported by industry and technology stalwarts including CareSpan, Telus and LotusFlare and runs on fast secure payments via PayMaya.

Download the mWell PH app from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store. Follow mWell on Facebook and mwellph on Instagram for more updates.

 


Spotlight is BusinessWorld’s sponsored section that allows advertisers to amplify their brand and connect with BusinessWorld’s audience by enabling them to publish their stories directly on the BusinessWorld Web site. For more information, send an email to online@bworldonline.com.

Join us on Viber to get more updates from BusinessWorld: https://bit.ly/3hv6bLA.

A new global tax regime

ORIGINAL PHOTO BY MICHAEL LONGMIRE-UNSPLASH

(Second of two parts)

This article focuses on Pillar 2 which requires the imposition of a 15% global minimum corporate tax on multinational enterprises (MNEs).

As mentioned in Part 1, this new global tax regime consisting of a two-pillar solution (Pillar 1 and 2) was agreed to by 136 members of the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) representing more than 90% of global GDP. It is regarded as the most radical overhaul of the global tax system which establishes a new framework for international tax, aligned with a digitalized and globalized economy. (Pillar 1 was discussed in an earlier article).

The core feature of Pillar 2 is the introduction of GloBE or Global Anti-Base Erosion which fixes a global minimum corporate tax of 15% at the overall income of a multinational, and for every jurisdiction it operates, thus putting a floor on tax competition. It requires the ultimate parent company to account for its share of its income from member companies in low tax jurisdiction and taxes that income to the 15% minimum tax.

Overall, GloBE is meant to make MNEs account for the income of its members in various jurisdiction ensuring that the 15% minimum corporate tax is paid in that country. It is a measure to protect the tax bases of countries from harmful tax practices especially with the proliferation of tax havens and the practice of “race to the bottom” lowered tax rates and super generous tax incentives.

How does this work? Multinationals with an effective tax rate below the 15% minimum global tax rate in any particular jurisdiction will be required to pay top-up tax on the income of its members that does not meet the 15% minimum tax.

For example, the parent company of an MNE operating in the Philippines may be required to pay a top-up tax if its effective tax payment in the Philippines is lower than 15%, as in the case where there is availment of generous incentives that brings the effective tax rate below 15%. There are however, carve out rules for incentives based on substantial activities in the host jurisdiction and are meant to support valid policy considerations.

The application of Pillar 2 is not all encompassing. It applies only to large and profitable businesses with global revenues exceeding €750 million (or P44 billion in global revenue), and there are exclusions and carve outs. Industries excluded may include global shipping companies, government organizations and certain fund vehicles. As of now, there are no detailed rules yet for the standard determination of the minimum corporate tax but expectedly, a set of formulaic and non-formulaic standards for global application will be soon be out.

The application of the global minimum tax consists of four principle-rules, as follows:

i. The Income Inclusion Rule (IIR), which imposes a top-up tax on a parent entity in respect of low taxed income of a constituent member entity. The IIR will require a parent company to bring profits of foreign subsidiaries into account for domestic taxation. It will apply in respect of each jurisdiction in which the MNE group has a subsidiary or branch.

Under the IIR, the effective tax rate of each jurisdiction, calculated in accordance with specific global minimum tax rules, will be determined based on all of the consolidated companies or branches in that jurisdiction. It will then be compared with the minimum effective tax rate (ETR) of at least 15%. Top-up tax will be charged to the head office to make up for any shortfall. For example, if a wholly owned subsidiary has an ETR of 12%, based on a minimum rate of 15%, top-up tax at 3% should be applied at the level of the parent on the subsidiary’s undertaxed income.

ii. The Undertaxed Payments Rule (UTPR) denies deductions or requires an adjustment to the extent the low taxed income of a branch or subsidiary is not subject to the global minimum corporate tax.

It acts as a backstop to IIR to deal with circumstances where the IIR is unable, by itself, to bring low tax jurisdictions in line with the minimum rate. This reduces the incentives for tax driven inversions where business entities relocate operations overseas to reduce their income tax burden. Companies undertaking a corporate inversion usually select a country which has a lower tax rate than their home country. The UTPR discourages this practice.

iii. The Switch-Over Rule (SOR) enables jurisdictions to overturn treaty obligations where there are commitments to exempt incomes attributable to foreign permanent establishments under tax treaties. This will enable jurisdictions to remove tax treaty hindrances and subject the income to the minimum tax.

iv. The Subject to Tax Rule (STTR) allows the source jurisdiction to impose tax on certain related-party payments below the minimum rate. The STTR is a treaty-based rule, which may override treaty benefits in existing treaties in respect of certain payments where those payments are not subject to a minimum level of tax in the recipient jurisdiction. The covered payments include interest, royalties and other payments for mobile factors such as capital, assets, or risks.

IMPLEMENTATION
At the latest by the end of 2022 an implementation framework will be developed that facilitates the coordinated implementation of the GloBE rules. Pillar 2 should be brought into law in 2022, to be effective in 2023, with the UTPR coming into effect in 2024.

The implementation framework will include safe harbors and other mechanisms to simplify administration and implementation. It will be a targeted implementation, as much as possible, to avoid compliance and administrative costs disproportionate to the objectives of the measures.

WHAT’S IN IT FOR THE COUNTRY?
Foremost, the imposition of the GloBe Rules relieves the country from the pressure of having to compete in providing excessively generous tax incentives or low taxes in what we call a “race to the bottom” practice around the region. It levels the playing field in attracting investments, staying away from the use of fiscal incentives, and focusing instead on non-fiscal attractiveness of the country. To the extent that the income is subject to a floor or a minimum tax of 15%, the incentive to shift or siphon income out of the country is lessened.

Even post CREATE, our corporate tax of 25% remain the highest in the region which could make us still a favorite victim of harmful tax practices, base erosion and profit shifting, by multinational enterprises operating in the country. With the 15% global minimum tax, the incentive to shift income to low tax jurisdictions, would be lessened, though not totally eradicated unless we bring our corporate tax rate to 15%.

Will it remove tax competition? Not totally, but it will be lessened. There would still be variations in tax rules in each jurisdiction and MNEs would still try to maximize those differences for higher group profits.

In terms of revenue, it is expected that the Philippines, considered as a high-tax jurisdiction (thus, a natural favorite victim of harmful tax practices) compared to its peers, will earn additional revenues from these measures. Based on OECD estimate, corporate tax avoidance costs countries anywhere from $100 billion to $240 billion annually, which is equivalent to 4% to 10% of global corporate income tax revenues.

WHAT TO WATCH OUT FOR
The proposals open up as many questions as they answer. The four components of Pillar 2 are complex and have a significant overlap and it is far from clear how they will interact. One thing is clear — it will be difficult for developing countries like the Philippines to implement and achieve the Pillar 2 objective of a minimum effective tax.

The two-pillar Blueprint acknowledges that both the Subject to Tax Rule and the Switch-Over Rule would require changes to existing bilateral tax treaties which could be implemented through bilateral negotiations and amendments to individual treaties or more efficiently through a multilateral instrument.

While the Income Inclusion Rule and the Undertaxed Payment Rule could be implemented through changes to domestic law, this by itself is also a difficult and long process. Also, further guidance and mechanisms should be developed to ensure there is a consistent, comprehensive and coherent application of these rules, and there is effective overall coordination of their application across multiple jurisdictions. This would require a comprehensive model legislation and guidance together with a multilateral review process.

The practical application of Pillar 2 would also be a challenge for developing countries since it will be difficult to determine the tax base for global income. The Pillar 2 consultation document suggests the use of consolidated financial statements but that pose its own challenges. Which accounting principles (GGAP) should be used? How will local tax authorities audit consolidated financial statements? How will the change in tax base bring changes to accounting principles?

It is not without a doubt whether the Blueprint will be enforced — they will certainly be enforced in the years to come.

Where we end up remains to be seen but businesses and governments should keep abreast of developments to enable them to remain agile, review their operations and prepare for adoption. This is the main objective of this article.

This article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or MAP.

 

Benedicta “Dick” Du-Baladad is chair of the MAP Tax Committee, and founding partner and CEO of Du-Baladad and Associates (BDB Law).

map.map@map.org.ph

dick.du-baladad@bdblaw.com.ph

Marketing a presidential candidate

I liken a presidential campaign to a total marketing effort, the electorate to the market, the candidate to a brand, public opinion polls to market surveys, platform speaking to product display, hugging voters and shaking their hands to personal selling, and assistance in cash or kind to barangay projects to sales promotions. Advertising a candidate is exactly the same as advertising a brand.

Some candidates, like many senior executives from other management disciplines, think that advertising is all there is to marketing, or that advertising and marketing are synonymous. That is why the air lanes are now saturated with advertisements of candidates for public office when the official campaign period for next year’s elections has not yet started. The advertisements were crafted to sound and look like information spiels or “infomercials” to avoid running into conflict with election laws.

In product advertising, the No. 1 principle of effective advertising is that the advertisement must be consumer oriented, meaning it should say what benefit the consumer would derive from the product. A commercial that says Brand X is the No. 1 in the market would not be as good as one that says Brand X provides the benefit you seek, like “it makes your breath smell fresh.” Principle No. 2 says the benefit promised should be the most important among the several benefits that can be derived from the product, as in “It’s so juicy, you need no sauce.”

Similarly, advertisements of political candidates should be voter oriented. The advertisement should address the need of the voter, his interest, and his values. It must tell the voter that he or she is the best person among the candidates that can meet the need of the voter. The difference between product advertising and presidential candidate advertising is that the former addresses only a segment of the entire market, like only the young or the budget-conscious, whereas the latter must convince the entire voting population, young and old, rich and poor, educated or school dropout, to get elected.

Principle No. 2 of effective advertising (the advertisement should be focused on only one benefit, the most important one to the target market segment) may not be applicable in presidential candidate advertising. The advertisement should convince every socio-economic and geographical sub-group of the entire voting population. Necessarily, the candidate has to make multiple promises.

The advertiser of a product determines through market surveys what benefits the target consumers are looking for in a product and which benefit among many is the most important to them. Some political candidates are oblivious to the importance or necessity of a methodical study of the electorate first before they launch their campaign. They do not believe in surveys. They cannot comprehend how the opinions of 1,200 people could reflect the sentiments of millions of voters scattered all over the archipelago.

Many presidential candidates have been guilty of this serious blunder. During the presidential race of 2016, candidate Miriam Defensor Santiago asked, “Why is it that when universities are asked, from left to right, it is Miriam? But if commercial surveys are conducted, I’m not even there.”

She was “disheartened” by the national surveys. She had fared very well in campus surveys and mock polls. That was because her public appearances were mostly in universities. She did not speak to other sectors of Philippine society — the farmers in Central Luzon, the factory workers in the Calabarzon area, the fishermen in Southern Mindanao, and many more. The people the major pollsters, Social Weather Stations and Pulse Asia, interviewed represented all the sub-groups of the voting population. Collectively they reflect the sentiments of the entire electorate.

In the 2010 presidential derby, candidate Gilbert Teodoro, who did not believe in public opinion polling or surveys, used “Talino at Tiyaga” (Talent and Perseverance) as his campaign watchword. Had his campaign staff studied the electorate, they would have learned that it was riling at the immoderate greed, unconscionable extravagance, and brazen abuse of power of the Gloria Arroyo presidency. Teodoro was Arroyo’s own choice to succeed her. Benigno Aquino III, who ran with the slogan “Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap” (If there is no corruption, there is no poverty) was elected president. Teodoro placed fourth in the race.

Candidate Richard Gordon, another detractor of surveys, adopted the campaign theme “Pagbabago” (Change). If he had a survey done on how the voters saw him, he probably would have found out that in the eyes of the voters he was a “trapo” the pejorative sense of traditional politician. In the view of the voters, the “trapo” Gordon could not possibly bring about change. He garnered only a half million votes or 1.4% of the total cast for presidential candidates.

Only Mayor Isko Moreno and former Senator Bong Bong Marcos among the presidential candidates have so far produced and aired advertisements. Panfilo Lacson’s launch of his candidacy was obviously filmed in a recording studio under the direction of a professional group. It seems it was meant to be a TV commercial. There are only copies of the live coverage of the launch of the candidacies for president of Vice-President Leni Robredo and Senator Manny Pacquiao.

Isko Moreno’s infomercial says he will be a healing president who will work with anybody to achieve national reconciliation and reconstruction based on justice and the rule of law. Bong Bong Marcos promises in his advertisement new life, to provide jobs, find new sources of energy, and develop agriculture. Ping Lacson’s video has the message “Enough is enough, right the wrong, this is the beginning.”

It seems to me that those promises were not based on formal research, for if they were, there would be some uniformity in the promises of the candidates. Scientific surveys, though conducted by different professional research groups, would have come up with the same findings: what the voters’ need, interest, and values are. The candidates’ promises would have been their responses to those issues. The responses therefore should have been similar.

The advertisements should vary only on the qualifications of the candidates for the presidency. The advertisements of Moreno, Marcos, and Lacson do differ in that regard. Isko projects the image of one who raised himself by his own effort from the depth of poverty to mayor of the premier city of the country. He can raise the great majority of the Filipino people from poverty to comfortable life. Bong Bong, as the son of the president who was supposed to have been responsible for the golden age of the Philippines, can bring about good times again. Ping, once the chief of the national police, can bring peace and order in the country.

The next reports of pollsters Social Weather Stations and Pulse Asia will tell us if those images and promises work.

 

Oscar P. Lagman, Jr. had worked for a public opinion/market research firm, an advertising agency, and taught marketing subjects in three graduate schools.

Vaccination plateau and rising cases, Part 2

This is a follow-up to this column’s Sept. 20 piece (https://www.bworldonline.com/vaccination-plateau-and-rising-cases/), and also complements a BusinessWorld Nation story yesterday about the government plan of compulsory vaccination, “Analysts warn against compulsory vaccination” (https://www.bworldonline.com/analysts-warn-against-compulsory-vaccination/).

I downloaded the excel file in Our World in Data (OWID). The numbers can be complicated because there are many columns and indicators, plus there are many rows per country representing daily data from February 2020 until Nov. 6, 2021 for many countries and regional blocs.

To simplify the presentation, I took the average of daily cases from July to November this year, the vaccination rate since June 1, and COVID-19 deaths per million population at six months apart from Nov. 6, 2020.

Countries in group A are Europeans with recent rises in cases, group B are Asians also with rising cases, group C are those somehow flattening their lines but at a high number of cases. Other countries in Europe with rising cases — Armenia, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Georgia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Ireland, Lithuania, Moldova, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, few others — I did not include to simplify the table that accompanies this article. Three countries with recent declining cases but which I included anyway are the Philippines, Australia, and the US, indicated by an asterisk. The reason? Well, I often read about them.

Several important trends are showing. One, there is a “vaccination plateau” once 50% or more of the population in a country has been inoculated. Examples are Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Austria, Hungary.

Two, a rise in cases and infections from July-August to September-Nov. 6 coincided with the rise in vaccination rates. In particular, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Australia, Singapore.

It is possible that a vaccination plateau is due to hesitance by the public upon seeing or reading about more infections and deaths with new variants and the vaccines seem unable to protect the inoculated.

Three, rich countries with high vaccination rates of 60%+ of the population like Germany, Belgium, and the UK continue to suffer high rates of infections and high death rates, more than 1,000 COVID-19 deaths per million population (CDPMP).

Take also Singapore with a vaccination rate of 80%, which went from only five CDPMP until May 6 this year, then it jumped to 81 six months later. And more dramatic is Vietnam with a vaccination rate of 60% this month. From only 0.4 CDPMP last May, it hopped to 229 this month. It is an “outlier” case and can elicit vaccine hesitancy among the non-inoculated people yet.

Four, the Philippines has a relatively high rate in Asia of nearly 400 CDPMP, but compared to many countries in Europe, and North and South America, ours would look mild and does not warrant all the draconian policies like long curfew hours, mandatory face shields in public, closure of many provincial boundaries, shut down of many businesses for 19 months.

So, the planned mandatory or compulsory vaccination by the government, whether by legislation or by discrimination, plus local governments pressuring the residents to be inoculated is not justified. For three reasons:

One, government has zero discrimination in tax collections, it just imposes the taxes and fees on everyone, vaxxed or unvaxxed. Two, people’s right to mobility does not come from government but from our being humans, guaranteed by the Constitution’s Bill of Rights and not just from any RA or EO. Three, even vaxxed people can infect and be infected, the virus does not discriminate between the vaxxed and unvaxxed.

Let vaccination be voluntary and not mandatory. Many people believe in the protective power of vaccines, others still have lots of questions and reservations about COVID vaccines. Both should be respected to avoid unnecessary divisiveness in society.

Other ways to ensure that cases and infections can be controlled without forced inoculation are: 1.) give away human-grade ivermectin and immune-boosting vitamins and supplements as prophylaxis to elderly, those with comorbidities; 2.) have an early treatment protocol for those with symptoms and recovering at home, avoiding hospitalization; and, 3.) have faith in natural immunity from natural infection, which is more long-lasting than vax immunity that wanes in a few months and would need regular booster shots. I am in my late 50s, never had a flu or pneumonia vaccination in my entire life, not once, and I am fine. Natural immunity works perfectly with me.

The Concerned Doctors and Citizens of the Philippines (CDC PH) is planning to hold a COVID Summit with some doctor friends from the US plus locals, later this month.

 

Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Minimal Government Thinkers.

inimalgovernment@gmail.com

People’s movements and the 2022 presidential election

Elections are the means to s/elect leaders and governments. Through elections, we can hold leaders and governments accountable, although with varying success. Through elections, we can ensure that citizens’ interests and needs are represented in the democratic process, although not all the time. Most importantly, through elections, we get to exercise our right to vote, although we don’t always choose to cast our vote.

In elections, political parties usually play an important role. A political party fields its candidates during elections and ensures its candidates win. Winning an election means seizing power in government. The more seats a party wins, the greater its control over the decision-making processes.

In the Philippines, political parties have never reached a 100% mark for relevance and utility during elections. Where votes are based on candidates and personalities rather than party principles or ideals and social issues, political parties fail in aggregating all interests and socializing voters to choose on the basis of party platform, ideology, or performance.

What’s wrong with Philippine political parties?

Since time immemorial, party switching has been common in the Philippines. Politicians gravitating towards the party in power has been a constant feature of every new administration. Is the presidential system of government at fault? Or is the lack of a sense of party loyalty among politicians the culprit?

What may be worse than disloyal party members are the self-serving if not self-aggrandizing party members. Writing about weak intra-party solidarity that marked the Philippine party system, Carl Lande (1967) highlighted “rebel candidates” among “party members who, having failed in their efforts to have themselves named their parties’ ‘official candidates,’ run for office nonetheless despite the fact that by doing so, they will assure the defeat of their party’s official candidates at what otherwise might have been certain victories.” Weak intra-party solidarity is also evidenced by “the existence of many arrangements for mutual help between candidates of opposite parties running for different offices.” This isn’t déjà vu, right?

If not for the political resources that a political party may provide, why would one covet a political party’s support during elections when political party membership is not even one of the qualifications for an elective office? Even the party-list system is not spared from unscrupulous politicians who run under the system without a track record of advocacy for that sector one supposedly belongs to and represents.

Without conventional politics — that is, political parties effectively steering the public space — and with the stakes much higher in the upcoming 2022 presidential election, the alternative is for citizens to resort to creating “people’s movements” at various levels of engagement where they can create popular spaces and mobilize support for their candidates. Through these people’s movements, citizens hope to expand the political space available to them and bring in the concerns of everyday life. If they succeed, they can vote into office the candidates that they support; and if they get luckier, they can initiate changes in the structures of power and domination that operate in the society.

But would people’s movements win the 2022 election?

Like social movements, people’s movements present themselves as symbols of resistance to the dominant powers and to those seeking a path back to power. These movements offer a ray of hope to hold the government (past and present) accountable for its excesses and consequently, initiate process of social change.

Unlike “old” social movements, which were more class-based and sought power, these people’s movements demand democracy. By organizing themselves as people’s movements, they provide an alternative to the conventional form of politics which is more of a power game.

But can these people’s movements win the 2022 election? Hopefully, yes! But only if these people’s movements can keep their popular spaces growing in terms of both numbers and significance and attain the scale and strength capable to persuade voters on the election day in May 2022. But how will they do this? Let’s leave it to the seasoned political strategists to worry about this question.

Instead, we ask, “What can the people’s movements, which have mushroomed in recent months, learn and adopt from social movements?”

Nardini, et al. (2020) in their article, “Together We Rise: How Social Movements Succeed,” offered a framework for explaining how social movements succeed in creating social change. Building on the findings of extant research on social movements, Crutchfield’s (2018) research at the Global Social Enterprise Initiative at Georgetown University, and insights from consumer psychology, Nardini et al.’s framework highlights broad actions leading to the success of a social movement. The framework provides some useful tips for people’s movement organizing for the 2022 presidential election.

1. Build grassroots momentum. Grassroots organizing or local groups targeting and organizing their own communities is the key. Success is likely if individuals and groups at the grassroots level are enjoined and connected both to the movement’s cause and through relationships between the movement’s members.

2. Connect people to the movement. Individuals and groups must feel that they belong and that they matter to the movement. The more they feel connected, the stronger their group engagement is, and hence, makes them feel powerful. When they feel powerful, they are more likely to develop stronger, more certain convictions; and when they do, they become more committed to the cause.

3. Connect movement members to each other. This is important for developing a collective sense of purpose and identity, thereby reinforcing shared views and positions. Regardless of where it takes place, either in shared, physical spaces or in online platforms, what matters more is that these connections must happen.

4. Build a network to connect the movement. To reach optimal efficiency, strong ties (i.e., with close friends) and weak ties (i.e., with distant acquaintances) between members must be nurtured for information and resource sharing. Through the networks and the brokers of the networks, bystanders may be transformed into upstanders.

5. Be leaderful. Movements need not be leader-led or leaderless. Instead, develop a hybrid form of leadership in which multiple leaders and organizations collaborate through coalition building, power-sharing, decentralized grassroots organizing, and collective decision making.

6. Win hearts and minds. Anger, frustration, feeling of exclusion are not the sole motivators for individuals and groups to join a movement. Combining negative emotional cues with positive messages such as strength, inspiration, helping messages can mobilize broader social support and spur action. Moreover, use the power of storytelling — the sharing of a movement’s narrative. More importantly, as movements navigate between physical spaces and online platforms, work toward winning hearts and mind through online connections and interactions in lieu of offline interactions.

How are the people’s movements faring in engaging in these actions? How far are we from winning the 2022 election?

 

Diana J. Mendoza, PhD is an assistant professor of Political Science at the Ateneo de Manila University.

Global coronavirus infections reach 250 million

GLOBAL COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) cases surpassed 250 million on Monday as some countries in eastern Europe experience record outbreaks, even as the Delta variant surge eases and many countries resume trade and tourism.

The daily average number of cases has fallen by 36% over the past three months, according to a Reuters analysis, but the virus is still infecting 50 million people every 90 days due to the highly transmissible Delta variant.

By contrast, it took nearly a year to record the first 50 million COVID-19 cases.

Health experts are optimistic that many nations have put the worst of the pandemic behind them thanks to vaccines and natural exposure, although they caution that colder weather and upcoming holiday gatherings could increase cases.

“We think between now and the end of 2022, this is the point where we get control over this virus … where we can significantly reduce severe disease and death,” Maria Van Kerkhove, an epidemiologist leading the World Health Organisation, told Reuters on Nov. 3.

Infections are still rising in 55 out of 240 countries, with Russia, Ukraine and Greece at or near record levels of reported cases since the pandemic started two years ago, according to a Reuters analysis.

Eastern Europe has among the lowest vaccination rates in the region. More than half of all new infections reported worldwide were from countries in Europe, with a million new infections about every four days, according to the analysis.

Several Russian regions said this week they could impose additional restrictions or extend a workplace shutdown as the country witnesses record deaths due to the disease.

VACCINE INEQUITY
Several world leaders have stressed the need to improve vaccination programs around the world, particularly in the least wealthy countries.

More than half the world’s population has yet to receive a single dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, according to Our World in Data, a figure that drops to less than 5% in low-income countries.

Improving vaccine access will be on the agenda of meetings of the powerful Asia-Pacific trade group APEC, hosted virtually by New Zealand this week.

APEC members, which include Russia, China and the United States, pledged at a special meeting in June to expand sharing and manufacturing of COVID-19 vaccines and lift trade barriers for medicines.

“Together we are continuing to keep supply chains functioning and are supporting trade in critical medical supplies — including testing kits, PPE and now vaccines,” New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Monday.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and other aid groups last month appealed to leaders of the world’s 20 biggest economies to fund a $23.4 billion plan to bring COVID-19 vaccines, tests, and drugs to poorer countries in the next 12 months. — Reuters

Business leaders optimistic climate conference’s visions will become reality

REUTERS
People carry a sign as they attend a protest during the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26), in Glasgow, Scotland, Britain, Nov. 6, 2021. — REUTERS/YVES HERMAN

BOSTON/GLASGOW — A week into the United Nations’ high-profile climate conference in Glasgow, executives and financial analysts said they are optimistic the talks will lead to changes needed for business to play a bigger role in tackling climate change.

The business observers pointed to several steps by world leaders they said could boost sustainable business and investing efforts to mobilize the vast sums of money needed to wean the world off fossil fuels.

These include a pledge by financial firms with a combined $130 trillion in assets to focus on climate change, the creation of a global standards body to scrutinize corporate climate claims, and pledges to cut methane emissions and to save forests.

Jefferies managing director Aniket Shah said although many of the steps lacked specific promises, they showed a global consensus forming to tackle climate change that will make it easier for private investors and governments to put in money and effort.

“There’s a certain power of signaling of intentions that can’t be dismissed here,” Mr.  Shah said. He pointed to the goal set by India’s prime minister, Narenda Modi, on Nov. 1 for his country to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2070.

Although two decades later than what scientists say is needed to avert catastrophic climate impacts, the pledge was still more than India had offered in the past and could be accelerated with financial help from developed nations, Mr. Shah said.

Peter Lacy, Accenture’s global sustainability services lead, said that for investors and companies, the most significant step at the conference was the creation on Nov. 3 of the International Sustainability Standards Board, meant to create a baseline for companies to describe their climate impact.

Mr. Lacy called it a seismic moment for business and in line with the hopes of CEOs Accenture surveyed ahead of the conference.

The new board, Mr. Lacy said, “will give investors and stakeholders a much better understanding of related risks and opportunities and help guide the allocation of the huge amount of capital needed as the world transitions to net zero,” he said via email.

LACK OF DETAIL
Critics say many of the conference’s key announcements lack specifics and give companies wiggle room. For instance, banks, insurers and investors pledged to work to cut emissions to net zero by 2050, but each entity has made its own net zero commitments “with potential overlap across initiatives, institutions and assets,” according to the group’s press statement.

Leslie Samuelrich, media of Green Century Capital Management in Boston, which does not invest in fossil fuel stocks, said she worries bigger investment firms signed on so quickly to carbon-reduction pledges advertised at Glasgow because their terms might be too easy to meet.

“The speed with which some have adopted this makes me cautious,” Ms. Samuelrich said.

But other finance executives say it is inevitable businesses will move to cut emissions under pressure from customers and to chase profits. Mark Haefele, chief investment officer for UBS Global Wealth Management, said promising areas include renewable energy, transport and batteries.

Diplomats now must hash out rules on areas like constructing markets to help businesses price carbon and how much developed nations will help poorer ones.

On a call with journalists on Friday, David Waskow, a director of the nonprofit World Resources Institute, said he was more optimistic than a week ago that the attendees would strike meaningful agreements.

“I think the beginning of the week actually did lay good groundwork. Not to say everything is all rosy,” he said. — Reuters

Malaysia fails in its bid to forfeit luxury goods seized from former PM

REUTERS

MALAYSIA’S government failed in its attempt to forfeit luxury items seized from former Prime Minister Najib Razak and his family members.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court on Monday dismissed the suit, saying the government failed to prove that the goods were bought using 1MDB funds. The government will appeal the decision, Deputy Public Prosecutor Harris Ong Mohd Jeffery Ong said.

“It is apparent that the investigating officer came to this conclusion based on his presumption. This is insufficient as they need to credibly prove a direct link between the money that was gained illegally to the cash found as well as the items bought,” Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan said.

The ruling follows the government’s failed court bid in May to prove the 114 million ringgit ($27 million) seized from a residence linked to Mr. Najib was part of 1MDB’s stolen funds. Mr. Najib had claimed the cash was for election purposes.

The cash and the luxury goods were part of the 1.1 billion ringgit of items seized in 2018 amid investigations into 1MDB. The inventory included a 6.4 million ringgit diamond necklace, Hermes bags and Rolex watches.

The raids occurred a month after Najib’s coalition lost the national elections, the first change in government since Malaysia achieved interdependence from Britain in 1957. — Bloomberg

Crypto queens: Women stake out space in blockchain world 

UNSPLASH/THOUGHTCATALOG.COM

As an artist and women’s rights activist, Maliha Abidi is adept at using digital technologies, so when she came across non-fungible tokens (NFTs) she quickly figured they could be a way to reach more people, and for women artists to gain a bigger following.  

Ms. Abidi, 25, who was born in Pakistan and migrated to the United States as a teenager, created her first NFT a few months ago — a type of asset which uses blockchain to record ownership of digital items such as images, videos, and collectibles.  

The UK-based activist is about to launch Women Rise, a campaign to bring 100,000 girls and women into cryptocurrency by the end of 2022.  

She is one of a growing number of women artists, coders, entrepreneurs, and investors embracing cryptocurrency and NFTs, and advocating for other women to join the blockchain movement and bridge the gender gap in this quickly expanding space.  

“When I first heard about blockchain, I didn’t think it was for me. But I was attracted to the art, and realized artists can be a part of this, and that it can be an inclusive space for women and people of color,” she said over a video call.  

“NFTs give people who haven’t had the opportunity to invest in or sell their art the traditional way, a chance to do so. Crypto and NFTs are a path to financial independence, so it’s important that women and girls know about them,” she said.  

As large institutional investors pushed bitcoin to record highs this year, adoption of cryptocurrencies has grown amongst younger investors and in developing countries, where anyone with a mobile phone can bypass the formal banking system.  

India has the most crypto owners in the world at about 100 million, according to platform BrokerChooser, compared to about 27 million in the United States and 17 million in Russia.  

Meanwhile, sales of NFTs surged to nearly $11 billion in the third quarter of 2021, up more than eightfold from the previous quarter, according to market tracker DappRadar.  

But more than two-thirds of US cryptocurrency investors are men, and about 60% are white, according to a recent survey by CNBC and Acorn, a gender gap that is wider than in other financial investments such as stocks, bonds and mutual funds.  

While a crypto exchange in India said only 15% of its users were women.  

“The crypto world seems to mirror the tech and finance worlds in terms of gender; there are women, but the space is heavily male-dominated,” said Angela Walch, a research associate at the UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies in London.  

“As crypto becomes more mainstream, it is important to have diverse perspectives in creating and running the systems so that better decisions can be made,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.  

MORE INCLUSIVE 
Less than half of women worldwide use the internet, compared to 55% of men, with the gap wider in poorer countries, according to the United Nations’ technology agency (ITU).  

Similarly, women also lag men when it comes to managing and accessing assets or financial services worldwide, according to the World Economic Forum’s annual gender gap report.  

Blockchain technology — which underpins cryptocurrency and NFTs — has been hailed as a path to a fairer, more transparent and inclusive world with its decentralized format.  

And cryptocurrencies are quickly shifting from the fringes of finance to the mainstream, with investors, companies and countries adopting them as an asset, as a payment vehicle, and as a hedge against uncertainty and hyperinflation.  

NFTs meanwhile, have drawn celebrities, artists, and investors, with the sale of a digital collage this year for more than $69 million recorded as the most expensive NFT sale so far — even as the number of NFT buyers remains relatively small.  

But while cryptocurrency has drawn younger people, as well as a mix of races, women only make up about a fifth of US investors, the CNBC poll showed.  

Black women — who historically have been shut out of many investment verticals — make up just 4% of crypto investors.  

This is why British-based entrepreneur Lavinia Osbourne founded Women in Blockchain Talks as a space for women, and plans to launch an NFT marketplace called “Crypto Kweens” for female artists, entrepreneurs, and collectors.  

“The inequity exists so deeply and systematically in society, and people bring their biases into all walks of life,” she said, adding that she had faced bias “steeped in racism”.  

“This is why it is so important for diverse voices to be a part of the blockchain conversation — if not, we will have a repeat of the inequality that exists elsewhere,” she said.  

CRYPTO CHICKS 
With Twitter handles such as @crypto_chicks, @NFTgirl and @BTCbombshell, women NFT artists and collectors flaunt their affiliation on social media and cheer each other on. Many also support charitable causes for women and girls.  

Their work is gaining recognition: a physical version of an NFT from Boss Beauties, a collection of 10,000 NFT portraits of women, was displayed at the New York Stock Exchange last month.  

While Tavonia Evans, a US-based data scientist who goes by the Twitter handle @cryptodeeva, created Guapcoin, a cryptocurrency to “amplify the economic voice of the Black community.”  

“The crypto world is an extension of the tech space, with a huge diversity gap,” she said, adding that access to capital remains a huge challenge for women of color.  

“That’s why we created Guapcoin — to focus on our own underserved community and do our job in closing the gap,” said Ms. Evans, who is a member of the National Policy Network of Women of Color in Blockchain that advocates for greater inclusion.  

Efforts such as these will go a long way in bridging the gender gap in blockchain, said Ms. Walch.  

“There are quite a few women leaders in the crypto space who are well respected, who command strong influence within the space and have credibility with policy makers,” she said.  

“Their successes should draw other women to crypto.”  

While many of the prominent female crypto investors and artists are in the West, more women are entering the space in countries such as India, and artists including Sneha Chakraborty and 14-year-old Laya Mathikshara are fast gaining a following.  

“When I started, it took me time to find women, and women of color, and have my questions answered,” said Ms. Abidi, who was looking forward to meeting many of her peers at the NFT conference in New York City last week.  

“But once you get past the white male gatekeepers, there is a great community of women here. I think crypto has the power to  

radically advance women’s rights,” she said. — Rina Chandran/Thomson Reuters Foundation