Home Blog Page 10008

Lawmaker seeks probe on Taal Volcano info campaign, emergency response

A LEGISLATOR has filed a resolution seeking to conduct an investigation into the alleged “lack of dissemination of information” on the hazards of the Taal Volcano’s eruption. Rep. Elpidio F. Barzaga, Jr. of the 4th District of Cavite, one of the affected provinces, filed House Resolution 643 on Monday, which directs the appropriate House committee to probe if the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (Phivolcs) did a “comprehensive monitoring” on the active volcano. “Although we recognize the challenges of the Phivolcs, there should still be an investigation if it has conducted comprehensive monitoring, its use and availability of monitoring equipment and if it has the technical expertise to make a timely forecast of the Taal Volcano eruption” part of the resolution states. “To be sure, due to lack of information, in the afternoon of the same day, while Taal Volcano is already manifesting increased volcanic activity, people still traveled towards it, while those who were already near Taal Volcano were shocked to see the smoke spewing from it and had to immediately flee under the dangers of ashfall,” Mr. Barzaga said. Last Sunday, Phivolcs raised the alert level on Taal Volcano from 1 to 3 earlier in the day, then to 4 by evening, the second to the highest level. Mr. Barzaga also aims to determine the necessary improvements needed in the emergency response system of government agencies such as Phivolcs, Philippine National Police, Department of Social Welfare and Development, and the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council to reduce the risks of natural disasters. The Cavite lawmaker also wants to file appropriate charges against “unscrupulous persons” who raised the price of face masks, food and other supplies during the eruption. — Genshen L. Espedido

Virginia Farms interested in Iloilo slaughterhouse operation

CEBU-BASED Virginia Farms Inc. is interested in investing for the upgrade and operation of the Iloilo City slaughterhouse into a Double AA classification under the National Meat Inspection Service (NMIS). “I have had talks with the manager of Iloilo Terminal Market and NMIS. ‘Yung slaughterhouse natin, it cannot even serve outside of Iloilo City. We are willing to invest and we can improve it with our expertise,” Virginia Farms President Rolando Tambago said in a press conference last week for the launching of two branches of Pork Shop, the company’s retail arm. Mr. Tambago said the city abattoir’s existing system is “very traditional” and needs improvement, which he said could take a year to implement. He said they are looking at the possibility of renting the property under a long-term lease contract instead of a public-private partnership (PPP) arrangement. “Most probably PPP, but the more shortcut is the rental… we will invest and it will be managed by Virginia Farms,” he said. Iloilo Mayor Jerry P. Treñas recently announced that the city slaughterhouse is one of the projects being eyed under a PPP scheme. — Emme Rose S. Santiagudo

Lawyer withdraws ICC filing vs Duterte

LAWYER JUDE Josue L. Sabio will withdraw the communication he filed in April 2017 before the International Criminal Court against President Rodrigo R. Duterte. Lawyer Lorenzo G. Gadon, who assisted Mr. Sabio “for moral support,” told reporters in a mobile-phone message that Mr. Sabio “did not approve what (former senator Antonio F.) Trillanes (IV) and other LP (Liberal Party) personalities have resorted to aimed at besmirching the honor of the President.” Mr. Sabio filed communication against Mr. Duterte before the ICC in April 2017. He served as the legal counsel of Edgar D. Matobato, who testified in Congress that he was part of the hit squad led by Mr. Duterte. A portion of Mr. Sabio’s letter, a copy of which was sent by Mr. Gadon, asks the ICC that the communication “be erased from the record, and that it should not be used in any way in the ongoing preliminary examination.” It also says: “I also fervently request that the legal matter pending with your office in relation to the war on drugs in the Philippines should be set aside and thrashed for being just a part of the political propaganda of Senator Trillanes, Senator de Lima, and the LP-led opposition of which I do not wish to be part of.” The Philippines withdrew from the ICC in March last year after Prosecutor Fatuo Bensouda announced in February 2018 that it will conduct preliminary examination on the alleged crimes against humanity committed by the President in connection with the war on drugs. The ICC, in a December 2018 report, said it will continue the examination of the communication they received to determine if the matter is within its jurisdiction. The international body formed under the Rome Statute tackles “serious crimes of international concern” including crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide, and crimes of aggression. — Vann Marlo M. Villegas

Zamboanga City mayor says initial P300M fund ready for new airport lot

AN INITIAL P300 million fund from the national government for the purchase of the land where the new Zamboanga City airport will be built is ready for release, Mayor Maria Isabelle Climaco-Salazar announced Tuesday. “The new airport is gaining ground, the city is awaiting downloading of P300 million first tranche for acquisition of lot,” Ms. Salazar said during her annual State of the City Address (SOCA). The site is located about 17 kilometers outside the congested city center, where the current Zamboanga International Airport is located. In Feb. 2018, during the city’s 81st charter day celebration, Finance Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III expressed support in moving the airport “to a new, more viable location.” The new airport, estimated to have a total cost of P9.9 billion, is planned as a public-private partnership project.

UTILITIES
Meanwhile, Ms. Salazar called out the water and power utilities in her SOCA to improve service delivery as the city’s economy continues to develop and investors come in. She told electricity Crown Investment Holdings, Inc. to bring “better service and fast-track what was promised” when the city government supported the investment management contract that allowed the city to take over the operations of the Zamboanga City Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Zamcelco). For water, the mayor reiterated her statement earlier this week that she wants the Zamboanga City Water District (ZCWD) to bring better service first before pushing for its proposed water rate increase. At the same time, Ms. Salazar assured ZCWD that the city government will assist in sourcing the funding requirements for the planned network improvement and expansion. The city government is undertaking several raw water supply projects such as an impounding dam. — MSJ

Duterte scraps request for Congress special session on Middle East crisis

PRESIDENT RODRIGO R. Duterte has taken back his request for Congress to call for a special session to discuss the Middle East crisis in view of the de-escalating tension between the United States and Iran, according to Presidential Spokesperson Salvador S. Panelo. “With respect to the Middle East, since there has been de-escalation of the conflict there, I suppose that is the reason why the President did not pursue with his request or call Congress to special session,” he said. The President requested lawmakers to conduct the hearing earlier this month after the US killed an Iranian general and Iran responded by launching an airstrike against a US base in Iraq. He has since directed government agencies to prepare for the repatriation of Filipinos working in the Middle East.

NAVY SHIPS
On Tuesday, Mr. Duterte rallied soldiers to “safeguard the lives of the Filipinos” as he sent off two Philippine Navy ships to the Middle East. “This is a sacred mission and it is really to safeguard the lives of the Filipino people. I tasked you this duty with a prayer and with a hope that you will carry out your mission successfully and that everybody will be safe,” he said. Navy ships BRP Davao del Sur and BRP Ramon Alcaraz are being deployed to the Middle East to assist in the repatriation of Filipinos. Last week, Presidential Adviser on Overseas Filipinos Abdullah Mamao and Environment Secretary Roy A. Cimatu, the government’s Middle East envoys, flew to the region to lead the repatriation efforts. — Gillian M. Cortez

Battling locusts

Members of the Office of the Municipal Agriculturist (OMAg) in Alabel, capital of Sarangani, conduct chemical spraying and biological control measures on Jan. 13 in parts of the upland farms of Sitio Salimama, Datal Anggas to prevent locust infestation from spreading to other areas. The OMAg representatives also coordinated with barangay officials to brief farmers and residents on dealing with the infestation that has also affected other parts of Mindanao.

Nation at a Glance — (01/15/20)

News stories from across the nation. Visit www.bworldonline.com (section: The Nation) to read more national and regional news from the Philippines.

Nation at a Glance — (01/15/20)

Big Brother is watching

George Orwell’s novel, 1984, told of a society whose citizens were under constant surveillance by the government, their daily activities monitored and their actuations and attitudes controlled, with sanctions imposed on those found guilty of independent thought. Thought Police made sure that the entire citizenry abided by government mandates and behaved accordingly.

In other words, Big Brother was watching.

Published in 1949, Orwell probably calculated that his dystopian vision was set far enough into the future (35 years) to qualify as futuristic. Perhaps the end of the millennium was too remote for him to contemplate.

Two decades into this new millennium, Orwell’s concept of Big Brother has become a virtual reality.

Of course, there have been much earlier attempts by certain governments to control their citizens in various aspects of their personal lives.

Singapore, for instance, launched an information campaign to encourage the state’s highly educated women to marry and have children early in order to improve the gene pool. Then Prime Minister Lee Kwan had noted with concern that less educated women were giving birth to more children while the highly educated ones tended to marry late — or not at all — and tended to have fewer children once married.

Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany envisioned a superior race, pairing Aryan men and women to achieve this. Hitler also tried to rid the world of the “inferior” Jews. Mercifully, he failed in both of his objectives.

In this millennium, that kind of control is being implemented through advanced technology in some countries. These days, Big Brother is not just watching, but seeks to have control over people’s lives.

That control starts with the ubiquitous smart phone which every Pedro, Juan, and Maria now possesses. These phones may be too smart for comfort.

According to techies, “when you grant an app access to your camera and microphone, you are practically giving access to your private life. The app can record you at any time the app is in the foreground, take pictures and videos and upload them without your permission, run face recognition to detect facial features or expressions, livestream the camera on to the internet, detect if you are on the phone alone or with a companion, upload random frames of the video stream to your web service and run a proper face recognition software which can find existing photos of you on the internet and create a 3D model based on your face.”

Edward Snowden, the CIA employee who blew the whistle on the National Security Agency (NSA), leaked highly classified information on the agency’s operations, including a program that captures webcam images every five minutes of the video chats of Yahoo users, storing them for future use. A certain percentage of the footages archived include “undesirable nudity.”

Snowden also revealed that the NSA can listen in on your phone calls, read your messages and e-mails, capture pictures and stream videos of you, and steal your files at will.

According to Wikipedia, “Hackers can also gain access to your device with extraordinary ease via apps, PDF files, multimedia messages, and even emojis. An application called Metasploit on the ethical hacking platform Kali uses an Adobe Reader 9 (which over 60% of users still use). The hacker can use it to open a listener (rootkit) on the user’s computer, then alter the PDF with the program, send the user the malicious file, and when the user opens it, the hacker gains total control over the device remotely. Once a user opens this PDF file, the hacker can then:

• Install whatever software/app he likes on the user’s device.

• Use a keylogger to grab all of the passwords.

• Steal all documents from the device.

• Take pictures and stream videos from the camera.

• Capture past or live audio from the microphone.

• Upload incriminating images/documents to another PC.”

Naturally, Google and Facebook know all about us, including intimate secrets which we seem to have a penchant for sharing with the world.

A documentary that I stumbled upon on YouTube and which I shared on social media focused on China, which has become one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world.

China is said to have implemented a highly advanced facial recognition system that can scan the faces of its billions of citizens and keep the information in a database.

One may recall that it did not take the London police long to identify the terrorists who bombed the tube (the city’s subway system) and a double-decker bus in 2005. This was because of the hundreds of CCTV cameras deployed all over the city.

While the omnipresent CCTVs have provided obvious benefits in identifying criminals, the system has also been used by China to pinpoint protestors in the upheavals in Hong Kong.

China monitors its citizens through the Internet, through its CCTV systems and through other digital technologies. It is said that there are currently 200 million CCTV systems in place with the number forecast to reach over 800 million this year.

And speaking of China, from her jail cell, beleaguered Senator Leila de Lima has rang alarum bells concerning a deal that the Philippine government has closed with that country.

Called the Safe Philippines Project, it reportedly will allow China to install closed-circuit TV systems in selected cities in Metro Manila — Quezon City, Marikina, Parañaque, Pasig, San Juan, and Valenzuela — and in Davao City.

De Lima believes that this will give China “an opportunity to conduct espionage operations in the Philippines” and will also jeopardize the people’s right to privacy.

Warned De Lima: “The matter of improving the country’s technological capability in the enforcement of laws must be put on a scale to strike a balance between gaining technological competence and yielding access to information from our country and our citizens.”

Department of the Interior and Local Government Secretary Eduardo Año, on the other hand, believes that the CCTV systems “improve public safety” and will be invaluable in identifying and responding to criminal activities, as well as in disaster prevention and mitigation.

I frankly think Año has a point. The CCTV systems could have a beneficial effect on peace and order and public safety.

About increased Chinese espionage activities, I don’t think there’s anything left to know about the inner workings of our government that the Chinese and the CIA do not already have easy access to.

Well, maybe the Chinese can spy on the CIA. But there shouldn’t be any doubt that the spies of both super powers have long been doing that to each other.

However, philandering husbands have reason to worry. The CCTVs could expose their extramarital activities to their wives, as well as to blackmailers.

In this regard, Philippine public officials have nothing to worry about. They parade their girlfriends and mistresses around town and even bring them on official trips.

In the Philippines, even if Big Brother is watching, he is also doing the same thing.

 

Greg B. Macabenta is an advertising and communications man shuttling between San Francisco and Manila and providing unique insights on issues from both perspectives.

gregmacabenta@hotmail.com

The Internet should hide your data, not share it

By Elaine Ou

BACK IN my days as a web developer, we did our development and testing in porn mode. Those outside the industry might refer to this as an “incognito window,” but the phrase “porn mode” is universally understood because usually no one opens an incognito window unless they’re about to load something unseemly.

I remembered that when I read Alistair Barr’s account of his attempt to delete his user data, under the auspices of California’s new Consumer Privacy Act. The process is so cumbersome — it takes more than two hours and requires uploading selfies and a photo ID — that it ends up having the opposite of the intended effect. Instead of granting consumer privacy, the act of submitting a data deletion request draws undue attention to those seeking anonymity.

This is where default options matter. If every browser window automatically opened in incognito mode, then it wouldn’t be considered incognito browsing, but regular web browsing. But if only outlaws take the time to safeguard their privacy, then privacy becomes a de facto outlaw product.

Many privacy products are already regarded this way. For example, Tor is a web browser that obscures a user’s internet activity by routing network data through a maze of relays. It’s useful if you’re a whistleblower trying to communicate with journalists, but it can also be used for illicit activity. In 2014, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network found that a majority of suspicious activity reports filed by banks involved IP addresses associated with the Tor network. Today, many financial institutions preemptively block traffic that arrives through Tor. In some cases, banks automatically freeze a Tor user’s bank account. Virtual Private Networks, which hide a user’s activity from the internet service provider, are also frequently blocked. People who go to the effort of protecting their privacy inherently seems suspicious.

But what if we saw privacy protection as akin to a form of vaccination? When we get shots to immunize against mumps or measles, we not only protect ourselves; we protect society as a whole, particularly those individuals who can’t develop immunity. Vaccination is so important that it’s opt-out, not opt-in. Similarly, defaulting to stricter privacy settings would create a safer internet not only for those who adopt them, but for those who, for whatever reason, don’t.

On the internet, data brokers collect information on as many users as possible to generate detailed profiles based on demographics and affinity groups. The more people who cut off the data brokers, the less these companies can infer about any given user. When it comes to consumer privacy protection, setting privacy as the default option protects the most vulnerable members of society.

California’s new privacy law went into effect Jan. 1, but will not be enforced until July 1. Compliance requirements are still unclear. The Wall Street Journal suggests that websites with third-party tracking must add a “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” button to their home page, a move that will likely be about as effective as placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry, or pushing the “close door” button in an elevator.

The only way anyone can really have privacy protections is if everyone has privacy protections. Privacy laws are not helpful if users can only delete their data after wading through two hours of bureaucracy. Companies that profit from massive data collection are rightly optimistic that most users won’t bother with these steps.

 

BLOOMBERG OPINION

Don’t underestimate VP Leni Robredo

Although I have met Vice-President Leni Robredo a few times, I have never had a lengthy conversation with her. Nevertheless, she has always struck me as having a strong backbone. Her uncanny ability to make bold but well-considered decisions and to stick to them was demonstrated when, after giving it a few days of thought and reflection, she accepted the Liberal Party’s left-field offer to run for vice-president. She then worked herself to the bone all over the country, and amazingly won the post and got confirmed by the Comelec. I guess her daughter had solid basis for saying that we should not underestimate their mother’s influence on their late father, Jesse Robredo, who had been my choice for next president after PNoy.

Now, having read through her ICAD Co-chair’s report on the war on drugs, I have come to the conclusion that she certainly has what it takes to be a statesman and leader of our beleaguered country. Don’t hesitate to read through the 40 pages. It has an executive summary, is thorough and well organized, and cites sources/bases for the numbers that it refers to.

The difference between Leni Robredo and Rodrigo Roa Duterte is that she is a strategic thinker, and he is a shoot-from-the-hip and gut talker. And he is not acting like a president. He seems to be just repeating himself as the tough-talking, crime-fighting mayor of Davao.

It is hard to disagree with VP Leni’s assessment of the “war on drugs.” Although she was Inter-Agency Committee on Anti-Illegal Drugs (ICAD) co-chair for only 18 days, she gathered enough information and listened to drug war partners and representatives of various government agencies, as well as civil society and international agency representatives during that time. Her consultations enabled her to arrive at a clearheaded assessment and make recommendations on what should be done to makes things better for illegal drug victims and their families and communities.

First of all, she cites many common sense insights that the current administration obviously missed. Because the “war on drugs,” led by no less than the President, was focused on “law enforcement,” it began with aggressive street-level action led by the police. Naturally, the targets were drug users and drug pushers (no distinctions seem to have been made between the two) that caused thousands of deaths by policemen and unidentified armed vigilante on motorcycles. The estimate on the number of deaths range from over 6,000 to over 20,000 depending on the source. The Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB) ran a survey in 2016 that came up with an estimate of 1.8 million drug users nationwide. The Philippine National Police (PNP) gave a figure of 4 million. The President, no less, in a speech in Laguna said it had reached 6 million. If the PNP and the President’s numbers are to be believed, the drug war has indeed failed. The next DDB survey findings are due early this year.

Some of the VP’s recommendations make a lot of sense. Operation Tokhang should be abolished. Leadership of the ICAD should be transferred to the DDB, which, under EO 15, is supposed to be the “policy-making and strategy formulating body in the planning and formulation of policies of drug prevention and control.” The current Chair of ICAD is the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) which has a narrow mandate that focuses on enforcement. A more holistic view would include prevention and rehabilitation. The administration’s emphasis on enforcement is manifest in the budget allocations under the General Appropriations Act. For 2019, the allocation for enforcement (PDEA, PNP, the National Bureau of Investigation, the Philippine Coast Guard) was P11.4 billion. For rehabilitation (the Departments of Health, and the Interior and Local Government), it was P1.24 billion.

She also cites the need for representatives of the local government unit leagues (mayors, governors, barangays) to be part of ICAD since an effective “war on drugs” should be community based. The ICAD report cites the excellent community-based example in Quezon City that promotes Community-based Rehabilitation programs. This makes sense because the Department of Health estimates that over 90% of drug users are mild users and can be rehabilitated. Moderate users are estimated at only 4-6%, and heavy users at less than 2%. Only heavy users should be detained for at least six months. Behavioral scientists I have spoken to say that rehabilitation in closed quarters do not work as well as those in open fields. I have sat in on a successful barangay level rehab program run by an NGO in cooperation with the barangay leadership and the Archdiocese of Cebu. The venue was a large garden.

The notorious Operation Tokhang which was supposed to be short for the Visayan “Tuktok Hangyo”(“knock on doors of homes with suspected drug users or pushers and try to persuade them to drop the habit”) ended up as a license to kill or arrest by the police, many of whom abused their powers. This happened because there were no clear-cut protocols on how this was to be done. And what the next steps would be.

The drug war aspect of constricting supply was set aside as a priority in favor of street level “enforcement.” This was clearly a strategic misjudgment. Based on various estimates by different sources, supply has increased, and law enforcement agencies have barely scratched the surface, having confiscated less than 1% of shabu volume estimates.

Certainly constricting supply is difficult but necessary. The President himself had publicly identified “drug lords” whom he would “kill,” include Peter Lim (missing?) and Benjamin Loot (still mayor of Daanbantayan, Cebu?). VP Leni’s sources reveal that the international sources of illegal drugs are China, Laos-Myanmar-Thailand, and the Mexico-Sinaloa cartel. It seems the top source is China. Perhaps President Duterte can whisper in the ear of his good friend Xi Jinping to help reduce their exports to our country. A little bird reminds me of the 19th Century Opium Trade during which Great Britain pressured China to allow them to sell opium sourced by them from their colony India. This opium trade is believed by some historians to have weakened the will of China’s leaders to the point of weakening their government. I am getting some really naughty ideas from this.

The VP’s ICAD report also recommends strengthening the Anti-Money Laundering Council to enable it to contribute to tracking and preventing illegal drug money from being used to continue and expand operations.

I think the President really made a “colossal blunder” in appointing VP Leni Robredo to co-chair the ICAD. He underestimated her ability to come up with a thorough assessment of the situation, and to come up with strategic and holistic recommendations on how to improve the campaign for the benefit of our people. He also blundered into enabling her to demonstrate her preparedness for the leadership of this country.

For this reason, the Presidential Electoral Tribunal should stop dilly dallying on their decision. They should just dismiss BongBong Marcos’ protest. He has already been defeated by an even larger margin in the pilot provinces chosen by him for a recount. He should just accept his defeat.

 

Teresa S. Abesamis is a former professor at the Asian Institute of Management and Fellow of the Development Academy of the Philippines.

tsabesamis0114@yahoo.com

Judges-at-Large Act: An aid to justice

To quote Former Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban: “Trial courts are the dispensers of justice closest to the poor.” But when the demand for justice is clearly disproportionate to that of the number of our judges in the lower courts, how can justice even be dispensed?

As of December 2018, the Judiciary Annual Report shows that there are 546,182 pending cases with the Regional Trial Courts (RTC) and 160,153 with the Municipal Trial Courts (MTC). These statistics are highly suggestive of possible violations to litigants’ constitutional right to the speedy disposition of cases. Yet, the opposite side of that coin is that these numbers may illustrate the problem of having a limited number of judges who are overworked and overloaded with cases pending before their salas.

In the hope of resolving the perennial problem of court congestion, and consequently, assist our judges, Senators Juan Edgardo M. Angara, Sherwin T. Gatchalian, Richard J. Gordon, and Loren B. Legarda authored Senate Bill No. 2065, under Committee Report No. 496, or the “Judges at-Large Act of 2018.”

On Aug. 30, 2019, President Rodrigo Duterte approved the said measure as Republic Act No. 11459, otherwise known as the Judges-at-Large Act of 2019, which effectively amends the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980. This was published in a newspaper of general circulation on Oct. 1, 2019.

The law creates 100 positions for RTC judges-at-large, and 50 positions for MTC judges-at-large, who shall have no permanent salas and may be “assigned by the Supreme Court as acting or assisting judges to any RTC (or MTC), respectively, in the Philippines as interest may require.” The Supreme Court shall have discretion as to the length of their temporary assignments, and after the period of their temporary assignments, the Judicial Bar Council shall recommend to the President the permanent sala to which the judge-at-large shall be appointed.

For the RTC judges-at-large, the law requires that the applicants be natural-born Filipinos, at least 35 years old, and with at least 10 years of legal practice or having held a public office requiring admission to the practice of law as an indispensable requisite. For the MTC judges-at-large, the qualifications are that applicants must be natural-born Filipinos, at least 30 years old, and with at least five years of legal practice or have held a public office requiring admission to the practice of law as an indispensable requisite.

Judges-at-large shall be entitled to salaries, privileges, allowances, emoluments, benefits, rank and title of an RTC or MTC judge. Further, they shall also be entitled to a monthly longevity pay equivalent to 5% of their monthly basic pay which shall be paid for each five years of continuous, efficient, and meritorious service rendered in the Judiciary.

While we can be certain that this legislative measure would not solve the issue of court congestion once and for all, the measure undoubtedly aids incumbent judges who carry the burden of upholding our constitutional right to the speedy disposition of cases. In effect, the law gives justice not only to those who seek it, but to those conferred with the responsibility to dispense it.

 

Shiela Vae A. Hoylar, is an Associate of the Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz Law Offices, Cebu Branch.

sahoylar@accralaw.com

New Thinking: 2020 agricultural outlook and beyond

The third quarter performance of the agricultural sector provides a glimmer of hope for the irregular growth pattern of the industry.

In the four quarters of 2018, the sector performed as follows: up by 1.47% in the first quarter; up by 0.07% in the second; it contracted by 0.83% in the third; and went up by 1.80% in the fourth quarter (Philippine Statistics Authority).

In the first quarter of 2019, it grew by 0.67% then contracted by 1.27% in the second quarter. For the most recent quarter with data, July to September 2019, the total value of agricultural production at current prices amounted to P395.3 billion. In comparison with the third quarter of 2018, the agricultural sector in terms of production grew by 2.87%.

Agricultural growth is attributed to the increases that were recorded for crops, livestock, poultry and fisheries. Crop production, which accounted for 45.19% of the total agricultural output, went up by 2.01%. While rice production decreased by 4.53%, production of corn increased by 23.47%.

Livestock production also increased by 1.63% in the third quarter of 2019, contributing 18.67% to the total agricultural output. Hog production was up by 1.96% while dairy production was also up by 6.48%.

While all poultry commodities recorded increases in production, the growth in the poultry sub-sector registered at 8.41% in the third quarter, representing a 19.44% share in the total agricultural output. Lastly, fisheries production incrementally increased by 0.56%, representing a 16.7% share in the total output.

Under a new leadership, the Department of Agriculture (DA) seeks to overcome its sickly condition. As Secretary William D. Dar expresses, such condition could be attributed to “low farm productivity; lack of labor; unaffordable and inaccessible credit; limited use of technology; limited farmland diversification; undeveloped agri-manufacturing and export; severe deforestation/land degradation; aging farmers and fisherfolk; and climate change.”

With the aforesaid challenges, Mr. Dar promotes a so-called “New Thinking” for the department. This outlook aims to double the income or earning of farmers and fisherfolks in the next five years, making them prosperous under a food secure Philippines. It also tasks the department to collectively empower the farmers and fisherfolk and the private sector in order to increase agricultural productivity and profitability, taking into account sustainability and resilience. Under “Agriculture 4.0,” farming and agribusiness would be digitized.

Specifically, Mr. Dar’s “new thinking” subsumes the following eight paradigms (Sure 8/8-Point Program) to put into place the required policies, programs, projects, and funding:

• Modernization must continue;

• Industrialization of agriculture is key;

• Promotion of exports is a necessity;

• Consolidation of small-and medium-sized farms;

• Infrastructure development would be critical;

• Higher budget and investment for Philippine agriculture;

• Legislative support is needed; and

• Roadmap development is paramount in terms of increased productivity, profitability, competitiveness, sustainability and resilience.

The said “new thinking,” however, needs to be contextualized in a risk matrix. Threats and negative conditions that continue to challenge the sector should be considered so as to make such thinking more appropriate for 2020 and beyond, and thus, sustaining the current momentum.

The first rule of thumb is devoting more resources and political support to agriculture. In particular, support services such as access to credit and irrigation services should be beefed up alongside providing direct support to research and development and information technology. These services would surely pump-prime the agricultural sector in general.

Secondly, the impact of the Rice Tariffication Law or R.A. No. 11203 should be ascertained. In as much as various claims about the adverse effects on farmers have been made since its enactment on Feb. 19, 2019, Mr. Dar pronounced the need to review its implementation while President Rodrigo R. Duterte “ordered” a temporary suspension of its implementation.

Moreover, the liberalization of rice importation sends a direct signal to other agricultural crops and livestock and poultry products sectors. Obviously, liberalizing the sugar, corn, and other agricultural products would pose serious challenges to the farmers, stakeholders, and the sector. What we need is a balanced policy that would provide clear direction for both the industry and investors. Lest we forget, pronouncements are only as good as failed promises.

Another serious challenge to the sector would obviously be the hoarders, rice cartel, and market manipulators. Their interference in the chain of supply and demand naturally necessitates government intervention, which, if not judiciously, undertaken could be more disastrous in the process.

Dovetailing Mr. Dar’s “new thinking” entails a renewed mentality to make agriculture a significant contributor, rather than dismal, to the country’s gross domestic product. Sustained agricultural growth is automatically inclusive as millions of Filipinos either directly or indirectly engage in and rely on the industry.

And, last but not the least, a good starting point is to provide sufficient funds to the Department of Agriculture. “Putting your money where your mouth is” is still the golden rule.

 

Jaime Jimenez, Ph.D, is the Deputy Executive Director for Research at the Stratbase ADR Institute.