Home Blog Page 8216

Uneasy is the head

In a national emergency, the default response of every administration since 1987 has been to surrender absolute power to the President. The rationale being, only with unfettered authority can he lead the nation out of the crisis.

This reaction also comes with the admonition that citizens must fall in line and obey the commands of the Chief Executive. Which oftentimes means abandoning our adherence to human rights and civil liberties.

International human rights law obligates governments to implement robust and viable measures to address any public health emergency. This means restrictions on some rights and liberties can be allowed provided the same have statutory basis, are justified by scientific evidence as absolutely necessary, are non-discriminatory in application, and of limited duration. But this is definitely not an endorsement for states to consider a resort to one-man rule.

The response of the administration of President Rodrigo Duterte to the COVID-19 pandemic has been par for the course. The latest incarnation of the stubborn reliance on strongman-style emergency governance is Republic Act No. 11469 or the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act of 2020. As advertised, the sole purpose of this law is to give the “necessary special powers” to President Duterte to deal with this national health emergency.

Pertinently, the Supreme Court actually warned against this dalliance with authoritarianism in the case of David vs Macapagal-Arroyo (G.R. No. 171396, May 3, 2006), to wit: “Executive, legislative, and judicial powers are dispersed to the President, the Congress, and the Supreme Court, respectively. Each is supreme within its own sphere. But none has the monopoly of power in times of emergency. Each branch is given a role to serve as limitation or check upon the other.”

Correspondingly, it seems inappropriate to just automatically concede blanket authority to the President in times of national emergency because under the 1987 Constitution, Congress and the Supreme Court actually continue to perform their constitutionally mandated responsibilities. A national emergency does not actually sanction a return to presidential totalitarianism.

Furthermore, Congress in this time of national emergency has the responsibility to look at the bigger picture, which under the present circumstances means providing a coherent and comprehensive relief and recovery response to the COVID-19 pandemic. And sadly, our lawmakers have yet to devise a national action plan covering not just how to deal with the pressing demands of the crisis but also about how we can successfully rise up after the crisis ends.

But it is not just Congress which should not easily surrender power to the President in times of national emergency. One constitutional prescription that comes to mind, which must be reckoned with when evaluating executive action in a crisis scenario, is Article II, Section 25 mandating that “The State shall ensure the autonomy of local governments.”

Section 16 of the Local Government Code (LGC) or the General Welfare Clause is very pertinent as well, to wit: “Every local government unit shall exercise the powers expressly granted, those necessarily implied therefrom, as well as powers necessary, appropriate, or incidental for its efficient and effective governance, and those which are essential to the promotion of the general welfare.”

According to the late Senate President Nene Pimentel, the principal author of the LGC, this provision empowers local governments “to exercise just about any act that will benefit their constituencies.” Arguably, this makes local governments the logical primary responder to any non-military or police related emergency.

Interestingly, this seems to be the instinctive reaction of President Duterte as well. He alluded to this in his March 16 statement: “And he [the Mayor] can come up with any measure to protect public health, public interest, public order, public safety, and whatever is needed to make life more liveable in your place.” However, the President did a quick about face in his March 20 statement: “I know you have the mandate, but it is an emergency of national proportions thus the National Government then should call the shots.”

This evident equivocation from our Chief Executive is understandable. Tension between the national government and local governments will always be a huge challenge for any president. And managing this can even be more acute in the context of a national health emergency.

However, good leaders would put a premium on cooperation and collaboration between the two levels of government rather than on intimidation and domination. So, to see this administration resort to the latter is disappointing, especially since the President claims to be a champion of decentralization and federalism.

If the directive to lockdown Metro Manila and in Luzon were first extensively deliberated on by the President and his Cabinet with provincial governors and city mayors, it would not be unreasonable to imagine that implementation of the lockdown would not have been as chaotic and punishing for the people. At the very least, a coordinated effort between the national government and the local governments concerned would have produced a set of quarantine guidelines that was more accommodating to the realities of everyday life of the affected citizens.

Furthermore, had the local governments in Metro Manila and Luzon been given full responsibility for implementing the community quarantine, the national government could have put more attention and resources in addressing COVID-19 directly by preparing hospitals for the anticipated surge of infected patients, ensuring the safety and welfare of frontliners, and rolling out mass testing.

These did not happen precisely because there was no cooperative and collaborative approach from the very start. The focus of the administration’s immediate response was on strongly enforcing the lockdown order and imposing its unilateral directives on local governments.

Political leaders should never forget that Filipinos have an inherent fear of government itself becoming a force of terror. Hence, draconian measures will always trigger serious anxiety and will likely make the crisis an even heavier burden to bear for many Filipinos.

The ability of our leaders now to shift their thinking will be vital in preparing the country for the next national emergency. In fact, even at this point of the COVID-19 crisis, they should already be keeping note of the actions that achieve the best results for the people. And clearly, an approach genuinely anchored on intergovernmental cooperation and collaboration is proving to be far more effective than the default reliance on strongman-style governance.

Atty. Michael Yusingco is with the Ateneo School of Governance.

Life Blood of the Government amid the COVID-19 pandemic

These days, the future appears blurry due to COVID-19. We, in the Philippines, have not been spared from its ill-effects. With the enhanced community quarantine (ECQ) and other preventive measures being implemented, the usual routines of students, workers and businessmen stopped. Our daily lives drastically changed. Worse, most of the households and businesses are incurring bills without earning any income. 

To continue addressing this crisis, our government’s lifeline, taxes, must continuously flow in. For us, taxpayers, the first quarter of the year is usually the season for paying local taxes and for preparing financial statements since annual income taxes are due on April 15. The government collects the bulk of its funds during this season. Due to the pandemic, however, the government is in a dilemma on whether to enforce the collection of the much needed taxes vis-à-vis the present situation.

Recently, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) had to choose between collecting taxes or granting the pleas to extend the tax payment deadlines. Initially, the BIR issued Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 25-2020 stating that there shall be no extension on the deadline to file and pay the 2019 Annual Income Tax Returns (AITRs) due on April 15, 2020. But, under the RMC, the BIR allowed that amendments and payments of additional taxes on the amended returns be made until June 15, without imposition of penalties. Further, the BIR enumerated various online and manual methods of payment that can be utilized during the ECQ period.

Thereafter, amid the continuous rise in the number of COVID-19 fatalities and the strict implementation of the ECQ, the BIR changed its tone and issued several RMCs to extend the deadlines for the: 1.) filing and payment of taxes due on the AITRs and other various tax returns, 2.) submissions due to the BIR, and 3.) availment of the tax amnesty for tax delinquencies. As of this writing, the most recent RMCs are the following:

RMC No. 30-2020 amends the previous RMCs on AITRs and clarifies that the deadline for the filing and payment of the 2019 AITR (with the required attachments) is extended until May 15, 2020. It also reiterated that the filing and payment of taxes on all One-Time Transactions which fall due during the ECQ period shall be extended for 30 days from its due date. RMC No. 30-2020 also extends deadlines for other various returns falling due within the ECQ period.

RMC No. 30-2020 also provides a catch-all provision to extend the filing and submission of other reportorial requirements omitted therein (which deadline/due date falls within the ECQ period) for 30 days from its due date. In case the ECQ period is extended, the deadline to file and pay taxes (and the submission of reports and attachments falling with the extended ECQ period) shall be extended by 30 days. The extensions for deadlines/due dates are applicable to the entire Luzon and other jurisdictions which also adopted and implemented the ECQ and other similar measures.

Also, RMC No. 27-2020 and RMC No. 32-2020 extended the deadline for filing applications for VAT refund covering the quarter ending March 31, 2018 until April 30, 2020, and the deadline for filing CORTT Forms for final withholding taxes on dividends, interests, royalties paid on or before March 10, 2020 to April 30, 2020, respectively.

Even if silent on the non-imposition of penalties, the Tax Code provides that penalties and interests are imposed only upon failure to file tax returns and/or pay the taxes due therein within the date prescribed by law. Considering that these RMCs extended the period to file and pay taxes, no penalty and interest should be imposed if the taxes are filed and paid within the extended period.

Further, RMC No. 31-2020 extended the period to submit and/or file certain documents and correspondences (such as the replies and protests to assessment notices) with due dates falling within the ECQ period for 30 days from the date of lifting of the ECQ.

Noting that the deadline for availing of the tax amnesty on delinquencies will be on April 23, 2020, the BIR issued RMC No. 33-2020 extending the deadline until May 23, 2020.

Despite the decreased flow of taxes under the present circumstances, there is no question that our resiliency shall prevail. Bayanihan is apparent nowadays where businessmen and private establishments are extending deadlines to pay bills, donating food and medical supplies, while other government offices are stepping up efforts through distribution of relief goods, and extending deadlines for reportorial requirements and payment of obligations due. With discipline, empathy and positivity, we can rise and expect better days ahead.

 

This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and not offered as and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. The author is a Senior Associate of the Tax Department of the Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz Law Offices (ACCRALAW). She may be contacted through fecordova@accralaw.com or (02) 8830-8000.

March lockdowns are not price infectious, why?

When I saw the huge drop in electricity demand for March 2020 compared to March 2019, -5.5%, a result of business shutdowns and enhanced community quarantine (ECQ) in the second half of the month, I was expecting that March inflation would be something like 1.5%. I was wrong.

I checked other major economies with March 2020 inflation data, and it shows that deflationary pressure is building up fast in Europe, in places like Italy, Spain and France, but not so much in Asia (see the Table).

The reason for my rather bleak expectation for the Philippines’ March inflation is that I was expecting that less economic activities and business shutdowns means less income for the people and so their demand for various goods and services will decline, leading to decreased prices.

Of the 11 commodity groups that constitute the inflation basket, only Transport registered a price contraction in March, -1.8%, and it is understandable. But with closure of all malls and movie houses, all restaurants and bars (except food take out and delivery), I was expecting that at least these three commodity groups — Recreation and culture, Alcoholic beverages and tobacco, Restaurants and Misc. — would experience price contractions too. Did not happen. Prices of alcohol and tobacco products are now determined more by high and rising taxes, not consumer demand.

What spiked inflation instead was in Food and Non-alcoholic beverages, from 2.1% in February, it went up to 2.6% in March. The likely reason for this are those blockades and lockdowns starting March 15 when Metro Manila quarantine was implemented, worsened by the so-called “enhanced community quarantine” (ECQ) for Luzon by March 17. These adversely affected food supply — chickens, hogs, beef, vegetables, fruits, rice, etc. — with delayed or even spoiled products.

Government cash and food distribution started around March 27 when P65 billion of the P275 billion in new spending under the Emergency/Bayanihan law have been released to local government units and have given spending power to some poor households.

So three factors — high taxes on alcohol, tobacco, sugar products; blockades and delays in transportation of raw food products; and government cash handouts — were the main reasons why a decrease in economic activities did not result in significant decrease in prices.

I am expecting that inflation will decline significantly in the next two to three months, then go up in the succeeding months as the impact of Central Bank money printing will kick in.

Think positive

Hopefully none of our readers is positive for COVID-19. Nonetheless, I suggest that every one of us should think positive — meaning, we should consider ourselves positive for the disease. 

If that doesn’t make sense, believe me, it’s one effective way to prevent the spread of COVID-19. 

If we consider ourselves as possible carriers of the virus, this will remind us to strictly observe social distancing, and thus prevent us from infecting others, in case we are actually infected but are unaware of it (asymptomatic). This also prevents those who are positive from passing on the virus to us. 

The coronavirus is like a mole, an undercover spy, in a high security facility. No one knows who the mole is, although it is apparent that there is a security leak and it is being caused by someone. 

How to expose the mole? 

In a real-life spy search, as a first step, you should consider everyone a suspect. Then, you pretend to confide some “top secret information” (actually, a red herring) to one suspect. You then whisper a different version of the “secret” to a second suspect — and still another version to a third suspect   and so on. At the end of this process, you will have confided a different version of the ostensibly top secret information to each of several suspects. 

You can then easily trace the source of a specific variation of the information, should there be a leak. The mole can be identified through the process of elimination.  

Unfortunately, identifying a COVID-19 carrier is different from exposing a spy because, in this case, until testing is conducted, everyone should be considered a suspected carrier – including yourself. Thus, it is best to “think positive” — in other words, to consider yourself positive for the virus. 

This is important, because the two deadly characteristics of COVID-19 are its high transmissibility (it is highly infectious), and the seemingly mild symptoms that are initially apparent (like the symptoms of an ordinary cold or cough or even a flu). 

Note, however, that being infected with COVID-19 is not necessarily a death sentence. In fact, the majority of those infected recover. That’s the good news. 

The bad news is that, because the incubation period of the virus can vary from a few days to two weeks, you could, in fact, be a carrier without ever being aware of it. You could unknowingly pass it on to someone else.  

When your pulmonary system has already been overrun by the virus, it could be too late. You may have already infected others, before you can be quarantined.

Tragically, those you infect could be people you love.

To minimize the possibility of any of this happening, it is best to think positive. 

The sick joke is that COVID-19 is a “democratic disease” — it is non-discriminatory, it does not distinguish between rich or poor, male or female, young or old, famous or a mere face in the crowd.   

Such lofty personalities as Prince Charles of the United Kingdom and Prince Albert of Monaco have been found positive, as well as UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson; Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, wife of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau; Hollywood superstar Tom Hanks and CNN host-commentator Chris Cuomo, the younger brother of New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo. 

It was initially reported that the elderly are particularly vulnerable to the virus mainly because, like an old jalopy, older people are no longer in tip-top condition and not as resistant to illness as the young. However, reports from New York City, which has become the epicenter of COVID-19 in the US, reveal that more than half of the thousands found positive are from 18 to 49 years old. In fact, in the US, an infant was among the recent fatalities. And athletes, like NBA star Kevin Durant, have been found positive. 

Healthcare workers, particularly doctors and nurses, have also been infected — and hundreds have died. In an earlier column, I pointed out that Filipino doctors and nurses are on the coronavirus frontlines in large numbers, the Philippines being one of the world’s main exporters of healthcare professionals. 

Policemen and members of the military have been among the first responders to the coronavirus pandemic around the world, and this includes the Philippines. They have been tasked with ensuring public compliance with national lockdowns and social distancing directives. However, many of them have been sent to the frontlines without the necessary protective gear. 

I, frankly, fear for the members of the Philippine National Police and other public servants whose responsibility is the safety of the citizenry, even while they themselves are exposed to the disease. I also fear for their families whom they could infect.  

Now, at the risk of sounding flippant, I should point out that there are certain “positive” aspects of the pandemic. And I really mean positive, as in, something beneficial resulting from this crisis. 

I understand that the horrible Manila traffic problem, which authorities had given up trying to solve, has practically vanished. This has also resulted in cleaner air in Metro Manila, as has also been noted in other smog-afflicted cities of the world like Los Angeles and New York. 

A nephew posted on Facebook video footage of him driving up EDSA at a fast clip. The last time I visited Manila, my driver and I were literally crawling along EDSA. 

As a member of the executive committee of one of the largest Filipino-owned supermarket chains in the US and Canada, I noted the consensus that the pandemic may have significantly changed the buying habits of consumers — a trend that forward-looking businessmen should prepare for. I was impressed with the proactive way that the company’s management has responded to these changes. 

Amazon, which risked billions of dollars on the concept of online retail marketing, has benefited greatly from the pandemic. The traditional brick-and-mortar retail outlets have had to take notice, much more than they did during the holiday season, when Amazon took away a lot of sales from them. The COVID-19 crisis has made the importance of online selling a stark reality.

Home deliveries of meals and groceries by restaurants and supermarkets, a relatively new concept in technologically advanced America, may become a permanent service offering as a result of the pandemic.

My grandchildren, most of whom are in grade school, have also begun to adjust to onlinelearning, because schools have remained closed in the US. And Facetime has also made bonding with the kids possible in spite of the forced isolation. 

Of course, this has also exposed a digital divide in America, with poorer families being unable to afford computers and Wi-Fi connections. This digital divide is probably more acutely experienced in the Philippines. 

Finally, some friends have observed that the work-from-home regimen in Manila has resulted in husbands getting to know their families again, especially their children. While this situation does not necessarily apply in the US, where husbands usually go home early and spend time with their wives, or risk a divorce, Pinoy husbands are notorious for hanging out with the barkada (friends) after office hours and enjoying “one for the road” — that, aside from maintaining a second or even a third family. 

The lockdown decreed by the Philippine government has resulted in a virtual “house arrest” for erstwhile gallivanting PInoy husbands, resulting in family bonding. 

In this connection, a friend jestingly asked, “What about those who have more than one house?” 

My response: “Ask Erap.”

(gregmacabenta@hotmail.com

Sports apparel maker joins battle against coronavirus

AS THE country’s battle against the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rages on, various entities from different sectors have stepped up to the plate to do their share in the fight. One of these is local sports apparel manufacturer Team Rebel Sports (TRS).

Recognizing the shortage in personal protective equipment (PPE) for use of medical frontliners like doctors, nurses and hospital staff, TRS, which started business back in the 1990s, has dipped into its resources, joining forces with renowned fashion designer Michael Leyva to help fill up the urgent need.

“Actually, Michael Leyva approached us because he needed help,” said TRS owner Joel Cu.

“Of course, we cannot turn a blind eye on our modern-day heroes. That is why we immediately said yes to Michael. This for the country,” he added.

While admitting that COVID-19 has hit their business hard, forcing them to downscale its operations by 50% for one, Mr. Cu said considering what is at stake it was a no-brainer that they had to move into action and make a difference.

“This is an urgent matter we need to address since time is of the essence for our health workers. We may have lost possible income but we can easily make it up after this crisis. What’s important now are the lives at stake,” said Mr. Cu, whose company counts the Northport team in the Philippine Basketball Association and the Lyceum Pirates in the National Collegiate Athletic Association as among the teams they provide jerseys with.

Since forging the partnership with Mr. Leyva, TRS has been working nonstop at its factory in Antipolo to produce facemasks and protective suits.

They are targeting 900 suits and thousands of facemasks for distribution to different health facilities.

Each protective suit once done is packed in a Michael Leyva paper bag with the Bible verse, “So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand, — Isaiah 41:10.”

Mr. Cu said to safeguard the safety and health of their workers, TRS allotted a place for them to stay for the duration of the Enhanced Community Quarantine imposed in all of Luzon to help stop the spread of COVID-19.

As of this writing, confirmed COVID-19 cases in the country are at 3,660, with 73 recoveries and 163 deaths. — Michael Angelo S. Murillo

Weighing options

OVER the last few days, there has been marked speculation on whether the National Basketball Association can still resume its 2019–20 campaign. Whereas the initial shock that accompanied the league’s decision to suspend the season was quickly replaced by optimism, information trickling through the grapevine has it adopting a more negative stance of late. In part, it’s because the situation remains murky; the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues to claim thousands of lives and put countless others at risk every day, and the resumption of hoops operations — even if it is the premier hoops operations in the world — is far from the priority of all and sundry.

That said, there can be no denying the importance of sports (and of the NBA, in particular, as the most progressive league by far) to progress in a post-COVID-19 environment. And, in this regard, leading lights such as commissioner Adam Silver hold the responsibility of projecting a future in which some semblance of normalcy is restored. It’s why scuttling the season remains an absolute last resort, and why other options, no matter how seemingly improbable, keep getting evaluated. Hope fuels the constant assessment, even if the impression being given is that of a canoe leaking water and compelled to move against the tide.

Parenthetically, Silver’s interview with TNT’s Ernie Johnson, broadcast on Tuesday via the league’s Twitter account, underscored his refusal to give in. He was right when he said the flow of information has been far from ideal. “Interestingly enough, I think if you and I on March 12 had been asked that same question, both of us would have said, ‘It’s hard to imagine that three-plus weeks later, we wouldn’t have a better understanding of where we are.’” On the other hand, he remained steadfast in his intent to find ways to keep the season alive — even to the point of holding back on making any definitive decision unless and until he gets a much better grasp of the situation.

Which was why Silver argued that nothing can be set in stone. “Essentially, what I’ve told my folks over the last week is we should just accept that, at least for the month of April, we won’t be in a position to make any decisions.” He acknowledged that officials continue to look “at many different scenarios for restarting the season, but I think it honestly is just too early, given what’s happened right now, to even be able to project or predict where we will be in a few weeks.” That said, he disclosed that the NBA has moved from projecting specific scenarios to “listening” in view of all the uncertainty.

There can be no denying that Silver wants the season to restart because of financial considerations. Nonetheless, he made clear the principal purpose for doing so: “Beyond the virtue of crowning a champion, what will the symbolism be of major league sports starting back up in this country?” Interestingly, he noted anew that 99% of the NBA’s fans don’t go to the games, thereby enabling the league to look past tradition in terms of meeting their expectations in this day and age of quarantines and social distancing. And as a repository of society’s brightest prospects, it cannot but exhaust all options to ensure the season keeps from folding for good.

 

Anthony L. Cuaycong has been writing Courtside since BusinessWorld introduced a Sports section in 1994.

2020 Open Championship cancelled due to coronavirus

LONDON — This year’s 149th Open Championship due to be held at Royal St. George’s has been cancelled because of the coronavirus pandemic, The R&A announced on Monday.

A statement said the decision to scrap the 2020 tournament, scheduled for July 16–19 in Kent on England’s southeast coast, had been made with a “heavy heart” but was the only option.

It will be the first time the Open, the oldest of golf’s four majors, has not been held since 1945.

The Open was last held on the Royal St. George’s course in 2011 when Northern Irishman Darren Clarke claimed victory.

“We appreciate that this will be disappointing for a great many people around the world but this pandemic is severely affecting the UK and we have to act responsibly,” Martin Slumbers, Chief Executive of The R&A, said in a statement.

“I can assure everyone that we have explored every option for playing The Open this year but it is not going to be possible.”

The one silver lining for Royal St. George’s is that it will host the tournament next year instead. The 2021 event, which would have been the 150th, was to be held at St. Andrews. It will now return to the “home of golf” in 2022.

The Open is the only one of this year’s four majors to be cancelled because of the global health emergency.

This month’s Masters and PGA Championship have been postponed until Nov. 9–15 and Aug. 3–9, respectively.

The US Open at Winged Foot, New York was postponed on Monday, with a September date slated, the same month as the Ryder Cup.

Lowry disappointed 

Shane Lowry of Ireland would have been hoping to retain the trophy at Royal St. George’s.

“Obviously I’m disappointed that I won’t get to defend my title but people’s health and safety come before any golf tournament,” he said in a video posted on Twitter.

“I’m sure the R&A have thought long and hard about this. You can guarantee the Claret Jug is in safe hands for another year and I look forward to seeing you all in 2021.”

Preparations for staging the Open involve a huge logistical operation and the “build” would have begun soon in Sandwich on the Kent coast. Slumbers said it would have been unreasonable to put any extra pressure on the local authorities.

“We rely on the support of the emergency services, local authorities and a range of other organisations to stage the Championship and it would be unreasonable to place any additional demands on them when they have far more urgent priorities to deal with,” he said.

The R&A said tickets and hospitality packages purchased for the 2020 championship would transfer to 2021 with full refunds for those who cannot attend next year.

Apart from stoppages due to World Wars, the only other time the Open has been cancelled was in 1871 because there was no trophy — Tom Morris Jr. having been allowed to keep the Challenge Belt for winning the tournament three times in a row.

The British sporting calendar, like that across the world, has been decimated because of the coronavirus pandemic that by Sunday had claimed just under 5,000 lives in the UK.

Last week the Wimbledon tennis championships were also cancelled for the first time since World War Two, while the soccer, rugby and cricket seasons are all suspended. Reuters

No NBA decision until at least May, says Silver

THE NATIONAL Basketball Association does not expect to have a decision about the status of the 2019–20 season — currently suspended due to the coronavirus pandemic — until at least May, commissioner Adam Silver said Monday.

During a 29-minute video interview with TNT’s Ernie Johnson, Silver was asked if he had any clearer sense of when the league might return from its hiatus, which began March 11.

“The short answer is no,” Silver said. “Essentially what I’ve told my folks over the last week is that we should just accept that, at least for the month of April, we won’t be in a position to make any decisions. And I don’t think that necessarily means on May 1 we will be.”

Silver said the league initially began laying out several specific scenarios for a possible return, but the uncertainty of the pandemic made for too many moving parts.

“What I’ve learned over the last few weeks is we just have too little information to be able to make those sorts of projections,” Silver said.

All options, including a cancelled season, a shortened season that jumps into the playoffs or finishing the full scheduled slate, are on the table.

The regular season had about a month remaining when it was suspended, and the playoffs typically take about two months to complete. The 2020–21 regular season typically would begin in October, although Silver acknowledged that could be affected as well.

ESPN reported Monday that the NBA is looking at various COVID-19 tests that would provide results within a matter of minutes, which could help clear a major hurdle in returning to play.

During his interview, Silver also shed light on a Saturday conference call in which he and other commissioners from major sports leagues around the United States spoke with President Donald Trump. He said Trump wanted to express hope that sports can help inspire the country as it battles the virus.

“It wasn’t just a pep talk,” Silver said, “but I think it was a reminder of what the meaning is of sports to Americans, to our culture in particular.”

Trump told reporters Saturday, not long after the conference call, that he would like to see sports back in action with fans in attendance by August, although he declined to commit to that timeline.

Silver added that the NBA, which was the first major US sports league to shut down due to the virus, hopes to help set the pace in emerging from the current lockdown.

“We’d love to be part of the movement to restart the economy,” he said. “Of course, that can’t come in any way that would compromise safety.”

Meanwhile, the NBA sent a memo to teams on Monday laying out rules for meeting with draft prospects, according to multiple media reports. Teams will be permitted up to four hours of virtual interviews with a player, but there will be no in-person meetings of any kind until further notice. — Reuters

Phelps urges athletes to take care of mental health after Games delay

NEW YORK — Olympic great Michael Phelps has voiced his concerns over the negative impact on athletes’ mental health of the Tokyo Games postponement prompted by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Last month the International Olympic Committee decided to delay the Tokyo Games for a year as the global health crisis prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic hit the professional sports calendar and brought daily life to a grinding halt for millions.

“You go through something for four years and we kind of know exactly when it’s going to come and our bodies are ready for it, then we have to wait,” the retired swimmer, who won 28 Olympic medals, told NBC in an interview on Monday.

The 34-year-old American urged athletes to use the downtime as an opportunity to further hone their skills.

Mr. Phelps added that he had enormous empathy for athletes grappling with the delay, with the Olympics now scheduled to be held from July 23–Aug. 8 2021, and said it was imperative they were “taking care of their mental health.”

He raised his concerns just days after compatriot and four-time Olympic champion gymnast Simone Biles said she had cried at news of the postponement.

“It’s our life,” said Phelps, the most decorated Olympian of all time. “I’ve tried to replay what I would be going through emotionally at this very time if I was still competing — it’s hard to really comprehend it.” Reuters

Staying healthy at home by way of UA’s app offerings

WITH the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) forcing people to alter how they go about their lives, global performance brand Under Armour (UA) is helping from its end in dealing with the “new normal” by way of its mobile app offerings.   

Through MyFitnessPal and MapMyRun, Maryland-headquartered Under Armour seeks to help athletes and active people be healthy and on track of their fitness regimen even at home as current guidelines and restrictions are imposed amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

UA said the app offerings are rooted in performance just as how its products are known for.

MyFitnessPal is designed to help users track their nutrition and exercise, based on the goals they have identified and regardless of fitness level. Through it users are given a personalized experience that outlines benchmarks and determines the necessary nutrients and activity needed to achieve them.

For added motivation, the highly active MyFitnessPal community helps its 180 million users stay connected, helping one another to stay the course and finish strong.

To address the needs of the time, MyFitnessPal has temporarily unlocked select premium features that are now accessible to everyone in the app, including new recipe collections, such as “Pantry Staples” (easy to make recipes using common pantry items), a “Support Your Immune System” plan (a 14-day plan with daily tips and tasks to build immunity) and all workout routines, developed by the UA Human Performance Team and easily done at home. 

MapMyRun, meanwhile, is put up to complement the surge in interest in running and provides runners logging indoor miles (for now) with connected UA HOVR footwear access to Real-Time Form Coaching and a wealth of other data, including distance, speed, stride length, and more.

UA also said that on March 23 the 30-day Healthy at Home fitness challenge, which has end goal of pushing for healthy lifestyle despite the these trying times, was launched.

During the challenge, new recipes and routines, developed by the UA Human Performance Team, will be released daily. Michael Angelo S. Murillo

Ensuring secure video meetings during COVID-19 crisis

By Adrian Paul B. Conoza,
Special Features Writer, BusinessWorld

The measures implemented in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might have hindered people from gathering together as peers, teams, or organizations. Thanks to technology, though, people can still connect with each other while they are confined to their homes.

Video conferencing tools like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Hangouts Meet, among others, have been highly used for meetings and other tasks once companies shifted to a work-from-home setup. However, as the use of video conferencing increases during this crisis, the concerns over security and privacy have also been raised. Zoom, in particular, was under fire for issues found in its privacy and security features.

Those issues include the intrusion of hackers or trolls in video meetings, more known as “Zoombombing”; Zoom’s misleading claim of offering end-to-end encryption; and the discovered sending of data of the platform’s iOS app users to Facebook for advertising purposes, even if the user does not have a Facebook account.

In Zoom’s blog post responding to such issues, Zoom’s founder and chief executive officer Eric Yuan apologized for falling short of the community’s and its own privacy and security expectations. He added that Zoom has stopped adding new features over the next 90 days and is shifting all its engineering resources to focus on its trust, safety, and privacy issues.

Moreover, the platform has started requiring a password along with the meeting ID for users to join a meeting. There will also be virtual waiting rooms that will appear by default for the meeting host to manually add attendees.

While video conferencing platforms are doing their best to keep meetings secure, users themselves can set measures to ensure that their meetings will be protected from security risks.

For Jonathan Knudsen, senior security strategist at Synopsys Software Integrity Group, making sure a password is in place is the most important consideration in setting up a meeting online. It helps ensure that the meeting will contain only the people expected to be there.

“Use a strong password — something with letters, numbers, and symbols — that is long enough that it would be very difficult to guess,” Mr. Knudsen added in a statement. “Be careful also about sharing the meeting information. And finally, monitor the attendee list during the meeting to be sure you don’t see anyone unexpected.”

In terms of sharing meeting information, Aaron Zander, head of IT at HackerOne, warns that sharing meeting ID or URL can allow people to eavesdrop on sensitive conversations, record the voice or video of participants, and infiltrate a team’s new virtual workplace.

“With the Zoom boom taking over social media, be careful how much you share in your screenshot,” Mr. Zander advised. “Some meeting tools allow you to limit meetings to only people in your organisation or add a password, but not all do. It’s important to understand the link sharing options for file sharing. This includes video links and services like Zoom.”

Furthermore, ensuring the video conferencing tool protects the meeting and its data by means of encrypting data between participants is advised.

“Ideally you want outgoing content (video, audio, text, files) to be encrypted by each participant and decrypted when it arrives to the other participants. This ensures that your meeting content is transported over the network encrypted so that anyone eavesdropping on the network traffic will see only unintelligible encrypted data,” Mr. Knudsen said.

In addition, carefulness greatly helps in safe videoconferencing. For meeting recordings, it should be checked if the video conferencing tool encrypts recordings and requires a password or other authentication to view them.

Users should also be careful with the link to the video meeting. Omer Dembinsky, manager of cyber research at Check Point Software Technologies, shared that as a sharp rise in the number of “Zoom” domains being registered have been observed, users should be extra careful before they click a link.

“The recent, staggering increase means that hackers have taken notice of the work-from-home paradigm shift that COVID-19 has forced, and they see it as an opportunity to deceive, lure and exploit,” Mr. Dembinsky explained. “Each time you get a Zoom link or document messaged or forwarded to you, I’d take an extra look to make sure it’s not a trap.”

For more #COVID19WATCH contents, visit www.bworldonline.com/covid19watch.

RCBC raises P7.05 billion from bonds

RIZAL COMMERCIAL Banking Corp. (RCBC) raised P7.05 billion via its latest bond offer, which was more than twice oversubscribed.

RCBC said in a statement that it has listed its two-year fixed-rate bonds due April 2020 on the Philippine Dealing and Exchange Corp. on Tuesday, April 7.

The bonds carry a coupon rate of 4.848% per annum. They were offered from March 23-25, with the lender ending the period earlier than the original end date of March 27 due to oversubscription, as it initially targeted to raise just P3 billion.

The latest issuance is the fourth tranche of the bank’s P100-billion bond and commercial paper program.

Proceeds from the issuance will be used to support asset growth and to boost the bank’s liability structure.

”It (bond issuance) is an assurance for the investors in the capital markets that the bank will continue to be supportive of business activities despite the current challenges in the environment,” RCBC Senior Executive Vice- President and Treasurer Horacio E. Cebrero III said in a statement.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp. (HSBC) was the sole lead arranger and book runner for the bond issuance.

Meanwhile, RCBC Capital Corp. was the financial advisor. HSBC and RCBC served as the selling agents for the bonds.

Prior to this issuance, the Yuchengo-led lender also tapped the bond market through a P15-billion ASEAN green bond issuance in February 2019, an offering of P8-billion ASEAN sustainability bonds in June and the P7.5 billion it raised in November.

With this, RCBC has so far raised P37.55 billion from its bond issuances since 2019.

The bank’s net income grew by 25% to P5.4 billion in 2019, supported by the strong performance of its core business, high margins, strong trading gains, and higher fee-based income.

RCBC’s shares ended trading at P17.68 apiece on Tuesday, up by 1.61% or by 28 centavos from its previous close. — L.W.T. Noble