Home Blog Page 11039

The parable of the tax collector… and the taxpayer?

In the Christian scriptures, Jesus shared this parable to those who were convinced of their own righteousness and despised everyone else:

“Two people went up to the temple area to pray; one was a Pharisee and the other was a tax collector. The Pharisee took up his position and spoke this prayer to himself, ‘O God, I thank you that I am not like the rest of humanity — greedy, dishonest, adulterous — or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week, and I pay tithes on my whole income. But the tax collector stood off at a distance and would not even raise his eyes to heaven but beat his breast and prayed, ‘O God, be merciful to me a sinner.’ I tell you, the latter went home justified, not the former; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”

The parable is one of the more fitting passages for reflection during Lent, and the story definitely has a spiritual meaning attached to it. The account has two main characters: the tax collector (the Publican, in some versions); and the Pharisee.

In reading the description of the characters, one might wonder why the tax collector appeared to be associated with wicked persons. Well, such attribution has a historical context that we can read in the literature about the Jews and the Roman Empire. At present though, stumbling upon such portrayals of tax collectors might not be a good idea for a taxpayer who just had an unreasonable tax audit. Of course, it would be unfair to think the same of our government tax collectors, given the different setting and circumstances.

Close examination of the parable, however, would lead us to focus more on the other character — the Pharisee. In the parable, the Pharisee seemed to be proud of his being good and upright — perhaps, he believed that he did not have any fault, committed no error, and can fully support his beliefs about himself. Would some taxpayers relate to this claim? For taxpayers who are compliant with the tax rules, there is no problem; but for those who make the claim without first checking on themselves, there might be a problem.

In claiming to be compliant, a taxpayer should remember that this can always be challenged by the tax authorities. In our country, the tax audits could come from the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), from Local Government Units (LGUs), or from the Bureau of Customs (BoC).

With the BIR, as the April 15 income tax filing has passed, taxpayers may expect that taxable year 2018 will now included in the pipeline for possible BIR full-scope audits. Remember that the supposed extensive tax amnesty proposal has been reduced in scope. While the estate tax amnesty and the tax amnesty on delinquencies, under Republic Act 11213 and the related Revenue Regulations No. 4-2019 recently issued, are welcome developments for taxpayers, the taxpayers may continue to anticipate thorough tax inspections by the BIR covering the open taxable years.

On the other hand, it was previously reported in the news that Philippine companies should be ready for potential BoC audits as a result of the recent signing of the BoC’s Customs Administrative Order 01-2019. The order implements the post-clearance audit function of the BoC. That function was previously transferred to the Department of Finance in 2014, and was then subsequently returned to the BoC in 2017, a year after the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act was signed into law. Those affected by these developments are involved in import transactions. There have also been discussions that quite a number of BoC audit notice letters have been issued or are waiting to be released to the subject companies. Hence, this is something to watch out for.

Another notice of audit that a taxpayer may expect is issued by LGUs. The frequency and extent of these audits varies by jurisdiction; what they all have in common is that this audit, which mainly focuses on the examination of the taxpayer’s gross receipts/income, is another test that could pose a challenge to tax compliance.

In anticipation of the above types of tax audits, not to mention other regulatory requirements or examinations, it would be worthwhile for taxpayers to reflect and revisit their tax practices and relevant records. With the countless BIR issuances, BoC orders, LGU tax ordinances, and other rules, it would be prudent for the taxpayer to check the proper use of their manpower and other resources and to consult with experts. These measures would help ensure that a taxpayer does not fall into the danger of claiming “false self-righteousness” as in the parable. Otherwise, the risk will always be there — that a taxpayer could be “humbled” in a tax audit that might hit like an unexpected earthquake.

Let’s Talk Tax is a weekly newspaper column of P&A Grant Thornton that aims to keep the public informed of various developments in taxation. This article is not intended to be a substitute for competent professional advice.

 

Olivier D. Aznar is a partner from the Tax Advisory & Compliance division of P&A Grant Thornton, the Philippine member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd.

pagrantthornton@ph.gt.com

The China Issue: Impressions of a military mind

For the last five decades, the Philippines has fought the communist insurgency whose roots and foundations originated from Communist China. In spite of China’s shift to a free market economy and becoming the second largest economy in the world, the foundations of its political system are still basically communist-inspired. Why then did the Philippines, a country founded on democratic ideals, so quickly shift its alignment to China? Is it economic or political, or both? Notwithstanding China’s claim that it is here as a friend, the signs of its overbearing attitude indicate subjugation and subservience. This will be disastrous to the next generations of Filipinos. China will carry out its foreign relations in the international community predicated on the communist vision of protracted wars.

This article will delve on limited significant factors as seen by a professional soldier who has been exposed to and has managed scenarios relating to crisis and violence, both local and regional.

According to Sun Tzu, “Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat. The battlefield is the scene of constant chaos, the winner will be one who controls that chaos.”

When China declared its nine-dash line in the South China Sea, it was the start of a grand strategy to create chaos in the area. The chaos attracted not only the claimants but the whole world as well. It has become a flash point of conflict and gained world attention. Despite repeated diplomatic protests, China never acquiesced. In fact, it continues to carry out its uncontrolled intervention, be it infrastructure development or intimidation of our fishermen. The chaos has multiplied that neither strong world opinion nor the United Nations can bear on China to slow down.

Frontal confrontation by a world power, like the US, will only exacerbate the situation that may start a world war. Humanity cannot afford such a war. The destruction will be irreversible. Chaos breeds a series of conflicts in many forms. It is not the consequence of the rational pursuit of self-interest. It flows from the deepest wellspring of human nature in the pursuit of power. The leadership of the Chinese Communist Party wields enormous influence. The power that flows from its mantle is creating chaos and conflicts that are changing the global architecture.

Clausewitz said: “War is a continuation of politics.” The political posturing of China is an extension of its war for world domination. It has started with small countries like the Philippines, through economic strangulation, a tightening of the noose that will end in suffocation and eventual voluntary surrender.

The Communist Party has calibrated its mindset for insatiable ambition to be a great power. The struggle for power begins with the attempt to exert influence and extend domination over others. Clearly, China wants to replace the US as the dominant world power. The unfortunate victims of this enormous ambition are small and indefensible countries such as the Philippines that continue to be a whipping boy from the bullying tactics of China. China is drunk with the desire for expansion and the Communist Party rules with this passion.

soldiers

Is China a friend to the Philippines or an adversary? In military parlance, the indications negate that it is a friend. By not respecting our sovereign rights, we are being treated as a de facto enemy. China has infiltrated and violated the very realm of our legal personality in the community of nations.

We are all well familiar with the Trojan horse. Beware of Greeks bearing gifts — be on guard if an enemy offers an apparent gesture of friendship. Greeks broke the resistance by giving the impression that conflict was non-existent. In like manner, the Chinese have creeped in very quietly offering sweeteners as part of their confidence-building measures to influence our decision makers to accept their concessions, such as in the form of liberal loan packages and developmental projects disguised as altruistic gestures for a country whose appetite for capital is unlimited. We have been mesmerized and infatuated with a Trojan horse, unaware of the real motives, blind to their real intention. Behind these offers is the entry of a huge number of undocumented Chinese workers that has flooded certain businesses in the retail and construction industry.

The tale of the Trojan horse has become a ruse to gain entry into areas of sovereignty and economic dependence. Can we still at least mitigate the ruse? The magnitude is so great unless a superpower intervenes using diplomatic influence and initiative. The Trojan horse principle utilizes the element of surprise. With chaos, defenses are easily infiltrated. We have been taken off-guard. The buildup of military facilities in the Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal and Panganiban (Mischief) Reef, among others, has underscored our weak defense system. Friendship and goodwill, which have guided our foreign policy in dealing with China, have actually created a trap where an exit strategy is untenable.

The use of lies and half-truth is a tactic that is widespread in business and commerce, politics, and even in religion. What is not understandable is our penchant for profuse hospitality and trust. The Communist Party of China has indoctrinated its people, especially the youth that comprise the majority of their population, that areas within the nine-dash line are part of China. The tsunami of public opinion coming from this generation of Chinese will be the greatest deterrent to normalize the crisis in the West Philippine Sea. This is misinformation of such great magnitude. What counteraction do we have in our public relations arsenal to neutralize such misinformation?

Why have we fallen into this ideological trap? Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro L. Locsin, Jr. has expressly stated that the US is our only military ally. This is a very encouraging statement.

US Secretary of State Michael Richard Pompeo, during his recent visit to Manila, categorically stated that the US will react with military dispatch if the Philippines is threatened. However, this statement does not give a response to a specific scenario. When the threat was still manageable, the US never lifted a finger to neutralize China’s creeping invasion. It merely stood on the sidelines as a spectator.

As had been seen in Chile and Iraq in the past, the US waits for a country to deteriorate before it comes in for easier control. In the Philippines, they only came in when the dictatorship was at its ebb of decline. It is, therefore, wishful thinking that we will be rescued by the US from the jaws of China’s uncontrollable ambition.

China will continue its assertive and intimidating stance beyond the realm of acceptable political and diplomatic norms. It will not listen nor act on any diplomatic protest. It will continue to infiltrate and threaten our sovereign rights, and send undocumented Chinese nationals without respect for our immigration laws.

The clouds are slowly closing in on us. What shall we do now?

The article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or the MAP.

 

Lt. Gen. Jaime S. de los Santos (Ret.) is former Commanding General of the Philippine Army, Force Commander of the 24-Nation Multinational UN Peacekeeping Force in East Timor, Professorial Lecturer (part-time) at UP Diliman, and a member of the MAP National Issues Committee.

jaime_dlsantos@yahoo.com;

jimmydlsantos@gmail.com

map@map.org.ph

http://map.org.ph

Surveys not useful in these times

I have written here after every election that the results bear out the surveys. The results of the 2013 midterm election for senators and the 2016 presidential election validated pollsters Social Weather Stations’ (SWS) and Pulse Asia’s forecasts.

In 2013 all the 12 senatorial candidates projected to win by SWS and Pulse Asia did win. In 2016 the two pollsters projected Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte and Camarines Sur Representative Leni Robredo as the winning presidential and vice-presidential candidates. They even got the rankings of the candidates for the top two positions right.

Detractors of political polls cite the case of the American pollsters’ forecast of a Hillary Clinton victory over Donald Trump in the US presidential election in 2016 but it was Trump who was declared winner. Clinton did receive more votes than Trump as the polls projected. But the winner in the US is not based on who garners the most votes. The votes cast in the Electoral College determine the winner. A discussion of the US electoral system here would serve no purpose.

Other non-believers of surveys maintain that results of public opinion polls cannot be considered reliable indicators of the actual results of elections, pointing out that the ranks of the candidates in the polls do not jibe with the ranks of the actual election winners. But what the critics do not take cognizance of is that respondents are asked who they would vote for if the elections were held on the day of the interview, not on the day of the actual elections. A lot of things happen during the days between the day of the interview and the actual Election Day.

The changing preference of voters to a large extent is influenced by the events preceding the conduct of the surveys. The survey results reflect the sentiments of the people at the time the survey is conducted. SWS asks its respondents the question: “If the elections were held today, who would you likely vote as (position)?” Pulse Asia asks, “If the elections were held today, who would you vote as (position)?”

Voters’ attitude changes as circumstances change. Campaign strategists, like good military generals, adjust their strategies according to how the battle goes. We see that in the frequent changes made in the advertising messages of the candidates.

When Grace Poe ran for the Senate in 2013 as Grace Poe Llamanzares, her married name, she placed several notches below the 12th place in the polls. But when she dropped Llamanzares from her name and made known she was the daughter of Fernando Poe, Jr., her rank in the polls shot up to No. 5. When she ran for president in 2016, she emerged as topnotcher among the candidates in the early polls. When questions about her citizenship were raised, she fell behind Vice-President Jejomar Binay, who had been the expected winner before Poe’s name was floated.

Some doubters of the validity of survey results cite as evidence of faulty forecasting the case of two commissioned senatorial surveys of SWS conducted in the same period but presenting two different sets of probable winners. An SWS survey commissioned by Presidential Political Adviser Francis Tolentino showed Senator Cynthia Villar as the possible topnotcher in the 2019 elections. She was followed by Senator Grace Poe and Congresswoman Pia Cayetano, who were tied at 2nd place. Rounding the top five were Senator Koko Pimentel and former senator Lito Lapid, who shared the No. 3 slot.

Another SWS survey commissioned by the Lakas–CMD party forecast Senator Poe as the senatorial candidate in 2019 garnering the biggest number of votes. She was followed by Senator Villar then by Congresswoman Cayetano. In 4th spot was Senator Nancy Binay and No. 5 was former Senator Lito Lapid.

However, the Lakas-CMD-commissioned poll listed 39 candidates to choose from while the Tolentino-commissioned survey presented only 24 names. The more candidates to choose from the more widely scattered the votes cast would be. Votes that would have been cast for any of the top five in a list with 24 names went to any of the other 15 names in a list of 39 names.

Sometime in March a press release issued by the camp of former Special Assistant to the President Bong Go said that he (Go) received the approval of 47 percent of the respondents in a supposed SWS survey conducted in late February, placing him in solo third place in the ranking of senatorial candidates. The press release further said that the survey finding reflected a continuous improvement from his previous 5th to 6th place in January.

However, SWS President Mahar Mangahas said the survey was not theirs. The SWS posted on its website on March 7 a “Public Reminder” that it “again reminds the public that false reportage about SWS surveys is very common in the period leading up to an election. Everyone is enjoined to rely only on the SWS website (www.sws.org.ph) for its advisories, announcements, and survey reports released to the public.”

It noted that many surveys on preferences for national and local positions are being conducted by various groups in the run-up to the May 13 elections, that some of these groups are legitimate, while others are not.

Legitimate or not, survey results are now used as campaign materials. They are used to create a bandwagon effect. “Vote for the winnable candidate” is the exhortation of campaigners of leading candidates.

Social Weather Station and Pulse Asia have become mighty political forces. Their surveys have unduly influenced the outcome of national elections. Surveys have become significant factors in the political process. Instead of the campaign managers using survey results as basis in the formulation or revision of their campaign strategies, as they were originally meant for, they are now urging the voters to use the results as basis in the choice of their officials.

A religious sect’s endorsements are clear demonstration of the misuse of the poll results. Its endorsement of candidates is influenced by the survey results. It does not influence the voters’ decisions, as believed by politicians.

It has been my suspicion that the sect endorses only those candidates that the polls show to be likely winners. That suspicion has been proven to be correct in past elections. It endorsed early in the campaign period candidates who ranked steadily among the top five candidates favored by the survey respondents but delayed its endorsement of candidates ranked between 7th and 9th. By so doing, It sustains the myth that its endorsement assures victory.

I was in charge of the public opinion surveys at the Gallup Poll affiliate Robot Statistics, the first and at the time the only independent research firm in the country, in 1960. When the firm was commissioned to conduct a political survey, it was stipulated in the contract that the results of the survey would be for the private use of the client and were not to be released for public consumption. Robot released its election forecasts only after the polling places had been closed. The Daily Mirror (an afternoon daily) put out an Extra edition to announce the results of the survey after the close of polling booths, when the survey results could no longer be used to create a bandwagon effect.

That should also be the policy of SWS and Pulse Asia with regard to non-commissioned surveys (surveys they conduct on their own) — to announce the results of their surveys after the polling precincts have closed. I believe the heads of the two survey firms are both Political Science professors. They therefore should know that a large number of voters cast their vote like they are placing bets in a horse race — they vote for the odds on favorites.

Besides, survey results nowadays may not reflect the true sentiments of the respondents. As President Rodrigo Duterte has shown a disdain for criticism and opposition, as evidenced by the fate of Senators Leila de Lima and Antonio Trillanes,, Chief Justice Lourdes Sereno, media organizations Philippine Daily Inquirer and Rappler, and journalist Maria Ressa, survey respondents could also be afraid to say something not favorable to him, his policies, and his anointed senatorial candidates — Bong Go, Bato de la Rosa, and Francis Tolentino.

Interviews are conducted face-to-face. The respondent’s name and address are known to the interviewer. The interviewer’s true purpose may be dubious to the respondent. It should be noted that SWS has not conducted a survey on senatorial candidates since January or if it has, it has not released the results. I hope the other credible pollster Pulse Asia would follow suit, given that respondents’ answers may not be reflective of their true sentiments anyway.

 

Oscar P. Lagman, Jr. is a member of Manindigan! a cause-oriented group of businessmen, professionals, and academics.

oplagman@yahoo.com

What is the body saying?

By Tony Samson

MANY of our communication habits are cultural, and sometimes non-verbal. Such expressions take both forms (receptive and expressive). In a restaurant when asking for the bill, an imaginary square is drawn in the air with both sets of thumbs and forefingers. When one gets the waiter’s attention, he understands the message and the bill is promptly delivered. He can, of course, turn off his receptive skills by looking up at the ceiling and then at his fingernails looking for a stray cuticle to declare — are you talking to me?

Are there non-verbal signals applicable in the workplace?

Facial expressions are the first signals to watch out for. A fatigued and distracted look indicates more pressing matters than the approval of your request for a transfer of parking space closer to the elevator. It’s best to defer your agenda at a more propitious moment — nothing important, Sir…catch you later.

The CEO is texting without let-up and going through photo galleries on his phone, sometimes even smiling to himself at some message that popped up, not once looking up while you are presenting the strategies to make your unit the center of the universe. Is this a sign of disdain, or at the very least a lack of interest? Of course, it is. Can your office stuff fit in one portable box to be cleared by tomorrow?

Body language can also express a cooling of relations. The “avoidance waltz” is obvious to somebody paying attention. When X moves to the right, does Y automatically move to the left? Here, lesser beings are used as physical screens to avoid contact the same way a 3-point shooter uses blockers to get an open look.

Meetings for higher-ups can involve abruptly moving the time and then holding the conference outside the office, or country. These rescheduled events involve fewer people than before. (You’ve been dropped.) The Fence Sitter’s “Rule on Rescheduled Meetings” states: The more unusual the time and venue for a meeting called by a superior, the higher the probability of bad news for the persons suddenly excluded.

Do facial expressions like “a blank look” need to be translated? The warm greeting met with a vacant stare indicates any of the following: 1) The greeted party doesn’t know who you are; 2) He knows very well who you are but is pretending to be somebody else like a lost twin brother of the CEO; Or 3) He is more interested in the person right behind you and is wondering why you are blocking his view.

While media seldom get it right, corporate changes featured in the business news (he stepped down to spend more time with his family) often point to a crisis — where there’s smoke, there’s somebody smoking. When the questioned executive (Sir, is it true you were forced out of the company?) looks like a dagger has been plunged in his back, he is likely to avoid the question. (He is rushing for the exit.) There’s no need to repeat it. He heard it the first time.

Julius Caesar, the clueless victim of a palace coup had all the warnings of people whispering in small groups and even a soothsayer impeding his progress to the forum, with a clear warning to beware the ides of March. The famous exchange is between Caesar saying that the ides have come, and the soothsayer replying, “but not yet gone.” (It ain’t over till it’s over.)

Alertness to body language and hidden messages should be developed.

Still, there is the danger of reading too much into simple greetings so that even the most innocent actions are given conspiratorial overtones. What did his smile mean when he said “good morning” in the elevator? Why was he looking up at the numbers of the floors after the greeting? Does it mean my number is also up?

Words have literal meanings and interpreting their unintended connotations too minutely can lead to paranoia. What can be worse than being dismissed as “too insecure” and reading too much between the lines? Freud himself mused in his interpretation of dreams that, “sometimes an umbrella is just an umbrella.”

Still, when it comes to facial expressions, raised eyebrows combined with a sneer at your approach need no further comment.

 

Tony Samson is Chairman and CEO, TOUCH xda

ar.samson@yahoo.com

Is there a middle ground between employment and entrepreneurship?

By Mary Ritz Pay Seng

HINDI ka yayaman sa pagiging empleyado,” the saying goes (You won’t become rich as an employee).

The implication in this statement is that more Filipinos should pursue entrepreneurship. Owning your own business is the path to financial success — rather than earning a fixed salary, you can potentially keep all the revenues from your company.

While encouraging Filipinos to pursue business is beneficial, this thinking is flawed. Not every person is cut out to be an entrepreneur. Some may not be ready now, needing a few years more experience, while others may never be ready. Every person has different personalities and propensities for risk, after all.

Rather than only encouraging Filipinos to become business owners over employees — which is a false and unhelpful dichotomy — we should instead encourage them to make investments in the way that they are most comfortable with. The easiest path to do so has traditionally been investing in the local stock market, but even this is prohibitive for many.

Fewer than 1% of Filipinos invest in the local stock market. If you ask Filipinos who are interested in investing in stocks why they don’t, their reasons will mostly relate to ignorance, either of companies and industries or even on how to sign up to trade in the first place. The barrier to investing in stocks is too high for the vast majority of Filipinos.

entrepreneur

Fortunately, the new digital economy is making it easier to invest. Local crowdfunding platform Cropital gives Filipinos the opportunity to back local farmers and then earn a return from their investment, once the farmer has produced his yield and sold his goods at market.

InvestEd offers a similar opportunity, this time with college students: By backing those in need of tuition and financial assistance, you can grow your money by as much as 11% per annum. These solutions are especially welcome in the Philippines because they are two-sided innovations: They help beneficiaries who need money on one hand and investors who want to put their money to work on the other.

There are also international platforms helping Filipinos more easily invest. One of the most notable to recently arrive is social trading platform eToro, which enables Filipinos to invest in a wide variety of financial instruments, including everything from stocks and currencies to commodities and cryptocurrencies.

One of the more unique investment vehicles are eToro’s thirty CopyPortfolios. These do not exist on any other product or platform because they are a part of eToro’s Copytrader feature, which allows new investors to copy the investments of other investors, which they can vet through their publicly available data. Users can see their risk score, portfolio composition, and most importantly, track record, all of which are meant to make it easier to invest.

In the wake of local platforms like Cropital and InvestEd, and international platforms like eToro, I think we should reconsider the idea that entrepreneurship is the only path to financial success. While so-called “hustle porn” is popular — content that glorifies and romanticizes the journey of entrepreneurship — it promotes ideals that are simply not true. You don’t have to choose between employment or entrepreneurship. There are many financial solutions at your disposal. Choosing those that you are most comfortable with is the best kind of financial freedom that I know.

 

Mary Ritz Pay Seng currently works as a digital marketing manager for a tech company start-up as well as a digital specialist for SearchGuru.

Peso climbs as appetite improves

THE PESO ended higher on improved risk appetite.

THE PESO strengthened against the dollar on Monday amid quiet trading as risk appetite increased following strong US economic data released last week.

The local unit closed Monday’s session at P52.11 versus the greenback, up seven centavos from the P52.18 finish last week.

The peso traded stronger the whole day. It opened the session at P52.09 per dollar and surged to as high as P52.06 during the trading session. Meanwhile, its intraday low stood at P52.16 against the US currency.

Trading volume picked up to $957.02 million from $787.81 million that switched hands the previous session.

A foreign exchange trader said the peso traded within range yesterday amid quiet trading, as market participants await a slew of economic data, including domestic gross domestic product (GDP) growth and inflation, as well as monetary policy decisions from both the US Federal Reserve and Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.

“We’ve only started the week, so the trading was fairly quiet,” the trader said in a phone interview. “Also, it’s a holiday in Japan for the rest of the week, so Asia time would be fairly quiet for the entire week.”

The trader added that the peso was stronger on the back of positive data in the US such as the GDP report.

The US Commerce Department reported Friday that the world’s largest economy grew 3.2% in the first three months of the year, faster than the 2.2% GDP expansion a quarter ago.

The trader added that better-than-expected GDP data in the US drove risk appetite in the market.

Meanwhile, another trader said the local currency appreciated yesterday amid profit taking on expectations of weak US personal consumption expenditure data for February, the preferred price gauge of the Fed.

“This might increase dovish expectations ahead of the US central bank’s policy meeting this week,” the second trader said in an e-mail.

For today, the first trader expects the peso to move between P52 and P52.25, while the other gave a P52-P52.20 range.

The South Korean won and Thai baht strengthened on Monday as firmer-than-expected US economic growth figures supported risk sentiment, though market holidays and the US Federal Reserve meeting this week are keeping investors cautious.

“The strong US GDP data failed to push the dollar higher but that is real positive news for riskier assets generally and for equities. The Asian markets are in a holding pattern, awaiting key data,” said Khoon Goh, head of Asia research at ANZ. — K.A.N. Vidal with Reuters

PSE index ends higher ahead of economic data

By Arra B. Francia, Senior Reporter

THE MAIN INDEX finished higher on Monday despite trading sideways for most of the session as investors remained cautious ahead of the release of economic data.

The 30-member Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) firmed up 0.36% or 28.74 points to 7,897.02. The broader all-shares index likewise gained 0.16% or 8.04 points to 4,864.39.

“The PSEi continues to move sideways as the market is still waiting on economic data (gross domestic product, interest rates, and inflation) from the government. The announcement is scheduled this May 2019,” Unicapital Securities, Inc. Technical Analyst Jeff See said in a text message.

“The index is ranging between 8,200 and 7,600. Coincidentally, companies will also be releasing their first quarter 2019 earnings by May,” Mr. See added.

Papa Securities Corp. Sales Associate Gabriel Jose F. Perez noted how the PSEi showed another dull performance.

“It’s still too soon to tell if the market will be more active [on Tuesday]. Potential month-end window dressing could be tempered by the upcoming holiday on Wednesday,” Mr. Perez said in an e-mail.

Investors overseas had been pricing in positive results of the US GDP for the first quarter. The US reported that the economy grew by 3.2% year on year during the first quarter, way beyond the 2.3% market estimate. This also showed the fastest growth since 2013’s 3%.

Last Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average went up 0.31% or 81.25 points to 26,543.33. The S&P 500 index climbed 0.47% or 13.71 points to 2,939.88, while the Nasdaq Composite index added 0.34% or 27.72 points to 8,146.40.

Asian markets on the other hand ended mixed as investors also stayed cautious ahead of another round of trade war talks between the US and China. Japan’s Nikkei 225 retreated 0.22% or 48.85 points to 22,258.73. The Hang Seng index advanced 0.96% or 284.48 points to 29,889.49, while the Shanghai Composite shed 0.77% or 23.90 points to 3,062.50.

Back home, sectoral indices were equally split between losers and advancers. Holding firms led those in positive territory, jumping 0.88% or 66.79 points to 7,602.45. Industrials rose 0.66% or 76.28 points to 11,473.59, while financials eked out a gain of 0.16 point to 1,743.95.

Meanwhile, mining and oil slumped 0.5% or 39.16 points to 7,761.18. Property fell 0.2% or 8.89 points to 4,283.43, while services slipped 0.15% or 2.47 points to 1,583.26.

Turnover remained thin at P5.81 billion after some 1.06 billion issues switched hands, although slightly higher than the previous session’s P5.72 billion.

Decliners outpaced advancers, 97 to 89, while 52 names were unchanged.

Foreigners were net sellers for the second straight session with P42.91 million, narrower from Friday’s P249.78-million net outflow.

PNP to consider Ateneo study on drug war

THE Philippine National Police (PNP) said that it is open to suggestions from other sectors including the academe on improving the government’s campaign against illegal drugs, following a recent study by Ateneo Human Rights Center (AHRC) which scrutinized the conduct of the government’s “Oplan Tokhang” anti-drug campaign.

“I welcome the release of findings and conclusions of a study made by the Ateneo Policy Center on the PNP anti–drug campaign, particularly on the left hand approach that encourages drug offenders to submit themselves to voluntary rehabilitation and reform,” PNP chief General Oscar D. Albayalde said in a press briefing at Camp Crame on Monday, April 29.

The AHRC released last week a study or working paper titled, “How Change Rendered Human Rights More Vulnerable: Examining the Anti-Drug Campaign Legal Framework with a Human Rights Lens,” which flagged, among other things, circulars that operationalized the drug war as violating human rights.

“We are willing to listen and engage all sectors, including the academe, that are concerned and willing to assist the PNP in the fight against illegal drugs,” Mr. Albayalde said.

“PNP is open (to) any suggestions that will improve on our law enforcement, ‘yung aming pagtataas ng standard namin (as to how we can raise our standard). Of course, (on) how do we enforce the law. Baka meron silang (Maybe they have a) bright idea, because they are in the academe.”

A circular signed in July 2016 by then-PNP chief Ronald dela Rosa establishes Oplan Tokhang as “the conduct of house-to-house visitations to persuade suspected illegal drug personalities to stop their illegal drug activities.”

Ateneo said that the vagueness and lack of accompanying details in that first circular can serve as a license for police personnel to commit violations of the Bill of Rights.

“(T)he PNP Double Barrel Circular does not give clear details (on) how this should be operationalized, unlike how the PNP Anti-Illegal Drugs Manual details specific rules and procedures when conducting anti-illegal drug operations,” the research paper said.

The study also cited different types of “persuasion” by police authorities in conducting anti-drug operations.

“Other persuasion attempts were accompanied by a visible show of force or the use of vague or veiled threats. All these are accounts showing that persuasion assumes the color of custodial investigation in many ways,” the researchers said.

The working paper is qualified as “a draft in progress” and cites as authors Ma. Araceli B. Habaradas of the Ateneo Law School and Ray Paolo J. Santiago, Jaymie Ann R. Reyes, and Marianne Carmel B. Agunoy of the Ateneo Human Rights Center.

In response, Mr. Albayalde said: “They are not (the) proper body to say that it is constitutional or not, hindi sila ang Supreme Court (They are not the Supreme Court)…Pangalawa (Second) , that is voluntary in nature. Paulit-ulit po natin sinasabi na wala pong ginamit na pwersa dito at wala pong namatay (We always emphasize that no force was employed here [in the conduct of our operations] and no one died) because of Oplan Tokhang….Nag-surrender sila for rehabilitation (They surrendered for rehabilitation).”

Official data as of Feb. 28 cite 5,281 drug suspects killed since July 2016, when President Rodrigo R. Duterte launched the anti-illegal drugs campaign. Meanwhile, 74 uniformed personnel were arrested in anti-drug operations.

The PNP chief added: “Baka may pwede pa silang idagdag sa ginagawa naming (Maybe they can add something to our) internal cleansing program. This is the very reason why we have the internal cleansing to balance our operations, to make sure that our policemen on the ground will not abuse [their power].”

Mr. Albayalde also pointed out that some 200 policemen were injured or killed in anti-drug operations as of this month. — Vince Angelo C. Ferreras

Enrile’s motion to see documents on plunder case approved

THE Sandiganbayan Third Division has approved a motion by former Senate president Juan F. Ponce Enrile for the prosecution in his plunder case to produce material evidence for his trial preparation, which prosecutors have opposed.

But in its resolution dated April 24, the graft court said the scope of the evidence Mr. Enrile may access is “limited” to documents that the Supreme Court has allowed to be disclosed, such as the breakdown of the amounts of the kickbacks that Mr. Enrile is said to have received from the alleged misuse of his pork-barrel fund when he was in the Senate.

“In order that an order for production or inspection may be issued, the following requisites must concur: (a) there must be a motion showing good cause therefor; (b) the documents must constitute or contain evidence material to any matter involved in the case; and (c) the documents must be in the possession or under the control of the prosecution, police or other law investigating agencies,” the resolution stated.

“All these requisites are present in the instant case. First, there can be no dispute that the written statements, documents, etc. requested by the defense to be produced for copying purposes are material in this case….Second, it is indubitable that the documents are in the possession or under the control of the prosecution….Finally, a good cause exists for the granting of Enrile’s motion. It bears noting that Enrile was charged with a heinous offense, whose conviction carries with it the penalty of capital punishment,” the resolution also said, referring as well to the already abolished death penalty since the Arroyo administration.

The Third Division also said the former senator has “absolute control” on how to go with his defense: “If in his mind, he needed to inspect or copy pieces of evidence (not privileged) which are material for him to make an intelligent defense, then he is allowed by the Rules to ask for the inspection or production of these documents.”

Mr. Enrile, who is seeking a fresh term in the Senate this year, was accused of amassing P172.8 million worth of kickbacks from bogus non-government organizations led by Janet Lim Napoles, who was convicted in December last year in connection with the plunder case against former senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla, Jr.

Like Mr. Enrile, Mr. Revilla is seeking a new term in the Senate this midterm election. — Vince Angelo C. Ferreras

Palace offers P10-M bounty for capture of fugitive cop

By Vann Marlo M. Villegas, Reporter

MALACAÑANG has offered P10 million for information that would lead to the capture of dismissed police officer Eduardo Acierto who faces charges in connection with the importation of multi-billion pesos worth of illegal drugs last year.

Justice Secretary Menardo I. Guevarra confirmed the bounty but said he is “not privy to (its) funding source….”

“I will press the NBI, who’s under me, to search harder for these fugitives,” he said in a text message.

Mr. Acierto, who previously made headlines for linking President Rodrigo R. Duterte’s economic adviser Michael Yang to illegal drugs, was ordered arrested by Manila Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 35 on April 12 for the importation of shabu kept in magnetic lifters, along with seven others.

Seven others were also ordered arrested by the court: former Customs intelligence officer Jimmy S. Guban, Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) Deputy Director General for Administration Ismael G. Fajardo, Jr., Chan Yee Wah, Zhou Quan, Vedasto Cabral Baraquel, Jr., Maria Lagrimas Catipan, and Emily Luquingan.

This is in connection with complaints filed by the NBI and PDEA last year over the P2.4-billion shabu shipments sealed in two magnetic lifters found at the Manila International Container Port in August 2018 and P11-billion worth of the shabu in four magnetic lifters found in Cavite that same month.

The Department of Justice (DoJ) indicted them on April 8.

On the other hand, the prosecution dismissed for lack of probable cause the complaints against 40 others over the drug shipments, including BoC officials and employees.

Prosecutors, however, have endorsed to the Office of the Ombudsman for preliminary investigation the graft and dereliction-of-duty complaints against former BoC commissioner and now Technical Education and Skills Development Authority Director-General Isidro S. Lapeña and several others.

Fuel prices all up this week

OIL COMPANIES are raising the prices of petroleum products this week after the minimal adjustment a week ago. Gasoline prices will rise by P0.75 per liter (/L), diesel by P0.80/L and kerosene, P0.90/L. Last week, oil companies raised the price of gasoline by only P0.10 /L, and kept unchanged the cost of diesel and kerosene. For April, per liter prices of fuel products generally rose, except for the first week when these declined between P0.10 to P0.30. The same trend was observed in March. — Victor V. Saulon

Palace asserts no need for China consent in marine protected areas declaration in West Philippine Sea

THE PHILIPPINE government will not need China’s consent for its plan to declare some parts of the West Philippine Sea as marine protected areas, Malacañang said on Monday.

“Di ba, he already said that?” Mr. Panelo said in a news conference at the Palace on Monday when asked if the President is keen on declaring some parts of the highly-contested West Philippine Sea as marine protected areas.

Asked if the Philippines will need China’s consent for this move, he said: “No…. As far as we are concerned, that’s ours. You don’t have to ask any consent from anyone.”

He also noted that this move may “irritate” China, which is asserting territorial claims in the West Philippine Sea, but added that this would just be another matter for discussion between the two countries.

“Iyan ang claim nila. Ang claim din naman natin, atin (That is their claim. Our claim, on the other hand, is ours)…. O ‘di magni-negotiate tayo. Babalik tayo sa (then we will negotiate. We will go back to) negotiation,” he said.

He added: “That will be another irritant. Ang mangyayari niyan (What will happen is), if you declare a particular stand and they will declare another stand, o di may deadlock, di mag-uusap na naman tayo (Then we will just talk again).”

National Security Adviser Hermogenes C. Esperon, Jr. also said last week that the government is looking into the possibility of declaring Pag-asa Island and Eastern Kalayaan in the West Philippine Sea as marine protected areas.

He made this statement after the reported harvesting of giant clams by Chinese vessels in Panatag Shoal, another part of the disputed territory.

In his intervention during Session III of the Leaders’ Roundtable at the Second Belt and Road Forum in Beijing last Saturday, President Rodrigo R. Duterte said, “As an archipelagic state, the Philippines seeks to improve our collective capacity to manage and protect marine resources.”

He added: “As channels of transportation and communication, and a vital source of sustenance and livelihood, our oceans and seas connect and sustain us. It is thus our collective duty to promote their sustainable and peaceful use in accordance with international law.” — Arjay L. Balinbin