DFA chief objects to qualifying of West Philippine Sea as no longer ‘disputed’
“LET’S NOT confuse people.”
This was the reply of Foreign Affairs Secretary Alan Peter S. Cayetano when asked to respond to a statement by Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio on not calling the West Philippine Sea as “disputed.”
Mr. Carpio, who formed part of the legal team of the Philippines when it challenged its claim before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague in 2016, said in an interview with ANC that the international court has already ruled in favor of the Philippines.
“It’s not called disputed before because wala pang (there was no) arbitration case. It’s called disputed because bago lang ’yung Law of the Seas, 1982. (The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea [UNCLOS] was new at the time.) And before that pa, mayroon nang dispute in two terms (there was already a dispute in two terms) ( — a) territorial dispute (and a) dispute (as) to the application of the law of UNCLOS. ’Yung (The) arbitration award deals with the 1982 UNCLOS, (which itself says) they don’t deal with territorial disputes,” Mr. Cayetano said in an interview with reporters at the House of Representatives.
Mr. Cayetano added that even if Filipinos stop using the term disputed, other countries, particularly those with their own claims in the region, and international publications will still use the word to describe the area.
“China refuses to recognize the arbitration award and there is no enforcement mechanism under UNCLOS. So what are we going to do? Magkukunwari tayo, hindi (We’ll pretend that it is not) disputed? So let’s be practical. Hindi ibig sabihin (It doesn’t mean that just) because we’re calling it disputed, it doesn’t mean we’re not saying it’s ours,” Mr. Cayetano said. — Minde Nyl R. Dela Cruz