Home Blog Page 11629

Upcycle project gains headway

SO IT can actively participate in the efforts to reduce pollution and conserve the nation’s resources, the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), through its Field Office VII, has partnered with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the local government of Siquijor to implement the “Kwarta sa Basura” project which aims to upcycle solid waste and turn it to usable materials that can be a source of livelihood for poor families in Barangays Caticugan and Dumanjug in the island province. Family beneficiaries of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) were able to construct their own Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) to collect garbage and other residual wastes in their community that can be used to upcycle reusable materials such as plastic bottles and cellophane. According to Cheryl Jumamil, a Pantawid Pamilya partner-beneficiary from Brgy. Caticugan, “Dili lang sa economic aspect kini makatabang sa among mga benepisyaryo, paagi usab kini sa pag-minos sa problema sa basura aron mapreserbar ang atong kalikopan (This project would not only help us beneficiaries economically but also helps address the reduction of trash leading to the preservation of our environment).” Ms. Jumamil revealed that she was able to initially earn P20,000 out from selling wallets made from upcycled materials. Other partner-beneficiaries were also able to sell flower lanterns made of 1.5-liter soft drink plastic bottles and other products such as bags, lanterns, and rugs from discarded materials.

Corporate tax take least efficient among ASEAN peers despite high rates, Finance department says

THE GOVERNMENT’S collection efficiency for corporate tax was by far the worst in comparison with three other emerging economies in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), despite having the highest tax rates, the Department of Finance (DoF) said.

At a corporate income tax (CIT) rate of 30%, the DoF said that the government’s collection efficiency is only 12%, or equivalent to 3.7% of gross domestic product (GDP).

Collection efficiency is actual collections against GDP, divided by the corporate tax rate.

“We have the classic problem of a high rate but narrow base. That is why the efficiency is problematic,” Finance Undersecretary Karl Kendrick T. Chua was quoted in a statement as saying.

The DoF said that there are about 360 laws — 150 investment laws and 210 non-investment laws — that grant tax breaks to businesses.

This compares with Thailand’s 30.5% efficiency, with collections generating 6.1% of GDP, at a corporate tax rate of 20%.

Vietnam meanwhile recorded 29.2% efficiency, raising 7.3% of GDP, at a 25% corporate tax rate.

Malaysia’s 27.1% efficiency rate produces collections equivalent to 6.5% of GDP, off a 24% corporate tax rate.

“Despite a 30% rate, we are at the bottom in terms of revenue efficiency,” Mr. Chua said.

The DoF is preparing to submit to the House of Representatives the second package of the comprehensive tax reform program that seeks to reduce the corporate tax rate to 25% this month.

The package will also seek to rationalize incentives for companies, making them “performance-based, targeted, time-bound, and transparent,” Mr. Chua said.

“Through this proposal, the government will be able to ensure that incentives granted to businesses generate jobs, stimulate the economy in the countryside  and promote research and development; contain sunset provisions so that tax perks do not last forever; and are reported so the government can determine the magnitude of their costs and benefits to the economy,” the DoF said.

Under the Philippine tax code, all corporations, unless receiving fiscal incentives, have to pay a regular tax rate of 30% or a minimum of 2% of gross income beginning the fourth taxable year immediately following the year in which a corporation commenced its business operations, when the minimum income tax is greater than the regular tax.

The DoF said that the second package will be “revenue-neutral,” as the cut in corporate tax rates will be compensated by the withdrawal of some incentives granted by investment promotion agencies (IPAs).

Republic Act No. 10708, or the Tax Incentives Management and Transparency Act (TIMTA), has allowed the government to identify the companies receiving the biggest incentives and their impact on the economy.

The TIMTA study shows that among the country’s 13 IPAs, the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) accounts for the bulk of the incentives, followed by the Board of Investments.

Among incentives that the PEZA grants include a 100% exemption from corporate income tax, tax and duty-free importation of raw materials, exemption from wharfage dues, and all local government imposts, on top of non-fiscal incentives. — Elijah Joseph C. Tubayan

Trump would welcome challenge from Oprah for US president

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE — US President Donald J. Trump would gladly face Oprah Winfrey as an opponent in the 2020 presidential race, a White House spokesman said on Monday after social media buzz from her speech at an awards show thrust her name into the political arena.

“We welcome the challenge, whether it be Oprah Winfrey or anybody else,” Hogan Gidley told reporters on Air Force One during a flight to Nashville on Monday. “We welcome all comers.”

Ms. Winfrey, 63, stole the show at the Golden Globe awards on Sunday night with her speech upon receiving the Cecil B. DeMille award for achievement and lit up Twitter with a surge of tweets carrying “#Oprahforpresident” and “#Oprah2020.”

She is actively thinking about a run, CNN reported on Monday, citing two of her close friends. CNN did not name the friends, who it said had spoken on condition of anonymity. At least one emphasized that Ms. Winfrey had made no firm decision.

Ms. Winfrey has said in the past she is not interested in running for president, but the Los Angeles Times quoted Stedman Graham, Ms. Winfrey’s longtime partner in business and life, as saying on Sunday that, “It’s up to the people … She would absolutely do it.”

Wearing a black gown to show support for victims, she used her platform to promote the “Time’s Up” movement against sexual harassment and assault, throwing her support behind others who have exposed sexual misconduct in Hollywood and elsewhere in politics and the media.

“She had that room in her hands. It was like a campaign rally,” said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a senior fellow at the University of Southern California’s Price School of Public Policy.

The nine-minute speech generated two standing ovations from the Hollywood glitterati and prompted 220,000 posts on social media mentioning the words “Oprah” and “president” in just 24 hours, said Todd Grossman of social media analytics company Talkwalker.

After Mr. Trump won the White House in 2016 with help from his fame as a reality TV star, it no longer seems far-fetched to consider a similar campaign by Ms. Winfrey, an actress, movie and television producer, and chief executive of her OWN cable channel, political analysts said.

Ms. Winfrey, long associated with Democratic politics and fundraising, would likely face a crowded field in the Democratic primaries in the 2020 race.

But given her connections, Ms. Winfrey might have a fund-raising advantage over her rivals in liberal Hollywood, which is often called an automatic teller machine for Democratic candidates.

“She’s certainly a bigger celebrity than Trump ever was, especially in terms of connecting with her audience. Obviously this has given her an opportunity. What does she do next with it?” said Alan Schroeder, a journalism professor at Northeastern University in Boston who has written on the intersection of show business and politics.

Mr. Trump benefited from his star power to win more free media exposure than his rivals in the Republican primary and was able to run a relatively inexpensive campaign.

His committee spent $343 million in the primary and general election campaigns with the help of $47.5 million of the real estate developer’s own money, which he lent to the campaign and later forgave.

Hillary Clinton, his Democratic opponent, spent $585 million including $1.5 million of her own money.

Ms. Winfrey could supplement any campaign with her own wealth. Forbes estimates she is worth $3.0 billion compared to $3.5 billion for Mr. Trump. She was raised in poverty by a single mother and went on to host the top-rated talk show The Oprah Winfrey Show for 25 years before ending it in 2011.

Ms. Jeffe, the USC professor, cautioned against thinking of Hollywood as a monolith of liberal Democrats. Besides the liberal creative talent, Hollywood money also comes from the more conservative, unionized trade and craft work force as well as from the business interests.

“She has credibility with all of them,” Ms. Jeffe said. — Reuters

Abra holds international motocross competition

THE much-awaited Congressman JB Bernos International Freestyle Motocross will be held on Jan. 27-28 at the Namagpagan Motocross Track, Poblacion, La Paz, Abra.

In its seventh year, the competition promotes motocross tourism in the country with 12 race categories plus the freestyle exhibition.

“Every year, we invite big stars of freestyle motocross, such as international riders from America. This year, we will bring the top freestyle riders of the world,” said SELJ SPORTS President and Hari ng Motocross Jay Lacnit, the partner of Bernos in the event.

International freestyle riders who are coming to the Philippines include Tom Robinson, Harry Bink, Steve Mini, Scott Fitzgerald, Blake Bilko Williams, and Emma Mcferran. Legendary celebrity riders Jack McNeice, Corey Creed, and Denis Stapleton will also grace the competition.

“All our kababayan here in La Paz look forward to this grand tournament. We are proud to bring sports motocross tourism in the Philippines,” said Congressman JB Bernos.

Mayor Ching Bernos also expressed pride that Abra has been a big fan of motocross because of the event.

Relevance of Shakespeare to the state of the nation

WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE’S work is timeless in its themes and universal in its approach — such that one of his earliest and greatest works appears as if written especially for Filipinos.

Richard III (believed to have been written in 1592), is one of The Bard’s most famous tragic works, depicting the rise to power of Richard, duke of Gloucester, a ruthless man haunted by his hunched back and ugliness.

Shakespeare depicts Richard as a cunning, entitled, misogynist bully — a monster determined to steal the crown of England by hiring assassins to murder his brother, King Edward IV.

But Richard’s Machiavellian triumph did not happen overnight nor was it due to his effortless alone — he had the help of many enablers. In a modern setting, it can be likened to an election (a particularly bloody one).

“Shakespeare’s Richard III asks: what enables a tyrant to stay in power? We ask the same question in the context of contemporary Philippine politics, drawing from characters and scenes in Shakespeare’s play,” Ricardo Abad, a sociologist and professor emeritus at the Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU), told BusinessWorld in a text message.

Mr. Abad, together with playwright Anton Juan, brings Richard III from page to the stage in a production entitled RD3RD (an obvious allusion to President Rodrigo Roa Duterte’s moniker, Du30). Presented by ADMU’s Arete Production, in cooperation with Tanghalang Ateneo and Ateneo Fine Arts, the play will have performances starting Jan. 11 at the Fine Arts Black Box Theater at the ADMU campus in Quezon City.

Mr. Abad is also the artistic director of the university’s Arete Creativity and Innovation Hub.

The play, which encourages Filipino viewers not to remain collective silent watchers of sociopolitical events in the country, is a timely piece that also parallels the current political climate in the US.

In 2016, The New York Times ran an opinion piece, “Shakespeare Explains the 2016 Election” by Stephen Greenblatt who warned his readers not to stay silent or waste their votes and watch a personification of Richard III claim power. The story was published in October, which was a little too late because a month later, Donald Trump won the US presidency.

Judy Ick, the adaptation’s dramaturg, said in a Facebook post that RD3RD was the result of a collaboration between the two directors and her, and was created from the Shakespearean text and the aforementioned New York Times op-ed which she “revised and revised again and again.”

“I felt that this story had to be told, that this Shakespearean play had to be re-angled to reveal our contemporary truths. The time is ripe for an English history play in our own history because now is the winter of our discontent,” she explained.

Mr. Abad said: “the play comments on the present administration and focuses, particularly, on the war on drugs and the EJK issue. Some scenes also refer to Filipinos who voted for him, but it’s not the central issue of the play.”

He explained that the focus lies on the five “enablers who support, wittingly or unwittingly, a ruler’s rise to power” or the naïve, the forgetful, the terrorized, the opportunistic and a fifth that the audience will learn from watching the play.

“There may be other types [of enablers] but we limit ourselves to those revealed by Shakespeare’s text,” Mr. Abad, who also acts as the play’s narrator, said.

Mr. Abad is no stranger to adapting Shakespeare — his Sintang Dalisay, a Filipino adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, has won several awards here and abroad and is the most-staged and internationally toured Shakespearean play in our history.

“Much of my work in sociology and Shakespeare over the past 25 years or so has revolved around the theme of social inequality. RD3RD falls under the same umbrella. What makes RD3RD unique is the immediacy of its message, the common political conviction of cast and crew,” he said on the play’s Facebook page.

RD3RD’s ensemble includes Ron Capinding, Joseph de la Cruz, Katski Flores, Teroy Guzman, Judy Ick, Cholo Ledesma, Itos Ledesma, Missy Maramara, Gold Soon, Jay Valencia-Glorioso, and Jamie Wilson.

Asked what the audience should take away from the production, Mr. Abad said: “I suppose I would like [the] audiences to be more aware that there’s more to leadership than the mission-vision-practice of a single person. And if people refuse to take a stand against brutal policies, then that refusal allows a nefarious system to thrive.”

For co-director Mr. Juan, humanity lies at the core of a society’s rituals, which ought to be expressed in our words, performances, and beliefs.

“It is in these times [that] our rituals should speak out even more urgently to the world. To question the indifference of those who watch, to understand and put to light the terror, the disbelief of many who think these killings are necessary, to reflect on our own inhumanity in accepting ‘the necessary means to an end,’” the playwright and professor at the Department of Film, Television, and Theater Arts in University of Notre-Dame-du-lac, USA said on Facebook.

RD3RD is a nonprofit artists’ initiative which will be staged at the Ateneo De Manila and is the Philippine representative to the Festival of Shakespearean plays which is part of the Asian Shakespeare Association Conference in Manila in May.

Reserve tickets at https://tinyurl.com/RD3RDTicketsNickky Faustine P. de Guzman

The 2018 National Budget, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth

The government slogan “Build, build, build!” resonates for many, especially those who have some grounding on economic growth theories. In a serious attempt to address the country’s decrepit infrastructure, the administration decided to pour in funds for “hard infrastructure” and implement projects that are physically necessary to facilitate trade and improve the country’s business climate.

The primacy of infrastructure development is very evident in the national budget for 2018 given the lofty sum apportioned to the sector. In his budget message in July 2017, President Duterte himself said that there was P1.097 trillion ($22.03 billion) to be allocated for infrastructure development in 2018. This is nearly one-third of the total 2018 national budget. To illustrate, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) will receive the largest departmental allocation in the 2018 national budget. DPWH, given its infrastructure development programs, will get P637.86 billion ($12.8 billion) — even surpassing the P553.3 billion budget of the Department of Education (DepEd), which usually receives the highest allocation among all government agencies. This is equivalent to 16.9% of the country’s total 2018 budget and is higher by 40.3% from the previous year’s budget. This budget will primarily be available for the construction, rehabilitation, and improvement of transportation infrastructure and flood control systems.

In addition, the Department of Transportation (DoTr) has been provided with P66.3 billion ($1.33 billion). This is a 24.4% increase in its annual budget compared to its allocation in 2017. In line with its mandate, the DoTr budget should allow for the provision of a safe, affordable, and comfortable public transportation system, especially big-ticket railway projects.

Then there is the P10-billion ($201 million) budget — predominantly allotted for infrastructure projects — to support the rebuilding and rehabilitation of Marawi, which has been shattered by a catastrophic siege that has resulted in severe human and physical damage.

Several studies on the growth of national economies show how transport infrastructure improvements (including road networks, airports, railways, ports, and logistics) have led to increased trade flows. Infrastructure, particularly information and communications technology (ICT), also strengthens trade, as the density in numbers of telephone lines, mobile phones, broadband access, Internet users, and secure Internet servers have a positive impact on trade for both exporters and importers.

Relatedly, it has been shown that, in lower-income countries, domestic revenue collections have a positive effect on firm performance, which could be channeled into the financing of public infrastructures that are vital to firms. Indeed, it has also been revealed in studies that tax revenue resources had a positive effect on infrastructure development. These studies recommend that the government should provide the necessary human and material infrastructure that are needed to support seamless tax collection so increased revenues can really enhance development.

Note that the National Budget for 2018 is intimately tied to the Comprehensive Tax Reform Package (CTRP) being nurtured by the government. The recently signed Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Law, the first package of the CTRP, seeks to lower personal income tax rates, limits value-added tax exemptions, introduces tax administration measures and raises excise taxes on several commodities, while generating the requisite funds for infrastructure spending, education, health and other social safety nets. This is seen as crucial for sustaining long-term economic growth.

While the government’s goals sound very rational and sensible, serious governance-related concerns remain.

For one, there is a need for vigilance in ensuring that the government is more prudent in spending its budget, and more importantly, that the actual budget allocated is being used in the programs as designed. It would be helpful indeed if investing in infrastructure translates to improving the flow of the economy and thereby the mitigation of price increases and additional levies for everyone. Unfortunately, as it stands, key infrastructure agencies have yet to unlock the solution to addressing public spending bottlenecks. There is also a continuing need for additional measures by government in ensuring that taxpayers do not avoid and evade taxation so enough revenues can be tapped for the economy. Authorities responsible for taxation should be strengthened and made more accountable in enforcing compliance by taxpayers.

It is only in this end that the national budget may be more fully and concretely seen as a real tool for national development.

Otherwise, for many Filipinos, especially the regular Juan and Juana, whose immediate concerns are about the daily sustenance of their families, this “Build, build, build!” slogan would only be an empty promise.

 

Louie C. Montemar is a Fellow of Stratbase ADR Institute.

From Reagan to Trump, and maybe Oprah, American celebrity politicians abound

WASHINGTON — Talk show queen Oprah Winfrey’s impassioned Golden Globes speech triggered speculation about her political future.

A 2020 presidential race between Oprah and Donald J. Trump, himself a TV titan, would be the celebrity-political battle of the millennium, made for — and by — television.

But they are by no means the first American screen stars to throw their hats in the political ring. Here are some notable standouts.

THE GREAT COMMUNICATOR
Prior to Trump, there was Ronald Reagan, the celebrity who achieved the greatest success in politics. Mr. Reagan earned notoriety as an actor in films like Knute Rockne, All American, in which he starred as football player George “The Gipper” Gipp.

He identified first as a Democrat but switched parties in the 1950s.

Elected twice as president of the Screen Actors Guild, the charismatic Mr. Reagan became California’s Republican governor in 1967, and won a landslide presidential victory in 1980 against Jimmy Carter.

OTHER HOLLYWOOD STARS
Mr. Reagan paved the way for several other silver-screened politicians, most notably Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The former Mr. Universe bodybuilder and star of the Terminator movies followed Mr. Reagan’s path to political stardom by becoming governor of California in 2003. But Mr. Schwarzenegger was born in Austria, meaning he could never serve as president.

Fred Thompson, who had roles in Die Hard 2 and The Hunt for Red October, parlayed his celebrity into a political career, serving as a Republican in the US Senate from 1994 to 2003. He ran unsuccessfully for president in 2008, and returned to acting.

Actor-filmmaker Clint Eastwood, star of Hang ‘Em High and director of Million Dollar Baby, has been involved in political issues for decades. From 1986 to 1988, he served as mayor of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California.

THE WRESTLER
Perhaps the most colorful television personality to enter US politics is Jesse “The Body” Ventura, a former Navy SEAL who became a popular bad-boy wrestler in the World Wrestling Federation, watched by millions in the 1970s and 80s.

His joke candidacy for governor of Minnesota in 1998 gained traction as he pushed a populist platform.

Seen as a precursor to Mr. Trump’s wild win in 2016, Minnesota voters sent a message to business-as-usual politicians, narrowly electing the bombastic wrestler.

Today, professional wrestling has made it to the White House. Linda McMahon, the ex-chief executive of WWE and a former Senate candidate herself, now heads the Small Business Administration under Mr. Trump.

TALK AND REALITY SHOW STARS
Jerry Springer became host of a tabloid-themed talk show in the 1990s, after serving as mayor of Cincinnati for a year from 1977. Mr. Springer also mulled runs for US Senate in 2000 and 2004, but did not formally enter the race.

Reality TV star Sean Duffy, a cast-member on MTV’s The Real World: Boston, is currently a Republican congressman from Wisconsin.

Sonny Bono and his pop-star wife Cher scored a huge television hit with 1970s variety program The Sonny & Cher Show. Mr. Bono served three years in the House of Representatives in the 1990s.

TV COMEDIANS
Late-night comedy sketch show Saturday Night Live has skewered American politics for decades, but it also produced a political star. Comedy actor Al Franken narrowly won a US Senate seat in 2008, only to resign last week following multiple accusations of sexual misconduct.

Two other television comedies produced members of Congress: Ben Jones, who played Cooter in good ol’ boy 1980s show The Dukes of Hazzard, and Fred Grandy of The Love Boat fame. — AFP

Military denies NPA claim on gov’t casualties

ASIDE FROM intensified clashes on the ground, the military and the rebels here have been fighting over the number of soldiers killed by rebel attacks during the last week of 2017. The military, through Maj. Gen. Noel Clement, commander of the 10th Infantry Division, denied the rebels’ claim that 26 soldiers were killed during a series of encounters in the Davao Region just a week before new year. He said the military “does not hide its casualties and always states facts based on results of the encounters.” “That is purely a propaganda statement to project an imagined strength of this terrorist organization,” he added as his rebuttal to Rigoberto Sanchez, spokesperson of the New People’s Army (NPA) in Southern Mindanao. Mr. Sanchez claimed the soldiers were killed during the defensive tactical operations of the rebels while both were implementing their respective cease-fire. “The tactical offensives against the rabid reactionary armed forces serve to underscore the growing demand to overthrow Rodrigo Duterte from power” said Mr. Sanchez. He identified the encounter sites as those in the areas of Davao Oriental and Compostela Valley. — Carmelito Q. Francisco

PSE extends suspension on trading of PAL shares

THE Philippine Stock Exchange has approved PAL Holdings, Inc.’s request to extend its trading suspension until Jan. 11, to give the company more time to file the necessary disclosures in relation to its planned quasi-reorganization.

“The present request for extension of trading suspension is made in order to allow the company to make the necessary disclosures requested by the Exchange in relation to the number of the Corporation’s issued and outstanding shares resulting from the amendments of the par value of its shares and the issuance of new shares,” the company said.

The extended trading suspension will run from Jan. 10 to 11.

PAL Holdings, which operates flag-carrier Philippine Airlines, initially sought for a voluntary trading suspension from Jan. 3 to 9, in line with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval to decrease PAL Holdings’ authorized capital stock to P13.5 billion from P30 billion, resulting from the decrease in par value of each share to 45 centavos from P1. 

The SEC further approved the increase in par value of each share to P1 from 45 centavos, as a result of the decrease in the number of shares corresponding to the authorized and subscribed capital stock of the company.

The company also secured approval for the valuation of shares for a proposed share-swap transaction with Zuma Holdings and Management Corp. The transaction will allow PAL to issue 19 shares for each Zuma share surrendered.

With this, PAL Holdings will issue a total of 1.65 billion shares from its authorized but unissued capital stock to Cosmic Holdings Corp. and Horizon Global Investments Ltd., which own 60% and 40% of Zuma, respectively.

Zuma is the majority owner of Air Philippines Corp., which is an affiliate of PAL Holdings.

PAL Holdings’ capital restructuring looks to clean up the company’s balance sheet, as it seeks the entry of a new investor group. The company announced as early as 2014 that it is talking with potential investors to help manage its fleet.

The company swung to a net loss of P4.95 billion in the first three quarters of 2017, from a P2.55 billion net profit recorded in the same period in 2016. Revenues, meanwhile, climbed by 16% to P98.6 billion during the same period.

PAL Holdings’ last trading price was at P5.15 per share, recorded last Dec. 29, 2017. — Arra B. Francia

Nissan’s new technology: mind controls car

NISSAN Motors has chosen the CES 2018 trade show — ongoing until Jan. 12 in Las Vegas, Nevada — to demonstrate a technology that will enable vehicles to interpret signals from the driver’s brain, redefining how people interact with their cars.

The car maker said its Brain-to-Vehicle (B2V) technology, the latest development in the Nissan Intelligent Mobility program, “promises to speed up reaction times for drivers and will lead to cars that keep adapting to make driving more enjoyable.”

Nissan said the technology is the result of research on brain decoding technology. By catching signs that the driver’s brain is about to initiate a movement — like turning the steering wheel or pressing the accelerator — the system is able to predict and assist in the action more quickly. The technology can also detect and evaluate when the driver is not comfortable over the vehicle’s behavior when it’s set to autonomous mode, and will alter driving style accordingly.

“When most people think about autonomous driving, they have a very impersonal vision of the future, where humans relinquish control to the machines. Yet B2V technology does the opposite by using signals from their own brain to make the drive even more exciting and enjoyable,” said Daniele Schillaci, an executive vice-president at Nissan.

Other possible uses include adjusting the vehicle’s internal environment, said Lucian Gheorghe, senior innovation researcher at the Nissan Research Center in Japan, who’s leading the B2V research. He cited the technology can use augmented reality to adjust what the driver sees and create a more relaxing environment.

The car maker explained B2V calls for the driver to wear a device that measures brain wave activity. This is then analyzed by autonomous systems that can react 0.2 seconds to 0.5 seconds faster than the driver.

A concert played in complete darkness

EXPERIENCE a concert in total darkness as the Goethe-Institut Philippinen brings renowned German musicians in a concert entitled, Concert in the Dark on Jan. 17 at the University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman.

Andreas Martin Hofmeir on the tuba and Barbara Schmelz on the piano will perform pieces from different composers around Europe in a program dubbed the “European Journey.”

The repertoire includes classics by Schubert, Schumann and Wagner.

Concert in the Dark is part of a series of musical engagements organized by the Goethe-Institut in Southeast Asia called anders hören or “listen differently.” This annual offering is meant to introduce the audiences in the region to not-so-common forms of appreciating music.

A professor at the Universität Mozarteum Salzburg (University of Music and the Performing Arts Mozarteum Salzburg), Mr. Hofmeir founded the popular Bavarian band LaBrassBanda and is a multiple award-winning cabaret performer.

He is a sought-after soloist and chamber musician and has given master classes all over the world. In 2004 he won the prestigious “Città di Porcia” International Tuba Competition and until 2008 was the solo tubist of the Bruckner-Orchester Linz under the baton of Dennis Russell Davies.

Meanwhile, Ms. Schmelz is a renowned product of the Universität Mozarteum.

Salzburg and the Royal Academy of Music in Copenhagen.

She heads the established concert series Musiktage Waging and is currently working as regional cantor in the church music department of the Diocese of Passau.

Her broad musical spectrum ranges from concertante and liturgical organ playing to singing, choir and conducting to improvisation, whereby the connection of music and liturgy plays an emphasized role.

Concert in the Dark is on Jan. 17, 7 p.m. at the Aldaba Recital Hall of UP Diliman.

Admission to the concert is free on a first-come-first-served basis. For more information, go to Goethe.de/Manila.

North Korea to send team to Winter Games

SEOUL — North Korea said during rare talks with the South on Tuesday it would send a delegation to the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics in South Korea next month and Seoul said it was prepared to lift some sanctions temporarily so the visit could take place.

At the first formal talks with South Korea in more than two years, North Korean officials said their delegation to the Games would consist of athletes, high-ranking officials and a cheering squad.

The talks are being closely watched by world leaders eager for any sign of a reduction in tension on the Korean peninsula, amid rising fears over North Korea’s missile launches and development of nuclear weapons in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions.

South Korea has unilaterally banned several North Korean officials from entry in response to Pyongyang’s ramped-up missile and nuclear tests, held despite international pressure.

However, some South Korean officials have said they see the Olympics as a possible opportunity for easing tension.

Foreign ministry spokesman Roh Kyu-deok said Seoul would consider whether it needed to take “prior steps,” together with the UN Security Council and other relevant countries, to help the North Koreans visit for the Olympics.

At Tuesday’s talks, the first since December 2015, Seoul proposed inter-Korean military discussions to reduce tension on the peninsula and a reunion of family members in time for February’s Lunar New Year holiday, South Korea’s vice unification minister Chun Hae-sung said.

The North has finished technical work to restore a military hot line with South Korea, he added, with normal communications set to resume on Wednesday. But Mr. Chun did not immediately say what information would be transferred along the hot line.

The North severed communications in February 2016, following the South’s decision to shut down a jointly run industrial park in the North.

South Korea also proposed that athletes from both sides march together at the Games’ opening ceremony and other joint activities during the Winter Olympics, Mr. Chun told reporters outside the talks.

Athletes from the two Koreas have paraded together at the opening and closing ceremonies of major international games before, although this has not been seen since the 2007 Asian Winter Games in China, after relations chilled under nearly a decade of conservative rule in the South.

It would also be the first time since 2005 that the North will send its female cheerleaders, dubbed the “cheering squad of beauty” by the South Korean media.

‘PEACE HOUSE’
The meetings continued on Tuesday afternoon after the two sides broke up for separate lunches. Officials began speaking at 10 a.m. (0100 GMT) in the three-storey Peace House just across the demilitarized zone on the South Korean side of Panmunjom truce village.

“North Korea said that they are determined to make today’s talks fruitful, and make it a groundbreaking opportunity,” South Korea’s Mr. Chun said.

Mr. Chun also said the South Koreans proposed resuming negotiations over the North’s nuclear program, but there was no specific response from the North.

However, North Korean officials said during the meeting they were open to promoting reconciliation through dialogue and negotiation, according to Mr. Chun.

The head of the North Korean delegation, Ri Son Gwon, said, “We came to this meeting today with the thought of giving our brethren, who have high hopes for this dialogue, invaluable results as the first present of the year…”

North Korea entered the talks with a “serious and sincere stance,” said Mr. Ri, chairman of the North’s Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland.

South Korean Unification Minister Cho Myoung-gyon expressed optimism as the meeting began.

“Our talks began after North and South Korea were severed for a long time, but I believe the first step is half the trip,” said Mr. Cho. “It would be good for us to make that ‘good present’ you mentioned earlier.”

“Everything feels slightly new as we have not had talks in a while,” he said.

Just before the delegation drove into the demilitarized zone, about 20 South Koreans were seen waving a banner that read: “We wish the success of the high-ranking inter-Korean talks.”

One man was spotted waving a flag with a unified Korean peninsula.

Each side’s delegation consisted of five senior officials.

The North Korean delegation walked over the border inside the joint security area to the Peace House around 0030 GMT, an official from the South’s Unification Ministry told reporters.

The United States, which has 28,500 troops stationed in South Korea as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War, initially responded coolly to the idea of inter-Korean meetings, but US President Donald J. Trump later called them “a good thing.”

Mr. Trump has said he would like to see talks go beyond the Olympics. “At the appropriate time, we’ll get involved,” he said. — Reuters