Home Blog Page 11280

Kai Sotto in Gilas line up?

THERE’S a strong possibility that Kai Sotto might crack the line-up of Gilas Pilipinas playing in the next window of FIBA Asia World Cup Qualifier on Nov. 30 and if so, he’ll be the only high school player who could play alongside the men’s team in the elite competition.
Gilas Pilipinas head coach Yeng Guiao had already included the 7-foot-1 Sotto in the pool, which means he could be suiting up for the national men’s basketball team in the next window game against Kazakhstan and against Iran on Dec. 3.
Guiao decided to include Sotto, whom he believes should be accelerated as the high school competition in the country is definitely no match for him. Sotto’s dominance in his age group level, the under-16, caught the attention of many teams in the United States and Europe and the second generation cager received feelers.
Kai’s dad, Ervin, confirmed that his son could be tapped to play next month. Ervin works as one of the assistant coaches of Guiao at NLEX in the PBA as well as the Bataan Risers in the MPBL.
“There’s a big possibility he would play. Coach Yeng already included him in the pool, but Kai is not required to practice with the team since he’s still studying in Ateneo,” added the elder Sotto.
The Philippine men’s basketball team will resume training on the first Monday of November.
Kai had attended several workouts of the men’s national team as well as Guiao’s PBA squad, and the exposure he could receive with Gilas Pilipinas would boost his stock more in the international market. Sotto is one of the top players in the young men’s level as proven by his stint with the Batang Gilas team that went on to qualify in the FIBA World Cup Under-17 division.
But can Sotto make some contribution once he joins the big dogs?
It wouldn’t be surprising if the young Sotto becomes even better as soon as he plays alongside the best players in the country and Guiao, who has the penchant of bringing the best out of his players and noted for developing young talents, could make the young, promising center the next big thing in Philippine basketball. — Rey Joble

Philippines versus Spain

In the Batumi Olympiad our women’s team had a great victory over Spain, the 15th seed, in round 6. As can be seen from the table below we were out rated on every board and yet came away with a 3.0-1.0 victory.

bd01 IM Sabrina Vega Gutierrez 2404 vs WGM Janelle Mae Frayna 2287; 1/2

bd02 FM Marta Garcia Martin 2329 vs WFM Shania Mae Mendoza 2113; 0-1

bd03 IM Ana Matnadze 2362 vs WIM Marie Antoinette San Diego 2102; 1/2

bd04 WGM Monica Calzetta Ruiz 2235 vs WIM Bernadette Galas 2080; 0-1

Our margin of victory could have been much bigger, as top board WGM Janelle Mae Frayna, the first and so far only Woman Grandmaster from the Philippines, had a winning game but nerves got in the way. Janelle told her story:

Vega Guiterrez, Sabrina (2404) — Frayna, Janelle Mae (2287) [C00]
Women’s Chess Olympiad 2018, 28.09.2018 [WGM JM Frayna]

1.e4 e6
I was convinced by coach GM (grandmaster) Jayson to return to my old weapon, the French Defense. Recently, I mostly play 1..g6 and try to stir the game into Modern or Pirc territories.
2.Qe2
Usually my opponent plays the Tarrasch Defense 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2. When I studied her games I came to a conclusion that she has particular inclination to positional chess. Since this is the Olympiad, I always expect my opponents to try and play something they don’t usually do so as to frustrate my opening preparation — this game was no exception.
2…e5!?
My preparation ended here! I just know that Q on e2 isn’t that appealing for 1.e4 e5 lines. Now I just have to trust my instincts.
3.Nf3 Nc6 4.c3!? Nf6
White was obviously planning to push her pawn to d4 and I was not sure how to continue. Here are more or less my thought processes:
4…Bc5 is no good, white can now make good use of her extra Q tempo with 5.Nxe5! typical idea 5…Nxe5 6.d4 Bd6 7.dxe5 Bxe5 8.f4 Bf6 9.Be3 and white has smooth development;
4…d5 I thought for about 25 minutes on this move. I wanted to play ala Ponziani Opening with the added move of Qe2 but I saw that this wouldn’t work in my favor 5.exd5?! (5.Qb5?! During the game I felt so annoyed by this possibility 5…dxe4 but 6.Nxe5 Qd6 and Black is at least fine 7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.Qe2 Nf6 since in exchange of the broken pawn structure, white danced too much with the royal mistress) 5…Qxd5 6.d4 Bg4 7.dxe5 0–0–0 8.Nbd2 if she plays this line, I believe I would be better but taking the pawn isn’t forced at all;
I finally decided against playing 4…d5 because of 5.d4! and I think I am losing a pawn thanks to White’s seemingly misplaced queen!
5.d4 d6 6.d5 Nb8!? 7.c4
Ok. 7. c4 is a normal center grabbing move. But guess what, I’m totally happy she played it. Since I know I could transpose the line to a King’s Indian Defence (KID). IM Sabrina Vega has more than 1,450 games in my database and I noticed that she only plays 1.d4 if she believes that her opponent will reply with 1…d5. In other words she does not like playing against Indian Defenses. So I got this feeling that psychologically, I have won the opening battle already. Maybe it’s too subjective but that’s how I convince myself!
7…g6 8.Nc3 Bg7 9.h3 0–0 10.Be3 Nh5
The King’s Indian Makogonov System goes 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 0–0 5.Nf3 d6 6.h3 e5 7.d5. That is basically the position we have on the board except that White’s queen is on e2.
11.g3 Na6?!
An “automatic” move. It seems to me now that 11…a5 is better in anticipation for a probable queenside castling 12.Bg2 Na6 13.0–0–0 (13.0–0 Bd7 then a4) 13…Qe8! this is far better than the normal developing move 13…Bd7 as I think playing f7–f5 is still a priority even in opposite side castlings. Black should be okay here.
12.Bg2 f5?! 13.exf5 gxf5 14.Ng5! Nf6?!
Played after about 25 minutes. I thought 14…Qe8 was a mistake because of 15.Ne6 Bxe6 16.dxe6 f4 17.gxf4 exf4 18.Bd2 Nc5 19.e7 then I stopped in this line thinking white is simply better but 19…Rf5 saves the day 20.0–0–0 Re5 21.Qf3 c6 with equal chances.
15.0–0–0
[15.g4!? is possible here, this blasting idea is also typical in KID structures]
15…Qe7 16.Ne6 Bxe6 17.dxe6 c6
I don’t think I have a choice here.
18.g4! f4 19.Bd2 Nc5
Improving my worst piece. I felt like I was walking a tightrope but at least I’m hanging well! Now, I have my counter chances. 19…Qxe6 20.Bxf4 Nxg4 21.hxg4 Rxf4 it seemed to me that Black’s position is dangerous.
20.g5 Ne8 21.h4 Nc7
I wanted to put my knight in d4 to create counter possibilities. Both of us are now down to about 10 minutes.
22.h5?!
[22.Ne4 is essential to create some nuisance and counterattacks on the king 22…N7xe6 but during the game I think white may have her chances if I defend poorly]
22…N7xe6 23.h6? <D>
POSITION AFTER 23.H6
Played on instinct, I guess?
23…f3!
Now I am winning.
24.Bxf3 Nd4 25.Bd5+!?
[25.Qf1 Rxf3 is too tame and I think could convert my advantage with 26.hxg7 Nd3+ 27.Kb1 Nxf2 Black is clearly winning]
25…cxd5 26.Qh5
I was surprised that Bh8 was simply winning for me. I was just so worried of the possible opening of the g-file, and some ghost mating ideas. This clearly shows my lack of courage and faith on my calculations. With this game, I have committed too many safe moves that eventually made me miss the win.
26…Nd3+?!
Not the best but it still should be enough for me to win the game. 26…Bh8 27.g6 Rf5! keeping my cool and finding counter attacking moves 28.Nxd5 (28.Qh3 hxg6 29.h7+ Kf7 30.Nxd5 Qe6 White has just given up too much material) 28…Qe6 29.gxh7+ Kxh7 I am simply winning.
27.Kb1 Nxf2 28.g6
This isn’t the best move for a losing position, that’s according to the engine. But for human, I think this is the best effort to make things more scary for me. 28.hxg7 Qxg7 29.Nxd5 Nxh1 30.Nf6+ Rxf6 31.gxf6 Ng3! intermediate move. I have to work more on my tactics and of course get my nerves under control!
28…hxg6?!
Played immediately. 28…Bf6! is a clear win. After 29.Rdg1 (29.Nxd5 Qe6 threatening Nh1 or liquidation with Qf5) 29…Nxh1 White has no good follow-up.
29.Qxg6 Nxh1?
I played two consecutive quick moves. I have about 3 minutes in my clock so I rushed on taking the rook on h1 but this is stupid since I have another choice of capture! 29…Nxd1 and I think it’s over with a pawn and exchange up. This could be an easy endgame win for me 30.Rxd1 Qf7 an irresistible trade as I have access on the crucial f5 square.
30.Rxh1
When she played this move, I broke out in cold sweat because I already saw what’s coming and I realized that what I played was a mistake. I had only expected 30.Rg1 Qf7 of course, parrying the threat (30…Rf7 31.Nxd5 Qe6) 31.Qxg7+ Qxg7 32.Rxg7+ Kh8.
30…Qf7?! 31.Qxg7+ Qxg7 32.hxg7 Kxg7?!
I considered 32…Rfd8 for a long time. Then I thought after 33.Bg5 Rdc8 34.Nxd5 Kxg7 would leave my king exposed and she could somehow force some tricks. What a dummy! I hate it whenever I play too cautiously.
33.Bh6+ Kg6 34.Bxf8 Rxf8 35.Nxd5
With just seconds on my clock, I was so confused on what transpired on the board. From decisive advantage to a slightly better position but I still thought that even with one pawn I could still nail the win. But the files were wide open and I know she’s got some annoying checks on her sleeves.
35…Re8?!
The final dubious move. 35…Rf3 36.Rg1+ Kf7 37.Rh1 b5 38.cxb5 Nxb5 39.a4 Ke6! another in-between move! Black is clearly better.
36.Rg1+ Kf7 37.Rf1+ Kg7
Alas! The king cannot escape! 37…Ke6?? 38.Nc7+
38.Rg1+ Kf7 39.Rf1+ Kg7 40.Rg1+ Kf7 ½–½
I had multiple chances to win but let them slip through my fingers. I understand that for me to win games, I have to be firm with my calculations, work on my nerves and practice a champion’s attitude of being bold and fearless.
This was a thrilling day for the team as we defeated the 15th seed Spain (3–1). It’s just a pity that we had not sustain our good start in the first half of the tournament with 4.5/6. We slumped down to 67th as a result of our poor output of winning just one out of the five remaining rounds. As the first board player, I felt responsible for our team’s final standing. I felt we could have done better, but life goes on. It only means that we still lack of training and the heart to win crucial games. I will be better, we will be better. Hoping to play for our flag again in the 2020 Chess Olympiad but not only just to play but to dominate our category group or even reach the top 10.
 
Bobby Ang is a founding member of the National Chess Federation of the Philippines (NCFP) and its first Executive Director. A Certified Public Accountant (CPA), he taught accounting in the University of Santo Tomas for 25 years and is currently Chief Audit Executive of the Equicom Group of Companies.
bobby@cpamd.net

Cavs fire Lue

Yesterday’s firing of Tyronn Lue was no surprise to longtime followers of the National Basketball Association in general, and of the Cavaliers (Cavs) in particular. The contention that players win games and coaches lose them may be cliched, but it’s also essentially true. Which was why he met the news of the change in his employment status with Zen-like calm and acceptance. He was without a victory in six games to start the 2018-19 season, and blame necessarily fell on his shoulders.
No doubt, the decision to move on from Lue wasn’t easy for the Cavaliers. After all, he helped steer them to their first-ever championship since they joined the league in 1970 — and, exponentially adding to the historic significance, as vast underdogs who had to mount a hitherto-unheard-of comeback from a one-and-three deficit in the Finals. He was the rare players’ mentor who didn’t just emerge from the ranks and knew whereof he spoke; he possessed the title cachet to engender respect from marquee names in his fold.
Indeed, it takes a unique blend of talent, communication skills, empathy, and leadership to shepherd today’s superstars and the constantly changing rosters around them. And, as the biggest by far of the current generation, LeBron James is especially difficult to deal with. Yet, Lue managed to rewrite record books with him, and to the point where he continually acknowledged their productive relationship. “Thanks for the memories, and, more importantly, our partnership [in] bringing a title to that deserved city/fan base,” he tweeted yesterday after its subject was shown the door.
Cavaliers general manager Koby Altman is right. There will be other opportunities for Lue, just not the one that requires a playoff berth while in support of a youth movement. Meanwhile, he will be remembered for a great many things, not least of all the successful run for the Larry O’Brien Trophy that culminated in him shedding happy tears alone on the bench as the buzzer sounded in Game Seven of the 2016 Finals. And, if nothing else, his experience captured the thankless job he had. In the highest of highs and the lowest of lows, the joy is in the work itself.
 
Anthony L. Cuaycong has been writing Courtside since BusinessWorld introduced a Sports section in 1994.

UnionBank posts lower net income in first nine months

By Anna Gabriela A. Mogato
Union Bank of the Philippines, Inc. (UnionBank) recorded a lower net income in the first nine months of 2018, dipping to P6.1 billion from P6.4 billion in the same period last year, despite sustained double-digit growth in customer business.
In a disclosure to the stock market on Monday, UnionBank Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Jose Emmanuel U. Hilado said that their margins were affected by the increase in interest rates and lack of new loan releases to teachers.
“We expect margins to improve as assets reprice and now that CitySavings’ access to DepEd’s automatic payroll deduction system has been resolved,” he added. CitySavings is the thrift bank subsidiary of UnionBank
“We remain confident in sustaining our robust earning asset growth which shall be supported by our successful Php10 billion rights offering,” he added.
Overall loans grew 18.6% year-on-year to P315.3 billion, boosting Unionbank’s total assets by 17% year-on-year to P643 billion. The Aboitiz-owned bank’s assets are mainly supported by deposits valued at P441.4 billion.
The company’s net revenues, on the other hand, grew by 3.3% to P18.9 billion from P18.3 billion a year ago.
This third-quarter performance translated to an annualized Return on Equity of 11% and a Return on Average Assets of 1.3%.

The present and future of insurance brokerage

It only makes sense that as an economy grows, the need for insurance also increases. For instance, consider non-life insurance. As the average household income grows, the more high-value possessions they will own. The more they have to protect, the more likely people will turn to insurance brokers to try to protect them.

The same thing can be seen in the Philippines. In terms of growth, the insurance brokerage in the country is showing remarkable growth. According to the Insurance Commission, for 2017, premium income generated by brokerage activities rose on the back of mediated profit in the non-life segment. From P52.07 billion in 2016, the tally recorded for 2017 grew to P57.92 billion as reported by 63 insurance brokerage firms, 11.23% higher.

Brokerage activities accounted for 20.56% or P57.08 billion of the P227.58 billion total premium generated by life and non-life firms.

Broken down, more than four-fifths or 83.54% of the mediated premium generated last year came from the non-life insurance industry, totaling P48.38 billion. The mediated premium from life insurance, meanwhile, amounted to P8.7 billion, representing 15.02% of the total.

The Insurance Commission also reported that the industry posted a total of P7.32 billion in terms of brokerage revenue or commissions earned as of end-2017, 12.1% higher than the P6.53 billion a year ago. Most of such commissions came from the non-life segment, totalling P6.17 billion and representing 84.21% of total earners

Insurance brokerage encompasses insurance brokerage firms, insurance brokers or agents, and brokerage fees. A brokerage fee is paid to a broker or an agent for executing a transaction for a client on behalf of an insurer or an insurance brokerage firm.

The positive results in the local insurance brokerage industry bodes well with the projections for the rest of the world. According to London-based market research firm Technavio, the global market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.69% from 2018 to 2022.

However, perhaps more so than other industries, insurance brokerage would need to adapt to a changing landscape brought by innovations and emerging digital technologies. The digital economy poses a significant threat to the industry, encroaching on the responsibilities of brokers and disintermediating them. To remain relevant, there is a pressing need to adapt to, and embrace, digital transformation.

Fintech, for instance, is changing how people interact with insurance brokers. As customers seek out faster, more personalized services through technological means, the broker’s role is being displaced. For even experienced brokers, it simply would not be feasible to compete with the more accurate, more convenient services fintech can offer.

Global professional services firm Accenture, which provides a range of solutions in strategy, consulting, digital, technology, and insurance, believes that brokers all over the world are facing rising customer expectations; the growing disintermediation as carriers and insurance newcomers woo purchasers; changing risk mitigation requirements; increasing competition from rivals using sophisticated data analytics; and a surge in alliances between insurers and smart tech firms that could shut them out of new business. Digital improvements and automation are also saving customers money in the form of lower intermediary commissions and fees.

“Brokers must be looking for ways to combat this decrease through innovation and service changes,” Accenture wrote in its blog.

“We also estimate that brokers’ revenues from mid-sized and large customers could shrink by up to 20%, driven by two complementary factors. On the one hand, increasing automation and improved risk prediction by customers are likely to reduce their need for insurance. And on the other, automation of the risk placement process in the more commoditized sectors of the market is likely to increase transparency and drive down prices, with commissions and fees following in tandem.”

Equipped with such technology, new entrants and start-ups are competing with brokers in their core business, poaching large accounts and small-to-medium enterprises by offering attractive and customized direct-to-customer services, like analytics-driven aggregation.

In Accenture’s report, ‘The broker of the future: Winning in a disruptive environment’, 84% of surveyed insurance executives agree that traditional organizations must hurry to become the first mover, evolving their business before they’re disrupted. Brokers taking the lead in digital transformation are reaping significant rewards.

Part of this transformation, the firm said, should look into platform business models.

“Insurance executives expect platform business models to become a big part of their growth strategies. As brokers look for ways to provide more value to customers, platforms are becoming more vital by increasing efficiencies, risk prevention and scalability,” Accenture wrote.

“Insurance brokering will not become obsolete. Customers will continue to seek out brokers’ independent advice. But, if brokers want to remain competitive in a time of stagnating growth, they must respond and adapt to increasing trends caused by digital disruption.” — Bjorn Biel M. Beltran

Insurance broking basics

Finding the right insurance cover can be confusing and time-consuming due to the increasing number of insurers, policies, offers and options to choose from. But with the help of insurance brokers, this struggle can be avoided.

As specialists of insurance protection, insurance brokers have an in-depth working knowledge of the insurance market. They have access to a variety of insurance products and have the ability to deal with a range of insurance companies directly.

By applying their knowledge and expertise in the field, insurance brokers can help clients identify the types of risks and exposures they face, and determine what needs insuring and what can be managed in other ways.

According to InsuranceHotline.com, a public company based in Canada that offers free online insurance rate comparison service, having an insurance broker means that you have a professional on your side who will help you choose the best policy.

“They offer professional and unbiased advice, ethical conduct, and full disclosure of all the information you need to make an informed decision,” InsuranceHotline.com said in its Web site.

The firm also noted that insurance brokers are experienced and skilled professionals in dealing with the claims process from many different insurance companies.

“They can talk you through each stage while giving you personalized advice and excellent customer service. Brokers will help protect your privacy and advocate to the insurance companies on your behalf,” InsuranceHotline.com said.

Moreover, brokers are committed to lifelong learning. Insurance brokers ensure that they are informed on the latest changes and adjustments to insurance policies and legislation to give their clients the best options available when purchasing any insurance policy.

There are two types of brokers that specialize in different covers and policies: retail and commercial.

Professional brokers who act on behalf of companies and individuals are called retail insurance brokers. They offer policies such as health, travel, home, and auto insurance, along with private and public liability and employer’s liability plans.

On the other hand, commercial insurance brokers specialize in industries such as gas, oil, marine, and aviation, and offer complex and high-value policies.

Aside from helping clients make a well-informed decision and finding the best deal, insurance brokers can help in many ways. Here are a few worth noting:

Using an insurance broker saves time and money. With their established relationship with many insurance carriers, insurance brokers can easily compare rates based on the personal information of the client in a very short period of time. There is also an assurance that you will get the most appropriate level of cover for the price, so you won’t end up with cheap insurance that doesn’t adequately protect you. In addition, some brokers have access to exclusive deals or aspects of cover that insurance companies might not give to you if you approach them directly.

Having an insurance broker gives you peace of mind. Since brokers are not tied to a specific company or a specific company’s products, you have the assurance that you will get the right insurance coverage that meets your needs. Insurance brokers can educate you about existing insurance that you may not know but perfectly suit your requirements. 

Insurance brokers can make complex things simple. The field of insurance is a jargon-filled industry; it has legal terminologies and acronyms that can be difficult to understand. Brokers can explain things clearly and make the complex simple. They are responsible for ensuring you have a clear understanding of the coverage you are going to avail.

Your privacy is protected. Insurance brokers collect your personal information to determine the best insurance for you, your family, assets or business. This is not a problem since brokers are required by the Code of Ethics to maintain your privacy and keep all client discussions and information completely confidential.

Insurance brokers can guide you through the claims process. They can make the whole experience less stressful, especially if you’re also dealing with other knock-on effects of the incident that brought about the claim.

Insurance brokers work with their clients on a long-term basis. Unlike dealing directly with insurers, having an insurance broker would prevent you from talking to one person to the next. Through the years, insurance brokers will know your history and will understand your every need to find the best policies. — Mark Louis F. Ferrolino

Banks’ bad debts grow further

BAD DEBTS held by big banks kept growing in August but at a slower pace compared to the pickup in total lending, latest central bank data showed.
Universal and commercial banks saw cumulative non-performing loans (NPLs) reach P112.936 billion that month, inching up from July’s P112.297 billion and rising 8.4% from P104.213 billion in August 2017.
NPLs refer to loans left unpaid at least 30 days past due date. These are considered risky assets given a slim chance that borrowers would pay their outstanding balances, in turn spelling losses for lenders.
The increase in bad loans is slightly faster than the eight percent logged in July but slower than the 9.5% climb in June, according to latest available data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP).
Still, NPLs grew slower than the 17.9% increase in loans by the big lenders, with the total rising to P8.406 trillion from P7.131 trillion in August last year.
As a result, the share of soured debts to total loans dropped to 1.34% from 1.46% a year ago, which is a more manageable level for the lenders.
Past due loans, referring to loans that missed the payment deadline, grew by a faster 29.8% to P159.744 billion in August.
On the other hand, restructured debts — loans given a longer repayment period — slipped by a tenth to P31.729 billion, data showed.
Mounting problem loans prompted lenders to raise provisions they set for possible credit losses. Reserves went up 13.1% year-on-year to P161.301 billion, enough to cover nearly 1.5 times the total stash of bad debts.
Non-performing assets held by big lenders steadied from last year at P69.896 billion.
This represents the value of real property and other items seized from clients who failed to pay their obligations.
Strong loan growth came alongside a steadily increasing deposit base. Total deposits held by big banks went up by 9.7% to P11.144 trillion in August from P10.158 trillion a year ago. These funded bank loans, with outstanding credit equivalent to 75.43% of the deposit base.
The BSP monitors NPL ratios of banks and financial firms in order to check asset quality and maintain the soundness of the financial system.
Bad loans amounted to P177.388 billion across the entire Philippine banking system, up 11.4% from a year ago.
Their share to total debts declined to 1.88% from 1.97% previously, sustaining a trend observed over the past few years. — Melissa Luz T. Lopez

Employers’ group presses for pay increases based on productivity

EMPLOYERS again pressed for a shift to “productivity-based” daily minimum wage raise during a public hearing on proposals to hike the floor pay of Metro Manila’s private sector workers on Friday last week.
That hearing — conducted after separate consultations with labor groups on Monday and with representatives of employers on Wednesday — did not yield any agreement on a wage hike and Ana C. Dione, chairperson of the National Capital Region’s Regional Tripartite Wage and Productivity Board, told reporters after Friday’s hearing that she expected the board to encounter difficulty in arriving at an agreement on an increase in daily minimum wage given wide differences in positions among its members.
The board is scheduled to meet tomorrow.
“It’s about time for the board to innovate by conducting a productivity-based minimum wage policy,” said Employers Confederation of the Philippines Governor Antonio H. Abad, Jr. during the hearing on Friday, explaining that this type of adjustment would be more reasonable than a fixed increase because it would take into consideration the financial capacity of individual businesses.
He noted that the Cavite-Laguna-Batangas-Rizal-Quezon region that has a large concentration of industrial zones already implements a two-tiered wage system consisting of a daily minimum wage and performance incentive.
The implementing rules of that region’s 2017 wage order provide that “labor and management… are encouraged to adopt productivity improvement schemes such as time-and-motion studies, good housekeeping, quality circles, labor and management cooperation and implement gain-sharing and other performance incentive schemes in order to improve the quality of life of workers and, in turn, enable them to perform better and contribute to enterprise growth.”
“We must give way to holistic approaches rather than stop-gap measures such as periodic wage adjustment,” Mr. Abad said on Friday.
In the same meeting, the Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP) reiterated the need to add up to P334 to Metro Manila’s daily minimum wage of P475-512, while the Association of Minimum Wage Earners and Advocates has asked for an even bigger P688 increase.
Latest available Philippine Statistics Authority data show labor productivity — computed as gross domestic product per employed person — growing 8.4% last year, the biggest improvement in at least eight years.
For TUCP Assistant General Secretary Vicente C. Camillon, Jr., however, minimum wage earners have not been adequately rewarded for improved productivity. “Nagi-increase — productivity pero zero po ang increase sa real wages (Productivity may be increasing, but there is zero increase in wages adjusted to inflation),” he said in last Friday’s hearing. — Gillian M. Cortez

IMF ups Argentina financing deal to $56.3 billion

WASHINGTON/BUENOS AIRES — The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Friday increased the size of a standby financing agreement for Argentina to $56.3 billion in a deal that toughens previously agreed fiscal measures.
Argentina’s President Mauricio Macri agreed to a $50-billion IMF deal in June, hoping it would stop a run on the country’s peso currency. But the peso kept falling, forcing him to renegotiate the agreement.
The new deal will require the government to make deeper spending cuts and increase taxes to bring the South American nation’s primary fiscal deficit, projected at 2.7% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018, to zero next year. Mr. Macri is preparing to run for a second term in late 2019.
Argentina’s economy, which has been racked by high inflation, slid into recession after a drought in early 2018 sapped grain exports.
In a letter to the IMF, Argentina said it expected inflation to peak at more than 40% in January then fall quickly in 2019.
The letter also said Argentina expects an economic contraction of 2-3% of GDP in 2018. The government had previously expected a 2.4% contraction this year.
“We expect the recession to continue for the rest of 2018 and into the first quarter of 2019, with a recovery to begin in the second quarter of next year,” an IMF official said.
IMF Director Christine Lagarde said a 2019 federal budget proposal approved by Argentina’s lower house of congress would help the government meet its targets. “Its passage into law will be key to restoring confidence,” she said in a statement.
Foreign exchange and global macro strategist for Standard Chartered bank Ilya Gofshteyn said Argentina’s September trade surplus was key in raising hopes over an economic rebound in 2019. “Argentine policy makers have reason to feel a bit more optimistic about the adjustment process after the trade balance posted a surplus for the first time in close to two years,” Ms. Gofshteyn said.
Cutting the deficit during a presidential election year is almost unheard of in Argentina. Wide swaths of the population have come to rely on welfare programs and subsidies that helped the country recover from a 2002 economic crisis that tossed millions of middle-class Argentines into poverty.
Mr. Macri’s popularity has fallen as he has cut pension benefits and public utility subsidies. Riot police fired rubber bullets at anti-austerity protesters in front of Congress on Wednesday last week as lower house lawmakers debated and then approved the government’s 2019 budget bill, which codifies fiscal targets agreed with the IMF.
The peso sell-off started in April, driven by doubts about the central bank’s ability to roll over its burgeoning stock of short-term debt. The run on the currency was sparked by jittery foreign investors who dumped Argentine paper in favor of safe-haven US dollar assets. The Argentine economy has since slipped into recession, with inflation at more than 40%.
Argentina’s peso, which remained steady following the announcement of the deal, has strengthened this month, but remains about 50% weaker than where it started the year. — Reuters

ACR in talks with Mindanao cooperatives

ALSONS Consolidated Resources, Inc. (ACR) is in talks with electric cooperatives in Mindanao in its bid to forge a power supply agreement early next year for the output of its 15.1 megawatt (MW) run-of-river hydroelectric power plant in Sarangani province.
“We want to get it done in Q1 (first quarter) of 2019. We’re looking for a single off-taker for that capacity,” said Antonio Miguel B. Alcantara, ACR corporate planning officer, in an interview after the listing of the company’s commercial papers last week.
He said the discussions were mainly with cooperatives in Mindanao, which he said are preparing for regulations that require them to source power from renewable energy resources.
“There’s green [energy] option that’s coming, renewable portfolio standards, so coops are mandated to secure a percentage from renewable energy,” he said.
The Siguil hydropower plant is a P4.25 billion project at the Siguil River basin in Maasin, Sarangani that is expected to start commercial operations in 2021. It is planned to provide power to Sarangani, General Santos City and municipalities of South Cotabato.
Mr. Alcantara, who oversees the company’s renewable energy projects, said ACR would next work on the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) agreement for its next project — another run-of-river hydro facility — in Negros Occidental. He said the company targets to award the EPC contract by the end of 2019.
“We hope to proceed with NTP (notice to proceed) by end of 2019 or beginning of 2020. [There’s a] lot of work needed,” he said.
The projects are ACR’s initial venture in renewable energy for which it has lined up more run-of-river projects in Negros Occidental, Sarangani, Davao Oriental, Zamboanga del Norte, the two Agusan provinces, and Surigao del Sur. The projects have a potential hydro capacity of more than 145 MW.
On Friday, ACR listed an initial P100 million of the company’s P2.5 billion commercial papers with the Philippine Dealing and Exchange Corp. to provide interim funding for the Siguil project.
Asked whether the company was joining the race to the unsubscribed portion of the feed-in tariff (FiT) for run-of-river hydro projects, Mr. Alcantara said: “FiT is an option for us but then the problem, we don’t want to put up a project based on FiT because you can only get the allocation if you [are], I believe, 80% completed. So the risk of someone else getting that allocation is there.”
He said the 80% completion for Siguil would take place only in 2020.
Under the previous administration, the Energy department set an installation target of 250 MW for run-of-river hydro projects, but the scheme ended with a few projects completing their facilities.
The large unsubscribed portion prompted the department to extend the scheme until end-2019. The FiT system aims to encourage the development of renewable energy in the country by paying first-mover developers a fixed amount for the power they produce for 20 years. — Victor V. Saulon

Spain’s Acciona eyes PHL renewable energy projects

By Victor V. Saulon
Sub-editor
SPANISH FIRM Acciona, S.A. plans to expand its operations in the Philippines and beef up its manpower as it explores opportunities in the renewable energy sector in partnership with a local company, its regional official said.
“What we’re trying to do is to understand the possibilities on the energy side, the green energy side of the country,” said Jorge F. Gayoso Mediero, Acciona head of business development for Southeast Asia and Iran, during an “appreciation” event with its local partners last week.
“We know that there is no feed-in tariff right now in the Philippines, but we’re trying to move forward with different deals,” he told reporters, referring to the government scheme that grants a fixed tariff for 20 years to early investors in renewable energy.
The Acciona official said the company was looking at the potential of signing power purchase agreements with private companies, specifically big industrial consumers, in place of the feed-in tariff. Acciona’s expertise is in designing specific solutions in wind and solar energy.
“We need partners because of regulation,” he said, citing the 40% limitation in the stake of a foreign firm embarking on a local renewable energy project.
“We have conversations with local partners,” he added, but declining to identify the prospective partners because of a confidentiality agreement.
Mr. Mediero said Acciona is open to developing any green technology project, although he said the most competitive at this time are those using wind and solar energy technologies.
“The only problem of the renewable energy is that sometimes we have no wind, or we have no sun. During the night for example we have no protection. So we have to put in the middle of the process a local retailer, a utility, someone that operates in the electricity market,” he said.
Acciona last year won the contract to build the new Cebu-Cordova bridge in the Visayas, marking the company’s second deal in the country.
The contract is worth $400 million, and will be carried out as the Cebu Link Joint Venture in partnership with First Balfour, Inc. and D.M. Consunji, Inc. The customer is the Cebu Cordova Link Expressway Corp., which is owned by Metro Pacific Tollways Corp.
Acciona’s first project in the country was awarded in 2016 for the design and construction of the Putatan 2 drinking water plant, which the company will also operate for its first year in service. The €90-million contract was awarded by Maynilad Water Services, Inc. to a joint venture comprising Acciona and local partners.
Mr. Mediero said Acciona decided to expand into renewable energy in the Philippines “because the price of energy is high, which means that we have a chance to compete and offer better prices with renewable energy.”
He said the company has 20 years of experience in renewable energy, which started in Spain in the mid-90s through wind and solar energy projects. Acciona has installed 10,000 megawatts worldwide, mostly in wind, solar, hydro and biomass projects.
He said the company has a big team of engineers, financial and legal experts that could optimize the design of energy projects, including their construction and operation. This would allow the company to offer competitive electricity prices, he added.
“We have an office here,” he said, referring to a lone staff in the energy business. “We are in the business development stage but very soon we’re going to have more people here because we have pretty good opportunities to grow in the Philippines.”

PHL, Japan to sign ODA deal for MRT rehabilitation in Nov.

THE Department of Transportation (DoTr) on Sunday said it is ready to sign an agreement with the Japanese government for the use of official development assistance (ODA) to fund the rehabilitation of the Metro Rail Transit Line 3 (MRT-3) following the initial roll out of new trains.
In a statement, the DoTr said it deployed on Saturday the first of 48 light rail vehicles (LRVs) procured from Chinese company CRRC Dalian Co. in 2014. It noted the other LRVs are still undergoing assessment and validation before being deployed.
After adding the new trains, next for the MRT-3 is the entry of a new maintenance provider and the P22.061-billion loan from Japan for its rehabilitation.
Ang problema natin sa MRT-3 ay hindi lang ang kakulangan ng tren, na takdang tugunan ng dagdag na Dalian Trains. May problema rin sa lumang mga tren, sa riles, sa lumang signaling, at sa kung ano ano pa [The problem with the MRT-3 isn’t only about the lack of trains, which will be resolved by the Dalian trains. There is also a problem on old trains, rails, old signaling system, among others],” DoTr Undersecretary for Railways Timothy John R. Batan said in the statement.
The DoTr said the Exchange of Notes and Loan Agreement between the Philippines and Japan is scheduled for signing in early November, before the meeting of the Philippines-Japan High Level Joint Committee on Infrastructure and Economic Development in Manila.
The deal between the Philippines and new MRT-3 maintenance provider Sumitomo Corp. and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Sumitomo-MHI) is also targeted to be signed after the exchange of notes and loan agreement.
The DoTr said engineers from Sumitomo-MHI have started advance transition works on the MRT last Oct. 15.
Earlier this month, Transportation Secretary Arthur P. Tugade told reporters issues on the Dalian trains were causing delay in the entry of Sumitomo-MHI as maintenance provider for the MRT-3.
Third party auditor TÜV Rheinland said it found issues on weight, signaling, and compatibility of maintenance equipment with the Dalian trains, hence the delay in its deployment. Manufacturer CRRC Dalian then agreed to make the necessary adjustments free of charge. — Denise A. Valdez