Home Editors' Picks Inflation, mining and WHO pandemic treaty

Inflation, mining and WHO pandemic treaty


My Cup Of Liberty

This piece will cover three different topics so we will discuss them directly.

Stagflation — a combination of economic stagnation plus high inflation — is becoming more real than fictional for many countries. There should be a strong recovery after the global lockdowns and mobility restrictions of 2020-2021, but the Ukraine war and economic sanctions against Russia caused a global adverse impact on commodities, especially in energy supply and prices.

The US inflation rate was only 1.4% when Trump left the White House in January 2021. It jumped to 7.5% in January 2022 even before the Ukraine war. Then it further rose to 7.9% in February, 8.5% in March, and 8.3% in April, the highest rates since 1982 or 40 years ago. The UK’s 9% inflation rate in April was the highest in 40 years too. And Germany’s 7.4% in April was the highest since the 1970s.

Among the G7 industrialized countries, only Japan had an inflation rate below 2% for January-April 2022 (JA22). East Asian economies now have more price stability than industrialized Europe and North America (Table 1).

High inflation discourages more household spending, which cuts corporate and manufacturing revenues, which leads to low if not stagnant growth. When trade is politicized via economic sanctions, the world gets more politics and less trade. And less growth with high inflation. Bad.

A good development recently was that the South Cotabato provincial council has lifted the ban on open-pit mining for the Tampakan gold-copper project that was imposed in 2010. See these recent reports in BusinessWorld:

1. “Philippines removes last hurdle for stalled Tampakan copper-gold project” (May 17)

2. “End to open-pit ban triggers showdown over Tampakan” (May 17)

3. “DENR to watch Tampakan closely after province lifts open-pit ban” (May 18)

4. “South Cotabato lifting of open-pit ban still at risk of governor’s veto” (May 22).

The Tampakan project should be the Philippines’ single biggest foreign direct investment (FDI) at $5.9 billion. It is a shame that the country has not optimized revenues and job creation with the recent high global prices of gold, copper, nickel and other mining products as the project has estimated reserves of 15 million tons of copper and 17.6 million ounces of gold.

The peak prices of gold this year are 33% higher than in 2019 and 51% higher than 2018 prices. Peak prices of copper this year are 65% and 49% higher than their peak prices in 2019 and 2018. And nickel — Wow! — peak prices this year are 166% and 208% higher than 2019 and 2018 prices, respectively.

At such prices, the Philippines could have earned several billion dollars more in exports, the national and provincial governments could have earned several billion pesos more in taxes, and the mining communities could have received hundreds of million pesos more for mandatory community spending like the social development and management program (SDMP).

Population crisis, food/hunger crisis, oil/energy crisis, HIV/AIDS crisis, NCDs/smoking crisis, HIV/AIDS crisis, refugee crisis, gender/racial crisis, education/housing crisis, plastic/garbage crisis, climate crisis, COVID crisis, now an emerging monkeypox crisis.

We have heard or read these and many other alarming stories since the 1960s until today. And always the “solution” to these endless crisis narratives is more government, more UN, and more multilaterals. The anti-mining groups also have their scare-mongering that open-pit mining will “expose residents to pollution… exacerbate climate vulnerabilities…”

This week, May 22-28, the World Health Assembly of the World Health Organization (WHO) plans to amend the International Health Regulations, an agreement in 2005 that was adopted by 194 member states that recognizes the sovereignty of nations and the need for localized action in cases of epidemics and other disease outbreaks.

The planned amendments are giving more authority to WHO Regional Directors to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC), and more authority to the WHO Director-General to issue an “Immediate Public Health Alert” (IPHA). The goal is more global health central planning, generally one-size-fits-all action by the WHO, like the global lockdowns in 2020, and, in the process, trumping country-specific and decentralized health actions.

Central planning is lousy and inefficient. That is why the old USSR, the communist states of eastern Europe, collapsed in 1989-1991.

Going back to the endless crisis narratives of the past six decades, even if only one of them was true, people should have shorter lives, the human population should plateau and decline, and this is not the case. Practically anywhere in the world, humans live healthier and longer lives (Table 3).

My three recommendations for these three issues are as follows.

One, free trade of commodities and energy products from Russia and elsewhere should proceed and not be politicized. Overall price stability is premised on supply stability of important commodities. Then growth can resume and not stagnate.

Two, more big mining projects please. In particular, the Tampakan gold-copper open-pit project should proceed subject to existing environmental regulations, taxes, and mandatory community spending.

Three, “no” to more health central planning by the WHO. It has wielded huge powers in the recent COVID-19 lockdowns and mass vaccination already, it should not be institutionalized. Pandemic response should be decentralized among countries.


Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Minimal Government Thinkers.