On Tuesday, at the Asian Institute of Management in Makati, we launched something historic: the Integrity Chain. It is the world’s first private sector-led blockchain initiative dedicated to ensuring transparency in government budgets. More than 50 presidents and leaders of respected business, academe, civic, and faith-based organizations signed the Statement of Support, joining the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) as it became the first agency to commit its Foreign Aid Projects to the chain.
At the ceremony, DPWH Secretary Vince Dizon declared his agency’s commitment to transparency and accountability. The Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) secretary, Henry Aguda, likewise expressed support, recognizing the alignment of this initiative with the administration’s push for digital transformation and good governance.
The presence of these leaders, combined with the active participation of over 50 organizations, underscored a shared message: integrity cannot be delayed, outsourced, or left solely to the government. It must be built, enforced, and validated by all sectors of society — and technology now allows us to do so.
Over the past weeks, I have read and heard criticisms against blockchain-related bills filed in the Senate and Congress. Detractors have been quick to dismiss these proposals as premature, unnecessary, or misguided. But here is the real question: if we do not try, if we do not test, if we do not innovate, then what is the alternative? Endless whining and complaining will not clean up corruption. Passing judgment before consultation even begins is not only unfair but also counterproductive. Our legislators deserve the chance to engage stakeholders, refine their proposals, and explore how emerging technologies like blockchain can serve the Filipino people. Instead of criticizing, why not propose solutions? Why not enrich the debate with constructive input rather than blanket dismissals? It is easy to attack an idea. It is harder — but more meaningful — to help shape it into something workable.
This was the spirit that led us to launch the Integrity Chain. Rather than wait for government to act, the private sector banded together to build a platform that demonstrates how blockchain can safeguard transparency. On its technical level, the Integrity Chain is simple. By placing DPWH’s Foreign Aid Project budgets on the blockchain, every peso spent is immutably recorded, visible to auditors, civil society, and the public. This eliminates the possibility of tampering and makes “ghost projects” nearly impossible. Each entry is permanent, unalterable, and auditable in real time.
But what makes the Integrity Chain different from other blockchain initiatives is not the technology. It is the People Chain that powers it. More than 50 organizations — chambers of commerce, universities, civic groups, and professional associations — signed on to become validators of these budget transactions. Each organization serves as an independent eye, a moral compass, and a public witness to ensure that what is recorded on the chain reflects the truth. Critics often say, “Technology cannot solve a people problem.” They are right. Corruption is not simply a technical failure — it is a moral one. But this is exactly what the Integrity Chain addresses. It is not only blockchain; it is people checking on people. It is collective vigilance embedded into the system itself.
C.S. Lewis once wrote: “Integrity is doing the right thing even when no one is watching.” This has become one of the most quoted lines on ethics and morality. But on that day, standing in a room with more than 50 organizational leaders and two Cabinet Secretaries, I realized that integrity gains another dimension in our time. In the age of transparency, integrity becomes unbreakable when everyone is watching. This is the promise of the Integrity Chain. It transforms integrity from a private virtue into a public system. It does not replace conscience, but it supports conscience with technology, validation, and scrutiny. It does not eliminate the role of individuals, but it strengthens them through collective oversight.
Skeptics may ask: why is the private sector doing this? Shouldn’t integrity be the job of government? Yes, but here lies the problem: government alone cannot solve corruption. Bureaucracy is often slow, and internal checks can be compromised. By contrast, a private-sector collective can act faster, innovate quicker, and, most importantly, check on each other to avoid conflicts of interest. This is not to replace government, but to complement it. By starting with DPWH’s Foreign Aid Projects, we send a signal: the private sector is not merely complaining about corruption, it is offering a solution. And by doing so, we help the government regain credibility in the eyes of the people.
The launch was also significant because it was the first initiative of its kind in the world. Other countries have experimented with blockchain pilots in budgeting or procurement, but nowhere else has the private sector itself convened, designed, and committed to validating government projects on-chain. This makes the Philippines a pioneer. In an era where headlines often portray our country as lagging behind in governance and innovation, the Integrity Chain tells a different story: here, in Makati, we set a global example.
Of course, challenges remain. Technology is only as strong as the will to use it properly. The governance structure for the Integrity Chain will need to be defined. Roles must be clarified. Resources must be sustained. But Tuesday’s signing showed that the will is there. In the coming weeks, we will reconvene the founding organizations to form a governance team that will oversee implementation, assign responsibilities, and ensure continuity. From there, we hope to expand beyond the DPWH, so that other agencies and budgets can also be placed on the chain. The road will not be easy. But then again, fighting corruption has never been easy. What makes this moment different is that now, we are not just fighting with words — we are building with systems.
The Integrity Chain is not perfect. It is not the final answer to corruption. But it is a start — a bold one. And in a country where cynicism often paralyzes reform, a start is exactly what we need. So, to those who criticize blockchain bills and reform initiatives, I say: stop dismissing, start contributing. Instead of asking “why blockchain,” ask “how can we make blockchain work for transparency?” Instead of assuming technology cannot solve human problems, ask how technology and people together can reinforce integrity.
On Tuesday, we showed what is possible when the government, the private sector, and civil society stand together. The Integrity Chain is not just a piece of technology. It is a commitment, a covenant, a collective act of conscience. It is, above all, a People Chain — a movement where integrity is no longer optional, and accountability is no longer invisible.
C.S. Lewis was right: integrity is doing the right thing when no one is watching. But in Makati on Tuesday, we proved something new: integrity becomes unbreakable when everyone is watching.
Dr. Donald Lim is the founding president of the Blockchain Council of the Philippines and the lead convenor of the Philippine Blockchain Week. He is also the Asian anchor of FintechTV.
