Home Blog Page 12421

Visa says over 5 million payments affected by June outage

London, United Kingdom — Payment systems giant Visa said Tuesday that a massive technical glitch earlier this month had affected 5.2 million card transactions, almost half of which were in Britain.
Visa, revealing the details in a letter to a British parliamentary committee that is probing the matter, said the “rare” disruption prevented many cardholders form making payments in Europe for 10 hours on Friday June 1.
And the company apologised “unreservedly” for the failure and outlined plans for a compensation scheme.
“Overall, for cards issued both in the UK and elsewhere … 51.2 million Visa transactions were initiated and sent to Visa’s European systems for processing,” wrote Visa Europe chief executive Charlotte Hogg.
“Of these, 5.2 million failed to process correctly,” she added in the letter to Treasury Select Committee chair Nicky Morgan.
The outage was caused by a “very rare partial failure” of a switch in one of Visa’s data centres, Hogg added. It has since been fixed.
Visa said there were 27.6 million transactions made in the UK during the disruption, of which 2.4 million failed to process properly.
“At its peak, the disruption affected people in the midst of returning home from work, socialising in restaurants and pubs, and doing end-of-day shopping,” Hogg said in the letter published Tuesday.
“We take seriously our important role in supporting financial stability in the UK.
“A disruption to our processing that impacts consumers at any time is unacceptable, let alone during a busy Friday afternoon,” she added.
“We apologize again unreservedly to everyone who was affected by the incident,” Hogg said.
“Visa, together with our financial institution partners, has quickly implemented a compensation programme for cardholders.” — AFP

Peso rebounds slightly on remittances

THE PESO regained some strength against the dollar on Tuesday on the back of stronger remittances in April.
The local unit closed at P53.44 against the dollar on Wednesday, four centavos stronger than the P53.48-per-dollar finish on Monday.
The peso bounced back immediately as it opened the session at P53.39 versus the greenback. It rose to as high as P53.31, while its intraday low was at P53.49 a dollar.
Dollars traded surged to $733.7 million from the $568 million that switched hands the previous day.
A trader attributed the rebound of the local currency to the remittances report released Monday.
“The peso slightly appreciated following the release of strong foreign remittances data,” the trader said in an e-mail.
Money sent home by Filipinos overseas amounted to $2.347 billion in April, 12.7% bigger than the $2.083-billion inflows logged in the same period last year, data released by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) on Monday showed.
Ruben Carlo O. Asuncion, chief economist at UnionBank of the Philippines, said in a previous interview that there might be a correlation between the peso weakness and remittances.
“The probability that more remittances will flow into the economic system is high when more peso is exchanged for foreign currency, particularly the US dollar,” he said.
However, another trader said the data had little effect on the peso-dollar trading as investors are still concerned over the renewed trade tensions between the United States and China.
“The momentum of a strong dollar was really strong. Although it was a good data, it didn’t affect the peso-dollar that much,” the trader said.
Reuters reported that China accused the US of initiating a trade war, saying it will fight back firmly if Washington publishes an additional list of tariffs on Chinese goods.
“There is still a risk-off sentiment among investors due to the trade tensions between US and China. With that, investors tend to prefer safe-haven currencies over riskier assets,” the second trader said.
“That’s why we saw the US dollar, Japanese yen and Swiss franc moving higher.”
Mr. Asuncion noted in a Tuesday text message that the downward movement of the peso “is expected to be a trend until an easing of the [trade tensions] is seen.”
Meanwhile, BSP Governor Nestor A. Espenilla, Jr. said the monetary authority “is ready to act to prevent excessive peso volatility and overshooting due to speculative activities.”
“The movement of the peso is market-driven. Its medium-term stability is well supported by sound macroeconomic fundamentals,” Mr. Espenilla said in his speech in Tokyo, Japan for the government’s non-deal road show.
For Wednesday, the traders expect the peso to move between P53.30 and P53.50 versus the dollar, while Mr. Asuncion gave a higher P53.40-P53.60 range. — Karl Angelo N. Vidal

PSEi slumps to 15-month trough on US-China rift

By Arra B. Francia, Reporter
THE Philippine Stock Exchange index (PSEi) slumped to its lowest level in 15 months Tuesday, June 19, as the trade war between two of the world’s largest economies escalated, while analysts back home looked toward the local central bank’s policy meeting.
The PSEi dropped 1.36% or 101.50 points to 7,312.61 on Tuesday. It reached an intraday low of 7,253.12, the worst since the index hit a trough of 7,222.15 during the March 27, 2017 session. The broader all-shares index also gave up 1.08% or 49.33 points to 4,481.71.
“Market continued its correction today as most of the regional markets were down due to the tariff that the US President Trump would like to impose on China and other trading partners. If the global growth is affected, definitely it will cascade down to the emerging markets,” Diversified Securities, Inc. trader Aniceto K. Pangan said in a phone interview on Tuesday.
Markets abroad also stayed in negative territory. The Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.41% or 103.01 points to 24,987.47, while the S&P 500 index went down 0.21% or 5.91 points to 2,773.75. The Nasdaq Composite index was flat with a 0.01% increase or 0.65 point to 7,747.02.
Asian markets were left bleeding on Tuesday, mostly weighed down by companies supplying stocks to multinational tech firm Apple, Inc. as investors digested the effects of Mr. Trump’s additional tariffs.
Sectoral indices back home all ended in the red, led by holding firms which declined 1.73% or 128.30 points to 7,251.25 and services which likewise lost 1.73% or 25.52 points to 1,444.42. Mining and oil shed 1.63% or 161.06 points to 9,683.13; financials dropped 1.40% or 25.80 points to 1,816.03; property slipped 0.82% or 29.59 points to 3,558.24; while industrials was down 0.06% or 6.75 points to 10,554.03.
Regina Capital Development Corp. Managing Director Luis A. Limlingan also noted cautiousness ahead of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ (BSP) policy meeting Wednesday, June 20.
“Many are debating whether the BSP will leave policy rates unchanged, keeping the overnight reverse [repurchase] rate at 3.25% and the overnight deposit rate at 2.75%. This is because overall inflation has been creeping up, driven mostly by supply side factors and TRAIN. The peso has also weakened, touching P53.50 to the [US dollar] as a result of this,” Mr. Limlingan said in a mobile message.
Some 909.21 million issues switched hands Tuesday, June 19, for a turnover of P6.89 billion, slightly lower than the previous session’s P7.75 billion.
Decliners outpaced advancers, 125 to 70, while 47 names were unchanged.
Net foreign outflows slimmed to P867.92 million from Monday’s P1.29 billion.
Moving forward, Diversified Securities’ Mr. Pangan placed the benchmark index’s support level in the coming days between 7,100 to 7,200.

Children separated from parents at US border sob, wail desperately

Los Angeles — Several Central American children separated from parents at the southern US border are heard desperately sobbing and wailing in a recording released Monday by transparency group ProPublica, some so hard they almost cannot breathe.
At least 2,300 of these youngsters have been separated from their parents since April, when President Donald Trump’s administration launched its “zero tolerance” immigration policy.
In the past, some migrants entering illegally were caught and then released. Now, the US administration has moved to prosecute anyone who seeks to enter the country illegally, which it says requires the children to be taken away.
“Mommy! I want to go with dad,” a young girl is heard crying out on the audio recording, sobbing so hard she is short of breath.
With the volume of the wailing shrill, and coming from multiple kids, a US Border Patrol agent can be heard saying in Spanish: “well, we have quite an orchestra here. The only thing missing is a conductor.”
“I don’t want them to stop my dad,” one little girl is heard saying between sobs.
Another apparently older girl adds: “I don’t want to get separated from my dad.” The children were mostly from El Salvador and Guatemala, both violence-plagued Central American countries.
The US action has sparked outrage at home — from both Trump’s Democratic foes and his fellow Republicans — and around the world, as well as concerns from even First Lady Melania Trump.
One utterly distressed Salvadoran girl, which ProPublica said was all of six, can be heard begging authorities to call her aunt.
“I can go home with my auntie, at least,” the girl said, proudly explaining that she memorized it. “I have her number. Then after my auntie gets me to bring me home with her, my mom will come as soon as she can, to pick me up.”
The audio was recorded last week, according to ProPublica.
The girl’s aunt said the experience had been truly difficult.
“Imagine getting a call from your six-year-old niece. She’s crying and begging me to come and get her out,” the aunt told ProPublica.
“She says ‘I promise I will be really good. But please, please get me out of here. I am all alone.'” — AFP

Supreme Court hears landmark gay marriage case

The Philippines’ top court heard arguments on Tuesday, June 19, for the legalization of gay marriage, a historic first in the overwhelmingly Catholic nation.
Two same-sex couples denied licenses to wed urged the Supreme Court to strike down a 1987 law that states marriage must be between a man and a woman.
“When the right to marry, a decision so personal, so intimate and so life-changing, is denied to LGBT people, the state is not valuing their dignity,” lawyer Jesus Falcis, who is also a co-plaintiff, told justices in Manila.
It took three years for the Supreme Court to schedule a hearing and the case will likely move at a glacial pace.
Judges will next hear from the government’s lawyers, but the court does not set itself deadlines to issue rulings and cases sometimes take years to resolve.
Legal experts say the case is still highly significant.
“The decision will be landmark because the court has never pronounced on this,” University of the Philippines law professor Antonio La Vina told AFP.
“Obviously, it would be even more landmark, more historic if they say marriage is not between a man and a woman.”
Outside the court on Tuesday, about 20 members of Manila’s LGBT community waved rainbow flags and lit multi-coloured candles in support of the petition.
Danton Remoto, founder of the LBGT political party Ang Ladlad (Out of the Closet) told AFP he welcomed the Supreme Court’s hearing of the case.
“A space has been opened up to discuss this case legally,” Remoto added.
Church v state
The Philippines — where 80% of a population of over 100 million is Catholic — is the only place outside of the Vatican where divorce is outlawed. Abortion is also illegal, largely due to church influence.
However the plaintiffs may have an ally in President Rodrigo Duterte, who has expressed support for gay marriage but since backed off from a campaign trail pledge to legalise it.
“I am for same-sex marriage. The problem is, we’ll have to change the law. But we can change the law,” Duterte told a gathering of LGBT people in his southern home city of Davao in December last year.
The case comes as Duterte pushes back against the country’s clergy, who are at odds with some of his key policies including a deadly drug war that has killed thousands.
In May, Duterte allies in the House of Representatives passed landmark divorce legislation, though it is unlikely to become law due to lack of support in the Senate.
Church leaders have fought efforts to legalize divorce, same-sex marriage and abortion, while losing a long battle against a state-funded free contraceptives law. — AFP

Sereno ouster final

THE SUPREME COURT (SC) en banc upheld on Tuesday its landmark May 11 decision to grant the quo warranto petition seeking to void Maria Lourdes P. A. Sereno’s appointment as Chief Justice, thereby dismissing with finality her reversal plea.
According to lawyer Theodore O. Te, the high court’s spokesperson, the SC maintained its landmark 8-6 ruling which favored the quo warranto petition by Solicitor-General Jose C. Calida.
The petition accused Ms. Sereno of lacking integrity for not completely submitting her Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) to the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) as a requirement for the post.
Mr. Te also noted: “[T]he 90-day period for filling the vacancy in the Office of Chief Justice commences today, 19 June 2018,” in accordance with Article VIII, Section 4, Paragraph 1 of the 1987 Constitution.
Ms. Sereno, addressing supporters at the University of the Philippines in Diliman minutes after the SC’s announcement, called the petition “unjust” and her “ouster a call to action for all of us.”
She also accused President Rodrigo R. Duterte of ordering his government’s lawyer, Mr. Calida, to file the quo warranto petition.
When asked what Ms. Sereno’s next move would be, lawyer Anacleto A. Lacanilao III, her spokesperson, said she would “vacate her office and continue to be the voice of the people.”
Mr. Calida told reporters he was happy with the SC’s dismissal, saying, “This is a triumph of justice.”
Ms. Sereno’s motion for reconsideration urged the court to reverse the decision as it allegedly violated her right to due process when six of her peers refused to inhabit themselves despite allegedly showing impartiality towards her.
The six Ms. Sereno cited were Associate Justices Diosdado M. Peralta, Teresita L. De Castro, Francis H. Jardeleza, Lucas P. Bersamin, Samuel R. Martires, and Noel G. Tijam, the author of the original May 11 decision.
Several opposition politicians slammed the SC’s decision, with Vice President Maria Leonor “Leni” G. Robredo saying in a statement released also on Tuesday, “Today, eight members of the highest court in the land cemented into jurisprudence a ruling widely decried — within and outside the legal profession — as unjust, both in its substance as well as the manner in which it was reached.”
Presidential Spokesperson Harry L. Roque, Jr. said in part: “Tapos na po ang pagiging chief justice ni [Maria Lourdes] Sereno (Ms. Sereno’s position as chief justice is over). We wish her good luck in her everyday life as a private citizen.”
In his statement on Tuesday, Speaker Pantaleon D. Alvarez said “The Supreme Court ruling has also rendered moot and academic the impeachment proceedings against Sereno at the House of Representatives. As a consequence, we would now have to consign such proceedings to our archives.”
Majority Leader Rodolfo C. Fariñas of the House of Representatives said in a message to reporters: “The Rules Committee will recommend to Plenary for the dismissal of the Impeachment Case against then Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno for being moot and academic since she is no longer a public officer subject to impeachment proceedings. Without any impeachable officer, there can be no impeachment proceedings.”
Former Senate president Aquilino L. Pimentel III said the resolution to express the sense of the Senate on the quo warranto case can still be adopted.
“‘Sense of the Senate’ reso simply states the sense of the Senate on a certain matter. It is not meant for any other purpose. Hence, it can be passed anytime depending on the sense of the majority,” Mr. Pimentel said.
Senator Panfilo M. Lacson, who earlier questioned the merits of that resolution, said it can still be taken to the plenary upon the resumption of sessions in July.
“While it is obvious that the SC’s final ruling on the petition for quo warranto has rendered the draft resolution moot, academic and without purpose, still, its disposition is something that we as a collegial body will have to vote upon when the 3rd regular session of the 17th Congress opens in July,” Mr. Lacson said. — Dane Angelo M. Enerio with Arjay L. Balinbin and Charmaine A. Tadalan

Cayetano: PHL, China ‘co-control’ Scarborough

FOREIGN AFFAIRS Secretary Alan Peter S. Cayetano on Monday said the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China “co-control” the disputed West Philippine Sea, particularly the waters surrounding Scarborough Shoal, adding that Filipinos are now “free” to fish there despite the now widely-reported incident involving China Coast Guard members reportedly taking the catch of Filipino fishermen.
“I believe at this point in time, may co-control tayo, because malaya na tayong pumupunta (we now have co-control, because we are now free to go there),” Mr. Cayetano told reporters, as shown in video reports by CNN, ABS-CBN and other media.
He added: “But definitely, before President Duterte came in, it was controlled by the Chinese. Now, we can use semantics. Pwede tayong mag (We can) debate, how much control we have. How much hindi (How much is not) controlled. Ang masasabi ko lang (All I can say), our situation now is much, much better than two years ago. Could it be much, much better than today? Definitely. Do we want total control? Definitely. But the reality is matinding negotiations ang dadaanan natin dito (we have to go through intense negotiations).”
President Rodrigo R. Duterte, for his part, said on that occasion marking the Department of Foreign Affairs’ 120th anniversary: “Ilagay ko na lang muna ‘yung China diyanHindi ko naman talaga mabira-bira (I’ll just set aside China for now… I cannot criticize it). China is no pushover. You cannot scare [them]. And even the United States has shown a little bit of apprehension….”
The President also said the Philippines “will never go to a battle that it cannot win.”
“I am not prepared to sacrifice the lives of the Filipino people,” he said.
Asked if the President was pre-empting the results of the Chinese government’s ongoing investigation on the incident, Presidential Spokesperson Harry L. Roque, Jr. on Tuesday said: “Hindi naman po siguro, kasi ang sabi nga ng Presidente, barter pero walang pagkakasundo sa valuation (Maybe not, because the President said it was barter, but there was no agreement on the valuation). So, hindi po siya talagang (it was not a) perfected contract of barter.”
Mr. Cayetano, for his part, said in his speech: “We would like to assure the public that we are protecting every single square inch of our territory.”
“President Duterte, even before he won, knows independent foreign policy; he understands geopolitics,” he also said. — Arjay L. Balinbin

Same-sex marriage dangerous for LGBT movement — SC’s Leonen

THE PETITION to legalize same sex-marriage in the Philippines may be dangerous to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) movement, Supreme Court Associate Justice Mario Victor “Marvic” F. Leonen said at the oral arguments for the case held during LGBT Pride Month in June.
In his opening statement before the high court on Tuesday, petitioner and lawyer Jesus M. Falcis III said that Articles 1 and 2 of Executive Order (EO) No. 209 (Family Code) were unconstitutional as they deprive same-sex couples the right to marry without substantive due process, denied them equal protection of laws, and violate their religious freedom.
According to the EO, “marriage is a special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman” and that the contracting parties must be “male and female.”
Mr. Falcis claimed this was unconstitutional as same-sex marriage was a “fundamental and constitutional right.”
Mr. Leonen, however, pointed out to Mr. Falcis that “you are now going to put squarely for the Supreme Court of this Republic an issue which will require a very intimate reading of the provisions of the Constitution.”
“You claim it is a fundamental and constitutional right. On the other, (Solicitor-General Jose C. Calida) takes the position that it is a right, yes, but it is a statutory construct which means that the right to marry may be there but it needs to be clarified in Congress rather than in the court,” Mr. Leonen also said.
He added: “the Solicitor-General takes (a) dangerous position for your side because it actually argues that the Constitutional provision which says that marriage founds a family only refers to a male and a female — an opposite sex relation.”
“If this court adopts that second position, then even same sex relationships will no longer be a political question. It will not be able to pass any bill in the House or in the Senate because the Supreme Court might say, if it agrees with part of the argument of the Solicitor-General that marriage is only for (opposite sex) couples constitutionally.”
Mr. Falcis’ petition was the first same-sex marriage case to be debated by the high court in oral arguments.
In show of support for the petition, LGBT allies gathered in front of the SC building in Padre Faura, Manila.
“This (petition) strengthened our resolve to keep on pushing what is traditionally accepted and the legal obstacles that hinder us from being accorded the same rights and legal protections heterosexuals enjoy and be recognized as well for our societal contributions wherever the front lines the struggle for equality take us,” said student leader and activist Vince Liban of the University of the Philippine’s Babaylan. — D.A.M.E.

How to play a US-China trade war? Investors map out tactics

A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money, as one American politician once said. Now that the U.S.-China trade spat is encompassing potentially hundreds of billions of dollars, investors are under pressure to figure out how to respond.
The initial reaction to President Donald Trump’s threat to slap tariffs on an additional $200 billion of Chinese imports was to bail out of U.S. stock futures and pile into the yen, the trusty safe-haven currency thanks to Japan’s record net-creditor status. Contracts on the S&P 500 Index were down 1.3 percent and the yen rose 0.7 percent as of 9:54 a.m. in London. Equities also tumbled from Tokyo to Hong Kong, and Treasuries rose as China threatened retaliation.
But how about beyond Tuesday? If the world’s top two economies are now in a trade war, how should investors position themselves? The following are some thoughts from fund managers and strategists.
Blackrock Inc. Australia
“Will it escalate from here? We’d certainly hope not, but it’s certainly a risk,” Craig Vardy, head of fixed income in Australia for BlackRock, said in an interview in Sydney. “If you’ve been running a lot of risks in this market, then chances are you’d be almost under water.”
Taking positions based on the outcome of trade negotiations is difficult because the results are so unknown, so the strategy has been to run low risk in an active bond fund, Vardy said. Also avoid “volatility around tweets” and keep riskier positions for short term bets, he said.
AMP Capital
Central banks remain the key driver for the possible end of the current bull market cycle, said Nader Naeimi, head of dynamic markets at AMP in Sydney.
“This is what I call a Shakespearean market, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing,” he said. “Politics doesn’t end cycles, it’s central banks. But at some point trade skirmishes and increasing tariffs will add to U.S. and global inflation and if that happens and forces the Fed into the corner, then we will have a problem.”
In the meantime, Naeimi is using the currency market for protection. He likes hedging with yen against the Australian dollar, Korean won and Canadian dollar.
“There will be a tragedy somewhere, so we can’t totally dismiss the risk,” he said.
Oanda
While the rhetoric is flying hot and fast between the U.S. and China, it’s more difficult to actually quantify what qualifies as an official trade war, said Stephen Innes, head of trading at Oanda Corp. in Singapore.
“Right now it is tit-for-tat with little economic impact,” he said. “A full-blown war will involve” much greater tariff amounts and goods, which would hurt corporate earnings. “China has the upper hand here. It’s cheap right now so hedging risk now is prudent before it’s too late.”
Innes recommends buying the yen versus the dollar while shorting the Canadian dollar on NAFTA woes and oil price risks. He also likes shorting the Australian dollar as it will “crater” due to its role in the global supply chain and vulnerability to commodities prices.
“U.S. bonds will be a safety umbrella that a lot of investors will seek out.”
Standard Chartered
It’s time for investors to move beyond a “full-on risk” equity strategy and diversify their portfolios into other asset classes such as U.S. government or emerging-market bonds, said Steve Brice, chief investment strategist at Standard Chartered Bank.
Brice prefers dollar-denominated emerging-market bonds over local currencies as the dollar appears to have momentum, he said. Specifically, opportunities can be had in oversold bonds in Turkey, Argentina and Brazil as long as the dollar doesn’t “massively” strengthen.
Investors could also sit on their cash, although if the trade war fails to materialize and stocks advance, it’ll be a missed opportunity.
Principal Global Investors
Investors who can stomach the risk can find opportunities to buy in the Chinese stock market, said Binay Chandgothia, a fund manager at Principal Global, which manages about $445 billion globally.
“Expectations for everything from earnings to growth to returns will get to the stage where they’ve factored in all the bad news,” Chandgothia said. “Valuations by themselves aren’t triggers in the short run, but there will be opportunities there.”
Potential winners include China’s technology giants Tencent Holdings Ltd., Baidu Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., he said. “They’re all primarily domestic focused and you could find some opportunities in those names if you believe the export environment will suffer.”
Shinkin Asset Management
“Yen buying on risk aversion will dominate markets,” said Jun Kato, chief market strategist at Shinkin in Tokyo. Emerging markets are unlikely to recover in the current environment, he said.
While the dollar has been underpinned by monetary policy divergence between the Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan, sentiment may change if the pair drops below the 109.90 to 109.85 level this week, Kato said. The yen was testing those levels Tuesday in Tokyo.
K2 Asset Management
Currencies are the most likely assets to price in a trade war, and investors need to be aware of the foreign-exchange impact on their equity holdings, said James Soutter, head of global equities at K2 in Melbourne. It may be tough to calculate the impact, however.
“Estimating the financial impact versus understanding the risks are two different things,” he said. “It was very difficult for anyone to price in the Asian currency crises of the 1990s — as extreme events are rare by their nature.” — Bloomberg

Summer power peak demand exceeds forecast at 10,561 MW

PRIVATELY-OWNED National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP) said on Tuesday that no major power transmission-related issues had been reported during the past summer season when electricity demand reached its peak.
In a statement on Tuesday, NGCP said it recorded this year’s peak load demand at 10,876 megawatts (MW) at 1:53 p.m. on May 28 in the Luzon grid, breaching the demand forecast of 10,561 MW set by the Department of Energy’s power development plan.
“We are pleased to report that despite the load for the Luzon grid steadily increasing year on year, NGCP has always been one step ahead of the trend,” the company said.
“Our grid operations and maintenance plan, along with our blackout drill and generator’s conference, are important tools in our preparedness for the peak load months not only for Luzon, but also for Visayas and Mindanao during the year’s end,” it added.
NGCP attributed the successful management of power transmission services to its timely implementation of transmission projects and major improvements in the Luzon grid.
The upgrades include the Santiago-Tuguegarao 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line, the relocation of towers of the San Esteban-Laoag 230 kV line, the eastern Albay 69-kV line, and various substation upgrading projects.
NGCP said the grid operator would “continue to provide reliable power transmission services through the proper execution of its mandate to excellently operate, efficiently maintain, and continuously expand the country’s transmission network.”
It said critical projects, such as the Mindanao-Visayas interconnection project, the Cebu-Negros-Panay interconnection project, and various 500-kV transmission line projects in Luzon are key factors in the improvement of the country’s transmission highway.
“Every year, we see an aggressive rise in load growth, which means our country is developing in such a fast pace,” the company said.
“The continuous support of energy stakeholders, local government units, and the public is the most crucial aspect of the planning and execution of all our activities, and with combined efforts, we will be able to fulfill our mandate and ultimately bridge power and the progress of the nation,” it added.
NGCP is in charge of operating, maintaining, and developing the country’s power grid. — Victor V. Saulon

Australian nun could still be deported

Malacañang on Tuesday said Australian missionary Patricia Fox is not off the hook yet following the decision of the Department of Justice (DoJ) that reversed the Bureau of Immigration’s (BI) order to downgrade her missionary visa to a tourist visa. “Sister Fox is not yet off the hook. Ang napawalang bisa lang po ng (What was reversed by the) DoJ is the decision of the Commission on Immigration and Deportation (CID), which nullified her missionary visa,” Presidential Spokesperson Harry L. Roque, Jr. said in a press briefing in Cotabato City on Tuesday. Mr. Roque clarified that the deportation proceedings against Ms. Fox, which is based on allegations that she has been engaging in political activities, will continue. — Arjay L. Balinbin

Marriage is (literally) good for the heart: study

Paris, France — Even if marriage is sometimes more a bed of nails than roses, living into old age with a partner may help ward off heart disease and stroke, researchers said Tuesday.
A sweeping survey of research conducted over the last two decades covering more than two million people aged 42 to 77 found that being hitched significantly reduced the risk of both maladies, they reported in the medical journal Heart.
The study examined ethnically varied populations in Europe, North America, the Middle East and Asia, adding weight to the results.
Compared to people living in spousal union, the divorced, widowed or never married were 42 percent more likely to develop cardiovascular disease and 16 percent more likely to have coronary heart disease, the study found.
The risk of dying was likewise elevated for the non-married, by 42 percent from coronary heart disease and by 55 percent from stroke.
The results were nearly the same for men and women, except for stroke, to which men were more susceptible.
“These findings may suggest that marital status should be considered in the risk assessment for cardiovascular disease,” concluded a team led by Chun Wai Wong, a researcher at Royal Stoke Hospital’s department of cardiology, in Stoke-on-Trent in Britain.
Four-fifths of all cardiovascular disease can be attributed to a proven set of “risk factors”: advanced age, being a man, high-blood pressure, high cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes.
Marriage, in other words, could be an important share of the missing 20 percent.
More precisely, living together — with or without a wedding band — is probably the operative factor, if indeed conjugal status has any impact at all.
But most of the 34 studies reviewed by Wong and colleagues did not identify couples out of wedlock or same-sex unions, so it was not possible to know whether, statistically, such arrangements were the equivalent of being wed.
Because the study was observational rather than based on a controlled experiment — something scientists can do with mice but not humans — no clear conclusions could be drawn as to cause-and-effect.
That leaves open the question of why marriages may be “protective”.
“There are various theories,” the researchers said in a statement.
Having someone around to take care of one’s health problems and keep track of one’s meds is probably a plus, as are two incomes or pensions instead of one.
More intangibly, not living alone is thought to be good for morale, and for neural stimulation. People living in couples, earlier research has shown, also have lower rates of dementia. — AFP