Home Blog Page 8697

Another possible typhoon this week as LPA enters Philippine area

THE LOW pressure area (LPA) east of Luzon has entered the Philippine area Monday afternoon, and weather bureau PAGASA said it could develop into a typhoon by today or tomorrow. PAGASA Weather Specialist Aldczar D. Aurelio said the LPA was located 1,025 km east of Virac, Catanduanes as of 3 p.m. Monday. The trough of the LPA will bring cloudy skies with scattered rains and thunderstorms in the Visayas, Bicol, Northern Mindanao, Caraga, Davao, Quezon, Mindoro, Marinduque, and Romblon. Meanwhile, the northeast monsoon is expected to bring light rains over the Central Luzon Region and parts of the northern Luzon area.

Valenzuela grants amnesty on property transfer tax surcharge

THE VALENZUELA City government has passed a law granting amnesty on the transfer tax surcharges owed by the heir/s of a deceased property owner. Ordinance No. 612, enacted by the city council on Oct. 21 and published on Nov. 11, is in line with Republic Act No. 11213, the Tax Amnesty Act. “A tax relief shall be imposed on all surcharges and interests on local transfer tax on estates of decedent/s who died on or before 31 December 2017 only and shall be availed by the legal heir/s administrator or executor until 14 June 2021,” the ordinance states. It takes effect 15 days from Monday’s publication. Mayor Rexlon T. Gatchalian or his deputized representative has also been granted authority to issue additional guidelines and directives for the implementation of the ordinance. RA 11213, signed into law in February, provides a one-time opportunity to settle estate tax obligations. Valuation of properties will be based on fair market value at the time of the owner’s death. — Vann Marlo M. Villegas

Iloilo to auction P90M PECO assets with unpaid property taxes

THE ILOILO City government is putting up for auction today, Nov. 12, the assets of Panay Electric Co. (PECO), which have unpaid real estate taxes for two years. Mayor Jerry P. Treñas on Monday said the City Treasurer’s Office will proceed with the sale of the assets valued at P90 million. “I was told that this real property tax has been pending for the past two years and, well I think it’s about time that this has to be finally resolved,” he said in an interview. Norman F. Tabud, head of the City Business Permits and Licensing Office (BPLO), earlier said they have not issued a permit to PECO due to the outstanding taxes. Last March 12, the BPLO issued a notice of violation against PECO following a memorandum from the City Treasurer’s Office over the tax due. Mr. Tabud said PECO replied and manifested that they have been paying their business licensing fees to the court. The mayor said PECO has offered a settlement, but the amount was not accepted by the city government. He added that PECO, which is currently engaged in another legal battle over the expropriation of its assets by the new distribution franchise holder MORE Electric and Power Corp., is not being singled out as the properties of delinquent tax payers will also be auctioned off. PECO has yet to issue a statement as of this writing. — Emme Rose S. Santiagudo

PHIVIDEC says agri firms have a part in industrialization

THE PHIVIDEC Industrial Authority (PIA) wants the big players of Davao Region’s agricultural sector to take an active role in defining Mindanao’s position in the country’s industrialization program. “I am sure there are a lot of companies here in Davao that also want industrialization,” PIA Chief Executive Officer and Administrator Franklin M. Quijano said in a recent interview. He cited as examples fresh fruit exporters Tagum Agricultural Development Company, Inc. (TADECO) and Lapanday Foods Corp., and DMI Medical Supply Company Inc., maker of the MX3 dietary supplement. PIA and the PHIVIDEC Industrial Estate in Misamis Oriental-Special Economic Zone (PIE-MO) Industries Association, Inc. are hosting the first Philippine Industrial Summit in Mindanao on Nov. 26 to 28, to be held in Cagayan de Oro City. The summit aims to speed up industrial development of Mindanao by strengthening links between the private and public sectors. “For private individuals and captains of the industry on the same page while they are competing with each other perhaps they may have forgotten that the role of each of them has a very important contribution in making an industrial Philippines,” Mr. Quijano said.

CORRIDORS
The summit is supported by the Japanese and Chinese consulates in Davao City, the European Chamber of Commerce in the Philippines, and the Mindanao Development Authority (MinDA). Under MinDA’s Mindanao Development Corridors strategy, the Northern Mindanao Region, where the PHIVIDEC Industrial Estate is located, along with mining region Caraga are envisioned as the industrial center of Mindanao. The mainland’s south-central areas, including Davao, will serve as the food, agribusiness, and logistics cluster. “This is the first Philippine Industrial Summit in Mindanao. We need people to answer the question: What is your imagery of modern industrial Philippines?” Mr. Quijano said. The summit is also in line with the implementation of Administrative Order No. 18, issued in June this year, intended to accelerate rural development through the establishment of special economic zones in the countryside. — Maya M. Padillo

Airlines offer free flights for Mindanao earthquake rehab volunteers

THREE AIRLINES have agreed to provide free flights for accredited volunteers who are helping in the rehabilitation work for Mindanao areas damaged by the three major earthquakes in October, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) said. In a statement released by the Department of Transportation on Monday, CAB said four volunteers from the University of the Philippines Structural Engineering Group have already availed of free seats on a Cebu Pacific flight to Cotabato to help in infrastructure damage assessment. The two other companies are Philippine Airlines and Air Asia. CAB said those who may avail of the service include “accredited relief workers, medical personnel and other volunteers.” The carriers are also allocating free cargo space for relief goods and donations to the earthquake victims. On Monday, CAB turned over linens and other donated items from a group of hotel operators for immediate transport to Mindanao.

Nationwide round-up

OCD exec raises concern on creation of disaster resilience department

A JOINT Senate panel agreed on Monday to create the Department of Disaster Resilience (DDR), but an Office of Civil Defense (OCD) official said such an agency might could be “overwhelming” considering the many aspects of disaster management. OCD Undersecretary Ricardo B. Jalad raised concern on the integration of different disaster-related functions into one office. “That would be a very big function to be placed under one department,” Mr. Jalad told the panel, suggesting that the function of the DDR be limited to planning. “Lead role can be latched in the department. For the implementation, it would still rely on the lead agencies.” He cited as an example the rehabilitation of Marawi City, which was devastated in the 2017 seige staged by Islamic State-affiliated local extremists. “For Marawi alone sir, it will be overwhelming for one department to undertake all those reconstruction.” Senator Francis N. Tolentino explained that the creation of the new department would not be overwhelming as existing agencies — such as the Bureau of Fire Protection, Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, and the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration — will only be transferred. BFP is currently under the Department of Interior and Local Government while PHIVOLCS and PAGASA are under the Department of Science and Technology. The Senate joint panel also discussed the bureaucratic and budgetary concerns in establishing a new government office. — Charmaine A. Tadalan

Senate approves Malasakit Center bill on 3rd reading

senate
THE PROPOSED measure establishing Malasakit Centers in all Department of Health (DoH)-run hospitals nationwide and the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) hurdled the Senate on third and final reading on Monday. With 18 affirmative votes and zero negative, the chamber passed Senate Bill No. 1076, or the “Malasakit Centers Act,” intended to put in place a one-stop shop for medical and financial assistance. “The Malasakit Center is one of the solutions the Duterte government has developed to provide quick and quality access to health care to all Filipinos,” Senator Christopher Lawrence T. Go said in his sponsorship speech Monday. The measure was among the bills mentioned by President Rodrigo R. Duterte in his fourth State of the Nation Address last July. Eighteen counterpart measures have also been filed in the House of Representatives, which are currently pending at the committee level. The bill is intended to complement next year’s implementation of the Universal Health Care Act, which will grant all Filipinos access to medicines and health care services. “For most of our countrymen, hospitalization is a luxury they cannot afford. The body may be willing, but the pocket is not. The result is that six in 10 deaths in this country are unattended by a doctor,” Senate President Pro Tempore Ralph G. Recto said in his explanation of vote. — Charmaine A. Tadalan

Nation at a Glance — (11/12/19)

News stories from across the nation. Visit www.bworldonline.com (section: The Nation) to read more national and regional news from the Philippines.

Nation at a Glance — (11/12/19)

John Gokongwei and Q3 GDP

“Choose to be an entrepreneur because then you create value. Choose to be an entrepreneur because the products, services, and jobs you create then become the lifeblood of our nation.”

— John Gokongwei, Jr.

Another icon of Philippine capitalism has passed away. John Gokongwei, Jr., the founder of JG Summit with engagements in airline, telecoms, banking, food, power and real estate, had lived 93 years of a very productive entrepreneurial life.

In the Forbes’ Billionaires list 2018 and 2019, he and his children are the third richest family in the Philippines (see Table 1).

I have not met the man or his other children but I have met his eldest daughter, Robina Gokongwei-Pe, in several lectures and activities of the UP School of Economics Alumni Association (UPSEAA). In the few times that I met Robina, she was the picture of a very humble entrepreneur, often smiling and with no fanfare even in clothing and yet she heads the family’s Robinsons Retail Holdings, the country’s second largest chain of malls.

On May 24 this year, Robina gave a lecture among members of UPSEAA and among the topics she discussed were “The Ten Commandments of Running a Family Business, the Gokongwei Way.” Among such commandments are: No work no pay. No in-laws. No moonlighting. There can be only one boss. Being family is no guarantee of employment. Give the next generation wings. Wow. That is how the father, John Gokongwei, Jr., imparted to the family and corporate personnel, his wisdom in entrepreneurship.

And I have to link this story with the Philippines’ 3rd quarter (Q3) GDP growth that was released by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) last week. The Philippine economy grew 6.2%, somehow good news after growing only 5.6% and 5.5% in Q1 and Q2.

I checked the components of GDP on the demand side, composed of household consumption (C) + government consumption (G) + and private investments (I). The net exports of goods and services (X-M) is not significant because they compensate for each other.

While C has recovered after low inflation rates in July-September, G also grew fast because of higher government spending. The bad news is that I shrank for the second time this year (see Table 2).

The last time the Philippines experienced two consecutive quarters of I contraction was seven years ago, in Q1-Q2 2012. I think the TRAIN 2 bill in 2017, renamed TRABAHO bill in 2018, further renamed CITIRA bill in 2019, is part of this mess as this bill plans to abolish several fiscal incentives at once while promising to cut corporate income tax over 10 years.

Dutertenomics should bear in mind always that private investors and entrepreneurs like the Gokongwei family are the real heroes of any economy because they produce value in many sectors — from fishery and agriculture to food manufacturing and banking, land and air transportation, and so on. Government should have low taxes and fewer regulations, not introduce new sources of business uncertainty.

Meanwhile, I want to congratulate the Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF) for winning the Templeton Freedom Prize Award given by the Atlas Network on Nov. 7 in New York City. FEF’s work on helping legislate the agriculture free patent law — giving formal property rights to farmer beneficiaries — was greatly recognized.

 

Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Minimal Government Thinkers.

minimalgovernment@gmail.com

Did Vice-President Leni Robredo just make a bad judgment?

In accepting the job of co-chair of the Inter-agency Committee on Anti-illegal Drugs (ICAD), Vice-President Leni Robredo said, “In the end, the most important consideration for me is simple: if this is the chance to stop the killings of the innocent and to bring to account those responsible, I will take upon this challenge. They are asking me if I am ready for this job. My question is: Are you ready for me?”

Oh yes, the President and his myrmidons are ready for her. A trap had been set up just for her and a tempting bait dangled. That is why Presidential Spokesman and Legal Adviser Salvador Panelo, Senator/Personal Aide Bong Go, Senate President Tito Sotto, Party-list Representative Michael Defensor and many others were urging her to bite the bait — accept the job, that is — so she can begin to self-destruct.

The position co-chair of ICAD is meaningless, said Barry Gutierrez, spokesperson of the Vice-President. “If you look at the executive order creating (ICAD) the co-chair position is non-existent and has no power,” he explained. Albay Representative Edcel Lagman (no relation, I come from Pampanga) pointed out that the position of co-chair of ICAD is vastly different from President Duterte’s original offer to her to be the drug czar.

This is what the President said when he first mentioned a possible role for Mrs. Robredo in his campaign against illegal drugs: “If she wants, I can commission her to be the drug czar. She has so many complaints. Now if you are better than me, I’ll hand to you full powers over the drug (war). I’ll give you six months. Let’s see if you can handle it.”

It was his angry reaction to Vice-President Robredo’s critical remarks about the President’s war on drugs during an interview with the foreign news agency Reuters. The offer was made in a moment of pique. After the President had calmed down, the offer was watered down to a committee co-chair position, which position has no power. To many political pundits, Mrs. Robredo is bound to fail.

The President’s statement “Let’s see if you can handle it” betrays his serious doubts about Mrs. Robredo’s capability to succeed in containing the illegal drug trade. The President and his minions will see to it that Mrs. Robredo will not succeed to prove that the President was right about his misgivings about her.

As co-chair of a committee she cannot issue directives, much less give orders. She can only formulate policies. ICAD has no less than 20 agencies as members. Before she could formulate policies she has to relate with the heads of those agencies. She cannot formulate policies on her own. She has to obtain the concurrence of her co-chair, Aaron Aquino.

Mr. Aquino does not hold Mrs. Robredo in high regard when it comes to the campaign against illegal drugs. This is what he said of her before she accepted the position offered by President Duterte: “She is bound to fail because the Vice-President has no experience in dealing with law enforcers”

With Mr. Aquino’s estimation of her low, Mr. Aquino would most likely be dismissive of Mrs. Robredo’s ideas and suggestions. The enforcers of drug laws are directly under the command of Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) Director-General Mr. Aquino. Mrs. Robredo has no command authority over them.

The people who elected Mr. Duterte president were those who were inveigled by his overweening promise to eradicate the drug menace in six months, maybe even in three months. He failed to fulfill that promise. Anybody who can succeed in curbing the illegal drug trade to a significant degree would surely win the adulation of the people.

If Mrs. Robredo achieves some success in the war against illegal drugs, her political stock would improve markedly, making her presidential timber. Such an eventually would threaten the presidential aspirations of presidential daughter Sara, and Senators Manny Pacquiao and Cynthia Villar.

President Duterte will do everything to minimize the chances of Vice-President Robredo, or anybody from the opposition, of being elected president for fear of her doing what Cory Aquino, Gloria Arroyo, Noynoy Aquino had done to their immediate predecessors: that is, to file charges of massive graft and corruption, betrayal of the Republic, and/or violation of the Bill of Rights, etc. against them.

Besides, Mrs. Robredo is bound to fail. President Duterte, by his own admission, has failed to rid the country of the drug menace, despite the entire police force pledging blind loyalty to him and the secretaries of justice, past and present, turning a blind eye to the excesses of the police force in putting an end to the illegal drug trade. With no authority over the enforcers of the drug laws and with the head of the PDEA having a low regard for her with respect to law enforcement, ICAD Co-chair Robredo has no chance of success.

The Vice-President herself took cognizance of the dubiousness of the appointment. Said she: “Even if we say this offer is playing politics and that agencies will not follow me and they will do everything for me to fail, I am ready to endure all this because if I could save at least one innocent life, my principles and my heart are telling me, I should give it a try.”

After all, she has nothing to lose, she said. But she has. By accepting the position of co-chair of ICAD, she had lost the confidence of her political allies and civil society groups in her making good judgment. A president lacking good judgment would be disastrous for the country. Civil society groups are now wondering if Maria Leonor Gerona Robredo, as president, would exercise good judgment consistently.

 

Oscar P. Lagman, Jr. is a retired corporate executive, business consultant, and management professor. He has been a politicized citizen since his college days in the late 1950s.

Federalism: For better or for worse?

(First of two parts)

Federalism has been a hot national issue ever since the present administration assumed the reins of government. As one of its campaign propositions in the last presidential elections, it must have been one major factor that propelled this present dispensation to power!

However, when the draft of the proposed federalist Constitution came out (but before any serious campaign or debate on its merits could be had), it did not rate high in the surveys — as to its necessity nor as to its timeliness in changing the existing Constitution — apparently for reasons of lack of adequate public information at the time.

As is usual in vibrant liberal democracies, doubts arouse, specially from skeptics and traditional oppositionists, as to: (1) whether Federalism is the right way to spur and cascade development to the provinces; (2) whether we can afford the cost of the shift to a new federalist political order; and, (3) whether the regions by themselves are prepared to administer and economically sustain the new governance structure.

These macro-points of uncertainties boil down to the question of which is better for the country and its people: to continue with the existing unitary centralized political system (which this country has had since Philippine independence to-date), or to shift to the proposed federal political order (involving the territorial division of power between constituent regions and a strong central government marked by a combination of shared rule and self-rule enshrined in the Constitution)?

ON OUR EXISTING UNITARY SYSTEM
To tackle this question is to get down to brass tacks, and ask ourselves: Is our existing unitary system a good fit to our territorially based population subsets? Does its centralized governance orientation augur well to spur development preferences and/or alternatives in those disparate “portions of our geography and population” far from the center of power… distant from the policy-making authority? Has the delegation of powers to provincial units, under the local government code passed by Congress (which Congress itself can take back or change anytime on its own) brought out the desired results in terms of human development and equitable economic progress for all?

The condition of body politic to date doesn’t seem to reflect the desired end-goals expected of a just political order, where the blessings of a free market economy should have provided nationwide beneficial results that go beyond the circle of the elite. Inclusive growth and/or wide dispersal of an equitable economic development — geographic or demographic — remains an elusive dream. For obviously, development is highly concentrated in Metro Manila and the two regions close to the center of power, resulting in the now legendary congestion at the center.

Whereas, the majority of the regions (which are wittingly or unwittingly under-represented, particularly in the Legislature’s upper chamber) are haplessly left behind and very much smarting from:

• The unsettled issue of poverty and surplus that haunts the vast countryside;

• The highly protectionist industrial posturing in business/commerce under a scenario of oligarchic opportunism that constrains broad economic development;

• The widening gap between the have and the have-nots in a setting of jobless growth;

• The desperation that leads to criminality, corruption and/or drug addiction, which unfortunately are already upon us.

Since the last century, our political system hasn’t gotten us far enough when it comes to how best to equitably improve our economic wellbeing and general human welfare. Meanwhile, advances in all aspects of human affairs have been doing great amongst our neighbors in the ASEAN over the last three decades.

WHERE LIES THE FLAW?
Surveys tell us that as “you go further away from the center of power…, of economic activity,” the poverty incidence goes up as household income and productivity decline, attributed generally to underdevelopment occasioned by official neglect, if not by the unmitigated mal-exploitation, of available natural and human resources abetted by regulatory indifference under a centrist political order. It is said that about two-thirds of the country’s economic wealth is produced and consumed in only three regions while the remaining third is shared by the other 14 regions far from the center. As it is, we have decelerated almost to the tail-end in the ASEAN in terms of economic development.

Could it be that we simply have been electing to positions of power pedantic personable political stewards who proved to be square pegs in round holes? Garbage in, garbage out so to speak? Or we have just been the naïve victims of our own political system? “Of a system where administrative and fiscal powers is a monopoly of a central government; where economic power is a monopoly of the oligarchy; and where political power is a monopoly of political dynasties?” A system operating under a constraining structural framework where even lofty constitutional provisions, though beneficial to the collective interest of a people, may be sidelined and be unimplemented (especially when such provisions go against the self-interest of policy-makers and/or legislators), and so easily at that, all because they are not framed as self-executing provisions? One example is the laudable anti-dynasty provision featured in the 1987 Constitution. But because it needs further legislation to get it implemented, nothing positive ever happened in the legislative front over three decades to date!

Or could it be because we are more deeply into western liberal democracy with a strong focus on the rule of free market forces and the primacy of individual rights and interest, as against our Asian neighbours, who “chose to also seriously consider the collective interest, and gave due weight to the interest of the community/nation at large”?

Given this post-EDSA sorry governance backdrop, what logic have we to continue with a unitary political system that does not seem to work for the general welfare? As Albert Einstein puts it, “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different result is Insanity.”

This article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or the MAP.

 

Antonio T. Hernandez is management and development finance consultant; Past President& Advisory Council member of the Government Association of CPAs; Past Director – PICPA; and former Senior officer of Land Bank of the Philippines.

map@map.org.ph

ath7543@yahoo.com

http://map.org.ph

Persons with disabilities and the State with disabilities

The period of Nov. 10 to 16 is Deaf Awareness Week in the Philippines, while Dec. 3 is the “International Day of Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) in the Philippines. The annual celebrations of Deaf Awareness Week and the International Day of PWDs in the country started in 1991 and 2006, respectively.

Republic Act (RA) No. 7277 or the 1992 Philippine Magna Carta for Disabled Persons defines PWDs as “those suffering from restriction of different abilities, as a result of a mental, physical or sensory impairment, to perform an activity in the manner or within the range considered normal for a human being.” Impairment, according to the law, refers to “any loss, diminution or aberration of psychological, physiological, or anatomical structure or function”; disability as “(1) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more psychological, physiological or anatomical function of an individual or activities of such individual; (2) a record of such an impairment; or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment”; and handicap as “a disadvantage for a given individual resulting from an impairment or a disability, that limits or prevents the functions or activity, that is considered normal given the age and sex of the individual.”

The Philippine Magna Carta predates the 2008 United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) of which the country is a signatory. The Magna Carta outlines the obligations of the Philippine government to protect and provide for the rights and privileges of disabled persons in order for them to fully participate in all aspects of socio-political life. The UN Convention sets out the obligations of States Parties “to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity”.

While the Philippine Magna Carta for PWDs remains to be the primary law recognizing the rights of Filipinos with disabilities, the country has many other laws and formally decreed policies protecting and promoting the rights of PWDs from the 1950s to 1980s. Among these, Batasang Pambansa Blg. 344 or The Accessibility Law and its Amended Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) serve as the most significant developments in the direction of promoting the interests and welfare of PWDs in the Philippines. To quote the Philippine Commission on Human Rights in its 2010 advisory on the implementation of the law, both the law and its amended IRR “lay out the requirements for the mainstreaming of persons with disabilities in the country through the recognition of their rights, acknowledgement of their special needs and elimination of discrimination against them in terms of accessibility to transportation, among others” as well as “building requirements and transport requirements under Part IV of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR).” The Accessibility Law penalizes violators including corporations who violate the law with fine and imprisonment and deportation in case of violations by an alien or foreigner.

The Magna Carta for PWDs has been amended in 2007 to include “Other Privileges and Incentives and Prohibitions on Verbal, Non-verbal Ridicule and Vilification against Persons with Disability” and in 2010 for the establishment of People with Disability Affairs Office in every province, city and municipality in the country. Further amendments to the law in 2013 and 2016 provided for equal employment opportunity for PWDs and exemption privilege from value added tax, respectively.

But how effective are the laws in protecting PWDs in the country? Is the Philippine State able or disabled in enforcing the laws? What impairs the State and despairs PWDs?

In its 2010 advisory on the implementation of the Accessibility Law, the CHR noted that “the implementation of this law remains inadequate if not manifestly scarce.” Buildings and the public transport system remain neglectful of the special needs of PWDs. Almost seven years after, the CHR released its “Inputs on Access to Justice of Persons with Disabilities in the Philippines” on May 3, 2017 in response to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UHCHR) questionnaire on access to justice of persons with disabilities. The CHR observed that the Supreme Court had authorized trial court judges, through the Office of the Court Administrator, to engage the services of sign language interpreters in 2007. It was in recognition that there are “parties or witnesses who, to be fully understood and to prevent possible miscarriage of justice, may require a sign language interpreter.” By 2012, there were over 2,000 court employees designated as Court Interpreters in trial courts throughout the country. However, there were no such counterparts for sign language interpreting.

In its 2017 response, the CHR noted that there were also no specific institutional budget items for the compensation of services of sign language interpreters. According to the report, “Of 213 cases from 2006-2012 involving deaf parties, only 24% have appointed court interpreters. Of 63 cases of unschooled deaf parties requiring deaf relay interpreters, 75% have no interpreter.”

The issue of access to justice is particularly challenging to women and girls with disabilities. In 2015, the Philippine Alliance of Women with Disabilities, a subset of member organizations of the Philippine Coalition on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities documented gender-based violence among women with disabilities in the Philippines and the problems that women with disabilities are confronted with. The Alliance noted that while each court in the country “has virtually a full-time position for Court Interpreter who provides services for spoken languages, there are no such State personnel or provisions for deaf women and children (where rape is as common among one out of three women, or 65-70% cases of sexual abuse of deaf girls).” The Alliance also noted that “even where there may be awareness to provide sign language interpreting, the police, office of the prosecutor, and trial courts rely completely on civil society for the provision of those services…” and “in the few instances that this accessibility is provided, it is characterized by uninformed and bureaucratic service coordination, and unreliable compensation of sign language interpreters (if at all).”

The issues surrounding PWDs’ access to justice in the Philippines was addressed by the enactment of RA No. 11106 or the Filipino Sign Language (FSL) Act on Oct. 30, 2018. Under the law, Filipino Sign Language is declared as the national sign language of the Philippines and therefore, “the medium of official communication in all transactions involving the deaf, and as the language of instruction of deaf education, without prejudice to the use of other forms of communication depending on individual choice or preference.”

Filipino Sign Language is mandated as the official language of legal interpretation for the deaf in all public hearings, proceedings, and transactions of the courts, quasi-judicial agencies, and other tribunals. The Filipino Sign Language Law (FSL) requires quasi-judicial agencies and other tribunals to ensure the availability of a qualified sign language interpreter in all proceedings involving the deaf “to ensure effective access to justice for the deaf on an equal basis with others and to facilitate their effective role as direct and indirect participants in the legal system.”

One year and 13 days today after FSL became a law, can we see any improvement in the plight of our brothers and sisters who are either hearing-impaired or deaf?

 

Diana J. Mendoza, PhD, is Chair of the Department of Political Science at the Ateneo de Manila University.

Best-of-three NCAA finals series begins

By Michael Angelo S. Murillo
Senior Reporter

SEASON 95 of the National Collegiate Athletic Association men’s basketball ushers in the championship phase with the best-of-three finals series between four-peat-seeking San Beda Red Lions and rivals Letran Knights kicking off today at the Mall of Asia Arena.

After four months of classification play and step-ladder semifinals, left standing are the Lions and Knights, who are once again disputing the NCAA title after three years.

San Beda earned a direct trip to the finals after sweeping the elimination round and going 18-0, rendering in the process the semifinals as a step-ladder setup.

In the finals, the Lions bring with them their top-ranked defense, which only allowed 61.7 points a game in the eliminations. On offense, they are not doing badly either, averaging 80.7 points, good for fourth in the league.

Leading the way for San Beda is just-named season most valuable player Calvin Oftana, who is averaging solid all-around numbers of 15.6 points, 8.2 rebounds, 2.7 assists and 1.2 blocks.

James Canlas is backstopping him with 14.1 points, 5.6 boards and 2.8 assists with foreign student athlete Donald Tankoua adding 13.2 points and 7.5 boards.

Point guard Evan Nelle, meanwhile, has been good for 10.2 points, 6.7 assists, 4.5 rebounds and 1.6 steals.

As a team, the Lions are the leaders in a number of categories, including total field goal percentage (44.7%), three-point field goal percentage (33.2%) and assists (19.2 dimes) as well as the least turnover-prone (14.5 miscues per outing).

“It’s a bit of a fulfilment on my part that we got the sweep. But our work is not yet done. It’s going to be a tough finals whoever we are going to face,” said San Beda coach Boyet Fernandez.

FOUR-PEAT SPOILERS?
Looking to derail the four-peat aspirations of the Lions are the Knights, who are riding a huge momentum after successfully overcoming the two hurdles in the step-ladder in convincing fashion.

Third-seeded Letran first won past the number four team San Sebastian Stags, 85-80, on Nov. 5 before topping second seeds Lyceum Pirates, 92-88, on Nov. 8 to barge into the finals of NCAA Season 95.

Against the Pirates, the Knights rode the game-long brilliance of guard Fran Yu, who finished with 20 points and six assists.

Also stepping up for Letran were veterans Larry Muyang, Bonbon Batiller and Jerrick Balanza, who all scored 11 points or more.

It was close match for much of the time until the Knights made some separation early in the fourth quarter, holding an 84-72 lead with five minutes left.

The Pirates desperately tried to rally back but they would fall short as Letran held strong to preserve the victory and earn the finals ticket.

“I give it to our veterans. They never gave up and they really wanted to beat Lyceum and advance to the finals,” said Letran coach Bonnie Tan after they clinched a finals seat.

In the elimination round, San Beda defeated Letran, 70-66, in the first round, and 75-63 in the second round.

Back in Season 91 when the two teams last met in the finals, the Knights topped the Lions in their best-of-three series, 2-1.