In dieting, low-fat or low-carb are the same — study
MIAMI — Common dieting advice urges people to either eat fewer carbohydrates or less fat in order to shed weight. But a study Tuesday found neither approach is better than the other.
Nor is a person’s genetics or insulin metabolism a key factor in whether a diet works for them or not, said the report in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
The findings could have implications for the $66-billion US weight loss industry, and particularly the latest trend of DNA dieting, which claims to point people to the best diet for their genes.
“We’ve all heard stories of a friend who went on one diet — it worked great — and then another friend tried the same diet, and it didn’t work at all,” said lead author Christopher Gardner, professor of medicine at Stanford University. “It’s because we’re all very different, and we’re just starting to understand the reasons for this diversity. Maybe we shouldn’t be asking what’s the best diet, but what’s the best diet for whom?”
The study enrolled 609 people — 57% women — aged 18 to 50 and randomly assigned them to either a low-fat or low-carb diet for a year. At the end, the average weight loss was 13 pounds in both groups.
Some individuals lost far more — up to 60 pounds, while some gained 20. But researchers were unable to find any link between dietary approach and superior weight loss.
After a year, “there was no significant difference in weight change between a healthy low-fat diet vs. a healthy low-carbohydrate diet,” said the report.
At the beginning, “participants got part of their genome sequenced, allowing scientists to look for specific gene patterns associated with producing proteins that modify carbohydrate or fat metabolism,” said the report.
They also drank a shot of glucose on an empty stomach so researchers could measure their bodies’ insulin outputs.
“Neither genotype pattern nor baseline insulin secretion was associated with the dietary effects on weight loss,” it said.
What seemed to help people lose weight was following a single strategy: eat less sugar, less refined flour, and as many vegetables and whole foods as possible.
“On both sides, we heard from people who had lost the most weight that we had helped them change their relationship to food, and that now they were more thoughtful about how they ate,” said Gardner. — AFP
A NEW BOOK by The Sexy Chef, one of Manila’s leading healthy food delivery services, teaches readers not only to lose weight through cooking, but to stick to a plan. The book is aptly named 21 Days to A Sexier You. Sexy Chef co-owner, singer Rachel Alejandro, said during a press conference in Quezon City earlier this month that the 21-day weightloss plan, which she helped draft, was formed under the belief that habits are formed after 21 days of sticking to them. The plan contains exercise tips, diet tips, and even clothing cues to get you started. The company’s first two cookbooks — The Sexy Chef Cookbooks and Eat, Clean, Love — emphasized healthy lifestyles, while 21 Days really pushes weight-loss measures, said Barni Alejandro, Ms. Alejandro’s sister and Sexy Chef co-owner, by focusing on four “fat-fighting” nutrients: calcium, omega 3, vitamin D, and fiber. The dishes were devised with the help of fitness nutritionist Nadine Tencgo. The four highlighted nutrients are supposed to kick in to coax the body even more to melt away fat when other diets hit a weight-loss plateau. The book has sections ranging from Breakfast, Grab and Go Mason Jars, Flat Belly Meals, Juicing, and the sisters’ personal favorite: the Meatless Mondays chapter. “We love plant-based food,” said Barni Alejandro. Most of these recipes contain Quorn, a meat substitute derived from a fungus, with Barni Alejandro saying that her favorite recipe is the Quorn tinola with lemongrass. Rachel Alejandro was quick to remind, however: “Being sexy, a lot of it is a mind-set, and being confident, and feeling good about your body.” — JLG
