Home Technology Google, Amazon join online protest of net neutrality change

Google, Amazon join online protest of net neutrality change

HOW MANY online activists does it take to save Silicon Valley’s favorite Obama-era regulation?

Organizers of an online protest aimed at derailing a Republican plan to roll back net neutrality rules are hoping the magic number is 70,000. That’s the number of sites and organizations — including Amazon.com, Google, Facebook and even President Donald Trump’s favored medium, Twitter — that have pledged to participate.

On Wednesday, the big commercial sites will join scores of online activists and businesses in telling users about the change planned in Washington — and ask the visitors to contact Congress and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), where Republican Chairman Ajit Pai, a Trump appointee, commands a majority and is moving toward gutting the rule against interfering with Web traffic.

The protest comes as Democratic lawmakers bring renewed focus on the issue. Democratic senators Ron Wyden, of Oregon, and Brian Schatz, of Hawaii, on Monday asked the FCC to ensure its computer system is prepared to withstand the expected surge of comments. Both senators support the embattled rule.

Already the FCC has received 5.6 million comments on the issue, ahead of a July 17 deadline for remarks. In May, televised commentary from comedian John Oliver sparked a surge of comments to the FCC.

Mark Wigfield, an FCC spokesman, declined to comment on the protests.

Scroll to continue

Organizers hope for an outpouring that can change a seemingly certain trajectory toward action by the FCC to roll back the rule that forbids broadband providers led by AT&T, Inc., Comcast Corp. and Verizon Communications, Inc. from blocking or slowing data — to hinder rivals, for instance, or to favor affiliated services.

“We’re trying to make it easier for real people to comment and make their voices heard,” said Evan Greer, campaign director for Fight for the Future, a nonprofit advocacy group that helped organize the protest. “Ajit Pai has made it clear he has no interest in listening to the public. He’s listening to the cable companies and plans to give them what they want.”

Protest organizers say that if Pai succeeds in weakening or eliminating the rule, broadband companies will slow Web traffic, block rivals’ Internet content, censor unpopular viewpoints and charge extra fees.

Backers of Pai’s move say the net-neutrality rule claims too much authority over private broadband providers, discourages investment needed to spread fast internet service to more people, and that a competitive market will ensure broadband providers treat traffic fairly.

The protest is “not going to stop the FCC,” Berin Szoka, founder of TechFreedom, a policy group that supports Pai’s move, said in an interview.

“Their entire agenda is simply to jump up and down at the FCC, and jump up and down on the Hill, and try to obstruct a legislative deal” that could see Congress resolve the years of debate over net neutrality, Szoka said.

“All lawmakers in Washington should oppose the FCC’s anti-net neutrality proposal that will do immeasurable harm to free speech and innovation, and is deeply unpopular,” Mark Stanley, a spokesman with Demand Progress, a group helping to organize the protest, said in an e-mailed statement today.

But lawmakers aren’t running the net neutrality proceeding as Pai heads toward a vote possibly later this year at the FCC. Pai’s antipathy to the rule passed in 2015 was well known when Trump elevated him to chairman in January. And in 2014 while the FCC prepared the rule, Trump in a tweet called the regulation “Obama’s attack on the internet.”

Democratic representatives are agitating against the change. “The @FCC wants to get rid of the rules that protect #net neutrality. That’s a threat to destroy the Internet as we know it,” Senator Al Franken, of Minnesota, said in a tweet. Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy also tweeted, saying, “Ending #net neutrality would allow internet providers to slow certain websites or charge more for preferential service.” — Bloomberg

BusinessWorld Online
Exit mobile version