Facebook Instagram Linkedin Twitter Youtube
Home Blog Page 9970

Why should there be election debates?

To many people, ‘election debates,’ is a means to inform voters of how the issues of the day are framed and discussed by candidates. The exchange of ideas that happens between opposing candidates is supposed to reveal information that voters need especially in knowing and evaluating candidates — what they stand for, what their plans are, among Pothers. Equipped with this knowledge, voters are said to be more capable of making informed decision of who to vote for or not.
Broadcast debates, are assumed to amplify this function by allowing people to hear or see the actual discussions between candidates on various pressing issues. For more than four decades, the use of communication technologies, in particular, television, in election debates, has been an effective means of disseminating information. With more and more people who are tuned in their television and radio, election debates have become one of the sought-after moments in a campaign period.
What is an election debate? What is its purpose? Why should we care about it?
Election debate, first and foremost, is commonly understood as one of the campaign events that allows candidates (and even parties) to engage their rivals, on various controversial issues that may likely affect their policy proposals, legislative agenda, platforms, among others. It essentially comes from the old practice in Ancient Greece where people profusely talk about opposing views on a particular topic in their city-states. Later on, Roman Senators, medieval scholars, and modern politicians appropriated this practice to shape and determine the legislative agenda, political frameworks, among others.
Debates usually entail three things: the systematic way of arriving at a claim or logic, art of public speaking or oratory, and the creative use of words or rhetoric. In election debates, appearance or the projected image of a person adds new dimension to the debate by giving emphasis to image, gestures and body language vis-à-vis the claims in the debate.
Its purpose is two-fold: first, it gives the candidates the opportunity to have a stage to introduce themselves to the public, to know their opponents, vilify a fiercest rival, etc.; second, it allows voters to examine the candidates or parties by observing how they behave, their platform, programs, etc. Election debate is major part of the campaign where candidates and parties are forced to learn also about their opponents. Voters, on the other hand, are given a chance to have a closer look at the candidates and their parties apart from the typical campaign ads, jingles, posters, etc.
The advent of new communication technologies, such as radios, television, brought a new dimension in the election debate because of the entry of media as the “moderator” of this political event. Since the time of the first televised election debate (between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960), the media has become the constant “gatekeeper” of issues, framings, discourses, interpretations, among others, of an election debate. This phenomenon has created a new reality called “mediated politics.” Mediated politics happens when the perception and understanding of the people are heavily influenced by the media (broadcast or printed).
Most of the scholars today (from Political Communication such as William Benoit, Stephen Coleman, etc. and Political Science like Alan Abramowitz, Andre Blais, etc.) agree that the effects of mediated politics in an electoral practice such as election debates are mixed, complex and multifaceted. The information that come from these broadcasted election debates, according to them, do not automatically lead to an informed voting (other factors include confidence, disposition, etc.).
The view that election debates are a neutral ground where real exchange of ideas really takes places is erroneous and misplaced. First of all, they are performative displays that can be predetermined and rehearsed. The debaters will definitely say what they think the people would want to hear from them. Media people can also make use of this event as a way to favor their preferred candidate or vilify their unwanted candidate.
Second, this is a candidate-centered event that tends to limit the discussion to issues, framings, interpretations that are alien to most people. The discussion between the candidates and the media actor, far from educating the people, tends to impose their views or understanding to the people.
Third, as a campaign event, campaigners tend to reduce this as a mere electoral fanfare where candidates are forced to simply comply to this imperative. In this situation, debaters or even media actors are not prepared for the debate or completely not aware of the things to be debated upon.
Voters should really care about election debates because there is something wrong with how we practice this age-old tradition in politics. Election debates, just like any debate, always need an audience for feedback or participation from the people — to applaud or approve/ to reject or rebuke a claim. It should become a dialogue between the voters, candidates and the media where we can also inform the candidates and media about our issues and sentiments.
 
Arjan P. Aguirre is an Instructor at the Department of Political Science, School of Social Sciences of the Ateneo de Manila University. He handles courses on Politics and Governance, History of Political Theory, Contemporary Political Theories, Electoral Reforms in the Philippines, and, Social Movements and Civil Society. He also works as Consultant for Legal Network for Truthful Elections (LENTE) and Simbahang Lingkod ng Bayan (SLB).
aaguirre@ateneo.edu

Gauging the SEC CG Codes against the ‘CG’ Provisions of the Corporation Code

1. Hierarchical placement of the SEC’s CG Codes vis-à-vis the Corporation Code and Securities Regulation Code

It would be helpful to discuss briefly the hierarchical value of the SEC Corporate Governance (CG) Codes in relation to the provisions of the Corporation Code (CC) and the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) that actually have within their frameworks systems of CG.
The Original CG Code, the Revised CG Code, and the CG Code for PLCs were promulgated by the SEC in the exercise of its rule-making power, otherwise known in Administrative Law, as its quasi-legislative power, and constitute therefore what is termed “subsidiary legislation.” Section 143 of the CC defines the rule-making power of the SEC, thus:

… The SEC shall have the power and authority to implement the provisions of this Code, and to promulgate rules and regulations reasonably necessary to enable it to perform its duties hereunder, particularly in the prevention of fraud and abuses on the part of the controlling stockholders, members, directors, trustees or officers.

Section 72.1 of the SRC provides for a more expanded authority for the SEC, thus:

… This Code shall be self-executory. To effect the provisions and purposes of this Code, the Commission may issue, amend, and rescind such rules and regulations and orders necessary or appropriate. … For purposes of its rules or regulations, the Commission may classify persons, securities, and other matters, within its jurisdiction, prescribe different requirements for different classes of persons, securities, or matters, and by rule or order, conditionally or unconditionally exempt any person, security, or transaction, or class or classes of persons, securities or transactions, from any or all provisions of this Code.

Failure on the part of the Commission to issue rules and regulations shall not in any manner affect the self-executory nature of this Code.

There is controversy of how much leeway and power can be exercised by the SEC on the basis of the language of Section 72.1 as not to offend well-established principles in Constitutional Law of non-delegation of legislative powers. For example, the power of the SEC under Section 72.1 “by rule or order, conditionally or unconditionally exempt any person, security, or transactions … from any or all provisions of this Code,” is tantamount to granting SEC the discretion to override the prohibitory or mandatory rules of the SRC, which essentially amounts to power to “unmake” the law.
The prevailing theory in our jurisdiction is that the exercise of the quasi-legislative power of any administrative agency like the SEC cannot amount to “law-making” (or unmaking for that matter), but can only cover “law-execution;” that administrative regulations are intended only to implement the law and to carry out the legislative policy, but that “[t]he discretion to determine what the law shall be is exclusively legislative and cannot be delegated.”
No matter what language may be used in statutory provisions defining SEC’s rule-making power, there can be no doubt that SEC has no power to violate constitutional precepts, particularly those found in the Bill of Rights. For example, the Bill of Rights provides for due process and prohibits undue classification: “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied equal protection of the law.”
Therefore, although Section 72.1 of the SRC empowers the SEC to “classify persons, securities, and other matters,” for purpose of determining application or non-application of the provisions of the SRC, such provision cannot be used to unreasonably discriminate against a person or class of persons under the principle “that no person or class of persons shall be deprived of the same protection of the laws which is enjoyed by other persons or other classes in the same place and in like circumstances.”
In evaluating therefore the various provisions of the SEC CG Codes that seek to expand the powers of the Boards of Directors over their composition, the manner of election, the providing for additional qualifications and disqualifications, as well as the setting-up of competitive remunerations rates for directors, we shall be guided by the principle that such exercise of SEC’s quasi-legislative power would be illegal and void when they violate or are contrary to the terms of, or the policy behind, the specific statutory provisions, or they extend the coverage thereof beyond the original intention provided under the statutory provisions sought to be implemented.

2. Approaches of the SEC CG Codes in empowering the Boards of Directors of Publicly-Held Companies

a. Original and Revised CG Codes: Mandatory and Rules-Based in Character

When the SEC initiated in 2002 the CG reforms within the entire PHC Sector, the CG principles and best practices contained in the original CG Code were mandatory in character, and yet the only penalty clause referred to the non-submission of the manual of CG, thus:

VIII. Commitment to CG

Corporation shall promulgate and adopt its CG rules and principles in accordance with this Code. Said rules shall be in manual form and available as reference by the directors. It shall be submitted to the Commission, which shall evaluate the same and their compliance with this Code taking into account the size and nature of business. The said manual shall be available for inspection by any stockholder of the corporation at reasonable hours on business days.

IX. Administrative Sanction

Failure to adopt a manual of CG as specified therein shall subject a corporation, after due notice and hearing, to a penalty of P100,000.00.

The enforcement approach of the Original CG Code was to compel publicly-held companies to formally adopt a manual of CG for their particular corporate situation that would become part of the charter and thereby legally enforceable by the SEC and their stakeholders. The adoption and formal registration with the SEC of a manual for CG ensured that every PHC Board and Management reviewed the provisions thereof on the basis of their corporate setting and the unique demands of the industry in which they operate, and thereupon adopt a manual of CG that translates the CG principles and leading practices thereof to their particular corporate situation. The results would be that on the corporate front, each publicly-held company would then begin to “own” the terms of the governance principles and practice which it has on its own adopt under the terms of the manual. The manual itself, being submitted formally with the SEC, serves as a contractual commitment on the part of each publicly-held company, its Board of Directors and Management, to which it can be made accountable, and the failure to comply with its terms and conditions would always be construed against the company itself, for it is the very proponent of the terms thereof.
It was rather curious therefore that in 2009 when the Revised CG Code replaced the Original CG Code, it provided for a penalty clause for non-compliance or violations of the provisions thereof, thus:

Article 11: Administrative Sanctions

A fine of not more than Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000) shall, after due notice and hearing, be imposed for every year that a covered corporation violates the provisions of this Code, without prejudice to other sanctions that the Commission may be authorized to impose under the law; provided, however, that any violation of the Securities Regulation Code punishable by a specific penalty shall be assessed separately and shall not be covered by the abovementioned fine.

Fines and other penalties imposed by the SEC are serious matters, not only because of the pecuniary burdens placed on the company, but more importantly, under the CC, and in the Revised SEC Code itself, a violation may constitute as a ground for the disqualification of a director, or constitute as “proper cause,” for his removal by the requisite vote of stockholders.
Although there is no doubt that the failure to comply with the requirement of filing the manual is punishable under Article 11 of the Revised CG Code, it seems difficult to see how any other “violation” thereof may be properly punished by a fine of P200,000 “for every year that a covered corporation violates the provisions of this Code.”
Firstly, instead of the fine being imposed on every violation of the provisions of the Revised CG Code, the penalty that is imposable is limited to “P200,000 every year.” This would come to the dubious end that a covered corporation may commit various infractions under the Code, and only be liable to a maximum penalty of “P200,000 per year.”
Secondly, CG principles and best practices are primarily to be followed or practiced by the directors and key officers of a covered corporation, and the infraction would be a personal liability on their part. Yet the provisions of Article 11 of the Revised CG Code apply the penalty only to a violation by the “covered corporation,” and not the director or officer guilty of an offense under the Code.
Thirdly, although the non-filing of the manual on CG constitutes a situation that “a covered corporation violates the provisions of this Code,” simply because the original provisions of the original SEC Code specifically covered only such violation, it is not clear what other violations may be punishable under Article 11 of the Revised CG Code.
The then SEC Secretary, Atty. Gerard M. Lukban, was quoted as saying that “The previous code had provisions that use ‘may’. … Here some were changed to ‘shall’ so they are no longer just recommendatory.” That would mean that every provision that imposes an obligation with the use of the word “shall” would be a violation of the Revised CG Code that would be punishable with the fine under Article 11 thereof.
For example, under Art. 2(F), it is provided that “The Board should formulate the corporation’s vision, mission, strategic objectives, policies and procedures that shall guide its activities, including the means to effectively monitor Management’s performance.” Obviously, compliance with such duty may find its expression in the manual of CG submitted with the SEC. But if the manual duly submitted does not contain one or some of the items enumerated, or what are submitted are not effective or complete, does that constitute a violation of the Revised CG Code, triggering the imposition, after notice and hearing, of the P200,000 fine? Who is to judge what is “effective”?
Another example would Article 6(B) of the Revised CG Code which reads —

B) The Board should be transparent and fair in the conduct of the annual and special stockholders’ meetings of the corporation. The stockholders should be encouraged to personally attend such meetings. If they cannot attend, they should be apprised ahead of time of their right to appoint a proxy. Subject to the requirements of the bylaws, the exercise of that right shall not be unduly restricted and any doubt about the validity of a proxy should be resolved in the stockholder’s favor.

In a situation where there are issues in the implementation of by-law provisions on proxy, and the Board, upon advice of counsel, takes a position which is deemed restricted of the right of a stockholder, would that trigger the imposition of the penalty under Article 11 of the Code? Would the fine be imposable against the covered corporation or against the members of the Board? Who is to say what is “unduly restrictive”?
If we were to presume that the clear intention under Article 11 of the Revised CG Code is that the penalty imposed would be personally against the offending director or officer, it would have a chilling effect on the exercise of business judgment on the part of the Board of Directors, and would even discourage qualified professional directors to accept appointment to publicly-held companies simply because they are not certain exactly what action or inaction would constitute punishable offense under said provision.
In any event, what is important to consider is that the net effect of the changes introduced by the Revised CG Code was to make the provisions thereof mandatory to publicly-held companies, and non-compliance therewith may involve the imposition of administrative and penal sanctions. Such penalty provisions are often necessary to get any system going, but effective only when they are evenly enforced. However, the use of coercive measures in fact misses the whole point of what CG reform movement is all about — it is meant to show to businessmen that doing good is consistent with doing well in business. As they say, piety obtained out of fear is mere pretense.
The second important feature of both the Original and Revised CG Codes is that they both presented with the same format: they start each section by stating the CG principle in a certain area of concern, and then provide under each principle a set of duties and responsibilities or best practices that would enforce the principle highlighted. In short, both SEC CG Codes are “rules-based” codes, as contrasted from “principles-based” approach in CG reforms.
The main objection against rules-based codes, especially those that carry sanctions, is that they do not promote a “change of hearts and minds,” in the sense that they merely impel directors and officers to right away refer the matters to their legal counsel, and the organization ends up with “ticking the boxes,” to ensure compliance with the required or indicated measures of the code.
In addition, since a rules-based code cannot possibly anticipate all situations that may occur in the corporate setting, then pursuit of CG reforms ends up with the Board and Management looking for loopholes, or of pursuit a set of actions that are not clearly within the mandatory coverage of the rules or measures indicated in the code.
Finally, CG codes that are the product of the exercise by the supervising agency of its quasi-legislative powers tend to be challenged by covered companies as being unlawful when the area covered is clearly not within the powers of the agency to promulgate or tend to conflict with existing statutory provisions on the matter.
The article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or the MAP.
 
Cesar L. Villanueva is Chair of the MAP Corporate Governance Committee, the Founding Partner of the Villanueva Gabionza & Dy Law Offices, and the former Chair of the Governance Commission for GOCCs (GCG).
cvillanueva@vgslaw.com
map@map.org.ph
http://map.org.ph

UAAP: Rondina, Laure lead volleyball scoring

By Michael Angelo S. Murillo
Senior Reporter
THE first round of the eliminations of Season 81 University Athletic Association of the Philippines women’s volleyball came to an end on Sunday with the University of Santo Tomas Golden Tigresses figuring prominently in key statistics, particularly in the scoring department.
Led by the explosive duo of veteran player Sisi Rondina and top-class rookie Eya Laure, UST, currently at joint second place with a 5-2 record, is getting it done offensively which has considerably helped its cause in the ongoing season of the UAAP.
Rondina is the top scorer in the league after the first seven games, averaging 17.4 points per match while coming in second is Laure with 16.7 points.
The two are also the best spikers, with the rookie at number one with a 37.88% success percentage in her spikes while the graduating Rondina is at second at 34.26%.
Their efforts have made the Tigresses the best spiking team in UAAP Season 81 with a success percentage of 31.38%.
Interestingly, UST had another steady double-digit scorer in Filipino-Italian Milena Alessandrini before she saw her year cut with a season-ending knee injury just four games into the tournament. At the time of her injury, Alessandrini, last year’s rookie of the year, was averaging 13 points a game.
Laure said key to their success to date is just enjoying the game as a team and trusting the ability of one another.
“We’re just playing with a lot of heart and enjoying the game. We hope to continue doing that in the second round,” said Laure following their straight-sets win over the University of the East Lady Warriors on Sunday.
Meanwhile, third in individual scoring for the season is University of the Philippines wing spiker Tots Carlos at 15.7 points followed by Kat Tolentino (15.3 points) of the league-leading Ateneo Lady Eagles at number four.
Rounding out the top five is rookie Princess Robles of the National University Lady Bulldogs with 14.4 points.
At sixth place is Isa Molde of UP with 14.3 points, followed by Judith Abil (14.1) of UE, Ivy Lacsina (13.7) of NU, Lycha Ebon (13.7) of the Far Eastern University Lady Tamaraws, and Cel Domingo (12.9) also of FEU.
In blocking, it is Ateneo’s Maddie Madayag who is tops, followed by FEU’s Domingo, Ateneo’s Tolentino, Rosielyn Doria of NU and Seth Rodriguez of UE.
Robles is best in serves, punctuated by a league-best 18 aces, with Kyle Negrito of FEU at second followed by Michelle Cobb and Aduke Ogunsanya of the De La Salle Lady Spikers, and Doria of NU.
Best in digs is Adamson Lady Falcons libero Tonnie Rose Ponce with a 7.2 average per set, followed by Ria Duremdes (6.9) of FEU, Kath Arado (6.4) of UE, Jennifer Nierva (5.2) of NU and Carmel June Saga (4.3) of La Salle.
In setting it is Cobb of La Salle who leads with a 6.3 average per set with Ayel Estranero of UP second with a 6.2 average, followed by Laizah Bendong (6.2) of UE, Deanna Wong of Ateneo (5.3) and Negrito (5.1) of FEU.
UE’s Arado leads in receives with a 59% efficiency rate, followed by Nierva (51.4%) of NU, Adamson’s Ponce (47.3%), FEU’s Duremdes (46.8%) and La Salle’s Des Cheng (41%).

McIlroy wins Players Championship by one stroke in Florida

PONTE VEDRA, FLORIDA — Rory McIlroy celebrated St. Patrick’s Day in style by becoming the first player from Northern Ireland to win the Players Championship, emerging as the last man standing to beat Jim Furyk by one stroke in Ponte Vedra, Florida on Sunday.
On a day when 15 players at one stage were within two shots of the lead, McIlroy eventually emerged from the pack, overcoming an early double-bogey by displaying enough maturity to hang tough before moving in for the proverbial kill.
McIlroy carded two-under-par 70 at the famous TPC Sawgrass course in Ponte Vedra Beach to win a championship that was first held in 1974, when it was won by Jack Nicklaus.
McIlroy finished at 16-under 272 to edge American Furyk, who with a gimme birdie at the final hole threatened to become the event’s oldest winner at the age of 48.
“Sawgrass and I didn’t have the greatest relationship starting off,” McIlroy told reporters, referring to missed cuts in his first three appearances from 2009-11.
“It’s a massive win on a course (where) I’ve had mixed results. I had to show a lot of character out there. Any time I looked at the leader board I was pleasantly surprised I hadn’t fallen two or three shots behind.
“That gave me a little bit of encouragement to keep going and play a great back nine. I am just thankful that it was my turn this week.”
With Furyk already in the clubhouse, the 29-year-old McIlroy knew what he had to do as he played the final three holes.
After a birdie at the par-four 15th, he used his power to reach the par-five 16th in two shots and a two-putt birdie gave him the lead.
McIlroy then safely negotiated the water-lined final two holes with tap-in pars to clinch the most prestigious tournament outside the four majors.
Furyk shot 67 to finish alone on 15-under.
FURYK DISAPPOINTED
“There’s a little disappointment, thinking maybe I played well enough to win,” said the American. “Rory obviously felt differently.”
It was Furyk’s 31st runner-up finish on the PGA Tour, the same number as Tiger Woods who has also won 80 times compared to his compatriot’s 17.
Englishman Eddie Pepperell (66) and Venezuelan Jhonattan Vegas (66) finished two strokes behind McIlroy in a tie for third.
Pepperrell and Vegas sank monster birdies at the par-three 17th, Pepperell sinking a rollercoaster 50-footer before Vegas one-upped him with a 70-footer.
Overnight leader Jon Rahm floundered, the Spaniard making three bogeys in the first four holes and compounding his misery by dunking his tee shot into the water at the par-three 17th.
He shot 76 and finished equal 12th on 11-under.
McIlroy’s win came after close calls at all five of his previous starts this year.
He will head to the Masters next month brimming with confidence, needing a victory at Augusta National to complete the grand slam of all four modern majors.
“I’m just really proud of myself the way I played the last few holes,” he said.
“(I was thinking) why not me? This is my tournament and I’ve got to finish it off.
“I kept telling myself on the way to the 17th tee, just make three more good swings, that’s all you need to do and this thing is yours.
“To step up and make those three good swings, it’s very satisfying knowing that it’s in there when it needs to be.” — Reuters

Loman, others did well in introducing themselves to local fans — analyst

WHEN BRAVE Combat Federation held its first-ever event in Manila on Friday, an underlying narrative was introducing Filipino fighters under its wing to be known in their home turf. It was something that was successfully achieved, one local fight analyst said, after the hometown bets performed very well on fight night.
Played under “Brave 22: Storm of Warriors” at the Mall of Asia Arena on March 15, the Filipino fighters competing in the Bahrain-based promotion were able to highlight what they are capable of with quality performances, led by bantamweight champion Stephen “The Sniper” Loman, who retained his title with an impressive fourth-round technical knockout victory in the headlining fight.
Seeing action in the Philippines for the first time with Brave, Mr. Loman (12-2) of Team Lakay of Baguio City did not disappoint the hometown fans as he treated them to an exciting match that culminated in him stopping challenger Elias “Smile” Boudegzdame of Algeria in devastating fashion in the fourth round.
It was a performance that was worth noting, said fight analyst Nissi Icasiano, especially in relation to what Mr. Loman and Brave wanted to accomplish.
“Indeed, it was a showcase to introduce our other Filipino mixed martial artists to the rest of the world, especially when it comes to Team Lakay because the team is built on their big names such as Eduard Folayang, Kevin Belingon and so on. The spotlight was shined upon Mark Sangiao’s new batch of Team Lakay, including Stephen Loman who did not disappoint with his performance against Elias Boudegzdame,” Mr. Icasiano shared with BusinessWorld.
Apart from Mr. Loman, other Team Lakay winners at Storm of Warriors were bantamweights Jeremy Pacatiw and Harold Banario and flyweight Jomar Pa-ac.
Other Filipino winners were featherweight Rolando Dy and Jayson Margallo.
PERFECT GAME PLAN
Asked for his thoughts on the showing of Mr. Loman, the fight analyst said the Filipino had a perfect game plan and gave credit to how he played to his strengths to emerge victorious.
“Stephen Loman had the perfect game plan against Elias Boudegzdame. He avoided rolling with his challenger on the mat as much as possible and dictated the pace of the fight in the stand-up. His key weapons in the fight were the left cross and push kicks to the body, which paid dividends later on in the bout,” said Mr. Icasiano.
“It was the icing on the cake when he got the stoppage with just one second remaining in the fourth round to successfully defend his bantamweight crown,” he added.
Moving forward, Mr. Icasiano said the ceiling for Mr. Loman to soar in Brave is still high and he expects the fighter, with help from his team, to be capable in taking on all comers that would stand in his way.
“Brave is a young company. I believe they are still in the process of filling up every division they have, including the bantamweight division. They have yet to make it a stacked weight class, which is completely understandable. So far, Loman has defeated the likes of Frans Mlambo, Felipe Efrain, and now Elias Boudegzdame. I won’t be surprised if the promotion brings in a new guy from the free agent market who has good credentials to challenge Loman for the title,” Mr. Icasiano said.
Brave said that “Brave 22” was the first of many it plans to stage in the Philippines, seeing the country as a market it has to be in.
In the country, Brave tied up with ESPN5 as its official broadcast partner. — Michael Angelo S. Murillo

Sixers down Bucks to clinch playoff spot

LOS ANGELES — Joel Embiid scored 40 points and grabbed 15 rebounds to lead the visiting Philadelphia 76ers past the Milwaukee Bucks 130-125 on Sunday.
It was Embiid’s 52nd double-double and the 25th time he has scored at least 30 points and swept 10 rebounds in a game. He scored 18 points alone in the fourth quarter.
Jimmy Butler had 27 and JJ Redick 19 for the Sixers, who won their fourth in a row and officially clinched a playoff spot.
Giannis Antetokounmpo was terrific for the Bucks with a career-high 52 points to go along with 16 rebounds and seven assists. Khris Middleton added 19 points.
The Bucks played without guard Malcolm Brogdon, who will be sidelined for at least six weeks with a plantar fascia tear in his right foot.
The Sixers built a 62-53 lead at halftime thanks in large part to Embiid’s double-double of 16 points and 10 rebounds.
Antetokounmpo paced the Bucks with 17 points and seven rebounds. Middleton struggled offensively and missed eight of his 10 shots.
Antetokounmpo drove to the basket, nudged Boban Marjanovic out of the way and threw down a nasty dunk to get the Bucks within 81-74 with 5:04 left in the third quarter.
Antetokounmpo appeared to tweak his ankle with 1:40 remaining in the third but remained in the game to shoot the two free throws as the fans chanted “MVP!”
76ers still led 89-82 after 3 quarters.
Philadelphia came out aggressive in the fourth and extended its advantage to 98-86 with 9:34 left when Mike Scott drained a 3-pointer.
After Antetokounmpo reached the basket, got fouled and made one of two shots, the Bucks trailed 107-99 with 4:49 to go.
Butler responded in a big way with a 3-pointer to put the Sixers back ahead by 11.
Butler knocked down two more shots to stay hot and the Philadelphia lead was 116-103 with 3:02 remaining.
Leading 120-116, Embiid hit a trey from the top of the key for a seven-point lead with 34.9 seconds left.
Embiid made two free throws in the waning seconds to help seal the win. — Reuters

Bacoor Strikers’ center undergoes face, nose surgery

KING Destacamento, the 22-year-old homegrown center of the Bacoor Strikers, successfully underwent surgery on his fractured face and nose he received from a wayward elbow of Denmar Mahaling of the General Santos Warriors.
At around 8 p.m. on Sunday, the promising 6-foot-4 frontliner who became a revelation in the Strikers’ two-game sweep of their southern swing MPBL playoffs series against the Warriors, underwent successful operation.
Team executive Dennis Abella wrote to BusinessWorld that they are considering to provide Destacamento a protective mask if ever the young player decides to return to action.
“Most probably naka-mask siya,” Abella wrote in an online interview.
Abella added that he was told by the doctor that Destacamento’s return depends on the healing process.
“It’s a good thing our next series will be in two weeks time. Hopefully, Destacamento has recovered a bit and be fit enough to play,” added Abella. “But the doctor’s recommendation is really a month’s time.”
Chaye Cabal-Revilla, wife of Bacoor Strikers co-owner Congressman Strike Revilla, was the one who facilitated Destacamento’s hospitalization at Asian Hospital in Alabang.
“We sought second opinion as King complained of headache and difficulty in breathing,” said Ms. Revilla. “He is advised to rest for a month, but the good thing about King is his youth and the doctor said his recovery might be even faster.”
Destacamento was trying out his luck for a spot with the Laguna Heroes and nearly gave up his hopes continuing his basketball career until he was able to crack the line up of Bacoor where he was inserted as a homegrown player.
He had shown his potential the past few games, including the series clinching victory over Gen San where he ended up with 12 points, six rebounds and six blocks before he was taken out of the game after receiving an elbow from Mahaling while the latter was making a short stab.
Mahaling decided to embrace the role of an enforcer when he was seen kicking a fallen Mark Montuano during a loose ball scramble before Roger Malig-on came to the aid of his teammate and used his body as a shield.
Montuano, according to Abella, will also undergo CT scan as the player complained of headache. — Rey Joble

Competing Esports teams bullish of chances at The Nationals


NEXT WEEK the growing Esports scene in the country will be further enhanced with the kickoff of the first season of The Nationals — the Philippines’ first and only franchise-based Esports League.
Initially will feature five competing teams, The Nationals hopes to elevate the standing of the sport in the country that will have people viewing it as something worth investing time and effort in.
Competing in the first year of the league are Bren Epro, Cignal Ultra Warriors, HF Emperors, PLDT-Smart Omega, and Suha-XCTN Punishers. STI is the sixth team but is set to make its debut in the middle of this year.
Games to be featured on the first year of The Nationals, happening from March to October, are Dota 2 on PC, Mobile Legends: Bang Bang on Mobile, and Tekken 7 on PS4.
With less than a week since the league officially fires off on March 24, the competing teams said they are very excited and confident of their chances even as they highlighted the hugeness of The Nationals in growing the Esports scene in the country and further legitimizing it.
“The Nationals is huge for Esports in the country since it is being backed up prominent and respected groups. And the good thing about it all is that it is just the beginning,” said Jobe Nkemakolam, owner of Suha-XCTN Punishers, in an interview with BusinessWorld.
Mr. Nkemakolam, a former player with the Ateneo basketball team, said the field at The Nationals is very competitive but it would not stop them in going all out and make waves.
“All the teams in The Nationals are good. You cannot take anyone for granted. It will be a battle of strategies and all. Nothing is a sure-win I think. I believe we can compete with the rest of them,” he said.
For Bren Epro, the team is looking to its experience as a collective to propel its cause.
“We are very excited with the start of The Nationals. We are very happy that we are part of the endemic group with all the incorporators and partner teams. We have been in Esports for a much longer time than the other teams. And I think we will do good. That’s our expectation,” said Jab Escutin, Bren Epro owner, in a separate interview.
Like, Mr. Nkemakolam of Suha, Mr. Escutin also touts the setting up of a franchise-based Esports League in the Philippines.
“Coming from a company that is for Esports, we are happy that there are a lot of opportunities for the industry to grow in the Philippines, especially in making it legitimate. The Nationals is a good step for us. It’s a step in the right direction. Here we have certain rules and certain processes that we follow. Having those is big for Esports in the country. It’s a step in being recognized,” Mr. Escutin said.
On the part of the Cignal Ultra Warriors, it said it has been training hard in preparation for its campaign in The Nationals.
“We are training very hard. We have been taking care of our players, making sure they have everything they need to be able to perform well in the tournament,” said Cignal Ultra Warriors team owner Jane Basas.
The Cignal Ultra Warriors’ mobile games team is coming off a successful bid in the Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Professional League — Philippines where it bagged the season 2 title.
All the games in the first season of The Nationals will be played at the Gariath Concepts Studio in Eastwood City, Libis, Quezon City.
The Nationals’ official TV broadcast partners are ESPN5 through 5Plus on Free TV and Cignal TV through eGG Network and One Sports on Pay TV. Livestreaming on social media will likewise be provided by the league.
For more information on the league follow it on its Website at TheNationals.PH. It is also on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. — Michael Angelo S. Murillo

Lyceum-Cavite dodges upset in 2019 NBTC Nationals Seeding Round

MAC Guadana and John Barba steered Lyceum-Cavite to a 74-71 squeaker over Holy Trinity College-General Santos to start their campaign on a high note in the 2019 Chooks-to-Go NBTC League National Finals presented by SM Monday morning at SM Mall of Asia Arena.
Guadana fired 24 points, six rebounds, six assists, and three steals, as Barba poured 23 points, none bigger than his go-ahead bucket in the final 10 seconds, on top of seven boards and three assists as they helped the Junior Pirates avert a 22-point meltdown in the Seeding Round.
The win allowed Lyceum-Cavite to lock down the 28-seed, setting up a first round collision with 5-seed Ateneo de Manila High School in the national high school championship sponsored by Chooks-to-Go, Darlington-Exped Socks, EPSON, Huawei, Freego, Purefoods, Gatorade, Go for Gold, SM, Molten, and presented by 5Plus and Lighthouse Events.
Kyle Buen still had a shot to give the Wildcats the lead, but went way short in his floater that led to Jae Omandac sealing the deal at the free throw line.
HTC-GenSan settled for the 29-seed after the loss and will meet 4-seed San Beda.
In the other games, University of Baguio outsteadied Dolores National High School-Eastern Samar, 68-56, to claim the 27-seed; Narvacan National High School-Candon stunned Isabella Colleges-Cauayan, 80-74, to lock down the 25-seed; and Sta. Clarita International School-Iloilo fought back to frustrate Zamboanga del Sur National High School-Pagadian, 99-88, to clinch the 26-seed.The 2019 Chooks-to-Go NBTC League National Finals presented by SM will feature 32 teams composed of league champions, perennial contenders, regional titlists, and a record-six international teams.
The week-long tournament from March 18 to 24 will be free of admission, with fans needing just a valid ID to enter the SM Mall of Asia Arena.
The tournament semis and finals, alongside the annual All-Star Game, will be aired live on ESPN5. All games, from the seeding round to the championship round, will also be streamed live over at tv5.espn.com.

Thiem topples ‘legend’ Federer to claim first Masters 1000 title

INDIAN WELLS — Dominic Thiem claimed his first Masters 1000 title after coming from a set down to defeat Roger Federer 3-6 6-3 7-5 and win the BNP Paribas Open on Sunday in Indian Wells.
Momentum swung in Thiem’s favor in the deciding set when he smacked a forehand winner down the line to break Federer and take a 6-5 lead.
The Austrian fell on his back and covered his face with his hands when Federer, who had been bidding for a record sixth Indian Wells title and 101st tournament victory, netted on match point.
The 25-year-old Thiem, who will rise four places to a career-high world number four on Monday, paid tribute to his opponent.
“It is such a pleasure to compete with you, to learn so much from you, and to play with one of the biggest legends of all time,” he told the 20-times Grand Slam champion during the trophy presentation ceremony.
“I feel like it’s not my right to congratulate you, you have 88 more titles than me, so I’m just hoping you play more and we can have some other big finals,” he said with a laugh.
Federer was gracious in defeat after falling in the final in the Southern California desert for a second consecutive year.
“It has been a great week for me even though it didn’t work out today,” he said.
“What a great week for Dominic. Wonderful playing at the very end and throughout the week. You deserve it.”
Federer raced to an early lead, winning the first three games before wrapping up the first set in the Southern California desert.
But baseline specialist Thiem kept his composure and levelled the match in the second, gaining traction by extending rallies and unleashing a torrent of high-kicking serves to keep Federer off balance.
Federer’s own serve lost some of its bite in the crucial game in the third set with the score tied at 5-5.
“The game he broke me I didn’t serve very well, so I think he took advantage of that fact,” said Federer, who was not overly down about the defeat.
“I just got my 100 (career title) in Dubai and I had a good week here,” the 37-year-old said.
“Really there is no reason to get down. Plus there is more to look forward to in Miami.”
Thiem will also play in Miami, hoping to complete the “Sunshine Double” with a victory there after his Indian Wells win. — Reuters

Teener stuns Kerber to win Indian Wells

INDIAN WELLS — Canadian teenager Bianca Andreescu stunned three-times Grand Slam champion Angelique Kerber 6-4 3-6 6-4 to win the BNP Paribas Open and capture her first career title in Indian Wells on Sunday.
Andreescu used creative and aggressive shot-making to defeat the German despite suffering with a troublesome right shoulder and leg cramps on a hot and sunny day in the Southern California desert.
The 18-year-old dropped her racket and fell on her back when Kerber hit a backhand into the net on match point to deliver the tournament wildcard the victory.
“It wasn’t an easy match. It was one of the toughest matches I’ve ever played,” she said in an on-court interview. “It’s so incredible.” — Reuters

Timely confidence

Considering Rory McIlroy’s recent travails with the lead and only the fourth round between him and a podium finish, it was to his advantage that he began his last day at the Players Championship out of the final pairing. After all, he had hitherto failed to win from such a position in his last nine opportunities. And, for good measure, he began yesterday’s 18 a mere stroke behind frontrunner John Rahm. In other words, he was in a good place mentally, and he just needed to trust his swing in order to live up to expectations.
It’s easier said than done, to be sure — and perhaps especially for Mr. McIlroy, whose singular talent in the eyes of many should have already netted him many more than the 24 trophies on his mantel. Not that he proved inconsistent with a club in his hand; in his last five starts prior to the Players Championship, he managed to finish no worse than sixth. On the contrary, it was precisely because he looked automatic out on the course that his relative lack of hardware seemed inappropriate. And he had his chances; he teed off in the final group on Day Four thrice in those same five starts, only to walk off empty-handed.
Under the circumstances, McIlroy cannot but be delighted in his performance. An up-and-down round had him a stroke behind red-hot Jim Furyk after the 14th, and he seemed to make his standing worse with an errant tee shot. Coming in, however, he was nothing short of golden. On the next two holes, he claimed birdies off an outstanding bunker shot from 180 feet out and a whopping 347-yard drive, the longest of the final round. He then capped his effort with pars on the tricky island-green 17th and dangerous 18th. With the outcome on the line, he managed to forge ahead and, more importantly, stay ahead.
No doubt, the outcome figures to provide McIlroy with timely confidence. The Masters is up next, and his solid showing under pressure at TPC Sawgrass is just what he needed to silence critics questioning his capacity to contend for a fifth major title. It’s also what he needed to hold the demons inside him at bay. As he noted in the aftermath of his triumph, “to step up and make those good swings, it’s very satisfying knowing that it’s in there when it needs to be.” And with Augusta slated to play similarly, he should be the favorite to win and finally forge a career grand slam. “I’m playing some of the best golf of my life.” Enough said.
 
Anthony L. Cuaycong has been writing Courtside since BusinessWorld introduced a Sports section in 1994.

1...9,9699,9709,971...12,983Page 9,970 of 12,983
© 2024 BusinessWorld Publishing.
All rights reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines
Facebook Instagram Linkedin Twitter Youtube