Home Blog Page 5552

Senate urged to pass LGU tax bill 

PHILIPPINE STAR/ MICHAEL VARCAS

A CONGRESSMAN on Monday urged the Senate to pass a bill that will raise the share of local governments in national taxes to boost their autonomy. 

In a statement, Camariñes Sur Rep. Luis Raymund F. Villafuerte, Jr. said local government autonomy is the most important aspect of regional and national development. 

He added that the approval of the measure would free local governments from the “clutches of Imperial Manila” in providing essential government services. 

The House of Representatives has approved on third and final reading House Bill 10296, which will increase the share of local governments in national taxes to 50% from 40% by amending the Local Government Code of 1991. 

Two counterpart Senate bills are pending at the committee level. 

Mr. Villafuerte said passing the bill would “empower and challenge local government units (LGU) to use the additional allocation in providing better services.” — Russell Louis C. Ku 

Comelec: No expectations on when to resolve suits

THE COMMISSION on Elections (Comelec) does not expect to resolve all electoral lawsuits, including one that seeks to disqualify the only son and namesake of the late dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos, at a particular date and would take its time as needed, its spokesman said on Monday. 

“I’ve said it over and over again that it will take as long as it takes,” Comelec spokesman James B. Jimenez told reporters at an online news briefing. “We don’t have expectations on that,” he said in Filipino. 

Mr. Jimenez also declined to speculate how long the disqualification case against former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” R. Marcos, Jr., who is running for president, will drag on once it gets appealed at the Supreme Court. 

It took the high tribunal sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal five years to resolve Mr. Marcos’s election protest against Vice-President Maria Leonor G. Robredo. He lost to her by a hair in 2016.  

There are at least nine petitions seeking to disqualify Mr. Marcos from the presidential race. 

Meanwhile, the Comelec spokesman said postponing the 2022 elections to 2025 would violate the Constitution. 

The Coalition for Life and Democracy has asked the body to halt the May 2022 elections to 2025 because of a coronavirus pandemic. 

Mr. Jimenez said the year was a typographical error and the group had wanted the Comelec to defer the elections to 2023. This would still be unconstitutional, he added. 

He said the Comelec had released at least 30 resolutions to different parties and was still working on 70 more orders. He expected the body to release all resolutions by Dec. 13. 

In a related development, Mr. Jimenez said candidates for 2022 must have their social media accounts verified before they can put out political ads to ensure accountability. 

The Comelec wants to ensure that people get their information from a credible source. While a verified account could still be used to spread fake news, at least the owner could be held responsible, he added. 

He said anyone who objects to the policy could write to the commission to complain. “The people who are claiming to be disadvantaged over this, they already got verified,” he added. — Jaspearl Emerald G. Tan 

Senator seeks 1GB free data for poor 

REUTERS

POOR people should get at least a gigabyte of free data a month, a senator said on Monday as she sought the passage of a bill that seeks to lower internet rates in depressed areas. 

“Low-income end-users need more than just the occasional mobile promo, with internet access becoming a necessity just like water and electricity,” Senator Imelda “Imee” R. Marcos, who heads the Senate economic affairs committee, said in a statement.   

“Work-from-home arrangements, online education, e-commerce, and internet banking are here to stay,” she added.  

She pushed passage of Senate Bill 2102 or the Lifeline Rate for Internet Services, which will amend the Public Telecommunications Policy Act of the Philippines. 

“We are always fully supportive of initiatives that will enable us to provide telecommunication services to the general public because we know that given the rapid change and high dependence on technology in this day and age, internet access is key to economic development and poverty alleviation,” Aileen D. Regio, first vice-president and head of PLDT, Inc.’s Regulatory and Strategic Affairs, said in a mobile phone message.  

“We in fact have current plans that precisely address this need,” she added, even as she cited hurdles to their rollout in different areas of the country. 

The socialized pricing mechanism under the bill seeks to solve the slow expansion of free wi-fi access in poor areas and can already be put in place by the government and telecommunication companies, Ms. Marcos said.  

The measure is pending at a Senate committee. 

Hastings Holdings, Inc., a unit of PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund subsidiary MediaQuest Holdings, Inc., has a majority stake in BusinessWorld through the Philippine Star Group, which it controls. — Alyssa Nicole O. Tan 

DFA brings home 150 workers from Europe  

PHILIPPINE STAR/EDD GUMBAN

THE DEPARTMENT of Foreign Affairs (DFA) on Monday said the government brought home at the weekend about 150 migrant Filipino workers who got stranded in Europe. 

The workers arrived via Smartlynx Airlines Estonia, which flew from Amsterdam. Most of the passengers were seafarers, it said in a statement. 

The arrival of the workers is a first step in bringing home stranded Filipinos in Europe, Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Sarah Lou Y. Arriola said. 

DFA did not immediately respond to a WhatsApp question if any of the repatriates had come from a country where the more contagious Omicron coronavirus variant was present. 

The Filipinos are expected to undergo quarantine set by a government inter-agency task force. — Alyssa Nicole O. Tan 

 

Gov’t monitoring incoming typhoon 

THE GOVERNMENT is closely monitoring a tropical depression that could intensify into a typhoon and enter the country by Dec. 14, the presidential palace said on Monday. 

The tropical depression “will likely enter the Philippine Area of Responsibility as a severe tropical storm on the evening of Dec. 14,” Cabinet Secretary Karlo Alexei B. Nograles said in a statement, citing local weather forecasts. 

The local weather bureau on Sunday said the storm would be named Odette once it enters the Philippines. 

The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council was coordinating with regional and local councils to ensure public safety, he added. 

The Department of Social Welfare and Development has available stockpiles and standby funds for disaster response, Mr. Nograles said. — Kyle Aristophere T. Atienza 

A paradigm shift in voter thinking

FREEPIK

The upcoming fight for the Presidency will be won in the provinces, so having a strong, well-organized and funded party machinery is very crucial to deliver the message and to secure the votes to win the presidential election.

Considering present demographics, media reach, and social mind-set, serious candidates have written off key cities and the elites. Especially when one considers the limitations brought about by COVID-19… lockdowns, limited mobility, poor media reach, and funding difficulties of their political organization… the master of these key points will put any winning hand in-play.

Irrespective of the candidate, what will be needed is a message that will capture the self-interest of the masa (masses). They comprise the bulk of the votes that will make the next president.

As far as voters are concerned, past Presidential contests have been a choice between the lesser of given evils. No president, in recent times, has delivered on their promises or improved the quality of life of the common man.

The common perception is that our political leaders only enriched themselves, their family, and their close political associates.

To address the voter’s political cynicism, a candidate needs to offer something the voters can identify with to be one with the president. Presidential candidates need to impress upon the voters that they can and will improve their quality of life.

To avoid a repeat scenario of more of the same, the voters, in turn, will need to reorient their voting consideration as to who among the candidates can and will improve their quality of life within the next presidential term of office and junk their personality-based vote orientation.

Voters need to make a well-considered choice, they should transpose their personality-based vote consideration and adopt the frame of mind of an employer, interviewing applicants for the job of president. To improve on their past voter experience, voters will need to discern and choose the candidate wisely, the candidate with whom the voter will entrust the management of our country for the next six years with the goal of improving one’s quality of life.

We all need to demand better quality candidates for national leadership to be able to hope for the one that can and will bring us all to a better place. To this end, the political parties have failed us miserably — winnability is their only consideration. Country or the people’s future hasn’t crossed their minds in their selection process. The welfare of voters only comes to mind to get their vote. The next time voters will be thought of is when election season comes around again.

All the present political talk is centered around candidates’ personalities, qualifications, faults and character. They have little bearing on what a voter can expect or will get in the final analysis to sway the voters to win their support. Nothing is offered as a program commitment to extract our voters out of perpetual poverty, a deteriorating economic quagmire due to our past political leaders who have consistently put self-interest ahead of our country and its people.

As far as the masses are concerned, all politicians are the same — showman, liars, thieves. Leaders who are surrounded/supported by thieves and opportunists who will, in the end, make their lives more miserable. Feeling entitled, having supported the candidate, none of these supporters feel that they owe anything to the voters.

For as long as our presidential campaign remains to be a personality-oriented contest, the winning vote for the next president of our country will remain to be a choice between the lesser evils.

Unless our voters shift their voting consideration from a personality-driven vote to the posture of an Employer hiring an Employee Manager who is expected to deliver an improved quality of life for the voter within the next presidential term, it will just be more of the same. Their lives and misery that they now endured will just continue to be exacerbated no matter who wins the contest.

Our masa should not be short-sighted. They need to be kind to themselves. As voters, they need to see that there is something in it for themselves in order to be responsible and to make an intelligent vote. A vote to improve the economic stature of the country, themselves, and their family when hiring the next President of the Philippines for the next six years.

The next President must be able to articulate and commit to a staffing standard and qualification of people he will recruit to help him deliver his plan to mature his commitment.

Otherwise, we will end up with incompetent, do-nothing supporters who will be there only to enrich and aggrandize themselves in their new positions. If that will be the case, we can all forget the President’s commitment milestones to improve the quality of life to benefit the people.

Before a voter casts his/her vote, they must be convinced that the candidate knows the job, understands the problems of the nation, has the sincerity to make a believable commitment, the wherewithal to deliver on a clear plan that is doable to address poverty and improve the quality of life for all.

This article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or MAP.

 

Romeo G. David is a member of the MAP National Issues Committee and chair and president of BNL Management Corp.

map@map.org.ph

rgdavid2629@yahoo.com

If it’s the thought that counts, what were you thinking?

RAWPIXEL.COM-FREEPIK

The COVID-19 pandemic and the series of lockdowns that ensued have gotten most of us rethinking what we have spent money on in the past two years. However, with restrictions easing up just before Christmas, some of us have started thinking about how to spend the holidays and what gifts to get for our loved ones and colleagues. “It’s the thought that counts” is probably the most cliché statement we all know about gift-giving. But it got me thinking: what do we really think about when we make gift purchase decisions? Naturally, as a graduate student, aspiring researcher, and self-confessed nerd, I turned to peer-reviewed journal articles for answers. Here’s what I found.

You were thinking of them. Gift-giving is a prosocial behavior. According to Julian Givi and Jeff Galak in their article in the Journal of the Association for Consumer Research (2020), by spending time and money on gifts, givers are presumably acting in the best interest of their recipients. However, gift-giving is also welfare-reducing. According to Zeev Shtudiner in Economics Bulletin (2020), economists have found giving gifts in kind to be inefficient because givers don’t always know the recipients’ preferences with certainty. Thus, a gift in kind often costs more than the value that it gives to the recipient. So, if we, as gift givers, are really thinking about gifts that maximize the utility or satisfaction of the recipients, isn’t money the safest bet? And yet, some of us shy away from giving monetary gifts because it seems impersonal, maybe even tacky.

I recently gave monetary gifts to friends for various reasons and occasions. Based on our exchanges afterwards, all of them expressed appreciation for the gifts. When I asked one friend how receiving a monetary gift made her feel, she said that she didn’t think it was any less thoughtful than a gift in kind. If anything, it was more practical because it removed the guesswork from me and allowed her to decide what she needed or wanted.

You were thinking of yourself. Givi and Galak cited prior research that indicated that our gift-giving motives are not entirely altruistic. The authors’ research findings also suggested that gift givers sometimes give precedence to their desire to be unique gift givers (that is, they give gifts that other people will not think of giving) over their recipients’ preferences. In other words, we choose gifts based on how they make us look to the receivers. But do our selfish motives necessarily invalidate our gift-giving?

I don’t think that gift-giving must be altruistic to be meaningful or even thoughtful and personal. What I take away from these two articles is that we also derive satisfaction from the act of gift-giving just as the recipients of our gifts enjoy receiving them. But for those of us who are looking to give “the best gift ever,” here’s one more thing to think about.

Think about what the recipient will experience. Ines Branco-Illondo and Teresa Heath identified the properties of “best gifts ever” in their article in the Journal of Business Research (2020). The authors described the “best gift ever” as experiential, memorable, and life-changing. The “best gift ever” is described by Branco-Illondo and Heath’s informants as life-changing because it fulfilled a seemingly unattainable desire, related to a change in the giver’s or receiver’s life, and was “associated with “magical or otherwise mysterious elements.” We enjoy receiving gifts that symbolize changes in our lives.

But perhaps the key to gift-giving is to not overthink it and to just enjoy every moment—from browsing online or walking around in the stores, to wrapping them up, to exchanging gifts, to watching the receivers’ reactions, and to sharing laughter afterwards.

 

Liza Mae L. Fumar is a PhD in Business student of De La Salle University, where she also teaches Human Behavior in Organizations and Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance. Her research interests include consumer behavior and green consumption. She finds gift-giving to be delightful and stressful at the same time.

liza.fumar@dlsu.edu.ph

Tax pressure and motorcycle taxis

MACROVECTOR-FREEPIK

The Philippines’ growth scenario has somehow turned optimistic, with the belief that we can probably return to the 2019 level of Gross Domestic Product (GDP, the monetary value of all finished goods and services made within a country during a specific period) of P19.38 trillion by around the third quarter 2022. GDP size contracted to only P17.53 trillion in 2020.

Such optimism is not reflected in the government’s fiscal position because it continues to deteriorate. For instance, government borrowings per month on average were P73 billion in 2019, then shot up to P208 billion in 2020, and P247 billion until October 2021. More borrowings, higher public debt today means higher taxes tomorrow.

In 2017, the budget deficit (revenues lower than expenditures) was only P351 billion and government raised many excise taxes. Oil and coal products were among those taxed higher (see Table 1).

Tax pressure will begin in 2022 as the new administration will have to raise some existing taxes or create new ones and oil products are likely among those that will be affected. When oil prices are high, partly due to high oil taxes, many people shift to motorcycles because the oil mileage on average is three to five times better than cars. For those who are scared to drive motorcycles or ride bicycles and are in a hurry, they will take a motorcycle taxi, which is cheaper than a regular (car) taxi.

Compared to neighbors in the ASEAN, the Philippines has a modest number of registered motorcycles — 7.33 million in 2020 including tricycles, lower than eight million in 2019 probably because many motorcycle owners did not register their vehicles anymore.

The number of taxis in the Philippines has also declined from the 2013 level, probably because technology and app-based ride hailing cars have become more popular (see Table 2).

MOTORCYCLE TAXI
Currently there is no law that allows motorcycle (MC) taxis so a bill was filed, but Congress wanted data to guide them in crafting the bill. So, a pilot project was launched with three players — Joyride, Angkas, and Move It — as participants. A fourth player, Grab Philippines, was not included, with no clear reason why. The pilot project has been ongoing for almost two years already and overseen by the MC Taxi Technical Working Group (MCT TWG), composed of the Department of Transportation (DoTr), the Land Transportation Office (LTO), Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB), Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA), Philippine National Police (PNP), and Inter-Agency Council for Traffic  (I-ACT).

Meanwhile, illegal “habal-habal” motorcycle taxis freely operate in many areas of the country, especially in Mindanao, and even in Metro Manila. They exist because there is passenger demand.

Consider these three recent reports in BusinessWorld:

1. “Grab PHL, MOVE IT partner for motorcycle taxi hailing services” (Sept. 23),

2. “Transport workers allocated P10 billion for service contracts” (Nov. 22),

3. “Motorcycle taxis are here to stay,” Opinion by Enrique F. Nitura (Nov. 23).

Report No. 1 is about the entry of Grab Philippines as a fourth player in MC taxi. The Grab PHL and Move It partnership was allowed by the MCT TWG on Sept. 23, and cancelled by Oct. 1.

Report No. 2 is about the government subsidy to bus companies, mainly in Metro Manila, that give “Libreng Sakay” (free rides), also certain jeepney groups. Such a subsidy however, is not extended to regular taxis or motorcycle taxis.

Report No. 3 is an opinion by the author that one problem is an antiquated Land Transportation and Traffic Code (RA 4136, 1964) which does not consider motorcycles as public utility automobiles.

SEN. RALPH RECTO ON MOTORCYCLE TAXIS
On Oct. 11, 2020, Senate President Pro Tempore Ralph G. Recto issued a press statement arguing that “Allowing motorcyle taxis will save jobs, expand transport options without need for government bailout… one job-creating public service that will not cost the government a single centavo… one motorcycle taxi driver back on the road is one ayuda recipient off the list. And a big chunk of the cost of gas they buy are taxes that help pay for health services.”

Mr. Recto added that “stringent health and safety standards” be put in place. On the high joblessness rate, “One culprit is the lack of transportation. We’ve given too much focus on ease of doing business for corporations. We should also find ways on how there can be ease of going to work for employees.”

Amen to that, Sen. Ralph.

In a Philippine Daily Inquirer story on Dec. 8, “Motorcycle taxis in PH: Weighing convenience, safety,” it reported the following:

“In February 2020, the Technical Working Group (TWG) on motorcycle taxis said 46,713 motorcycles had been registered in the government’s initial move to allow their operations on condition of documentary and regulatory completion based on the TWG’s revised guidelines.

“… In November 2020, as COVID-19 lockdowns were eased, 10,400 riders (6,400 from Angkas and 4,000 from Joyride) were allowed to operate motorcycle taxis.

“… the Metro Manila Development Authority said an average of 86 motorcycle-related accidents occurred daily in Metro Manila in 2019. A total of 31,729 accidents were reported while 221 individuals died.”

So, a duopoly, Angkas and Joyride, has legal entity to continue motorcycle taxi operation even without legislation. Whether the duopoly provides insurance for the passengers in case of serious accidents is not clear.

THE TWG DECISION
On Dec. 10, the MCT TWG permanently terminated the Grab-Move It collaboration. It recognized that the partnership had generated jobs and served the public, but decided to stop the partnership because they had already anointed a duopoly. Move It seems to be a small third player and still training and recruiting drivers.

The TWG has ruled that the fourth player, and perhaps other future players, can come in only if the bill legalizing motorcycle taxis has become a law.

There are bad implications in this decision by the TWG.

One, they have anointed a duopoly — they allowed only Joyride and Angkas to continue operating without legislation while waiting for the final legislation.

Two, they have deprived thousands of aspiring motorcycle taxi drivers from other players the right to earn an income. As Mr. Recto said, these drivers do not aspire for even a single centavo of subsidy from taxpayers, they just want to work, legally.

Three, they have deprived thousands of passengers, people who need the speed and low fares of motorcycle taxis and who are scared or unable to drive a motorcycle even if they can afford to buy one.

Four, it creates a moral hazard problem in Congress and lobbyists for the duopoly. If Congress fails to enact the bill into a law before the elections of 2022 or after, the duopoly is protected and granted the continued privilege to operate.

THE WAY FORWARD
To avoid the four pitfalls mentioned above, the TWG should allow more players to come in while waiting for legislation. Give justice to the aspiring drivers and passengers needing more choices. Whatever safety regulations are required of the duopoly should apply to the new players. Enough of bureaucratic restrictions and prohibitions.

Congress should also hasten the legislation allowing motorcycle taxis and invite as many players to join as possible. More competition and more choices are always in favor of the passengers.

 

Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Minimal Government Thinkers.

minimalgovernment@gmail.com

New Zealand is banning tobacco. Will anyone follow?

FREEPIK

IF YOU’RE a smoker who wants to indulge your habit while gazing over the mountains of the South Pacific, you’d do well to move fast. New Zealand last week announced plans to become the first nation in the world to ban tobacco.

Prohibition won’t happen overnight. Instead, the country will raise the legal smoking age each year, so that people born after 2008 will never be allowed to puff. That will eventually mean that tobacco smoking — a practice that’s been prevalent in the Americas for thousands of years, and spread around the world after Christopher Columbus introduced it to Europe — may finally start disappearing from one corner of the planet.

This may be a taste of things to come. The Netherlands will ban supermarket sales of tobacco starting in 2024, and the Medical Journal of Australia last month called for a New Zealand-style phaseout policy in that country. One in four Americans supported a total smoking ban in a 2018 survey by Gallup.

I confess to having distinctly mixed feelings about this. Smoking kills more than 8 million people every year, making it a scourge at least on the scale of COVID-19, which has caused about 5.3 million recorded deaths over the past two years (alcohol, far more widespread, contributes to about 3 million annual deaths). That alone is reason enough to restrict the practice.

I’ve never been a smoker, but am old enough to remember the time when an evening out in my birth country, the UK, would leave your clothes stinking of tar. Thin-end-of-the-wedge arguments were trotted out before a 2007 law there banned smoking in all indoor workplaces. They came out again before a 2012 law in my current home of Australia, which mandated unbranded, and deliberately repellent, packaging for all tobacco products. In fact, both countries are far better off for the measures that have been introduced. The worst that can be said of them is that, while they’ve accelerated the decline of tobacco consumption, it’s still pretty widespread.

At the same time, we’re now at the point where the thick end of those wedges is hoving into view. If you’d suggested 14 years ago that banning smoking in pubs might ultimately lead to states prohibiting adults from undertaking activities that only harm themselves, it would have been dismissed as alarmist. But that’s what we’re looking at now. Restrictions on indoor smoking and packaging protect bystanders from passive fumes and reduce the marketing power of cigarette businesses — outcomes that serve to enhance the welfare of all individuals. Further restrictions to limit the exposures of children and fellow householders to second-hand smoking in the home and private vehicles might be justified on the same grounds, even if they would be challenging to enforce. Outright bans, however, limit the scope of choice that the generation of New Zealanders who grow into this new law will be allowed to make.

That sits oddly with the current shift toward more liberal policies on similar matters. More than half of US states have now legalized or decriminalized cannabis for recreational uses. Portugal and Oregon have even decriminalized possession of hard drugs. A referendum on legalizing cannabis only narrowly failed at New Zealand’s election last year, and another on euthanasia passed with a hefty majority.

It’s hard to justify that differential treatment on harm grounds. Cannabis use disorders are roughly as common among users as tobacco addiction is among the general population. The links between pot smoking and the respiratory, lung, and heart problems associated with cigarettes are surprisingly weak, and there’s a dearth of good quality studies that aren’t confounded by the fact that most cannabis smokers use tobacco, too. However, there are much clearer correlations between cannabis use and mental health problems including schizophrenia and psychosis, as well as educational under-attainment. Society may deem those risks an acceptable price to pay for the pain relief benefits and enjoyment that many people get from cannabis — but with the speed at which the drug is being decriminalized, there’s been precious little discussion of the issue.

The New Zealand policy won’t eradicate nicotine addiction. Vaping devices, which are used by New Zealand teenagers at a rate two to three times higher than smoked tobacco, won’t be affected. As with any prohibition, it also runs the risk of encouraging organized crime. Illegal consumption of tobacco in Australia has been slowly but surely ticking up for several years now in response to that country’s punitive tobacco tax policies, providing a steadily rising stream of black-market revenue.

What’s clear is that the current breed of tobacco control policies aren’t succeeding in bringing down voluntary smoking fast enough without harmful side-effects of their own. The very high taxes imposed in New Zealand and Australia — a 25-stick pack of Marlboro Gold at my local supermarket costs A$48.95 ($35) — don’t seem to be enough to break the power of addiction. Ultimately, they mean the underprivileged communities who still smoke at the highest rates have to pay regressive taxes on top of their other problems.* In New Zealand, for instance, smoking is far more common among the Indigenous Maori and Pacific Islander people than the general population.

That suggests a change of direction toward a limited and gradual, but ultimately more absolute measure like that being introduced in New Zealand is worthwhile, even just so the rest of the world can see whether it’s a success or a failure. Smokers themselves, few of whom feel great loyalty to their self-destructive habit, are often supportive of tobacco control policies. A 2019 survey in Sweden found former users were only slightly less in favor of such laws than the general population, while one recent study of 6,014 smokers in Pakistan found that 82% supported a complete ban.

Liberal societies will rightly seek to enhance individuals’ sovereignty over their bodies, and tread carefully when they take those freedoms away. Addictive drugs already violate that sovereignty, though, by making it physically or psychologically painful to give them up. Tobacco prohibition in New Zealand will certainly infringe on people’s freedoms. Tobacco addiction, however, has been doing that for centuries.

*Smokers in rich countries end up causing an extra burden on the public healthcare budget because of their poor health —but the brutal truth is that they also save money on public pensions, because so many die before their time.

Bloomberg Philanthropies — the foundation run by Michael Bloomberg, owner of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Opinion — has invested $1.1 billion in fighting tobacco use globally.

BLOOMBERG OPINION

What could possibly go wrong? These are the biggest economic risks for 2022

REUTERS

THE COVID years are littered with predictions that didn’t work out. For anyone looking ahead into 2022, that should be enough to give pause.

Most forecasters, including Bloomberg Economics, have as their base case a robust recovery with cooling prices and a shift away from emergency monetary-policy settings. What could go wrong? Plenty.

Omicron, sticky inflation, Fed lift-off, China’s Evergrande slump, Taiwan, a run on emerging markets, hard Brexit, a fresh euro crisis, and rising food prices in a tinder-box Middle East — all these feature in a rogues’ gallery of risks.

Some things might go better than expected too, of course. Governments may decide to keep fiscal support in place. China’s latest Five Year Plan could catalyze stronger investment. Pandemic savings might fund a global spending splurge.

Bloomberg Economics has built a new tool to model global economic risks. We used it to stress-test the world economy in 2022.

OMICRON
It’s early for a definite verdict on the omicron variant of COVID-19. Apparently more contagious than its predecessors, it may prove less deadly too. That would help the world get back to something like pre-pandemic normal — which means spending more money on services. Lockdowns and COVID caution have kept people out of gyms or restaurants, for example, and encouraged them to buy more stuff instead. A rebalancing of spending could boost global growth to 5.1% from the Bloomberg Economics base forecast of 4.7%.

But we may not get that lucky. A more contagious and deadly variant would drag on economies. Even a three-month return to the toughest 2021 restrictions — countries like the UK have already moved in that direction — could see 2022 growth slow to 4.2%.

In that scenario, demand would be weaker and the world’s supply problems would likely persist, with workers kept out of labor markets and further logistics snarl-ups. Already this month, the Chinese city of Ningbo — home to one of the world’s busiest ports—  has seen fresh lockdowns.

INFLATION THREAT
At the start of 2021, the US was forecast to end the year with 2% inflation. Instead, it’s close to 7%. In 2022, once again, the consensus expects inflation to end the year close to target levels. Another major miss is possible.

Omicron is just one potential cause. Wages, already rising at a rapid clip in the US, could climb higher. Tensions between Russia and Ukraine could send gas prices surging. With climate change bringing more disruptive weather events, food prices may continue to rise.

Not all the risks are in the same direction. A new wave of the virus could hit travel for example — dragging down oil prices. Even so, the combined impact could still be a stagflationary shock that leaves the Fed and other central banks with no easy answers.

FED RATE HIKES
Recent history, from the taper tantrum of 2013 to 2018’s stocks selloff, shows how a tightening Fed spells trouble for markets.

Adding to risks this time around are already-elevated asset prices. The S&P 500 Index is near bubble territory, and home prices accelerating away from rents suggest housing-market risks are bigger than at any time since the sub-prime crisis back in 2007.

Bloomberg Economics modeled what happens if the Fed delivered three hikes in 2022 and signaled it would keep going until rates reach 2.5%, pushing Treasury yields up and credit spreads wider. The result: a recession at the start of 2023.

FED LIFTOFF AND EMERGING MARKETS
Fed liftoff could mean a crash landing for emerging markets. Higher US rates typically boost the dollar and trigger capital outflows — and sometimes currency crises — in developing economies.

Some are more vulnerable than others. In 2013 and 2018 it was Argentina, South Africa and Turkey that suffered most. Add on Brazil and Egypt — call them the BEASTs — to get the list of five at-risk economies in 2022, based on a range of measures compiled by Bloomberg Economics.

Saudi Arabia, Russia and Taiwan, with little debt and strong current-account balances, appear least exposed to capital flight in the emerging world.

CHINA
In the third quarter of 2021, China’s economy ground to a halt. The accumulated weight of the Evergrande real estate slump, repeated Covid lockdowns and energy shortages dragged annualized economic growth down to 0.8% — way below the 6% pace to which the world has become accustomed.

While the energy crunch should ease in 2022, the other two problems may not. Beijing’s zero-Covid strategy could mean omicron lockdowns. And with demand weak and financing constrained, property construction — which drives about 25% of China’s economy — may have further to fall.

Bloomberg Economics’ base case is for China to grow 5.7% in 2022. A slowdown to 3% would send ripples around the world, leaving commodity exporters short of buyers and potentially derailing the Fed’s plans, just like the Chinese stocks crash did in 2015.

POLITICAL TURMOIL
Solidarity among leaders who back the European project, and European Central Bank (ECB) activism to keep government borrowing costs under control, helped Europe weather the COVID crisis. In the year ahead, both could fade.

A fight over the Italian presidency in January could upend the fragile coalition in Rome. France heads to the polls in April with President Emmanuel Macron facing challenges from the right. If euro-skeptics gain power in the bloc’s key economies, it could shatter the calm on European bond markets and deprive the ECB of the political support required to respond.

Say that sovereign spreads widen by 300 basis points, like they did in last decade’s debt crisis. Bloomberg Economics model shows that could chop more than 4 percent from economic output by the end of 2022, sending the euro area into recession and reviving concerns about its viability.

BREXIT IMPACT
Negotiations between the UK and EU over the Northern Ireland Protocol — a doomed attempt to square the circle of an open land border and closed customs union — are set to rumble on into 2022. Getting to yes will be tough.

What happens if negotiations break down? Based on past Brexit flare-ups, the uncertainty would hit business investment and undermine the pound, boosting inflation and eroding real incomes. In a full-on trade war, tariffs and transportation logjams could push prices even higher.

FISCAL POLICY
Governments spent heavily to support workers and businesses in the pandemic. Many now want to tighten their belts. The pull-back of public spending in 2022 will amount to some 2.5% of global gross domestic product (GDP), about five times bigger than austerity measures that slowed recoveries after the 2008 crisis, according to UBS estimates.

There are exceptions. Japan’s new government has announced another record stimulus and China’s authorities have signaled a shift to supporting the economy after a long stretch of holding the purse strings tight.

In the US, fiscal policy swung from boosting the economy to slowing it in the second quarter of 2021, according to the Brookings Institution. That’s set to continue next year, though President Joseph R.  Biden’s child-care and clean-energy investment plans will limit the drag if they make it through Congress.

FOOD PRICES AND UNREST
Hunger is a historic driver of social unrest. A combination of COVID effects and bad weather has pushed world food prices near record highs, and could keep them elevated next year.

The last food-price shock in 2011 triggered a wave of popular protests, especially in the Middle East. Many countries in the region remain exposed.

POLITICS
Any escalation between mainland China and Taiwan, from blockade to outright invasion, could draw in other world powers — including the US.

A superpower war is the worst case, but scenarios short of that include sanctions that would freeze ties between the world’s two biggest economies, and a collapse in Taiwan’s production of the semiconductors that are crucial to global output of everything from smartphones to cars.

WHAT COULD GO RIGHT?
Not every risk is to the downside. US budget policy, for example, could remain more expansionary than appears likely right now — keeping the economy away from the brink of the fiscal cliff, and boosting growth.

Globally, households are sitting on trillions of dollars of excess savings, thanks to pandemic stimulus and enforced frugality during lockdown. If that gets spent faster than expected, growth would accelerate.

In China, investments in green energy and affordable housing, already slated in the country’s 14th Five Year Plan, could amp up investment. Asia’s new trade deal, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership — which encompasses 2.3 billion people and 30% of global GDP — could boost exports.

In 2020, pandemic economies were worse than pretty much any economist had forecast. But that wasn’t true in 2021: in many countries, recoveries were surprisingly rapid. That’s a useful reminder that some things could go right next year, too. — Bloomberg

Anthony Fauci says three shots of COVID-19 vaccine is ‘optimal care’

REUTERS

WASHINGTON — Three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine is the “optimal care” but two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna vaccines or one of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine remains the US government’s official definition of fully vaccinated, top US infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci said on Sunday.

Health officials will continue to evaluate what should constitute the official designation, Mr. Fauci, who is the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and President Joseph R. Biden’s Chief Medical Advisor, said on ABC’s This Week With George Stephanopoulos.

“Well, I certainly think, George, it’s the optimal care,” Mr. Fauci said in response to being asked whether three vaccine doses could be the new standard of care.

“I mean, for official requirements, it’s still two shots of the mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna) and one shot of the J&J for the official determination of what’s required or not. But I think if you look at the data, the more and more it becomes clear that if you want to be optimally protected you really should get a booster,” he added.

It will take months to tell whether annual booster doses of the vaccine are needed, Mr. Fauci said, adding that he is hoping from an immunological standpoint that one booster dose will be enough to provide protection greater than just the six months offered by the initial vaccine. — Reuters

Taiwan says confident Chinese invasion would be very hard

REUTERS

TAIPEI — A full Chinese invasion of Taiwan with troops landed and ports and airports seized would be very difficult to achieve due to problems China would have in landing and supplying troops, Taiwan’s Defense Ministry said in its latest threat assessment.

Tensions between Taipei and Beijing, which claims the democratically-ruled island as its own territory, have risen in the past two years as China steps up military activities near Taiwan to pressure it to accept Chinese rule.

In a report to lawmakers, Taiwan’s Defense Ministry said China’s transport capacity was at present limited, it would not be able to land all its forces in one go, and would have to rely on “non-standard” roll-on, roll-off ships that would need to use port facilities and transport aircraft that would need airports.

“However, the nation’s military strongly defends ports and airports, and they will not be easy to occupy in a short time. Landing operations will face extremely high risks,” the ministry said in its report, a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters.

China’s logistics face challenges too, as any landing forces would need to be resupplied with weapons, food and medicines across the Taiwan Strait that separates the two, it added.

“The nation’s military has the advantage of the Taiwan Strait being a natural moat and can use joint intercept operations, cutting off the Communist military’s supplies, severely reducing the combat effectiveness and endurance of the landing forces.”

China would also need to keep some of its forces in reserve to prevent any foreign forces joining in to help Taiwan and to keep close watch on other fractious areas of China’s border, like with India and in the South China Sea, the ministry said.

“US and Japanese military bases are close to Taiwan, and any Chinese Communist attack would necessarily be closely monitored, plus it would need to reserve forces to prevent foreign military intervention,” it added.

“It is difficult to concentrate all its efforts on fighting with Taiwan.”

Experts say though that China has other means at its disposal to bring Taiwan to its knees short of a full out invasion, including a blockade or targeted missile attacks.

Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen is overseeing a military modernization program to make the island harder to attack, making the military more mobile and with precision weapons like longer-range missiles to take out an attacking force.

The government is planning an extra T$240 billion ($8.66 billion) over the next five years in military spending to go mostly toward naval weapons, including missiles and warships. — Reuters