Chambers back privatization gains for water
THE Makati Business Club (MBC) said the privatization of water delivery in the Philippines resulted in “indisputably better” services, with the process “considered a model around the world.”
In a statement, the MBC defended the concession system for water delivery even as it joined in the call for “accountability” for the water crisis as well as “long-term solutions” to ensure sustainable water supply for Metro Manila, on both the supply and demand side and measures to speed up the approval process for water projects.
“Makati Business Club supports the efforts that (Metropolitan) Waterworks and Sewerage System, other authorities, and Manila Water Co. are taking to investigate the water shortage that occurred this month in order to alleviate the situation, take steps to avoid or limit a repeat, and determine accountability and responsibility,” it said in a statement.
“MBC recognizes that it is critical for the government, the concessionaires, and other stakeholders to develop long-term solutions for both supply and demand. MBC stands ready with other business organizations to gather business sector inputs and support for these efforts. The most important among these solutions are to prioritize the development of and streamline the approval process for new water sources, but also include more efficient usage.”
“MBC reiterates its confidence in public-private partnerships in general and, in particular, the privatization of Manila’s water system, which is considered a model around the world. Our members suffered with the rest of public, from the shortage of water in our homes and our businesses. But service is indisputably better than before privatization. We are confident in the resolve of the concessionaires and regulators to make all efforts to improve reliability in the months and years ahead.”
The club’s statement was one of two issued Monday by major business groups on the water crisis, after services started to fail in early March in the east zone of Metro Manila, the concession granted to Ayala-controlled Manila Water Co.
In a joint statement issued Monday and signed, among others, by the American Chamber of Commerce, Inc. (AmCham) and the Foundation for Economic Freedom, whose members consist of retired technocrats and economic managers, business groups said they “welcome and fully support the directive of President Duterte to solve the water service disruption in the east zone concession within 150 days.”
“Accordingly, we are encouraged and confident that these interim measures will adequately resolve the water shortage and bring relief to consumers in the shortest possible time,” they added.
The signatories to the statement also included the Asia Pacific Real Estate Association; Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines; the Institute of Corporate Directors; the Management Association of the Philippines; and the Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
The signatories also noted that the privatization model in the water sector remains a “good” scheme, citing the huge improvement from nearly two decades when the water services were privatized.
“The volume of water saved from leakage is said to be equivalent to the output of a dam such that the great expense in constructing one in the past to cover that same volume was rendered unnecessary. Happily, gone are the waterless days of old. In fact, this privatization is being regarded as a good model before the international community for others to emulate,” they said.
They also urged the government to secure a secondary water source to address the growing needs of Metro Manila and its surrounding areas.
“Many lessons can be learned from this unfortunate episode and, hopefully, they will be employed to further improve the service and avoid a recurrence in the future,” they added. — Janina C. Lim
Budget saga nearing conclusion; bill may be with Palace next week
By Charmaine A. Tadalan
Reporter
THE House of Representatives and the Senate plan to transmit the P3.757-trillion national budget to the Office of the President this week, as agreed during a Monday meeting intended to resolve the budget impasse.
“That’s the common agenda, that’s the bilateral objective — to have this 2019 National Budget sent to Malacañang for the President’s signature, the soonest possible time without any further delay,” Albay-1st district Rep. Edcel C. Lagman told reporters in a chance interview after the meeting.
“The dialogue is in progress. We’re going to meet again tomorrow night at 7:00 p.m. The Senate panel will have to talk with the Senate President. Hopefully, by tomorrow night, we can resolve the impasse. As long as we’re talking there’s light at the end of the tunnel,” he added, noting Senate President Vicente C. Sotto III was not at the meeting.
In a “last-ditch effort” to break the deadlock, the House on March 20 “physically retrieved” the printed copies of the national budget, signed by Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, which were transmitted to the Senate on March 11.
House Appropriations Committee chair Rolando G. Andaya, Jr. of the 1st district of Camarines Sur said aside from agreeing to do away with a reenacted budget, the House contingent also explained the budget process to the Senate.
“There are no more contentious points. We had a very lively conversation. We were able to explain both our sides in a very conducive manner for understanding at hopefully, maybe tomorrow, we’ll be able to come to an agreement,” Mr. Andaya said in a chance interview on Monday.
On the issue of lump sum appropriations, he said: “We explained to each other the history of what we did. There was some re-visiting of practices (from similar situations) in 1987,” he said.
The lump sums underwent a process of “itemization” by members of the House after the bicameral conference committee ratified the document, which became a point of contention between both chambers. The Senate is insisting on the version agreed by its representatives in bicameral session, while the House claims the itemization of lump sums minimizes corruption.
Also present during the meeting were San Juan Rep. Ronaldo B. Zamora and Senators Panfilo M. Lacson and Loren B. Legarda. The latter chairs the Finance committee. Mr. Andaya noted that Mr. Lagman and Mr. Zamora were chosen for the chamber’s three-man team for their experience in budget legislation.
He said the panel hopes to transmit the budget to President Rodrigo R. Duterte “before the 29th.”
The Executive branch, meanwhile, was also represented at the meeting by the Department of Budget and Management. “We were with the DBM earlier and we were asking for their opinion about the best time to pass the Budget and they said we need to take advantage of the good weather window (for construction),” Mr. Andaya said.
The Senate has alleged that the House realigned parts of the budget of the Department of Public Works and Highways and the Department of Health, amounting to P79 billion and P15 billion, respectively, after the Feb. 8 ratification.
Mr. Andaya said the Senate also made P75 billion in “post-bicam realignments.”
The budget impasse has resulted in the reenactment of the budget for the first quarter of 2019, which prompted the Development Budget Coordination Committee to slash its growth forecast for 2019 gross domestic product (GDP) to 6-7% from 7-8%. The National Economic and Development Authority, meanwhile, said GDP growth will decline to 6.1-6.3% if the budget is reenacted until April and 4.9-5.1% if until August.
SSS angling for new contribution hikes to fund maternity benefits
THE Social Security System (SSS) said the net impact of expanded maternity benefits will subtract a year from its actuarial fund life, and proposed a new round of hikes in member contribution rates to fund its increased commitments.
In a news conference on Monday, the pension fund said fund life is now estimated to run to 2044 if SSS pays out expanded maternity benefits under the new law if it does not access new sources of funding.
“Without funding, if the social security fund absorbs the cost, it… will shorten our fund life by one more year, so we’re now at 2044,” SSS Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary Edgar B. Cruz said on Monday.
He added that the fund will have to disburse P13.5 billion during the first year of implementation of the expanded maternity benefits, more than double the P6 billion allotted in previous years.
Republic Act (RA) No. 11210 or the Expanded Maternity Leave (EML) Law was signed by President Rodrigo R. Duterte in February, increasing paid maternity leave to 105 days from the current 60 days.
Under the new law, qualified members will receive P70,000 worth of maternity benefits regardless of the means of the child’s delivery, from the previous P32,000 for normal delivery.
Aurora C. Ignacio, SSS officer-in-charge, said the fund is “hopeful” it will be allowed to increase contributions rates again beyond the latest round of adjustments hiking member contributions.
“What we hope for after the number of years that we will be allowed to give the one [percentage point increase] every other year is to increase to cover the maternity benefits,” Ms. Ignacio said. “We were also allowed to do actuarial evaluation every three years. For now, we will try to cover with whatever we have.”
She added that the SSS can conduct an actuarial study earlier than the scheduled one in 2021 to determine whether the pension fund should increase contributions to fund the additional benefits.
According to its estimates, the pension fund will have to increase contributions by half a percentage point to cover for the expanded maternity benefits.
“We can’t increase benefits without a corresponding increase in contributions. If we don’t the fund life will suffer,” Mr. Cruz said.
RA No. 11199 or the Social Security Act of 2018 was signed by Mr. Duterte on Feb. 7, allowing the Social Security Commission or the policy-making body of the SSS to increase the contribution rate without the approval of the president.
The contribution rate will be increased by a percentage point starting April to 12%, until it hits 15% by 2025, from the current 11%.
It also gradually raises the minimum and maximum monthly salary credits (MSC) every other year starting next month at P2,000 and P20,000, respectively, to P5,000 and P35,000 by 2025, from P1,000 and P16,000 currently.
The increased contribution rate and MSC are expected to increase the actuarial life of the SSS to 2045 from 2032.
Voltaire P. Agas, SSS senior vice president and chief legal counsel, said the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the EML Law are being drafted by the SSS together with the Department of Labor and Employment.
“We hope they can provide the IRR by Labor Day,” he said. — Karl Angelo N. Vidal
Palace: Normal to pledge resources in China loan, default unlikely
MALACAÑANG said on Monday that many features of a loan agreement with China to fund the P3.6-billion Chico River Pump Irrigation Project were “standard” for such deals, including the pledge of Philippine natural resources as security for the loan.
Nevertheless, it expressed confidence that the security will never be foreclosed on because the Philippines is unlikely to default on the loan.
The President’s Spokesperson Salvador S. Panelo made the statement at a news conference Monday after Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio aired concerns about the loan security.
Mr. Carpio has said, citing the agreement, that if the government defaults on its loan, China can seize Philippine assets in the disputed West Philippine Sea, including the gas and oil-rich Reed Bank.
“The onerous conditions that some are saying incorporated in the contract is a standard between the lender and the borrower,” Mr. Panelo said when asked about the use of natural resources as collateral.
Mr. Panelo said there was “nothing wrong” with using the country’s natural resources as collateral.
“I don’t see anything wrong because I know it will never happen. That is precisely why I am saying that perhaps the economic managers who entered into a contract know that it will never happen,” he said.
“Just like bank institutions when they lend they impose terms to make sure na mababayaran sila (that they will be paid). Eh siguro itong mga pumasok diyan, mga (Maybe when they agreed to the loan) economic managers (thought that default) never namang mangyayari (will never happen), kaya binigay nila, (which is why they agreed to the terms).”
He said that the Philippines is “known for paying its loans.”
“Number one, bakit naman tayo magde-default? (why will we default?) We never defaulted on any obligations to any international organization with respect to loans of our country,” he said.
Mr. Panelo also reiterated that the Philippine government “cannot do anything” about China’s moves in the West Philippine Sea.
“We can only protest like any other (claimant) country, like Vietnam and others… You want us to declare war against them?” he said following reports that Filipino fishermen have been harassed in the West Philippine Sea.
Mr. Panelo added that the government will not go along with China’s treatment of fishermen. “If there is a violation, then we will have to go back to them (and point out violations),” he said.
Mr. Panelo also questioned the filing of a complaint by former Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert F. del Rosario and former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales against Chinese President Xi Jinping and other officials before the International Criminal Court (ICC) for “crimes against humanity” allegedly committed in the West Philippine Sea.
He said Mr. Del Rosario “did not make noise while he was in office, but is now acting when he is out of power.”
On Ms. Carpio-Morales’ involvement, Mr. Panelo said: “I have no problems with her. She filed it out of righteous indignation.” — Arjay L. Balinbin
Hanjin ex-workers march to DoLE to seek dialogue over benefits
THE PAYMENT of separation benefits to workers of Hanjin Heavy Industries and Construction Corp. Philippines (HHIC-Phil) may have been clouded by the workers’ expectations of remaining employed by the failed shipyard, with the Labor department expressing doubt that the remaining workers can obtain relief.
The former shipyard workers staged protests at the Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) seeking a tripartite dialogue involving DoLE and the shipyard’s receiver, which DoLE said it was willing to support though it was less certain of the outcome.
In an interview with BusinessWorld on Monday, Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Hanjin Shipyard (SAMAHAN) President Efran Vinluan said that the tripartite dialogue should include the rehabilitation receiver, Rosario S. Bernaldo.
“Gusto namin na mag-file kami para sa tripartite dialogue kasama ang receiver, ang Hanjin, at ang DoLE na kailangan na maitawad kami (We want to initiate a tripartite dialogue with the receiver, Hanjin, and DoLE),” Mr. Vinluan said.
Hanjin continues to employ 53 workers as a skeleton crew for the shipyard. Last month, HHIC-Phil laid off more than 3,000 of its workers after defaulting on its loans to Philippine banks, leaving 312.
Mr. Vinluan said that out of the 312, 113 were “locked out” because they refused the voluntary retrenchment program. He added that the company was not able to give the remaining 53 benefits, such as separation pay, which was earlier committed to by DoLE during a previous dialogue.
DoLE Undersecretary Benjo Santos M. Benavidez said that the Labor department is open to dialogue but there is not much that the dialogue can do.
“The question is what is there to discuss?” Mr. Benavidez said in an interview with BusinessWorld on Monday.
He added: “It was not Hanjin that offered the voluntary retrenchment. It was the contractors.”
The remaining and laid-off workers are formally employed by 17 contractors. HHIC-Phil’s general contractor, Subic Shipbuilder Corp. (SUSHICOR), committed to pay its workers separation pay and other benefits.
Mr. Benavidez said that the remaining workers refused to receive their benefits because they did not want to apply for the voluntary retrenchment program. The Labor department is monitoring the payments by the contractors, with Mr. Benavidez saying most workers have been paid.
“The Secretary of Labor (Silvestre H. Bello III) pledged that we will facilitate the separation pay (but the workers don’t want to take it) because they want to return to Hanjin). They are questioning the retrenchment,” he said.
He said if these workers are challenging the legality of the program, the matter is beyond the mandate of DoLE.
The proper venue, he said, is the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), where an arbiter will determine what action can be taken.
He said: “If (the workers) are questioning the legality of the retrenchment, then (the workers should) file a case.” — Gillian M. Cortez
First shipment of mangoes to Russia seen next month
THE Department of Agriculture (DA) is expecting to export mangoes to Russia starting next month Secretary Emmanuel F. Piñol said on Monday.
“Philippine Ambassador to the Russian Federation Carlos D. Sorreta said that he has been working on the shipment of mangoes to Russia for the last two years only to be told that there is not enough supply of the Guimaras variety,” Mr. Piñol said in a social media post.
“I was informed that the harvest has started and that an initial shipment can be made by the first week of April,” Mr. Piñol added.
Mr. Piñol, who was visiting Russia, said he was able to inspect a store which sold mangoes from Thailand, India and Pakistan for the equivalent of P1,000 each.
“I was shocked to discover that huge mango which is not even half as sweet as the Philippine mango was sold for P1,000,” Mr. Piñol said.
“The entry of the Philippine mango into the Russian and Belarusian markets can radically change the preferences of consumers in Eastern Europe,” he added.
Mr. Piñol said that while Guimaras mangoes will remain on the premium end of the market, the DA also aims to market other mangoes from the Philippines with labels of origin.
The other areas supplying mangoes are Zambales, Pangasinan, Cebu, Iloilo, the Davao Region, and Cotabato. — Reicelene Joy N. Ignacio
NEDA: March inflation estimate is ‘same or lower’ compared with February’s 3.8%
THE National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) said it expects inflation in March to be lower or level with February’s.
“We’re expecting it (to be) either the same or lower,” Assistant Secretary for NEDA’s Regional Development Office Mercedita A. Sombilla said in a news conference on Monday when asked for the agency’s estimate for inflation this month.
In February, inflation was 3.8%, unchanged from a year earlier and down from 4.4% in January.
NEDA’s March projection hinges on the continued of oil prices and rice, according to Ms. Sombilla.
She said the estimates also factor in the effects of the El Niño, which the economic planners assume will have “a very minimal” effect, particularly on rice production.
According to the Department of Agriculture’s Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Operations Center, damage inflicted by El Niño on farms totaled P1.33 billion as of March 19, covering 78,348 metric tons (MT) of output.
Losses to the rice crop totaled 41,003 MT, worth P814.40 million.
Ms. Sombilla also said traders may soon import rice to further shore up domestic supply if the El Niño threat intensifies, with the Rice Tariffication Law’s implementing rules and regulations up for signing within the week.
In addition, rice stocks built up before the Rice Tariffication Law kicked in are still available to keep supply stable, Ms. Sombilla said.
According to the National Food Authority, the inventory of rice, including approved orders from Dec. 20, 2018 to March 5, totaled 357,816.45 metric tons.
Despite prices of the staple grain being steady, NEDA said it “remains vigilant” on other commodities such as corn which has also been “slightly” affected by El Niño.
The government forecasts inflation in 2019 to average within the 2 to 4% range. — Janina C. Lim
NGCP activates Bataan-Pampanga transmission line
PRIVATELY OWNED National Grid Corp. of the Philippines (NGCP) has energized its P316-million Hermosa-Floridablanca 69-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to bring more reliable services to customers in Pampanga.
The project is among the list of projects that the Department of Energy (DoE) certified as being of national significance in January. It was energized on Feb. 28 and will ease the load of the existing and aging Hermosa-Guagua 69kV line, the company said.
“Due to the load growth in the area, the 53-year-old existing line cannot accommodate the heavy loading conditions and would have caused problems in the long run,” NGCP said in a statement. “A new line was required to ensure the reliability of power transmission services.”
NGCP said the project complies with the “N-1 component” set by the Philippine Grid Code, referring to the ability of the grid to withstand a major disturbance with minimal disruption to the system.
It said with the new line in place, the grid operator will also be able improve services to the franchise area of the Pampanga II Electric Cooperative.
It added that apart from the Hermosa-Floridablanca transmission line, the company is working on reliability projects such as the western Luzon 500-kV backbone project.
NGCP said it will also install a new transmission corridor, the Bataan 230-kV reinforcement project, which will serve power customers in Bataan and nearby provinces and accommodate incoming generating capacity. It will also put up the Nagsaag-Tumana 69-kV transmission line project, which will serve customers in Pangasinan.
“We continue to appeal for support from our stakeholders in the smooth implementation of our projects, which will ultimately benefit all power consumers not only in Luzon, but in the entire country,” NGCP said.
A certificate that an energy project is of national significance, known as a CEPNS, entitles project proponents to all the rights and privileges provided for under Executive Order 30 series of 2017, including action on the application within 30 working days.
Certified projects also enjoy presumption of prior approval — they are presumed to have already complied with the requirements and permits from other government permitting agencies.
It will be deemed approved if no action is taken five days after the lapse of the 30 working-day period for processing of the application. — Victor V. Saulon
Post Clearance Audits: Are you prepared enough?
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. Preparing for an upcoming customs audit is one way to minimize, if not to avoid, the risk of having deficiency assessments. The recent issuance of the Customs Administrative Order (CAO) No. 1-2019 marks the beginning of the audit season for importers.
As of Jan. 11, the Bureau of Customs (BoC) has issued 31 Audit Notification Letters (ANLs) on various importers. Some 29 ANLs have been served, and the audit proper of these companies have yet to commence. The BoC is committed to release more in the coming days.
The idea of receiving an ANL might cause companies stress, especially if they are not prepared for an audit. Hence, to avoid that stress, planning and preparation are important.
Under CAO No. 1-2019, importers are obliged to keep, at their principal place of business, all their records pertaining to the ordinary course of business within three years from the date of final payment of duties and taxes or customs clearance, whichever is later. Aside from importers, all parties engaged in Customs clearance and processing, as well as locators, are likewise required to keep records related to such Customs clearance and processing.
Non-compliance with this obligation may result in a 20% surcharge, suspension, or cancellation of the importer’s accreditation. The delivery or release of their subsequent imported articles may, likewise, be put on hold to answer for the fine and any revised assessment. In addition, importers are deemed to have waived their right to contest the results of the audit based on records kept by the BoC. Aside from these, imprisonment of not more than three to six years and a fine of P1 million may be imposed on those who fail to keep and maintain their records.
To avoid these penalties, importers should be ready before the audit team of the BoC visits their place of business armed with an Audit Notification Letter. As early as now, it is better for importers to evaluate, review, or make a self-assessment on their records and prepare a checklist of the required documents in case they are subject to a customs audit. These required documents are: (1) documentation on the entity organization and structure; (2) documentation on orders and purchases; (3) documentation on shipping, importation, exportation and transport; (4) documentation on manufacturing, stock and resale; (5) financial documents, such as financial statements and other accounting information; (6) charts and codes of accounts, general and subsidiary ledgers, general journal, accounting instruction manuals, and system and program documentation.
If, during the early evaluation or self-assessment, importers discover errors in their goods declaration due to a mistake or negligence, they may avail of the benefits of the Prior Disclosure Program (PDP). The PDP authorizes the BoC to accept prior disclosure by importers of errors and omissions in goods declaration, resulting in a deficiency in duties and taxes on past importations. It also includes disclosure of royalties and other proceeds of any subsequent resale, disposal, or use of the imported goods accruing directly or indirectly to the seller, or on any subsequent adjustment to the price paid or payable.
Any importer may avail of the PDP, except for those whose goods declarations are the subject of pending cases with other Customs offices, or covered by cases already filed and pending in courts, and those with fraudulent goods declarations. If availed of by the importer that has already received an ANL, the duly accomplished application form for prior disclosure stating the errors in goods declaration and tendering payment of the deficiency duties, taxes, and penalties must be filed within 90 calendar days from the receipt of ANL.
What is the significance of availing of the PDP?
Without availing of the PDP, an importer, if found to have incurred deficiencies in duties and taxes, shall be penalized depending on the existence of fraud and negligence. In case of negligence, the importer shall be penalized with a fine equivalent to 125% of the lost revenue. However, if the importer committed fraud, the penalty is as high as 600% of the lost revenue and imprisonment of not less than two years but not more than eight years.
On the other hand, the PDP, once availed of, removes the payment of the above penalties. If the PDP is availed of prior to the receipt of ANL, the importer shall only be liable for the deficiencies in duties and tax due, plus 20% legal interest per annum. If the same is availed after the receipt of the ANL, in addition to the deficiency in duties and taxes, the importers are, likewise, liable to 10% of the basic deficiency plus 20% legal interest. For penalties and other proceeds of any subsequent resale or disposal that have accrued to the seller, importers may pay only the deficiency in duties and taxes without penalties and interest, provided that the disclosure is made within 30 calendar days from the payment, accrual, or adjustment.
However, please note that availing of the PDP is not automatic. It is still subject to the verification and approval of the Post Clearance Audit Group. Failure to provide the necessary documentation, other material inaccuracies, mistakes and errors in the goods declaration, and the existence of fraud on the part of the importer may result in the disapproval of the application and the conduct of a formal and full audit.
With proper preparation, importers may confidently handle a future customs audit. The question now is this: can you confidently handle a customs audit?
Let’s Talk Tax is a weekly newspaper column of P&A Grant Thornton that aims to keep the public informed of various developments in taxation. This article is not intended to be a substitute for competent professional advice.
Zhainey C. Apostol is an associate from the Tax Advisory & Compliance division of P&A Grant Thornton, the Philippine member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd.
pagrantthornton@ph.gt.com.
Agri-development: more than irrigation, post-harvest facilities, and farm-to-market roads
Many politicians propose solving rural poverty via three areas: irrigation, post-harvest facilities and farm-to-market roads. I beg to differ. It is much more than that. Indeed, needs are area and crop-specific. High productivity and diversification require these investments, but there are more to spur investments.

IRRIGATION
Water is plant life. Unfortunately, irrigation in this country is focused on rice irrigation. There are about 1.7 million hectares (ha) of land with irrigation, says the National Irrigation Administration (NIA). Public irrigation is designed to flood rice plants. Palay needs about three cubic meters per kilo produced, or 12,000 cubic meters per hectare per harvest. Since it is an aquatic plant, it requires far more water than other crops.
The huge irrigation investments in this country mainly benefit rice and little for corn, coconut, sugarcane, fruits, among other crops. These systems are mainly river diversions and reservoir dams, such as the large Magat river irrigation system in Isabela and Upper Pampanga river irrigation system in Nueva Ecija.
The common irrigated farm system is rice in the wet season and rice in the dry season. In some places, the dry season crop can be tobacco, tomato (Ilocos region) and corn (Cagayan Valley).
But modern irrigation technologies have evolved. And they economize on water. Cavendish banana for export uses drip irrigation or sprinkler irrigation to achieve quality and high yields. Durian farms in Thailand use micro-sprinklers. Coffee and cacao need supplementary irrigation. Greenhouse veggies use soil-less drip systems but can produce several harvests a year.
New systems, such as the proposed Chico river irrigation system in Kalinga and Cagayan that will irrigate 8,700 hectares, are not cheap at P500,000 per ha even it irrigates 4,400 farmers.
Small farm reservoirs that trap water in the wet season and release water in the dry season for crops need to expand their coverage. This is in the context of the country’s topography and climate change.
In the Philippines, lowlands are mostly narrow coastal strips except for larger plains in Luzon (Cagayan Valley and Central Plains), Mindanao (Cotabato and Davao-Agusan valleys), and others in Negros and Panay. Rivers are short and generally seasonal in flow.
What is the message? Irrigation is more than just rice irrigation. Many crops need it to achieve quality and yield. Consider irrigation design as part of the overall irrigation and poverty reduction strategy.
POST-HARVEST FACILITIES
Post-harvest losses are high in developing countries. They can reach 15% for palay (IRRI, 2015), and 20-40% for vegetables (PSA 2012, as quoted by Mopera, 2016). Mopera claims that “food loss is mostly caused by the inability of the small farmers to provide proper post-harvest handling, which includes storage facilities, infrastructure, cooling chains, packaging and marketing systems.”
One challenge for an efficient post-harvest facility is scale and organization. Small and fragmented holdings do not augur well for a viable facility.
The use of combined harvesters for rice can minimize harvest losses. Modern rice mills can yield high mill recovery.
Private-run facilities observe scale economics. A banana packing house for 25 ha can deliver two containers of export banana a week. I also saw a coop-run kiwi packing house in New Zealand for 150 ha.
FARM-TO-MARKET ROADS (FMRS)
FMRs invariably have many social benefits. They make roads passable all-year-round and reduce transport costs of both farm inputs and outputs. They open up new areas for development. They also open villages to extension and health services of government as well as promote competition by traders.
A standard concrete FMR is not cheap at P10 million per kilometer. Hopefully, it is built to standard and no leakages occur. And it is maintained well.
FMR and tree-crop investments need to be compared given scarce resources. Coffee can be planted/intercropped with a budget of P150,000 per ha, and modern banana farm at P1M per ha. Each can benefit one farmer.
When building FMRs, therefore, economic trade-offs need to be considered.
Are there equally important rural investments aside from the three areas? Yes. Investments can also be made on the following:
• Cost-sharing by local government with entrepreneurs for planting marketable crops like cacao, coffee, rubber and oil palm
• Establishing modern nurseries
• Stringing electric posts to aquaculture ponds or mariculture parks. It is costly for investors to pay for electric posts and lines to their farms. I understand in Vietnam and China, the government spends for these.
• Small port rehabilitation or RORO port
• Access roads to farm tourism sites
• Flood control
• More weather stations
The primordial criterion is how public investments can contribute to value chain competitiveness. It is about economic justification and poverty alleviation impact. When a third of farmers and fishers are poor, trade-off and prudence are keys to project selection.
This article reflects the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect the official stand of the Management Association of the Philippines or the MAP.
Rolando T. Dy is the Co-Vice Chair of the MAP AgriBusiness Committee and the Executive Director of the Center for Food and AgriBusiness of the University of Asia & the Pacific.
map@map.org.ph
rdyster@gmail.com
http://map.org.ph
MORE airline competition
The Market-Oriented Reforms for Efficiency (MORE) series continues and tackles the air transportation sector. For an archipelago of more than 7,500 islands and about 20 are big islands with big populations, and air travel is necessary to hasten the movement of people and goods.
For the Philippines, the good news is that from mere trickles of less than nine million local and foreign passengers transported in the past four decades (1986, 1996, 2006 data), things have significantly improved starting 2010 (global recovery from financial turmoil of 2008-09, then change of administration from Gloria Arroyo to Benigno Aquino III). That year, passengers jumped to 22.6 million, then 35 million in 2014 and 40 million in 2016.
The bad news is that compared to our neighbors in East Asia, we are not dynamic and liberal enough to allow more airline competitors, and/or we do not have more big airports, including budget terminals, to fly more passengers. Several neighbors with smaller populations than us — Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand, S. Korea — have more air passengers than the Philippines (see table).

Note that of the Philippines’ 40 million passengers in 2016, only six million were international visitors (corresponding to 6 million foreign arrivals,) so some 34 million or 85% were domestic passengers.
We need to further liberalize airline competition in the country. We also need to expand physical infrastructures like bigger and more provincial airports, have more budget terminals, more toll roads that link the airports to big city centers and major tourist destinations.
These will have a combined effect of attracting more local and foreign fliers, and of hastening commerce, tourism, investments, job creation, business expansion and economic growth in the country.
Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Minimal Government Thinkers
minimalgovernment@gmail.com

