Home Blog Page 6958

Uncivil wars

The “uncivil war” President Joseph Biden wants to end has a counterpart in the Philippines. But while the barbaric war in the latter has been going on for five years with no end in sight, that in the US has entered a second, though equally troubling phase.

The US uncivil war is currently being driven by the crisis that is due not only to the over 27 million COVID-19 cases in that country, or to the US economy’s plunging into recession in 2020 and contracting by a record 33%, with recovery possible only in the third quarter of this year.

The crisis isn’t just the consequence of the Jan. 6 attack on Congress by Donald Trump’s thugs that has been described as an insurrection and even as an attempted coup d’etat. Neither did it happen only because the Republican Party continues to support the former President who fomented the insurrection and falsely claimed that he would have won a second term had he not been cheated by the Democrats.

And it isn’t just because the biggest threat against the Biden administration and the remnants of US democracy is the home-grown terrorism that Trump’s four years in office and hate-ridden rhetoric of violence fed and encouraged.

It is all of the above and more that comprise the US crisis, among them the likelihood that Trump will escape conviction in his impeachment trial that began on Feb. 9. If that happens, it will validate to his followers their belief in Trump’s lies, his conspiracy theories, and his self-aggrandizing, narcissistic leadership that fed the crisis in the first place. It will allow him or his surrogate to run again, and perhaps win, in 2024.

The reality is that US democracy, as besieged as it already is, is facing the gravest threat since World War II and the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the homeland. What makes it worse is that it is American citizens rather than foreign powers and terrorists who are responsible for it.

Speaking through one of the characters in his novel War and Remembrance, the American author Herman Wouk dismissed the possibility that the fascist ideology of any right-wing extremist group like the Ku Klux Klan, which was founded in the formerly slave-owning Southern states to keep African Americans from exercising their rights with the use of violence, would ever find its way into the political mainstream. Wouk’s character was responding to the claim that the equivalent of the rise to power of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi hooligans in Germany could also happen in the United States.

Wouk’s optimism was understandable. War and Remembrance was published in 1978, when such groups as the anti-evolution Christian fundamentalists; the modern day successors of the white supremacist Know Nothing Party of the 1850s; the Ku Klux Klan; the gun crazies who had armed themselves to protect their families from foreigners and to prepare for a nuclear apocalypse; the all-white, anti-immigrant groups that accuse people of color of taking their jobs and others were politically marginalized elements usually described as constituting the lunatic fringe of US society and politics.

Unfortunately, the members and sympathizers of the clones and successors of those racist and outrightly fascist groups turned out to be enough in numbers to elect Trump to the US Presidency in 2016. They bought into Trump’s anti-immigrant, anti-media, anti-Muslim, white-supremacist ideology because it mirrored their own. They thought his lies to be Bible truth, and believed his outrageous claim that he knew better than anyone else about COVID-19, which he said in early 2020 was “no worse than the flu” and would soon “go away.” They put the lunatic fringe in the political mainstream by electing Trump President and his accomplices senators and congressmen and women.

The consequences were devastating. Trump made the longstanding class and racial divides across the United States worse. He encouraged the use by the police of lethal force against protesters, and endangered journalists by labeling them “enemies of the people.” His incompetence and criminal indifference to the health and welfare of the populace led to the surge in infections and deaths from COVID-19.

Without a national plan on how to deal with the pandemic and its impact on the economy — he ignored the advice of his country’s best epidemiologists and economists — his administration left behind a crisis of monumental proportions.

Despite the urgent need for solutions to the vast panoply of problems confronting the US, Trump’s Republicans are hardly cooperating with the new administration for obvious political reasons. President Biden has nevertheless asked for bipartisan support for his anti-COVID-19 and other programs, and has urged the Trumpists to put an end to the “uncivil war” of which the Jan. 6 insurrection, say US intelligence agencies, could have been just a dress rehearsal for even more organized and widespread violence.

But Trumpism will survive to make the Biden administration’s platform of government difficult to implement. It will continue to threaten the US for years to come and will hasten its decline rather than make it “great again” as Trump had promised. But the war against immigrants, people of color, the media, science, and reason that Trump and his followers have been waging has ended, at least officially.

In the country of our sorrows, the savage and undeclared war against the poor; the independent press; regime critics; truth tellers; human rights defenders and lawyers; reformist officials; indigenous people; worker, farmer and student leaders; schools, colleges and universities; the Constitution and the rule of law; as well as against civility, reason, and truth has not only been unceasing despite the COVID-19 pandemic, but has even escalated.

The prospects for an end to that very uncivil war, about which only a very few care or are even aware, are not encouraging. Driven by the same ignorance and antipathy to truth and reason that make Trumpists so sure of the accuracy of their fact-challenged version of US reality, the partisans of the creeping insurrection — the ongoing putsch — against the Philippine Constitutional order are continuing their campaign for despotic rule through amending and even scuttling the 1987 Charter, supporting the deliberately deceptive call for a “revolutionary” government, enshrining violence and death as first principles in governance, and generally demonizing the exercise of Constitutional rights and democratic political engagement as crimes against their Medieval concept of the State as no more than an instrument of coercion.

Come 2022, the mass of the information-challenged, gullible, easily bought and terrorized electorate is not likely to do as US voters did last November. They would most probably keep in power the same dynasts and oligarchs whose incompetent, corrupt and despotic rule has made this country the basket case of Southeast Asia.

Only a sustained information program can help prevent that likely occurrence and put an end to the Philippine equivalent of the uncivil war in the US. But it will take the combined efforts of the independent press and media, the schools, colleges and universities, the sectoral organizations, the professions, the business community, the Church, civil society and anyone else truly concerned with the future of this country to make a difference.

The bad news is that no sense of urgency seems to animate these mostly democratic forces or the rest of the apathetic populace into proactive involvement in the admittedly difficult and increasingly dangerous enterprise of replacing lies with facts, and disinformation, cluelessness and ignorance with reason and truth.

 

Luis V. Teodoro is on Facebook and Twitter (@luisteodoro).

www.luisteodoro.com

Transfer public education to LGUs’ responsibility

A fundamental damage this lockdown caused that needs constant reiteration is that inflicted on education. To be more precise: years of declining quality in the nation’s educational system and standards finally finds its culmination in this lockdown.

The main culprit is the radically increased access to education, the imprudent permissiveness of liberal over-inclusiveness in education resulted not in improved learning and enlightenment for our society, not even raising the quality of our public discourse, but rather in depreciating and devaluing the concept of education itself.

The simple fact is, not everyone is qualified for a university education. And it’s actually not even desirable for everyone to go through university education.

Hence, it is emphasized that (even constitutionally) there is a difference between basic elementary (and secondary) education and college-level education. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights reflects this, pointing out that education is a “right” and should be free for “the elementary and fundamental stages.” Yet, with regard to college or “higher education,” such shall indeed be “accessible to all” but only on the “the basis of merit.” Which is as it should be.

Unfortunately, although it is commonsensical enough that university is not apt for everyone, political correctness and misconceived notions of social justice pushed to make education “inclusive.” This resulted in admissions and education criteria being adjusted to allow almost anyone to get a degree. And it’s also not far-fetched to think that commercial interests played a role.

The resultant consequences were far from unforeseeable: education was devalued and this lockdown revealed that for many of our citizens indeed, particularly amongst parents, education is “unessential.” Some even suggesting that it could be done away with, what with the push to cancel the ongoing school year.

Education has become merely a fashion statement or a tool to increase one’s income.

And ironically, those former and present students that hated schooling are now celebrating its decline. They ignore the fact, however, that the only reason they were able to get into school in the first place was because standards were lowered to allow them in.

University degrees used to be compelling because schools previously took pains to admit only those with clear talent, then sifting out or molding that talent even further. That rigorous process gave employers obvious incentives to prefer university graduates.

But if anyone can become a university graduate, then a degree means practically nothing.

Employers logically now need to search for other credible criteria to separate the good from the mediocre. Ironically, the alternative criteria employers are now starting to use: skills, adaptability, and work ethic — are actually more exclusive and difficult, requiring more effort, commitment, and humility on the part of the applicant. Although in these self-entitled times, perhaps that’s not a bad thing.

In any event, the lockdown (damaging as it may be to learning) can be viewed as a catalyst to spur true improvement in Philippine education.

And at the outset this is stated: the need for more funding is not a necessity. Indeed, for our cash-strapped country, pouring additional funding is something best now avoided. McKinsey & Co.’s 2007 study “How the world’s best performing schools systems come out on top” emphasized that. Rather than increase the budget, what a country needs to do to have better schools is to focus on three things: hire the best teachers; make the best even better; and act quickly and vigorously whenever pupils start to lag.

Counter-intuitively, so the study goes, one doesn’t need to engage in increased spending for better hires. The trick is to ruthlessly weed applicants, limiting from the very start the number of teachers to the very best. By making it harder to become a teacher, you then get to attract the best.

More school hours (or school years) were also discarded as factors, considering that Finnish students have shorter classroom time than other developed countries.

Which leads then to the core suggestion here: to merge the Department of Education (DepEd) and Commission on Higher Education (CHED), and then minimize that consequent body’s role.

Instead, the budget, management, and the providing for public education should be given exclusively and directly to the individual provincial governments. The DepEd/CHED should be limited to merely coordinating with the different LGUs (local government units) educational systems, as well as providing funding for specialized and limited national programs.

The DepEd/CHED should also be relieved of its function in relation to private schools, with policy and academic standards being left to self-regulation. Doing the foregoing (which actually needs no constitutional amendment) ensures that education is managed by the people who know it best: those on the ground and closest to the school’s community. It would also lead to greater academic freedom and flexible space for innovation.

It should also lead to healthy competition amongst the provinces as to who can provide the best schooling. This should then lead to defined niche areas for the different cities, which the provinces can now promote and develop.

 

Jemy Gatdula is a Senior Fellow of the Philippine Council for Foreign Relations and a Philippine Judicial Academy law lecturer for constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence.

https://www.facebook.com/jigatdula/

Twitter @jemygatdula

Mineski and Riot Games unveil tourneys lined up for the year

MINESKI Philippines and Riot Games Southeast Asia recently unveiled the roster of esports tournaments and activities lined up for staging this year.

In a virtual press conference on Tuesday, officials of the groups expressed their excitement over their partnership, which is geared towards building and sustaining the momentum of the growing esports and gaming industry in the Philippines through Riot’s biggest titles.

Also on board are Globe, Mineski’s long-time partner, and OPPO as their official mobile phone company partner for gaming.

“We are thrilled to introduce even more exciting competitive experiences for players across the Philippines alongside our partner, Mineski. Mineski’s network and expertise have enabled us to bring our esports vision to life, and we look forward to creating a memorable series of tournaments for fans of VALORANT and League of Legends: Wild Rift,” said Chris Tran, Head of Esports for Riot Games Southeast Asia, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau, in a statement.

Mineski, which has the official licenses to hold esports tournaments for VALORANT and League of Legends: Wild Rift here, will operate the official national tournaments for the titles through the Philippine Pro Gaming League (PPGL).

These tournaments will qualify the best teams to represent the country in Southeast Asian tournaments and the world championship.

Globe will be a presenting partner in the PPGL.

For Wild Rift, competition has been enhanced with the adoption of a points system, the first to be implemented for a mobile game.

Dubbed the “Wild Rift Points System by Globe,” the innovation will govern the total cash prize that the best performing teams in the national tournament will receive. The total prize pool amounts to P10 million and the points will also determine how a team can further advance into the Philippine Playoffs.

Pre-season for the Wild Rift Icon series is slated for March 20-21, 2021 and is touted by organizers as an exciting series of matches that pits eight professional esports teams against each other, including Globe Telecom’s esports team Liyab.

“Mineski has been an advocate of the local esports community for years. As we roll out these exciting tournaments through our partnership with Riot Games Southeast Asia and in collaboration with Globe Telecom and OPPO, we look forward to delivering truly exciting experiences and to discovering the next big names in gaming,” said Mineski Philippines country manager Mark Navarro.

Updates on registrations and broadcasts of the tournaments will be posted on the official PPGL Facebook page.

Local esports organizations, meanwhile, which are interested to apply as a partner to the national plans for the Wild Rift SEA Icon Series and VALORANT Challengers Tour can reach out to Mineski at riotgames@mineski.net. — Michael Angelo S. Murillo

PNVFI committees formed to help it operate better

NEWLY FORMED PHILIPPINE NATIONAL VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION, INC. has formed committees to handle its various affairs.

TO allow it to operate as organized as possible, newly formed Philippine National Volleyball Federation, Inc. (PNVFI) formed committees to handle its various affairs.

In the induction of its officers and first board meeting on Wednesday, the PNVFI set into motion its plans for local volleyball, including the appointment of officials tasked to lead the different groups within the organization.

Leading the appointees was veteran volleyball stakeholder Anthony Liao, who was named chairman of the National Team Department of the PNVFI.

Mr. Liao, commissioner of the Premier Volleyball League, will lead the process of forming the national teams, which will compete in international competitions.

He will be the chairman of the group, which has Ormoc City member and mayor as well former national team player Richard Gomez as secretary.

The committee is tasked to handle the national team for events like the Southeast Asian Games, Asian Games and other FIVB (International Volleyball Federation) competitions and provide continuity in the program.

It is geared towards effectively replacing the long practice of having the appointed head coach call for tryouts and name the members of the men’s and women’s volleyball teams.

In appointing Mr. Liao, PNVFI is banking on his extensive experience in Philippine volleyball where he has served in different capacities, including as team manager of the national squad.

“Mr. Liao was a former manager of the national team for many years. He also managed two of the most successful collegiate teams, De La Salle and Ateneo. He has a vast experience in managing teams and players and is highly versed on volleyball rules,” said PNVFI President Ramon Suzara of Mr. Liao, who was manager of the women’s national team that won the gold medal in the 1993 Southeast Asian Games in Singapore.

Mr. Liao accepted his appointment and vowed to work with the PNVFI and other members of his committee to succeed in the task given to them.

Also appointed was volleyball star and national team player Alyssa Valdez, who will lead the Athletes’ Commission of the PNVFI.

Joining her as members are fellow players Aby Maraño, Denden Lazaro, and Johnvic De Guzman.

The group is expected to provide the bridge between the players and the local volleyball federation for a more fluid communication for concerns and suggestions.

Others named to lead were Richard Palou (deputy secretary general for international affairs), Roger Banzuela (deputy secretary general for member relations), Carmela Gamboa (events council), Jerry Yee (technical and coaches), Prof. Robert Calo (refereeing and rules), and Karl Geoffrey Chan II (development).

Also appointed were Donald Caringal (marketing), Charo Soriano (beach volleyball), Benson Bocboc (Volleyball Information System), Dr. Jose Raul Canlas (Medical), Rodrigo Roque (finance), and Fr. Victor Calvo (legal and ethics).

The induction of the PNVFI officers was led by Philippine Olympic Committee President  Abraham Tolentino at The Vault restaurant at the Bonifacio Global City in Taguig.

The PNVFI officially got recognized by the International Volleyball Federation last weekend. It was formed in elections held on Jan. 25. — Michael Angelo S. Murillo

Kenin crashes out in second round

MELBOURNE — Reigning champion Sofia Kenin crashed out of the Australian Open in the second round on Thursday, slumping to a 6-3 6-2 defeat at the hands of world number 65 Kaia Kanepi on Margaret Court Arena.

The 22-year-old Kenin, who followed her Grand Slam breakthrough at Melbourne Park last year with a run to the final at the French Open, sprayed 22 unforced errors in the 64-minute contest against the experienced Estonian.

Ms. Kenin has been reduced to tears on court on several occasions since she came out of quarantine in Melbourne and admitted she has been struggling to contain her nerves at the prospect of defending the title. — Reuters

Bucs celebrate Super Bowl win with rowdy boat parade

PANDEMIC or not, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers celebrated their Super Bowl LV championship in style on Wednesday.

With thousands of fans lining the Hillsborough River near downtown Tampa, Buccaneers coach Bruce Arians enjoyed the moment with a beer in one hand and a microphone in the other.

“We have the best coaching staff in the National Football League (NFL). And we damn sure have the best players in the NFL,” the 68-year-old Arians said. “We’re going to keep the band together.”

The band leader is, of course, quarterback Tom Brady, who followed up his Super Bowl MVP-winning performance in a 31-9 victory over the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday by completing another pass three days later. Brady tossed the Lombardi Trophy from his boat to another, with tight end Cameron Brate making the catch.

“That was the best catch of my life,” Brate said, according to the Tampa Bay Times. “Unbelievable. That was the best catch of my life. If I had dropped that? I think I would’ve had to retire.”

Retirement doesn’t appear to be on the table for Arians and tight end Rob Gronkowski this time around. Gronkowski, in fact, celebrated on Wednesday with his shirt off and beads around his neck.

On the heels of his record fifth Super Bowl MVP award, the 43-year-old Brady appeared to be a bit tipsy after making it safely back to land. Third-string quarterback Ryan Griffin was seen helping him off the boat. — Reuters

Vulnerable

National Basketball Association habitués who believe the Lakers to be on track for a successful title defense might want to rethink their position. Not that the stalwarts of the purple and gold aren’t capable of taking the measure of the rest of the league. To the contrary, their roster makeup — shored up during the shortest offseason in the history of pro hoops — appears even better equipped to contend for the hardware the second time around. Unfortunately, their showing of late has been inconsistent at best; in proving unable to continually translate potential to practice, they have looked not just vulnerable, but vulnerable against supposed also-rans.

To be sure, the Lakers remain in the NBA’s upper echelon; their travails notwithstanding, they’re just one game off the top spot in the Western Conference. And, yes, they still have nearly three-quarters of the season to right the ship, not to mention allow vital cogs Anthony Davis and Alex Caruso to recover from injury. On the other hand, they’ve become alarmingly unstable, and from the get-go; extremely slow starts have compelled them to play catch-up ball against supposedly inferior opposition. Yesterday, for instance, they barely overcame an otherwise-slumping Thunder following an uphill climb that left them gassed in the end.

Consider this: Not since November 1991 have the Lakers been involved in three straight matches that required overtime to settle. And, in each of the contests, they had to rely on the heroics of Most Valuable Player candidate LeBron James to get them over the hump. Heading into the 2020-21 season, their depth was supposed to allow him to rest for significant stretches and preserve his 36-year-old body for the playoffs. Instead, his minutes have trended in the wrong direction in the face of their struggles. They simply had no choice but to play him 46, 43, and 41 minutes.

James has put on a brave face in his post-mortems. He says he doesn’t get tired, and, for the most part, he has delivered in the clutch. There’s also a reason he hasn’t sat out a single outing so far; he’s gunning for a fifth MVP award to underscore a point. On the other hand, Father Time is undefeated, and, for all his protestations, he’s not invincible. And if he’s exerting effort just to lead the Lakers to victory in Regular Season Game Number 26 of 72, there’s a problem that needs to be addressed, and fast. Else, he may find himself meeting one objective at the expense of another.

 

Anthony L. Cuaycong has been writing Courtside since BusinessWorld introduced a Sports section in 1994. He is a consultant on strategic planning, operations and Human Resources management, corporate communications, and business development.

Do you want to be resuscitated? This is what you should think about before deciding

Every day, in every hospital, doctors and nurses respond to “code blue” situations. This is an emergency alert for when a patient’s heart stops beating, called a cardiac arrest.

To save the patient’s life, medical and nursing staff will often administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). CPR involves repeated chest compressions, artificial breathing, use of medications and an electric shock to jump-start the heart (defibrillation).

The aim is to restore a person’s heartbeat and blood pressure to normal, and in turn to restore life. CPR must be initiated quickly as brain cells rapidly die without blood and oxygen.

Patients admitted to hospital are often surprised when their doctors ask: “If your heart were to stop beating, would you want CPR or not?” But in every code blue doctors need answers to the same two questions. First, whether the clinical team considers CPR would be an effective treatment; and second, whether the patient wants CPR.

If a person has a cardiac arrest outside hospital, it is usual, and expected, that bystanders begin CPR, use a defibrillator if available, and call an ambulance.

CPR is taught in first aid courses and defibrillators are widely available in public places such as airports and sports grounds. Time is of the essence, so having trained community members is important.

In a hospital setting, though, the decision to administer CPR is more nuanced. It’s built on a discussion around the patient’s medical condition and, importantly, takes into account their wishes.

Clinicians in Australia have provided examples of some different perspectives on this discussion:

Some of [the patients’ relatives] are absolutely aghast that we might even suggest not to resuscitate […] they bring their loved one into hospital to get better.

A lot of people […] just say, ‘No, I’ve had a good innings, just let me die.’ […] Often I find it’s families who have the objection.

CPR was developed and initially applied to resuscitate people with specific medical conditions such as an acute myocardial infarction (a heart attack).

When a cardiac arrest occurs because of a heart attack or other heart condition, there’s a reasonable chance CPR will re-start the heart and save the person’s life. A recent Australian study looking at people who had a cardiac arrest in hospital showed 41.5% of people who were admitted due to heart problems survived with good neurological function.

Expanding the use of CPR more broadly to every disease that causes the heart to stop beating seems like common sense. But this is not necessarily the case.

For older hospitalised patients (aged over 67 years in this research) with chronic diseases — such as heart failure, kidney disease, cancer or diabetes — their chance of surviving a cardiac arrest and leaving the hospital alive is around 11-15%. Chances of survival are slightly better in older patients without a chronic illness (17%).

For patients in the late stage of their life, due to advanced illness or severe frailty, their chance of survival is almost zero.

CPR is not always an appropriate treatment. The decision to perform it needs to be made carefully, especially when it’s highly unlikely to restore a patient’s heartbeat.

Unlike the popular media portrayal of CPR, not every survivor of cardiac arrest returns to their previous level of functioning.

Patients may survive but with some brain damage. This could range from minor damage with trivial functional effects such as being forgetful; to moderate damage with serious functional effects such as a change in personality and needing help with everyday activities; to severe damage with catastrophic functional impairment eventually leading to death.

CPR may revive a heart that has stopped beating, but it doesn’t always restore a person back to a life they had or want. It may also do harm by reviving a person who does not want to continue living and would have preferred their disease to follow its natural course. When CPR is performed on a patient who doesn’t want it, it disrupts a gentler dying process, transforming it into an impersonal medical event.

When a cardiac arrest happens, there’s no opportunity to ask the patient what they want at that time. In hospital, it’s routine to provide CPR for patients in cardiac arrest unless there is a medical order to withhold it, or if the patient has completed an advance care directive refusing CPR. This is often referred to as a “do not rescusitate” order.

Avoiding harm from inappropriate or unwanted CPR requires planning ahead and being prepared to have a difficult conversation.

We have launched an animated film, The Inappropriate Question, to help people better understand why these conversations are important.

Discussing CPR is upsetting for some patients, because raising the possibility of death is confronting. It’s also harder to discuss this when a person has just been admitted to hospital for treatment and is expecting to recover.

But patients have the right, and usually want, to be involved in their own treatment decisions. The challenge is how we reconcile this wanting to know and wanting to be involved in decisions, with not wanting to be upset by knowing.

CPR is an important treatment. When used appropriately, it saves lives. But when applied injudiciously it can cause distress and avoidable harm.

Advance care planning is one way to start thinking about this long before a person is seriously ill. Particularly if you’re older and have chronic medical conditions, have that discussion with yourself, your loved ones and your medical team.

Philippines to get China-donated vaccines this month for troops, medical staff

MANILA – The Philippines is set to receive 600,000 doses this month of Sinovac Biotech’s COVID-19 vaccine donated by China, a portion of which will be used to inoculate military personnel, a senior government official said on Thursday.

Presidential spokesman Harry Roque told a regular news conference the Feb. 23 arrival of the vaccines is certain, but they would not be administered without the approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

So far, only shots developed by AstraZeneca and the vaccine of Pfizer and BioNTech have been approved for emergency use in the country.

Roque said regulators have allowed “compassionate use” of 10,000 doses of a vaccine developed by China’s Sinopharm for President Rodrigo Duterte’s security detail.

Roque said 100,000 of the 600,000 Sinovac doses will be given to soldiers and the rest for medical workers.

The Philippines aims to start its mass vaccination programme using 117,000 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine secured through the COVAX international vaccine-sharing facility, which are also due to be delivered this month.

The Philippines has negotiated supply agreements with Moderna, Gamaleya, Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sinovac, Novavax for 148 million doses of coronavirus vaccines, the bulk of which are is expected to arrive in the second and third quarters of this year.

It is aiming this year to inoculate 70 million adults, or two-thirds of the country’s 108 million people, to achieve herd immunity.

The Philippines has recorded 541,000 infections, including 11,400 deaths. — Reuters 

Tech startup Teko rolls out appliance after-sales system 

By Patricia Mirasol

Teko Solutions Asia Inc. recently announced the nationwide integration of its appliance after-sales service system, Complete Order Management System (COMS), with all the leading brands of Concepcion Industrial Corp. (CIC), an air conditioning, appliance, and industrial solution provider. Among the said brands are Carrier, Condura, Midea, Toshiba, and Kelvinator.

CIC is the first major client of the after-sales service system. 

“Our customers are the core of our business and this inspires us to continuously improve ways of serving them. With COMS, we aim to provide our customers and partners a seamless overall experience,” said Raul Joseph A. Concepcion, CIC’s chairman & CEO, in a press statement. 

COMS is an end-to-end, white label, Software as a Service (SaaS) solution that digitizes the entire after-sales service process. It connects the after-sales teams of appliance and electronics manufacturers with customers, service providers, and business partners in a single cloud platform.

With COMS, CIC’s after-sales organizations gain more efficiency, access to real-time service data, and synchronized collaborations with all its partners at a significantly lower technology cost than legacy (or old) systems.

“This is not a broad solution; it was specifically designed for the after-sales of the appliance and electronics industry,” said Teko in an interview with BusinessWorld. “It connects all the aftersales partners within the field (service centers, technicians, dealers, call centers) on a single cloud platform, with all the necessary features in a cost-effective manner.”

Teko is a technology startup launched in September 2017 that helps connect households and businesses with professional appliance service technicians. Teko also powers the after-sales systems of appliance manufacturers, distributors, and extended warranty providers. 

The startup’s other solutions apart from COMS are Teko.ph, a platform for households and businesses to place service request orders, and Teko Pro, a service for extended warranty providers and new market entrants in need of a pool of professional technicians and back-office operations.

House won’t tackle ABS-CBN franchise, Speaker says

Philippine broadcaster ABS-CBN Corp.’s franchise application will have to wait until the next Congress to be elected in 2022, Philippine House Speaker Lord Allan Velasco said.

The House of Representatives will prioritize economic bills including a proposal for another pandemic relief measure, Velasco said in a statement.

President Rodrigo Duterte on Feb. 8 said he won’t allow ABS-CBN to operate a free-to-air television channel even if it secures a new franchise from Congress. — Bloomberg

Dollar struggles for traction after soft U.S. inflation

SINGAPORE – The dollar was pinned near two-week lows on Thursday, as softer-than-expected U.S. inflation and another Federal Reserve promise to keep interest rates low reinforced expectations of meagre returns from the reserve currency.

The Australian dollar sat just below a two-week top touched overnight, while the euro held at $1.2116, near its highest since Feb. 1. Sterling, also boosted by receding expectations for negative interest rates in Britain, sat just shy of Wednesday’s nearly three-year peak of $1.3865.

Morning moves were slight and Asia trade was thinned by Lunar New Year holidays in Japan and China. Against a basket of currencies the dollar sat at 90.428 after touching a two-week trough of 90.249 in the wake of U.S. inflation figures.

U.S. core inflation last month was zero, data showed on Wednesday, against market expectations of 0.2%.

In a speech, Fed Chair Jerome Powell focused on still-high unemployment and re-iterated that the central bank’s new policy framework could accommodate annual inflation above 2% for some time before hiking rates.

“In other words, easy policy is going to stay there for a long, long time, and that should be negative for the U.S. dollar,” said Westpac currency analyst Imre Speizer.

“I think it’ll be something that sits in the background, as just a reminder that the U.S. dollar can’t go up while it’s got that easy policy relative to everybody else.”

The dollar had pared some of its losses against other majors a little bit after a selloff in U.S. tech stocks dampened financial markets’ upbeat mood. The safe-haven Japanese yen hit a two-week peak of 104.41 per dollar overnight and last traded a fraction softer at 104.62 per dollar.

Bitcoin, sometimes viewed as a hedge against inflation, has dropped about 8% from Tuesday’s record high and traded at $44,277 on Thursday.

Inflation is under the spotlight as economists expect pent-up demand and a low-base effect from last year’s shocks to drive jumps in headline figures by the spring time, which some investors think could test the Fed’s resolve.

In New Zealand, for example, where the virus is well contained, surging accommodation prices have inflation running above expectations and investors have scaled back what had been further rate cut expectations.

“The RBNZ arguably face quite a different communication challenge (to the Fed), with the demand pulse in New Zealand in a much better position than anyone dared hope,” ANZ Bank analysts wrote in a note to clients on Thursday.

“The RBNZ will welcome this, but continue to highlight the need for cautious patience.”

The New Zealand dollar was broadly steady at $0.7205 on Thursday.

Later on Thursday, European Commission economic forecasts are due, as are U.S. labour market figures, with investors looking to the data to gauge the relative progress in recovery. – Reuters