Home Blog Page 9921

What to see this week

4 films to see on the week of June 14 — June 20, 2019

Men in Black International


IN this latest installment of the Men in Black franchise, new protagonists played by Tessa Thompson and Chris Hemsworth tackle a mole in the organization — their most global threat to date. Directed by F. Gary Gray, the film also stars Rebecca Ferguson, Emma Thompson, and Liam Neeson. The Rotten Tomatoes review aggregate site gives it a score of 31%. Rafer Guzman of Newsday says it is “A bright and breezy spin-off with two appealing stars,” while Manohla Dargis of the New York Times writes, “Nearly everything here reminds you of something else, often better, cleverer, funnier.”

MTRCB Rating: PG

The Big Trip

A STORK mistakenly delivers a baby panda to the wrong address. So a bear, a moose, a tiger and a rabbit go on an expedition to deliver the baby panda to his parents. This animated film is directed by Billy Frolick.

MTRCB Rating: PG

Teen Spirit

A STYLISH spin on the Cinderella story, teenager played by Elle Fanning joins a local singing competition in the hope of escaping her small town. Written and directed by Max Minghella, the film also stars Zlatko Buric, and Rebecca Hall. The Washington Post’s Michael O’ Sullivan writes, “Don’t expect more of Teen Spirit than the movie can deliver: It’s an unapologetically slight story about a girl with ambitions that many would call shallow. But even as it obeys the rules of the Cinderella story in many ways, it defies them in some others.” Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 72%.

MTRCB Rating: PG

Clarita

BASED on a true story, the film follows the accounts of Clarita Villanueva’s demonic possession and exorcism in 1953. Directed by Derick Cabrido, it stars Jodi Sta. Maria, Arron Villaflor, and Ricky Davao.

MTRCB Rating: R13

Which commodities contributed the most to Jan.–May 2019 inflation?

Which commodities contributed the most to Jan.–May 2019 inflation?

How PSEi member stocks performed — June 13, 2019

Here’s a quick glance at how PSEi stocks fared on Thursday, June 13, 2019.

 

MWSS water quota from Angat Dam reduced

THE National Water Resources Board (NWRB) said it has reduced its June Angat Dam water allocation for the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) to 46 cubic meters per second (CMS) from 48 CMS in May due to the continuing effects of El Niño.

In a statement, the agency also noted that it has suspended its allocation for irrigation. It did not say how long the freeze will take place.

As of 6 a.m. on June 13, Angat’s water level was at 164.02 meters, which is about 16 meters below its minimum operating level of 180 meters.

“Intermittent rains during the past few days have not significantly improved the water elevation in Angat Dam, which continues to decline daily. This is mainly due to the reduced amount of rainfall due to the weak El Niño persisting in the country,” it said.

The PAGASA weather service (the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical & Astronomical Services Administration) said that the onset of the rainy season is projected for the second or third week of June. Its forecast indicates the possibility of above-average rainfall in Luzon, including Bulacan where Angat Dam is located, which is expected to improve the dam’s water elevation.

The Angat Technical Working Group together with its concessionaires and the National Power Corp. (Napocor) are working to ensure that the 46 CMS is maintained. Other measures include tapping deep wells and cloud seeding operations.

“Based on the current situation and climate projections, there will be sufficient water supply until the onset of the rainy season. Close monitoring of the water level in Angat Dam is being done in case there will be significant deviations from the rainfall projections to minimize the impacts of the issue on water supply as well as water quality,” it said.

A Metro Manila water concession holder, Manila Water Co., Inc., said it will be required to constantly adjust operations, and raised the possibility of service interruptions.

“Given the current situation and year-end outlook, concessionaires need to constantly adjust operations which may result in service interruptions. We, however, continue to implement our rotational water supply scheme because of the supply deficit from the water shortage in March. Our situation in the east zone remains unstable and volatile,” Nestor Jeric T. Sevilla Jr., group head for corporate strategic affairs at Manila Water, told BusinessWorld in an e-mail.

The opening of the low-level outlet of Angat Dam, which has been used sparingly in the past, has also imposed uncertainties on water quality.

“There could be higher turbidity or raw water quality issues and we may have to reduce production if our plants cannot handle the poor water quality,” he said.

Maynilad Water Services, Inc. Spokesperson Jennifer C. Rufo, said that the company has been stocking up on treatment chemicals. The company has also been implementing water interruptions during off-peak hours, between 10 p.m. and 4 a.m.

“Since (the allocation is) reduced, we have to manage supply in our network,” Ms. Rufo said in a phone interview.

She added, “We might implement rotational interruption para mapag-kasya ’yung [to properly allocate] supply… Baka mangyari hindi na sya [It might not be during] off-peak.” — Vincent Mariel P. Galang

Huge funding requirement for teacher pay hikes

PRESIDENT Rodrigo R. Duterte said it may take time to honor a campaign promise to raise teachers’ salaries because there are “millions” of educators in government schools.

“Now I have doubled (soldiers’) salaries. I prioritized them. Next would be the teachers. We’re working on it — like what I have promised. But remember that there are millions of teachers,” the President said in a speech Wednesday night in Cagayan de Oro during the oath-taking of newly elected local government officials there.

He also compared the number of policemen and soldiers to teachers, saying: “There are only a few policemen, something like 160 (thousand). There are 130 (thousand) in the military. It’s easier. That is why their salaries have been doubled.”

The President’s Spokesperson Salvador S. Panelo said in a statement earlier this week that Education Secretary Leonor M. Briones reported to the President during the Cabinet meeting Monday that the teachers “are being taken care of.”

“Secretary Briones said that our teachers are being taken care of as they receive several benefits and bonuses on top of [their] minimum salary,” Mr. Panelo said.

In a briefing last week, Mr. Panelo said teachers should be patient because the government needs to find the money to increase their salaries.

“I just received [a message] from Secretary Briones, coming from the Department of Budget and Management, that for every increase of P10,000 for every teacher in this country, it will cost us P150 billion. That is why we appeal to our teachers that since this is a huge amount, medyo haba-habaan ninyo lang ang pasensiya, talagang maghahanap tayo ng pera para sa inyo,” he said.

He also said, “What is I think certain is that the President really wants to increase the salaries of the teachers.”

In a statement last month, reelectionist Senator Juan Edgardo M. Angara noted that entry-level public school teachers at present earn a monthly salary of P20,754. He said this amount is “not attractive enough” to attract “qualified and competent” teachers to work at public schools.

“Despite the fact that they are heralded as molders of our children’s future and second parents to our kids, public school teachers receive a basic salary that does not equate to their contribution,” Mr. Angara was quoted as saying.

Mr. Angara filed in 2016 Senate Bill 135 that seeks to upgrade the minimum pay of teachers to “P45,269.”

“Our teachers are considered to be the heart of the educational system. Hence, the government needs to give priority to their welfare and interests,” Mr. Angara also said. — Arjay L. Balinbin

BMW exploring parts supply network in PHL

BMW AG is exploring the possibility of ordering more auto parts from the Philippines, according to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), which will organize a business matching event to line up potential suppliers for the German automaker.

The DTI’s Board of Investments (BoI) said it will conduct on June 19 a BMW Information Session and Business Matching session in Makati City.

“The event provides an opportunity to gain insights on how a European car manufacturer sees the future of automotive, and how the Philippines positions itself amidst the fast-paced technological growth in the sector,” the DTI said in a statement Thursday.

At the event, BMW is expected to present its insights on the “New Automotive Economy” and the firm’s sourcing strategies and rules.

Asked if BMW expressed specific interest in expanding sourcing from the Philippines, Trade Secretary Ramon M. Lopez said the expression of intent was made “about a year ago when we visited their plant in Germany.”

“We made a pitch to them before. Offered auto parts and services, technicians,” Mr. Lopez said in a mobile message yesterday.

The event is seen as an opportunity for parts suppliers to attract new business and expand beyond traditional markets.

The BoI and World Bank Group have a supplier development program aimed at enabling small- and medium-sized suppliers in the automotive, electronics and aerospace sectors, particularly improving their products and processes to meet the global standards of multinational customers.

The BoI this month held an event briefing and business coaching session to prepare potential parts suppliers for the BMW meeting.

BoI Executive Director for Industry Development Services, Ma. Corazon Halili-Dichosa, said the Philippines continues to work towards strengthening research and development capabilities in the sector and be able to “engineer the next driving experience.”

Trade Secretary Ramon M. Lopez said the DTI is expecting about 50 companies to attend the event and engage with BMW.

“The focus of the sourcing activity is Filipino companies engaged in auto electronics, wiring harness, filters and some metal parts,” Mr. Lopez said in a mobile message yesterday.

“[BMW] wants to expand their current network of suppliers and they would like to explore our competencies to help them in their international production,” he added. — Janina C. Lim

Inspection of LGU-led power projects due for completion this year

THE Department of Energy (DoE) said it will complete within the year its inspection of power projects implemented by local government units (LGUs) covered by new rules allowing them to benefit financially from such projects.

In a statement Thursday, the DoE said its Electric Power Industry Management Bureau-Rural Electrification Administration and Management Division (EPIMB-REAMD) has reviewed 53 of the 72 development projects funded under the Energy Regulations (ER) No. 1-94 Program.

Under ER No. 1-94, known as the Benefits to Host Communities Program, LGUs are entitled to avail of financial benefits for hosting energy resources and energy-generating facilities.

The program provides for generating companies and energy resource developers to set aside P0.01 per kilowatt-hour of their total electricity sales as financial benefits to host communities, which are to be allocated to three types of funds: one-half of one centavo for the electrification fund of the distribution utilities; one-fourth of one centavo for the development and livelihood fund; and another one-fourth of one centavo for the reforestation, watershed management, health and/or environment enhancement fund of the host LGUs.

“The Department has been working hard to complete the close-out of ER No. 1-94 projects so that the succeeding financial benefits will benefit the host communities directly,” Energy Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi’s was quoted as saying in the statement.

He added that the direct remittance of financial benefits to host communities will lead to a considerable increase in public sector projects to be realized by host LGUs and their Distribution Utilities, which will redound to the benefit of their respective constituents and customers.

The direct remittance of financial benefits was among the major changes introduced into the new rules of the program. The move aims to cut red tape, streamlining the release of funding. — Janina C. Lim

CoA flags P74M of PDEA travel claims lacking supporting documents

THE Commission on Audit (CoA) said the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) claimed P74 million worth of domestic travel expenses and transactions in 2018 with no adequate supporting documents, representing the bulk of its travel bill for the year.

According to its 2018 annual audit report, CoA noted that PDEA had a total of P110.82 million in domestic travel expenses last year.

Of this total, eight disbursement vouchers (DVs) for airfare amounted to P9.13 million and liquidation reports (LRs) covering P13.32 million, for a total of P22,451,403.48, which were insufficiently supported by documents.

Among the documents which were not attached to the DVs and LRs were office/travel orders, approved itineraries, tickets, boarding pass, terminal fee receipts, certificates of appearance, certification by the agency head of the necessity of the expenses, and certificate of travel completed.

The state auditor also reported that 101 DVs amounting to P51.83 million were submitted for audit but were not supported with official receipts.

“The situation is not in accordance with existing laws, rules and regulations and casts doubt on the validity, existence, occurrence, and regularity of the claims,” CoA said.

CoA cited Section 4 of the Government Auditing Code, which states that any financial transactions and operations of any government agency “shall be completed with complete documentation.”

“The incomplete documentation of the transactions, aside from non-adherence to existing rules and regulations, rendered (it difficult to ascertain) the propriety, necessity, and validity of the transactions,” the auditors said.

CoA recommended that PDEA’s accountant ensure that DVs and LRs submitted for processing have complete supporting documents.

CoA also recommended that the agency’s cashier to require the claimant to submit official receipts for the received payments. — Vince Angelo C. Ferreras

PHL, Indonesia driving growth in wheat imports from US

SOUTHEAST ASIA is expected to be the top wheat importing region in 2018/2019 driven by demand from Philippines and Indonesia, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) said.

In its Grain: World Markets and Trade report, USDA said that wheat imports for the Philippines have more than doubled its demand over the last decade, with a large surge in 2018/2019.

“Wheat imports in that year were boosted by reduced supplies of other grains as typhoons cut domestic corn and rice production,” it said.

Along with the Philippines, Indonesia is also expected to drive the demand for wheat during the period. “Indonesia has more than doubled its imports in the last decade, becoming the world’s second-leading importer after Egypt. Both food and feed demand in that country have skyrocketed in recent years,” USDA noted.

This is expected to continue until 2019/2020, with the Philippines and Indonesia driving the demand. “Wheat demand in the region continues to trend higher based on longer-term shifts in consumption from rice to wheat as diets diversify,” it said.

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) said that in April 2019, the Philippine imported wheat valued at $102.04 million, down 12.2% year on year. In the first four months of the year, wheat imports rose 21.6% to $543.6 million.

Meanwhile, in a separate report for oilseeds, USDA said that copra production in 2019/2020 is expected to decline 2.8% due to lower output from the Philippines caused by stress on trees after two years of heavy nut bearing.

“Copra meal production is projected to slightly decrease due to lower copra production in the Philippines while all other countries remain unchanged,” it said.

According to PSA, coconut production in the first quarter of 2019 rose 0.2% to 3.31 million metric tons (MMT). Davao Region was the top producer, accounting for 14.4% of total production, followed by Zamboanga Peninsula (13.6%), and Northern Mindanao (12.9%). — Vincent Mariel P. Galang

Teachers’ plaint

Teaching is not about money but about public service, Education Secretary Leonor Briones told her constituents last week.

She was right — at least about the public service part.

Teaching is also a job and not volunteer work. One has to have certain qualifications to teach, in exchange for which the successful applicant correctly expects to be justly compensated. Holding a public service job that requires having a college degree and passing a government examination should mean getting paid for it. Briones and her fellow bureaucrats themselves are, at the very least, as much for the money as for the opportunity to serve the public, and it is simply not fair to expect teachers not to demand that they be paid fairly for the work they do.

Sec. Briones was nevertheless implying that teachers are in the profession only for the money. Adding insult to injury, she went on to say that the teachers of Bacoor National High School who converted a toilet rather than one of their laboratories into a faculty room did so for “dramatic” effect. Their own principal disparaged those teachers by saying they don’t need a faculty room to rest in, in apparent ignorance of the fact that such facilities are not for rest, but for providing teachers the opportunity to discuss academic issues among themselves and to learn from each other.

Sec. Briones — who, according to one media report, has taken a “hands-off” stance on the issue — was responding to questions on the demand of public school teachers for salary increases, which they’ve been asking for, and have been denied, for years. Numbering 800,000 nationally, public school teachers compose the largest group of employees in government service. But even their number and the fact that, by law, education gets the largest allocation in the budget annually have not benefited them much.

Then President Benigno Aquino III did raise through Executive Order 201 the salaries of civilian and military government employees in 2016 before his term ended. But what teachers received was only a very small 11.9 percent of their then salaries compared to the 233 percent increase in the pay of the President of the Philippines. As most Filipinos know by now, the P20,500 per month most teachers are still getting today is barely enough to support their families because of the huge increases in the inflation rate since 2017. Despite the lip service politicians paid teachers during the last mid-term elections, education is not their first priority. Keeping themselves in power is — hence policemen and soldiers are being paid twice the salaries teachers make.

Compared to 2016, the salaries teachers receive can purchase today even less of the goods and services they need to live with some dignity and freedom from worrying where to get the money for junior’s college tuition, or the hubby’s prostate operation. And yet as financially troubled as many are, some teachers provide out of their own shallow pockets the chalk, pencils, paper, and other needs of their charges that government cannot always provide, while they cope with the daily horrors of overcrowded classes, makeshift classrooms, and even the lack of such basic instructional necessities. Some teach hundreds of students in as many as three shifts a day. Others even provide their poor students the nutritious food their parents can’t afford.

Teaching may be a public service, but the compensation teachers receive is hardly commensurate to the multiplicity of tasks they are called upon to perform. Those tasks include not only teaching a multitude of subjects and being at the forefront of the national imperative of making every Filipino at least literate and numerate. They also have to entertain their superiors when these visit their schools, perform election duties every three years, and be model citizens for the entire community.

But the most crucial teacher’s task of all is that of awakening the love of and respect for learning among the young, in preparation for their assuming the roles of leaders, citizens, professionals and productive members of society. But no administration seems to have recognized this enough to provide teachers, most of whom are surviving from pay check to pay check and are heavily indebted, the salaries that that mandate demands.

Then Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte did promise to raise teachers’ salaries in 2015 when he was thinking of running for president. And he has promised it several more times since he came to power, but it hasn’t happened. Instead he’s raised the salaries of police and military personnel without any prodding, apparently, because he thinks them the guarantors of his remaining in office until 2022 — or even beyond, should plans to trash the current Constitution and to replace it with one more to his and his accomplices’ liking materialize.

In addition to teachers’ being overworked and underpaid, the police and military establishments that Mr. Duterte so obviously favors have even red-baited the biggest teachers’ organization in the Philippines, the Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT). The Director General of the Philippine National Police himself challenged ACT members to prove they’re not in a Communist Party of the Philippines “front,” and even tried to prevent their serving as members of the Board of Election Inspectors during the last elections.

The inevitable conclusion one can draw from all these is that, focused as it is on the preservation of personal, familial and class interests, like its predecessors the current regime not only has education as a last priority. Although its bureaucrats can hardly articulate that thought, teaching is also thought to be a threat because teachers preside over the first encounter with learning and knowledge of the country’s young. In the minds of this benighted country’s ruling elite, it can mean arming the next generations with such nonsense as the need for change and even revolution.

Not that that is an entirely mistaken view. As seemingly hackneyed as the cliches “Knowledge Is Power” and “The Truth Shall Set You Free” are, they do say something that all human history and experience have demonstrated is true enough. Knowledge is indeed empowering: it provides people the understanding of their political, social and economic environments that can enable them to intelligently evaluate, and if necessary change them. By providing men and women the intellectual means to shape their own destiny and the society they live in, the truth liberates them from the vagaries of chance and the shackles of ignorance.

In the 1950s, in response to McCarthyite persecution of universities in the United States, rather than deny their commitment to change, progressive academics affirmed the imperative for true higher learning to question the political, economic and social structures of their time. The capacity to do that is ideally implanted in the brains of the very young when they enter the educational system, and through the teachers who first introduce them to the world of learning, whether the ABCs, arithmetic, literature, geography or any other field of knowledge.

In their heart of hearts, the rulers of this sorry land know how dangerous to them — and to injustice, inequality, poverty and mass misery — true knowledge can be. Keeping teachers disadvantaged and indebted while pampering the police and military is only one of the ways through which they protect the unjust order that for far too long has kept them in riches and power.

 

Luis V. Teodoro is on Facebook and Twitter (@luisteodoro).

www.luisteodoro.com

MORE passenger safety and the LTFRB

Passengers and commuters want convenient, safe, and faster mobility to reach their destinations. There is great inconvenience for people who take multiple rides (tricycle, jeep or bus, MRT/LRT, jeep again to destination, reverse the process going back home). Taking a taxi is good but there are many complaints like choosy drivers, robbery, or sex molestation inside the cab, etc.

I made a small experiment, I Googled “robbery inside _____ in Philippines” for regular taxi, jeepneys, city buses and Grab. I counted the top 8 entries that refer only to my subject search, and stories like “robbery of a bank” or “taxi/jeepney accident” are not included. I was surprised by the result (see table 1).

And that explains why many people choose taking the transport network vehicle service (TNVS) or transport network companies (TNCs). Cost should not be a factor because passengers know that Grab cars are more expensive than a regular taxi but they still choose the former. It’s like parents know that Ateneo and La Salle are more expensive than other private universities but they still enroll their kids at these two schools. People value the brand, their service quality, etc.

My little experiment is consistent with the findings of a paper, “Innovation Versus Regulation: An Assessment of the Metro Manila Experience in Emerging Ridesourcing Transport Services” (2017) published in the Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 12, by Ma. Sheilah G. Napalang (UP School of Urban and Regional Planning) and Jose Regin F. Regidor (UP College of Engineering). The authors cited a study by de la Pena and Dizon (2016) on passenger preference between Grab taxi vs regular taxi (see table 2).

So if many people prefer TNVS or TNCs, how come that the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) is further bureaucratizing and even deactivating many TNVS cars and drivers?

See these three reports in BusinessWorld this week, I quote portions of the stories:

1. “Grab drivers seek amnesty for uncertified operators” (June 11):

“the process to secure a CPC is difficult for drivers to follow after the LTFRB added new requirements… produce a bank certificate of conformity… Many operators cannot comply, some banks will ask for thousands of pesos in fees, plus an increase of monthly amortization… proof of financial capability… has been increased to P50,000 from P15,000 previously”

2. “Grab calls on LTFRB to allow deactivated drivers temporarily” (June 12):

“‘The best scenario for the Filipino people, is to have more drivers which results in passenger convenience, and less traffic as car owners will just need to hail a ride… If LTRFB will allow the deactivated drivers to resume work while it processes the application of 10,000 new drivers, that would be the best win for the Filipino people,’ Grab Philippines President Brian P. Cu was quoted”

3. “LTFRB won’t ease driver norms for ride-sharing industry” (June 13):

“LTFRB said it will not ease its accreditation requirements to deal with a potential shortage of ride-share drivers, despite appeals to temporarily allow TNVS operators with pending documents to stay on the road.”

Reports #1 and #3 show that LTFRB seems to violate its own mandate — to help ensure passengers safety and convenience. Why has it imposed new strict requirements that will effectively ease out many TNVS cars that passengers precisely want?

Report #2 is true, it is basic economics. If LTFRB and passengers want lower, cheaper price per ride, just allow the supply of service to rise relative to demand. The “equilibrium point” of supply-demand dynamics will lead to a decline in price while the supply of service will increase.

The market-oriented reforms for efficiency (MORE) that LTFRB can take is to allow more TNVS cars and drivers, not reduce them. If it is more convenient, waiting time to book a ride is shorter, price or fare is lower due to competition, then more people will leave their cars at home and that will help reduce traffic.

 

Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Minimal Government Thinkers.

minimalgovernment@gmail.com

The hubris of liberal progressive ‘education’

In essence, to be simple about it: we know that human nature has worked this way for millennia, we know that human experience showed us the limitations of human intellect and comprehension, that our beings come with certain flaws and restrictions.

But let’s all set that aside and pretend.

Pretend that our intellect has developed so much further from the time of Aristotle and Aquinas. That we have now the ability to predict the infinite variety of human actions with all its possible permutations.

That, as every leftist, socialist, and totalitarian fascist believes: all human problems or sadness can be solved if only enough money and power is in their hands.

In their hands.

Anybody reading this should instantly see the insanity, not to mention the narcissistic egomania, of their thinking.

Set aside, for now, the intricate debate that gnosticism and mind/body unity that such statement implies.

Suffice for now is a paraphrase of what legal philosopher John Finnis once said on the matter of homosexual unions: “Reality is known in judgment, not in emotion. In reality, whatever the generous hopes and dreams and thoughts [will always have to give way to what is actually there].”

Or to paraphrase another, this time G. K. Chesterton: my reason is fed by my senses.

No matter how good our intention is, such will have to conform to reality.

Nothing in the world results in such tragic consequences as good intentions based on fantasy.

Millions of people have died, starved, or suffered because an idealist believed his intellect can change the world without considering what the world has to say.

Hence, why this column repeatedly warns: hell is not only paved with good intentions, it is polished, furnished, and heated with it.

Why the paucity in thought? The refusal to accept reality?

Self-entitlement is certainly a factor. That nothing stands in the way of getting what one wants.

Another is an “education” that feeds and sustains this.

That education is more apt to be filled with liberal progressive indoctrination, more to the Left than anything else.

Thus, Cass Sunstein writes: “In recent years, concern has grown over what many people see as a left-of-center political bias at colleges and universities. A few months ago, Mitchell Langbert, an associate professor of business at Brooklyn College, published a study of the political affiliations of faculty members at 51 of the 66 liberal-arts colleges ranked highest by U.S. News in 2017. The findings are eye-popping (even if they do not come as a great surprise to many people in academia).

“Democrats dominate most fields. In religion, Langbert’s survey found that the ratio of Democrats to Republicans is 70 to 1. In music, it is 33 to 1. In biology, it is 21 to 1. In philosophy, history and psychology, it is 17 to 1. In political science, it is 8 to 1.”

These numbers are genuinely disturbing, which Prof. Sunstein correctly points out, because “students are less likely to get a good education, and faculty members are likely to learn less from one another, if there is a prevailing political orthodoxy. Students and faculty might end up in a kind of information cocoon. If a political-science department consists of 24 Democrats and 2 Republicans, we have reason to doubt that students will exposed to an adequate range of views.”

And this is all the more true in “subjects like history, political science, philosophy and psychology, where the professor’s political perspective might well make a difference. (The same is true of law.)”

Such kind of closed adherence to “political orthodoxy” and “information cocoon” could produce editorials of such assured banal self-righteousness as the Philippine Daily Inquirer’s (June 9, 2019):

“Correcting imbalances in the law to protect LGBT Filipinos from discrimination, harassment and bullying, and working on the basic legal infrastructure that would ensure equality among all Filipino citizens of whatever gender orientation, are paramount at this point.

“For the Philippines to evolve into a more accepting, inclusive place, in keeping with the march of the rest of the enlightened world, it needs to pass, as a necessary step, the Sogie Bill. Because it’s already 2019. More pride, less prejudice.”

In truth, less pride and more intellectual humility is what our people deserve. Thomas Sowell puts it best:

“By encouraging, or even requiring, students to take stands where they have neither the knowledge nor the intellectual training to seriously examine complex issues, teachers promote the expression of unsubstantiated opinions, the venting of uninformed emotions, and the habit of acting on those opinions and emotions, while ignoring or dismissing opposing views, without having either the intellectual equipment or the personal experience to weigh one view against another in any serious way.”

 

Jemy Gatdula is a Senior Fellow of the Philippine Council for Foreign Relations and a Philippine Judicial Academy law lecturer for constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence.

jemygatdula@yahoo.com

www.jemygatdula.blogspot.com

facebook.com/jemy.gatdula

Twitter @jemygatdula