Home Blog Page 6097

Economic team wants LGUs to take on hospital funding

THE DEPARTMENTS of Finance and Budget and Management (DBM) said they do not support taking back budget responsibility for public hospitals, citing a Supreme Court devolution ruling that allocated more funds to local government units (LGUs).

The issue arose during a budget briefing at the Senate Wednesday, in which Senator Franklin M. Drilon noted “dozens” of pending bills aiming to “re-nationalize” several hospitals, in which the National Government once again becomes responsible for funding them instead of LGUs.

The National Government will devolve some of its functions to LGUs starting next year, mainly public services, in response to the Supreme Court Mandanas ruling, which expanded LGUs’ share of national taxes.

“This effort to address our deficit as a result of the Mandanas ruling, is not being served by the fact that there are hospitals which are now in the LGU budget,” Mr. Drilon said.

“We object to the re-nationalization,” Finance Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III told the legislators.

“There’s another solution: the different provinces can contribute to the regional hospitals in accordance with the population of their people going to that hospital,” he added.

He said LGUs can pay for their residents that are admitted to public hospitals in other provinces, cities or municipalities.

Budget Undersecretary and Officer-in-Charge Tina Rose Marie L. Canda said the DBM also rejects the re-nationalization of hospitals due to the fiscal pressures that may ensue.

“We’re not recommending re-nationalization of these hospitals as much as possible,” she added.

Senator Juan Edgardo M. Angara said the economic team should come up with a unified position on devolution plans.

Mr. Dominguez said the two state-run banks, Land Bank of the Philippines and the Development Bank of the Philippines have credit facilities to support infrastructure projects of LGUs, but they are barred by law from lending for operating expenses, and other items like the purchase of vaccines. — Beatrice M. Laforga

Pesticide residue rules planned for fruits, vegetables

REUTERS

THE DEPARTMENT of Agriculture (DA) said it plans to make labels detailing pesticide use in fruit and vegetables a permanent feature in their marketing, in order to develop awareness of safer growing practices.

At a mass labeling exercise for pesticide residue-safe fruit and vegetables at the Nueva Vizcaya Agricultural Terminal on Sept. 4, Agriculture Secretary William D. Dar directed DA High Value Crops Development Program Director U-Nichols A. Manalo and DA Region 2 Executive Director Narciso A. Edillo to draft a memorandum order for all regions to adopt pesticide labeling practices.

Mr. Dar said the order also hopes to improve research into biopesticides and organic pesticides.

“The judicious use of synthetic pesticides is a must, similar to the application of fertilizers to avoid destroying the soil. We have to be more guided by science and technology,” Mr. Dar said.

Mr. Dar also encouraged local government units (LGUs) to ensure sufficient volumes of safe food in their jurisdictions ahead of the implementation of the Mandanas ruling devolving more National Government functions to LGUs.

The ruling, set to take effect in 2022, will give LGUs a bigger share of national taxes, but also an increased role in performing functions formerly carried out at national level.

He added that the DA will only provide technical support and services, while leadership will be taken on by LGUs.

“(It is the) joint responsibility (of) the National Government and the local government to see to it that the food that we eat is safe. We are not only pushing for enough food, but also for food safety,” Mr. Dar said.

At the mass labeling exercise on Sept. 4, the DA said safety labels and certificates were awarded to farmers’ cooperatives and associations (FCA) that completed good agricultural practices training. The FCAs also met the DA’s food safety norms for residue and aflatoxin. 

FCAs engaged in vegetable growing were given biological control agents, rapid test kits, planting materials, and crates.

Mr. Dar also announced that FCAs will be priority beneficiaries of DA assistance. — Revin Mikhael D. Ochave

DENR to dismantle 370 illegal fish pens in Manila Bay rehab

PHILIPPINE STAR/EDD GUMBAN

THE DEPARTMENT of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) said that it will be demolishing 370 illegal fish pens along the Cavite shore of Manila Bay as part of the bay’s rehabilitation.

“We plan to demolish 271 illegal aquaculture structures in Cavite City; 97 in Kawit; and 2 in Noveleta. If you will notice, we don’t have plans of taking down even just one structure in Bacoor because of the mussel farms there,” DENR Spokesperson and Undersecretary Benny D. Antiporda said at a Laging Handa briefing Wednesday.

He added that the clearing activity will not affect any mussel farms operating legally.

Last month, the Manila Bay Inter-Agency Task Force announced that it will be dismantling fish pens, cages, and mussel farms without permits starting Sept. 7.

Notices to that effect were posted in Cavite City, Bacoor, Noveleta, and Kawit.

The group Pambansang Lakas ng Kilusang Mamamalakaya ng Pilipinas (Pamalakaya), an organization of small fishermen, said in a Facebook post Wednesday that the plans to dismantle were not carried out on the date indicated.

According to a Department of Agriculture administrative order issued in 2015, any person caught operating fish corrals, fish traps, fish pens, fish cages or fish ponds without a license, lease or permit will be considered prima facie to be engaging in unauthorized fishing.

He said the clearing of the illegal structures will not have an impact on small-scale fisherfolk.

“(The demolition of illegal structures) will not affect small-scale fishers who are being deprived of their right of a bountiful harvest… (However), there will be some fishers who will be affected, but they are the ones who are funded by investors… These are big companies. The investment (to establish illegal structures) is not small,” Mr. Antiporda said.

Pamalakaya has estimated that the dismantling of aquaculture farms for mussels and oysters will affect the livelihoods of some 15,000 fisherfolk and coastal residents.

“The oyster and mussel aquaculture structures which will be dismantled contribute a lot to the country’s food security and fisheries production. Compared to the buildings established at reclaimed areas in Manila Bay, the mussel and oyster structures provide livelihood and supply food to thousands,” Pamalakaya Chairman Fernando L. Hicap said in a statement issued on Sept. 6.

In a separate statement Wednesday, non-government organization Advocates of Science and Technology for the People (Agham) called on the DENR to withdraw its order to destroy fish pens and mussel and oyster farms in the Cavite area.

“DENR’s claim that these livelihood structures are a source of environmental degradation in the bay area is ridiculous. We know that the real reason behind these demolitions is to make way for a way more environmentally destructive project, the Cavite Province Land Reclamation and Development Project, which aims to create five islands located in the municipal waters of Cavite City, Kawit, Rosario and Noveleta,” the group said.

It described the DENR’s planned demolition as “inhumane and totally irrational” since this was taking place in the middle of a pandemic.

“(Many of the affected fisherfolk and coastal residents) are mussel producers. Destroying their farms will profoundly impact our shellfish supply as Cavite alone produces a third of the total mussels consumed in the country. Fishing families will also be left homeless, placing them at greater risk of contracting COVID-19 and other threats to their health,” Agham added. — Angelica Y. Yang

DA lobbies Congress for additional P30 billion in funding for 2022

THE DEPARTMENT of Agriculture (DA) is hoping for an additional P30 billion “at least” for its 2022 budget, officials said at a hearing at the House of Representatives.

“I would be happier if the budget is increased…. If the Congress can allow, we hope to have an increase of (at least) P30 billion,” Agriculture Secretary William D. Dar said before the House Committee on Appropriations Wednesday.

Mr. Dar did not specify what the P30 billion will be used for, but added that he will submit a list of projects which the additional funds will support to the committee before plenary deliberations on the proposed 2022 budget.

At a separate House briefing Tuesday, DA officials told the Committee on Agriculture and Food that the department’s overall budget proposal for 2022 was P91 billion, up 1.05% from 2021. It had originally asked for P231.7 billion before it was cut down by the Department of Budget and Management.

Magsasaka Party-list Rep. Argel Joseph T. Cabatbat, a member of both committees, said that the rejected budget proposal indicates that it does not regard agriculture as a priority next year.

“The national budget was increased by 11.5% (to P5.042 trillion) so we should (at least) expect the same increase in the department,” he said.

Mr. Cabatbat also queried why the DA had left some of its funds unspent after the Commission on Audit reported that DA had P9.8 billion in unused funds in 2020 due to failed bids, incomplete procurement documentation, and the difficulties encountered in moving projects forward due to the pandemic.

Agriculture Undersecretary Fermin D. Adriano said that the DA used 91.86% or P77.75 billion of the P84.65 billion in terms of funds actually received by the agency in 2020, leaving P6.89 billion unused as of Dec. 31.

Legislators questioned the DA Tuesday over the “disconnect” in the agency’s priorities after funding for farm-to-market roads, high-value crops, and corn was reduced in next year’s spending plan. — Russell Louis C. Ku

Fish imports seen helping address price pressures

PHILSTAR

THE GOVERNMENT should increase import volumes for fish to address supply gaps and keep food prices under control during the closed season in key fisheries, an economist said.

Karlo Fermin S. Adriano, Ateneo de Manila University Department of Economics lecturer, said in a virtual briefing Wednesday that over the short term, the government should increase the volumes covered by its certificate of necessity to import (CNI) permits.

“A solution is to amend (the) CNI to allow more imports in the fourth quarter of more than 100,000 metric tons (MT) and a total of 200,000 MT from November to March 2021,” Mr. Adriano said.

The Department of Agriculture (DA) has announced that it approved the issuance of CNIs covering 60,000 MT of fish during the closed season.

The CNIs were in effect on Sept. 2 and run until December. They cover shipments of small pelagic fish such as round scad (galunggong), mackerel, and bonito.  

According to the DA, the closed fishing season is implemented annually in the Davao Gulf (June 1 to Aug. 31), Visayan Sea (Nov. 15 to Feb. 15), Sulu Sea (Dec. 1 to March 1), and Northeast Palawan (November to January). 

Mr. Adriano said another short-term solution is to rework Fisheries Administrative Order (FAO) No. 259 allowing more parties to import fish, thereby fostering more competition.

FAO 259 sets the rules for importing frozen fish and fishery/aquatic products for wet markets during closed season or during calamities.

Mr. Adriano argued that the number of importers allowed to import is insufficient and needs to be increased.

“As of 2020, there are only 22 FAO 259 importers versus 400 to 500 importers for pork. (There is little) competition in importing fish,” Mr. Adriano said.

Meanwhile, Mr. Adriano said the government should let the market decide when to import, citing as a model Republic Act (RA) No. 11203 or the Rice Tariffication Law.

He added that the future of the fishing industry is in aquaculture due to declining fish catches globally.

“The government should focus on tilapia and milkfish because in previous studies, we have comparative advantage in these two products,” Mr. Adriano said.

Fisheries and Aquaculture Board Chairperson Lourdes R. Tanco said the long-term plan is to seek a review of RA 8550 or the Philippine Fisheries Code.

“We believe that RA 8550 should be reviewed for everything, (including in terms of) imports as a solution to food security,” Ms. Tanco said.

According to the Philippine Statistics Authority, fisheries production fell 2.4% to 1.15 million MT in the second quarter of 2021.

Of the total, aquaculture accounted for 50.9% or 585,483.59 MT.

This was followed by municipal fisheries with 25.4% or 291,623.84 MT and commercial fisheries with 23.7% or 272,244.35 MT. — Revin Mikhael D. Ochave 

CREATE-ing new tax-free transfers

It is a well-established doctrine in Philippine taxation that exemptions are construed strictly against the taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing authority. One of these exemptions is Section 40(C)(2) of the Tax Code, which allows taxpayers to pursue restructurings through tax-free exchanges (TFE).

Essentially, if the transaction qualifies as a TFE, the transfer of property is exempt from value-added tax and documentary stamp tax, while the income tax due is deferred to the subsequent disposition of the properties. Because of the deferral, the transferee inherits the cost basis of the transferor (or the “substituted basis” of property received), i.e., the original or adjusted cost of the transferor is considered the transferee’s cost basis in a subsequent transfer.

Over the years, availing of TFE benefits has been an arduous endeavor because of the need to secure confirmation from the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). To address this concern, Republic Act No. 11534 or the Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises Act (CREATE Law) amended the TFE provisions in the Tax Code with a view to making it easier for corporations to restructure and attract more investment.

CREATE-ING NEW TAX-FREE OPTIONS
Under the amended Section 40(C)(2), no gain or loss may be recognized on property exchanges pursuant to a plan of reorganization. In line with this, the CREATE Law introduced four transactions which qualify as tax-free reorganizations:

a. The acquisition of stock of another corporation in exchange solely for its stock or stock of a corporation, which is in control of the acquiring corporation, where the acquiring corporation obtains control of the other immediately after the acquisition;

b. The acquisition of substantially all of the properties of a corporation in exchange solely for its stock or stock of a corporation, which is in control of the acquiring corporation, but in determining whether the exchange is solely for stock, the assumption of liabilities will be disregarded;

c. An agreement whereby the stocks and bonds of a corporation are readjusted as to amount, income, or priority; or an arrangement of all stockholders and creditors to change and increase or decrease the capitalization and/or debts of a corporation (i.e., “recapitalization”); and

d. The formation of the same corporate business with the same assets and stockholders under a new charter (i.e., “reincorporation”).

Before the CREATE Law, TFEs covered only the following: i.e., transfers of property in exchange for shares by at most five persons obtaining control of the transferee (or transfer to a controlled corporation), and transfers pursuant to a plan of merger or consolidation — whether statutory or de facto mergers.

Notably, the new TFE transactions listed as items (a) and (b) are almost comparable to a transfer to a controlled corporation. They all involve the acquisition of shares/property in exchange for shares, and control must be achieved immediately after the transaction. However, the transfer to a controlled corporation caps the maximum number of transferors to five, while items (a) and (b) do not seem to mention any limit. Considering the above, can more than five transferors now undertake a TFE via the CREATE Law-defined reorganization? That does seem to be the case, otherwise, the law would have stated a similar restriction on the number of transferors. Also, the retention of the five-transferor rule would appear superfluous if it is just the same transaction as those newly introduced.

To date, the BIR has yet to issue guidelines to implement these new tax-free reorganizations.

CREATE-ING RESOLUTIONS TO PREVIOUS ISSUES ON TFEs
Furthermore, the CREATE Law clarified the following issues when availing of the tax-free benefit:

a. A prior ruling on the TFE is not required; and

b. A transfer to a controlled corporation qualifies as a TFE when the transferors gain collective control of the transferee.

In the past, although not required by law, securing a tax ruling became necessary, as it was a requisite for the issuance of a Certificate Authorizing Registration (CAR) for transfers involving real property or Philippine shares. To settle the matter, the CREATE Law categorically dispensed with the prior ruling requirement, and reads: “In all foregoing instances of exchange of property, prior BIR confirmation or tax ruling shall not be required for purposes of availing the tax exemption.”

Moreover, the BIR previously issued rulings stating that the tax-free benefit for TFEs applied only to the transferor who gained control through his individual capacity, while subjecting the other transferors to taxes. The CREATE Law addressed this by redefining the term “control,” i.e., taking into account the collective, and not the individual, ownership of the transferors.

CREATE-ING QUESTIONS ON IMPLEMENTATION
Given the expansion to new types of TFEs and the removal of the prior ruling requirement, the issue now is how the BIR will implement the new rules and evaluate CAR applications.

Revenue Regulations No. 5-2021 states that taxpayers are not precluded from implementing TFEs, such as securing CARs from the Revenue District Office (RDO), subject to a post-transaction audit.

While the BIR encourages TFEs during these times, questions arise on the practical application of the new provisions. For instance, will the same documents supporting requests for TFE rulings be required when applying for the CAR? Will the post-transaction audit be carried out during assessments regularly conducted by the BIR, or will this be undertaken by the One-Time Transaction (ONETT) Team that evaluated the CAR applications? It also seems questionable to still audit a transaction after a CAR, which is essentially a tax clearance, is issued.

Likewise, the review of TFEs is effectively relegated from the BIR National Office to the RDOs having jurisdiction over the property transferred. Without the implementing guidelines, the RDOs may have differing interpretations on which transfers qualify as TFEs.

These concerns, along with the uncertainty brought about by the pandemic, may give taxpayers cause to hesitate pursuing restructuring. Nonetheless, this author remains optimistic that the spark ignited by the CREATE Law on TFEs will result in the BIR’s issuance of clarifications soon. Expanding the coverage of TFEs and streamlining the process of availing of its tax-free benefits are positive developments, as these will encourage corporations to undertake reorganizations. In turn, these may help establish sustainable business models and achieve economies of scale, which may ultimately attract more investment.

The views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Isla Lipana & Co. The content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for specific advice.

 

Bon Yannicka M. Chua is a Senior Consultant at the Tax Services Department of Isla Lipana & Co., the Philippine member firm of the PwC network.

+63 (2) 8845-2728

bon.yannicka.x.chua@pwc.com

Wait, we still need microfinance

FREEPIK

A lot of research has examined the impact of Microfinance on the betterment of peoples’ lives. Studies are conflicting; from a developmental perspective, the access to finance of course has positive benefits to the general economy. Any improvement in capital markets reaching the margins is a good thing. But when we look at individual, personal studies, it is half and half and debates are aplenty. There are some success stories and case studies of Microentrepreneurs using the funding to create a business or product, some are even award-winning. Many video interviews highlighting the improvement in their personal lives. But for every success story we see, we do not see those who did not succeed; those who used the funding for a product or service that simply did not fly, who are unable to meet the debt repayments, and have found themselves even deeper in debt than when they first started.

And if Microfinance is so successful, why does it continue to exist? It is counter-intuitive, but if such institutions have truly helped lift people out of poverty, should these people not already be integrated into the formal banking system, such that they would no longer need to be microfinance clients? Why are they staying on as clients indefinitely? The answer to this, is that Microfinance has a long way to go, at least in the Philippines. And there is still a need for it.

I spoke to Bong Roxas, head of Rizal Microbank, casually over a Zoom call, on that point. Just to understand what’s going on on the ground, especially during the pandemic. He says unlike other traditional banks, their onus is not simply to provide funds, but actually to take care of their clients. They not only have a personal relationship with clients that entails better customer service; no, the relationship is an intimate one. They know about their family situations, the dire situations they are in, as well as every little triumph in their lives. There is constant communication. And during COVID, more so. Microbanks have a more pressing need to extend relief measures, because if they do not, they literally would lose all their clients. And so, Bong says that they have not just extended relief, rather, they have over-extended their relief measures.

But what of the interest rates, I asked. Why, after so many years, are these rates still exceptionally high when you look at it on an absolute level (around 45% per annum), and Bong says it is quite simply the cost of funds. There is difficulty in accessing funds from NGOs or multilateral organizations who provide cheaper funding — the funds have dried up and they need to tap expensive sources, which inevitably get passed on to clients, so the interest rate is out of their control.

What then, can be done to improve the system? First of all, we agreed we could do a major revamp the credit scoring method. I wondered whether credit scoring even still works in this day and age of COVID when past performance no longer has anything to do with current performance (I touched upon this in my column a couple of weeks ago for traditional banks). Could we use more psychometrics instead? Could we look at other indicators instead of the usual historical performance, repayment rate, guarantors or collateral? Bong says yes, we could look for instance at savings behaviors, longevity as client, and other such indicators to calibrate interest rates. A second way to improve the industry if we cannot bring down the cost of funding, is to at least try and bring down the cost of operating. And a lot of the operating costs are hinged on access to reliable data, having efficiency in encoding personal information, and vetting and understanding a client’s background without having to spend so much time and resources. A very easy way to do this he says is, of course, with the Universal ID system. If there could be one reliable source of identification information then the costs of verifying identification for security would be slashed dramatically. Not to mention the increase in clients that can now apply should they have such an ID. And another is, having an open finance framework. Let’s share client information! Let’s share their spending, saving, and paying habits. They do this now in many other industries, where data is open, which benefits everyone and allows customers to have more competitive options.

Finally, Bong says, digitization is of course, front and center. Not just access to a mobile phone for those in far-flung areas, but the true digitization of the inner workings of a Microfinance institution. Digitizing the way to get client information, to have all this information in an app, on everyone’s fingertips not only makes things more efficient, eventually translating to a cost benefit, but specifically improves transparency and gives the clients more power and control of their finances, making them a stronger, better economic agent and ultimately strengthening the balance sheet of the Microbank.

Despite the criticisms, despite the burgeoning of fintechs, we still do need Microfinance, because we need more than just banks providing financial aid to the needy; we need an intimate relationship that goes beyond credit scoring, we need a mentality of care and custodianship, not simply customer satisfaction. We need to service those who are marginalized even by the digital revolution. And we need to stay the course, because when there are a lot of improvements that still need to be done and actually can be done, the only way is forward.

 

Daniela “Danie” Luz Laurel is a business journalist and anchor-producer of BusinessWorld Live on One News, formerly Bloomberg TV Philippines. Prior to this, she was a permanent professor of Finance at IÉSEG School of Management in Paris and maintains teaching affiliations at IÉSEG and the Ateneo School of Government. She has also worked as an investment banker in The Netherlands. Ms. Laurel holds a Ph.D. in Management Engineering with concentrations in Finance and Accounting from the Politecnico di Milano in Italy and an MBA from the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.

Confusion reigns

PHILIPPINE STAR/ MICHAEL VARCAS
STAFF FROM Quezon City’s Barangay Socorro set up a tent for monitoring a compound placed under a Special Concern lockdown after a number of COVID cases were recorded there. — PHILIPPINE STAR/ MICHAEL VARCAS

I passed by my sports club on Tuesday to pay my monthly bill. While there, I also inquired if the club’s sports and dining facilities would reopen even partially once Metro Manila reverted to General Community Quarantine (GCQ) starting Sept. 8, as announced. The reply to me was that despite a call to authorities that morning for clarification, the matter remained unclear.

By late Tuesday, government officials announced that Metro Manila would instead keep the stricter MECQ status until Sept. 15, despite previous days’ declaration that the looser GCQ would apply from Sept. 8 onwards. Given the last-minute flip-flop on quarantine status, I don’t blame my sports club as well as local authorities for being confused. Who wouldn’t be?

I can imagine similar confusion, and perhaps frustration, on the part of businesses that have no choice but to wait and follow government pronouncements as they plan their daily operations. I’ve read a number of comments on social media on how many businesses have already recalled staff and restocked inventory in preparation for reopening. All for naught, it seems.

To be told very late in the day that it would be no-go for them until Sept. 15 at least, was like kicking a man down as he tried to get up from his sick bed. Businesses, more so small and medium, are all struggling. Many are barely surviving. Even big exporters are having a hard time due to a surge in shipping charges, among other reasons. Flip-flops just worsen their situation.

Corporate planning and budgeting used to be done annually, and in line with strategic objectives. But now, everything is on corporate triage, with the sole aim of surviving the next month, or the next quarter. The assignment of degrees of urgency determines the order by which things are done or paid for. Budgets are realigned to prioritize workers’ health and business continuity.

These are the realities that we all have to live with now, unfortunately. In my case, as a business consultant, I have been waiting on a number of reports from various sources, as needed by my clients. But, with the ECQ since Aug. 6, and then MECQ since Aug. 21, many public and private offices have only skeletal workforce in place. Reports are not a priority for them now.

I can understand why the government opted to keep the MECQ status quo. With the number of COVID-19 cases still on an upward trajectory, perhaps it is best to remain prudent and retain the lockdown for at least another week. However, from days back they already knew the trajectory. Why then even raise the possibility of GCQ by Sept. 8 when it was still unlikely?

God gave us two ears, one mouth, and a big brain between those ears. These are perfect proportions as they allow us to listen more, talk less, and, presumably, efficiently process whatever it is that we hear before we even open our mouths to speak. In this particular case of the GCQ announcement, however, obviously the government spoke too soon.

And this is where the communication process needs to be improved. There shouldn’t be any second-guessing, and people should be given clear, concise, and correct information that can be relied on as credible and certain. Indecisiveness and uncertainty have their price in our present predicament. To businesses, it can mean losses. But for people, it can mean poverty and loss of lives.

Triage has become a practical tool at work and at home to determine priorities, and the allocation of resources. But even the dissemination of information to the public can undergo some form of triage. The early assignment of degrees of urgency determines the order and timing by which information is conveyed.

Clarity of message comes only from clarity of thought. What is not clear in one’s head will not come out clearly from one’s mouth. If the government itself is confused, then the people will also be confused. We need better coordination and planning of government initiatives and pronouncements, and better processing of how to best communicate them and when.

When people make mistakes, they suffer the consequences of their mistakes. They can also be made accountable and liable for their mistakes. But when the government makes a mistake, even in communication, then everybody suffers. And, rarely will a government admit its mistake. The government is right, even when it is wrong.

Greater economic losses and hardship can arise from vacillation, hesitation, and the inability to efficiently processes statistics and scientific data. Well-informed choices come from good and timely research, and efficient synthesis of quality information. But, crucial to all this is timing of dissemination. Good intelligence and analysis are useful only when used and distributed timely. Otherwise, such information all become history. Today’s newspaper is tomorrow’s fish wrapper.

People need to be able to rely on their governments to do what it is in their best interest, in a timely manner. They should also be able to relay on government information as factual, honest, and credible. Otherwise, it will all be about getting any information that they can come by, from any source. And in this digital era of fake news, deep fakes, and misinformation, this can be very dangerous.

 

Marvin Tort is a former managing editor of BusinessWorld, and a former chairman of the Philippine Press Council

matort@yahoo.com

What makes elections genuine?

TUMISU - PIXABAY

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is considered a milestone document in the history of human rights. The UDHR was crafted by “representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world. The document was proclaimed by the United Nations general assembly in Paris on Dec. 10, 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected.”

The proclamation goes on to express the following clauses in its preamble, portions of which we quote:

“Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

“Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people.”

The United Nations, the main driver behind the UDHR, was established on Oct. 24, 1945 in San Francisco, California, USA, less than 60 days after the generally regarded official end of World War II on Oct. 2, 1945.

The fact that the US and its allies, mainly the United Kingdom and France, won the war, automatically meant that history would be written from their collective perspective. That point of view revolved around freedom and respect for human dignity. The then USSR, an ally of the western powers in the war against Nazi Germany in Europe and Japan in Asia, was forced to take the backseat in the formation of the UN. Whatever political ideology the Soviets advocated was thus lost in the process of forming the UN.

Expectedly, what prevailed were Judaeo-Christian values with no principles of Communism, Stalinism, Nazism, Leninism, or any other non-democratic tenets influencing the principles of the victors and even indirectly condemning autocracy and one-man rule. This fact becomes very obvious when one considers Article 21 of the Declaration, to which the Philippines was a signatory:

“Article 21

1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or indirectly through freely chosen representatives

“2. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country

“3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.”

Item three of Article 21 says a mouthful about the essence of democracy — consent of the governed. The UDHR affirms the sacred principle that all government or state authority emanates from the people. All power comes from the people especially if one considers the Greek etymology of the word “democracy”: “demos” stands for people while “kratis” is power. In short, democracy is people power.

If indeed power comes from the people, then it is their consent that is the only thing you need to legitimize one’s exercise of power and authority over the governed. Article 21 tells us that this consent is expressed by way of periodic and genuine elections through secret vote or some equivalent free voting procedures.

A question now arises. What makes an election genuine? We have no problem with the periodic part of the election process. From our vantage point, an election is genuine when a truly independent constitutional body tasked to manage and administer the elections does its functions according to the spirit and the letter of the law. By spirit of the law, we mean being mindful of the original intent of the law. Elections should be viewed as the mechanism available to the community to select its officers who will exercise their powers to protect the welfare of the community. It is the process used in a representative democracy.

And this is where our situation as we think of the 2022 synchronized elections becomes a bit tricky. Voices of congress, the judiciary, the legal profession, and even some sectors of media have been strangely muted, by and large over the years, regarding electoral reform except those of IT practitioners and good governance advocates like Dr. Rene Azurin, author of the paper “Elections as an Instrument of Political Control”; Dr. Nelson Celis, spokesman of the Automated Election System (AES) Watch and IT columnist of a broadsheet; Augusto Lagman, former IBM Philippines executive, former COMELEC commissioner and incumbent national chairman of the National Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL).

The point of view of these three civic activists and the UP Center for People Empowerment and Governance (CenPEG) expressed through Azurin and a 642-page, CenPEG study on automated elections, surfaces another dimension of automated elections versus manual counting at the precinct level:

Azurin says there should be “manual counting at the precinct level (which is transparent to all watchers), coupled with immediate electronic transmission (with digital signatures) of precinct results simultaneously to the national canvassing center, to all the major media outlets, and to a secure public website. The correctness of transmitted precinct results and the accuracy of the tally can be instantly verified by everyone through the public website. Results can then still be known within 12 hours. This makes dagdag bawas [adding and subtracting] almost impossible. As long as there is electronic voting and counting, the process is not transparent and there will always be room for electronic magic.”

Good doses of forthrightness will be useful.

 

Philip Ella Juico’s areas of interest include the protection and promotion of democracy, free markets, sustainable development, social responsibility and sports as a tool for social development. He obtained his doctorate in business at De La Salle University. Dr. Juico served as Secretary of Agrarian Reform during the Corazon C. Aquino administration.

Boxing and unboxing

FREEPIK

Boxes are a part of life. We put things in them (boxing) as well as take things out (unboxing).

“Unboxing” is also a digital event featuring the filming of new gadgets being taken out of their boxes for evaluation and review by tech gurus. The progressive revelation of a desirable object through the peeling away of covers has always offered a titillating pleasure even in some other settings — Okay, let’s not go there.

Boxing has also become a political event. A recent loss in this sport can have political consequences. Previous declarations that a win in this arena would bump up political chances need to be tested. Does a boxer move the needle of survey results with a loss? Maybe not.

Boxing lends itself too closely to political rhetoric such as: fighting for the prize, slugging it out for a win, and staying in the ring to withstand a flurry of attacks. In real life though, the skills set for winning (or losing) a match in the arena are altogether different from those required in mastering the politics of power.

Boxes have also become part of the vocabulary of management.

Exhortations to “think out of the box” require throwing away old-fashioned solutions and adopting bold approaches. “Stepping out of the box” is a favorite mantra of consultants. After all, if everybody is comfortable with current practices, is there a need for outsiders to offer 10 ways to think out of the box?

Planning sessions with consultants have an exercise precisely to get people out of the mental rut they have traveled too predictably before. Exercises in creativity (think of 25 uses for a paper clip) are supposed to unlock the right side of the brain. This parlor game allows blue-sky, off-the-wall, and out-of-the-box thinking. The facilitator nonchalantly lists down even the weirdest ideas. (Don’t laugh, that’s good — cheese holder; bra fastener, toothpick; fake beard…  what else can a paper clip be used for? Temporarily holding pieces of paper together…anybody else?)

Organizations consign jobs to boxes in the table of organization. The traditional hierarchical structure is depicted as an array of boxes connected by lines, both solid and dotted, to denote reporting relationships or the flow of information and decision-making. Boxes define the boundaries of power to avoid redundancies and overlaps. Turf wars are fought on the size and position of boxes.

The phrase “out of the box” is based on a puzzle designed by the British mathematician, Henry Ernest Dudenay to connect nine dots to form a box by crossing all the dots, without lifting pencil from paper or backtracking on any lines. The solution involves drawing beyond the nine dots to complete the puzzle. Extending the line outside is a creative way to connect the dots.

Even when there was no stated requirement to stay within the space of the nine dots, most of those tested did not think of venturing out of bounds — unless they had encountered this puzzle before.

There is only one rule for out-of-the-box thinking: if it is not impossible, then it is considered possible. Even defying the laws of gravity was achieved with the invention of the plane. Sometimes, traditional rules are broken when a new crisis arises— like reporting to the office for work. Remember that old practice?

In computer software terms, however, an application “out of the box” is one that is readily available to install without further modification. This other meaning ironically refers to a routine approach. It is off-the-rack and ready-to-wear. It is the default setting that requires no further tinkering.

A maverick posture does not always contribute to team play. Being “out of the box” can also mean being unhinged, out of whack, the odd man out, undisciplined, a cowboy going off by himself into the sunset. (Are we on the same page here?)

Recent news unboxed the once unthinkable prospect of the incumbent number one going for the position of number two. This idea was quickly put back in the box the following day as a breach of good manners. Will it stay in the box? We just have to wait and see.

Opening a closed box has its risks. When the mythical Pandora opened the box (or vase) she wasn’t supposed to, she released misery, illness, and plagues. And when the box was closed back, it locked in… the last gift of hope.

 

Tony Samson is Chairman and CEO of TOUCH xda

ar.samson@yahoo.com

Biden says he is sure China will try to work out deal with Afghanistan

US PRESIDENT Joseph R. Biden is seen in this file photo. — REUTERS

WASHINGTON — US President Joseph R. Biden said on Tuesday he was certain China would try to work out an arrangement with the Taliban after the Islamic insurgents seized power in Afghanistan on Aug. 15.

Asked if he was worried that China would fund the group, which is sanctioned under US law, Mr. Biden told reporters, “China has a real problem with the Taliban. So they’re going to try to work out some arrangement with the Taliban, I’m sure. As does Pakistan, as does Russia, as does Iran. They’re all trying to figure out what do they do now.”

The United States and its Group of Seven allies have agreed to coordinate their response to the Taliban, and Washington has blocked the Taliban’s access to Afghanistan’s reserves, most of which are held by the New York Federal Reserve, to ensure they live up to their pledges to respect women’s rights and international law.

But experts say much of that economic leverage will be lost if China, Russia or other countries provide funds to the Taliban.

Italy, current president of the Group of 20 (G20) major economies — which include China and Russia — has been trying to set up a virtual G20 meeting on Afghanistan, but no date has been announced, suggesting discord among the group.

Chinese State Councillor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi told US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in a phone call on Aug. 29 that the international community should engage with the Taliban and “positively guide” them.

China has not officially recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan’s new rulers, but Mr. Wang in July hosted Mullah Baradar, who has since been appointed as deputy prime minister, and has said the world should guide and support the country as it transitions to a new government instead of putting more pressure on it.  Reuters

Reopen schools or disaster looms, experts tell Indian authorities

REUTERS

NEW DELHI — Many top Indian epidemiologists and social scientists are urging authorities to reopen in-person school classes for all age groups, saying the benefits outweigh the risks especially as poor rural children are missing out on online education.

The recommendation comes as experts say another coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave in India this year could be far less deadly, because a dramatic rise in cases in April and May means a big majority of the population have been infected already, while more than half of its adults have been at least partly vaccinated.

India last month approved its first COVID-19 shot for people under 18, though as of now only adults are being immunized.

As new infections have stabilized around 40,000 a day in the past few weeks, some Indian states have restarted face-to-face teaching, mainly for middle school and above. Experts say that is not enough.

“Schools are an essential service. It has been wisely said that they should be the last to close and the first to reopen,” said a report released on Monday on school education by a group of scholars, including economist and social scientist Jean Dreze, that warned of a “looming disaster.”

“In India, the opposite has been happening: soon after the COVID-19 crisis struck in early 2020, all schools were closed without batting an eyelid and most of them are still closed today.”

The health and education ministries did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The federal government has largely left it to states to decide when to reopen schools.

NO EDUCATION
An August survey of nearly 1,400 school children done by the scholars’ group found that in rural areas, only 8% were studying online regularly, 37% were not studying at all, and about half were unable to read more than a few words. Most parents wanted schools to reopen as soon as possible, it said.

The reasons were that many children did not have their own smartphone, mobile connectivity was poor, they did not have the money to pay for mobile internet, schools were not sending study material or online education was too hard to grasp for some.

The Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine, whose roughly 6,000 members are doctors who have studied epidemiology, told the government in a report it was safe to resume all offline classes after taking precautions such as improved ventilation, physical distancing and masking.

Epidemiologists also say that as India’s last serological survey estimated that more than half of the country’s population of 6-17 years had already been infected, without any particular severity, there was no reason to worry that a future wave will specifically target the unvaccinated ones among them.

“The risk of moderate to severe disease in children is really low and vaccination is not a prerequisite,” said epidemiologist and public health expert Chandrakant Lahariya.

“Therefore, I believe that the technical experts should not rush to recommend vaccination of adolescents in India. The focus has to continue to be on achieving high coverage for all adult age groups,” he said in an e-mail.

India has administered 701.9 million vaccine doses — at least one dose in 57% of its 944 million adults and two doses in 17%. India reported 31,222 new COVID-19 cases on Tuesday, taking the total to 33.1 million. Daily deaths rose by 290 to 441,042. — Reuters