Home Blog Page 10489

Davao airport authority expected to increase flight connections

By Maya M. Padillo
Correspondent

DAVAO CITY — A law creating the Davao International Airport Authority (DIAA) is expected to improve airport facilities and increase the city’s overseas connectivity, the business sector said.

President Rodrigo R. Duterte signed into law a measure creating the DIAA on Aug. 30.

Davao City Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Inc. (DCCCII) President Arturo M. Milan said Davao residents can now expect more rapid development of the airport in terms of terminal upgrades and foreign direct flights.

In an interview, Mr. Milan said the law will also make DIAA the premier gateway to Mindanao and to the BIMP-EAGA (Brunei Indonesia Malaysia Philippines-East Asean Growth Area) countries.

“The terminal has to be expanded and I heard they will start second half of next year. Our terminal is a bit congested with so many domestic flights and four direct (international) flights,” he said.

Mr. Milan is expecting two new international services to Davao to be established within the year. He said there is a need to expand the terminal and cargo-handling facility because the city is looking at supplying international markets with food and livestock.

In 2017, Mr. Milan said there was a need for more focused management of the airport through the creation of an independent authority similar to the Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority (MCIAA).

“The long wait is over and we at the Davao City Chamber would like to thank the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the President for making Davao International Airport into an authority,” he said.

Generose D. Tecson, City Tourism Operations Office (CTOO) head, said she is looking forward to an improved airport.

“(The airport is important) for impressions of tourists when they come to Davao… I am looking forward to a beautiful airport, one that showcases the culture of the region. Once people get in they get the feel of what Davao really is all about,” she said.

The Mindanao Development Authority (MinDA) has welcomed the signing of Republic Act 11457 creating DIAA.

In a statement, MinDA said it is expecting the development and improvement of the airport facilities, and responsive airport management, which is at par with the best airports.

MinDA also said the measure will help the city become an investment and tourism destination in the ASEAN and BIMP-EAGA sub-region.

The Republic Act No. 11457 if formally known as “An act creating the Davao International Airport Authority, transferring existing assets of Francisco Bangoy International Airport to the Authority, vesting the Authority with power to administer and operate the Francisco Bangoy International Airport and appropriating funds therefor.”

Government debt rises 72% as of end-July

GOVERNMENT DEBT rose by 72.8% year on year at the end of July to P729.27 billion, the Bureau of the Treasury said.

In its latest cash operations report, BTr said new borrowing in July from foreign creditors amounted to P1.67 billion, against P4.58 billion in net redemptions of debt owed to domestic creditors.

In the seven months to July, overseas borrowing was P119.13 billion while domestic borrowing amounted to P610.14 billion.

Project loans in July totaled P3.22 billion, up from P1.68 billion a year earlier.

The government is looking to raise P1.189 trillion this year from domestic and foreign sources to fund its budget deficit, which is expected to widen to as much as 3.2% of gross domestic product. — Beatrice M. Laforga

Intellectual property applications climb 11% in first half

THE Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) received 11% more intellectual property applications in the first half of 2019, IPOPHL said in a statement Saturday.

IPOPHL said it received 20,628 applications for trademarks, inventions, utility models, and industrial designs in the six months to June.

IPOPHL Director-General Josephine R. Santiago said the office is actively conducting including intellectual property education and awareness campaigns; capacity-building of Innovation and Technology Support Offices; and expanding the number of Intellectual Property Satellite Offices (IPSOs).

“Society is now appreciating the IP system more than ever,” Ms. Santiago said.

Trademark filings rose by 11% year-on-year to 18,964 in the first half. Most applications were for agricultural products and services; pharmaceuticals, health, cosmetics; and scientific research, information, and communication technology.

Patent filings grew 4% to 1,991. The US, Japan, and China were the top countries of origin, accounting for 24%, 20%, and 13% of applications respectively.

Patent applications from Philippine residents declined 40% to 148, while non-resident filings rose 10% to 1,657.

Utility model filings grew 31% to 1,173 in the first half, with most applications covering food chemistry, handling, and furniture and games. A utility model is a form of minor patent with less stringent requirements.

Industrial model filings rose 14% to 824. Most applications were for furnishing; packages and containers for the transport or handling of goods, and means of transport or hoisting.

Resident filings for industrial models rose 44% to 567, while non-resident filings fell 22% to 257.

Copyright filings, which are excluded from the total intellectual property tally, rose 53% to 990.

IPOPHL noted in its statement that applications for intellectual property in the first half have not yet established a marked trend, and that it is eager to view full-year totals.

“IPOPHL looks forward to seeing the year-end figures to assess how it compares with last year’s overall growth. This way, the Office is able to evaluate in a broader approach how certain government strategies and policies affect society’s utilization of the IP system, the degree of which is one of the criteria at which innovation and economic progress are pegged,” it said. — Jenina P. Ibañez

PTT wins P13.35-M VAT refund from CTA

THE Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has ordered a P13.35 million refund on erroneously paid value-added tax (VAT) by PTT Philippines Trading Corp. covering its imports of petroleum products.

In a 19-page decision on Aug. 29, the CTA third division said PTT is entitled to a refund on amonts taxed when it imported fuel after Revenue Regulations No. 2-2012, which was the basis for the payment, was declared null and void by the Supreme Court (SC).

“Apparently, RR No. 2-2012 directly contravenes the tax exemptions granted to petitioner under RA No. 7227, amended by RA No. 9400. Since RR No. 2-2012 is of no force and effect, respondents’ imposition of VAT on petitioner’s importation of diesel is without valid basis,” the court ruled.

“Hence, the VAT payment made by petitioner on the importation of diesel is erroneous and illegal,” it added.

Section 12 of Republic Act No. 7227 or the Bases Conversion and Development Act of 1992, grants locators in the former Subic and Clark military reservations incentives such as tax and duty-free importation. PTT operates a fuel receiving terminal in the Subic Special Economic Zone.

RR No. 2-2012 which imposes taxes on Freeport and Economic Zone (FEZ) enterprises, has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court for illegally imposing taxes on FEZs which enjoy tax–exempt status.

PTT imported diesel fuel from Sept. 20, 2013 to Jan. 20, 2014 and paid VAT worth P13.35 million to the Bureau of Customs.

“In view of the foregoing, petitioner is entitled to the refund of the illegally collected or erroneously paid VAT on the importation of diesel in the amount of P13,347,275.20,” it added.

Under Section 24 of the Republic Act No. 7916, or the Special Economic Zone Act of 1995, no taxes shall be imposed on business establishment within economic zones.

The court noted that laws mentioned considers FEZs as foreign territories and when goods are brought to these zones, the goods remain in foreign territory and are not subject to Philippine customs and tax laws. — Vann Marlo M. Villegas

Preparing for the IBOR transition

(Second of two parts)

In the first part of this article, we highlighted the current state of Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs), the factors behind the shift from IBORs to Alternate Reference Rates (ARRs), and the top 10 challenges to be faced in transitioning to the ARRs. In this second part, we will delve into the key operational, financial and accounting considerations that come along with the imminent discontinuation of IBORs.

It is expected that the broad impact of transitioning to ARRs will be felt not just by banking and capital market organizations, but also by corporates with significant exposures to IBOR-linked instruments. This impact will cut across various functions within an organization, including treasury, legal, finance and risk. Given this, it is imperative for market participants to quickly assess the cross-functional implications of the transition to their businesses and clients. Having an awareness of these implications early on will help an organization plan for an efficient transition. Here are some of the key considerations for organizations before the IBOR reform is implemented:

Determining your exposure to IBOR — Developing a detailed inventory of IBOR-linked products and contracts will be cumbersome for many organizations with existing financial contracts that are not digitized. The organization will have to ensure that relevant contract terms, including any fallback provision, are captured so that all legal and financial risks are determined.

Contract renegotiations — IBOR-linked products and contracts may need to be modified and renegotiated. While the International Swaps and Derivates Association provides protocols to facilitate amendments to contracts between counterparties, having a huge number of derivative contracts to be amended can be a tedious task. For cash products, the renegotiation may be more burdensome due to the non-standard nature of most of the contracts. Multilateral negotiations will also be required for bonds, syndicated loans and other securitized products. It will also be necessary to establish governance processes and controls to avoid any financial, legal and operational risks.

Impact on IT systems and infrastructure — The shift to ARRs will require changes to various platforms (e.g., valuation, trading and risk management systems) within the organization’s IT systems.

Recalibration or redevelopment of models — Organizations need to build an inventory of all its pricing, valuation and risk models that use IBORs as an input and assess the need for recalibration or redevelopment. Any change in the models will also impact the front (in terms of pricing strategy and new product offerings) and back-office processes of the treasury function and will warrant an update of the organization’s risk management strategy.

Accounting and hedging — The transition to IBOR will have a significant impact on various aspects of accounting, more notably on the application of hedge accounting and derecognition assessment for any contract modification due to changes in reference rates. Although amendments to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments are underway to address some problematic hedge accounting issues pre-IBOR transition, financial reporting issues post-IBOR transition are still to be dealt with by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The pre-IBOR transition issues covered by the proposed amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 9 relate to the assessment of the probability of the hedged forecasted IBOR cash flows occurring, assessment of effectiveness of hedging relationships and the immediate release of any amount lodged in equity to profit or loss if hedged IBOR cash flows will no longer occur.

WHAT ORGANIZATIONS SHOULD START DOING NOW
Given the various considerations discussed above and the impending completion of the IBOR reform by local jurisdictions, there is a need for organizations to plan and prepare for a smooth transition to ARRs. As discussed in a recent EY publication titled How will you respond to IBOR transition (https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-end-of-an-ibor-era/$FILE/EY-end-of-an-ibor-era.pdf), organizations must establish an IBOR transition program as a necessary foundation upon which they can plan their transition strategy and implementation programs. Here are recommended steps in establishing an IBOR transition program according to the EY report:

Assemble a broad-based IBOR transition team — Mobilize a formal IBOR transition program team with a strong governance framework and senior leadership appointed to oversee and report progress to relevant executive committees and the board. This program team should be cross-functional in nature, with business leaders represented from inception.

Conduct a comprehensive impact assessment — The impact assessment should cover all areas of the business that are exposed to IBOR. This would include:

(1) product assessment — categorize and quantify financial IBOR exposure by various parameters, including maturity, optionality, counterparty, client segment, business and jurisdiction;

(2) legal contract assessment — extract and analyze the contractual language of the impacted products with a priority on positions that are due to mature beyond 2021;

(3) risk assessment — analyze the potential impacts of transitioning to ARRs on the risk profile and financial resources of your organization;

(4) operational assessment — identify impacted areas, including systems, models and processes that are linked to current IBORs; and

(5) inventory management — establish and maintain an inventory of products and contracts linked to IBORs across jurisdictions.

Develop a transition roadmap — A comprehensive implementation roadmap is needed for prioritized initiatives, including key workstreams, projects, milestones and ownership. A strategy for educating and communicating with both internal and external stakeholders should also be addressed, including clients, technology vendors, regulators and industry bodies.

Launch the formal IBOR transition program — Publish a multi-year enterprise-wide transition program, including a program charter, a stakeholder map and resourcing requirements.

As the pace of IBOR transition picks up, complacency will be detrimental to organizations with significant exposure to IBORs. Considering the complexity and wide-ranging scope of the transition, these organizations should initiate steps to prepare and make the most out of this exercise. A “wait and see” approach to implementation will not work with the overwhelming challenges that are expected to emerge when the IBOR is discontinued. At this point, an organization that can get ahead of the curve will have the advantage of identifying early market opportunities with the new ARRs.

This article is for general information only and is not a substitute for professional advice where the facts and circumstances warrant. The views and opinion expressed above are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of SGV & Co.

 

Janice Joy M. Agati and Redgienald G. Radam are Senior Directors from SGV & Co.’s Financial Service Organization service line.

A message of thanks

A statement I often hear from Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III is his recognition of the contribution of his predecessors and the previous administrations in providing the building blocks for the current comprehensive tax reform program. Recently, in a thanksgiving lunch he hosted for former finance secretaries, other former senior government officials, and reputable economists and technocrats from the private sector and civil society, including critics of the administration, he again emphasized that the current Department of Finance (DoF) has built on the good work that others have done.

This is very true. To illustrate, the Dominguez tax reform program is a continuation of the tax reform agenda of his predecessor, former Finance Secretary Cesar Purisima. The saga of the tax reform actually started in 2012 when the Benigno S. Aquino administration succeeded in restructuring and increasing the excise taxes on tobacco and alcohol products. It was a bitter struggle that was narrowly won, but it was a big victory. This episode demonstrated that politically influential vested interests could be beaten and that a bad tax law that held sway for 15 years could be overhauled. It likewise created a new and broader tax reform constituency, which now has been a vital cog in the economic reform struggle.

Unfortunately, the Aquino administration was not able to follow through after the 2012 sin tax victory. Its political capital diminished in the second half of the president’s term in the wake of the pork barrel controversy and the fallout from the Mamasapano massacre. Aquino himself was reluctant to endorse the controversial fuel tax despite the recommendation of some of his reformist allies in the Cabinet.

The gargantuan task to put in place a more comprehensive tax reform has become Dominguez’s challenge. It is noteworthy that such reforms are being introduced despite the absence of an economic crisis. Before, policy makers introduced reforms in response to crises. But this is the way to go: Pursue the hard measures when economic times are good. Note that Secretary Dominguez is spearheading not only tax reforms but also other reforms that generate controversy and unpopularity like rice tariffication and investment liberalization. These measures nevertheless are necessary to improve consumer welfare, create the incentives that will boost the productivity and incomes of our farmers, and generate investments that will create quality jobs and enhance the skills of our workers.

It is most kind of Secretary Dominguez to acknowledge the contribution of the former Finance Secretaries in paving the way for the current successful initiatives. Yet, we likewise have to give much credit to Dominguez and his DoF team for initiating and engineering the current tax reform that will certainly have a most profound impact both for the short term and the long term.

This comprehensive tax reform, bold and ambitious, has finally gained momentum and is nearing completion. The reform has provided personal income tax to compensation earners even as it has generated substantial revenue from the other elements of the reform. The first package of reforms that has passed includes the higher excise taxes on tobacco, automobiles, coal, and mining; the introduction of an excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages; and the elimination of economically unjustified exemptions on the value-added tax on many goods and services.

The biggest generator of additional revenue has been the correction of the specific tax on fuel products, which heretofore were never adjusted to inflation for more than 20 years. The fuel tax burden actually falls mainly on the rich. Compared to the poor, the fuel consumption of the rich and upper classes accounts for a higher percentage of their total spending and total income. And although the poor were still affected by higher fuel products, 60% of the Filipino households — constituting the poor and the near poor, received unconditional cash transfers, which more than offset the higher spending.

Despite the implementation of the increased taxes on consumption at the start of 2018, poverty incidence among families still fell from 22.2% in the first semester 2015 to 16.1% in the first semester of 2018. A decline of six percentage points in a short span of three years is most significant. What accounts for this needs further scrutiny. But surely, the tax reform has not been poverty inducing and is in fact paving the way for providing essential goods, stimulating spending and investments, and creating jobs for the longer term.

What remains to be done to complete the comprehensive tax reform is going full speed ahead. In a span of two months, the House of Representatives has submitted bills on higher taxes on alcohol, electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products to the Senate. The House has recently approved the rationalization of fiscal incentives together with the lowering of the corporate income tax. Also sailing smoothly are the reforms on passive income, financial taxes, and real property valuation. The remaining measures respond to the objectives of fairness, progressiveness, simplicity, and efficiency at the same time that they generate the sustainable financing for social and economic services.

The pending reforms will likely be completed in record time. But it is not the time to be overconfident. The advocates have to continue exerting utmost effort to defend and advance the progressive reforms. It ain’t over till it’s over.

In conclusion, Dominguez and his team have made it easier for the next administration (as well as succeeding administrations) to pursue a new generation of reforms. In the same way he has given credit to his predecessors for the current successes, we likewise have to thank Dominguez and his DoF team for accomplishing the hardest reforms that will have long-lasting impact on Philippine development.

 

Filomeno S. Sta. Ana III coordinates the Action for Economic Reforms.

www.aer.ph

Bottom-line and Mother Earth meet in the rooftop solar power array

Every summer, when the sun is beating down hard on the archipelago and dam water levels are low, a familiar visitor comes a-calling in the islands. Its name: Red Alert. It comes mostly in mid-afternoons and early evenings. Its message: be forearmed for a power outage is nigh. And when in some areas the warning blows real, economic activity slows down or stops altogether. With some untimely equipment failures, brownouts envelope more areas and a power crisis is declared, followed by the familiar howl and congressional hearings.

We know the terrain well. The Department of Energy will say it’s because our power reserves are too thin and power generation must be augmented, preferably with nuclear power. Correct, but no longer newsworthy. The question is why we have let it fester for so long. One reason is that on the whole we have sought relief only in bulking up our centralized generation system.

The centralized system requires large initial and continuing deployment of capital and good regulations to run properly. Capital and good regulations are very deficient in many jurisdictions, resulting in frail and high-cost power service. Frail power systems lead to poor economic performance and poverty. End-users are limited to consumption.

But 21st century technology has now managed to combine consumption and production of power among end-users at very competitive cost. In sun-drenched areas, the technical breakthroughs in solar photo-voltaic (PV) and battery storage are breaking the grip of the traditional problem of intermittence from clouds, rain, and night hours. Battery power storage is the missing key to unlocking the immense PV potential.

Grid-tying technology is one way out. Grid-tied PV systems use the existing power grid as storage — power produced with solar panels during daylight is exported to the grid when in excess of own consumption; power is imported from the grid when solar power is unavailable, at a price agreed upon with the local distribution utility. This now is a well-travelled territory with known technical and regulatory problems and solutions.

The problem for households is essentially capital constraint — the initial cost of a home PV system can be prohibitive for most households who face competing investment such as for a car. Easy bank financing for a car purchase exists although a solar PV installations is by far a better long-term investment than a car. Banks foot-drag because, unlike a car, solar PV installations are fixed in situ and cannot be readily repossessed and resold in a second-hand market.

Big companies or conglomerates are a different matter altogether. First, these are not capital-constrained; or they can readily secure bank financing if needed. Second, they have longer time horizons where solar PV installations are most advantageous. Third, most of these conglomerates already have hectares of idle rooftops in their possession currently earning nothing. If converted into extensive urban solar farms, these idle rooftops can become new revenue streams for these companies. Think about the Ayala Group, the SM Group, or the Gokongwei Group. They spend enormous amounts on purchased electricity and draw enormous amounts of power from the grid; thus, contributing to the frequent yellow alerts. Some of these companies (SM, for one) already own Retail Electricity Supplier (RES) subsidiaries and thus are accredited electricity suppliers, if only RCOA (Retail Competition and Open Access) is not stuck in regulatory mess. I dare say that if only 30% of the power needs of large public and private establishments with idle rooftops (factories, malls, school and government buildings, supermarkets, gas stations, etc.) are generated by rooftop solar installations, the Philippines can kiss power outages goodbye. And we won’t wait years to clear the jungle of right-of-way, environmental permits, and NIMBY issues.

FREEPIK/JCOMP

When the grid is down, solar PV installations cannot supply power unless the system is equipped with battery storage capacity. So without battery storage, back-up generators still have to be run on “idling” mode or on rev-up, burning polluting fossil fuel. There are now grid-scale batteries that can deliver five to 100 megawatts of power for hours. These batteries can replace back-ups and peakers as well as feed power into, and stabilize, grid operation. Needless to add, off-grid systems become viable 24/7 only with batteries. The price of these grid-scale batteries is falling fast, what with technical advances, scale production, and competition.

An attractive feature of solar PV installations is that they are modular and scalable. The company can start with a small installation and scale up as the need arises. They more importantly economize on a scarce resource: regulatory quality. There is wisdom in the wit of savvy meat-eaters: “You don’t buy meat by the cow; buy meat by the kilo.”

Grid stabilization in our centralized power system depends upon pumped hydro and peaking plants which are switchable at an instant. In the Philippines, an additional stabilizer is the Interruptible Load Program (ILP) — large establishments stop drawing power from the grid and run their own back-up generators when surges of demand threaten to overwhelm the current capacity. These establishments are then reimbursed by the grid operator for the difference in cost. Grid-scale batteries spread among many establishments or owned and operated by specialized battery companies can replace peaking plants and back-up generators as ILP grid stabilizers.

On the battery front, kudos to Aboitiz Power for initiating a 48-megawatt battery storage plant at its Magat Hydroelectric Plant. AES in Masinloc is building a 10-megawatt battery storage instead of a peaking plant to help stabilize the grid. Kudos, likewise, to SMC for committing to build a portfolio of 16 battery storage plants around the country for a total of 520 megawatts. Fossil-powered peaker and back-up plants beware — economics is out to get you. On the rooftop solar farming front, kudos to Double Dragon Corp. for committing to equip its City Malls all over the country with solar PV-capacity and even to Celebrity Sports in QC for being now so equipped.

These companies are re-tooling to become the disruptors rather than the disrupted in the solar PV revolution! About time the environment committees of Congress consider a contingent tax on idle rooftops — you become exempt only when you generate at least 30% of your power needs. All government building plans should henceforth include solar PV facilities.

And, by the way, distributed and modular power greatly reduces our carbon footprint even as it raises our resilience to climate disasters. Bottom-line, resilience and Mother Earth meet in the rooftop solar PV!

 

Raul V. Fabella is a retired professor of the UP School of Economics and a member of the National Academy of Science and Technology. He now also holds an Honorary Professorship position at the Asian Institute of Management. He gets his dopamine fix from hitting tennis balls with wife Teena and bicycling. 

The sociology of EDSA traffic

Of course you can call or text on your phone while driving. You can even read your e-mail and reply quickly on your iPad. You might want to catch some quick news on Yahoo, or get your daily fix of cute dog antics on YouTube.

Better to do something fun rather than cry at Waze app street maps veined in bloody red, showing heavy traffic. On the highway that is called EDSA, the pulse of traffic is a faltering 10 kilometers per hour when it moves and engines are idling in near comatose standstill more often than laboriously heaving forward. The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) publicly declared in 2017 that there were around 7,500 vehicles using EDSA per hour per direction, well beyond its carrying capacity of 6,000 vehicles per hour per direction.

A BusinessWorld graphic last May showed that a total average of 367,728 vehicles pass through EDSA daily, composed of 247,527 cars, 69,438 motorcycles, 20,022 taxis, 12,283 buses, 8,830 trucks, 7,229 utility vehicles, and 2,399 various “others.” Intrapolating the graphic’s total average divided by two directions into the MMDA’s per hour per direction would roughly show that EDSA is tight 24 hours a day, perhaps only easing in the wee morning hours. EDSA = traffic = EDSA, any day including weekends and holidays. The MMDA is now strictly enforcing the rule that buses and other mass transit must keep within the two-lane “yellow lane” that segregates them from private cars, and that busses must not linger to pick-up or unload passengers at designated stops. Clearly the more numerous private transport suffer more as their space in the 10-lane (five each way) EDSA has been constricted to the three unrestricted lanes that funnel into two in places where the monster columns footprint of the overhead Metro Rail Transit (MRT) stomp on precious EDSA space.

Many plans and programs to improve traffic in Metro Manila have been designed by the Transportation Departments of this and previous political administrations. A Manila Bulletin editorial on July 6 showed a chronology of these efforts, including the attempt at the beginning of the Duterte administration to ask Congress for emergency powers which, the government said, are needed to solve the problem that is EDSA. Nothing came of it. Yet by the “President’s own optimistic projection… by December (2019), a trip from Cubao to Makati along EDSA should take just five minutes,” it noted. Secretary Mark Villar of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) hastened to correct this to “EDSA traffic will return to ‘acceptable’ levels by the end of the President’s term in 2022,” the editorial quoted.

The absurdity of the promises call forth absurd solutions aired by the government itself, such as cable cars over EDSA and point-to-point helicopters to pluck commuters from chosen starting points to plop them on contracted destinations. And then of course the textbook solution to traffic congestion is a developed public transport network. But the Boston Consulting Group, in a study called “Unlocking Cities,” said even government plans to increase the capacity of rail-based public transport services “will not be sufficient to meet growth in transport demand” over the next five years, an article in the Inquirer pointed out.

We could have done better, if we had done proper urban planning well and early enough. Metro Manila’s population has boomed in recent years to about 12.2 million individuals (swelling to 15 million in the daytime), or about 12% of the country’s total population, according to government statistics. City streets are narrow, and have become more congested as there is thin and weak access to the huge subdivisions built within already over-populated traditional communities. Towering vertical developments (condominiums and office buildings) pour tens of thousands of their occupants into the dyspepsia of traffic on the tiny access and feeder roads and onto EDSA, which is the main and only workable artery to work and home for many commuters. Notice the huge and dense mixed-use condominiums being built along EDSA itself!

And so we must talk of too many cars that are the main reason for the traffic problem of EDSA. The over-population of communities along and near EDSA comes with an automatic increase in the number of private cars. The Chamber of Automotive Manufacturers of the Philippines Inc. and the Truck Manufacturers Association declared that vehicle sales had grown by 16%, from more than 292,000 units (additional to existing vehicles) in 2016 to close to 340,000 units in 2017, and this is still growing. They say this is mainly because many buy an extra car (or two or three for family members) for the dead days when the family car is “coded” for off-road.

But why are people buying cars instead of using public mass transport?

PHILIPPINE STAR/MICHAEL VARCAS

Manong Frankie, is it because cars are a big status symbol for Filipinos? F. Sionil Jose, National Artist for Literature, writer-sociologist-historian, was consulted for his deep insight into the Filipino soul and mind, and his perception of Filipino values and mores, as conveyed with such clarity and impact in the realism of his novels and writings. He said, “You are talking about the traffic in EDSA, and wondering whether we Filipinos have created this monster, as we have created many monsters for ourselves? Yes, we are a specially different people and culture. Look at the streamlined and efficient public transport system in Japan!”

But, Manong Frankie, the Japanese of all social classes are using their mass transport system. Would an executive in a stylish business suit or pristine barong Tagalog ride the MRT or LRT, much less a public bus or a tired jeepney, and press bodily with the “unwashed masses,” going to and from work? Would his/her family be seen riding public transport? For proffered reasons of safety and security, and doubtful “convenience,” a family that has “arrived” in the ascending elitism of society must arrive in day-to-day destinations in a car — a long-standing status symbol, not only in the Philippines, but in most of the world since early history when nobility rode in personal chariots or carriages.

In many businesses, an employee who has reached supervisory or managerial rank is offered a company car plan to buy a car commensurate to his/her self “packaging” as a person to be looked up to by the lower ranks and the public. As promotions come, the employee is exhorted, if he/she does not voluntarily opt to upgrade to a higher-model car, partially financed, or wholly paid for by the company. These efforts in the business organization to “package” the employee for internal and external “marketing” shows that cars are indeed a persistent status symbol in society.

The difference between the Japanese and us is their discipline and guiding harmony in the present, Zen Buddhism permeating their demeanor and social interactions. We have a different make-up, influenced by the hierarchical templates imposed by colonizers and the Catholic Church, Manong Frankie said. And thus driving an air-conditioned car that sits on EDSA for the two hours from Cubao to Makati would be reinforcing social status, in lieu of sitting in low-class public transport that would take the same two hours on the road as well.

And so, we will have more cars and more traffic on EDSA. The banks and car companies are gleefully enjoying double-digit profit growth from easy-installment sales of more cars. It has been suggested by many that the purchase of new cars should be limited on a quota basis like in Singapore, but officials said this is not feasible here because purchases in the provinces of cars to be used in Manila cannot be controlled.

So, playing on the status-symbol aspect of car-owning and the seeming aversion of the social classes to mix in mass public transport, perhaps a new genre of limited public transport can be installed on EDSA: Super-streamlined, state-of-the-art, point-to-point coaches with “snob pricing” (expensive, but cheaper than bringing a car) can be made available to the higher-status commuter. And those rickety buses beyond an age limit, and those scraggly jeepneys should be banned from EDSA. Motorcycles, too, should take the side roads, not EDSA.

Yes, perhaps the EDSA mess is all about status.

 

Amelia H. C. Ylagan is a Doctor of Business Administration from the University of the Philippines.

ahcylagan@yahoo.com

Our ties with Mexico and its story of reinvention

At 2:30 a.m. on Sept. 16, 1810 in Dolores, Mexico, Father Miguel Hidalgo ordered the church bells rung as he gathered his congregation. There, he cried out against the abuses of the Spaniards and the many Criollos (wealthy Mexican mestizos) who oppressed the Mexican masses. He urged the faithful to revolt against Spain. That event, known today as “Grito de Dolores” (“Cry of Dolores”), marked the start of Mexico’s 11 year struggle to be a self-governing republic. On Aug. 24, 1821, Mexico’s fight for independence came to a victorious end with the signing of the Treaty of Cordoba. Mexico considers Grito de Dolores as its spiritual day of Independence.

The recorded history between Mexico and the Philippines goes back almost 500 years. Following Magellan’s demise, the first Spanish expedition to the Philippines was lead by Ruy Lopez de Villalobos. His 400 men sailed from Jalisco in November 1542, not from Spain, as many believe. Villalobos was responsible for naming our islands “Filipinas.”

Another expedition from Mexico set sail to the Philippines in 1565, this time lead by Miguel Lopez de Legazpi. Legazpi was a Spaniard who was then the Governor of Mexico City. Legazpi landed in Cebu to claim the Philippines as a Spanish colony.

In 1571, Legazpi designated Manila as the colonial capital of the Philippines under the Spanish crown. Interestingly, however, the Philippines was governed not by Spain itself, but through the Viceroy of Nueva España (Mexico). The Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade was at the heart of Philippine-Mexican relations. Within a span of 250 years, both colonies thrived from a virtual monopoly of Pan-American trade. More importantly, a transfusion of cultures, ideas and customs flourished between the two.

The lucrative trading route ended in 1815 when the Mexican War of Independence ended Spain’s control over Mexican ports. But not even the termination of the Galleon trade could get in the way of the cooperation between Mexico and the Philippines. In fact, two Filipinos — Francisco Mongoy and Isidro Montes de Oca — fought alongside Vicente Ramón Guerrero, the leading revolutionary generals in the Mexican war for independence. Hence, it could be said that the Philippines helped Mexico gain its freedom.

After Mexico seceded from Spain in 1821, Spain tried to cut ties between the Philippines and Mexico lest the idea of revolution spread among Filipinos. It was only then that the Philippines was governed by Governor Generals coming directly from Spain. Sometime in the 1820s, Vicente Ramón Guerrero was quoted as saying: “Now that we have gained our independence, it is our solemn duty to help the less fortunate countries, especially the Philippines, with whom our country has the most intimate relations with.” The Philippines freed itself from Spanish colonial rule 67 years later.

Like a Mexican telenovela, Mexico’s journey towards economic prosperity came with peaks, troughs, and drama. It started with a policy of import substitution that took place from the 1930s to the 1970s. The policy worked and Mexico experienced an economic boom where industries rapidly expanded. The Mexican population doubled from 1940 to 1970 while GDP increased sixfold.

Mexico began to harness its oil reserves in the ’70s and readily became the world’s 4th largest exporter of the commodity. Wealth generated from oil allowed massive spending on infrastructure and social development programs.

The plunge in oil prices in the late ’70s and early ’80s resulted in a severe economic downturn for Mexico. In 1981, President Jose López Portillo suspended payments of foreign debt, devalued the currency and nationalized the banking system. Exacerbating the situation was the fact that import substitution and protectionism left many Mexican industries inefficient and unable to compete in the global marketplace.

Mexico needed to reinvent itself — it needed to build competitive industries and wean itself from dependence on oil. It was at this time that President Miguel de la Madrid opened the economy to free trade. Deregulation and the privatization of industries followed including the state-owned oil company, PEMEX. From an oil-driven economy, Mexico transformed itself into manufacturing and agro-industrial force through capital and technologies obtained from foreign investments. It was in this time that Mexico became a signatory to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).

A turning point came when Mexico became a signatory to the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1992. Due to affordable wages and the high productivity of Mexican workers, Mexico was the preferred site for most Canadian and American manufacturing concerns. Throughout the ’90s, industrial outputs grew steadily as did exports despite political instability such as the Chiapas Uprising, the assassination of presidential candidate Luis Donaldo Colosio, and the massive devaluation of the peso. The Mexican economy grew by 5.1% from 1996 to 2000 as trade with the US and Canada tripled.

Throughout the administrations of President Vicente Fox, Felipe Calderòn, and Enrique Peña-Nieto, Mexico continued along the path of free trade. During Fox’ administration, several Free Trade Area agreements were signed with Latin American and European countries, Japan, and Israel. Mexico became one of the most open countries in the world to do business with.

Today, Mexico is an economic force to be reckoned with. It has the 15th largest global economy, almost equal in size to that of Spain. With a population of 127 million, each Mexican citizen has an average annual income of $9,807, establishing it as an upper middle income economy. Unemployment is at 3.4%, among the lowest in Latin America. It is the 46th most competitive global economy and the 54th (out of 190 countries) easiest country to do business in. In 2018, it spent $9 billion on research and development which established it as the 56th most innovative country in the world.

Mexico is the 9th largest export economy and the 21st most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). Last year, Mexico exported $450 billion worth of cars, trucks, computers, smart phones, electronic products, aerospace parts, and agro-industrial goods, among others. The country is considered the manufacturing hub of the Americas.

Moreover, Mexico has the distinction of being one of two Latin American nations inducted into the exclusive group of OECD countries. For those unaware, countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are high-income economies committed to democracy, free trade, and international cooperation.

But like any telenovela, more drama lurks on the horizon. The US is becoming increasingly protectionist and is pushing to replace NAFTA with a new trade pact called USMCA, or the United States, Mexico, Canada Agreement. USMCA comes with stricter labor and environmental qualifications and intellectual property protections.

Under USMCA, automobiles must have 75% of their components manufactured in Mexico, the US, or Canada to qualify for zero tariffs (up from 62.5% under NAFTA). Moreover, 40-45% of automobile parts must be made by workers who earn at least $16 an hour. Mexico had to pass new labor laws to adapt. Terms of copyright protection have also been extended from 50 to 70 years.

When ratified by all three countries, the shift in trading terms will have a tremendous effect on the Mexican economy. Mexico is economically dependent on the US, what with 80.3% of its exports sold to its northern neighbor.

Economic challenges at home coupled with US President Donald Trump’s nagging threat to slap a five to 25% tariff on Mexican imports are putting pressure on the 10-month-old administration of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Mexico needs to change its course yet again. It is now looking to pivot to South America, Europe, and Asia as its new export market. The Philippines is its preferred gateway to Asia.

Reinvention is not new to Mexico. As we have seen, it succeeded in evolving from an economy built on import substitution to one driven by oil. In just a few years, it morphed into a powerhouse exporter of industrial and agricultural products to the US and Canada. I have no doubt that it will succeed in its next stage of reinvention.

Mexico is a nation of strong resilient people. Just as Father Miguel Hidalgo cried for change and succeeded in his quest for independence from Spain, so will Mexico succeed in its quest for economic independence from the US. We wish Mexico all the best on its national day.

 

Andrew J. Masigan is an economist.

UP edges Adamson in OT

By Michael Angelo S. Murillo
Senior Reporter

A “SHORED-UP” University of the Philippines Fighting Maroons swung back to winning in Season 82 of the University Athletic Association of the Philippines, beating the Adamson Soaring Falcons, 83-82, in overtime on Sunday at the Mall of Asia Arena in Pasay City.

Absorbed their first defeat last time around, the Maroons (2-1), who finally welcomed Kobe Paras in their fold after sitting out their first two games because of injury, avoided losing two in a row with a gutsy win over the Falcons (2-2), who saw their two-game ascent halted.

Earlier in the day, the University of Santo Tomas Growling Tigers also got back to winning, outlasting the National University Bulldogs, 87-74, in overtime.

Dave Murrell and Paras got UP to a strong start with their hustle and shot making in the paint.

But Adamson managed to get its footing and made a run, led by Lenda Dounga.

When the opening-quarter smoke cleared, the Falcons were on top,20-18.

The two teams struggled with their offense to start the second frame until Val Chauca stopped the drought at the eight-minute mark to make it 22-18 for Adamson.

The Falcons continued to soar after that, outscoring the Maroons, 6-4, in the next three minutes to stretch their lead, 28-22, at the midway point of the second quarter.

It was all Adamson the rest of the way as it sped to 41-25 advantage at the break.

UP narrowed the gap in the third quarter as it opened with a 16-3 run in the first five minutes, led by Noah Webb and Juan Gomez De Liano, to make it a 44-41 affair.

Jerrick Ahanminsi stopped the bleeding for Adamson with a deuce but Paras answered back with four straight points to push UP to within a point, 46-45, with 3:30 to go in the frame.

UP finished the frame with a 7-4 blitz to complete the turnaround in the quarter and go on top, 52-50.

The teams jostled to start the fourth quarter.

It was a tied count at 64-all with 4:23 to go.

Adamson held a narrow one-point lead, 69-68, heading into the last two minutes.

Adrian Manlapaz made it a three-point cushion, 71-68, with a basket in the paint.

UP sued for time after to set up a play.

Bright Akhuetie drained a deuce off a putback to push the Maroons to within a point, 71-70, with 1:24 on the clock.

Two free throws by Jerom Lastimosa with a minute to go pushed the Falcons to a three-point lead, 73-70.

But Javi Gomez De Liano drained a game-tying triple with 17 seconds left to make it 73-all.

The Falcons set up a play for the win but Chauca’s three-point heave failed to connect, sending the game to overtime.

Adrian Manlapaz provided a spark for Adamson in OT, helping his team to an 82-75 lead with 2:22 to play.

The Maroons came to within a point, 82-81, with 30 ticks left.

UP got the ball back off an Adamson turnover.

It got further break as Akhuetie was fouled with 2.8 seconds remaining.

The UP big man made his free throws to make it 83-82 for his team.

Adamson called time out after.

But no salvage work would be completed by the Falcons as UP held on for the win.

Paras led UP with 20 points followed by Akhuetie with 18 and Juan Gomez De Liano with 12.

Chauca, meanwhile, paced Adamson with 21 markers with Manlapaz chipping in 17 points.

Astros’ Greinke beats all 30 major league teams

KANSAS CITY — Zack Greinke pitched six strong innings to become the 19th pitcher to defeat all 30 major league teams, as the Houston Astros beat the host Kansas City Royals 6-1 Saturday night.

Kyle Tucker had four hits, including the go-ahead single in the sixth inning for the Astros.

Houston (97-53) saw its magic number to clinch the American League West reduced to six. Oakland beat Texas later Saturday, but Houston maintained a 7 1/2-game lead over the A’s.

Greinke (16-5) allowed one run on six hits. The former Royals first-round pick (sixth overall) in 2002 struck out seven and didn’t walk anyone. He is the third Astro to reach 16 wins this season.

Mike Montgomery (3-9) took the loss. He gave up two runs on five hits in five-plus innings. He struck out one and walked five.

The Royals opened the scoring in the third inning, as Whit Merrifield drove home Nicky Lopez with an RBI double to the wall in left center. Lopez was originally ruled out at the plate, but the call was reversed after the Royals challenged. Merrifield went to third on the throw and was there with no outs, but Greinke retired the next three hitters and stranded him.

Alex Bregman tied it in the fourth with his 36th home run, just over Alex Gordon’s glove and into the first row in left field. The Astros put runners on second and third with one out, but Montgomery retired the next two batters.

Houston took the lead in the sixth after a walk to Bregman and back-to-back singles by Yuli Gurriel and Tucker to start the inning. An error on Lopez at second loaded the bases and ended the night for Montgomery.

Reliever Tim Hill came in and got a strikeout, popout and flyout to leave the bases loaded.

The Astros scored three runs in the eighth on a three-run, pinch-hit home run by Yordan Alvarez. It was the first pinch-hit home run for Alvarez, and the first runs allowed in the majors by reliever Gabe Speier.

Houston Astros added a run in the ninth for the final margin. — Reuters

Ceres stays in top form with 7-0 rout of Air Force

DEFENDING Philippines Football League champion Ceres-Negros FC continued with its top level of play in the ongoing season, fashioning out a 7-0 victory over Philippine Air Force FC on Saturday at the Aboitiz Pitch in Lipa City, Batangas, for its 14 straight win.

Towed by the hat trick of Robert Lopez Mendy, the “Busmen” were simply unstoppable for the “Airmen” when they finally got their collective groove.

The win took Ceres to a 14-1-0 record with 43 points, six clear of their closest pursuer Kaya FC-Iloilo (12-1-2) while the defeat sent Air Force to its 14th defeat of the tournament as opposed three wins and two draws. Bienvenido Maranon opened the scoring for Ceres, finding the bottom of the net in the 32nd minute.

The goal started a strong finishing kick for the Busmen in the opening half, that saw them score two more goals — OJ Porteria (35’) and Mr. Lopez Mendy (38’) — to make it a 3-0 count by the halftime break.

The Ceres juggernaut continued in the second half despite the Air Force’s staunch resistance.

Back-to-back goals by Mr. Lopez Mendy in the 72nd and 75th minute made it a 5-0 lead for his team.

From there, Ceres never looked back.

Goals from Mike Ott (85th) and Dennis Villanueva (87th) after completed the rout.

“It’s not easy to play after the long break. It’s normal that we start slow in the beginning but later it was a very easy game after the fifth goal. It’s always difficult to switch on the competitive level but we always tried to play the way we did,” said Ceres coach Risto Vidakovic, whose team saw some of its players play recently for the Philippine men’s national football team for the joint qualifiers for World Cup 2022 and Asian Cup 2023.

Ceres battles Kaya on Sept. 18 at the Biñan Stadium in Laguna. — Michael Angelo S. Murillo

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT