Suits The C-Suite
By Noel Andro D. Bico

IN BRIEF:
• The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) suspended tax audits to address systemic weaknesses and improve the integrity of audit operations.
• The suspension was lifted with new guidelines that emphasize a single-instance audit framework, consolidation of pending audits, and a more objective selection process to enhance transparency and accountability.
• Taxpayers now must adapt to a more structured audit environment that prioritizes compliance, documentation, and preparedness, fostering a fairer tax landscape that benefits both the government and taxpayers.
The suspension of tax audits by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) was not simply an operational interruption. It was an institutional acknowledgment that something deeper needed attention.
For taxpayers and practitioners alike, it validated the long-held view that tax enforcement is only effective when grounded in a fair, consistent and well-controlled audit process. As the BIR seeks to modernize and enhance the integrity of its audit operations, both taxpayers and practitioners are left to navigate the implications of these changes.
This article explores the basis for the suspension, the resumption of audit activities, and the new framework that will govern tax audits moving forward.
The suspension was first imposed through Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 107-2025 on Nov. 24, following numerous concerns raised by taxpayers, stakeholders and internal units about irregular audit practices and inconsistencies across audit execution.
Through RMC No. 1092025, issued on Dec. 12, the BIR clarified that the purpose of the suspension was to address systemic weaknesses in the audit process, protect taxpayer rights, and improve the integrity of audit operations. The BIR acknowledged the need to correct operational issues and develop a more transparent, standardized and modernized audit system.
The suspension was formally lifted through RMC No. 82026 dated Jan. 27, restoring all tax audit and field operations previously suspended under RMC Nos. 1072025 and 1092025.
This included the resumption of:
• Issuance of Electronic Letters of Authority (eLAs), Mission Orders (MOs), and Tax Verification Notices (TVNs)
• Continuation of previously suspended audit cases
• Enforcement, verification, assessment, and collection activities requiring field audits
• All other actions which are necessary to protect revenue or enforce compliance.
All tax audit and related field operations must comply with the new guidelines provided under Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 1-2026, also dated Jan. 27.
RMO No. 12026 introduced a refreshed audit framework centered on consistency, control, and accountability. Among its key reforms are:
Single-instance audit framework. Taxpayers will now be subject to only one eLA per taxable year covering all internal revenue tax types, including value-added tax (VAT), subject to limited exceptions such as fraud cases, onetime transactions, tax clearance requests and business closure cases. This framework addresses the long-standing issue of overlapping or redundant audits.
Consolidation of pending eLAs. Beginning March 4, all pending eLAs for the same taxpayer and taxable year will be automatically consolidated into a single eLA unless the taxpayer opts out through a written request.
System-assisted and anonymized selection and assignment process. New eLAs will now be issued through a system-assisted, anonymized selection and assignment process that relies on automated risk parameters. This reduces discretion, minimizes potential manipulation, and supports a more objective audit selection process.
Removal of VAT audit sections and audit task forces. The BIR abolished the VAT Audit Sections and other audit task forces, confining audit authority to the Large Taxpayers Service and regional offices to ensure clearer oversight.
Proper audit and assessment procedures. The RMO required the use of standardized audit checklists, complete documentation of audit activities, and signed minutes of discussions by both the taxpayer and the Revenue Officer. It also prohibits the issuance of unreasonable assessments. Assessment notices must address only the issues that remain unresolved after the discrepancy discussion and must clearly present their factual and legal bases, in compliance with due process requirements.
The resumption of audits under this revised framework marks a shift not only in policy but in tax audit culture. What began as a temporary stop has become a pivotal point, reshaping expectations for both the BIR and the taxpayers it oversees.
Moving forward, taxpayers can expect:
• More structured and transparent audits
• Closer scrutiny of both factual findings and legal bases
• Greater emphasis on documentation and record-keeping
• Stronger accountability and oversight from revenue officers
With RMC No. 82026 lifting the audit suspension and RMO No. 12026 reshaping the audit system into one that is more data-driven, risk-based, and accountable, taxpayers now operate in a more rigorous landscape.
In this environment, preparedness is more than a defensive measure. It is a strategic practice that safeguards business continuity, supports compliance, and strengthens trust in the tax system. A tax audit may begin with the BIR, but the advantage always belongs to the taxpayer who is ready.
As the BIR implements these reforms, the emphasis on transparency, accountability, and fairness in the audit process is expected to foster a more equitable tax environment. Taxpayers must adapt to this new framework by enhancing their compliance practices and ensuring that they are well-prepared for audits.
The changes signal a commitment to a more robust and trustworthy tax system that benefits both the government and the taxpayers it serves. By embracing these developments, stakeholders can work collaboratively towards a more efficient and fair tax landscape.
This article is for general information only and is not a substitute for professional advice where the facts and circumstances warrant. The views and opinions expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of SGV & Co.
Noel Andro D. Bico is a senior director from the Global Compliance & Reporting Sub-Service Line of SGV & Co.