Home Blog Page 12497

Relearning Islamic history in the Philippines

Starting tonight, until tomorrow night, we join our Filipino Muslim brothers and sisters in celebrating Eid al-Fitr or the Feast of Breaking the Fast. This feast, an important religious day observed by Muslims worldwide, and which we mark with a national holiday tomorrow, marks the end of Ramadan fasting for Muslims.
Ramadan, of course, is the Islamic holy month of fasting, which is 29 or 30 days of dawn-to-sunset fasting by Muslims. And, like the Chinese lunar calendar, Islam also follows a lunar calendar that is determined by the observation of the phases of the moon by religious authorities. As such, actual feast dates vary from country to country.
In a country said to be predominantly Roman Catholic, one cannot help but wonder why the national government chooses to observe Eid al-Fitr, or the Chinese New Year for that matter, with the declaration of a national holiday. In my opinion, however, the declaration is fitting, as Eid al-Fitr and the Chinese New Year are both just as Filipino as Christmas Day, New Year’s Day, or Philippine Independence Day.
Catholicism didn’t arrive until the Spaniards first came in 1521, and the first Spanish settlement didn’t start until 1565 in Cebu. On the other hand, the Chinese first arrived on our shores sometime in the 9th century. But the first Chinese settlement came in 1594 in Binondo, which is known as the world’s first Chinatown overseas. The Chinese pirate Limahong’s attack on Manila was in 1574.
Available literature on Islam in the Philippines indicate that it, in fact, has an even longer or earlier history in the Philippines than Christianity itself – by 200 years, I believe. It is said that Islam first came to our shores in Mindanao in the 13th century, making it the oldest recorded monotheistic religion in the Philippines. Islam was reportedly brought by Muslim traders from the Persian Gulf, Southern India, and from several sultanate governments in the Malay Archipelago.
Muslim traders were followed by Muslim missionaries in the late 14th and early 15th. Sultanates began to form in Mindanao and Sulu, as well as Manila. Thus, names like Sultan Kudarat and Rajah Lakandula and Rajah Suleyman and Rajah Matanda became part of Philippine history and its quest for independence.
For some reason, I don’t recall having taken up any part of Islamic history in the Philippines while I was in school in the 1970s to the 1980s. Even History 1, Philippine history, as taught as a General Education subject at the State University during my freshman year didn’t seem to tackle any part of Islam’s history in our country.
Islam
I find this curious considering the long history of the Sultanates, and how the Mindanao Muslim territory question has permeated Philippine political history in the last 50 years. Perhaps there should be a retelling of Islamic history in the country, particularly in schools, to help put things in perspective, and in recognition of the contributions of Islam.
As early as 1380, an Arabian trader by the name of Karim Al Makhdum reportedly reached the Sulu Archipelago and later established Islam in the country. He established the first Muslim mosque in the Philippines in Barangay Tubig Indangan on Simunul Island in Tawi-Tawi. To date, after more than 600 years, a mosque still stands in the area. And, I believe two wooden posts of the reconstruction of the mosque in the 17th century still remains on site today.
Makhdum, in fact, was buried on Simunul Island. I was told he has a tomb there, near the mosque that he had built, and that Muslims visit the area to pay homage to the man who first brought Islam to the country. Unfortunately, that a 638-year-old mosque, or at least its remains, can be seen on an island in Mindanao — and the remains of the man who started Islam in the country is there as well — remains unknown to most of us.
Makhdum’s tomb or grave, as well as the six centuries-old mosque, are precisely the kind of historical sites that should be restored and promoted. They are not simple places of interest but actual cradles of Philippine history, particularly of the pre-Hispanic period. A lot of Spanish-era Catholic churches nationwide have been categorized as heritage sites. We should do the same particularly for structures that preceded the Spaniards.
It also in this line that I support the call to restore or rebuild the Royal Palace of the Sultanate of Sulu in Maimbung, Sulu. Maimbung is the seat of the Sultanate, which was founded in 1405.
The Daru Jambangan (Palace of Flowers) in Maimbung was the royal palace of the Sultan of Sulu since historical times. But it was destroyed in 1932 by a huge storm. Only a few arches and posts now remain. I believe the Palace, with the help of the government, should be rebuilt.
While the actual Sultanate of Sulu no longer exists, it also played a significant role in Philippine and Mindanao history. And, if restoring the Palace can help people learn the Sultanate’s history, and its role particularly in foreign relations in the past as well as our linkages to Sabah, then this should be a worthwhile endeavor. A well-rebuilt Palace will also be a major tourist attraction.
The Spaniards never managed to completely suppress the Muslims in Mindanao. The Americans, during the colonial period, did not have much success either.
In this sense, Muslim Mindanao is the biggest cultural group that can be considered not completely “conquered” among Philippine ethnic groups. This, in my opinion, should be a source of pride, and should be heralded as a sterling example of a people defending their freedom and independence from foreign invaders.
 
Marvin Tort is a former managing editor of BusinessWorld, and a former chairman of the Philippines Press Council
matort@yahoo.com

Trump’s mostly meaningless summit with Kim

By The Editors
Bloomberg
THE world can be glad of one thing after US President Donald Trump’s summit meeting with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un: They’re still talking. But that, by itself, does little to reduce the North Korean threat.
The joint statement issued in Singapore was vague.
Kim didn’t confirm and extend a moratorium on testing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles; he didn’t say he’d detail his arsenals or open them to inspection. The promise “to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula” is meaningless: North Korea has consistently used that formulation to suggest it might give up its nukes one day — so long as the US does as well.
Despite Trump’s claim to have achieved something that eluded his predecessors, previous US administrations extracted more specific commitments from Pyongyang, only to see them breached.
Kim, though, did get something valuable — a meeting with a sitting US president (something his father and grandfather never accomplished, despite great efforts). This will bolster his position at home. He also appears to have talked Trump into suspending joint US-South Korea military exercises — another longtime demand — in exchange for dismantling a missile-engine testing site that the North may, in fact, have already destroyed.

Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un
AFP

Granted, the US concessions are mostly reversible.
As Trump noted, sanctions remain in place. Military exercises could be restarted if the North drags out future talks. (Doubts among allies about US reliability will be harder to repair.) Given how quickly the summit was thrown together, no one should have expected a credible, comprehensive deal.
It’s important to remember, however, that from now on US leverage will dwindle.
China has already called upon the United Nations to relax sanctions, and its own enforcement efforts are sure to weaken. South Korea, too, will be looking for ways to begin normalizing economic relations with the North and might resist harsher measures should they be necessary. If Kim ever feared that Trump might order a preemptive military strike, those worries have subsided.
What’s needed now from the US president isn’t further showmanship but quiet and methodical diplomacy, closely coordinated with China, South Korea, and Japan. The US should make no more unrequited concessions and insist on actions and a relatively short timetable to freeze, cap, and then dismantle the North’s nuclear and ballistic-missile arsenals. The longer this goes on, the worse the prospects of an eventual and genuine success.

Strong end game propels GlobalPort to upset of SMB

By Michael Angelo S. Murillo
Senior Reporter
GLOBALPORT Batang Pier showed grit and a lot of determination on Wednesday night to get back on the winning track in the Philippine Basketball Association (PBA) Commissioner’s Cup by defeating the defending champions San Miguel Beermen, 98-94, at the Mall of Asia Arena.
Undermanned heading into the homestretch of the game, GlobalPort proved itself hard to handle nonetheless when it found its groove to improve to 4-4 in the tournament and stopped a two-game losing streak while sending the Beermen (3-4) to their first defeat in their last four matches in the midseason tournament.
San Miguel got off to good start against GlobalPort, racing to a 15-9 advantage in the opening seven minutes of the first quarter.
The Batang Pier though would keep itself in the game, narrowing the gap to 19-18 with 1:47 left on the clock.
June Mar Fajardo then led an 8-5 finish to the quarter to give the Beermen a 27-23 lead at the end of the opening 12 minutes.
San Miguel picked up where it left off at the end of the first canto, outgunning GlobalPort, 13-8, to extend their lead to nine points, 40-31, by the 6:18 mark of the second quarter.
Forward Sean Anthony would lead a charge back by the Batang Pier in the next five minutes to cut their deficit to one point, 45-44.
But the Beermen would eventually survive the onslaught of the Batang Pier, holding a 51-47 lead by the halftime break.
Much like in the second period, San Miguel would go on a fast start in the third canto.
It stretched its lead to 12 points, 71-59, midway into the quarter.
GlobalPort tried to claw its way back but San Miguel stayed on top of things, up, 79-71, heading into fourth period.
In the payoff quarter it was the Batang Pier’s turn to jump-start things, coming to within three points, 83-80, with 8:17 remaining in the game.
Just as the momentum started to build up for the Batang Pier, they saw their import Malcolm White ejected after incurring his second technical foul in the game.
But GlobalPort was undeterred by the absence of their import as it kept coming back, towed by Mo Tautuaa, Stanley Pringle and Nico Elorde.
The Batang Pier tied the count at 86-all with 5:14 to go on the game clock.
The two teams jockeyed for momentum thereafter, trying to gain the leverage as time wound up.
The score stood at 90-all entering the last two minutes.
Mr. Pringle gave the Batang Pier the lead, 92-90, with 1:50 left only to be answered by Mr. Fajardo 18 seconds later to level the count anew at 92-all.
Mr. Elorde then unleashed a huge three-pointer with 48 ticks to go to give GlobalPort a 95-92 lead, forcing the San Miguel to sue for time.
Mr. Balkman pushed the Beermen to within a point, 95-94, with 37 seconds remaining.
Mr. Tautuaa though gave GlobalPort more elbow room to work on with a basket with 19 seconds left.
It turned out to be a good enough distance for the Batang Pier en route to bagging the big win.
Mr. Pringle tallied 22 points, eight rebounds and six assists for GlobalPort while Mr. White finished with 25 points and 10 rebounds before being ejected.
Mr. Balkman had 33 points, 13 rebounds and six assists to lead San Miguel with Mr. Fajardo adding 20 points and Alex Cabagnot 19.
“We played together today, played with emotion. Our defense was key. We were able to stop the Beermen. Malcolm’s loss was big but we kept our focus and just played,” said player of the game Pringle after their win.
GlobalPort next plays on June 20 against the Phoenix Fuel Masters while San Miguel returns on June 16 against the TNT KaTropa.

Peso weakens to hit P53:$1 level

THE PESO plunged on Wednesday, sinking below the P53-per-dollar line to log a new 12-year low ahead of the policy meeting of the US Federal Reserve.
The local currency closed Wednesday’s session at P53.23 against the dollar, 28 centavos weaker than the P52.95-per-greenback finish on Monday.
This is a new low for the peso in nearly 12 years or since it closed at P53.55 against the greenback on June 29, 2006.
The peso traded weaker the whole day, opening the session at P53 versus the greenback, which was already its best showing for the day. Meanwhile, its intraday low stood at P52.26 against the US currency.
Dollars traded rose to $773.17 million on Wednesday from the $653.1 million that switched hands last Monday.
Traders interviewed Wednesday, June 13, said the peso weakened as the dollar strengthened overnight ahead of the Fed policy meeting.
“The dollar-peso close at a new 12-year high of P53.23…partly due to the widely expected +0.25 Fed rate hike that led to stronger US dollar versus most [Southeast Asian] currencies,” Michael L. Ricafort, Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. Economics and Industry Research Divison head, said in a text message on Wednesday.
Markets are expecting the Fed to raise its benchmark rates by a quarter of a percentage point at its meeting this week amid low unemployment and higher wages.
This follows a similar rate hike in March. Currently, the federal funds rate stands at a 1.5%-1.75% range.
“[The weaker peso was due] to the stronger dollar as markets are waiting for the Fed to hike its rates this month again,” a trader said in a phone interview.
“If the Fed is expected to hike and the other major central banks like the Bank of Japan and probably the European Central Bank will not hike, you see higher interest in the rates in the US, affecting the dollar.”
The trader added that the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) was not seen intervening in the peso-dollar trade during the trading session, causing the local currency plunge.
As the country’s monetary authority, the BSP sometimes conducts “tactical interventions” to temper any sharp swings that may cause the peso to appreciate or depreciate.
The wider trade deficit as well as the lower foreign exchange reserves, according to the trader, also affected the peso’s strength.
On Thursday, the trader expects the peso to move between P53.10 and P53.35 versus the dollar, while another trader sees the local unit trading within the P53-P53.30 range.
“There might be some profit-taking due to the local shortened trading week ahead of possible hawkish cues from the policy meeting of the European Central Bank on Friday,” the second trader noted. — Karl Angelo N. Vidal

Shares plunge ahead of central bank meetings

By Arra B. Francia, Reporter
SHARES fell on Wednesday as investors remained on the sidelines ahead of various central bank meetings overseas and the peso’s decline to a new 12-year low.
The 30-member Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) gave up 2.16% or 168.32 points to 7,602.98, declining steeply compared to overseas counterparts. The all-shares index also went down 1.59% or 75.19 points to 4,629.35.
“I think it’s risk-off sentiment ahead of major central banks’ meetings, Fed (US Federal Reserve), ECB (European Central Bank), and BoJ (Bank of Japan), and expected non-trading day on Friday,” IB Gimenez Securities, Inc. Research Head Joylin F. Telagen said via text.
The US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is holding a two-day policy meeting. The ECB will meet on June 14, while the BoJ is also set to review policy from June 14 to 15.
Timson Securities, Inc. Trader and Marketing Head Mark Levinson R. Koa also noted that the market dropped due to fears of another rate hike by the FOMC, noting the larger net outflows seen Wednesday, June 13.
The market recorded its 20th day of net foreign selling on Wednesday, with net outflows swelling to P1.51 billion, much higher than the P282.33 million seen last Monday.
“The weakness of the Philippine peso (now trading at its lowest levels in more than 10 years) is also to blame as foreigners are seen to dispose more Philippine assets due to the local currency’s decline to avoid forex losses,” Mr. Koa said in a separate message.
The peso weakened to a fresh 12-year low of P53.23 versus the dollar on Wednesday.
Meanwhile, Wall Street ended mixed overnight, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average flat with a loss of 1.58 points or 0.01% to 25,320.73. The S&P 500 index went up 0.17% or 4.85 points to 2,786.85, while the Nasdaq Composite index added 0.57% or 43.87 points to 7,703.79.
Most Asian markets also logged lower finishes on Wednesday, as investors prepared for the results of a series of meetings of the United States Federal Reserve. MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares excluding Japan dropped 0.50%.
Back home, all sectoral indices bled Wednesday, June 13, with holding firms leading the decline with a drop of 3.27% or 253.91 points to 7,506.32. Mining and oil shed 1.65% or 171.13 points to 10,150.38, followed by property which fell 1.52% or 57.47 points to 3,711.64.
Industrials went down 1.41% or 153.94 points to 10,755.96; financials slumped 1.04% or 20.07 points to 1,903.66; and services dipped 0.78% or 11.81 points to 1,494.97.
Some 814.89 million issues switched hands, resulting in a value turnover of P7.17 billion. This marks a recovery from the P4-billion turnover seen last Monday, before the market took a break for the Independence Day holiday.
Decliners prevailed for the day at 127 issues versus 66 names that advanced and the 47 that remained flat.

Report to US Congress flags China as threat

By Camille A. Aguinaldo
A TOP United States military official has raised concerns over China’s ongoing militarization in the South China Sea, saying China may challenge US presence in the region once it deploys its forces in its bases in the disputed waters.
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, Malacañang maintained it will not file a protest against the People’s Republic of China over its alleged destruction of coral reefs on Scarborough Shoal, also locally named Bajo de Masinloc, saying this will only “reverse” the Philippines’ “diplomatic gains.”
‘DEPLOYED FORCES’
In a report to the US Congress by the Congressional Research Service made public on Tuesday, US Navy Admiral Philip S. Davidson was also quoted as saying that Chinese forces may “easily overwhelm the military forces of any South China Sea-claimants.”
“Today, these forward operating bases (in South China Sea) appear complete. The only thing lacking are the deployed forces. Once occupied, China will be able to extend its influence thousands of miles to the south and project power deep into Oceania,” he said at a hearing by the US Senate Armed Services Committee last April.
He added: “The PLA (People’s Liberation Army) will be able to use these bases to challenge U.S. presence in the region, and any forces of any other South China Sea-claimants. In short, China is now capable of controlling the South China Sea in all scenarios short of war with the United States….”
Mr. Davidson was recently installed commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command which oversees US military operations in Asia.
The report is titled “Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress,” which was dated May 24 and made public on Tuesday, June 12.
The report also acknowledged that “Chinese domination” in the South China Sea may affect “US strategic, political, and economic interests in the Asia-Pacific region.”
Aside from the territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the report also raised China’s dispute with the United States over whether the former has a right under international law to regulate activities of foreign military forces operating within China’s exclusive economic zone.
“The dispute appears to be at the heart of incidents between Chinese and U.S. ships and aircraft in international waters and airspace in 2001, 2002, 2009, 2013, and 2014,” it stated.
‘CHINESE DOMINATION’
“In particular, Chinese domination over or control of its near-seas area could greatly complicate the ability of the United States to intervene militarily in a crisis or conflict between China and Taiwan. It could also complicate the ability of the United States to fulfill its obligations under its defense treaties with Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines,” the report said.
Security agreements between the Philippines and the US include the Mutual Defense Treaty and the Visiting Forces Agreement.
“Developments such as these could in turn encourage countries in the region to reexamine their own defense programs and foreign policies, potentially leading to a further change in the region’s security structure,” the report added.
It cited observers’ views that China could be using the disputes to raise doubts among US allies in the region about the dependability of the US as a partner or to weaken US relations with Asian countries. This may result in greater Chinese influence over the region.
The report also described China’s approach to assert its claims in the South China Sea as “salami-slicing strategy in order to “gradually change the status quo in China’s favor.”
The strategy, the report stated, employs “a series of incremental actions, none of which by itself is a casus belli,” or an event or action that justifies a declaration of war.
The report also cited a Chinese official using the term “cabbage strategy” to assert control in the South China Sea “by wrapping those islands, like leaves of a cabbage, in successive layers of occupation and protection” by using Chinese ships.
The US report asserted that the country should not take any position on competing claims to sovereignty over disputed land features in South China Sea.
But it also maintained that territorial disputes should be “resolved peacefully, without coercion, intimidation, threats, or the use of force, and in a manner consistent with international law.”
‘DIPLOMATIC GAINS’
Presidential Spokesperson Harry L. Roque, Jr. in a statement on Wednesday afternoon said: “Filing a new case against China will reverse our diplomatic gains, not to mention the cost it entails. We can therefore discuss the issue of destroyed coral reefs in Scarborough Shoal as this forms part of the area of maritime environmental protection instead of filing a new case.”
“We are a witness to how our friendly consultation and negotiation with China yielded positive results. At present, we have an existing bilateral consultation mechanism (BCM) with China, which has resulted in productive exchange of views on how to boost cooperation on areas which include maritime environmental protection,” he added.
The foreign affairs ministries of both China and the Philippines established the BCM in January 2017 as a platform for confidence-building measures and for promoting maritime cooperation and maritime security between the two states. The BCM meets alternately in the Philippines and China once every six months, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA).
The Philippine government, Mr. Roque also said, has had “continuous discussions on environmental issues” with China. “Both countries are committed to protecting and preserving the environment and to deal strictly with those who do not abide by relevant regulations,” he said.
On Tuesday, Acting Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio urged the government to file a protest against China. “The arbitral tribunal already ruled on 12 July 2016 that China violated its obligations to protect and preserve the marine environment when China did not prevent Chinese fishermen from harvesting giant clams and destroying the coral reefs in the process,” he said in a statement.
Mr. Carpio said the Philippines “was not awarded damages because it did not ask for damages.”
“This time the Philippines should demand damages for the economic losses of Filipino fishermen. We can also ask damages for the action of China in preventing our fishermen from fishing inside the lagoon of Scarborough Shoal in violation of the (12) July 2016 arbitral ruling,” he explained.
As for the alleged harassment by Chinese coast guard personnel who took the catch of Filipino fishermen in the Scarborough Shoal, Mr. Roque also said last Monday that there is no need for the Philippines to file another diplomatic protest. He said it is “enough to convey” the concern to China. — with a report by Arjay L. Balinbin

ICC withdrawal challenged anew in SC

By Dane Angelo M. Enerio
THE SUPREME COURT received on Wednesday a second petition questioning the constitutionality of President Rodrigo R. Duterte’s decision to withdraw the Philippines’ membership from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), this time by the non-government organization that helped lobby for the treaty’s ratification in the country.
In their 49-page petition, the Philippine Coalition for the International Criminal Court (PCICC) said, “the President gravely abused his discretion in an act tantamount to an absence or a lack or jurisdiction, when he unilaterally decided to withdraw the membership of the Philippines from the International Criminal Court, as his act violated the Constitutional system of checks and balances in treaty making under Art VII, Sec. 21 of the 1987 Charter, which prescribes a shared duty towards that end between the Executive and the Legislative branches of the government.”
Mr. Duterte, through Philippine Ambassador to the United Nations (UN) Teodoro L. Locsin, Jr., submitted before the international body its notice of withdrawal on March 16 in response to the ICC’s preliminary examination on Mr. Duterte’s alleged crimes against humanity committed under his administration’s drug war.
According to the PCICC, the withdrawal was done without the dismissal of Senate Resolution No. 546, which formally granted the accession of the Philippines to the Rome Statute on Aug. 23, 2011.
“No act of the Executive may invalidate this legislative act. It may only be recalled, cancelled, or voided by the Senate itself (unless this Honorable Court, on a petition to void it, declares it unconstitutional and illegal),” the petition read.
“[B]ecause Respondents intentionally failed to perform their constitutional duty to submit the question of withdrawal from the ICC to the Senate, Petitioners and the public were deprived of their right to take part in the public deliberations on the same hearing that would have taken place had the Upper House been engaged for the purpose,” it read further.
The PCICC added: “The President gravely abused his discretion in an act tantamount to an absence or lack of jurisdiction, when he unilaterally decided to withdraw the membership of the Philippines from the International Criminal Court, as his act is based on capricious, whimsical, ridiculous, misleading or misled, incoherent, and/or patently false grounds, with no basis in fact, law or jurisprudence.”
Responding to Mr. Duterte’s claim that the treaty was void because it was never published in the Official Gazette or any newspaper with a wide circulation, the PCICC said, “under the constitutional Doctrine of Transformations, there is no requirement of publication under Art. VII, Sec. 21 of the 1987 Charter for the Rome Statute to become effective and binding on the Philippines.”
According to the PCICC, “this is well established in Philippine constitutional adjudication.”
“Thus, clearly, it is specious to argue against the ICC by claiming for lack of publication in Philippine jurisdiction,” the group said, adding:
“This is a legal anomaly brought about by the Respondent’s unilateral act. And such unilateral act has grave legal consequences. It will mean citizens, including Petitioners, will not have a ready recourse to any effective mechanism that used to be there when the Philippines was still a party to the Rome Statute, for redress against cases of impunity should their own government become unable or unwilling to prosecute such cases of impunity.”
BusinessWorld reported on the filing of the first petition last May 16 by opposition Senators Francis N. Pangilinan, Franklin M. Drilon, Paolo Benigno A. Aquino IV, Leila M. De Lima, Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel, and Antonio F. Trillanes IV. The petition claimed Mr. Duterte’s withdrawal was unconstitutional as it did not pass through Congress.
Both petitions have Mr. Locsin, Foreign Secretary Alan Peter S. Cayetano, and Executive Secretary Salvador C. Medialdea as respondents, with Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador S. Panelo being present only in the first petition.
Presidential spokesperson Harry L. Roque, Jr., responding also on Wednesday, said, “We reiterate that the President is the chief architect of the country’s foreign policy. The Constitution makes no mention that concurrence of the Senate is necessary to validate the Philippines’ withdrawal from the International Criminal Court.”“Again, this is not an issue that can be addressed by a certiorari. Hence, the courts must defer matters on foreign affairs to the Executive,” he also said.

Graft charges recommended vs former vice-president, 36 others

By Charmaine A. Tadalan
A SPECIAL fact-finding team of the Office of the Ombudsman has recommended charging former vice-president Jejomar C. Binay and 36 others with graft over the sale of the Boy Scout of the Philippines-owned property in Malugay Street, Makati City.
The Field Identification Office (FIO) reported it has completed the investigation over the “grossly undervalued” sale of the 10,000-square meter property to Alphaland Makati Place, Inc. (AMPI).
The FIO found the property was sold by the BSP National Executive Board in June 2011 for P600 million, a “grossly undervalued (sale) considering that under the Omnibus Loan and Security Agreement between BSP and AMPI, the Malugay property was mortgaged for P1,750,000,000.00 which is indicative of the property’s true value,” the Ombudsman said in a statement.
Further, Intech Property Appraisal, Inc. (Intech), commissioned in November 2015 by the AMPI to appraise the property, later reported the BSP property was valued at P1.7 billion, while its improvements were P8.43 billion. The appraised value of the Malugay property totaled P10.13 billion.
The FIO also found officials of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) responsible for the loss of P63 million in tax collections for exempting the Malugay property sale from the capital gains tax.
“The grant of tax exemption from capital gains tax without obtaining a request for BIR ruling for the exemption was made with manifest partiality and evident bad faith causing undue injury to the government,” the Ombudsman said.
Mr. Binay’s spokesperson Joey S.J. Salgado, for his part, called the findings “selective justice.”
“Clearly, the Ombudsman intends to spend her last days in office pursuing her personal and political agenda against former VP Binay while being a true-blue Yellow protector to the end. It’s selective justice, pure and simple,” Mr. Salgado said in a statement.
Aside from Mr. Binay, the FIO also recommended filing criminal and administrative charges against Senior Vice President Wendel E. Avisado, BSP executives Del R. De Guzman, J. Miguel C. De Jesus, Enrique B. Lagdameo, Pedro B. Destura, Dale B. Corvera, Maximo J. Edralin, Jr., Remedios L. Petilla, Roberto M. Pagdanganan, Harmes S. Sembrano, Mildred L. Garay, Manuel Jose M. Dalipe, Leo G. Lasacar, Danilo C. Asiaten, Lutgardo B. Barbo, Jose Mari G. Pelaez, Ireneo C. Aquino, Jose Eduardo C. Delgado, Henry C. Dy, Jose Ma. C. Gastardo, Pepito M. Carpio, Nemesio Miranda, Jr., Jaime P. Semana, Wilfredo M. Chato, Alan Zulueta, Jorge Banal, Sr., Efren Edgard R. Dieta, Rodolfo B. Tamani, Von Carlo Yacob, J. Rizal C. Pangilinan, Salud A. Bagalso, and Amado Espino, Jr. for violation of sections 3(e) and (g) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.
Also recommended to be charged are AMPI President Mario A. Oreta and former Bureau of Internal Revenue officers Teodoro G. Galicia, Authorized Revenue Official; Mark Anthony Panganiban, Revenue Officer; and Romeo Tomas, Group Supervisor.
The administrative charge of Gross Neglect of Duty, meanwhile, was recommended to be filed against Messrs. Binay, Avisado, De Guzman, Pagdanganan, Lasacar, Pelaez, Delgado, Dy and Carpio.

PBEd flags need to strengthen link between education and job readiness

By Gillian M. Cortez
EDUCATION advocacy group Philippine Business for Education (PBEd) flagged the need for improved quality of learning to empower Filipinos joining the work force.
In a press gathering on Wednesday, PBEd Executive Director Lovelaine B. Basillote said Filipinos’ standing in global competitiveness is still in the “pwede na (not bad)” level.
“In the human capital development, we’re only better than 62% of the countries surveyed. In terms of talent competitiveness, only better than 43% and country competitiveness, only 21%. We’re kind of like in the ‘pwede na’ rank,” she said.
PBEd cited survey reports by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2017, Institut Europeen d’Administration des Affaires (INSEAD) in 2018, and International Institute of Management Development (IMD)in 2018.
The group also cited a study by the Philippine Statistics Office that, “For every five unemployed Filipinos, three have a high school diploma and one, a college degree.”
Ms. Basillote, for her part, citing a World Bank study, said, “Many of our graduates are not ready for work.”
A presentation by the group showed graduates lacking socioemotional skills such as communication and critical thinking, which led to a proportion of two of three employers having difficulty in hiring based on those skills, and an increase of 30% in unfilled vacancies in Philippine firms due to that skills gap.
“This actually shows that the biggest issue is still basic education,” PBEd President Chito B. Salazar said, adding that these skills are meant to be mastered not only during the university level but even earlier than that.
“Most of these are supposed to be developed at the basic education level,” he added.
“We have yet to translate the country’s successes into actual learning–the kind that prepares our people for global economy and the challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” PBEd chair Ramon R. del Rosario Jr. for his part said.
The PBEd also emphasized the need for quality teacher training. “At the end of the day we don’t want to prepare bad teachers for the classroom,” Ms. Basillote said.
The organization also tackled how the government can improve the passing rate of those who take the Licensure Exams for Teachers (LET).
“We’ve continued to call the PRC (Professional Regulation Commission)to make changes in the LET,” Mr. Salazar said. He added the group hopes the agency would “release the questions (of the LET), like the Bar exams (which are) always immediately released after the Bar” so future LET takers could review them.
The group also praised the Department of Education’s recently adapting the Philippine Professional Standard for Teachers, on which institutions should “base teacher hiring, promotion and firing,” said Ms. Basillote.
These standards, as per DepEd Order No. 42, series 2017, aim to produce better educators, in the wake of the shift to K-12, to be in line with international standards.

Nationwide Round-Up

JBC set to interview Supreme Court associate justice candidates


THE JUDICIAL and Bar Council (JBC) is set to interview on Thursday six candidates for the position of Supreme Court (SC) Associate Justice to replace Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr., who will compulsorily retire on Aug. 8, according to the court’s Public Information Office (PIO). Lined up for interview in the morning are Judge Carlos I. Espero II, and Court of Appeals (CA) Associate Justices Oscar V. Badelles and Manuel M. Barrios. In the afternoon, it would be the turn of Ramon D.R. Garcia, CA Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier, and former Ateneo Law School dean Cesar L. Villanueva. The interviews will be live-streamed on YouTube from the official page of the high court. The SCPIO said “the public may submit to the JBC a sworn complaint, report, or opposition against any of the aforesaid applicants.” — Dane Angelo M. Enerio

Hontiveros calls for Senate probe on murders of priests


SENATOR RISA N. Hontiveros-Baraquel, in a Senate resolution filed on Wednesday, called for an investigation into the spate of killings of Catholic priests following the murder of Nueva Ecija priest Father Richmond V. Nilo last Sunday. Fr. Nilo was the third priest to be shot to death after Marcelito Paez in December and Mark Ventura in April. “These killings and attempted killing come on the heels of continued verbal attacks of President Rodrigo Duterte on the Catholic Church and its religious leaders particularly in light of the Catholic Church’s strong critique of the present administration’s War on Drugs policy… Given this current political climate, these killings further reinforce the culture of impunity to silence valid Church-led criticisms on state policies,” Ms. Baraquel said in her resolution. — Camille A. Aguinaldo

Trillanes claims another Chinese plane previously stopped in Davao

SENATOR ANTONIO F. Trillanes IV is claiming that a Chinese plane landed at the Davao International Airport two weeks before another aircraft was reported stopping by at the same airport. “This is not the first time that Chinese planes landed there. There is a previous landing in Davao two weeks ago,” he told reporters on Wednesday, saying that he got the information from sources inside the military. He also said the Chinese aircraft may have unloaded “precious cargo” that he has yet to find out. He also questioned Malacañang’s explanation that the plane stopped by the airport to refuel. “That’s a long-range cargo plane. So even it’s from point-to-point, that does not need refueling. Its capability is transpacific,” he said. — Camille A. Aguinaldo

Duterte: Rice self-sufficiency goal may not be attainable

By Arjay L. Balinbin, Reporter
President Rodrigo R. Duterte on Wednesday, June 13, said he does not believe the country can attain its goal of self-sufficiency in rice production, noting that most lands in Mindanao, which is known to be the country’s food basket, have been “eaten up by cash crops.”
“With the advent of the coming of the cash crops instead of the food crops, kinukulang na tayo ngayon ng lupa (we are losing farm lands),” the President said in his speech at the Palace on Wednesday afternoon after witnessing the signing of a memorandum of agreement (MoA) between the Commission on Higher Education (CHEd) and state and local universities and colleges for the implementation of the Free Higher Education Law.
He added: “Do we have the resources to answer for the food of the Filipino? Kasi sa (It is because in) Mindanao, the choice lands there were eaten up by the cash crop guys. Iyong (The) food crops, wala na masyado (nothing much). And if you’d ask me, in the next how many years, we will just have to import rice. I do not believe that we can be rice-sufficient.”
He likewise said he does not believe in Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel F. Piñol’s statement that the country’s rice-self-sufficiency target may be achieved by “year-end.”
Yung sinabi ni Piñol na at the year-end. Istorya man lang ‘yon,” he said. ([Mr.] Piñol said that by year-end…That was just a bluff.)
In a BusinessWorld‘s report in August last year, Mr. Piñol was quoted as saying, “If we are able to achieve that, the country will have enough rice supply to fill the needs of the Filipino people and we will no longer be dependent on imported rice as early as 2019 or 2020 at the latest.”
“To achieve rice self-sufficiency, the agency will have to meet full-year production of some 21.67 million metric tons of unhusked rice, or palay,” the report also said.
Also in his speech, the President recalled “the last ruckus” in the National Food Authority (NFA).
“I had to cut some powers of Cabinet members for just being too shortsighted or jumping into others’ territory. I said, ‘Why can’t you make the buffer stock of rice reach the ceiling? Our buffer stock was only good for three to four days. You must be crazy’,” he said.
Last April, Mr. Duterte had ordered to return the supervision of the NFA back to the DA. Following the re-oganization, Mr. Piñol took over as chairman of the NFA council, which was formerly headed by Cabinet Secretary Leoncio B. Evasco, Jr.

20 men bound to be undocumented workers stopped at NAIA

Bureau of Immigration (BI) logoUNABLE TO present proper documentation, 20 men bound for Sao Tome and Principe were stopped on June 8 by Bureau of Immigration (BI) officers at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA). “Tinanong kami if gusto naming magtrabaho sa project sa Sao Tome, pumayag kami kasi malaki ang sweldo, (We were asked if we wanted to work at their project in Sao Tome. We agreed because we were offered good pay),” one of the suspected human trafficking victims is quoted in a statement released by the BI Wednesday, June 13. BI Spokesperson Dana Krizia Sandoval said the men were offered construction jobs in the small African island nation. The case has been referred to the Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking for investigation, she added.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT