Home Blog Page 9878

DoF launches sewage treatment plant amid Manila Bay cleanup

THE Department of Finance (DoF) said that its office along Roxas Boulevard in Manila has commissioned and launched a P2.8 million state-of-the-art sewage treatment facility, in line with the government’s efforts to rehabilitate the Manila Bay.
“The DoF Building’s sewage treatment facility discharges effluent into the Manila Bay that is classified as Class C, which is fit for fishing and the propagation and growth of fish and other aquatic resources. This is the minimum standard of the DENR for water being discharged into the bay. We are now conducting tests to check what still needs to be done so that our STP can meet the Class B requirement, which is fit for bathing and swimming,” Alvin P. Diaz, DoF Director, said in a statement on Tuesday.
Last Sunday, the DENR issued cease and desist orders to three establishments allegedly releasing pollutants into Manila Bay, and served notices of violation to six businesses that do not have proper sewage treatment plants (STPs). The DENR earlier called on government offices to comply with environmental laws and serve as models especially for the ongoing rehabilitation of Manila Bay.
Mr. Diaz said that DoF’s refurbished building has a number of environment-friendly features such as LED lighting systems and efficient air conditioning, which it held up as a model for other government establishments up for renovation.
“Even the impressive glass envelope in front of the building serves a purpose other than to be aesthetically pleasing, The glass cladding cuts the noise entering the building and also reduces the heat which makes it energy efficient,” Mr. Diaz said.
“We are currently working for the DENR’s issuance of a discharge permit that will validate DoF’s compliance with existing rules and regulations,” Mr. Diaz noted.
According to Mr. Diaz, the STP is self-maintaining, thus does not generate maintenance costs.
Mr. Diaz added: “The advantage of having an STP is that you are able to regulate and control effluent water, making sure that it is in compliance with the government requirements, and thus contributing to the preservation of our marine resources.”
“Among the government agencies with their STPs are the City Hall of Caloocan, Casimiro Henares Hospital in Rizal, Antipolo Hospital, Langhari Public Market in Malabon, and the Molino Public Market in Bacoor, Cavite, to name a few,” Mr. Diaz said. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio

PHL looks to Israeli firms for agriculture technology, investment

By Christine Joyce S. Castañeda Senior Researcher
and
Mark T. Amoguis Researcher
THE Philippines is looking to tap Israeli expertise and investment to develop the agriculture sector, the Department of Agriculture said.
At a meeting with an Israeli delegation in Taguig City yesterday, Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel F. Piñol said he hopes to enlist Israeli technology to help irrigate 500,000 hectares of farmland over the next three years to help boost rice production.
Mr. Piñol said he hopes to explore cooperation in five key areas: solar irrigation, drone technology, dairy farming, aquaculture, and greenhouse technology.
“We are now looking into using drone technology for rice seeding, and we will be very interested if our Israeli friends can work with us in this area,” Mr. Piñol said, adding that Israeli help will be welcome in raising dairy productivity.
According to Mr. Piñol, the country only produces 1.8% of its total dairy requirement and imports the remainder.
“We would be interested in establishing a government-to-government engagement in this field,” he said.
On the need for greenhouse technology, Mr. Piñol said: “This is our option to address climatic conditions in the country which affect agriculture. We really have to go full-blast in greenhouse farming.”
Crops he cited for possible Israeli participation were abaca, coconut, mango, seaweed, shrimp, processed meat and cacao.
Israel Ambassador to the Philippines Rafael Harpaz said on the sidelines of the event that he sees major potential for doing business in agriculture.
“We identified that there’s a great potential for Israeli and Filipino companies to do business together… but there are some challenges that the Filipinos are facing when it comes to developing the agriculture sector,” Mr. Harpaz told BusinessWorld.
The Israeli delegation consisted of agricultural management software company AgriTask, greenhouse company Argos (Agri-Projects) Ltd., dairy milking and herd intelligence firm Allflex, horticulture company Eisenberg Agri Co. Israel, post-harvest technology company Eshet Eilon, agricultural services company Gadot Agro, fertilizer company Israel Chemical Ltd., agro-technology firm Innovative Agro Industry, micro-irrigation and greenhouse solutions provider, landscaping and irrigation company Metzerplas Cooperative Agricultural Organization Ltd., and water technology firm Tahal Group.
“These Israeli companies have the technology that could help the areas that you need… when it comes to traditional issues of agriculture, drip irrigation, postharvest, all the areas of dairy production, agro-industry, water management, water security. Israel excels in these areas and all these were discussed during the historic visit of your President (Rodrigo R. Duterte) in September….,” Mr. Harpaz said.
Mr. Duterte visited Israel in September, signing 21 agreements worth roughly $82.9 million.
Total trade between the Philippines and Israel hit $170.57 million in 2018, according to the Department of Finance, with Israel the 42nd biggest destination for Philippine exports that year.

Natural gas output expected to decline 7% in 2019

DOMESTIC PRODUCTION and demand for natural gas are expected to decline in 2019 because of the scheduled five-day maintenance of offshore Malampaya gas-to-power platform in October, the Energy department said.
Production this year is projected to drop by 7% to 141,255 million standard cubic feet (mmscf), down from 151,949 mmscf last year, it said.
“This maintenance schedule affects the operation of all natural gas power plants including the PSPC (Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp.) refinery. Maintenance activities for all natural gas-fired power plants including the refinery are expected to be implemented during 2019,” the DoE said in its latest natural gas report.
Demand is seen to decline by 7.8% to 135,771 mmscf because of the volume of nomination of natural gas because of the scheduled shutdown as well as the implementation of maintenance activities of the power plants — the main consumers of natural gas.
Power plants, the biggest users of natural gas, are expected to use 132,498 mmscf this year, down 7.9% compared with last year’s 143,794 mmscf.
“The decline in utilization of power generation is attributed to the implementation of major maintenance program of the respective natural gas power plants such as Kepco Ilijan, Sta. Rita and San Lorenzo within the year,” the DoE, which also pointed to the maintenance activities as a reason for the expected decline.
“However, the natural gas-fired power plants will still operate using alternate fuels such as diesel and condensate,” it said.
In 2018, the country’s natural gas production increased by 8.33% to 150,804 million mmscf, showing the importance of the locally sourced fuel.
“The Philippines continued to be self-sufficient in natural gas with 100% of its production coming from offshore Malampaya gas field,” the DoE said.
It said the increase in the volume of supply was the result of the gas field’s production availability of 98.5% with an average daily gas production to customers of 399 mmscf.
“Also, there was no maintenance activity conducted by the operator in the platform during the year,” the DoE said.
Natural gas accounted for 34% of Luzon’s power generation mix, the DoE said, along with energy sources such as coal, oil, hydro, geothermal and renewable energy sources like wind, solar and biomass.
In terms of demand, the country’s requirement last year reached 145,273 mmscf, up 8% from 134,511 mmscf in 2017.
“The overall increase in the volume of utilization was due to the full operation of the five natural gas power plants and the refinery located in Batangas,” the department said.
This suggests a volume disparity of 5,531 mmscf between what has been supplied from the Malampaya gas field against the actual recorded demand.
“The difference can be attributed to flaring, gas heating, venting and purging of natural gas at the platform, onshore-gas-plant (OGP) facility own use power plants, and linepack in the 504 [kilometer] natural gas pipeline,” the DoE said.
Power generation accounted for the biggest share in usage at 98%, with the industrial sector making up the remaining 2%.
Total demand for natural gas in the power generating sector was 142,723 mmscf, up 7.91% from 132,256 mmscf previously.
Last week, DoE Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi said he asked the operator of the Malampaya platform about any upcoming shutdown.
Shell Philippines Exploration B.V. (SPEx), a unit of Anglo-Dutch company Royal Dutch Shell plc, is the operator of Service Contract 38 off Palawan, along with Chevron Malampaya LLC and the Philippine National Oil Co.-Exploration Corp. as joint venture partners.
“Another question is, what are the preparatory measures that are being undertaken that there will be feedstock, fuel, for the plants that are dependent on them,” Mr. Cusi said. — Victor V. Saulon

Arroyo seeking Saudi investment for Mindanao

SPEAKER Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said she is pushing for six investment projects in Mindanao to be backed by Saudi Arabia.
“There were six project proposals that were prepared by the six congressmen in the delegation and this afternoon of Manila time, which is noontime in Jeddah (Saudi Arabia), they will be presenting to the Jeddah Chamber the six proposals,” Ms. Arroyo said in a chance interview, Wednesday.
The Speaker recently led an investment mission to Saudi Arabia with six Mindanao legislators — Lanao del Sur-2nd district Rep. Mauyag B. Papandayan, Jr., AMIN Reps. Makmod D. Mending, Jr. and Amihilda J. Sangcopan, Maguindanao-1st district Rep. Bai Sandra A. Sema, Tawi-Tawi Rep. Ruby M. Sahali and Kusug-Tausug Rep. Shernee Abubakar Tan.
Among the project proposals were a Public-Private Partnership to rebuild the Montaner Hospital and expand Al Haj Memorial in Lanao del Sur and two other hospitals destroyed during the Marawi siege, development of a Halal economic zone, a cacao plantation in Cotabato City, the development of the seaweed industry in Tawi-Tawi and oil and gas exploration activities in three blocks in the Sulu Sea.
“Our commercial attache who is based in Dubai is there so hopefully she will be able to follow through,” the Speaker said.
The Speaker said the investment efforts intend to supplement implementation of the Organic Law for the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.
“It is now our responsibility to try to do what we can in order to fulfill the expectations of the people of Bangsamoro that they be lifted out of poverty and the best way to fight poverty now in the Bangsamoro is to be able to create jobs,” she said in a statement, issued on Wednesday.
“The last attacks we believe were terrorist attacks and we are very grateful to Saudi Arabia because they are with us in the fight against terrorism. When I was President of the Philippines, I always said that terrorism is very much related, at least in the Philippines, to poverty. And in the Philippines as well the problem of peace in Muslim Mindanao are also very much related to the problems of poverty,” she said.
During her visit, the Speaker met with the Saudi Arabia General Investment Authority (SAGIA) headed by its Governor Ibrahim Al Omar and then with Dr. Abdullah Bin Mohammed Bin Ibrahim Al Sheik, her Saudi Arabian counterpart as President of the Majlis Al Shura of the Consultative Assembly of Saudi Arabia, the Kingdom’s legislative body. — Charmaine A. Tadalan

Long-term measures needed to save tawilis: NGO

ENVIRONMENT protection group Oceana Philippines is urging the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) to implement a temporary ban on fishing for tawilis in Taal Lake after the species was classified as endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
“The Protected Area Management Board of Taal Volcano Protected Landscape has already endorsed seasonal closure of tawilis to give it time to reproduce. The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) proposed a three-month fishing ban on tawilis since 2013. The DENR and BFAR must join forces to curb the major threats to the survival of tawilis and to ensure that there is sustainable management of this species,” Gloria E. Ramos, Vice-President of Oceana Philippines, said in a statement on Tuesday.
Tawilis (Sarinella tawilis) is a freshwater sardine considered a regional delicacy.
Ms. Ramos said that while closed seasons will help the fish populations regenerate, other measures should also be implemented to ensure the long-term sustainability of the fishery, including tight controls on fish pens, regular monitoring of water quality, and keeping out invasive species.
“Demand for tawilis has driven the fish to near extinction and this must be carefully studied by both scientists and resource economists,” Ms. Ramos said.
“There’s an urgent need to implement a science-based sardine management framework that will address issues of overfishing, regulating the catch of juveniles, and regeneration. The continuous encroachment of commercial fishers in municipal waters must also be addressed,” Ms. Ramos added.
According to the Progresibong Alyansa ng mga Mangingisda sa Pilipinas (PANGISDA- Pilipinas), commercial fishing operations should be regulated to address the overfishing of tawilis.
“The ban must focus on the commercial fishing sector. Their boats are large and their gear is very efficient, so they catch the majority of the stocks. At the same time, municipal fishers are also displaced, and left with less catch,” PANGISDA Chairperson Pablo R. Rosales said in a statement. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio

NFA says over half of rice import orders have arrived as of Jan. 29

THE National Food Authority (NFA) said 258,854.80 metric tons (MT) or about 53.77% of the 500,000 MT of rice contracted for import has arrived in the Philippines as of Jan. 29.
About 123,905 MT has been unloaded in various ports, the NFA said, and the shipments have been received by the agency’s warehouses.
About 235,140.20 MT of rice are still scheduled to arrive, with 81,728 MT still in transit, while 141,967.20 MT are loading.
The ports due to receive shipments are Manila, La Union, Subic, Batangas, Tabaco, Iloilo, Bacolod, Cebu, Tacloban, Zamboanga, Cagayan de Oro, Davao, General Santos, and Surigao.
The 500,000 MT of rice forms part of the total 750,000 MT in rice imports conducted by the NFA before it loses its role as the main importer of rice, prior to the implementation of the rice tariffication bill. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio

Snack makers back continued regulation of sugar imports

THE Philippine Confectionery Biscuit and Snack Association (PCBSA) said it wants a system in place to continue to regulate sugar import volumes once imports are liberalized.
PCBSA President Kissinger Sy said it will propose to the government a mechanism that will consider the absorptive capacity of the market before allowing imports to prevent prices from being depressed, dampening the appetite for planting sugar.
He backed the retention of an accreditation system for importers “to ensure that we will only import what we need in our factories” and “not use (imports) as traders.”
“If we are allowed to import on our own, it will really create a big dent in the market. That’s why we need options, for local supply and imports,” Mr. Sy said in a briefing in Makati City.
“The scariest scenario is if everyone is allowed to import… prices will collapse and farmers will stop planting… Somehow the market will need to be regulated,” Mr. Sy added.
A November 2018 report by the United States Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service said that global production for marketing year 2018 -2019 is forecast to fall 9 million tons to 186 million, mainly due to an 8-million-ton drop in Brazil, the world’s top supplier, amid unfavorable weather and more sugarcane being diverted towards ethanol production.
Meanwhile, the sugar output of Thailand, the Philippines’ top source of imports, is forecast to decline 900,000 tons to 13.8 million on lower yields amid lower-than expected precipitation.
Mr. Sy added that the group is willing to pay a tariff as high as 35%, the maximum duty accorded by the ASEAN Trade and Investments Agreement to products under the sensitive or highly sensitive list.
He added that the PCBSA may be able to finalize its position paper to be submitted in February to various government agencies. — Janina C. Lim

Indonesia’s Pertamina interested in LNG hub project

INDONESIAN oil and gas producer PT Pertamina (Persero) has expressed interest in setting up a regasification hub in the Philippines worth some $1 billion, according to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).
In a statement Wednesday, Trade Secretary Ramon M. Lopez said the plan was presented to the department on Jan. 29.
“More investors, in different industries like PT Pertamina, have expressed their confidence in the country’s economic stability and business environment under the Duterte administration. They wish to partner with us in creating a more comfortable life for every Filipino through various opportunities,” Mr. Lopez said in the statement.
Pertamina Corporate Marketing Director Basuki Trikora Putra was quoted as saying that the company “is ready to offer its integrated LNG solutions by investing in FSRU or land-based LNG regasification and provide competitive LNG supply.”
He was referring to Floating Storage Regasification Unit terminals.
“Having long experience as one of the world-leading LNG global players, we would like to share the same experience in the Philippines. We are really keen to invest in the Philippines,” Mr. Basuki was quoted as saying.
Mr. Lopez said the DTI will assist Pertamina in looking for local partners for the project.
Pertamina operates six refineries in Indonesia with a combined production capacity of one million barrels of oil a day.
The government is currently moving to develop an LNG facility to get ahead of the expected depletion of the Malampaya field starting 2024. — Janina C. Lim

Do VAT-exempt medicines need the BIR’s prescription?

At the start of the year, we often find people determined to come up with New Year’s resolutions. For sure, staying healthy is part of most people’s list. Not surprising, as Filipinos are now health-conscious; health and wellness establishments are everywhere; and most people are trying new diets.
The Constitution itself mandates every Filipino’s right to health: it declares that “the State shall protect and promote the health of the people and instill health consciousness among them” (Article II, Section 15).
Tax laws also carry out this mandate. Notable tax policies encourage everyone to be healthy. For instance, aside from their significant contribution to collections, “sin” and “sweet” taxes aim to regulate or discourage too much consumption of cigarette, alcohol, and sweetened beverages. The main objective of these tax measures is to promote a healthier society. Another health-related drive introduced in the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion law, or TRAIN, is the VAT exemption on medicines prescribed for diabetes, high cholesterol, and hypertension (DCH meds) with effect from Jan. 1. This VAT exemption will lessen the financial burden on patients with these conditions.
In early 2019, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 25-2018, prescribing the rules on VAT exemptions for DCH meds. RR 25-2018 specifically declared that only those drugs on the “List of VAT-exempt diabetes, high-cholesterol and hypertension Drugs” identified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are VAT-exempt. The BIR and the other government offices recently released more rules or prescriptions supplementing RR 25-2018, which are all very helpful.
One may need a doctor’s prescription to buy DCH meds from a drugstore. So, is a doctor’s prescription a prerequisite to VAT-exemption?
The TRAIN law says medicines prescribed for diabetes, high cholesterol, and hypertension; one may presume the term “prescribed” refers to a doctor’s prescription. To be clear, nothing in government-issued rules requires a doctor’s prescription. What is important is that the medicine must be on the list of VAT-Exempt Drugs issued by the FDA. In other words, VAT exemption of DCH meds does not need a doctor’s prescription.
Nonetheless, the BIR may need to issue guidelines to explain the transitional impact of this VAT exemption, particularly its effect on the supply chain, e.g. wholesalers, distributors and retailers. Remember that the sales of DCH meds were subject to VAT until Dec. 31. This means that the DCH medicines bought by the drug traders prior to Jan. 1 include input taxes, which they can validly claim as credit against their output taxes. Some of these previously bought stocks for resale were still on hand at the close of Dec. 31. The traders will eventually sell these DCH meds in 2019 as VAT-exempt. In the current VAT system, if a taxpayer’s sale is VAT-exempt, any input tax attributable to such sale forms part of the cost of the goods sold, and may not be claimed as input tax credit.
So, what will happen to the input taxes previously claimed by drug traders on the DCH meds they purchased prior to Jan. 1 that are sold in 2019? Here are three possible approaches to address this transitional impact.
The first one is for the affected wholesalers, distributors and retailers to amend their previously filed VAT returns and take out the input taxes they claimed on the DCH meds. Upon selling these DCH meds in 2019, they can claim these input taxes as part of the purchase cost of the meds they sold instead of as input tax credits. Technically, this seems to be the right approach because it follows the VAT law to the letter. However, it could create more complications rather than solutions. For instance, if the drug traders were able to use the input taxes as credit against their output VAT liabilities in their previous VAT returns, such amendment would result in deficient VAT payments. Affected taxpayers would end up paying deficiency VAT plus penalties. This penalizes taxpayers for their previously valid actions which were nullified by a subsequent law. If this is applied, the TRAIN law will be an ex post facto law in this respect, which is unconstitutional. Obviously this was never the intention of the lawmakers.
The second approach requires drug traders to compute for input taxes corresponding to VAT-exempt sales of DCH meds in 2019. Drug traders will consider such amount as part of the cost of the goods sold. This will deducted from the input taxes in 2019. Thus, there is no need to amend the previous VAT returns. This approach may be more reasonable than the first, but otherwise tricky: it requires the taxpayer to treat theoretical input taxes as a cost. The law is clear that the input taxes forming part of the cost should be those that are actual and directly attributable to the VAT- exempt sale. This approach is therefore inconsistent with the rules.
The third approach is to allow the drug traders to apply the TRAIN law prospectively, plain and simple. No need to account for the input taxes on purchases prior to Jan. 1. Whether they were able to use such input taxes as credit against their output VAT in the previous years, drug traders would treat their old DCH meds stocks as if they were VAT-exempt purchases, which would be the scenario from 2019 and onwards (except for importers). This will give the drug traders some relief. Besides, they are just doing their part in promoting a heathier country as envisioned by the TRAIN law.
Considering the above issues, the BIR may need to issue further instructions about the transitional impact of VAT exemption on DCH meds. A prescription that should not cause headaches: it needs to be as effective as properly prescribed medical drugs. Who knows, with appropriate prescriptions from the BIR on gray areas, the Philippines could become a tax-healthier country.
The views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Isla Lipana & Co. The content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for specific advice.
 
Brando C. Cabalsi is a director at the Tax Services Department of Isla Lipana & Co., the Philippine member firm of the PwC network.
(02) 845-27 28
brando.cabalsi@ph.pwc.com

The cannabis industry

In March 2018, the United Kingdom was reported to be the largest world producer of “legal” cannabis, otherwise known as “medical” marijuana. This was based on 2017 data with the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), which is the independent and quasi-judicial control organ for the implementation of the United Nations (UN) drug conventions.
The report is particularly interesting to me given the fact that UK is producing, and exporting, medicinal marijuana, despite the fact that its own laws make it illegal for its people to produce, possess, or use marijuana, even medically. This is also in light of efforts in our own Congress to legalize the use of medical marijuana in the Philippines.
The UK situation has been labeled by some British citizens as hypocritical, where the UK government prohibits the local use of medical marijuana but allows its production for export. To me, however, it indicates that one country can actually produce — and export — a product even while it is still deemed illegal in its own territory. In short, I perceive an opportunity here for us.
UK online publication The Independent reported in March 2018 that the UK was also the largest exporter of medical marijuana, with 2.1 tons exported in 2016, or roughly 70% of the world total. The report noted, quoting INCB data, that 95 tons of marijuana was also produced in the UK in 2016 for medicinal and scientific use, accounting for 44.9% of the world total.
However, other data seem to indicate that while the UK produced the most medical marijuana, it wasn’t exactly growing its own “weed.” This raises the possibility that marijuana plants are actually being grown elsewhere, and just processed in the UK to produce medical-grade cannabis, and then exported to countries that allow their use.
As of January 2018, or a year ago, it was estimated — using available data — that the top 10 marijuana producers in the world were reportedly the following countries: India, Nigeria, Canada, Jamaica, Paraguay, Colombia, Mexico, Afghanistan, Morocco, and the United States. The list did not include the UK. Other top marijuana producing countries listed were Mozambique, Ghana, Swaziland, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Laos, Lebanon, Nepal, Netherlands, and Albania.
Now, if you think this is just a fad, a trend that will eventually die down, then maybe you may have to reconsider. In my opinion, the use of medical or medicinal marijuana is just the start of a major industry. In fact, some of the producers of medical marijuana have already found themselves listed in stock markets in other parts of the world.
After all, in the United States alone, online publication Market Watch reported that Marijuana Business Daily estimated the overall impact of cannabis products on the US economy to hit around $47.6 billion to $68.4 billion by 2021, based on sales of medical and recreational marijuana at the retail level, including flower, infused products, and concentrates.
To date, Uruguay and Canada have legalized the use of medical marijuana on a nationwide basis. In the United States, 29 states as well as the District of Columbia (where Washington DC, the White House, and the US Capitol are) have reportedly allowed possession and consumption of marijuana to some extent. Recreational marijuana use is now also reportedly legal in Alaska, California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Maine, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
And publicly listed companies are benefitting from these developments. According to a 2017 report by Market Watch, these listed companies include The Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (NYSE, Market cap: $5.88 billion); Canopy Growth Corp. (TSX, Market cap: $4.18 billion); GW Pharmaceuticals PLC (NASDAQ, Market cap: $3.42 billion); Aurora Cannabis, Inc. (TSX, Market cap: $3.17 billion); and, Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ, Market cap: $515.4 million).
Market Watch noted that as of December 2017, five of the six Canadian firms on the top 10 list were involved with “cultivating and selling the plant,” and of the four US firms on the top 109 list, Scott’s Miracle-Gro was an “agricultural technology firm” while GW Pharmaceuticals, Insys Therapeutics and Cara Therapeutics were “biotech” firms.
cannabis marijuana
Market Watch also noted the first initial public offering, in 2016, of a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on owning and managing indoor grow facilities reached the equities markets. “Innovative Industrial Properties Inc. (NYSE) even posted a share price gain of nearly 30% in 2017. The company’s market cap is nearly $82 million. Other marijuana-focused REITs have formed and at least one other is publicly traded,” it added.
Just recently, the Philippine Congress passed a bill that intended to legalize and regulate the use of medical marijuana or medical cannabis. A report by CNN Philippines noted that under the bill, doctors licensed by the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency can prescribe the use of medical marijuana for qualified patients, and products can be accessed from accredited hospitals, as well as “Medical Cannabis Compassionate Centers” to be put up.
To date, the bill has no counterpart measure in the Senate. Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto III has argued that such a bill was unnecessary as Republic Act 9165 or the Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 already allowed the use of regulated substances for “compassionate” reasons, subject to the approval of government regulators.
Legalizing the use of regulated substances, particularly in the Philippines, is not without precedent. As noted by historian Ambeth Ocampo, a decree signed by President Emilio Aguinaldo on Nov. 20, 1898 actually authorized the “limited and contained use” of opium in Binondo, Albay, and Sorsogon.
To limit opium use, which was then deemed a public menace, Aguinaldo had the practical sense 121 years ago to instead restrict and regulate the vice rather than, perhaps foolishly, to ban it completely. But, whether his government or his officials — or Aguinaldo himself — was “compensated” for this action is uncertain. The Aguinaldo decree, issued to local officials, read:
“The service of leasing opium-smoking establishments being in a state of neglect on account of the state of war in which this territory found itself, but which is now under a form of government, it is urgently necessary to establish same for the double purpose of restricting it as far as possible on account of the harm it causes hygiene and public health. With the concurrence of the treasury department, I hereby order the following:”
“1st. Provisionally and until the government shall have awarded definitely at public auction, the lease of aforesaid service, which shall be effected shortly, after the proper proceedings which the case requires, the same is awarded to the Chinese: Francisco Bonifacio, Nubla Lim Chico, and Felipe Lim, residents of the district of Binondo, Manila, for a term of one month extendible.”
“2nd. The same department shall authorize a provisional contract with aforesaid Chinese at the rate of P1,200 per month, limiting the same to the provinces of Albay and Sorsogon, district of Catanduanes.”
“3rd. A copy of this decree shall be forwarded to the military and provincial chiefs of the provinces mentioned.”
“I have the pleasure of referring the same to you for your information; you will immediately make the award to the Chinese contractors aforementioned and report to this office the date when it is effected; furthermore, you will please order the local chiefs of your jurisdiction to please publish this by posters in the local dialect and acknowledge receipt of the same.”
It was, in my opinion, a pragmatic approach to regulating a vice: regulation with taxation. In fact, I reckon the regulate-tax strategy would have remained if not for our colonization by the Americans after their defeat of Aguinaldo in 1899. Allow me to quote a portion of the World Drug Report of 2008, which stated:
“The topic of opium reform reacquired currency in the USA following the occupation of the Philippines in 1898, which included the acquisition of a large ethnic Chinese opium addict population. The US authorities found that Manila alone had some 190 opium dens retailing a total of 130 metric tons of opium per year.”
“Under Spanish rule, the opium trade in the Philippines had been farmed out to state-licensed opium monopolies. Taxes from the industry generated a substantial portion of the government’s revenue, and it had been proposed that the US maintain this system. The proposal was within two weeks of being adopted [by the US Congress] when it was derailed by a last-minute campaign by Manila’s missionaries.”
It is ironic that making opium illegal was recommended by an Opium Committee for the Philippines that was appointed in 1903, which included the Episcopal Bishop of Manila, the Reverend Charles Brent, who was a Canadian national. More than a century since, Canada itself has become the second country in the world to actually legalize the use of medical marijuana.
I am keeping an open mind regarding all of these developments. But, as long as backed by sufficient scientific and medical studies and economic research, I would go to the extent of even suggesting that the Senate consider not only a bill allowing the use of medical marijuana, but even the amendment of existing laws to possibly allow the cultivation of marijuana locally and the processing of the plant for the production of medicine for here and for export abroad.
 
Marvin Tort is a former managing editor of BusinessWorld, and a former chairman of the Philippines Press Council.
matort@yahoo.com

In Honor Of Peddlers

Recently, Chinese-Filipino businessman, Henry Sy, Sr. died. An immigrant from an impoverished family in Jianjiang, a town near Xiamen, China, he started as a shoe peddler and when he died two Saturdays ago at the age of 93, he owned one of the world’s biggest shopping chains and the Philippines’ largest retailing chain. In 2018, he was listed as the richest man in the Philippines by Forbes with a net asset of $18.3 billion.
“Tatang,” as he is fondly called, is one of the Chinese migrants who made it phenomenally well in the Philippines. His story is reminiscent of the Jewish peddlers throughout the 19th century who migrated out of Germany to different places, mainly, in the United States of America. Peddling is an activity that consists of walking the road, selling goods door to door and house to house. It was considered a start-up occupation, especially to a migrant, to a stable enterprise or professional engagement. It was a springboard to more comfortable and higher-paying jobs or enterprises usually reserved for the locals.
Peddling required a lot of fortitude and determination so as to overcome difficulties and barriers. Peddlers suffered the discomforts of walking the road with all the elements of dust, heat, and rain. They faced physical and emotional challenges. They carried heavy burdens of goods. They were exposed to the danger of robbery on the road.
Amidst all these trials, peddling instills character in a person that serves as the key to one’s success. A peddler is persevering, thrifty, and resourceful. He is good with people. He is able to connect with customers. He is pleasant and communicates well with customers. He is well acquainted with his customers through his knowledge of local culture. Peddling serves as an activity that socializes him into the system. A peddler is a personal and communal network builder.
Henry Sy, Sr.
Henry Sy, Sr. peddled the shoes of some enterprising G.I. Joes after World War II. His success in shoe-peddling led him to put up his own shoe store, although initially, he found it difficult to partner with a shoe manufacturer that would be able to execute his ideas.
John Gokongwei, Jr., also a top Filipino businessman, peddled basic commodities using a bicycle at aged 15. He now has holdings in the food manufacturing, petrochemical, airline, and financial services industries. Andrew Tan of the Alliance Global Group, Inc. started as a kitchen appliance salesman.
Some people look at peddling as something demeaning. Peddlers usually sell quasi-luxuries bought by people who can be challenging to talk to. It is not easy to do what they do, i.e., “cold calls” or “sales talk” to people whom you don’t know, but whom you want to convince to buy your products because you think they need it. It can be humiliating, too, especially when they’re rejected. Imagine, however, the satisfaction one gets by closing a sale and developing loyalty or repeat purchases from customers. It can be financially and personally rewarding and fulfilling.
It is unfortunate that some business graduates scorn being “in the field.” It is here where good soldiers are formed. Under the heat of the sun and the other discomforts that peddling may bring, one develops the hallmarks of successful business magnates: fortitude, perseverance, determination, market understanding, and responsiveness.
Peddlers, above all, are men who have heart. Henry Sy, Sr. was named one of the Filipino Heroes of Philanthropy in 2009 by Forbes Asia. He was responsible for several professorial chair endowments in our university, De La Salle University (DLSU). One of our buildings was named after him in recognition of his generosity. John Gokongwei Jr.’s family is also DLSU’s generous donor. Their most recent donation, the John Gokongwei Jr. Innovation Center (JGIC), located within the De La Salle University (DLSU) Laguna campus, aims to become a hub for multimedia gaming and interactive entertainment in Southeast Asia.
These successful peddlers gave back to society with the hope of making it a better one, especially through the education of future generations. May their tribe increase, and may Tatang rest in peace.
 
Maria Victoria P. Tibon is an associate professor in the Management and Organization Department of the Ramon V. Del Rosario College of Business of De La Salle University. She is currently enjoying her service leave.
maria.victoria.tibon@dlsu.edu.ph

Does winning a debate matter in the elections?

By Tony Samson
IN THE USUAL CRUSADE to “know the candidates,” academic consortiums, poll agencies, and media embrace the “debate” as a good forum to gauge the worthiness of an aspirant. This seems to presume that the candidate in such a setting who is best able to communicate his position in particular issues (say, the minimum age for criminal prosecution), and narrate his platform as well as recite his qualifications for office, then the voter is sufficiently informed of his worthiness to win one of the 18,000 positions he or she is running for in the 2019 midterm elections.
The debate setting is deemed ideal to highlight qualifications and contrasts among say, the 76 candidates for the 12 senatorial seats. The format theoretically elicits the debater’s position on a topic chosen from a list of issues that may have surfaced from a focus group.
The same question is asked of the seven or so (maybe more) debaters spread out on the stage and ranged alphabetically. So, the first one is at a disadvantage in formulating the initial response, especially if he is unprepared for this topic. The last one too will just parrot what brilliant answers the previous ones gave, slyly hinting that his best punch lines have been coopted by the third speaker.
Preparation for the expected topics along with statistics and quotes do not automatically reveal the candidate’s depth of knowledge on an issue, only a tutor’s handiwork in preparing his pupil. Here, the sequence of responders can steal the statistics and references from another equally prepared, especially if he employed the same debate coach.
Communications skills are paramount in this exercise. It is too much like an academic setting where points are earned from witty repartees and a cogent argument that is well delivered. No wonder the debate format favors the academically inclined, and those who teach for a living. They are standard fare for contesting student leaders as well as competing in foreign competitions.
As a spectator sport, the debate can be sleep-inducing as the same question is serially tackled by candidates who hardly qualify for “life of the party” (pun intended). Only the TV anchors and hosts need to show rapt attention to the proceedings. They are instructed not to show any facial expression of delight or disappointment to maintain a sense of fairness accorded to the most stupid answers (do I still have ten seconds?) as well as profound flights to philosophical heights.
Candidates are reminded by their coaches or PR handlers not to be too verbose, and to avoid words exceeding four syllables, like “discombobulated.” Venturing to be too intellectual is seen as being detached from the people, maybe even looking down on them. Thus, is the effort for even the clumsiest native speaker to resort to using the vernacular. Here, it is alright to wax poetic and go for deep polysyllabic words (like karumaldumal) and still stay connected to the voters. There may even be gasps of awe — ano daw?
So, does debate performance move the election needle?
Even presidential versions of the debate format seem merely obligatory appearances for the candidates. One leading candidate (a big movie star) in a past election, and conceivably a boxer in a future one, begged off from the televised spectacle — I’d rather talk directly to the people.
Are debating skills favoring words and logic, and exposing the fallacy of others part of the necessary skills set of a politician? True, candidates for the legislature are running for an office where debating dexterity seems a necessary job requirement, at least in the televised portions of the process. What about the backroom negotiations, the dangling of incentives, and the distribution of pork? The useful words to such arguments are straightforward — yes, sir.
A very high proficiency in debating skills may even be a disadvantage to the politician who must rely on a majority of voters who find verbal dexterity irrelevant, if not suspicious. Can anything be politically worse than being characterized as an “inglisero” or a windbag, dismissed as NATO (No Action, Talk Only)?
Maybe voters are wise after all. They’ve heard too much talk and too little action. But does it follow that clumsy speech and inconsistency of logic lead to effective action? That’s a question worthy of a debate…among barbers and coffee drinkers.
 
Tony Samson is chairman and CEO, TOUCH xda.
ar.samson@yahoo.com